hi,
I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled supermount, but when
I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't mount automatically
did I miss something here?
Thanks
Hans
--
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
Hans Schippers
1LIC INF
UIA 2002-2003
signature.asc
Hi Dianne
"supermount -i -f=/etc/fstab enable" did the trick.
Thank you ever so much.
Regards
Ed
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 08:11 am, you wrote:
> hi
>
> i havent installed 8.2 yet. but i did have problems
> with supermount before and can share my experiences
> with it...1) maybe you can che
Hi All
I suspect this has been round before.I had'nt noticed it as I rarely use
a floppy these days.
But that friend noticed it ,( I suspect I have misspelt friend, in his
case maybe the "r" is missing).
I've checked my machines and they all do the same.
Which ever app uses the floppy drive first
After failing to get PartitionMagic to properly resize
my partitions, I gave up and reinstalled Mandrake 7,
rebuilding the partition table during setup.
Now, during initialization, it says
"fs type supermount not recognized by kernel"
and my cdrom and floppy drives require manual
mount/umount.
How
After trying to get supermount up and running for two days I've gotten this
far:
- compiled and installed 2.4.0-test11 with the supermount patch
- modified /etc/fstab with 'supermount -i enable*
After this I ran this command 'mount -t supermount -o fs=iso9660
dev=/dev/scd0,--, /mnt/dvdrom/' a
Downloaded 2.4.0-test11 and the supermount patch, compiled and installed
everything, just one problem.
I ran 'supermount -i enable' to modify /etc/fstab, this worked perfectly, but
I'm having problems understanding how exactly to use it. When I ran the mdk
kernel before (the first 30 minutes
Hi, I stuck 2.4.1 in tonight and realized I had forgotten about patches for
supermount. So in my search, I can no longer find the information on it. So
my question is:
Wasn't there a patch for kernel 2.4.1 that when applied gives it back it's
supermount capabilities? And from where might on
Hello:
I've compiled new kernel 2.4.6 in my MD 8.0 frequently #2, and now
I've lost supermount with all kernels (included 2.4.5-mdk). I used
"supermount -i enable"
but I can't get it back.
Any help?
PS: Someone knows where can I get supermount patch for 2.4.6 kernel.
Thanks for y
Hi all,
is supermount working flawlesly for anyone?
It works for every media and drive, but only for a few accesses. After a
few minutes directories cannot be listed.
When I disable supermount and mount everything manually, it works
without a hitch.
Anyone else is experiencing this?
--
Milos
Yes. Supermount is evil. This is the first thing i disable after an
install.
Rob
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SainTiss
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 AM
>> To: MDKexpert Mailing
&
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 13:03, Robert Wideman wrote:
> Yes. Supermount is evil. This is the first thing i disable after an
> install.
> Rob
What a usefull post.
To the original Poster:
Have you the right fstab entries for supermount ?
Have you made 'supermount -m
nstall.
> Rob
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SainTiss
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 AM
> >> To: MDKexpert Mailing
> >> Subject: [expert] supermount
I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but this is what I
got in fstab now:
none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
dev=/dev/scd1,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,users 0 0
I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but to
no avail...
Hans
On Wed, 20
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:37 pm, SainTiss wrote:
> Well, I reasoned that way too when I first installed 9.0, but the docs
> of the kernel-updates specifically mention supermount as being rewritten
> and fixed...
>
There must be some oddity about supermount, though. It works beautifully on
my bo
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:41 pm, SainTiss wrote:
> I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but this is what I
> got in fstab now:
>
> none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
> dev=/dev/scd1,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,users 0
> 0
>
Mine is
none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
d
cause a problem, just
frustration.
Rob
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 6:40 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [expert] supermount
>&g
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 6:47 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [expert] supermount
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:41 pm, SainTiss wrote:
>> > I enabled supermount through the MDK
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 13:46, Anne Wilson wrote:
> Mine is
> none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
> dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850,umask=0 0 0
>
> Maybe that 'user' is significant? It certainly works for me.
I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work ei
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:50 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> My problems is that when i want to eject the cdrom i cant do it b/c it auto
> mounts with supermount when i told it not to.
Tell me more - you're umounting from c/l I take it? I have noticed that
sometimes it can get picky (I'm normal
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:58 pm, SainTiss wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 13:46, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > Mine is
> > none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
> > dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850,umask=0 0
> > 0
> >
> > Maybe that 'user' is significant? It certainly works for me.
IL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:03 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [expert] supermount
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:50 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
>>
>> >
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work either...
> >
> Shot in the dark, Hans. I know some parts of this statement are
> position-sensitive, but I don't know which ones. Try moving the 'user'
> forward.
Didn't help eith
>> Didn't help either, but thanks for the tip...
>>
>> this is what I did to get it working:
>>
>> 1) upgrade kernel and reboot
>> 2) enable supermount in MDK CC
>> 3) check that supermount is loaded with lsmod
>> 4) put a cd in the cd-player
>> 5) wait and see nothing happen
>> 6) cd /mnt/cdrom2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 07:41 am, SainTiss wrote:
> I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but this is what I
> got in fstab now:
>
> none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
> dev=/dev/scd1,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,
Hmm, wait a minute...
I think I figured it out:
I seem to be able to mount /mnt/cdrom2 without a cd being in the
drive... And from the moment that's done, it all seems to work... if I
insert a cd, its contents are correctly displayed, I can eject it
without unmounting, and I can replace the cd a
to /etc/fstab or into another script to mount it on
> boot up or something.
> Rob
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:03 A
ilson
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 6:47 AM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: [expert] supermount
> >>
> >> On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:41 pm, SainTiss wrote:
> >> > I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but thi
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:03 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> Tell me more - you're umounting from c/l I take it? I have noticed that
> sometimes it can get picky (I'm normally in gui mode) if anything is reading
> the directory tree and may be reading the cds directory also. That just
> means
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:09 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> I dont remember, its been awhile since i have used supermount. Once i
> started having the probs a few months ago i disabled supermount after
> reading an article somewhere stating that it has been badly written or
> something to that effec
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:42 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:03 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > Tell me more - you're umounting from c/l I take it? I have noticed that
> > sometimes it can get picky (I'm normally in gui mode) if anything is
> > reading the directory tree an
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:21 pm, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> I love supermount. It works for me on 8.2 and 9.0. I have 2 cdroms (1
> cdrom, 1 cdburner). My working entry for my cd burner on /mnt/cdrom2 is:
>
> none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,
> ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:46 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> That fits with my experience. Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l you
> tend to upset it. Closing all, as you say, usually does it. One variatioon
> on your experience is that it may open and immediately close before you could
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 2:04 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>>. One
> > variatioon on your experience is that it may open and immediately close
> > before you could possibly remove the disk. It then automatically mounts
> > the disk again, and you are back at square one until you've found what's
>
SCNR???
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 09:04 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:46 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > That fits with my experience. Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l
> > you tend to upset it. Closing all, as you say, usually does it. One
> > variatioon on your exp
I just tried playing an audio-cd, and that works fine as well...
Hans
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:28, SainTiss wrote:
> Hmm, wait a minute...
>
> I think I figured it out:
>
> I seem to be able to mount /mnt/cdrom2 without a cd being in the
> drive... And from the moment that's done, it all seems
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:23 -0500, et wrote:
>
> SCNR???
Sorry Could Not Resist
(if you were asking for the meaning)
A kind of preventive measure when you know you may get spanked for
what you did or wrote. Most important lifesaving sentence in marital
life.
wobo
--
If you don't unders
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 09:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:23 -0500, et wrote:
> > SCNR???
>
> Sorry Could Not Resist
> (if you were asking for the meaning)
>
> A kind of preventive measure when you know you may get spanked for
> what you did or wrote. Most im
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 2:27 pm, SainTiss wrote:
> I just tried playing an audio-cd, and that works fine as well...
>
Sounds as though you're sorted, then. But - you told us how, now we need to
know why :) Anyone tell us?
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Want to buy your Pack or Ser
Sorry for coming in late.
> I seem to be able to mount /mnt/cdrom2 without a cd being in the
> drive...
Yes. once you have enabled supermount in the fstab, you have to call
"mount /mnt/cdrom2" to actually activate it.
>And from the moment that's done, it all seems to work... if I
> insert a c
>
> That fits with my experience. Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l
> you tend to upset it. Closing all, as you say, usually does it. One
> variatioon on your experience is that it may open and immediately close
> before you could possibly remove the disk. It then automatically mounts
>
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:33, Damian Gatabria wrote:
>
> > so that would mean I should just remove the "noauto" from fstab, and I
> > should be fine?
>
> "noauto" is a parameter that means that this drive is NOT included in the list
> when you tell the fstab to mount everything. for example, when
SainTiss
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 AM
> >> To: MDKexpert Mailing
> >> Subject: [expert] supermount
> >>
> >>
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled supermount, b
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:40 pm, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> > That fits with my experience. Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l
> > you tend to upset it. Closing all, as you say, usually does it. One
> > variatioon on your experience is that it may open and immediately close
> > before you
SainTiss wrote:
> hi,
>
> I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled
> supermount, but when I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't
> mount automatically did I miss something here?
>
> Thanks
>
> Hans
you need to reboot the computer after doing a 'supermount -i
enable' to get supermount to rea
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 12:32 pm, Alan Shoemaker wrote:
> you need to reboot the computer after doing a 'supermount -i
> enable' to get supermount to read the fstab file.
I think you can do a "mount -a" and get away with the same thing
without rebooting...
--
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 07:39 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> There must be some oddity about supermount, though. It works beautifully
> on my box, yet others have endless problems. Of course, it may be that
> other customisation/choices are affecting it - don't know about that.
>
> Anne
Ditto h
Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 February 2003 12:32 pm, Alan Shoemaker
wrote:
> > you need to reboot the computer after doing a 'supermount
> > -i enable' to get supermount to read the fstab file.
>
> I think you can do a "mount -a" and get away with
> the same thing without rebooting...
SainTiss wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:58:18PM +0100 :
> hi,
>
> I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled supermount, but when
> I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't mount automatically
> did I miss something here?
Paste your /etc/fstab. Paste the results of 'mount'. Paste the result
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anne Wilson wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:46:54PM + :
> >
> > I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but to
> > no avail...
> I couldn't figure that one out either.
The options that come before the -- are for supermoun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anne Wilson wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:39:49PM + :
> > Well, I reasoned that way too when I first installed 9.0, but the docs
> > of the kernel-updates specifically mention supermount as being rewritten
> > and fixed...
> There must be some o
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 10:31 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Anne Wilson wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:46:54PM + :
> > > I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but to
> > > no avail...
> >
> > I couldn't figure that one
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 06:17 am, SainTiss wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work either...
> >
> > Shot in the dark, Hans. I know some parts of this statement are
> > position-sensitive, but I don't know wh
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 20:50, Lorne wrote:
> > 5) wait and see nothing happen
> > 6) cd /mnt/cdrom2 and nothing happens...
> >
> Ummm I know this is a terribly stupid question but did you do an ls
> /mnt/cdrom2? The supermount stuff is black magic and I don't think I like it
> at all, but for me
I am running 8.2 with the cooker kernel. With the old kernel, I had no
problems accessing cd's but now I get "Stale NFS file handle" when I try
to ls under the cdrom directory.
Is this a known bug? Is there a known fix?
Darren
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to h
On Monday 06 Oct 2003 9:16 am, Richard Bown wrote:
> Hi All
> I suspect this has been round before.I had'nt noticed it as I
> rarely use a floppy these days.
> But that friend noticed it ,( I suspect I have misspelt friend, in
> his case maybe the "r" is missing).
>
> I've checked my machines and t
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 10:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 06 Oct 2003 9:16 am, Richard Bown wrote:
> > Hi All
> > I suspect this has been round before.I had'nt noticed it as I
> > rarely use a floppy these days.
> > But that friend noticed it ,( I suspect I have misspelt friend, in
> > his case m
Hi
Replying to Anne
I had user missing from that line , so I added it and rebooted.
Exactly the same happens, even tried killing nautilus.
So I changed the fstab entry to ext3
mtools works so does win4lin :)
If I manually mount the floppy drive Nautilus can see the contents but
mtools and win
Seems i've lost supermount capacity in some manner, and i can't retrieve it.
I've the last kernel 2.2.16-4, with supermount as a module, and a
correct fstab, but no way. I can load the module manually, using lsmod, so it's
not a conf.modules problem either. So, what is wrong ?
--
Guillaume Rous
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 11:19:12PM +0100, Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]
wrote:
> Downloaded 2.4.0-test11 and the supermount patch, compiled and installed
> everything, just one problem.
>
> So, how do I "enable" supermount after having modifed my file system?
supermount needs to be
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno] wrote:
> After trying to get supermount up and running for two days I've gotten this
> far:
>
> - compiled and installed 2.4.0-test11 with the supermount patch
> - modified /etc/fstab with 'supermount -i enable*
>
> After this I ran thi
On Tuesday 05 December 2000 12:35, you wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 11:19:12PM +0100, Christian A Strømmen
[Number1/NumeroUno] wrote:
> > Downloaded 2.4.0-test11 and the supermount patch, compiled and installed
> > everything, just one problem.
> >
> > So, how do I "enable" supermount after h
Submitted 05-Dec-00 by Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]:
> It HAS to be a module? I just built it in the kernel... Can't find anywhere
> in the README that it HAS to be a module.. :)
Supermount in and of itself doesn't need to be a module, however your
initscripts assume it will be an
On Tuesday 05 December 2000 16:11, Anton Graham wrote:
> Submitted 05-Dec-00 by Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]:
> > It HAS to be a module? I just built it in the kernel... Can't find
> > anywhere in the README that it HAS to be a module.. :)
>
> Supermount in and of itself doesn't need
Submitted 06-Dec-00 by Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]:
>> Supermount in and of itself doesn't need to be a module, however your
>> initscripts assume it will be and disable it at boot time if they can't
>> find the module. (I sent in a patch before the 7.2 beta cycle but it
>> wasn't in
Hi all!
I am using the mandrake kernel 2.2.17 with supermount
activated (I have tried compiling it into the kernel and
as a module)
I have the following problem:
*) if I cd to a (super)mounted directory on a floppy(e.g.
/mnt/floppy/XYZ/ where /mnt/floppy is the mount point for
the flo
Hoyt wrote:
On Saturday 07 July 2001 11:52 am, you methodically organized electrons to state:
Hello:I've compiled new kernel 2.4.6 in my MD 8.0 frequently #2, and nowI've lost supermount with all kernels (included 2.4.5-mdk). I used"supermount -i enable"but I can't get it back.Any
emount them... and if you have done the
> supermount -i enable
> you should be off and running..
>
>
> let us know if it works...
>
>
>
> rgds
>
> Frank
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Prae
you just have to unmount and remount them... and if you have done the
> supermount -i enable
> you should be off and running..
>
>
> let us know if it works...
>
>
>
> rgds
>
> Frank
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Es Dissabte 26 Gener 2002 00:41, en Praedor Tempus va escriure:
> I have kernel-2.4.17 and have tried activating supermount. I did
> "supermount -i enable" and then edited fstab to be "correct" - it has
> entries identical to yours. I stick a floppy in and try to view it
> and...pop, only root c
Damnit. My entries are essentially the same, as would
be expected having run "supermount -i enable" myself.
What I get whenever I try to view/mount one of these
mounts is a message that only root can mount those
filesystems.
--- Joan Tur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Es Dissabte 26 Gener 2002
Saturday, January 26, 2002, 7:54:17 PM, you wrote:
PT> Damnit. My entries are essentially the same, as would
PT> be expected having run "supermount -i enable" myself.
PT> What I get whenever I try to view/mount one of these
PT> mounts is a message that only root can mount those
PT> filesystems
Yes we have seen this as well.
On Mandrake 8.2 as well.
The manual mount clears the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Milos Prudek [mailto:milos.prudek@;tiscali.cz]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] supermount unreliable
Hi all,
is
Yes we have seen this as well.
On Mandrake 8.2 as well.
The manual mount clears the problem.
Absolutely.
Is there no way to make supermount work?
--
Milos Prudek
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 11:53 am, Milos Prudek wrote:
> > Yes we have seen this as well.
> > On Mandrake 8.2 as well.
> > The manual mount clears the problem.
>
> Absolutely.
>
> Is there no way to make supermount work?
Since it works fine for me o
Milos Prudek wrote on Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:53:37PM +0200 :
> >Yes we have seen this as well.
> >On Mandrake 8.2 as well.
> >The manual mount clears the problem.
> Is there no way to make supermount work?
The code for supermount itself is fairly clean and straightforward. But
how to make the k
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:todd@;mandrakesoft.com]On Behalf Of
Todd Lyons
Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 1:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] supermount unreliable
Milos Prudek wrote on Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:53:37PM +0200 :
> >Yes w
;mandrakesoft.com]On Behalf Of
> Todd Lyons
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 1:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] supermount unreliable
>
>
> Milos Prudek wrote on Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:53:37PM +0200 :
> > >Yes we have seen this as well.
> &g
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 11:53 am, Milos Prudek wrote:
> > Yes we have seen this as well.
> > On Mandrake 8.2 as well.
> > The manual mount clears the problem.
>
> Absolutely.
>
> Is there no way to make supermount work?
Just another note on supermount. I am using 8.2 with a self-built kernel
2
Praedor Tempus wrote on Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:05:55AM -0500 :
> >
> > Is there no way to make supermount work?
> Just another note on supermount. I am using 8.2 with a self-built kernel
> 2.4.19-9mdk. Supermount works fine on this system. Perhaps the 2.4.19
> kernel in 9.0 is re-broken for su
k on for you.
Joeb
p.s. if you have tried enabling it, then forgive this question!
---Original Message---
From: SainTiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 02/05/03 06:37 AM
To: MDKexpert Mailing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [expert] supermount
>
> Well, I reasoned that w
I just upgraded my system from 8.0 to 8.2, and I'm having trouble
finding supermount. Could somebody let me know what the package name
is, and what CD it's on?
Thanks,
- Theo
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Monday July 29 2002 07:11 pm, Darren King wrote:
> I am running 8.2 with the cooker kernel. With the old kernel, I had
> no problems accessing cd's but now I get "Stale NFS file handle" when
> I try to ls under the cdrom directory.
>
> Is this a known bug? Is there a known fix?
>
> Darren
Dear experts,
Recently I am having a problem ejecting a Zip disk. I use supermounting and
the mounting part works ok: I can see files on the zip after I plug it in.
However, it doesn't want to eject: the eject button is ignored until I log
out of KDE, only then I get my disk back. It seems the
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Seems i've lost supermount capacity in some manner, and i can't retrieve it.
> I've the last kernel 2.2.16-4, with supermount as a module, and a
> correct fstab, but no way. I can load the module manually, using lsmod, so it's
> not a conf.modules problem either. So, wha
Also sprach mar, 20 jun 2000 :
> Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>
> > Seems i've lost supermount capacity in some manner, and i can't retrieve it.
> > I've the last kernel 2.2.16-4, with supermount as a module, and a
> > correct fstab, but no way. I can load the module manually, using lsmod, so it's
> >
Hi,
I've got a problem after Freqing my 8.0 install
If I've got a CDROM in the drive at boot, it mounts OK,
But if I try to change the CD I get the following shoing in my logs
Jul 2 00:01:58 darkwing kernel: cdrom: open failed.
Jul 2 00:01:58 darkwing kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 02:00
Supermount and this kernel works fine with my cdrom drive, zip drive
and floppy disk drive. Actually, my CD drive is a dvdrom drive. How
do I set up fstab to detect both a dvd or cdrom?
Bill
--
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati"
(When all else fails, play dead!)
Want to buy your Pack or Services
Whenever I shut down, I get this annoying error message about "hdc" and
the other day when I tried to eject my pcmcia cards, I received the
following message in /var/log/messages. Anyone have any idea what might
be going on? I'm running mdk 2.2.16-9 on a Gateway 9100 laptop.
-ben
Aug 3 11:37:
Theo,
There are no packages - it's part of the kernel. It's just a matter of
whether it's switched on or not. Your lilo settings handle this. Look
at /etc/lilo.conf
If your linux boot stanza includes "devfs=mount" then it's on. If it's
"devfs=nomount" then it's off. Switch it on or off as y
I just had an interesting experience with supermount and usb-storage.
Perhaps someone can give me some help.
I have a MS-Natural-Pro keyboard with integrated usb hub. I also have a
"universal smart drive" keychain 32M flash usb "drive". I decided to
try to use it with supermount. For the m
Aleksey Naumov wrote on Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 05:52:37PM -0400 :
> Dear experts,
>
> Recently I am having a problem ejecting a Zip disk. I use supermounting and
> the mounting part works ok: I can see files on the zip after I plug it in.
> However, it doesn't want to eject: the eject button is i
Todd,
I am afraid, my problem is more serious and is not KDE-specific. Just tried
Gnome and get exactly the same bundle of problems as in KDE: zip is not
mounted properly, what file browsers as well as 'ls -ll' show me is NOT
what's on the disk!
I plug in a disk, but the file tree I see on it
Aleksey Naumov wrote on Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 06:45:13PM -0400 :
> Todd,
>
> I recall now it started to go haywire after I installed a local printer with
> HardDrake. The printer also stopped working properly very soon after the
> installation (maybe when I accessed the zip...). So, the real pro
Todd Lyons wrote:
> Aleksey Naumov wrote on Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 06:45:13PM
-0400 :
> > Todd,
> >
> > I recall now it started to go haywire after I installed a
> > local printer with HardDrake. The printer also stopped
> > working properly very soon after the installation (maybe
> > when I access
On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 00:46, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Friday 27 September 2002 08:59 pm, you wrote:
>
> > there were zip issues with 8.2. i ended up replacing the zip
> > drive line in fstab with a regular line and creating a new
> > desktop icon based on the cdrom link (so it has an eject
> >
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 18:10, Todd Lyons wrote:
> > However, it doesn't want to eject: the eject button is ignored until I log
> > out of KDE, only then I get my disk back. It seems the unmounting part is not
> > working?
>
> This is a KDE issue. There's nothing you can do about it because that
FWIW: I noticed my cdrom acting flakey under KDE (it would eject when I
pressed the button, but then immediately retract...) and the 'Eject' option
on the icon didn't work. Since this is an upgraded system (MDK 8.2 -> MDK
9.0), I deleted the icon and re-created it--and it seems to work just f
On Saturday 28 September 2002 02:12 am, you wrote:
> DL,
>
> I know we've been over this before, you and I, but have you tried
> checking out supermount under LM90 yet?
Nope, not yet - was gonna wait for the full release version (I have more luck
with those)
> I thought I'd give it a whirl sin
020928 various people wrote:
> the eject button is ignored until I log out of KDE:
> only then I get my disk back. It seems the unmounting part is not working?
---
> This is a KDE issue.
---
> I've installed "winblows replacement" systems for friends using KDE
> and seen the mount problems. Esp
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
