Coming in a couple of months late here, but I've just been through a move
from Windows/Adobe CF/MS SQL Server to Linux/Railo/MySQL and found a couple
of things not previously mentioned.
Windows -> Linux: already covered above, but I'll just add that anything
that turns into a file name (like CFC
Hi Jonathon,
There's only one thisContact variable, which is being reused each time
through the loop. So all you need to do is put:
right at the start. There's an indeterminate number of values that are
passing through that one variable on their way into the array, but it's
still one variabl
Just a thought: if you're carting an external disk back and forth, why not
put a VM with SQL Express and your databases on that disk? Personally I run
a little VM farm with SQL and CF all off the one eSATA disk. All is kosher
as far as SQL is concerned, and if you need to get data onto another s
I can't comment on whether for your app singleton is right or not. Just be
aware that in CF singleton is much more common than in Java, largely due to
the much higher object instantiation overhead.
Jaime
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Andre Kapp wrote:
>
> Tks Leigh
>
> I changed all the vari
Andre,
Yeah, looks like singleton, but you'd have to find where the service is
instantiated to be sure. Throw it back to the guys who wrote the code
anyway! They should be var scoping always.
Don't know about the classid. You can of course get the hashcode - see
http://www.compoundtheory.com/
Andre,
Is this DAO a singleton? I notice the queries aren't var scoped. If this
is a singleton under load another thread could easily overwrite your
trans_insert variable in between issuing the query and logging the generated
key.
Jaime
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Andre Kapp wrote:
>
>
Andrew G,
But...:)
A single request won't necessarily keep the same connection, especially
under load. So unless you use a transaction, it's entirely possible for the
insert query to run on one connection, and the select last_insert_id() to
run on another connection. See http://lagod.id.au/blog
Andrew,
I can't help thinking the code you haven't shown is important. Are you
creating a CF thread? And are any of your variables in shared scopes?
Transactions and threads don't necessarily work the way you might expect.
There are lots of possibilites for cross-talk between threads, connectio
It might be worth looking at the connection settings in SQL studio. SQL
studio by default will truncate long fields, which may be hiding row size
limitations. If you bump up the field length limit in SQL studio and it
still works, that would point even more strongly to JDBC.
Jaime
On Fri, Nov
A transaction that has rolled back due to a deadlock should always be
retried at least once. Unless your server is chronically ill or you use
massively long transactions, the chances of getting the same deadlock twice
in a row are pretty small.
Jaime
> -Original Message-
> From: b...@b
Visual Paradigm is the only one I've used where I feel like I'm drawing
rather than filling out forms. It has about a million features I don't use,
but I just stick to basic drawings.
Jaime
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard White [mailto:rich...@j7is.co.uk]
> Sent: Sunday, 29 Mar
>
> I'd want to see some pretty solid benchmarks before I
> believed that the Java written by CF is 200 times slower than
> the Java written by a random programmer.
The 200 times difference comes from my own comparison of the same domain
model implemented idiomatically in both ColdFusion/ColdS
Answering for myself, not for Dan:
1. Java is a squillion times faster than CF (OK, it's only about 200 times
faster - might as well be a squillion)
2. That means it becomes feasible to create a truly cohesive OO domain
model, which can be a lifesaver for large apps.
3. And once you have that dom
I do this frequently. Works well.
Jaime
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Root [mailto:rick.r...@webworksllc.com]
> Sent: Monday, 9 February 2009 9:51 AM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: dynamic names for named locks
>
>
> Is it possible to use named locks with dynamic names?
>
> I've got
ubject: Re: Connection pooling - why bother?
>
>
> Oh man, you fell for it. Now Jochem has all your datasource
> passwords. :)
>
> His plan for total world annihilation is one step closer now...
>
> ~Brad
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jaim
Feb 3, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Jaime Metcher wrote:
> > And for the CF datasource:
> > > class="coldfusion.server.ServiceFactory"
> > factory-method="getDataSourceService"/>
> > factory-bean="CFDataSourceService"
> > factor
k that).
Jaime
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:joch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2009 5:00 AM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: Connection pooling - why bother?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Jaime Metcher wrote:
>
Hey Cutter,
> in our environment we would be insane not to use connection pooling.
...unless it's actually faster to not use connection pooling. So is it?
Jaime
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and d
+1 for jMeter. It's not *too* finicky...
Coupla nice features worth mentioning:
1. You can set it to either remember or forget cookies. With cookies on,
you can script a whole login sequence and use that as your load test. With
cookies off, you can stress your server with 50,000 live sessions i
Jessica,
I'm making some big assumptions here. Firstly, I'm presuming you don't want
to go as far as having a real distributed authentication mechanism like CAS,
Kerberos or Shibboleth, and that your servers aren't authenticating against
a Windows AD. Secondly, I'm presuming there's no way to ge
Ryan,
For the highest throughput, you're right of course. But even a modest
hardware configuration can easily handle thousands of database queries per
second. Do you really need to avoid hitting the database?
Jaime
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan J. Heldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Richard,
There was a ton of discussion on this just recently - maybe on CFCDEV - so
there might be a bit of validation fatigue out there. On the upside, you
should find rich pickings in the list archives.
Basically both of your proposed solutions sound fine. If there was a
consensus (not sure i
Well, it's kind of cool that cf-talk is having the TDD argument. Don't
really mind how it turns out. Makes me feel good about being a CF
programmer.
@Bill,
Thanks for the links. The thing that intrigues me about a lot of the TDD
debate, including these articles you point to, is that most of the
> -Original Message-
> From: s. isaac dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2008 3:06 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: TDD vs. Big Ball of Mud (was Re: fusebox vs model glue)
>
> And so it's an assumed that the TDD advocates who talk about writing all
> your tests befo
+1 to POI. jXLS is also nice if you need templating.
But +2 to SSIS (or similar). CF as a data pump just does not scale.
Jaime
> -Original Message-
> From: Dawson, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 August 2008 1:56 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Best method for E
If you block APNIC's range you're blocking the whole of the Asia/Pacific
region. APNIC is not an ISP or large company, it's actually the regional
authority for internet addresses, so it owns *all* addresses in Asia/Pacific
- just like ARIN owns all addresses in North America and RIPE owns all
addr
Rob,
With pooled connections you can force a request to stay on one connection by
wrapping your queries in cftransaction. Otherwise, CF can and will swap
connections on you right in the middle of processing a request, and your
temp tables will go away.
Jaime
> -Original Message-
> From
There's a bunch of transaction log analysis tools out there. We use
Redgate's SQL Log Rescue.
On a busy site the transaction logs are voluminous and take a long time to
analyze. Depending on your situation you may actually be better off
analyzing the injected queries, perhaps running them on a
Just to add to Brian's comments: it can also be useful to just lay down
some integration tests using Selenium or the like prior to a TDD refactoring
effort. You'll be going through and reviewing the existing functionality
anyway, so you might as well record how it behaves.
Jaime
> -Original
Lifted from Transfer:
Thanks, Mark!
Jaime
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 14 July 2008 10:22 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Am I a thread or not ?
>
>
> How
Have you tried making the perm size bigger again? With lots of apps,
especially if any of them are using frameworks, you'll be using the perm gen
pretty heavily. If your app is freezing with plenty of headroom left in the
heap, perm gen is certainly a suspect.
Jaime
> -Original Message-
name = name_param,
description = description_param,
dao = createTestDAO()
)
Hope this helps
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 26 Ma
or more detail and you
shall receive.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, 25 May 2008 10:29 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: cfcs good practise
>
>
> hi
>
> just wondering what you guys think about
that James
mentions.
You can avoid both of these problems by wrapping the relevant code in a
- the transaction binds the connection to the CF thread -
but, like all locking, you have to consider the impact on throughput.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: James Smith [mailto:
This gets the hostname:
IP address would be something similar.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Sonny Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 27 March 2008 5:17 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Determining The Server's IP
>
>
> I was wonde
ter. Most of Google's services are
>in perpetual beta, because they need people to test their product.
Are you saying Google doesn't use automated tests?
Jaime Metcher
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the m
Folder: Click on the folder you want in the Navigator view, then choose
"Selected Resources" in the search dialog.
Site: Ditto, but start at the site root
Jaime
> -Original Message-
> From: j s [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 March 2008 1:11 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Find
Depends on the kinds of rules. I often end up with a strategy object e.g.
PermissionsStrategy or PricingStrategy.
Jaime
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 21 February 2008 2:01 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFC Naming Convention Quest
assigned to a worker thread. Obviously CF8 changes the game, but I presume
you've ruled out memory issues, infinite loops, pathological GCs etc?
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Mandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2008 3:28 PM
Brian,
I would also recommend POI with Ben Nadel's POIUtility, but if you want to
stick with a DSN, the following includes a way to unlock the datasource:
http://cfregex.com/cfcomet/Excel/index.cfm?ArticleID=0239B2E5-5FED-11D3-B3E9
004033E03EF9
No idea if it still works in CFMX 6/7/8.
n the list of search hits might link
to a calendar event, a particular FAQ, a document or just a plain old web
page.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Shaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 26 November 2007 9:18 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Combine Docu
hard to know whether you've
killed the problem or not, until it happens again.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 22 November 2007 3:57 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: SOLVED: Race Condition and Locking?
>
That error is a totally non-specific object instantiation error. That third
sentence (...must not be an interface...) is just a stab in the dark by some
engineer trying to be "helpful". Look down the full stack trace to find out
what the real error is.
Jaime Metcher
> That looks v
Surely the Smith project has one? For that matter, cfeclipse itself is
obviously doing some sort of parsing, no?
Jaime
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Mandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2007 9:04 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF Coding Standards
>
>
> Gaul
Janet,
+1 to dbunit. You also have the option of wrapping each unit test in a
transaction and then rolling it back at the end.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Janet MacKay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 5 October 2007 3:28 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject
guru!):
3. Earn the munchkin's pathetic gratitude by freeing them from their
drudgery
Course you could just use someone else's system, but where's the glory in
that :)
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesd
Hope I'm not just spreading FUD, but I suspect that's not possible. On
W2K3, the only way to get a mapped drive letter is to run CF under a login
session - i.e., login to the server, map the drive, then start CF as a
console app. I'd presume XP would be the same.
Jaime Metcher
lizable transactions for "stop the world"
database maintenance tasks.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 September 2007 4:32 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Odd database behavior: duplicate key error
&
yself, but my copy of CF8 is still
in a box on my desk.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Sheehan-Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2007 7:14 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Odd behavior when using cfform inside a CFC
>
>
>
Well, this really is just a wild guess, but maybe it's worth trying
re-instantiating the CFC on every request. CFFORM could be stashing some
state in that CFC.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Sheehan-Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 10 Se
d
word it looks a bit dodgy. You'd want to at least var scope that result
variable, e.g.
etc.
@Andrew:
You're implying that the "V" layer in MVC not be implemented using CFCs,
right? Any particular reason why?
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Charl
/api/
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=java.awt.toolkit+%22image+cache%22&b
tnG=Search&meta=
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Harrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2007 4:48 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Clear Ob
+1. I'd have a close look at that SDC, it may be more far-reaching than you
think. I've seen standard environments that exclude Flash, Java, ActiveX
controls, Javascript (!), cookies, and external links to all but an approved
list of sites.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Messag
on of whether
this is a serious possibility for them. Maybe if there's enough demand it'd
move up the priority list?
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2007 12:32 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE
ameworks...but maybe save that for next weekend :) Good luck!
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Sorteberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 10 August 2007 9:11 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: I'm Old - ColdFusion 4.x
>
>
> I haven't been
LOL. I miss those perl days, when hackers were real hackers and the top
line of the keyboard was nervous.
> -Original Message-
> From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 9 August 2007 12:57 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: any idea how to
>
>
> "([\d]{4})([\d]{2
x27;ve been unable to reproduce on dev, and don't want
to load down production with instrumentation. My current plan is to upgrade
to CF8 and a) see if the leak goes away and b) get into the JVM 1.6 good
stuff like JHAT.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Calvert Re
ome pretty beefy log
files. Maybe start with your FusionReactor settings, and take a look at the
CP logs?
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: John Beynon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 August 2007 7:49 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: massive jrun -out.log files
litude you could return test UUIDs from out of a preset
list - not sure how sensitive your testing needs to be.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Chastain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 27 July 2007 3:18 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Unit Testin
omething, but I
really don't know what the options are here - maybe open a cursor?
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Garth Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 July 2007 2:14 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Writing large data files
>
>
&
> Pragmatic Project Automation with Ant is a good lite start.
>
> You can also take a look at the DBUnit task for Ant which will help
> you reset your database(s)... :)
>
+1. The Redgate tools are great. DBUnit/Ant take
e a documentation mechanism with no runtime impact that is similarly
structured and introspectable.
Jaime Metcher
~|
Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2.
Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free Trial
http://www.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2007 7:59 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Metadata for code documentation (was RE: SURVEY RESULTS: Is
> ColdFusion OO?)
>
>
> On Wednesday 11 Jul 2007, Jaime Met
ot too hard to parse the metadata into XMI and produce a UML diagram,
if that's what floats your boat. And I know there's somebody out there
(sorry -forgot who you are) who uses cfproperty tags to document composition
relationships.
This *is* just documentation, *not* an attempt to
to the world.
I wouldn't want to do that in most cases, and if I was really doing a quick
and dirty hack I'd just use the "this" scope and save myself the trouble of
even writing the generic get/set.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Skinner [mailt
d from a page of code (any page). If they say
nothing more than "this is a loop followed by a query" I'm not impressed.
If they say "Hey, it looks like you've coded your own free text search here.
Are you trying to work
Total RAM used is *not* the sum of the "Mem usage" and "VM" columns in task
manager. See http://shsc.info/WindowsMemoryManagement - the punchline is
right at the end.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: James Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
RAM pays for itself before morning tea on Monday. Everything else I
mentioned above (other than the MS Office stuff) is free. What are the
super rich CF developers spending their money on?
Jaime Metcher
~|
ColdFusion MX7 an
upload to production, but we use a gui tool
called directory toolkit (we have mapped drive access to the production
server). By default directory toolkit ignores hidden files, so the .svn
files aren't a problem.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Cutter (CFRelated) [ma
Yeah, like:
Ten: one to write the code, one to make sure it's not Java, one to make sure
it's better than PHP, one to scan the press for adverse comments, and six to
argue about which framework to use.
Sorry - best I could do.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From:
Right-click, Jump to end tag?
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: AJ Mercer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2007 7:28 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: cfEclipse :: Find closing tag
>
>
> Not for me - that maximises the edit window
>
n using flex Builder a lot and it publishes the
> compiled swf and HTML to the destination directory each time.. is
> there something similar when using CFEclipse to edit HTML/CFM/CFC
> files?
No need.
>
> If I'm also using Subversion and something like Subclipse (I ha
C on improving the teams practices,
completely rewritten all of A's code, and participated in interviewing for
A's replacement. So A's contribution is that D is now very tired.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent
Andrew,
Where's your blog? I did google it - do you have any idea how many people
out there are pretending to be you?
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2007 10:37 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Sub
asy to simulate some of the bizarro form
transmissions that only real users and spambots seem to be able to create -
you know, missing fields, strange query string parameters, a list of 2,000
porno sites in a form field that's supposed to be a yes/no radio button...
So I tend to use s
to a shared CF environment.
The head revision of trunk must be deployable at all times (i.e. it is "the
build").
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 11 May 2007 12:18 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Subvers
thing (maybe with slightly different emphases). We all
create abstractions for a living here, surely we can cope with that.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2007 3:00 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Subv
It's thoroughly unreliable even if not spoofed. Some browsers won't set it,
some proxies will mask it or strip it out.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric J. Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 May 2007 1:02 PM
> To: CF-Talk
&g
Put the session ID in the form and then check to see if the session has
expired.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric J. Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 May 2007 12:44 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: defeating offline form posts
>
>
&g
I'd always want an "open" version that will take any user ID, then another
layer over that that enforces the rules about what user ID can be passed in.
Otherwise you have a hell of a time writing admin systems or unit tests.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
>
There are #tracker.getSessionCount()# active
sessions
There are #count_logged_in# logged in users
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2007 12:03 PM
ndex.cfm?mode=entry&entry=1075
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/222064
Ultimately, though, neither browsers nor proxies are obliged to honour your
caching directives.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dunaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 13 April 2007 11:33 PM
> T
that can *look* like a new session is being created,
where in fact all that's happened is you've clobbered your existing session
variables. But the fact that Jason is seeing new session IDs indicates that
the problem is something completely different. Yes?
Jaime Metcher
> -Original
race condition, but in itself, no way.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, 15 April 2007 9:46 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Using CFCs in session scope - need cflock help
>
>
> Jaime,
>
> In th
e would be an impact you care about, put the
querying of the state and the operation where you use it as close together
as possible and wrap them in a lock.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 14 April 2007 1:04 PM
&
y, though, neither browsers nor proxies are obliged to honour your
caching directives.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dunaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 13 April 2007 11:15 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Using CFCs in session scope - need cfl
ve the
language features for OO, but trying to think OO with one eye on the
performance monitor is just a bit too schizoid for me. Now it's up to Adobe
to tune the app server. Failing that, you can always write your model in
Java.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Daws
Also check your exception log. Even if an error does make it to the browser
it should be logged there.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 7 April 2007 6:58 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: cfcontent excel
We do this by actually removing the excluded keys from the search collection
after it is built, like this:
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 29 March 2007 6:40 AM
> To: CF-Talk
&
Jon,
Yes - it's called Smalltalk ;P
Also, check out Nando's series of articles
http://aria-media.com/blog/index.cfm/oo-in-cf
Seriously, I agree there's a lot of crap to learn, although my crap list is
different. And IMHO, a lot of the crap is there because a) J2EE has a lot
of stuff to support
,
which of course hangs around for future reference.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: joe smiths [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2007 4:36 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CFCs and the THIS scope
>
>
> Given the files below - why does update1(
of data into shared scopes, the
GC could be thrashing.
I'd highly recommend a management tool like Fusion Reactor. The ability to
look into the guts of a running thread can clear the fog in a microsecond.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Musial [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
No need to var arguments.
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2007 10:05 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: udf var
>
>
> I haven't built a simple udf in forever, but decided to do one
&g
no customer, so there is no truth. Only a spec,
which is an entirely different thing.
Jaime Metcher
-Original Message-
From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 11:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fizzbuzz. Simple programming problems.
I think this is
hitecture to
the advantage of child directories. I would say this is not a bug at
all.
...
Ben Nadel
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX7 Developer
www.bennadel.com
Need ColdFusion Help?
www.bennadel.com/ask-ben/
-----Original Message-
From: Jaime Metcher [mailto:[EMAIL PR
's security concerns - the web
server can't see the CFCs under any circumstances, but the CF server will
quite happily find them and read them.
Jaime Metcher
-Original Message-
From: Ben Nadel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 7 February 2007 9:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subjec
you want me to email you a copy of the document.
Jaime Metcher
-Original Message-
From: Nathan C. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 February 2007 8:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: moving from CF 4.5 to 7.0
I'm in the process of doing this now. And 4.0 to 6.1 before t
Maybe unrelated, but there is a current issue with cfscript that produces
these symptoms.
http://trac.cfeclipse.org/cfeclipse/report/1
Jaime Metcher
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Holden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 5 February 2007 8:35 AM
> To: CF-Talk
&
98 matches
Mail list logo
