[expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread SainTiss
hi,

I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled supermount, but when
I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't mount automatically
did I miss something here?

Thanks

Hans

-- 
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?

Hans Schippers
1LIC INF
UIA 2002-2003



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[expert] Supermount

2002-03-26 Thread Eduardo M. A. M. Mendes

Hi Dianne

"supermount  -i -f=/etc/fstab enable" did the trick.

Thank you ever so much.

Regards

Ed



On Tuesday 26 March 2002 08:11 am, you wrote:
> hi
>
> i havent installed 8.2 yet. but i did have problems
> with supermount before and can share my experiences
> with it...1) maybe you can check if the new version of
> initscripts was actually updated during your upgrade.
> that rpm is where supermount command is bundled with.
> 2) you can also do a 'supermount enable' to check if
> its just not enabled.
>
> also, note that supermount must be supported on the
> kernel level to make it work. this feature is only
> available on mandrake kernels. you cant compile your
> own kernel from kernel.org and expect supermount to
> work. its not supported on the vanilla kernels.
>
> btw, not all the mandrake-UPDATE kernels support it. i
> noticed that kernels that came with the release
> support it but not on all the kernel-updates.
> **emphasize on the update** ...
>
> hth
> dianne



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] supermount

2003-10-06 Thread Richard Bown
Hi All
I suspect this has been round before.I had'nt noticed it as I rarely use
a floppy these days.
But that friend noticed it ,( I suspect I have misspelt friend, in his
case maybe the "r" is missing).

I've checked my machines and they all do the same.
Which ever app uses the floppy drive first time dos'nt release it, so
the next time its used with a different app you get the error message
that the device is busy.

eg. when starting with nautilus then win4lin or mtools

Whats the preferred option in fstab for the floppy ?

WM = gnome

Thanks 
Richard


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Supermount

2000-03-13 Thread Mage Grimau

After failing to get PartitionMagic to properly resize
my partitions, I gave up and reinstalled Mandrake 7,
rebuilding the partition table during setup.
Now, during initialization, it says
"fs type supermount not recognized by kernel"
and my cdrom and floppy drives require manual
mount/umount.
How can I get supermount to work? 
Since I work from inside KDE and BlackBox, it's a pain
to have to keep typing mount/umount every time I
change a floppy or CD.

=
Mage Grimau, Strange Unwashed & Somewhat Slightly Dazed
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com



[expert] Supermount

2000-12-04 Thread Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]

After trying to get supermount up and running for two days I've gotten this 
far:

- compiled and installed 2.4.0-test11 with the supermount patch
- modified /etc/fstab with 'supermount -i enable*

After this I ran this command 'mount -t supermount -o fs=iso9660 
dev=/dev/scd0,--, /mnt/dvdrom/'  after this I try to enter the dvdrom 
directory, but get this error no matter what cd I put in: 'bash: cd: dvdrom/: 
Input/output error'

Anybody that has any clue what I'm doing wrong?


-- 
\ Christian A Strømmen /
\ Number1/NumeroUno @ Undernet - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
\ Web: www.realityx.net - Cell: +47 911 43 948 /
   Live your life by your dreams,
 not by the limits of reality...



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Supermount

2000-12-04 Thread Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]

Downloaded 2.4.0-test11 and the supermount patch, compiled and installed 
everything, just one problem.

I ran 'supermount -i enable' to modify /etc/fstab, this worked perfectly, but 
I'm having problems understanding how exactly to use it.  When I ran the mdk 
kernel before (the first 30 minutes after install, I have been running devel 
kernels the last years) it worked automagically.  I just poped a cd in the 
drive and *tada*... it was mounted!  Went back to the supermount homepage, 
but I couldn't really understand the readme there, just got more confused.

So, how do I "enable" supermount after having modifed my file system?

-- 
\ Christian A Strømmen /
\ Number1/NumeroUno @ Undernet - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
\ Web: www.realityx.net - Cell: +47 911 43 948 /
   Live your life by your dreams,
 not by the limits of reality...



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Supermount

2001-02-04 Thread s

Hi, I stuck 2.4.1 in tonight and realized I had forgotten about patches for 
supermount.  So in my search, I can no longer find the information on it.  So 
my question is:

Wasn't there a patch for kernel 2.4.1 that when applied gives it back it's 
supermount capabilities?  And from where might one download it?

Thanx,
-s




[expert] Supermount

2001-07-07 Thread Fedneg

Hello:

I've compiled new kernel 2.4.6 in my MD 8.0 frequently #2, and now
I've lost supermount with all kernels (included 2.4.5-mdk). I used 
"supermount -i enable"
but I can't get it back.
Any help?


PS: Someone knows where can I get supermount patch for 2.4.6 kernel.


Thanks for your information.


   Fedneg





[expert] supermount unreliable

2002-10-22 Thread Milos Prudek
Hi all,

is supermount working flawlesly for anyone?

It works for every media and drive, but only for a few accesses. After a 
few minutes directories cannot be listed.

When I disable supermount and mount everything manually, it works 
without a hitch.

Anyone else is experiencing this?

--
Milos Prudek


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Robert Wideman
Yes.  Supermount is evil.  This is the first thing i disable after an
install.
Rob

>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SainTiss
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 AM
>> To: MDKexpert Mailing
>> Subject: [expert] supermount
>>
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled supermount, but when
>> I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't mount automatically
>> did I miss something here?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Hans
>>
>> --
>> In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
>>
>> Hans Schippers
>> 1LIC INF
>> UIA 2002-2003
>>



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 13:03, Robert Wideman wrote:
> Yes.  Supermount is evil.  This is the first thing i disable after an
> install.
> Rob


What a usefull post. 

To the original Poster:

Have you the right fstab entries for supermount ?
Have you made 'supermount -m '

-- 
Regards
Steffen

counter.li.org : #296567.
machine: 181800
vdr-box : 87

Please dont CC me, since if I have replied I'll watch the tread. Both mails 
will be filtered to the ML-folder. Thanks


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread SainTiss
Well, I reasoned that way too when I first installed 9.0, but the docs
of the kernel-updates specifically mention supermount as being rewritten
and fixed...

Hans

On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 13:03, Robert Wideman wrote:
> Yes.  Supermount is evil.  This is the first thing i disable after an
> install.
> Rob
> 
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SainTiss
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 AM
> >> To: MDKexpert Mailing
> >> Subject: [expert] supermount
> >>
> >>
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled supermount, but when
> >> I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't mount automatically
> >> did I miss something here?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Hans
> >>
> >> --
> >> In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
> >>
> >> Hans Schippers
> >> 1LIC INF
> >> UIA 2002-2003
> >>
> 
> 
> 
> __
> 
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?

Hans Schippers
1LIC INF
UIA 2002-2003



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread SainTiss
I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but this is what I
got in fstab now:

none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
dev=/dev/scd1,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,users 0 0

I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but to
no avail...

Hans

On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 13:20, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 February 2003 13:03, Robert Wideman wrote:
> > Yes.  Supermount is evil.  This is the first thing i disable after an
> > install.
> > Rob
> 
> 
> What a usefull post. 
> 
> To the original Poster:
> 
> Have you the right fstab entries for supermount ?
> Have you made 'supermount -m '
-- 
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?

Hans Schippers
1LIC INF
UIA 2002-2003



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:37 pm, SainTiss wrote:
> Well, I reasoned that way too when I first installed 9.0, but the docs
> of the kernel-updates specifically mention supermount as being rewritten
> and fixed...
>
There must be some oddity about supermount, though.  It works beautifully on 
my box, yet others have endless problems.  Of course, it may be that other 
customisation/choices are affecting it - don't know about that.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:41 pm, SainTiss wrote:
> I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but this is what I
> got in fstab now:
>
> none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
> dev=/dev/scd1,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,users 0
> 0
>
Mine is 
none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850,umask=0 0 0

Maybe that 'user' is significant?  It certainly works for me.

> I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but to
> no avail...
>
I couldn't figure that one out either.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Robert Wideman
Anne, am in a good mood nowhehe.

My problems is that when i want to eject the cdrom i cant do it b/c it auto
mounts with supermount when i told it not to.  Also certain apps require
cdrom NOT mounted...then supermount takes command, AAA.
This is just my frustration with it, doesnt really cause a problem, just
frustration.
Rob

>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 6:40 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [expert] supermount
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:37 pm, SainTiss wrote:
>> > Well, I reasoned that way too when I first installed 9.0, but the docs
>> > of the kernel-updates specifically mention supermount as being
>> rewritten
>> > and fixed...
>> >
>> There must be some oddity about supermount, though.  It works
>> beautifully on
>> my box, yet others have endless problems.  Of course, it may be
>> that other
>> customisation/choices are affecting it - don't know about that.
>>
>> Anne
>> --
>> Registered Linux User No.293302
>>
>>
>>



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Robert Wideman
Mine with "supermount -i disable" used after install.
/dev/scd0   /mnt/cdrom  auto
codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,noauto,nosuid,ro,umask=0,user,nodev   0
0
/dev/scd1   /mnt/cdrom2 auto
codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,noauto,nosuid,ro,umask=0,user,nodev   0
0
/dev/fd0/mnt/floppy auto
iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,sync,unhide,noauto,nosuid,umask=0,user,node
v  0 0
Yes, i have an all scsi system.  If it were IDE it would be /dev/hdb or hdc
or something.
Rob

>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 6:47 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [expert] supermount
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:41 pm, SainTiss wrote:
>> > I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but this is what I
>> > got in fstab now:
>> >
>> > none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
>> >
>> dev=/dev/scd1,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noau
>> to,users 0
>> > 0
>> >
>> Mine is
>> none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
>> dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850,u
>> mask=0 0 0
>>
>> Maybe that 'user' is significant?  It certainly works for me.
>>
>> > I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but to
>> > no avail...
>> >
>> I couldn't figure that one out either.
>>
>> Anne
>> --
>> Registered Linux User No.293302
>>
>>
>>



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread SainTiss
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 13:46, Anne Wilson wrote:

> Mine is 
> none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
> dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850,umask=0 0 0
> 
> Maybe that 'user' is significant?  It certainly works for me.

I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work either...

Hans


-- 
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?

Hans Schippers
1LIC INF
UIA 2002-2003



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:50 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:

> My problems is that when i want to eject the cdrom i cant do it b/c it auto
> mounts with supermount when i told it not to.  

Tell me more - you're umounting from c/l I take it?  I have noticed that 
sometimes it can get picky (I'm normally in gui mode) if anything is reading 
the directory tree and may be reading the cds directory also.  That just 
means that I  have to be careful that I have no Kinq windows or terminals 
that might by using it - no prob once I realised.

> Also certain apps require
> cdrom NOT mounted...then supermount takes command, AAA.
> This is just my frustration with it, doesnt really cause a problem, just
> frustration.

Yes - I thought of experimenting with udf, but for that I would have to get 
rid of supermount, I think.  In fact, I wouldn't think I could use auto mode 
either.  Haven't entirely thought it through yet, but I would think my only 
option is to mount/umount from c/l every time.  I'm hanging fire on this one.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:58 pm, SainTiss wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 13:46, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > Mine is
> > none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
> > dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850,umask=0 0
> > 0
> >
> > Maybe that 'user' is significant?  It certainly works for me.
>
> I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work either...
>
Shot in the dark, Hans.  I know some parts of this statement are 
position-sensitive, but I don't know which ones.  Try moving the 'user' 
forward.

Apart from that I can't see any obvious difference between your and mine.  
Except that you have 'ro' and I don't.  But then mine is cd-rw, whereas the 
cd-dvd does have 'ro'.  Sorry, no more ideas.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Robert Wideman
I dont remember, its been awhile since i have used supermount.  Once i
started having the probs a few months ago i disabled supermount after
reading an article somewhere stating that it has been badly written or
something to that effect that it is a non-worthy app.  Personally i would
not like it automounted, i even disabled autofs when MDK used it.  So i just
do use any automounting features anymore.  If i want something mounted at
boot then i put it into /etc/fstab or into another script to mount it on
boot up or something.
Rob

>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:03 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [expert] supermount
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:50 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
>>
>> > My problems is that when i want to eject the cdrom i cant do
>> it b/c it auto
>> > mounts with supermount when i told it not to.
>>
>> Tell me more - you're umounting from c/l I take it?  I have noticed that
>> sometimes it can get picky (I'm normally in gui mode) if
>> anything is reading
>> the directory tree and may be reading the cds directory also.  That just
>> means that I  have to be careful that I have no Kinq windows or
>> terminals
>> that might by using it - no prob once I realised.
>>
>> > Also certain apps require
>> > cdrom NOT mounted...then supermount takes command, AAA.
>> > This is just my frustration with it, doesnt really cause a
>> problem, just
>> > frustration.
>>
>> Yes - I thought of experimenting with udf, but for that I would
>> have to get
>> rid of supermount, I think.  In fact, I wouldn't think I could
>> use auto mode
>> either.  Haven't entirely thought it through yet, but I would
>> think my only
>> option is to mount/umount from c/l every time.  I'm hanging fire
>> on this one.
>>
>> Anne
>> --
>> Registered Linux User No.293302
>>
>>
>>



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread SainTiss
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:08, Anne Wilson wrote:

> > I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work either...
> >
> Shot in the dark, Hans.  I know some parts of this statement are 
> position-sensitive, but I don't know which ones.  Try moving the 'user' 
> forward.

Didn't help either, but thanks for the tip...

this is what I did to get it working:

1) upgrade kernel and reboot
2) enable supermount in MDK CC
3) check that supermount is loaded with lsmod
4) put a cd in the cd-player
5) wait and see nothing happen
6) cd /mnt/cdrom2 and nothing happens...

Hans


-- 
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?

Hans Schippers
1LIC INF
UIA 2002-2003



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


RE: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Robert Wideman
>> Didn't help either, but thanks for the tip...
>> 
>> this is what I did to get it working:
>> 
>> 1) upgrade kernel and reboot
>> 2) enable supermount in MDK CC
>> 3) check that supermount is loaded with lsmod
>> 4) put a cd in the cd-player
>> 5) wait and see nothing happen
>> 6) cd /mnt/cdrom2 and nothing happens...


Is the application able to autoplay a cd upon insertion?
Rob


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Praedor Tempus Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 05 February 2003 07:41 am, SainTiss wrote:
> I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but this is what I
> got in fstab now:
>
> none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
> dev=/dev/scd1,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,users 0
> 0

I love supermount.  It works for me on 8.2 and 9.0.  I have 2 cdroms (1 cdrom, 
1 cdburner).  My working entry for my cd burner on /mnt/cdrom2 is:

none  /mnt/cdrom2  supermount dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto, 
ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,umask=0 0 0

praedor
- -- 
Conservatives of all times are adventitious liars.
- - Friedrich Nietzsche.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+QQ/l1i/6R1B/Yh0RAu3IAJ9FqMPx+eOp+axEFy09LsMEdfv8hwCeIi9T
mwKjhFW4CvjMik1rGegLl+8=
=NRJf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread SainTiss
Hmm, wait a minute...

I think I figured it out: 

I seem to be able to mount /mnt/cdrom2 without a cd being in the
drive... And from the moment that's done, it all seems to work... if I
insert a cd, its contents are correctly displayed, I can eject it
without unmounting, and I can replace the cd and it will detect that and
get its contents right again...

so that would mean I should just remove the "noauto" from fstab, and I
should be fine?

Is that how it works?

Thanks

Hans

On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:17, SainTiss wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
> 
> > > I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work either...
> > >
> > Shot in the dark, Hans.  I know some parts of this statement are 
> > position-sensitive, but I don't know which ones.  Try moving the 'user' 
> > forward.
> 
> Didn't help either, but thanks for the tip...
> 
> this is what I did to get it working:
> 
> 1) upgrade kernel and reboot
> 2) enable supermount in MDK CC
> 3) check that supermount is loaded with lsmod
> 4) put a cd in the cd-player
> 5) wait and see nothing happen
> 6) cd /mnt/cdrom2 and nothing happens...
> 
> Hans
-- 
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?

Hans Schippers
1LIC INF
UIA 2002-2003



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread et
music CDs do not get mounted, just played

On Wednesday 05 February 2003 08:09 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> I dont remember, its been awhile since i have used supermount.  Once i
> started having the probs a few months ago i disabled supermount after
> reading an article somewhere stating that it has been badly written or
> something to that effect that it is a non-worthy app.  Personally i would
> not like it automounted, i even disabled autofs when MDK used it.  So i
> just do use any automounting features anymore.  If i want something mounted
> at boot then i put it into /etc/fstab or into another script to mount it on
> boot up or something.
> Rob
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:03 AM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: [expert] supermount
> >>
> >> On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:50 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> > My problems is that when i want to eject the cdrom i cant do
> >>
> >> it b/c it auto
> >>
> >> > mounts with supermount when i told it not to.
> >>
> >> Tell me more - you're umounting from c/l I take it?  I have noticed that
> >> sometimes it can get picky (I'm normally in gui mode) if
> >> anything is reading
> >> the directory tree and may be reading the cds directory also.  That just
> >> means that I  have to be careful that I have no Kinq windows or
> >> terminals
> >> that might by using it - no prob once I realised.
> >>
> >> > Also certain apps require
> >> > cdrom NOT mounted...then supermount takes command, AAA.
> >> > This is just my frustration with it, doesnt really cause a
> >>
> >> problem, just
> >>
> >> > frustration.
> >>
> >> Yes - I thought of experimenting with udf, but for that I would
> >> have to get
> >> rid of supermount, I think.  In fact, I wouldn't think I could
> >> use auto mode
> >> either.  Haven't entirely thought it through yet, but I would
> >> think my only
> >> option is to mount/umount from c/l every time.  I'm hanging fire
> >> on this one.
> >>
> >> Anne
> >> --
> >> Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread et
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 07:53 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> Mine with "supermount -i disable" used after install.
> /dev/scd0   /mnt/cdrom  auto
> codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,noauto,nosuid,ro,umask=0,user,nodev  
> 0 0
> /dev/scd1   /mnt/cdrom2 auto
> codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,noauto,nosuid,ro,umask=0,user,nodev  
> 0 0
> /dev/fd0/mnt/floppy auto
> iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,sync,unhide,noauto,nosuid,umask=0,user,nod
>e v  0 0
> Yes, i have an all scsi system.  If it were IDE it would be /dev/hdb or hdc
> or something.
> Rob
you can still have scd points with an IDE cdrom, with scsi emulatio scd0 is a 
valid device for a /dev/scd*

>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 6:47 AM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: [expert] supermount
> >>
> >> On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:41 pm, SainTiss wrote:
> >> > I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but this is what
> >> > I got in fstab now:
> >> >
> >> > none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
> >>
> >> dev=/dev/scd1,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noau
> >> to,users 0
> >>
> >> > 0
> >>
> >> Mine is
> >> none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
> >> dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850,u
> >> mask=0 0 0
> >>
> >> Maybe that 'user' is significant?  It certainly works for me.
> >>
> >> > I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but
> >> > to no avail...
> >>
> >> I couldn't figure that one out either.
> >>
> >> Anne
> >> --
> >> Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:03 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> 
> Tell me more - you're umounting from c/l I take it?  I have noticed that 
> sometimes it can get picky (I'm normally in gui mode) if anything is reading 
> the directory tree and may be reading the cds directory also.  That just 
> means that I  have to be careful that I have no Kinq windows or terminals 
> that might by using it - no prob once I realised.

This reminds me:

Normally I mount via CLI and use mc or just the CLI on a CD (rpm or mv
or ls, etc.). Just the other day I used the CD icon on the KDE desktop
and konqueror opened with the contents of the CD. I looked at it and
closed konqueror. Next time i tried to open the drive it did not. So I
did an 'umount /mnt/cdrom' but it told me that the device was in use.

I had to open Konqueror, change to a different directory and close
Konqueror. Then I was able to open the drive.

So Konqueror saves it's status somewhere when you close it. If you
close it with the contents of a CD on display your CD remains 'in
use'.

wobo 
-- 
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:09 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> I dont remember, its been awhile since i have used supermount.  Once i
> started having the probs a few months ago i disabled supermount after
> reading an article somewhere stating that it has been badly written or
> something to that effect that it is a non-worthy app. 

Heck - if you read it, it must be true 

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:42 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:03 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > Tell me more - you're umounting from c/l I take it?  I have noticed that
> > sometimes it can get picky (I'm normally in gui mode) if anything is
> > reading the directory tree and may be reading the cds directory also. 
> > That just means that I  have to be careful that I have no Kinq windows or
> > terminals that might by using it - no prob once I realised.
>
> This reminds me:
>
> Normally I mount via CLI and use mc or just the CLI on a CD (rpm or mv
> or ls, etc.). Just the other day I used the CD icon on the KDE desktop
> and konqueror opened with the contents of the CD. I looked at it and
> closed konqueror. Next time i tried to open the drive it did not. So I
> did an 'umount /mnt/cdrom' but it told me that the device was in use.
>
> I had to open Konqueror, change to a different directory and close
> Konqueror. Then I was able to open the drive.
>
> So Konqueror saves it's status somewhere when you close it. If you
> close it with the contents of a CD on display your CD remains 'in
> use'.
>
> wobo

That fits with my experience.  Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l you 
tend to upset it.  Closing all, as you say, usually does it.  One variatioon 
on your experience is that it may open and immediately close before you could 
possibly remove the disk.  It then automatically mounts the disk again, and 
you are back at square one until you've found what's bugging it.   I just 
make sure everything's closed, now.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:21 pm, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
> I love supermount.  It works for me on 8.2 and 9.0.  I have 2 cdroms (1
> cdrom, 1 cdburner).  My working entry for my cd burner on /mnt/cdrom2 is:
>
> none  /mnt/cdrom2  supermount dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,
> ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,umask=0 0 0
>
ro on a burner?

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:46 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> 
> That fits with my experience.  Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l you 
> tend to upset it.  Closing all, as you say, usually does it.  One variatioon 
> on your experience is that it may open and immediately close before you could 
> possibly remove the disk.  It then automatically mounts the disk again, and 
> you are back at square one until you've found what's bugging it.   I just 
> make sure everything's closed, now.
> 

Now this is not that unusual. I raised a boy who is now 19 of age. I
remember at 12/13 he showed the same priciple of behaviour as you
described above! ;-)

Women are like that sometimes, not dependent of their age. SCNR!

wobo 
-- 
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 2:04 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>>.  One
> > variatioon on your experience is that it may open and immediately close
> > before you could possibly remove the disk.  It then automatically mounts
> > the disk again, and you are back at square one until you've found what's
> > bugging it.   I just make sure everything's closed, now.
>
> Now this is not that unusual. I raised a boy who is now 19 of age. I
> remember at 12/13 he showed the same priciple of behaviour as you
> described above! ;-)
>
> Women are like that sometimes, not dependent of their age. SCNR!

:-P

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread et

 SCNR???



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread et
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 09:04 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:46 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > That fits with my experience.  Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l
> > you tend to upset it.  Closing all, as you say, usually does it.  One
> > variatioon on your experience is that it may open and immediately close
> > before you could possibly remove the disk.  It then automatically mounts
> > the disk again, and you are back at square one until you've found what's
> > bugging it.   I just make sure everything's closed, now.
>
> Now this is not that unusual. I raised a boy who is now 19 of age. I
> remember at 12/13 he showed the same priciple of behaviour as you
> described above! ;-)
>
> Women are like that sometimes, not dependent of their age. SCNR!
>
> wobo
don't blame it on the age,,, blame the parents. or the fact he is raised 
in a palce where hookers walk the Strauss, or that he is a German.. ya thats 
the ticket,,, blame his nationality...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread SainTiss
I just tried playing an audio-cd, and that works fine as well...

Hans

On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:28, SainTiss wrote:
> Hmm, wait a minute...
> 
> I think I figured it out: 
> 
> I seem to be able to mount /mnt/cdrom2 without a cd being in the
> drive... And from the moment that's done, it all seems to work... if I
> insert a cd, its contents are correctly displayed, I can eject it
> without unmounting, and I can replace the cd and it will detect that and
> get its contents right again...
> 
> so that would mean I should just remove the "noauto" from fstab, and I
> should be fine?
> 
> Is that how it works?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Hans
> 
> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:17, SainTiss wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > 
> > > > I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work either...
> > > >
> > > Shot in the dark, Hans.  I know some parts of this statement are 
> > > position-sensitive, but I don't know which ones.  Try moving the 'user' 
> > > forward.
> > 
> > Didn't help either, but thanks for the tip...
> > 
> > this is what I did to get it working:
> > 
> > 1) upgrade kernel and reboot
> > 2) enable supermount in MDK CC
> > 3) check that supermount is loaded with lsmod
> > 4) put a cd in the cd-player
> > 5) wait and see nothing happen
> > 6) cd /mnt/cdrom2 and nothing happens...
> > 
> > Hans
-- 
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?

Hans Schippers
1LIC INF
UIA 2002-2003



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:23 -0500, et wrote:
> 
>  SCNR???

Sorry Could Not Resist 
(if you were asking for the meaning)

A kind of preventive measure when you know you may get spanked for
what you did or wrote. Most important lifesaving sentence in marital
life.

wobo
-- 
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread et
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 09:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:23 -0500, et wrote:
> >  SCNR???
>
> Sorry Could Not Resist
> (if you were asking for the meaning)
>
> A kind of preventive measure when you know you may get spanked for
> what you did or wrote. Most important lifesaving sentence in marital
> life.
>
> wobo
thank you,,, that was what I was asking.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 2:27 pm, SainTiss wrote:
> I just tried playing an audio-cd, and that works fine as well...
>
Sounds as though you're sorted, then.  But - you told us how, now we need to 
know why :)  Anyone tell us?

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Damian Gatabria

Sorry for coming in late.


> I seem to be able to mount /mnt/cdrom2 without a cd being in the
> drive... 

Yes. once you have enabled supermount in the fstab, you have to call
"mount /mnt/cdrom2" to actually activate it.

>And from the moment that's done, it all seems to work... if I
> insert a cd, its contents are correctly displayed, I can eject it
> without unmounting, and I can replace the cd and it will detect that and
> get its contents right again...

Good. so it's working.


> so that would mean I should just remove the "noauto" from fstab, and I
> should be fine?

"noauto" is a parameter that means that this drive is NOT included in the list
when you tell the fstab to mount everything. for example, when you issue an
"mount -a" (this means 'mount every drive listed in the fstab) drives with
the "noauto" flag are skipped, and thus, say unmounted..


> Is that how it works?

seems so.

> Thanks
>
> Hans

Damian


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Damian Gatabria
>
> That fits with my experience.  Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l
> you tend to upset it.  Closing all, as you say, usually does it.  One
> variatioon on your experience is that it may open and immediately close
> before you could possibly remove the disk.  It then automatically mounts
> the disk again, and you are back at square one until you've found what's
> bugging it.   I just make sure everything's closed, now.


This is a bug in konq, and apparently, it's being worked out for MDK9.1,
since i read a longish thread about it. 
The problem is quite simple: Konq likes to update the directories it's
showing. for example, use konqueror to navigate to a directory,
and then delete one file from a terminal. the directory view in konqueror
gets updated almost immediately.
When konqueror is showing the contents of a CD (or was showing is and
therefore it's in the 'history') and you remove the CD, konq tries to see
what changed, and this triggers the remount of the CD instantly.

Damian


-- 
--
I don't want Windows to be only for the 31173. Yes, we've come a long way from
all those security holes, virii, and cryptic commands like "Edit textfile.txt"
(what in the hell is that supposed to mean?)


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread SainTiss
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:33, Damian Gatabria wrote:

> 
> > so that would mean I should just remove the "noauto" from fstab, and I
> > should be fine?
> 
> "noauto" is a parameter that means that this drive is NOT included in the list
> when you tell the fstab to mount everything. for example, when you issue an
> "mount -a" (this means 'mount every drive listed in the fstab) drives with
> the "noauto" flag are skipped, and thus, say unmounted..
> 

Well yes... what I mean was that I should remove the noauto parameter so
that supermount will be enabled and working on the next reboot...

Otherwise, the supermount module will still be loaded, but it wouldn't
work again when I reboot, unless I'd manually mount it to activate, as
you said... So removing the noauto option would make sure the system
activates on reboot, which is the desired behaviour I guess...

Thanks to all replying people..

Hans

-- 
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?

Hans Schippers
1LIC INF
UIA 2002-2003



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread civileme
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 03:03 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> Yes.  Supermount is evil.  This is the first thing i disable after an
> install.
> Rob
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SainTiss
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 AM
> >> To: MDKexpert Mailing
> >> Subject: [expert] supermount
> >>
> >>
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled supermount, but when
> >> I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't mount automatically
> >> did I miss something here?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Hans
> >>
> >> --
> >> In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
> >>
> >> Hans Schippers
> >> 1LIC INF
> >> UIA 2002-2003
Well if you installed without supermount and put in a kernel with it installed 
and enabled, the /etc/fstab lines will not be set for supermount
 Here are some lines that work for one rig, and should be translatable to your 
situation...

none /mnt/cdrom supermount 
dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,umask=0 0 0
none /mnt/floppy supermount 
dev=/dev/fd0,fs=auto,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,sync,codepage=850,umask=0 0 0

Civileme




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:40 pm, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> > That fits with my experience.  Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l
> > you tend to upset it.  Closing all, as you say, usually does it.  One
> > variatioon on your experience is that it may open and immediately close
> > before you could possibly remove the disk.  It then automatically mounts
> > the disk again, and you are back at square one until you've found what's
> > bugging it.   I just make sure everything's closed, now.
>
> This is a bug in konq, and apparently, it's being worked out for MDK9.1,
> since i read a longish thread about it.
> The problem is quite simple: Konq likes to update the directories it's
> showing. for example, use konqueror to navigate to a directory,
> and then delete one file from a terminal. the directory view in konqueror
> gets updated almost immediately.
> When konqueror is showing the contents of a CD (or was showing is and
> therefore it's in the 'history') and you remove the CD, konq tries to see
> what changed, and this triggers the remount of the CD instantly.
>
That makes sense.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Alan Shoemaker
SainTiss wrote:
> hi,
>
> I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled
> supermount, but when I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't
> mount automatically did I miss something here?
>
> Thanks
>
> Hans

you need to reboot the computer after doing a 'supermount -i 
enable' to get supermount to read the fstab file.
-- 
Alan


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 12:32 pm, Alan Shoemaker wrote:

> you need to reboot the computer after doing a 'supermount -i
> enable' to get supermount to read the fstab file.

 I think you can do a "mount -a" and get away with the same thing 
without rebooting...

-- 

 /\ 
 Dark< >Lord
 \/ 
 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 07:39 am, Anne Wilson wrote:

> There must be some oddity about supermount, though.  It works beautifully
> on my box, yet others have endless problems.  Of course, it may be that
> other customisation/choices are affecting it - don't know about that.
>
> Anne

Ditto here, Anne - it works great on my 9 year olds Shuttle MB system and does 
odd things on my Soyo Dragon Plus...

-- 

 /\ 
 Dark< >Lord
 \/ 
 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 February 2003 12:32 pm, Alan Shoemaker 
wrote:
> > you need to reboot the computer after doing a 'supermount
> > -i enable' to get supermount to read the fstab file.
>
>  I think you can do a "mount -a" and get away with
> the same thing without rebooting...

maybe, but i think there may be something beyond just that 
done in the initscripts.  anyway i never saw in this thread 
anyone mentioning doing either one. :)
-- 
Alan


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Todd Lyons
SainTiss wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:58:18PM +0100 :
> hi,
> 
> I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled supermount, but when
> I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't mount automatically
> did I miss something here?

Paste your /etc/fstab.  Paste the results of 'mount'.  Paste the results
of 'lsmod'.

Blue skies...   Todd
-- 
  Todd Lyons -- MandrakeSoft, Inc.   http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because 
  that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn
  Mandrake Cooker Devel Version, Kernel 2.4.21pre4-1mdk



msg65645/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Anne Wilson wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:46:54PM + :
> >
> > I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but to
> > no avail...
> I couldn't figure that one out either.

The options that come before the -- are for supermount itself.  The
options that come after the -- are for the target filesystem that
supermount will eventually be using.  Think of supermount as just a
front end for the real filesystem module that will actually be reading
the media.

Blue skies...   Todd
- -- 
   MandrakeSoft USA   http://www.mandrakesoft.com
   Easy things should be easy, and hard things should be possible.
--Larry Wall
  Mandrake Cooker Devel Version, Kernel 2.4.21pre4-1mdk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+QZDblp7v05cW2woRAoBtAJ9K4I4uAOiiKGOhP9PZ52FPAnLCKwCguWgp
fwAW8J4+iHlmMDb+NUojt1M=
=05oK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Anne Wilson wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:39:49PM + :
> > Well, I reasoned that way too when I first installed 9.0, but the docs
> > of the kernel-updates specifically mention supermount as being rewritten
> > and fixed...
> There must be some oddity about supermount, though.  It works beautifully on 
> my box, yet others have endless problems.  Of course, it may be that other 
> customisation/choices are affecting it - don't know about that.

Yes, the update kernel is a fix for all of those that were having
problems.  It doesn't fix every problem known under the sun, but for 98%
of the uses, it works properly.

Blue skies...   Todd
- -- 
| MandrakeSoft USA | Sometimes you get what you want. |
| http://www.mandrakesoft.com  | Sometimes you get experience.|
| http://www.mandrakelinux.com |--unknown origin  |
  Mandrake Cooker Devel Version, Kernel 2.4.21pre4-1mdk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+QZFClp7v05cW2woRAnW5AJ42bV68JfLWRmEmFGgsHKUegEmTAwCfaooS
Xghhqu7xOkA5+s6EzZOj+E8=
=F7Cu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 10:31 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Anne Wilson wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:46:54PM + :
> > > I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but to
> > > no avail...
> >
> > I couldn't figure that one out either.
>
> The options that come before the -- are for supermount itself.  The
> options that come after the -- are for the target filesystem that
> supermount will eventually be using.  Think of supermount as just a
> front end for the real filesystem module that will actually be reading
> the media.
>
Thank you Todd. Noted.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Lorne
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 06:17 am, SainTiss wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work either...
> >
> > Shot in the dark, Hans.  I know some parts of this statement are
> > position-sensitive, but I don't know which ones.  Try moving the 'user'
> > forward.
>
> Didn't help either, but thanks for the tip...
>
> this is what I did to get it working:
>
> 1) upgrade kernel and reboot
> 2) enable supermount in MDK CC
> 3) check that supermount is loaded with lsmod
> 4) put a cd in the cd-player
> 5) wait and see nothing happen
> 6) cd /mnt/cdrom2 and nothing happens...
>
Ummm I know this is a terribly stupid question but did you do an ls 
/mnt/cdrom2? The supermount stuff is black magic and I don't think I like it 
at all, but for me I have to try access it before anything happens. ??

> Hans



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 20:50, Lorne wrote:

> > 5) wait and see nothing happen
> > 6) cd /mnt/cdrom2 and nothing happens...
> >
> Ummm I know this is a terribly stupid question but did you do an ls 
> /mnt/cdrom2? The supermount stuff is black magic and I don't think I like it 
> at all, but for me I have to try access it before anything happens. ??
> 
> > Hans

With supermount a "cd" should cause drive activity.  If I was testing
however, I too would have done an ls on the drive to check and make
sure.

LX

-- 
°°°
Kernel  2.4.18-6mdk Mandrake Linux  8.2
Enlightenment 0.16.5-11mdkEvolution  1.0.2-5mdk
Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/
°°°



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] supermount problem?

2002-07-29 Thread Darren King

I am running 8.2 with the cooker kernel.  With the old kernel, I had no
problems accessing cd's but now I get "Stale NFS file handle" when I try
to ls under the cdrom directory.

Is this a known bug?  Is there a known fix?

Darren






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount

2003-10-06 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 06 Oct 2003 9:16 am, Richard Bown wrote:
> Hi All
> I suspect this has been round before.I had'nt noticed it as I
> rarely use a floppy these days.
> But that friend noticed it ,( I suspect I have misspelt friend, in
> his case maybe the "r" is missing).
>
> I've checked my machines and they all do the same.
> Which ever app uses the floppy drive first time dos'nt release it,
> so the next time its used with a different app you get the error
> message that the device is busy.
>
> eg. when starting with nautilus then win4lin or mtools
>
> Whats the preferred option in fstab for the floppy ?
>
> WM = gnome
>
Hi, Richard.  Mine is 
none /mnt/floppy supermount 
dev=/dev/fd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,sync,codepage=850 0 
0
and supermount works fine for me.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] supermount

2003-10-06 Thread Richard Bown
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 10:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 06 Oct 2003 9:16 am, Richard Bown wrote:
> > Hi All
> > I suspect this has been round before.I had'nt noticed it as I
> > rarely use a floppy these days.
> > But that friend noticed it ,( I suspect I have misspelt friend, in
> > his case maybe the "r" is missing).
> >
> > I've checked my machines and they all do the same.
> > Which ever app uses the floppy drive first time dos'nt release it,
> > so the next time its used with a different app you get the error
> > message that the device is busy.
> >
> > eg. when starting with nautilus then win4lin or mtools
> >
> > Whats the preferred option in fstab for the floppy ?
> >
> > WM = gnome
> >
> Hi, Richard.  Mine is 
> none /mnt/floppy supermount 
> dev=/dev/fd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,sync,codepage=850 0 
> 0

Hi Anne

here's mine and the user bit is missing ummm !

Quick edit and give it a try

none /mnt/floppy supermount
dev=/dev/fd0,fs=auto,--,iocharset=iso8859-15,sync,co
depage=850 0 0

Richard

-- 
Richard Bown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] supermount

2003-10-06 Thread Richard Bown

Hi 
Replying to Anne

I had user missing from that line , so I added it and rebooted.
Exactly the same happens, even tried killing nautilus.

So I changed the fstab entry to ext3

mtools works so does win4lin :)

If I manually mount the floppy drive Nautilus can see the contents but
mtools and win4 lin cant until I unmount it.
So next read the Nautilus help file,
so  right mouse click on the desktop and select  disks> floppy
and nautilus cant mount it.

So it seems that nautilus dos'nt release the mount for other apps to use
when supermount is used for the floppy.
ps ax shows that for each floppy or cdrom icon on the desktop nautilus
has an active process.

Any more thought s please

Richard

On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 10:18, Richard Bown wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 10:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Monday 06 Oct 2003 9:16 am, Richard Bown wrote:
> > > Hi All
> > > I suspect this has been round before.I had'nt noticed it as I
> > > rarely use a floppy these days.
> > > But that friend noticed it ,( I suspect I have misspelt friend, in
> > > his case maybe the "r" is missing).
> > >
> > > I've checked my machines and they all do the same.
> > > Which ever app uses the floppy drive first time dos'nt release it,
> > > so the next time its used with a different app you get the error
> > > message that the device is busy.
> > >
> > > eg. when starting with nautilus then win4lin or mtools
> > >
> > > Whats the preferred option in fstab for the floppy ?
> > >
> > > WM = gnome
> > >
> > Hi, Richard.  Mine is 
> > none /mnt/floppy supermount 
> > dev=/dev/fd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,sync,codepage=850 0 
> > 0
> 
> Hi Anne
> 
> here's mine and the user bit is missing ummm !
> 
> Quick edit and give it a try
> 
> none /mnt/floppy supermount
> dev=/dev/fd0,fs=auto,--,iocharset=iso8859-15,sync,co
> depage=850 0 0
> 
> Richard
-- 
Richard Bown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Supermount configuration

2000-06-19 Thread Guillaume Rousse

Seems i've lost supermount capacity in some manner, and i can't retrieve it.
I've the last kernel 2.2.16-4, with supermount as a module, and a
correct fstab, but no way. I can load the module manually, using lsmod, so it's
not a conf.modules problem either. So, what is wrong ?

 -- 
Guillaume Rousse
Iremia - Université de la Réunion

Sleep doesn't exists. Just lack of cafeine.




Re: [expert] Supermount

2000-12-05 Thread Dennis Robertson

On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 11:19:12PM +0100, Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno] 
wrote:

> Downloaded 2.4.0-test11 and the supermount patch, compiled and installed 
> everything, just one problem.
> 
> So, how do I "enable" supermount after having modifed my file system?

supermount needs to be run as a module AFAIK.  check you have selected "m" in the 
kernel compile. HTH.

-- 
Dennis Robertson  2/2 Sylvia Street  NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566
Phone: 61 7 54742343  Mob: 0419 535539
He's just like Capistrano, always ready for a few swallows.



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Supermount

2000-12-05 Thread skidley

On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno] wrote:

> After trying to get supermount up and running for two days I've gotten this
> far:
>
> - compiled and installed 2.4.0-test11 with the supermount patch
> - modified /etc/fstab with 'supermount -i enable*
>
> After this I ran this command 'mount -t supermount -o fs=iso9660
> dev=/dev/scd0,--, /mnt/dvdrom/'  after this I try to enter the dvdrom
> directory, but get this error no matter what cd I put in: 'bash: cd: dvdrom/:
> Input/output error'
>
> Anybody that has any clue what I'm doing wrong?
>
>
>
I've had the same troubles when I compiled a test kernel and also
2.2.18pre, I even had filename dates of 1969 and stuff after booting these
kernels so I decided to just go back to Mandrakes stock kernel and forget
trying any test kernels. I just hope when the next stable comes out It
will work with mandrake. I get this feeling it doesn't like any other
kernel besides what came on the disc. But that might be just me.

 --
Chad Y.
Registered Linux User #195191




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Supermount

2000-12-05 Thread Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]

On Tuesday 05 December 2000 12:35, you wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 11:19:12PM +0100, Christian A Strømmen 
[Number1/NumeroUno] wrote:
> > Downloaded 2.4.0-test11 and the supermount patch, compiled and installed
> > everything, just one problem.
> >
> > So, how do I "enable" supermount after having modifed my file system?
>
> supermount needs to be run as a module AFAIK.  check you have selected "m"
> in the kernel compile. HTH.

It HAS to be a module?  I just built it in the kernel...  Can't find anywhere 
in the README that it HAS to be a module.. :)

-- 
\ Christian A Strømmen /
\ Number1/NumeroUno @ Undernet - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
\ Web: www.realityx.net - Cell: +47 911 43 948 /
   Live your life by your dreams,
 not by the limits of reality...



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Supermount

2000-12-05 Thread Anton Graham

Submitted 05-Dec-00 by Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]:

> It HAS to be a module?  I just built it in the kernel...  Can't find anywhere 
> in the README that it HAS to be a module.. :)

Supermount in and of itself doesn't need to be a module, however your
initscripts assume it will be and disable it at boot time if they can't find
the module.  (I sent in a patch before the 7.2 beta cycle but it wasn't
included).

-- 
Anton GrahamGPG ID: 0x18F78541
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RSA key available upon request
 
Kindness is the beginning of cruelty.  
  -- Muad'dib [Frank Herbert, "Dune"]




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Supermount

2000-12-05 Thread Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]

On Tuesday 05 December 2000 16:11, Anton Graham wrote:
> Submitted 05-Dec-00 by Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]:
> > It HAS to be a module?  I just built it in the kernel...  Can't find
> > anywhere in the README that it HAS to be a module.. :)
>
> Supermount in and of itself doesn't need to be a module, however your
> initscripts assume it will be and disable it at boot time if they can't
> find the module.  (I sent in a patch before the 7.2 beta cycle but it
> wasn't included).

So, how do I re-enable it?

-- 
\ Christian A Strømmen /
\ Number1/NumeroUno @ Undernet - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
\ Web: www.realityx.net - Cell: +47 911 43 948 /
   Live your life by your dreams,
 not by the limits of reality...



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Supermount

2000-12-06 Thread Anton Graham

Submitted 06-Dec-00 by Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]:
>> Supermount in and of itself doesn't need to be a module, however your
>> initscripts assume it will be and disable it at boot time if they can't
>> find the module.  (I sent in a patch before the 7.2 beta cycle but it
>> wasn't included).

> So, how do I re-enable it?

First, comment out the portion of /etc/rc.d/init.d/mandrake_everytime that
disables it.  Then /usr/sbin/supermount --enable.  After that, check your
fstab to ensure that it is correct.  Finally, mount -o remount -a.

That should fix you right up.

-- 
Anton GrahamGPG ID: 0x18F78541
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RSA key available upon request
 
An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears
this is true.




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] supermount & floppies

2000-12-06 Thread Florian Kleedorfer

Hi all!

I am using the mandrake kernel 2.2.17 with supermount 
activated (I have tried compiling it into the kernel and 
as a module) 

I have the following problem: 
*) if I cd to a (super)mounted directory on a floppy(e.g.
/mnt/floppy/XYZ/ where /mnt/floppy is the mount point for
   the floppy)
   and I remove the floppy from the drive, doing an ls leads to an
   i/o error. Nothing wrong with that. BUT: supermount is unable to
   mount floppies after this procedure until I reboot my machine.
*) before the said procedure, producing i/o error messages takes about
   2 seconds. After the procedure it takes about 20 seconds (Maybe this
   is significant to you...)

Does anybody have an idea as to how to solve this problem?
Does anybody happily use floppies with supermount without problems?

Although I haven't checked, I guess the said behaviour should be the
same for CDs...

Any hints are greatly appreciated.

Flo



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Supermount

2001-07-07 Thread Fedneg



Hoyt wrote:
On Saturday 07 July 2001 11:52 am, you methodically organized electrons to state:
  Hello:I've compiled new kernel 2.4.6 in my MD 8.0 frequently #2, and nowI've lost supermount with all kernels (included 2.4.5-mdk). I used"supermount -i enable"but I can't get it back.Any help?

Did you choose to enable it in the config file?
PS: Someone knows where can I get supermount patch for 2.4.6 kernel.
  
  http://www.geocities.com/alexismikhailov/supermount.htmlfound by searching for it at freshmeat.netHoyt
  
  
  
    My problem is that after instaling the kernel compided by myself (as
I downloaded it
from kernel.org, with no patch) I've lost supermount to work with precompiled
kernels also.
  
PS:  When I apply Supermount 0.5.3-2.4.0-diff to kernel-2.4.6 I get a lot
of errors, my be
this pacth only works with 2.4.0 kernel?
  
            Fedneg
  
  


Re: [expert] Supermount

2002-01-25 Thread Praedor Tempus

I have kernel-2.4.17 and have tried activating supermount.  I did "supermount 
-i enable" and then edited fstab to be "correct" - it has entries identical 
to yours.  I stick a floppy in and try to view it and...pop, only root can 
mount it.  What the f*ck?  How does one get supermount to work for users?  Do 
I have to add a "user" entry to the supermount line?

On Tuesday 22 January 2002 22:04, you wrote:
> I had supermount working flawlessly in 8.1, with kernel 2.4.11
>
> the lines in supermount should look something like this I believe, (dont'
> quote me on this)
>
> /mnt/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
> dev=/dev/hdc,fs=auto,ro,exec,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,nosuid,nodev,codepage=8
>5 0 0 0
> /mnt/floppy /mnt/floppy
> dev=/dev/fd0,fs=auto,ro,exec,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,nosuid,nodev,codepage=8
>5 0 0 0
>
> like I said, don't quote me on that, I think its what I had... (I still
> have fstab.supermount, where I saved my supermount fstab file, when I was
> forced to remove all kernels and install the default 8.1 kernel for another
> reason. (I clagged my install.)
>
> then you just have to unmount and remount them... and if you have done the
> supermount -i enable
> you should be off and running..
>
>
> let us know if it works...
>
>
>
> rgds
>
> Frank
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Praedor Tempus
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2002 6:59 AM
> To: Mandrake Expert
> Subject: [expert] Supermount
>
>
> The old question...does supermount  work in Mandrake 8.1?
>
> I just built and installed kernel-2.4.17-1.1mdk from cooker (the stock
> 2.4.8 kernel would not function with my laptop) and enabled supermount
> support.  I have tried to activate/use supermount since but it just wont
> work.
>
> I have /dev/hdc which is my cdrom with mountpoint /mnt/cdrom.  I want
> supermount to function on this drive but nothing I've tried will do it.
>
> I ran "supermount enable" to see what output it would produce - I then
> added this to my /etc/fstab for the cdrom.  It doesn't work.  All I get is
> "must be
> root to mount..." yadda, yadda.  I tried adding extras like user to the
> string of config text in the supermount line in my fstab to no avail.  How
> dost one make supermount work in this context?
>
> praedor
>
> _
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount

2002-01-25 Thread Praedor Tempus

Well, problems problems.  I ALWAYS compile my kernels with supermount support 
built into the kernel, not as a module, because for some items I get tired of 
problems with modules not working (like sound modules...I HAVE to build my 
driver into the kernel or sound will not work).  So, I built supermount 
support into my 2.4.17 kernel but after I added "user" to the supermount 
lines in my fstab and then tried to mount the floppy, I get "supermount fs 
type not supported by kernel".  GAH!  I DID build it INTO the frickin' 
kernel.  It HAS to support it unless the "code" for supermount in the 2.4.17 
kernel is a joke, just some null text.  

Anyone else have problems like this?

On Tuesday 22 January 2002 22:04, you wrote:
> I had supermount working flawlessly in 8.1, with kernel 2.4.11
>
> the lines in supermount should look something like this I believe, (dont'
> quote me on this)
>
> /mnt/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
> dev=/dev/hdc,fs=auto,ro,exec,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,nosuid,nodev,codepage=8
>5 0 0 0
> /mnt/floppy /mnt/floppy
> dev=/dev/fd0,fs=auto,ro,exec,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,nosuid,nodev,codepage=8
>5 0 0 0
>
> like I said, don't quote me on that, I think its what I had... (I still
> have fstab.supermount, where I saved my supermount fstab file, when I was
> forced to remove all kernels and install the default 8.1 kernel for another
> reason. (I clagged my install.)
>
> then you just have to unmount and remount them... and if you have done the
> supermount -i enable
> you should be off and running..
>
>
> let us know if it works...
>
>
>
> rgds
>
> Frank
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Praedor Tempus
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2002 6:59 AM
> To: Mandrake Expert
> Subject: [expert] Supermount
>
>
> The old question...does supermount  work in Mandrake 8.1?
>
> I just built and installed kernel-2.4.17-1.1mdk from cooker (the stock
> 2.4.8 kernel would not function with my laptop) and enabled supermount
> support.  I have tried to activate/use supermount since but it just wont
> work.
>
> I have /dev/hdc which is my cdrom with mountpoint /mnt/cdrom.  I want
> supermount to function on this drive but nothing I've tried will do it.
>
> I ran "supermount enable" to see what output it would produce - I then
> added this to my /etc/fstab for the cdrom.  It doesn't work.  All I get is
> "must be
> root to mount..." yadda, yadda.  I tried adding extras like user to the
> string of config text in the supermount line in my fstab to no avail.  How
> dost one make supermount work in this context?
>
> praedor
>
> _
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount

2002-01-26 Thread Joan Tur

Es Dissabte 26 Gener 2002 00:41, en Praedor Tempus va escriure:
> I have kernel-2.4.17 and have tried activating supermount.  I did
> "supermount -i enable" and then edited fstab to be "correct" - it has
> entries identical to yours.  I stick a floppy in and try to view it
> and...pop, only root can mount it.
I did the same: i installed 2.4.17-8, ran "supermount -i enable" and it works 
fine for me.  Here you have my /etc/fstab

[quini@quinipc video_ts]$ cat /etc/fstab
/dev/sdb6 / reiserfs notail 1 1
none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
/dev/sda1 /home reiserfs defaults 1 2
/dev/hda8 /mnt/bkp reiserfs notail 1 2
none/mnt/cdrom  supermount  
fs=auto,dev=/dev/scd1,--,ro,nosuid,iocharset=iso8859-15,nodev,codepage=850,exec 
0 0
none/mnt/cdrom2 supermount  
fs=auto,dev=/dev/scd0,--,ro,nosuid,iocharset=iso8859-15,nodev,codepage=850,exec 
0 0
none/mnt/floppy supermount  
fs=auto,dev=/dev/fd0,--,nosuid,iocharset=iso8859-15,nodev,codepage=850,exec 0 
0
/dev/hda7 /mnt/proves_linux reiserfs notail 1 2
/dev/hda1 /mnt/win vfat 
user,exec,rw,dev,suid,umask=0,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850 0 0
/dev/hda5 /mnt/win2 vfat 
user,exec,rw,dev,suid,umask=0,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850 0 0
none /proc proc defaults 0 0
/dev/sdb5 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/hda6 swap swap defaults 0 0

-- 
Joan Tur. Ibiza - Spain
Yahoo & AOL quini2k  ICQ 11407395
   www.ClubIbosim.org
 Linux: usuari registrat 190.783



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount

2002-01-26 Thread Praedor Tempus

Damnit.  My entries are essentially the same, as would
be expected having run "supermount -i enable" myself. 
What I get whenever I try to view/mount one of these
mounts is a message that only root can mount those
filesystems.  


--- Joan Tur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Es Dissabte 26 Gener 2002 00:41, en Praedor Tempus
> va escriure:
> > I have kernel-2.4.17 and have tried activating
> supermount.  I did
> > "supermount -i enable" and then edited fstab to be
> "correct" - it has
> > entries identical to yours.  I stick a floppy in
> and try to view it
> > and...pop, only root can mount it.
> I did the same: i installed 2.4.17-8, ran
> "supermount -i enable" and it works 
> fine for me.  Here you have my /etc/fstab
> 
> [quini@quinipc video_ts]$ cat /etc/fstab
> /dev/sdb6 / reiserfs notail 1 1
> none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620 0 0
> none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
> /dev/sda1 /home reiserfs defaults 1 2
> /dev/hda8 /mnt/bkp reiserfs notail 1 2
> none/mnt/cdrom  supermount  
>
fs=auto,dev=/dev/scd1,--,ro,nosuid,iocharset=iso8859-15,nodev,codepage=850,exec
> 
> 0 0
> none/mnt/cdrom2 supermount  
>
fs=auto,dev=/dev/scd0,--,ro,nosuid,iocharset=iso8859-15,nodev,codepage=850,exec
> 
> 0 0
> none/mnt/floppy supermount  
>
fs=auto,dev=/dev/fd0,--,nosuid,iocharset=iso8859-15,nodev,codepage=850,exec
> 0 
> 0
> /dev/hda7 /mnt/proves_linux reiserfs notail 1 2
> /dev/hda1 /mnt/win vfat 
>
user,exec,rw,dev,suid,umask=0,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850
> 0 0
> /dev/hda5 /mnt/win2 vfat 
>
user,exec,rw,dev,suid,umask=0,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850
> 0 0
> none /proc proc defaults 0 0
> /dev/sdb5 swap swap defaults 0 0
> /dev/hda6 swap swap defaults 0 0
> 
> -- 
> Joan Tur. Ibiza - Spain
> Yahoo & AOL quini2k  ICQ 11407395
>www.ClubIbosim.org
>  Linux: usuari registrat 190.783
> 
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
> 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! 
http://auctions.yahoo.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount

2002-01-26 Thread Onur Kucuk


Saturday, January 26, 2002, 7:54:17 PM, you wrote:

PT> Damnit.  My entries are essentially the same, as would
PT> be expected having run "supermount -i enable" myself. 
PT> What I get whenever I try to view/mount one of these
PT> mounts is a message that only root can mount those
PT> filesystems.  

add "user" to the options

 Onur Kucuk


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [expert] supermount unreliable

2002-10-22 Thread Jane Gray-Luhr
Yes we have seen this as well.
On Mandrake 8.2 as well. 
The manual mount clears the problem.

-Original Message-
From: Milos Prudek [mailto:milos.prudek@;tiscali.cz]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] supermount unreliable


Hi all,

is supermount working flawlesly for anyone?

It works for every media and drive, but only for a few accesses. After a 
few minutes directories cannot be listed.

When I disable supermount and mount everything manually, it works 
without a hitch.

Anyone else is experiencing this?

-- 
Milos Prudek




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount unreliable

2002-10-22 Thread Milos Prudek
Yes we have seen this as well.
On Mandrake 8.2 as well. 
The manual mount clears the problem.

Absolutely.

Is there no way to make supermount work?

--
Milos Prudek



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount unreliable

2002-10-22 Thread Praedor Tempus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 22 October 2002 11:53 am, Milos Prudek wrote:
> > Yes we have seen this as well.
> > On Mandrake 8.2 as well.
> > The manual mount clears the problem.
>
> Absolutely.
>
> Is there no way to make supermount work?

Since it works fine for me on 8.2 with a 2.4.19 kernel that I built myself, 
you could try that route on 9.0.

Giving up supermount is not an option if you happen to play games, native or 
via wine, and they require CD changes.  Supermount allows you to change CDs 
on the fly without wrecking the session while old manual mount/umount screws 
it up.

Hopefully, a subsequent kernel update will fix supermount (again).

praedor
- -- 
Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry 
into a patriotic fervor...the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded with 
patriotism, will offer up all their rights unto the leader and gladly so.
  --unknown 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9tY4N1i/6R1B/Yh0RAm5XAKCQQVLglaAcAGqa88n0ARV7BFnCwgCbBoPm
4wknyCNL0fIQFsRX2OD2iOQ=
=iuqW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount unreliable

2002-10-22 Thread Todd Lyons
Milos Prudek wrote on Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:53:37PM +0200 :
> >Yes we have seen this as well.
> >On Mandrake 8.2 as well. 
> >The manual mount clears the problem.
> Is there no way to make supermount work?

The code for supermount itself is fairly clean and straightforward.  But
how to make the kernel gracefully exit situations where it's trying to
access a file on media that is no longer available is what is the hard
part.  I don't profess to be a guru with kernel code by any means.  It's
a deep concept that has lots of issues that it has to deal with.

Blue skies...   Todd
-- 
   MandrakeSoft USA   http://www.mandrakesoft.com
   Easy things should be easy, and hard things should be possible.
--Larry Wall
   Cooker Version mandrake-release-9.1-0.1mdk Kernel 2.4.19-16mdk



msg59793/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: [expert] supermount unreliable

2002-10-22 Thread Franki
if it is that hard, how did losers like microsoft get it working in their
OS..???

I mean in 95 it had some issues with floppies constantly being seeked and
stuff, but they ironed it out for
later versions..

I guess we'll never know what klugge they used, the curse of open source...


rgds

Frank

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:todd@;mandrakesoft.com]On Behalf Of
Todd Lyons
Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 1:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] supermount unreliable


Milos Prudek wrote on Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:53:37PM +0200 :
> >Yes we have seen this as well.
> >On Mandrake 8.2 as well.
> >The manual mount clears the problem.
> Is there no way to make supermount work?

The code for supermount itself is fairly clean and straightforward.  But
how to make the kernel gracefully exit situations where it's trying to
access a file on media that is no longer available is what is the hard
part.  I don't profess to be a guru with kernel code by any means.  It's
a deep concept that has lots of issues that it has to deal with.

Blue skies...   Todd
--
   MandrakeSoft USA   http://www.mandrakesoft.com
   Easy things should be easy, and hard things should be possible.
--Larry Wall
   Cooker Version mandrake-release-9.1-0.1mdk Kernel 2.4.19-16mdk



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [expert] supermount unreliable

2002-10-25 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 14:26, Franki wrote:
> if it is that hard, how did losers like microsoft get it working in their
> OS..???
> 
> I mean in 95 it had some issues with floppies constantly being seeked and
> stuff, but they ironed it out for
> later versions..

Not really.  It still happens in 98 and 98SE; i.e., bluescreens when
Explorer attempts to access media that "no longer exists." Not only does
this include floppies, but also CDRoms.

Most of the time when their software engineers approach a problem, they
take the stupid approach.  Within their organization, different groups
that are in charge of different aspects of the OS do not communicate
with each other except on a very basic level. The communication is not
nearly as comprehensive and open as it is in the GNU world.  In fact
they are encouraged to compete with each other.

I encourage you to read "Barbarians Led by Bill Gates", if you are
interested.  ISBN 0-8050-5754-4.

> 
> I guess we'll never know what klugge they used, the curse of open source...
> 
> 
> rgds
> 
> Frank
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:todd@;mandrakesoft.com]On Behalf Of
> Todd Lyons
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 1:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] supermount unreliable
> 
> 
> Milos Prudek wrote on Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:53:37PM +0200 :
> > >Yes we have seen this as well.
> > >On Mandrake 8.2 as well.
> > >The manual mount clears the problem.
> > Is there no way to make supermount work?
> 
> The code for supermount itself is fairly clean and straightforward.  But
> how to make the kernel gracefully exit situations where it's trying to
> access a file on media that is no longer available is what is the hard
> part.  I don't profess to be a guru with kernel code by any means.  It's
> a deep concept that has lots of issues that it has to deal with.
> 
> Blue skies... Todd
> --

Best Regards,

LX

-- 
°°°
Kernel  2.4.18-6mdk Mandrake Linux  8.2
Enlightenment 0.16.5-11mdkEvolution  1.0.2-5mdk
Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/
°°°



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount unreliable

2002-10-29 Thread Praedor Tempus
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 11:53 am, Milos Prudek wrote:
> > Yes we have seen this as well.
> > On Mandrake 8.2 as well.
> > The manual mount clears the problem.
>
> Absolutely.
>
> Is there no way to make supermount work?

Just another note on supermount. I am using 8.2 with a self-built kernel 
2.4.19-9mdk.  Supermount works fine on this system.  Perhaps the 2.4.19 
kernel in 9.0 is re-broken for supermount.  It is generally not the fault of 
the distro when supermount goes south, but the kernel developers. 

The supermount problem is a recurring problem that shows up periodically with 
new kernels.  You could get the 2.4.19-9mdk and either build it or install a 
binary.  

-- 
Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry 
into a patriotic fervor...the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded with 
patriotism, will offer up all their rights unto the leader and gladly so.
  --unknown 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount unreliable

2002-10-29 Thread Todd Lyons
Praedor Tempus wrote on Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:05:55AM -0500 :
> >
> > Is there no way to make supermount work?
> Just another note on supermount. I am using 8.2 with a self-built kernel 
> 2.4.19-9mdk.  Supermount works fine on this system.  Perhaps the 2.4.19 
> kernel in 9.0 is re-broken for supermount.  It is generally not the fault of 
> the distro when supermount goes south, but the kernel developers. 

Supermount is not a part of the Linus released kernel.  Mandrake is the
only distro that adds the supermount patch to the kernel.

And I agree that somewhere around -14mdk or -15mdk, supermount received
some changes that resulted in more drives having problems.  A good case
in point is the fact that you have -9mdk and it's working well for you.

Blue skies...   Todd
-- 
| MandrakeSoft USA | Sometimes you get what you want. |
| http://www.mandrakesoft.com  | Sometimes you get experience.|
| http://www.mandrakelinux.com |--unknown origin  |
   Cooker Version mandrake-release-9.1-0.1mdk Kernel 2.4.19-16mdk



msg60282/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: RE: [expert] supermount

2003-02-05 Thread Joe Braddock
I haven't installed the kernel-updates, but I'm assuming that you turned supermount 
off with the original kernel.  If that's correct, have you turned it back on 
(supermount enable or whatever the actual command is).  Just updating the kernel won't 
automatically turn it back on for you. 

Joeb

p.s. if you have tried enabling it, then forgive this question!

---Original Message---
From: SainTiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 02/05/03 06:37 AM
To: MDKexpert Mailing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [expert] supermount

> 
> Well, I reasoned that way too when I first installed 9.0, but the docs
of the kernel-updates specifically mention supermount as being rewritten
and fixed...

Hans

On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 13:03, Robert Wideman wrote:
> Yes.  Supermount is evil.  This is the first thing i disable after an
> install.
> Rob
> 
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SainTiss
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 AM
> >> To: MDKexpert Mailing
> >> Subject: [expert] supermount
> >>
> >>
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled supermount, but
when
> >> I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't mount automatically
> >> did I miss something here?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Hans
> >>
> >> --
> >> In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
> >>
> >> Hans Schippers
> >> 1LIC INF
> >> UIA 2002-2003
> >>
> 
> 
> 
> __
> 
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?

Hans Schippers
1LIC INF
UIA 2002-2003
> 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Supermount on upgrade

2002-04-14 Thread Theo Brinkman

I just upgraded my system from 8.0 to 8.2, and I'm having trouble 
finding supermount.  Could somebody let me know what the package name 
is, and what CD it's on?

Thanks,
- Theo




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] supermount problem?

2002-07-30 Thread Tom Brinkman

On Monday July 29 2002 07:11 pm, Darren King wrote:
> I am running 8.2 with the cooker kernel.  With the old kernel, I had
> no problems accessing cd's but now I get "Stale NFS file handle" when
> I try to ls under the cdrom directory.
>
> Is this a known bug?  Is there a known fix?
>
> Darren

   It's a known problem.  It's still the behavior in current cooker and 
9.0 beta. If you search the cooker ML archive, I believe some hacks to 
fix it were disscussed.  OTOH, 'ls /mnt/cdrom' should work.
-- 
Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] Supermount stopped working?

2002-09-27 Thread Aleksey Naumov

Dear experts,

Recently I am having a problem ejecting a Zip disk. I use supermounting and 
the mounting part works ok: I can see files on the zip after I plug it in. 
However, it doesn't want to eject: the eject button is ignored until I log 
out of KDE, only then I get my disk back. It seems the unmounting part is not 
working?

I use MDK 8.2 and KDE 3.0.3. Any ideas will be appreciated!

Thanks,
Aleksey




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount configuration

2000-06-19 Thread Larry Sword

Guillaume Rousse wrote:

> Seems i've lost supermount capacity in some manner, and i can't retrieve it.
> I've the last kernel 2.2.16-4, with supermount as a module, and a
> correct fstab, but no way. I can load the module manually, using lsmod, so it's
> not a conf.modules problem either. So, what is wrong ?

Had a similar problem when I installed kernel-2.2.16-4

Since my cdrw is an ide I also use ide-scsi module. I had to add the  lines in my
config.modules file:
First line at top. alias scsi_hostadapter ide-scsi
and at the bottom line.  post-install supermount modprobe scsi_hostadapter

After changing the lines in my fstab and setting the links correctly things
returned back to normal.







Re: [expert] Supermount configuration

2000-06-20 Thread Guillaume Rousse

Also sprach mar, 20 jun 2000 :
> Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> 
> > Seems i've lost supermount capacity in some manner, and i can't retrieve it.
> > I've the last kernel 2.2.16-4, with supermount as a module, and a
> > correct fstab, but no way. I can load the module manually, using lsmod, so it's
> > not a conf.modules problem either. So, what is wrong ?
> 
> Had a similar problem when I installed kernel-2.2.16-4
> 
> Since my cdrw is an ide I also use ide-scsi module. I had to add the  lines in my
> config.modules file:
> First line at top. alias scsi_hostadapter ide-scsi
> and at the bottom line.  post-install supermount modprobe scsi_hostadapter
> 
> After changing the lines in my fstab and setting the links correctly things
> returned back to normal.
So i'll had to use ide-scsi module just for getting back supermount ? I'll
rather try to build supermount in the kernel rather than as a module.

-- 
Guillaume Rousse
Iremia - Université de la Réunion

Sleep doesn't exists. Just lack of cafeine.




[expert] Supermount not supermounting?

2001-07-01 Thread Andrew George

Hi,
I've got a problem after Freqing my 8.0 install
If I've got a CDROM in the drive at boot, it mounts OK,
But if I try to change the CD I get the following shoing in my logs

Jul  2 00:01:58 darkwing kernel: cdrom: open failed. 
Jul  2 00:01:58 darkwing kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 02:00 (floppy), 
sector 0

An earlier message that may be relevant is

Jul  2 00:01:00 darkwing kernel: VFS: busy inodes on changed media.

Meanwhile KFM shows the ever-popular locked folder.
I checked the symlink, and device permissions, and fstab/mtab...can't see a 
problem

Any thoughts anyone?

Andrew




[expert] Supermount & 2.4.8-18mdk

2001-09-06 Thread Bill Thompson

Supermount and this kernel works fine with my cdrom drive, zip drive
and floppy disk drive. Actually, my CD drive is a dvdrom drive. How
do I set up fstab to detect both a dvd or cdrom?

Bill
-- 
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati"
(When all else fails, play dead!)



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] supermount/hdc problem

2000-08-03 Thread Ben Sugerman

Whenever I shut down, I get this annoying error message about "hdc" and
the other day when I tried to eject my pcmcia cards, I received the
following message in /var/log/messages.  Anyone have any idea what might
be going on?  I'm running mdk 2.2.16-9 on a Gateway 9100 laptop.

-ben

Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 cardmgr[385]: executing: './serial check
ttyS1'
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel: hdc: packet command error: status=0x51
{ DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel: hdc: packet command error: error=0x50
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel: ATAPI device hdc:
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel:   Error: Illegal request -- (Sense
key=0x05)
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel:   Invalid field in command packet --
(asc=0x24, ascq=0x00)
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel:   The failed "Start/Stop Unit" packet
command was:
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel:   "1b 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
"
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel:   Error in command packet byte 4 bit 0

Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel: cdrom: open failed.
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 insmod: Note: /etc/conf.modules is more recent
than /lib/modules/2.2.16-9mdk/modules.dep
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 02:00
(floppy), sector 0
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 cardmgr[385]: shutting down socket 0
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 cardmgr[385]: executing: './serial stop ttyS1'

Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel: hdc: packet command error: status=0x51
{ DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel: hdc: packet command error: error=0x50
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel: ATAPI device hdc:
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel:   Error: Illegal request -- (Sense
key=0x05)
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel:   Invalid field in command packet --
(asc=0x24, ascq=0x00)
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel:   The failed "Start/Stop Unit" packet
command was:
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel:   "1b 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
"
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel:   Error in command packet byte 4 bit 0

Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel: cdrom: open failed.
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 02:00
(floppy), sector 0
Aug  3 11:37:06 astrolap1 kernel: tty01 unloaded





Re: [expert] Supermount on upgrade

2002-04-14 Thread Brian Parish

Theo,

There are no packages - it's part of the kernel.  It's just a matter of
whether it's switched on or not.  Your lilo settings handle this.  Look
at /etc/lilo.conf

If your linux boot stanza includes "devfs=mount" then it's on.  If it's
"devfs=nomount" then it's off.  Switch it on or off as you like by
editing lilo.conf as root then running lilo.

You can also use the supermount command as root to update /etc/fstab
appropriately, or to just try things out without updating.  Type "man
supermount" to learn about this.

HTH
Brian

On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:52, Theo Brinkman wrote:
> I just upgraded my system from 8.0 to 8.2, and I'm having trouble 
> finding supermount.  Could somebody let me know what the package name 
> is, and what CD it's on?
> 
> Thanks,
> - Theo
> 
> 
> 
> 

> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[expert] supermount and usb-storage

2002-06-20 Thread Doug McClendon

I just had an interesting experience with supermount and usb-storage. 
 Perhaps someone can give me some help.

I have a MS-Natural-Pro keyboard with integrated usb hub.  I also have a 
"universal smart drive" keychain 32M flash usb "drive".  I decided to 
try to use it with supermount.  For the most part, it works.

/mnt/keychain /mnt/keychain supermount 
dev=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1,fs=vfat,--,umask=0,sync 0 0

But when it was unplugged, and I did a "df -m", the df process became 
hung and unkill-KILLable.  My little wmmon load meter started gradually 
going higher and higher, until it was at a load of about 10 (10 bars). 
 Eventually, when I tried to plug the keychain back in, the df got 
killed, and could execute just fine, and the load returned to normal.

Is supermount just not designed to work with usb-storage?  Is there a 
bug that needs fixing, or a kernel I could upgrade to to fix this?

Thanks for any help...

-dmc





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount stopped working?

2002-09-27 Thread Todd Lyons

Aleksey Naumov wrote on Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 05:52:37PM -0400 :
> Dear experts,
> 
> Recently I am having a problem ejecting a Zip disk. I use supermounting and 
> the mounting part works ok: I can see files on the zip after I plug it in. 
> However, it doesn't want to eject: the eject button is ignored until I log 
> out of KDE, only then I get my disk back. It seems the unmounting part is not 
> working?

This is a KDE issue.  There's nothing you can do about it because that's
the way KDE is designed.  :(  The only answer as you've discovered is to
exit KDE.  There may be others, but I'm unaware of them.  Myself, I
don't run KDE and don't have problems with any of my peripherals.

Blue skies...   Todd
-- 
| MandrakeSoft USA | Security is like an onion.  It's made |
| http://www.mandrakesoft.com  | made up of several layers and makes   |
| http://www.mandrakelinux.com | you cry.  --Howard Chu|
   Cooker Version mandrake-release-9.0-0.3mdk Kernel 2.4.19-16mdk



msg58130/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] Supermount stopped working?

2002-09-27 Thread Aleksey Naumov

Todd,

I am afraid, my problem is more serious and is not KDE-specific. Just tried 
Gnome and get exactly the same bundle of problems as in KDE: zip is not 
mounted properly, what file browsers as well as 'ls -ll' show me is NOT 
what's on the disk! 
I plug in a disk, but the file tree I see on it actually belongs to another 
zip disk, and it doesn't change if I try other disks. Needless to say, I 
can't write to the disks (all of which work fine in Win98).

I recall now it started to go haywire after I installed a local printer with 
HardDrake. The printer also stopped working properly very soon after the 
installation (maybe when I accessed the zip...). So, the real problem must be 
some serious conflict b/w zip and printer. I'll start digging there...

Thanks,
Aleksey

On Friday 27 September 2002 18:10, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Aleksey Naumov wrote on Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 05:52:37PM -0400 :
> > Dear experts,
> >
> > Recently I am having a problem ejecting a Zip disk. I use supermounting
> > and the mounting part works ok: I can see files on the zip after I plug
> > it in. However, it doesn't want to eject: the eject button is ignored
> > until I log out of KDE, only then I get my disk back. It seems the
> > unmounting part is not working?
>
> This is a KDE issue.  There's nothing you can do about it because that's
> the way KDE is designed.  :(  The only answer as you've discovered is to
> exit KDE.  There may be others, but I'm unaware of them.  Myself, I
> don't run KDE and don't have problems with any of my peripherals.
>
> Blue skies... Todd




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount stopped working?

2002-09-27 Thread Todd Lyons

Aleksey Naumov wrote on Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 06:45:13PM -0400 :
> Todd,
> 
> I recall now it started to go haywire after I installed a local printer with 
> HardDrake. The printer also stopped working properly very soon after the 
> installation (maybe when I accessed the zip...). So, the real problem must be 
> some serious conflict b/w zip and printer. I'll start digging there...

I think that's a good idea.  Glad that you were able to correlate the
problem appearing to something that changed.  I know that there were
some USB issues involving 9.0 that was one of the contributing factors
to a delayed release, but those were all resolved to my knowledge.

Blue skies...   Todd
-- 
   MandrakeSoft USA   http://www.mandrakesoft.com
   Easy things should be easy, and hard things should be possible.
--Larry Wall
   Cooker Version mandrake-release-9.0-0.3mdk Kernel 2.4.19-16mdk



msg58139/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] Supermount stopped working?

2002-09-27 Thread Alan Shoemaker

Todd Lyons wrote:
> Aleksey Naumov wrote on Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 06:45:13PM 
-0400 :
> > Todd,
> >
> > I recall now it started to go haywire after I installed a
> > local printer with HardDrake. The printer also stopped
> > working properly very soon after the installation (maybe
> > when I accessed the zip...). So, the real problem must be
> > some serious conflict b/w zip and printer. I'll start
> > digging there...
>
> I think that's a good idea.  Glad that you were able to
> correlate the problem appearing to something that changed. 
> I know that there were some USB issues involving 9.0 that
> was one of the contributing factors to a delayed release,
> but those were all resolved to my knowledge.
>
> Blue skies... Todd

there were zip issues with 8.2.  i ended up replacing the zip 
drive line in fstab with a regular line and creating a new 
desktop icon based on the cdrom link (so it has an eject 
option on the right-click menu).  it worked fine after that.
-- 
Alan



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount stopped working?

2002-09-27 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 00:46, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Friday 27 September 2002 08:59 pm, you wrote:
> 
> > there were zip issues with 8.2.  i ended up replacing the zip
> > drive line in fstab with a regular line and creating a new
> > desktop icon based on the cdrom link (so it has an eject
> > option on the right-click menu).  it worked fine after that.
> 
> Ditto here, except I disabled supermount (may it rest in pieces, er peace) 
> and I created a new icon from the floppy drive link, which also gives you the 
> eject option in the right-click menu.
> 
> -- 
>   /\
>   Dark< >Lord

DL,

I know we've been over this before, you and I, but have you tried
checking out supermount under LM90 yet?

I thought I'd give it a whirl since I've got a masochistic streak. ;)

Just kidding.  I'd like to see it work with WineX and those games we
have, to tell the truth.

--LX

-- 
°°°
Kernel  2.4.18-6mdk Mandrake Linux  8.2
Enlightenment 0.16.5-11mdkEvolution  1.0.2-5mdk
Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/
°°°




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount stopped working?

2002-09-28 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 18:10, Todd Lyons wrote:
> > However, it doesn't want to eject: the eject button is ignored until I log 
> > out of KDE, only then I get my disk back. It seems the unmounting part is not 
> > working?
> 
> This is a KDE issue.  There's nothing you can do about it because that's
> the way KDE is designed.  :(  The only answer as you've discovered is to
> exit KDE.  There may be others, but I'm unaware of them.  Myself, I
> don't run KDE and don't have problems with any of my peripherals.

Yep, I've installed "winblows replacement" systems for friends using KDE
and I've seen the mount problems.  Especially with copy protected games
such as Diablo 2.  I personally never saw the problem on my workstation
because I run Enlightenment with KDE application support; therefore I
can run a "better" gui and still use all the neat KDE apps.  And without
the mount problems.  ;)

Peeps looking for a winblows replacement will need to have those KDE
problems resolved at some time or another tho.  The KDE guys really need
to make this an ipso facto priority.

 
> Blue skies... Todd
> -- 
> | MandrakeSoft USA | Security is like an onion.  It's made |
> | http://www.mandrakesoft.com  | made up of several layers and makes   |
> | http://www.mandrakelinux.com | you cry.  --Howard Chu|
>Cooker Version mandrake-release-9.0-0.3mdk Kernel 2.4.19-16mdk

L8r,

LX

-- 
°°°
Kernel  2.4.18-6mdk Mandrake Linux  8.2
Enlightenment 0.16.5-11mdkEvolution  1.0.2-5mdk
Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/
°°°




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount stopped working?

2002-09-28 Thread PlugHead

FWIW:  I noticed my cdrom acting flakey under KDE (it would eject when I 
pressed the button, but then immediately retract...) and the 'Eject' option 
on the icon didn't work.  Since this is an upgraded system (MDK 8.2 -> MDK 
9.0), I deleted the icon and re-created it--and it seems to work just fine 
(supermount and all.)

-Jason

On Saturday 28 September 2002 12:46 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Friday 27 September 2002 08:59 pm, you wrote:
> > there were zip issues with 8.2.  i ended up replacing the zip
> > drive line in fstab with a regular line and creating a new
> > desktop icon based on the cdrom link (so it has an eject
> > option on the right-click menu).  it worked fine after that.
>
> Ditto here, except I disabled supermount (may it rest in pieces, er peace)
> and I created a new icon from the floppy drive link, which also gives you
> the eject option in the right-click menu.

-- 

=
"Pets are always a great help in times of stress. And in times of
starvation too, o'course."
(Small Gods)




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount stopped working?

2002-09-28 Thread Ronald J. Hall

On Saturday 28 September 2002 02:12 am, you wrote:

> DL,
>
> I know we've been over this before, you and I, but have you tried
> checking out supermount under LM90 yet?

Nope, not yet - was gonna wait for the full release version (I have more luck 
with those)

> I thought I'd give it a whirl since I've got a masochistic streak. ;)

You too, eh? 

> Just kidding.  I'd like to see it work with WineX and those games we
> have, to tell the truth.
>
> --LX

Yeah, me too. I do have supermount still running with 8.2 on my son's comp, 
which is a lot simpler setup than my main machine. There, it seems to work 
just fine. I did have some trouble getting Soldier of Fortune 2 to work under 
WineX but it was the game itself, not supermount. (had to killall -9 wine 
when it asks for the 2nd CD, then copy the contents of the 2nd CD to the base 
directory of sof2 - after that, it worked fine. Good game, BTW).

-- 
  /\
  Dark< >Lord
  \/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [expert] Supermount stopped working?

2002-09-28 Thread Philip Webb

020928 various people wrote:
> the eject button is ignored until I log out of KDE:
> only then I get my disk back. It seems the unmounting part is not working?
--- 
> This is a KDE issue.
--- 
> I've installed "winblows replacement" systems for friends using KDE
> and seen the mount problems.  Esp with copy protected games, eg Diablo 2.
> I run Enlightenment with KDE application support,
> so I can run a "better" gui and still use all the neat KDE apps.
> And without the mount problems.  ;)
 
ok, i don't know what 'supermount' is, but i would never u/mount a CD w KDE.
i have  2  lines in  ~/.bashrc

  alias mcd='mount /dev/scd0 /mnt/cdrom; cd /mnt/cdrom'
  alias ucd='cd; umount /mnt/cdrom; eject'
 
and simply use the Konsole CLI to do the job.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,  Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT`-O--O---'  University of Toronto



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



  1   2   >