I'm curious if anyone here uses or has used the Orion network monitoring
software from Solarwinds. We currently use Network Node Manager but since we
use it primarily for fault reporting and statistics gathering I'm toying
with the idea of using a product more tailored to our needs.
If you've
If you have flow control turned on, turn it off. What are your other
terminal settings? For the 2500 series I believe you should be set to 9600,
8-bit, No parity, 1 stop bit. Some Cisco devices request that you use two
stop bits so you might try that as well, but my guess is that it's a flow
Steven Aiello 9/9/03 11:18:51 AM
Any one know of a good network monitor prog.? It doesn't have to be
free but not to expensive. My budget is nill. Any recomendations?
Thanks,
Steve
Wouldn't it _have_ to be free if your budget is nil? ;-) You might want to
check out MRTG and WhatsUp Gold:
The key is that you must completely unlearn classful thinking. Forget that
you ever learned it. Completely ignore any prior classful subnet boundaries
that you were forced to memorize. It's all just one big IP address space
that you choose to carve up any way you like. As long as you do it
I'm not very familiar with the 1721 routers and while I'm researching them I
wanted to get some opinions. Isn't the 1721 really just a baby 2600 with a
slighly smaller processor and no network module slot? Are there any other
significant differences between them?
We've been using 2600, and later
Perhaps a config would be helpful. Or do you expect us to use our psychic
abilities to determine the problem? ;-)
JMC Nel 9/3/03 12:29:06 PM
Could someone please assist me? I set up a customer to received the Partial
TABLE but for some reason the customer is receiving the Full Table. I
John Neiberger 9/3/03 1:09:32 PM
I'm not very familiar with the 1721 routers and while I'm researching them
I
wanted to get some opinions. Isn't the 1721 really just a baby 2600 with a
slighly smaller processor and no network module slot? Are there any other
significant differences between them
Sleek 8/18/03 2:33:01 PM
Hi all,
I would like to know if it is possible to upgrade a 2500 series router to
a
2600 series router and if it is possible I would also want to know the
required materials for upgrade.
Regards,
Osaz. CCNA
No, this is not possible. They are entirely different
an always up/up interface.
That's pretty simple.
John Neiberger wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exactly right. Sometimes it's nice to have a virtual interface whose
status
is not tied directly to a physical interface. We've mentioned several
configurations where this is the case. From
Hmm...that's interesting. I found Halabit to be very easy to understand, but
that was after reading Stewart. Stewart's book is incredibly easy to
understand, especially considering how short it is. Quite concise, yet
readable.
I have Doyle Vol. II but I stopped studying for attempt #2 before I
Joseph R. Taylor 8/8/03 1:53:53 PM
Team,
Are WIC-1T interfaces to be used between locations only useful when
hooked up to an external CSU/DSU? If so what technology is the local loop?
Thank you,
JoeT MCSE, CCNP
A CSU/DSU is a
There are two separate issues here. The first is the software licensing, and
I'd agree with you that if you own the router *and* have a valid license for
the software then you should be able to sell the router along with the
software license to whomever you please. Cisco feels differently and if
And I don't mean the Starship Enterprise. :-) I'm pretty sure they do use
IPng, though.
Seriously, regarding IPv6. Who's currently migrating to it? Any enterprise
networks that aren't providers of some sort?
I'm going to assume that at some unknown point in the future IPv6 will
finally push
Fred,
You've been bitten by the URL in the first line problem. If the first line
in a post is a URL it sometimes gets munged. It's helpful to add some
padding at the beginning to get the URL off of the first line.
John
Reimer, Fred 8/5/03 12:23:39 PM
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys
juniper 8/5/03 8:32:50 AM
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a good book for the BGP exam
Mark
My two personal favorite BGP books are:
Internet Routing Architectures, 2nd Edition, by Halabi
BGP4: Interdomain Routing in the Internet, by Stewart
If you have a subscription to CertificationZone, Howard
Wallis Short 8/7/03 9:08:01 AM
Hi Oliver
Many thanks for your reply. Just to clarify, I am using the Octal cable to
connect to the console of the switch. Are you saying I should connect a
crossover cable to the end of the octal cable and then connect the cross
over into the console port of the
Exactly right. Sometimes it's nice to have a virtual interface whose status
is not tied directly to a physical interface. We've mentioned several
configurations where this is the case. From the routers perspective it may
have a couple of special properties, since it's virtual, but it's still just
David Vital 8/1/03 8:04:21 AM
I have to ask what you are basing that statement on. I'm not trying to
dispute you, just to gain moe information. I have never seen anything
that
would indicate a change in Duplex when set to 100 full on each end. Are
you
suggesting that 100/half is the way to go
John Neiberger 7/31/03 5:02:31 PM
Here's an interesting troubleshooting issue for you to chew on. There is a
fairly simple solution that may or may not be obvious at first. Heck, I
might have missed an even simpler solution. This is for the
beginner-to-intermediate level people. All you advanced
You have a device that is reachable only via telnet or console that you've
preconfigured with an IP address, subnet mask, and default gateway and
subsequently shipped out to a remote location to be installed. Once the
device was in place you realized that you've configured it with the wrong
[This isn't the usual type of follies question where you have to figure
something out. In this case, you either know the answer or you don't. If you
don't, you can probably figure out how to look it up and it would be good
information to have in case you see this in your own network.]
Your
the right topology Mobile IP?? Just a
guess! Need to take the edge off before my first lab attempt on Monday!!
Thanks for keeping us thinking!
Jason
John Neiberger wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have a device that is reachable only via telnet or console that
you've
preconfigured with an IP
Possibly, but you have to give more detail to win the prize. :-)
[Notice: there is no prize associated with this question. ]
Jason Viera 8/1/03 2:22:32 PM
Bill Gates leaving his mark on your network??
Jason
[This isn't the usual type of follies question where you have to figure
to which this device is connected, and from that router, connect
(telnet or ssh) to that device, fix the ip, (get disconnected in process,
of
course), and remove the incorret secondary from the router...voila and
other
French words I don't understand.
John Neiberger wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
Daniel Cotts 8/1/03 3:16:24 PM
pad
pad
pad
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3330.txt
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Friday Follies #2 [7:73371]
[This isn't the usual type
: Friday Follies #1 [7:73370]
Depending upon the topology you may be able to use Local Area Mobility,
and
this is a stretch unless you have the right topology Mobile IP?? Just a
guess! Need to take the edge off before my first lab attempt on Monday!!
Thanks for keeping us thinking!
Jason
John
-to-point one.
Thanks,
Zsombor
John Neiberger wrote:
Jason gave the answer I was looking for: Local Area Mobility.
On the interface to which the device is connected add the
following two
lines:
ip proxy-arp
ip mobile arp
Then add:
ip route a.b.c.d 255.255.255.255
You have a lot of options. I recommend Sprint first, then Level-3,
then GX. Unless you are already in bed with Qwest or ATT, they
won't give you the time-of-day for support (and you are going to
need good support for an offering like this). In particular, I
recommend Sprint's PW option (UTI on
John Neiberger 7/31/03 10:36:14 AM
You have a lot of options. I recommend Sprint first, then Level-3,
then GX. Unless you are already in bed with Qwest or ATT, they
won't give you the time-of-day for support (and you are going to
need good support for an offering like this). In particular, I
Joseph Brunner 7/30/03 5:24:39 PM
www.netscaler.com
their box does compression, and it has so many dos prevention and
other killer things it blows away the competition. We went with it
based on the performance it had during a syn flood blizard, and their
ssl vpn rocks!
That's one of the units
Joseph Brunner 7/31/03 4:10:58 PM
I am running compression based ssl vpn for extranet. this allows
without a client 8 to 1 or so compression ratio for mostly spreadsheets
sent
over port 80.
also the box is managed by ssh.. what do you mean by telnet ?
most protocols such as ldap, exchange,
Here's an interesting troubleshooting issue for you to chew on. There is a
fairly simple solution that may or may not be obvious at first. Heck, I
might have missed an even simpler solution. This is for the
beginner-to-intermediate level people. All you advanced people please
refrain from giving
Loopbacks are handy for use with ip unnumbered. If you have a multipoint
interface using subinterfaces you could give every subinterface the same
address and keep everything on the same subnet.
They're also handy for DNS. If your router hostname resolves to its loopback
address you'll be able to
We've researched a couple of SSL VPN products like the Neoteris box, for
example, and we're starting to look into a few others. We're looking for
something to allow secure remote access to select internal applications.
Support for telnet, SSH, and TN3270 is required, and we prefer clientless
As some of you can tell I'm on a VPN-related kick lately. Sorry.
I just finished reading an interview with Luca Martini and that got me
interested in finding out more about L2 VPNs. I'm already getting fairly
familiar with RFC 2764-style L3 VPNs, particularly Qwest's PRN offering.
After
Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter 7/30/03
4:36:57 PM
Reimer, Fred wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of those routers are EOL'd. They can't support them forever
(although
the non-XM 2600's surely didn't last too long)...
well, this is one way to solve the problem of CCIE glut -
John Neiberger wrote in message ...
bulk of their traffic. When considering a move to VoIP or expanded
video conferencing this can create some traffic shaping issues.
For VoIP, you want to consider a control/data plane that makes this
traffic forwarding optimal...the topology is of less
Mike,
I'd try replacing the cable first if you have one available. Even if the DS3
isn't configured correctly your interface should be up if you're router is
speaking to your IDSU. I'd also try resetting the IDSU to its defaults just
to make sure something in the config on the IDSU isn't breaking
By the way, FORTEZZA is used for more that sensitive but unclassified
traffic. That's just one application. What you're probably looking for
is
a product that falls in the NSA Type 2 category. We can discuss more
offline if you want to...
Out of curiosity, what is currently used for classified
It appears that Cisco is updating the CCIP track and removing multicast from
the requirements. Is that really the case, and if so, why? As far as I know
multicast is still in the CCNP track and it's got to be on the CCIE written
and lab, so why remove such an important topic from CCIP? I suppose
Continuing our ongoing discussions of autonegotiation and the behavior of
newer switches I thought I'd forward the following link:
http://www.psiber.com/lm25ap01.htm
The introduction on that page does an excellent job of explaining some of
the problems we've been running into. I take issue with
I've been researching different types of service provider VPNs in general
and Qwest's PRN, in particular. From what I can gather their PRN is a
2764-based VPN offering using IPSec tunneling. I've run into two fairly
obvious caveats already and I'm wondering what other caveats might await
that
Also worth looking at is the hardware component: what will run on
the hardware you've already got (if anything)? IF you already
have most or all of the hardware pieces to implement Cisco's
version, then Cisco's probably makes sense. IF you already have
the requisite Nortel gear (Passports?),
Here you go:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/atip
x_c/ipx/2cdipx.htm
HTH,
John
J B 7/28/03 11:35:43 AM
I'm not really familiar with IPX and I have to connect 3 remote branches to
a central site where the Novell server is located.
Can anybody point me
Howard C. Berkowitz 7/28/03 11:37:44 AM
Does anyone know if there's a FORTEZZA encryption product available,
presumably third-party, for Cisco routers? It's a NSA-approved
chipset, usually on PC card, for government sensitive but
unclassified traffic. CCO search doesn't give any hits.
My
Those are great! But I think a few of them need to be translated for us
Americans. ;-)
Mark E. Hayes 7/25/03 7:43:02 AM
Thank you, I needed that!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dom
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 5:53 AM
To: [EMAIL
I'm just now digging deeper into current VPN technologies since I'm
researching Qwest's PRN service. I'm awaiting a definitive answer from them
but it appears that their PRN service is 2764-based, which apparently means
it does not use MPLS like 2547-based VPNs. I'm curious about the
implications
to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Neiberger wrote:
Stevo 7/23/03 12:02:28 PM
Hey All,
I have a Cat 4006 running in native mode (running IOS 12.1(13) and can
not
ping or telnet to it anymore. It is passing traffic just fine however
the
only way I can connect to it is to ping
Not to mention hazard pay.
John
Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter 7/24/03
11:01:50 AM
according to my source, this actually translates to appx 5500 USD. also -
you don't know the entire package - living expenses, housing etc
http://www.xe.com/ucc/convert.cgi
Walker, James - Is wrote in
Tim Champion wrote:
Could someone please confirm the following to be true (taken
from CCO):
Per-destination load balancing allows the router to distribute
packets
based on the destination address, and uses multiple paths to
achieve load
sharing. Packets for a given source-destination
If there are multiple levels of Heaven and our final destination has been
predetermined in order to equalize the number of people in each level, would
this be considered pre-destination load-balancing?
Priscilla Oppenheimer 7/24/03 1:24:34 PM
Packets for a given source-destination pair are a
Fred,
A few years ago this list was opened up to questions and discussions that
aren't necessarily related to certification. In fact, discussions don't even
have to be Cisco-related, although they usually are. You'll quite often see
stuff like this around here, and many times people simply want
Yep, I would agree with Fred unless I tested it thoroughly. This may be one
of those situations where it might seem to work but I wouldn't trust it in
production. If it's simply an intellectual exercise it would be interesting
to mock it up and see what happens when user traffic actually starts to
Ants 7/23/03 8:27:03 AM
Hi,
Have a couple of ws-c2950 and ws-c2912xl switches running IOS 12.0(5.3)WC1
version.
Recent Cisco vulnarabilty recommends upgrade but for this version it
recommends 12.0T or 12.1
What version will be best suited for upgrading these swicthes?
anyone knows whether
All those who consider any version of this platform beware. As far as I can
tell there are no reliable software versions for this switch that do not
suffer from connectivity bugs. We thought 12.1(13)EA1b solved our problems
so we started rolling out this version. Upon reloading we have a number of
Stevo 7/23/03 12:02:28 PM
Hey All,
I have a Cat 4006 running in native mode (running IOS 12.1(13) and can not
ping or telnet to it anymore. It is passing traffic just fine however the
only way I can connect to it is to ping it
I'm confused. Can you ping it or not? :-)
Message Posted at:
are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst 2950
to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst 2950: The Spawn of the Devil
where's the switch and what are your passwords, John? if it's close enough,
I'll be happy to help you out ;-
John Neiberger wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ants 7/23/03 8:27:03 AM
Hi,
Have a couple of ws-c2950 and ws-c2912xl switches running IOS
12.0(5.3)WC1
version.
Recent Cisco
think of. ;-
John Neiberger wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All those who consider any version of this platform beware. As far as I
can
tell there are no reliable software versions for this switch that do not
suffer from connectivity bugs. We thought 12.1(13)EA1b solved our
problems
so
the author by replying to this message. If you are not the
named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Ricardo J Castaneda 7/22/03 12:18:17 PM
Hello,
A question barely came up to mind: Would it be possible to join a
broadcast domain, not by means of a LAN switch but from one remote router
to
another, using GRE Tunnels?
Since I haven't done it before, I kind of thought that it'll be possible.
This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of you
noticed that by far the most problematic port on the Catalyst 2950 switches
is port 13?
I'd bet money that at least 20% of the time we have a problem with a device
connected to these switches they're connected to port 13. Just
Howard C. Berkowitz 7/22/03 3:59:01 PM
Don't forget relevant folk:
Pete Seeger: This LAN is Your LAN
Kingston Trio: MTA (triple duty for email, token management, and
looping)
Peter Paul Mary: If I had a token, I'd ring it in the morning
And surely there must be a version of Alice's
Are any of you using Qwest PRN? If so, I have a few questions for you:
1. How do you like it so far?
2. Did you migrate from something else? If so, how did the migration go?
3. Any 'gotchas' that you learned later that you wish you'd learned sooner?
4. How does the service compare to what you
because it was
considered a default command! Each time the router booted CDP was
disabled again!
I recommend to everyone that ODR not be used in a Cisco production
environment. You never know when an IOS (platform?) bug will render your
WAN unusable!
- Tom
John Neiberger wrote:
I've never
Peter van Oene wrote:
At 04:31 PM 7/21/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
Are any of you using Qwest PRN? If so, I have a few questions
for you:
1. How do you like it so far?
2. Did you migrate from something else? If so, how did the
migration go?
3. Any 'gotchas' that you learned later
Peter van Oene wrote:
At 04:31 PM 7/21/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
Are any of you using Qwest PRN? If so, I have a few questions
for you:
1. How do you like it so far?
2. Did you migrate from something else? If so, how did the
migration go?
3. Any 'gotchas' that you learned later
happened to the MPLS network they were trying to sell
you
a while back? what advantage does PRN have vis a vis MPLS such that Quest
is
no longer trying to convince you to buy it?
inquiring minds need to know :-
John Neiberger wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter van Oene wrote:
At 04:31
Peter van Oene 7/21/03 3:26:30 PM
Oops. Accidentally hit post before adding any content. ;-)
Yes, it stands for Private Routed Network. It's a very interesting
solution.
Our hub sites would participate in OSPF with their network, while our
spoke
sites would use static routing. The PRN would
Oh man... Now Fred *and* Pete are on this list? What is happening to this
place?? :-)
It's good to see both of you here.
John
Peter Benac 7/18/03 6:20:47 AM
I am glad you are not representative of the current Cisco Culture.
Your attitude in this matter really is not acceptable and I would
Firesox 7/18/03 6:03:15 AM
Folks,
I am troubleshooting the 3524XL and get the following message at the boot.
C3500XL POST FAILURE: front-end post: GigabitEthernet0/2:
C3500XL POST FAILURE: looped-back packet not received
It is connected to 2950G-24. 2950 is seeing the 3524XL via CDP, but not
I thought I'd share an embarrassing moment from yesterday in hopes that
others will learn from my mistake.
I have a router on the outside of a firewall that needed to be upgraded
after the advisory yesterday. In order to reach the TFTP server I needed to
add a static translation in the PIX. No
Zsombor Papp 7/18/03 8:40:09 AM
Perhaps you slightly misunderstood my attitude and are jumping to
conclusions so that you can put a convenient label on me.
From my vantage point this does seem to be a misunderstanding among those
involved. I don't think people were trying to label you, per
I accidentally deleted the posting about this but I wanted to make a point.
It's been said that a static route has an AD of 1 unless it points directly
out an interface, in which case it has an AD of 0. Sasa just mentioned that
this has been discussed in the past and is a myth. However, I'd like
John Neiberger 7/17/03 12:12:42 PM
I accidentally deleted the posting about this but I wanted to make a
point.
It's been said that a static route has an AD of 1 unless it points
directly
out an interface, in which case it has an AD of 0. Sasa just mentioned
that
this has been discussed
I ran into this problem a couple of days ago and I'm interested if anyone
else has experienced something similar. I opened up my email client at home
the other day and noticed that it was continually downloading the same
messages over and over again. It would get to the same message each time and
We have a Windows server connected to a 6513 at 100/Full that does nightly
backups (about 20GB) to a Solaris server connected to the same switch via
gigabit ethernet. Prior to a recent upgrade the Windows server could upload
approximately 5MBytes/s to the Solaris server. The Solaris server was
the
final period (.) was no longer on a new line. The code was fixed to add
the CR after the message is converted to HTML or RTF. This ensures that
the final period (.) is on a new line.
Vijay Ramcharan, MCSE, CCNP/DP
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
it from the other side.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 8:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: do you know why? [7:72352]
I'm not very familiar with the newer releases of PIX software, but do you
have to enable ICMP
The sixth module is on routing protocols. Top-Down Network Design would
meet
your needs there with a couple exceptions. The new course covers IS-IS and
On Demand Routing (ODR). (Does anyone really use ODR, I wonder??)
I've never heard of anyone using ODR. Anyone here know of anyone using ODR
in
Did you download the transition software? :-) Other than this odd problem
I haven't had any issues since the transition. I wasn't impressed with the
amount of time I spent waiting for support, though.
John
annlee 7/16/03 3:38:55 PM
begin vent--
I am having continuing problems with comcast --
Zsombor Papp 7/16/03 3:42:18 PM
I looked at that page in Doyle's book and I thought it's just a simple
mistake, or maybe IOS changed since he wrote that, but after reading
this:
Handling of default routes varies from protocol to protocol. RIP, IGRP,
EIGRP and BGP automatically redistribute
Dave C. 7/15/03 2:12:09 PM
I work for a small growing business and am currently evaluating two types
of
network analyzer software. EtherPeek NX and Sniffer Portable (Sniffer
Pro).
Since the versions that I have are not the full production versions (only
for evalutation purposes), I am limited
I'm not very familiar with the newer releases of PIX software, but do you
have to enable ICMP on those interfaces? It looks to me like you only have
ICMP allowed going one direction. This is a very common problem and easily
fixed. Also, if something is being blocked it should be apparent from the
Original Message -
From: dre
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: Network Analyzers [7:72346]
Dave C. wrote in message ...
I know there is an extensive difference in price (Etherpeek NX is
somewhere
around $2000-2500 range, and Sniffer Portable (Pro) is
Heck, for that much can't you just get a T-1 into your house?? ;-) If you
can keep all your kids away from the servers that would be a great solution!
John
Paul Borghese 7/14/03 1:30:18 PM
Hi Elijah,
We actually have two of the GroupStudy servers at RackShack. Great product
if you do not
Wait a second...isn't that a modifed version of the first Friday Funnies
that you posted??
Dom, did you start hitting the sauce a bit early? ;-)
John
Dom 7/3/03 5:40:23 AM
Here is an early Friday Funny as I will be sulking tomorrow as we lost
part of our Great British Empire on that date ;)
Lookup People, use of illudium, in
either
a peaceful or dastardly fasion, is punishable by Death Ray.
Ming The Merciless
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 3:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Quoting in Replies
- jvd 7/1/03 12:32:02 PM
Hi my Quote button disappeared! No serious, there used to be a quote
button
next to my Post button but now it's gone. I refreshed the page as well and
still nothing. Maybe the cosmic rays hit my PC's memory, corrupted it and
deleted my Quote button :-)
No serious, is
15:29, Jamie Johnson wrote:
Cool! My cosmic ray machine must be working. Better put on your
tinfoil
hats.
From: Recent escapee from the ex-dot.commer insane asylum
John Neiberger wrote:
- jvd 7/1/03 12:32:02 PM
Hi my Quote button disappeared! No serious, there used
Shane Stockman 6/26/03 8:04:01 AM
I have a 2522 and a 1720.I want to setup the 2522 so that it will dial via
a
serial port using a modem that is attached.I have a DB60 to DB25 DTE cable
for that.The router must dial the AUX port on the 1720 for use in out of
band management.The 2522 does not
Okay, this is getting really old, really fast. When responding to a post,
PLEASE QUOTE WHAT YOU'RE REPLYING TO! The number of unintelligible posts is
increasing and some simple quoting would help immensely.
Perhaps the issue is that if you use the web-based board to post a quote
does not happen
already think I bi*ch too much about other things! :-)
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Quoting in Replies [7:71366]
Okay, this is getting really old, really fast. When
yasmin ashraf 6/24/03 6:00:35 AM
Dear Sir,
I need some help. Actually I am trying to configure
BRI. When I type command Sh ISDN status then it
shows BRI Layer 1 is deactivated. But whereas NTBA box
shows both lights (Line, Voltage) as Ok. Following is
my cable configuration from S/T interface
That is true, but to be legal Jamie must also purchase the Enterprise
feature set for both routers. And, just so you all know, I know for a fact
that Cisco is monitoring CCO downloads and making sure you actually have
service contracts and licenses for the software you're downloading. Don't
Curious 6/24/03 10:25:25 AM
Hello,
I know that is a bad idea to configure a port with portfast when this
port
connect with other switch (loops can be created), but the question is:
could
I put a port connected to a router in portfast mode? A router is a layer 3
device not a layer 2, so I think
Aaron Ajello 6/24/03 11:41:41 AM
This is probably a very simple concept question, but I've asked a couple
people and haven't gotten a solid answer.
If I've got two frame relay spoke sites connected point to point with a
hub
site and a server in one spoke site copies a file to a server in the
I'm concerned about the output errors. Collisions are not considered output
errors; they're to be expected with half duplex ethernet. So, you do really
have a problem of some variety that needs to be investigated.
I'm not familiar with the bridge you're referring to. Are you positive that
it
1 - 100 of 1607 matches
Mail list logo
