:
Subject: RE: (313)Final
scratch
04/02/04 02:43
PM
What's the overall opinion of final scratch -
a dj showing up to gig with a laptop vs decks
Just a question?
Because I have seen some use just the laptop
and final scratch and you just
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 313
313@hyperreal.org
uware.com cc:
Subject: RE: (313)Final
scratch
04/02/04 02:43
PM
What's the overall opinion of final
]To: 313
313@hyperreal.org
uware.com cc:
Subject: RE: (313)Final
scratch
04/02/04 02:43
PM
What's the overall opinion of final scratch
@hyperreal.org
uware.com cc:
Subject: RE: (313)Final
scratch
04/02/04 02:43
PM
What's the overall opinion of final scratch
:
Subject: RE:
(313)Final
scratch
04/02/04 02:43
PM
What's the overall opinion of final scratch -
a dj showing up to gig with a laptop vs decks
Just a question?
Because I
uware.com cc:
Subject: RE:
(313)Final
scratch
04/02/04 02:43
PM
What's the overall opinion of final
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 313
313@hyperreal.org
uware.com cc:
Subject: RE:
(313)Final
scratch
04/02/04 02:43
PM
Steward,
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 313
313@hyperreal.org
uware.com cc:
Subject: RE:
(313)Final
PROTECTED]To: 313
313@hyperreal.org
uware.com cc:
Subject: RE:
(313)Final
scratch
04/02/04 02:43
PM
Steward,
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 313
313@hyperreal.org
uware.com cc:
Subject: RE:
(313)Final
:
-
-
- Subject: RE:
- (313)Final
- scratch
- 04/02/04 02:43
- PM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- What's the overall opinion of final scratch -
- a dj showing up to gig with a laptop vs decks
a little high tho (12ms
vs. 7
for FS afaik).
robin...
- -Original Message-
- From:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- org] On Behalf Of josh23
- Sent: 03 April 2004 02:56
- To: 313@hyperreal.org
- Subject: RE: (313)Final scratch
-
-
- and, i was just trying to make a joke
What's the overall opinion of final scratch -
a dj showing up to gig with a laptop vs decks
Just a question?
Because I have seen some use just the laptop
and final scratch and you just don't get the same
vibe... But on the other hand I have seen Kevin
Saunderson use it along with decks and
:
Subject: RE: (313)Final scratch
04/02/04 02:43 PM
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bleep43 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thorin Teague [EMAIL PROTECTED];
313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch (fwd)
Ableton on the other hand has made non-DJs like
the mainboards
-Original Message-
From: Carissa Tintinalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 February 2004 5:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch
I think there's been an interesting economic impact, especially for
those
djs who don't or barely
: Bleep43 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thorin Teague [EMAIL PROTECTED];
313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch (fwd)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bleep43 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thorin Teague
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 February 2004 5:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch
I think there's been an interesting economic impact, especially for those
djs who don't or barely make an income from playing out.
Final Scratch has allowed a lot of djs I
- Original Message -
From: Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Phonopsia [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Bleep43 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thorin Teague [EMAIL PROTECTED];
313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch (fwd)
I wonder if anyone
I like their quote... it may not be the real thing... but at least you're
playing with vinyl! ehehe :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 February 2004 8:52 AM
To: Ryan Snowden
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Ryan Snowden wrote:
For all those enterprising young minds out there, it's time to
come up with
a similar version of final scratch and sell it at a cheaper cost
to undercut
final scratch :) In 5 years time we can't have final scratch dictating
prices can we? :)
How
I thought he was using Ableton Live.
-Original Message-
From: Bleep43 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 February 2004 10:02
To: Thorin Teague; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch (fwd)
It's a major technological breakthrough for the art of DJing, so therefore
Cc:
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch (fwd)
I thought he was using Ableton Live.
-Original Message-
From: Bleep43 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 February 2004 10:02
To: Thorin Teague; 313@hyperreal.org
have been saying about the set...
-Original Message-
From: Bleep43 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 February 2004 22:02
To: Thorin Teague; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch (fwd)
It's a major technological breakthrough for the art of DJing,
so therefore
I believe it was Ableton Live, all the way.
-Original Message-
From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 February 2004 10:17
To: Bleep43; Thorin Teague; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch (fwd)
I'm really annoyed that I didn't make it down on Saturday
Teague; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch (fwd)
I'm really annoyed that I didn't make it down on Saturday,
considering what I've heard about Surgeon's set that night!
But what I've still not gathered is whether he was using
Ableton Live or if he was just spinning on decks
- Of the two, I would say Ableton offers more advantages than
- Final Scratch
- but requires more prep work before a set. I really can't see
- the point in
- buying the vinyl side of Final Scratch unless you plan to do
- some scratching
- or love doing backspins.
there is something to be said
10/2/04 12:49 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Of the two, I would say Ableton offers more advantages than
- Final Scratch
- but requires more prep work before a set. I really can't see
- the point in
- buying the vinyl side of Final Scratch unless you plan to do
- some scratching
- or love doing
-Original Message-
From: Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 February 2004 12:55
there is something to be said for the intuitive interface
of a pair of decks with vinyl on them don't you think?
Not in my case, just seems pointless as I hate backspins and only ever
Kids are cool with it and they don't give a frig about all the gubbings,
kinda like my old man moaning about having to buy CD's - it's over...As
cool
as I think records are the next generation don't care and you won't make
them either...
I reckon I'm not that sure about that.
I think that a lot
- there is something to be said for the intuitive interface
- of a pair of
- decks with vinyl on them don't you think?
-
- Not in my case, just seems pointless as I hate backspins and
- only ever
- scratch me rude bits not me records...Wouldn't say it was
- intuitive either,
- more learned
10/2/04 1:15 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]@uk.pwc.com
Kids are cool with it and they don't give a frig about all the gubbings,
kinda like my old man moaning about having to buy CD's - it's over...As
cool
as I think records are the next generation don't care and you won't make
them either...
I
- Single sales are now the lowest they have ever been, in fact
- I was in a
- studio last week and the first thing they knocked out wasn't
- a rough mix, it
- was a fcuking ringtone!
nevermind the death of techno...this is the death of music!
robin...
I recently started using Ableton Live next to Traktor (FS), Vinyls and
Buzztracker. The freedom that comes along with this setup is pretty
genius. The only thing i miss right now are some Kaosspads II and
another set of arms/hands :)
The big thumb down of this setup:
It needs too much tablespace
This will always be the way but its not how the mass market works I'm
afraid, you can't force people at gun point...
well, yeah, I was making the point that I think there will still be kids
buying stuff coming through, I didnt mean in a mass-market kind of sense.
I'm talking about it in
but it always has been a tiny
majority. and rest assured the large scale music industry will find a way
to sell their products to the kids and collect the revenues. whether this
is via mp3 or whatever downloadable format, or via a hard copy of
something, I have no idea, but they'll still be
- well your kids are cool with it because it's free (and seen as
- rebellious) at the moment. when the music industry have all
- this locked
- down (and let's face it they are getting there) and people
- are paying 15
- quid (usual CD price) to download just data then they may face some
-
There's just no pleasing us I reckon.
well, thats for sure.
no, yeah, I get what you're saying now.
I thought you were mis-understanding me and I'm wound up as it is today.
but anyway
alex
_
- End of
- Thing is, most aren't paying for it - now that it's
- software, its wide open
- and no amount of encryption or copyright protection will
- save them - people
- aren't paying, fact...
12 months ago i'd have agreed with you there martin. at this point in
time tho i'm not sure the big players
10/2/04 2:34 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Thing is, most aren't paying for it - now that it's
- software, its wide open
- and no amount of encryption or copyright protection will
- save them - people
- aren't paying, fact...
12 months ago i'd have agreed with you there martin. at this point in
sorry to be a t**t, but I had to laugh...
1.25 billion made
its a rum do when you're only making that much huh?!
but, anyway, thats nothing to do with anything, so carry on!
btw, Martin, that report you mentioned, is that available on the internet
or anything, might help me understand all this
10/2/04 3:49 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- They know they've lost and the only way is to prosecutes
- individuals - last
- tactic - fear.
-
- 19 billion lost vs 1.25 made, my accountant would say that's
- NOT a fair
- amount.
snip
This is a figure from a independent professional report,
We're way off topic now (i'll be on topic by the end of this mail so
bear with me). The losses the companies attribute to
piracy/p2p internet downloads are way off target anyway, this
(19billion) is probably a RIAA figure.
It is as far as I'm aware - I think it's based on an estimate for
FWIW, a person I know works for a major label and is quite heavily
involved with that label's anti-p2p efforts. He tells me that while the
majors are confident that the next few years will see legitimate mp3
services eclipse the illegal ones in terms of visibility and prominence,
they have
:
02/10/04 07:34 AMSubject: RE: (313) final
scratch
the main hurdle to overcome is that people (myself included i guess)
like to get something tangible for their money, not just bits on a disk
(which could fail)i suppose one way aroud this is to make sure that
when you buy the tune in the digital format you want you effectively
have a
the counter-intuitive part of mixing is tuning your perception to two
different streams of audio at the same time.
statements like this sounds a lot like people who used to say it was
un-natural for people to listen to music made by machines.
something isn't un-natural just because you're not
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch
i think jeff mills, final scratch, richie hawtin, macintoshes, 909 sounds
and soul music (including Amp Fiddler) are all DEAD and/or
OVER/UNDER-RATED! and shxt, don't get me started on women in techno
;)
-d
-Original Message-
From: Rebekah Farrugia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not an authority on the matter by any stretch of the imagination, but my
gut instinct is that vinyl DJ'ing was about to die (relatively speaking--by
about to die I mean within 5 years), and final scratch probably single
handedly added at least 5-10 more years to the craft's lifespan (those
I think there's been an interesting economic impact, especially for those
djs who don't or barely make an income from playing out.
Final Scratch has allowed a lot of djs I know to sell off large chunks of
their record collections so they could make money to buy more records, buy
gear, press
It's a major technological breakthrough for the art of DJing, so therefore
it will have both positive and negative aspects. I'm seriously considering
buying it so that I can then start playing all genres of music when playing
out.
Surgeon's set at Split on Saturday in London confirmed to me what
enough to
live on without all the hassle and have direct contact and feedback. It's
not as far away as you may think.
Martin
- Original Message -
From: Bleep43 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thorin Teague [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: (313
not as far away as you may think.
Martin
- Original Message -
From: Bleep43 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thorin Teague [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch (fwd)
It's a major technological breakthrough for the art
[EMAIL
PROTECTED], Thorin Teague [EMAIL PROTECTED],
02/09/04 04:55 PM 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) final
scratch (fwd
the hassle and have direct contact and feedback.
It's
not as far away as you may think.
Martin
- Original Message -
From: Bleep43 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thorin Teague [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch
PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch
I think there's been an interesting economic impact, especially for those
djs who don't or barely make an income from playing out.
Final Scratch has allowed a lot of djs I know to sell off large chunks of
their record collections so they could
the sound system at gas (where fk played sat) is absolutely crap. that's why
he sounded crap on the eqs and echo/delay. on the vinyl sound system at body
and soul, fk's use of the eqs was beyond reproach (which can't be said for
joe claussel, he gets a wee bit carried away).
anyway, we were there
About FS and Traktor...John Tejada told me today that now
Tracktor has
merged with final scratch and are combining the two in a new
concept to be
presented this week at Namm (L.A)
I think It will be the next big thing !
...I suppose it will work on Mac too...
...but don't wait for me
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, James Bucknell wrote:
francois k played sydney last night using a titatium powerbook and two
turntables. looks like final scratch has been ported for mac osx!
so, anybody want to buy a few thousand classic chicago/detroit/new york
house and techno records?
you've burned
Now if they would just add some recording functionality, it would be a perfect
system. Sux you have to have an additional recording device just to record
yourself. It'd be nice if something like soundforge was built into this app.
Anyone know anything about possible upgrades??
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch recording?
Now if they would just add some recording functionality, it would be a
perfect system. Sux you have to have an additional recording device just to
record yourself. It'd be nice if something like soundforge was built into
this app.
Anyone know anything
Benn Glazier said:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:56:51 -0500, James Bucknell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
francois k played sydney last night using a titatium powerbook and two
turntables. looks like final scratch has been ported for mac osx!
so, anybody want to buy a few thousand classic
vinyls ;-) !
Fabrice Lig
http://www.multimania.com/fabricelig/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: scotto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch on mac!
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 14:50:26 -0800
it's coming very soon, but the likelihood is that what francois
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:25:59 +1100 (EST), David Gillies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Benn Glazier said:
I was less than impressed with the night to be honest. Mixing quite
ropey at times, however I found from about 3 to 4.30 was the best - left
shortly afterwards.
Nice to hear tunes like
Benn Glazier wrote on Sun, 12 Jan 2003 about following:
Nice to hear tunes like Maurizio's M4.5, Baby Wants to Ride by Frankie
Knuckles,
Jamie Principle actually ;-)
Interesting you say this.. As I have a copy of it on FFRR which credits
Jamie Principle, and the original (Trax
Could've been Traktor.
There's a few dj's who are using it these days.
Similar to FS but different.
G
James Bucknell wrote:
francois k played sydney last night using a titatium powerbook and two
turntables. looks like final scratch has been ported for mac osx!
so, anybody want to buy
Message -
From: Gerald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Cc: James Bucknell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch on mac!
Could've been Traktor.
There's a few dj's who are using it these days.
Similar to FS but different.
G
James
of it..
scotto
lansing, mi.
- Original Message -
From: Gerald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Cc: James Bucknell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch on mac!
Could've been Traktor.
There's a few dj's who are using
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:56:51 -0500, James Bucknell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
francois k played sydney last night using a titatium powerbook and two
turntables. looks like final scratch has been ported for mac osx!
so, anybody want to buy a few thousand classic chicago/detroit/new york
house
Final Scratch will be released for MacOS early this year. I'd say he'd
be one of the beta testers ;)
Peace,
Patrick.
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 10:11 AM, Benn Glazier wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:56:51 -0500, James Bucknell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
francois k played sydney last night
nah m8 - read the f/s site forums ... f/s can be run as part of a normal
distro (slackware, redhat etc)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 November 2002 20:04
To: logic7; Kookie; scotto; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Final Scratch
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, logic7 wrote:
FS requires a true linux partition, not a virtual one, it adds a bootloader
to the MBR so one can boot to either FS/Linux or Windows. It's not an
embedded linux either, it's more like a mini distribution.
Not so. FS 1.0 installs itself into a ~300MB
: Re: (313) Final Scratch mac Q
:
:If you have Mac X, it has the ability to emulate windows. There is a
:decent
:chance that you could run final scratch through the emulation
capabilities.
:- Original Message -
:From: scotto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:To: 313@hyperreal.org
:Sent: Tuesday, November
and
run FS?
scotto
lansing, mi
- Original Message -
From: Darren Longton (Marketing) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: scotto [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:01 PM
Subject: RE: (313) Final Scratch
From FinalScratch.com
Q) Will there be a Macintosh version
lynix on to the mac and
run FS?
scotto
lansing, mi
- Original Message -
From: Darren Longton (Marketing) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: scotto [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:01 PM
Subject: RE: (313) Final Scratch
From FinalScratch.com
Q
, November 12, 2002 2:34 PM
To: scotto; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Final Scratch mac Q
If you have Mac X, it has the ability to emulate windows. There is a decent
chance that you could run final scratch through the emulation capabilities.
- Original Message -
From: scotto [EMAIL
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:51 AM
Subject: RE: (313) Final Scratch mac Q
In theory, Final Scratch could simply be recompiled for PPC versions of
Linux. Then it would work with changes to hardware specific drivers and
whatnot.
Will they do it? Dunno. It's possible, but not always done
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:04 PM
To: logic7; Kookie; scotto; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Final Scratch mac Q
not really. it's not a matter of linux-to-PPC linux translation. FS
doesn't run on a full linux OS distribution. it's
True that. But FS runs on linux (not windows)
-Original Message-
From: Kookie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:34 PM
To: scotto; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Final Scratch mac Q
If you have Mac X, it has the ability to emulate windows
when the hell is the mac version coming out?
scotto
lansing, mi
- Original Message -
From: Cyclone Wehner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 Detroit 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 7:47 AM
Subject: (313) Final Scratch
From my 'Business Development Specialist' source at Jands
, November 11, 2002 10:29 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Final Scratch
when the hell is the mac version coming out?
scotto
lansing, mi
- Original Message -
From: Cyclone Wehner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 Detroit 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 7:47 AM
Subject
- Original Message -
From: Langsman, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:31 AM
Subject: [313] FiNal ScrAtch - finally roadtested...
The software is pretty good
too - you can see a waveform of the tune
This is something I'd not considered
had to look for myself... never saw it as a reality
http://www.finalscratch.com/
from:Tristan Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
date:Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:49:55
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org
subject: Re: [313] FiNal ScrAtch - finally roadtested...
- Original Message
by this report and like all reports I am starting to really
admire the FS and its potential..cheers Marc for this :)
-Original Message-
From: Langsman, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 September 2002 10:31
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: [313] FiNal ScrAtch - finally roadtested...
, September 19, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Langsman, Marc; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: [313] FiNal ScrAtch - finally roadtested...
by this report and like all reports I am starting to really
admire the FS and its potential..cheers Marc for this :)
-Original Message-
From: Langsman, Marc [mailto
I'd still be more than happy to buy new vinyl, but I could sample it and
then keep the originals in minty condition stashed away somewhere. I guess
if this really takes off then eventually record pressing will become a thing
of the past and labels might start punting mp3 online.
Im just thinking
, 2002 12:43 PM
:To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 313@hyperreal.org
:Subject: RE: [313] Final Scratch - thoughts...
:
:
:I'd still be more than happy to buy new vinyl, but I could sample it
and
:then keep the originals in minty condition stashed away somewhere. I
guess
:if this really takes off
PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org
subject: RE: [313] Final Scratch - thoughts...
And knowing people that run small label that can only afford to press
around 500 copies of a release I'm sure they'd be more than happy that
their release could reach a much larger audience.
:-Original Message
: [313] Final Scratch - thoughts...
I'd still be more than happy to buy new vinyl, but I could sample it and
then keep the originals in minty condition stashed away somewhere. I guess
if this really takes off then eventually record pressing will become a thing
of the past and labels might start
There are currently trading groups on IRC that record their vinyl
to mp3. This has been happening for years. The majority of these groups
don't post their material to P2P apps, even though some does get out. In
my opinion, it has been a nice way to get everything while only being
able to shell
Maybe. If you can sell all 500 copies!
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Neil Wallace wrote:
And knowing people that run small label that can only afford to press
around 500 copies of a release I'm sure they'd be more than happy that
their release could reach a much larger audience.
be
great for taking samples of films/tv etc too and be able to scratch them
10mins later :]
-Original Message-
From: Darren Longton (Merch) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 1:20 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: [313] Final Scratch - thoughts...
I don't think
-
From: Langsman, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Darren Longton (Merch); 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: [313] Final Scratch - thoughts...
I probably wouldnt bother buying any more scratch/breaks records either -
making your own by knocking together
Message-
:From: Kent williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 1:48 PM
:To: Neil Wallace
:Cc: 'Langsman, Marc'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
:Subject: RE: [313] Final Scratch - thoughts...
:
:Maybe. If you can sell all 500 copies!
:
:On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Neil
well ive certainly seen a number of small labels who either:
a) encourage people to download their stuff as a 'try before you buy'
thing.
b) do not mind that there are people who download and then don't buy. I
guess the reason behind this is these people are music fans rather than
MikeD wrote on Thu, 19 Sep 2002 about following:
There are currently trading groups on IRC that record their vinyl
to mp3. This has been happening for years. The majority of these groups
i've heard some of these releases, many of them skip, have bad
scratches, sound quiet..
but i do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for example, Delsin's new
compilation, or one of the new submerge CD's from a napster type site is
very very wrong, it's like stealing in my opinion.
That is stealing. I don't think Neil was advocating this, his point
remains that if a small label wants people to
i tend to remove noise rumble, scratches and stuff and remaster the
tracks for louder volume, as well as EQ them a bit.
sakke
I already knew I was off the scale on my lack of knowledge of audio
technology but that just rams it home. Just out of curiousity can I ask how
you do that? (Pls keep
I can see some benefits for small labels to Final Scratch amongst the many
questions it raises.
One thing that any small independent label wants is as many DJs spinning thier
releases as possible. The costs involved of mailing out x number of promo
copies to DJs who you will more than likley
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
