RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]

2003-09-09 Thread Zhao Frank
I share my idea with you blow: Please application 2 ISDN lines and buy 2 ISDN modems, in china, you only need to pay RMB 50 per month for the lines, so cheap. Good luck! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75139t=75019

RE: can we tell the hotmail email is send from whi [7:73462]

2003-08-04 Thread Frank Kim
Try showing full header on the email. You might be able to dig it out from the X-originating IP. Cheers, Frank Kim, Manager Sales and Marketing Loud Packet, Inc. 26755 Jefferson Ave. Suite F Murrieta, CA 92562 Direct: 909-757-5119 Office: 909-894-8240 ext. 8010 Fax:909-494-4425 Email

UPDATED INFO: (was RE: a really big bug ) [7:72534]

2003-07-17 Thread Frank Jimenez
All interested parties might want to re-review the PSIRT advisory at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030717-blocked.shtml Please make sure that you are reading the latest advisory (Version 1.3 as of this email) Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 Systems Engineer Cisco Systems, Inc. [EMAIL

Re: number of CCIE [7:70151]

2003-06-27 Thread garcia frank
easier to me now in comparison to what I saw the last time. Either way, I'm a proud high number CCIE. Frank Garcia, CCIE #11013 Unemployed, looking for work as a Real Estate Agent Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71507t=70151

RE: New Instructor Experiences [7:62826]

2003-02-11 Thread Frank Jimenez
it for a Video-on-demand session. Urg. Makes me wish that they'd just use a handheld camera and not tell me it's in the room. :-( Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 Systems Engineer Cisco Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Cat6500 PSU interoperability [7:60949]

2003-01-22 Thread Frank Jimenez
and CatOS assumes the lower capacity PS to be the 'correct' Wattage for both. Just a guess. Although it appears to function, I don't know that I'd trust it completely or if TAC would have an issue with it. Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Steve Lilley

RE: Cat6500 PSU interoperability [7:60949]

2003-01-13 Thread Frank Jimenez
Yes and no. In combined mode they may be different wattages. In redundant mode wattages must be identical. More detail at: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_c onfiguration_guide_chapter09186a008007e6f6.html Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: CCIE Vs. BS or MS degree [7:59481]

2003-01-07 Thread Frank Jimenez
. Frank Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60532t=59481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations

RE: Security CCIE LAB [7:60553]

2003-01-07 Thread Frank Jimenez
Since both are allowed in 5.2, you should be able to use either set of commands if asked. Having said that, the trend is definitely toward access-lists rather than the conduit format in the real world. IIRC, the new FWSM module doesn't allow conduits at all. Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL

RE: PIX 501 VPN Peers limit [7:60430]

2003-01-06 Thread Frank Jimenez
t09186a0080091b18.html You can support up to 5 SA's with the PIX 501, regardless of user license. Also need the PIX-501-VPN-3DES= license to run 3DES. Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sam

New Cisco.com Website PLEASE REPORT BROKEN LINKS! (was RE: Off [7:60441]

2003-01-06 Thread Frank Jimenez
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE go to: http://www.cisco.com/ciscodotcom/toolkit/submit_a_question.html and submit dead links you run across to the support team under 'Report a Broken Link'. Can't make it better if no one knows the problem is there. THANK YOU! Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Adding a port to be part of 2 VLANs [7:60439]

2003-01-06 Thread Frank Jimenez
It's all on the web. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps628/products_configura tion_guide_chapter09186a00800c6f0c.html Start with 'Configuring VLAN trunks'. Good luck! Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 Systems Engineer Cisco Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message

RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285]

2003-01-05 Thread Frank Jimenez
before I could get it to work right. Wouldn't hurt to make sure that the server is patched to current revs as well. Frank Jimenez, CCIE #738 Systems Engineer Cisco Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arnold, Jamie

RE: On Topic Design Question - sizing a router or switch [7:60374]

2003-01-05 Thread Frank Jimenez
into the technical details of flow rates, CPU usage, latency needs, etc. Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 Systems Engineer Cisco Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of The Long and Winding Road Sent: Sunday, January 05

Re: SNMP Filter [7:60100]

2003-01-02 Thread Frank
that address on port 161. This is what you mean I think but I would advise you to use the first example. cheers Frank On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:52:53 GMT, Michael wrote: Dear All I have a few C7507 sereis routers with a lot of fram-relay and ll customers. How can I filter SNMP requests on the C7507

RE: NM-1E2W [7:60135]

2003-01-02 Thread Frank Jimenez
Network Module and Platform Compatibility Matrix for Cisco 2600 and 3600 Series Routers (watch the word wrap): http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps3129/products_tech_note 09186a00800ae37f.shtml NM-1E2W only supported in the 3620, 3640, and 3660. Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL

RE: CCNP VoIP AVVID [7:60143]

2003-01-02 Thread Frank Jimenez
The CCIE IP Telephony Beta Exam is for the CS Lab track... Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric Rogers Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP VoIP

RE: CCIE Vs. BS or MS degree [7:59481]

2003-01-02 Thread Frank Jimenez
always found that programming in LISP was much more efficient after the indigestion of alcoholic beverages Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003

RE: Cisco career advice needed [7:60013]

2002-12-31 Thread Frank Jimenez
of. Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 Systems Engineer Cisco Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of irfan siddiqui Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 3:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco career advice needed [7:60013] Hi

RE: campus LAN design w/DHCP server [7:59578]

2002-12-20 Thread Frank Jimenez
/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_note09186a 0080114aee.shtml Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 Systems Engineer Dallas Commercial Cisco Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 7:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Cisco tools for pocket pc 2002 [7:59465]

2002-12-18 Thread Frank Dagenhardt
Hello all, I was wondering if anyone had come accross any useful tools for the pocket pc that are cisco related. Thanks in advance, Frank W. Dagenhardt [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of Frank W. Dagenhardt (E-mail).vcf] Message

RE: Auto-Negotiation or Manual Configuration [7:58904]

2002-12-11 Thread Frank Jimenez
The trick here is that you have to manually set both sides. You would not believe the number of times that I've seen production networks with auto-negotiation set on the PC and full duplex/speed 100 manually set on the switch. That doesn't work one bit. Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL

RE: OT finding station trying to become MasterBrowser [7:58701]

2002-12-06 Thread Frank Jimenez
also start at the core switch and do either a 'show cam dynamic' or a 'show mac-address-table' and try to follow the uplinks until you end up at an access port with your MAC address Good Luck! Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 Systems Engineer Cisco Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message

RE: FW: Storage Area Networking [7:56857]

2002-11-07 Thread Frank Dagenhardt
own, that machine would then share it out to the other machines, unless you used a snapshot or a clone of that disk, but then the other servers would have to be connected to the SAN. Frank I have, related to this last part of NAS vs SAN. Can we use SAN as a NAS? I mean, can we share (the same

RE: Storage Area Networking [7:56857]

2002-11-05 Thread Frank Dagenhardt
There is no more risk in the san than would be in a normal array. You still have controllers and disks that can fail. Frank -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:sthurlow;webvein.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Storage Area

FW: Storage Area Networking [7:56857]

2002-11-05 Thread Frank Dagenhardt
. Frank -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 7:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Storage Area Networking [7:56857] Is anyone using Storage Area Networking? How do you use it? How well does it work? What problems

Terminal Server [7:56454]

2002-10-29 Thread Frank Dagenhardt
Hi All, I was wondering if anyone had any advice on a good 8 port terminal server. I would prefer to get cisco but the cost is a little much. Does anyone have experience with a different brand that does the job at close to the same quality? Thank you in advance, Frank Message Posted

RE: Native IOS on 6500 vs 3500EMI for lab study? [7:55972]

2002-10-20 Thread Frank Merrill
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote: The 3550 and 6500 use different CLI's. The 3550 is IOS-based and the 6500 is set-based. There really isn't a good alternative for the 3550 switch. You Whoa, hold on there a second. Although the 6500 and 3550 CAN have different OS's, they don't necessarily HAVE TO

RE: Cisco 2900 switch [7:55566]

2002-10-14 Thread Frank Merrill
Since you are trying to 'copy running-config startup-config' I would assume then that it's a 2900XL series switch, and not one of the 2900 series switches that runs CatOS? (2901, 2902, 2926, CiscoPro 2200, etc..) Not that I necessarily have an answer for you, but just wanting to make certain you

RE: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 r [7:55586]

2002-10-14 Thread Frank Merrill
Symon Thurlow wrote: Well, I would view an ISP who uses 1918 addresses in their public network a little warily. Traceroute etc are pretty fundamental problem solving tools IMHO I'm not certain if it's still true or not, but if you mean on links to customer sites, then in the past several

RE: Enable Secret of AS5300 [7:55086]

2002-10-08 Thread Frank Merrill
I lost the enable secret password of my Cisco AS5300.I have the configuration showing. enable secret 5 $1$6YRM$nzNXQuv4h24C3AlB8N3rp. enable password 7 110A1016141D5A One more point, since you have an 'enable secret' configured, the 'enable password' serves no purpose. When you type

RE: IOS Port range command [7:55139]

2002-10-08 Thread Frank Merrill
I did this on a 3550-24: Switch(config)#int range f0/1 -24 Switch(config-if-range)#no shut Switch(config-if-range)# 1w0d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/1, changed state to down 1w0d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/2,

RE: Frame LMI [7:55120]

2002-10-08 Thread Frank Merrill
I have to admit that that is one nice thing about Wellfleet/Bay/Nortel routers. They built in pcap (Packet Capture) years ago, and it's actually exportable/convertible to a sniffer format for analysis. Alas, not on a cisco... But I'm sure someone here will provide a more useful answer than the

Re: Even more confused: Was: New CCIE Lab Policy?? [7:55046]

2002-10-07 Thread Frank Merrill
Hmm... I don't see where it says one year, I do see that it says 18 months, and then within 12 months after the first attempt (if failed of course). fgm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55055t=55046 -- FAQ, list

Config-register???? [7:54632]

2002-10-01 Thread Frank Lodato
I broke in to a Cisco 2600 router today, but I didn't have access to my handy sheet that tells me exactly what config-register setting to type in. Instead of 0x2142 I put 0x2124. Now when I hard bott the router it gives me'JJJ^^' . Now, I've never seen this

Re: Config-register???? [7:54632]

2002-10-01 Thread Frank Lodato
NO, here are my symptoms, Now, I can't: -type commands after the J's finish appearing -CTRL break does stop the J's, but nothing on the keyboard works properly so I can't type in any commands -hard boot gives the same results everytime.(J's) and that's it -I haven't let the router sit for a

RE: Token Ring [7:53774]

2002-09-22 Thread Frank Merrill
should be all set. Good Luck! Frank Merrill Juan Blanco wrote: Team, Could any tell me what I am doing wrongI am trying to bring up my token-ring interface up? I connect the TR interface with a Token Ring 4-16 - media filter via a rj45 strait cable to mau(smc elite mau 4016rn

RE: OT: Outlets England [7:53864]

2002-09-22 Thread Frank Merrill
are. Good Luck and don't forget to visit the Rainforest Cafe in Piccadilly Circus if you get a chance. Frank Merrill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53872t=53864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http

RE: OSPF MTU [7:53047]

2002-09-10 Thread Frank Merrill
in the Cisco log. It's been in operation for over a year now. Have fun, Frank Merrill Neither router should have the MTU set to bigger than the maximum as specified by the relevant standards for the data link in use, but one of the routers could be set with an MTU that is smaller than the max allowed

RE: Setting up Lab [7:52708]

2002-09-05 Thread Frank Merrill
Check anthonypanda dot com for the DTE/DCE back-to-back cables. There are other sources such as ccbootcamp dot com, and kg2 dor com. And, never forget to check ebay. Just do a search on 'cisco back' and you'll find a ton of them. Good Luck! Message Posted at:

RE: how can i erase flash mem for a router which doesn [7:52677]

2002-09-04 Thread Frank Merrill
Well, isn't it likely that the problem is exactly what the error is telling you? You have 32MB memory. The Max on a 1710 is 48MB. Does that image require 48? Actually, I can't even find the 1710 in the upgrade planner. If I select a 1720 instead, and then change the URL to indicate a 1710

RE: CAT6500 rebooting into boot mode [7:52654]

2002-09-04 Thread Frank Merrill
First, what is the config-register set to on that MSFC? Is that why a reload is causing it to go to ROM monitor? (should probably be 0x2102) In other words, are these two seperate issues? Is it returning to monitor any time it relaods. or just after this failure? As far as the Nortel router

RE: flash copy failed checksum error [7:51834]

2002-08-21 Thread Frank Merrill
One other possibility (this happened to me recently as I'm buying equipment for my lab) is that it doesn't really have 16MB of flash. I had this happen (on a 2524 as a matter of fact!) when I received a router that was listed as having 16MB flash and indeed reported 16MB. The image on it when I

RE: Cisco quot;Frankenquot; Pix Firewall [7:51119]

2002-08-09 Thread Frank Jimenez
You know the only problem with the FrankenPIX is that the bolts on the side keep you from putting it into a standard rack... Frank Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gabriel Ruiz Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2

6506 [7:50418]

2002-08-01 Thread Frank Dagenhardt
Hi All, I was wondering if anyone had run into any problems when using a sup2 and the new 6148 board. Cisco says that we should be using 7.2.2, but we cannot get the sup to take it. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you, Frank W. Dagenhardt Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com

RE: MCNS Exam Papers [7:50269]

2002-07-31 Thread Frank Jimenez
, especially when they started popping up on eBay with alarming regularity Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scott Polano Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 8:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc

RE: MCNS Exam Papers [7:50209]

2002-07-30 Thread Frank Jimenez
, consider skipping the third and fourth viewings of Attack of the Clones and go encourage people to produce quality content by becoming a customer Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scott Polano

RE: Content Switch [7:49633]

2002-07-25 Thread Frank Jimenez
is a good place to start Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 2:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Content Switch [7:49633] Hi, Am once

RE: Proper network design? [7:49536]

2002-07-25 Thread Frank H
to talk to our network guy to see if he can make the Linux box do the same job so I can take my Cisco router back home. Thanks to all for your help. Frank Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Frank H wrote: Proper network design? I have a few questions for the group that maybe someone can

RE: Proper network design? [7:49536]

2002-07-24 Thread Frank H
No subinterfaces are used. Here's the Cisco 2514 config: Router#show startup-config Using 940 out of 32762 bytes ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Router ip subnet-zero ! interface Ethernet0 description outside

RE: Proper network design? [7:49536]

2002-07-24 Thread Frank H
Now I understand. I read a few articles on the Cisco site after searching for the term router on a stick and found a good explanation. Thanks for your help. Frank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49558t=49536

Re: Proper network design? [7:49536]

2002-07-24 Thread Frank H
on a stick for 192.168.2.0/24 traffic. It was strange for me at first, but now I get the picture. Frank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49569t=49536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http

RE: flash is read-only [7:49568]

2002-07-24 Thread Frank H
Copied directly from Cisco: On these platforms, the Cisco IOS software image is actually running directly from the Flash memory (flash in read-only mode). Therefore, you cannot copy the Cisco IOS software image from the TFTP server to the Flash if you are in user privileged EXEC mode (router#).

Re: Proper network design? [7:49536]

2002-07-24 Thread Frank H
No, just one IP address on each interface. Check my earlier post for the full configuration. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49578t=49536 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: Proper network design? [7:49536]

2002-07-24 Thread Frank H
The router on a stick effect comes from this: ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.100 All traffic destined to any network not on 192.168.0.0 goes to the gateway (192.168.0.1) on interface ethernet 1. The router then re-routes 192.168.2.0 traffic back on the 192.168.0.0 network to

Re: Boson CCIE tests [7:49121]

2002-07-18 Thread Frank Alvandi
does not mind the public using his tools. Practice test #3 was also good, but the variety was not as good as #1. I had over 100 questions on RIF only . Come on, decyphering two bytes of RIF does not take 100 questions and ansers to practice with. just my 2 cents Frank -Original

RE: CCIE written on resume? [7:48868]

2002-07-16 Thread Frank Jimenez
One thing that I've seen that works well is to list that you are scheduled to take the CCIE lab on xx/xx/. That lets a prospective employer know that you are at least scheduled. Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: callmanager and unity [7:48651]

2002-07-12 Thread Frank Jimenez
It's theoretically possible to install both, but it's not a supported configuration. Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of supernet Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Cat switch 3550 [7:48695]

2002-07-12 Thread Frank Alvandi
Brad is recommending 3550 switch for the ccie lab. what is the difference between a 3548 (or 3524 for that matter) switch and a 3550? Thanks, Frank - Do You Yahoo!? New! SBC Yahoo! Dial - 1st Month Free unlimited access Message Posted at: http

RE: CCIE Power Sessions [7:47966]

2002-07-03 Thread Frank Merrill
Does anyone have a copy of the slides used at the 2002 CCIE power sessions at Networkers? If so, is there a link to it? If not, can I get a copy? In case you missed it in the other thread: http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/presos.html Although I posted this, the way to the

netopia to cisco vpn [7:48011]

2002-07-03 Thread Frank Gesino
Hi- Does anyone know is it is possible to configure a router to router vpn tunnel between a netopia and cisco router? Thanks in advice Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48011t=48011 -- FAQ, list archives,

RE: Strange 6500/IPX Issue!! HELP!! [7:47951]

2002-07-02 Thread Frank Merrill
Did you enable portfast or use the 'host' macro to set the user ports on this switch? I have seen this, but it was in a situation where the user machines had there IPX frame type set to auto. In that case the users machine would boot up, try and autodetect the IPX frame type in use on the

RE: CCIE Power Sessions [7:47966]

2002-07-02 Thread Frank Merrill
Sandra Carr wrote: Does anyone have a copy of the slides used at the 2002 CCIE power sessions at Networkers? If so, is there a link to it? If not, can I get a copy? In case you missed it in the other thread: http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/presos.html Message Posted at:

RE: Unknown Error [7:47822]

2002-07-01 Thread Frank Merrill
I got this message from my Cisco 3662 fastethernet interface , : %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: FastEthernet0/1 transmit error From the System Error Messages guide: Error Message %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: [chars], transmit error Explanation Late collisions have occurred on the Ethernet or Fast

RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]

2002-06-30 Thread Frank Merrill
BTW: I highly recommend attending the PS session (or atleast trying to get your hand on a copy of the PS CCIE book) Unfortunately the company I'm with isn't going to pay for the PS, and so I actually won't be attending, but I grabbed the PDF of the presentation from last years

RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]

2002-06-29 Thread Frank Merrill
Seemed like a much easier exam didn't it? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47771t=47764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

351-001 Beta Written Exam [7:47770]

2002-06-29 Thread Frank Merrill
Where is everyone who mentioned taking the Beta written a while back? Did you all get your pass/fail from Cisco/Prometric yet? I took it, and I realized afterward (duh!) that the test was almost entirely on the new subject material, none of which I did any study for. It makes sense, as why would

Re: WHEN WILL CCIE 350-001 EXPIRE [7:47184]

2002-06-27 Thread Frank Merrill
Steven A. Ridder wrote: I'm at the Networkers CCIE power session as I type, and I heard July. Steve And I was at the beach with my kids (Myrtle Beach,SC) when you were typing that so I'd have to take your word for it, but sounds like it makes sense to me. I'm sure I'll hear the same at

RE: IS-IS in the lab exam [7:47616]

2002-06-27 Thread Frank Jimenez
If it is not excluded on the list, then you should not exclude it in your studies Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Banifaz Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: WHEN WILL CCIE 350-001 EXPIRE [7:47184]

2002-06-22 Thread Frank Merrill
My guess is no later than the middle of August based on previous Cisco Beta-to-production life cycles. However, anything is possible. The Beta test itself ended on May 6, and the results from that are just coming in about now. The Beta was a 'brutal' exam so to speak. The current written is

RE: CCIE Beta results [7:47144]

2002-06-21 Thread Frank Merrill
I did call Prometric a while back, and yes, they did indicate a passing score, but then I asked the CCIE team to verify the validity of that information, and they clearly said that the results had not been fully analyzed, and that the pass/fail cut had not yet been determined. (That was about 2

RE: VLANs and SNMP [7:47104]

2002-06-20 Thread Frank Merrill
Are you mixing apples and oranges here? On one hand you mention determining if VLANs are configured in cisco box. But it would appear that you are looking at trying to determine if there are VLANs existing on the Switch. On the other hand, it would appear that you are querying the MSFC, and

Re: EIGRP Neighbor issue [7:47030]

2002-06-20 Thread Frank Merrill
Kelly Cobean wrote: See what happens when you try to type your configs from memory. You're absolutely right, Chuck, I posted an incorrect config. On the PTP interface the map statement is really a frame-relay interface dlci 103 statement. Still, the proble persists. Kelly, I just

RE: FW: EIGRP Neighbor issue [7:47112]

2002-06-20 Thread Frank Merrill
It's actually still a benefit to you though. When you have an issue like that, and go through 'everything' and then finally figure it out, it sticks with you much better than someone simply handing you the answer on a platter. Good Luck! Message Posted at:

RE: Combining T1's into one pipe [7:46942]

2002-06-18 Thread Frank Merrill
Yes I would use mlppp and ios in the same sentence, as I have been running it without a hitch on a 7200 for 6 months. also, you guys are missing his point (t-1's to the internet) what ISP is going to run OSPF or EIGRP with a customer ? please. I don't see anything in the original post about

RE: confreg [7:46924]

2002-06-18 Thread Frank Merrill
Tim Potier wrote: I understand the bit significance for the 16-bit confreg, but I am confused about the SEQUENCE of the boot and the issue with netboot. Assume confreg 0x2102, what is the correct boot sequence? Where does the flash overide (0x2-0xF) come into play i.e. does it

RE: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-15 Thread Frank Merrill
Giuseppe Citerna wrote: Hi , i have the lab at october, and i dont know what is switch , 5000 or 3550?! It's true that CCIE must knowns every things, but the game must be equal for all, and therefore the ccie candidate must known what is the equipment list. what about?! thanks I don't

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-15 Thread Frank Merrill
Yes, they do want to do it, and will retire the 3524-PWR as soon as they can. Uh if they DO want to do it (have switches with inline power), then why would they want to retire the 3524-PWR?!?!?! ( I know there's the 4000/6000s but I doubt you'll see someone putting a 4000 switch

Re: out of band in band [7:46530]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
Question: Does anyone know why the Americans didn't use the E-1? I have always wondered about this. The T1 was originally developed by ATT in 1957 or 58. It was later adopted by ANSI. The CCITT (Now ITU) standardized the CEPT E1 for most of the world at (I believe) a later date. I'd

Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
It would appear that the changes to the Lab have been clarified and updated, and it looks like the removal of the indicated topics won't actually happen until Nov 4th now: Lab Exam Content and Equipment Changes CCIE Candidates should note the following changes to the technical content and

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
after Nov 4. Good Luck! Frank Merrill wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... It would appear that the changes to the Lab have been clarified and updated, and it looks like the removal of the indicated topics won't actually happen until Nov 4th now:

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
Steven A. Ridder wrote: There's nothing wrong with knowing the IOS based switches just on principal, as one probably installs more of them in a job then the 6500's. The only problem left with the new switches is no in-line power until next year when 802.3af is ratified. -- Right,

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#18 Watch for that wrap! Good Luck! - Original Message - From: Frank Merrill To: Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:43 PM Subject: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623] It would appear that the changes to the Lab have been clarified and updated

Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
Michael L. Williams wrote: Yeah... I don't get this... I know there aren't any 2950s and 3550s that support power, but there's the 3524-PWR-XL-EN switch that does provide inline power. Can't they make up their mind as to whether they want to do it or not?!?!?! Yes, they do want

Re: max routers in a hsrp group [7:46584]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
Michael L. Williams wrote: Here's a good answer for ya =) Convert the 6509s to Native IOS, then just run HSRP between the two active MSFCs done! You don't have to convert to do that. I'm doing that right now between to 6509s with two Sups and two MSFC2s per box. With this each

RE: 3COM XRN Switch Vs CAT6500 ( or CAT4000) [7:46581]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
We are in the process of upgrading our Network infrastructure, which has CISCO routers and CAT5500 switches. During our preliminary evaluation, we are considering also 3COM XRN switches instead of CAT6500 or CAT4000. Has anyone experience with 3COM XRN switches? If so please let met know

RE: RIP w/ key-chains [7:46670]

2002-06-14 Thread Frank Merrill
Timothy Ouellette wrote: Okay folks, starting off a late night studying and noticed something weird. Got two boxes connected like so RouterA---RouterB Router B has a bunch of segments off of it. Something weird. Per some of the material I have, the key chain names are supposed to

RE: CCIE BETA results???? ANYONE? [7:46495]

2002-06-13 Thread Frank Merrill
Clark Jason wrote: All, Has anyone received their results from the BETA exam??? I took the exam months ago.no results yetjust wondering if anyone had gotten anything back from cisco yet Well... as it only ran for three weeks total between April 15 and May 6 it's just

RE: free Cisco networker ticket? [7:46387]

2002-06-12 Thread Frank Merrill
supernet wrote: I heard Cisco gave its customers free networker tickets. Is it true? Thanks. Yoshi Well They do if you spend an awful lot of money with them. I mean in the multi-millions. Due to the economy, they aren't giving away as many freebies as I would have liked to see this

RE: CCIE home lab [7:46395]

2002-06-12 Thread Frank Merrill
Hunt Lee wrote: 1 x Cat 5000 I'm thinking whether I should get the below:- 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token?? I really don't know what else I need... If you are going to be doing that LAB after Oct 1, then heed the news that Cisco has posted

Re: vpns [7:46259]

2002-06-11 Thread Frank Hafta
Wayne Jang wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Do you have a CCO login, there are some good sample configs if you dig into the stuff there. Let me know if you can't find them. GEORGE wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Im looking for

Re: Training Documents? [7:46298]

2002-06-11 Thread Frank Merrill
Clayton Dukes wrote: P.S. The website does require a login, but it's free (I just like to know who's playing on my server :-)) As an aside, your web site does nothing for me so to speak. I registered, and never received an email giving me a password. If I select 'Forgot Password' and ask

RE: Parity errors and Cosmic radiation! [7:46282]

2002-06-11 Thread Frank Merrill
I read the link referenced at the bottom of the page and it was quite interesting. If you missed it, here it is again: http://www.eetimes.com/news/98/1012news/ibm.html After reading that, I guess you'll be digging a hole to put the router in! ;-) Good Luck! Message Posted at:

RE: BGP MED Question [7:46321]

2002-06-11 Thread Frank Merrill
Sounds as if it's getting to the 'first path received when multiple paths are the same' part of the multiple path selection process. IS the path from R1 the first received? If so, have the one from R3 come up first and see if it then selects that one. If so, then that is the case. If so, then

RE: Amazing!! Passed the beta [7:45920]

2002-06-07 Thread Frank Merrill
Unfortunately, based on the fact that everyone (including myself) that has called has been told that they passed, and also based on the fact that they apparently put P's into the pass/fail field when the scoring isn't automatic (Since it's a Beta, cisco scores it manually), I'm not as excited as

RE: 640-605 BCRAN Beta PASSED!! [7:45777]

2002-06-04 Thread Frank Merrill
I was wondering if anyone could tell me if this will count toward the existing CCNP track if my other exams are the current standard (640-50x) in which case I'M DONE!!! Betas do indeed count, and if so, then you should be able to log into the tracking syustem and see that you are indeed

RE: trying to test ISDN [7:45786]

2002-06-04 Thread Frank Merrill
BRI0: Dialing cause ip (s=10.3.101.13, d=224.0.0.10) BRI0: Already 255 call(s) in progress on BRI0, dialing not allowed I have never seen this msg before. Anyone know what this means? Is there a loop somewhere? I would guess that you have EIGRP running seeing as that is the multicast

RE: Free CCIE Practice Lab From CyscoExpert [7:45445]

2002-05-30 Thread Frank Merrill
I just wanted to mention how funny I thought the Sample Lab was. It's not the lab itself, but the comment that the equipment requirement will be 'light'. It's amazing to me that you consider 7 routers to be a 'light' requirement as many with home labs don't have more than 5 or 6 since you really

RE: What next? [7:45176]

2002-05-28 Thread Frank Merrill
What next? How about Disney World? Sorry, the question just reminded me of those corny events where the winners announce such ;-) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45306t=45176 -- FAQ, list archives, and

RE: how to set duplex and speed on 2500 router int ??? [7:45238]

2002-05-28 Thread Frank Merrill
Question1: May I know how to set the speed and duplex type of the interface ethernet0 of 2500 router. See below.. there is no speed and duplex option unlike IOS switch fasthernet switch. That interface is a 10Mbs/Half-Duplex interface. You can't set it to anything else. The speed and

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >