In reply to David's question,
CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT. What is the context of
Sha'ul's letter to Galatians? When looked at properely one can (should?) easily
see that the issue Sha'ul is addressing is CIRCUMCISION! What did the
Jerusalem Council determine?
What we have here is the same l
Jeff wrote:
When looked at properely one can (should?) easily see that the issue
Sha'ul is addressing is CIRCUMCISION! What did the Jerusalem
Council determine? What we have here is the same legalistic Judaisers
causing trouble, and Sha'ul saying that legalistic observance is
worthless.
You are a
Jeff, I also neglected to say in my last post that Terry also has pointed
out that besides the issue of circumcision, there is the issue of being born
of Abraham in order to be part of that covenant. For reference, pay
attention to verse 13 below:
Genesis 17:10-14
(10) This is my covenant, whi
myth (the ff.
concept is not true)
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:15:46 -0500 "David Miller"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:||
>Sha'ul specifically says, "these women are two
covenants."
al Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 20:15
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants
Jeff wrote:
When looked at properely one can (should?) easily see that the issue
Sha'ul is addressing is CIRC
Mr.G?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004
20:33
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
myth (the ff.
concept is not true)
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:15:46 -0500 "David M
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004
20:33
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
myth (the ff.
concept is not true)
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:15:46 -0500
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:04:27 -0500 "Jeff Powers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mr.G?
jt: Wrong one to consult Jeff you'd be
much better off reading your Bible :)
"These women are two covenants; one from
Mount Sinai, bearing children unto bondage, which is Hagar. Now this Hagar
answereth t
myth (the
translation is faulty)
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:11:46 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asserts:
"These women are two
covenants..
jt: What do you mean the translation is faulty Gary?
It's the majority text..
Do you just find a translation to suit what it is you
want to believe?
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:25:58 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (the
translation is faulty)
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:11:46 -050
why aren't you
followg your advice to Jeff (Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:11:46
-0500)?
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:49:08 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jt: What do you mean the translation is faulty Gary?
||
:)
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004
23:07
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
why aren't you
followg your advice to Jeff (Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:11:46
-0500)?
On Tue, 1
jt: Oh but I am Gary; I am not seeking your counsel,
just curious because I find nothing
about you consistent other than the word "myth".
BTW what is the ff concept ie (the ff. concept is not
true)?
why aren't you
followg your advice to Jeff (Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:11:46
-0
I'm not sure who you are because I don't think you
have ever given your name. But, I would appreciate it
if you would expound on your idea that these comments
are a myth. A lot of times you write "myth." That does
not help the reader see how it is a "myth" or "concept
is not true." How is it a myth
of as home,
> i.e. his (true)
> 'mother'-land
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:04:27 -0500 "Jeff Powers"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
> Mr.G?
> - Original Message -----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sen
Please explain what it should be translated.
Suzy
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> myth (the translation is faulty)
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:11:46 -0500 Judy Taylor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> asserts:
> "These women are two covenants..
__
Do yo
Jeff wrote:
I see one covenant. God's covenant with man, begun with Abraham, amended
with Moses, Again amended with David. Jeremiah prophesied a renewal, as
did Isaiah, etc. That renewal was accomplished through Yeshua. The "New
Covenant" is not new, it is Renewed.
On what basis are you confiden
who's
shaul?
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 05:05:27 -0800 (PST) Susan
Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> I'm not sure who you are because I don't
think you> have ever given your name. But, I would appreciate it>
if you would expound on your idea that these comments> are a myth. A lot
of times y
you're
welcome
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 05:12:04 -0800 (PST) Susan
Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> Thank you for this explanation It really
helps in> understanding your post.> >
Suzy||
(is brevity germane to
'abbreviating'? is it the othr way around?
:)
(anyway, weighg
the MSS evidence available allows the correction/s, below*,
somewhere within the tolerence/s of the KJV and NIV renderings of Gal
4)
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 05:32:54 -0800 (PST) Susan
Petersen <[EMAIL PR
re:
> > "The[/]se women are [*the] two [*opposite] covenants..
also,
"The[] women [represent] two [opposing] covenants..
--
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:40:33 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(is brevity germane to
'abbreviating'? is it the othr way around?
:)
(anyway, weighg
Paul
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004
16:00
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
who's
shaul?
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 05:05:27 -0800 (PST) Susan
Petersen <[EMAIL P
ersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:05
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants
I'm not sure who you are because I don't think you
have ever given your name. But, I would appreciate it
if you would expound on your idea that the
just submitg your questions, eh?
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 05:39:01 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
||
I am not seeking your counsel
||
Not any more - just forget it please it's
not important - If you want to be
understood you will make an effort to
communicate ... judyt
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:15:33 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
just submitg your questions,
eh?
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 05:39:01 -0500 Judy Taylor <[E
understood
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:04:25 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
..just forget it please it's
not important - If you want to be
understood you will make an effort to
communicate
||
ï
jt: So Jeff what you are really saying is that when it
says "NEW" Covenant and Better Promises in the book of Hebrews what it really
means is same Ole, same Ole just "Reworked and Revised; and where we
see "OBSOLETE and DYING" this is not so either. IOW We still get
to walk after the flesh
ï
1. One OT issue to
reconsider perhaps--sparing you the current customary comment 'myth' for now--is
that while God leads Moses, God in essence leads Israel (back then); Moses, acc
to his own writg, is basically a follower of God, not the leader of
Israel in the independent sense depictd, be
In a message dated 11/17/2004 1:58:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suzy,
meet Gary, the master of one word replies. MYTH being the predominant one.
The fact that he wrote about 5 sentences this week is cause for celebration!
I think he just may be coming out of his shell,
ï
There is but one covenant (Abrahamic). It is
unilateral. It is given by God and brought to fulfilment by this same God. How?
In and through the obedient/Incarnate/Israelite, Jesus (Immanuel-God with
us)
- Original Message -
From:
Jeff
Powers
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ï
jt: Covenants are bilateral and Covenants can be
broken. There have been more than one. God made Covenant with Noah, the sign
being the rainbow. Obviously you have never done a scriptural study on the
meaning of Covenant. May I safely assume that your definition below is also
that of Torra
udy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18, 2004 05:45
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
jt: Covenants are bilateral and Covenants can be
broken. There have been more than one. God made Covenant with Noah, the sign
being the rainb
Roman 7 starts with the word "Or." So to me that means
that you need to back up and get some contextual
clues. I took the time to read Chp. 7 in three
translations(NIV, NASB, and Complete Jewish). And I
read the entire book of Romans. I couldn't stop
reading (only in one tranlation).
In chapter 6
I think that sometimes it is those who do not speak so
much that are the one's with more knowledge. Judy has
given up on you (so to speak). I think maybe it's
just a matter of asking you the right questions. Or
even one question...Could you please explain your one
word response?
I hope that I ca
And you said you didn't have a way with words.
Suzy
--- Jeff Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David,
>
> >From the beginning of God’s creation God wanted
> nothing more than a personal relationship with man.
> But, man chose not to have a relationship with God.
> During the rise of civilizat
Lance Muir wrote:
There is but one covenant
(Abrahamic). It is unilateral. It is given by God and brought to
fulfilment by this same God. How? In and through the
obedient/Incarnate/Israelite, Jesus (Immanuel-God with us)
===
Not o
re on a matter, one is better
off adopting a wait and see mode instead of an attack mode.
Your brother indeed
"L"man
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18, 2004 07:09
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
bullseye!
(Suz, I like
how John handles DavidM--I hope he hangs around,
too:)
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 04:22:28 -0800 (PST) Susan
Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:>..it's just a matter of asking..the right
questions.
Much
like the constitution of the USA,
God's covenant has been amended several times. Do we in the USA have a new
constitution today that has replace the original? Here we go again,
somebody has pryed more words out of me than I usually care to write!
Izzy, are you fol
Suzy,
meet Gary, the master of one word replies. MYTH being the predominant one.
The fact that he wrote about 5 sentences this week is cause for celebration!
I think he just may be coming out of his shell, but it is too soon to tell!
Jeff
Don't get your hopes up. What actual
As to your second observation, you would be correct.Now, as
to THAT OBSERVATION, I wish to add the following: It may be that none of 'us'
has adequately represented the theology within. Please, do not be dismissive of
that which you may not yourself adequately apprehend. Already one perso
Projector please not, a protector.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18, 2004 09:21
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
Suzy,meet Gary, the master of
one word replies. MYTH being the predominant
There was and, you failed. Seriously though, I
believe you may have approached the opportunity with a bias.
Possible?
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18, 2004 09:41
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
No, Terry, stick to your guns! You have
more sense that all of L-man’s authors put together. J Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004
7:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
Ah, yes…the liberals continue to
pile on. J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004
8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
Projector please not, a protector
: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
There was and, you failed. Seriously though, I believe you
may have approached the opportunity with a bias. Possible?
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18, 2004
09:41
Subject: RE
; Good
pedagogy!
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18, 2004 09:45
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
No, Terry, stick to
your guns! You have more sense that all of L-mans authors put together.
J
2004 8:41
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
There was and, you failed.
Seriously though, I believe you may have approached the opportunity with a
bias. Possible?
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004
10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Do you have a 'time out' corner? Go, sit in it then, come
back (15 min will do) WE ALL...I SAID ALL...HAVE BIASES..PLEASE TELL ME THAT
YOU
Fortunately, my children are smarter than
I am. And they would agree with Terry, too. J Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004
9:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
that you don't already know..just
stick to your guns' Good pedagogy!
-
Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18,
2004 09:45
Subject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
Sorry, that is what you said. Where's the
corner?
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18, 2004 11:58
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Isnt that what I
just said below??? (Are you hard of hearing?
Lance Muir wrote:
Brother Terry:
As you do not know whereof you speak
I'd suggest a little homework prior to identifying what you read as
both 'myth & dog doo doo'. You possess, I believe, an anemic grasp
of The Incarnation. When one is nescient of both ancient and
contemporar
x27;nescience') is not a
virtue. Not knowing is fine as that applies to all of us. Celebrating not
knowing..well...that ain't smart...with or without college.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18, 2004 13:01
Subjec
emasculated males on this forum. As one man to
another Terry, consider yourself rebuked.
Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry
CliftonSent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 1:01 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Lance Muir wr
Lance Muir wrote:
Terry:You obviously have received
'wisdom from the word'. I read all of your posts. I trust that if any
of your young 'uns got 'knowledge from the college' that you do not
think less of them for that.
I'm most certainly NOT educated
above my ability to lea
Fair 'nuff, Terry.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 18, 2004 14:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Lance Muir wrote:
Terry:You obviously have received 'wisdom from
the word&#x
Hughes Jonathan wrote:
Terry,
I doubt calling someone's
apprehension of the unilateral covenant (Read gospel and therefore read
Jesus Christ. We do not divide God's action from God's being.) a pile
of dogshit or a man-made story would be the reason the Lord has placed
you on
In a message dated 11/18/2004 11:58:46 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Canât somebody send him a surge protector??? Iz
:-)
J
In a message dated 11/18/2004 11:58:56 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An old saying, but a true one. "You get knowledge from college. You get wisdom from the word". The two are not the same. Some people are educated far above their ability to learn.
That is very possibly
In a message dated 11/18/2004 11:59:04 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David repeatedly states his position that we have emasculated males on this forum. As one man to another Terry, consider yourself rebuked.
Disappointed, as well.
John
:)
- Original Message -
From: "Susan Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 7:51
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
> And you said
you didn't have a way with words.> > Suzy> > ---
Jeff Po
Your gallantry is only exceeded by your generosity.
J Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004
12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
I seriously doubt that they are
emasculated
males on this forum. As one man to another Terry, consider yourself
rebuked.
Jonathan
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004
1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Cov
My
wife called me yesterday on my way to school and told me about this exchange
(with the "S" word). She was rolling on the floor, so to
speak.
I was
afraid I would return this morning to the disappearance/banning/crucifixion of
Jonathan Hughes. Jonathan... you're still here, right?
I d
ï
jt: I didn't see this yesterday - had to leave the
house early - but I would wholeheartedly second Terry's
motion.
What's wrong with reading the Bible? I never see
you quote it Lance and when Jonathan does he
apologizes. There is something really wrong with this
picture
On Thu, 18
ï
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:07:36 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What is 'obvious' to you is
incorrect as I have done such a 'study'. This word 'study', though
somewhat appropriate, is not one of my favourite words when used concerning
those words through which we com
orning.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 06:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
jt: I didn't see this yesterday - had to leave the
house early - but I would wholehear
ated another's beliefs here in our store that
protracted conversations were rarely had.
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 06:49
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:07:36 -
Slade Henson wrote:
My wife called me yesterday on my way to school
and told me about this exchange (with the "S" word). She was rolling on
the floor, so to speak.
I was afraid I would return this morning to the
disappearance/banning/crucifixion of Jonathan Hughes. Jonathan..
: November 19, 2004 06:48
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Slade Henson wrote:
My
wife called me yesterday on my way to school and told me about this exchange
(with the "S" word). She was rolling on the floor, so to
speak.
I
was af
19, 2004 6:05
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
The 'liar' responds:Rather than ask you to
demonstrate wherein lies the lie; I'd like to ask our 'prodigal brother' to
compose a readable, relatively concise outline of the Gospel as he has come to
I'll neither wish nor hope for snow as I understand
that it's absence is work therefore, money. Thanks,
Lance the hopeful
- Original Message -
From:
Bill Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 08:27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
ï
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:08:41 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Judyt:I seem to recall having said to you and, to
Linda that I honestly believe both of you to be 'doers' of the Word. I further believe that, not unlike many on TT, it is POSSIBLE
that the 'account you giv
Seems to me like God used similar
terminology in the Bible, didn’t He? Izzy
I'd much rather deal with someone
like Terry even if he does use interesting terminology at
times. Our 2yr old grandson is
here today so I am hearing 'poo poo' a lot - Terry's version
is
Judy, I think this is a good example of
how we often misunderstand Lance simply because he talks much like “C3PO”
on Star Wars. I think he was not saying that you have not “arrived”.
I think he was saying that you should cite more scriptures in support of what
you said. (Now THAT’s inter
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 09:14
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Judy, I think this is
a good example of how we often misunderstand Lance simply because he talks
much like C3PO on Star Wars. I think he was not saying that you h
jt: Hi Bill Taylor, it's good to see you are still
around ...
Lance writes:
Question:What is the theological counterpart to
'The Theory of Everything'?
jt: Judy asks: What is the
"theory of everything and why is it important?"
Answer:The Incarnation
jt: Oh Good, you answered your o
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 09:14
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Judy, I think this
is a good example of how we often misunderstand Lance simply because he
talks much like C3PO on Star Wars. I thin
r
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 09:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
jt: Thanks for the interpretation Izzy. I used to
post more scripture but stopped because there was never any
response and it was a lot of work finding chapter
8:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
As to 'interpretation':You are correct on the former and
incorrect on the latter.
Ladies both:Your lives carry the day while your 'posts'
SOMETIMES do not. But, so could it be said of us a
ROFL!!!
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
I believe that naught will come from further pursuance of
this 'thread'.
In a message dated 11/19/2004 2:58:33 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My wife called me yesterday on my way to school and to
In a message dated 11/19/2004 3:54:50 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Question:What is the theological counterpart to 'The Theory of Everything'?
Answer:The Incarnation
It is well and wise to think of internal relations. Do not stop with the external. Indwel the Scriptures
In a message dated 11/19/2004 4:55:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After careful thought, there is no question that I could have chozen a better term to describe Lance;s comment than to call it dog doo doo. >From now on, when I read a lie on this list, I will simply call i
In a message dated 11/19/2004 6:24:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As to 'interpretation':You are correct on the former and incorrect on the latter.
Ladies both:Your lives carry the day while your 'posts' SOMETIMES do not. But, so could it be said of us all.(as to the 'po
John writes: I cna think of a number of
scriptures that support the above -- soo, why is it
imcumbant upon Lance to quote them.
Is it not enough that he incorporates the
scriptures as he understands them into his writings?
jt: No, so far as I'm concerned
it's not enough
Question:What is the theological
counterpart to 'The Theory of Everything'?
Answer:The Incarnation
It is well and wise to think
of internal relations. Do not stop with the external. Indwel the
Scriptures.
Example of 'internal'
thinking:Slade's post this morning.
I cna think of a n
27;s' forthcoming epistle.
> Beep Beep again
> - Original Message -
> From: Judy Taylor
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: November 19, 2004 09:42
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
>
>
> jt: Thanks for the inte
A good word, Suzy. Okay! :-) Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Petersen
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
When I signed up for Truth talk I was under the
I think that's what the Jman just
said.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 19, 2004 11:26
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
John writes: I cna think of a numb
.) Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
8:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
Seems to me like God used similar
terminology in the Bible, didn’t He? Izzy
I'd
Well, King James calls it DUNG
Jeff
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
10:47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
In a message dated 11/19/2004 4:55:05 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
Well said! By the by there's none of this in what church?
- Original Message -
From: "Susan Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: November 19, 2004 11:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
> When I signed up for Truth talk I w
mber, 2004
10.48To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?In a message dated 11/19/2004 4:55:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After careful thought, there is no question that I could have
chozen a better term to describe Lance;s comment than to c
1Kings 14, is that like,"You're pissing on my back and
telling me it's raining"?
Words of wit from Jeff, the decrepit juvinal
delinquit!
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
11:58
Sub
t: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:49
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Two Covenants?
Question:What is
the theological counterpart to 'The Theory of
Everything'?Answer:The
Incarnation
It
is well and wise to think of internal relations. Do not stop with the
extern
Susan Petersen wrote:
I am saddened by this. Instead of focussing on God's
Word, there is arguing and tearing down. If we truly
are the body of Christ, we need to start acting like
it. Please stop the finger pointing. "You did this."
"No, I didn't." or "You meant this." "No, I didn't."
Let's focus
-
> From: "Susan Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: November 19, 2004 11:50
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
>
>
> > When I signed up for Truth talk I was under the
> > impression that we would be talking abo
ak is over
:)
Jonathan Hughes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamilySent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:49
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Two Covenants?
Question:What
is the theological counterpart to 'T
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
