Interface
wg3r3#
If I debug ip ospf hello I can see that wg3r2 is recieving hello's, but
wg3r3 doesn't see any from wg3r2, weird or what ? I've checked for bugs in
the bug-tracker, but none matches it...
Greetings, Peter
richard beddow wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL P
!)
Greetings, Peter
wg3r2#show ip pim nei
PIM Neighbor Table
Neighbor InterfaceUptime/ExpiresVer DR
AddressPrio/Mode
10.3.2.33 FastEthernet001:44:14/00:01:35 v21 / B S
wg3r3#show ip
to IOS-versions, wg3r1 is running v12.1(9), wg3r2 is running
v12.2(5) (no T-releases here!)
Why should PIM kill OSPF ? Anybody got any clues? You can see some captures
of the configs below!
Thanx ahead!
/Peter
wg3r1#show ip ospf nei
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address
in all 3
resources and feel that they complement each other rather than compete.
Peter
In article , Elijah Savage
writes
Does anyone have any comments on this book not many reviews on Amazon. A
guy at work said this thing was so full of mistakes that he got so angry
and took it out to the gun
slides. I'll try
to dig out the reference.
Try a CCO search on ATOM / looking at the MPLS ATM pages.
There is a mention of it in:
Service Provider QoS, Providing e2e Guarantees by Vijay Krishnamoorthy
(Cisco IOS Technologies Div April 2001) I'll try to find a URL for the
article.
Peter
In article
a question: we have 2 sdsl connections (1.5 and 1 mbps) from 2 different
isp providers. right now, we use one as a back up and connect it manually
if need be. we will be using a cisco 2621 router with 3 ethernet ports, one
for each of the dsl routers and one to the firewall. what would be the
to come on in the future. In any case it is probably useful at
least to have had a look at it.
Peter
In article , Stephen Neville
writes
Hi group
Iam currently studying for the BSCN, i am using the sybex study guide. My
question is i have gone through the book and cant see any sections
to down load from cco it has the variants. Take a look at
the 12.1 to see what I mean then look at 12.2 and check the release
notes.
Peter
In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
Peter,
Looking at the feature navigator, we can see that the image
mc3810-is-mz.12.2-4.T1 supports VoIP.
May be the v5
when you do a 'wr erase' to clear
out the configs as it will no longer know its ip address and you will
end up running the flash IOS.
Peter
In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
Peter,
Thank you for replying. Great info that the IOS image should contain
v5 feature set. ;-))
The box
Hugo,
If you are after some e.g. configs take a look at my earlier post in the
GroupStudy ccielab archives. Posting 200111/msg01481.
Peter
article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
Peter,
Thank you for replying. Great info that the IOS image should contain
v5 feature set. ;-))
The box is an MC
if you don't have SMARTNET on the routers.
Peter
In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
Just to confirm. Can a MC-3810 do VoIP or only VoFR?
Thanks,
Hugo
html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Peter Whittle
Message Posted at:
http
through, eventually,
no matter how crummy the analogue link is!'
Not being of IBM extraction I am not in a position to comment on SDLC or
Bisync.
I hope that this helps
Peter
--
Peter Whittle
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27659t=27568
the same sort of facilities.
I think that you will find the question of 3900 vs 3920 pretty much
academic as if you can program one of them then you can program the
other and as far as postings on CCO go Cisco have stated that there is
no longer any cabling to be done by the candidates.
Peter
What version IOS do you have?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27017t=27006
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
I don't know of any free ones. But routersim is ok.
Check ebay. You can get a decent router for a fair price.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27018t=26886
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
)
If you want to get the time and date set on the smaller routers at start
up then you will need to configure NTP. You could use a 4500M etc as the
source, get an NTP program for a PC, or use one of the master NTP
sources on the Internet.
Peter
.
In article , hk
writes
Dear group
Psl show me Why
The file is slightly over 3 Megs in size
for the Sup I engine with 5.5(11)
Sup III with 5.5.(10) is slightly under 5 Megs
If you did a format bootflash and then tftp the new image on the flash you
should not have to use set boot system flash at all.
Message Posted at:
try to find four 4 Meg pieces with 30 pin for the DRAM to
bump it up to 16 Megs, the maximum anyways
And older 486(?) might do
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26558t=25745
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
Does anyone know a way to get past the Username: after using the
no passord utility on a PIX 515 it claims to erase the config.
I have now tried every np*.bin on Cisco's page...
this is really getting painfull.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26562t=26562
I also read the BCMSN Ciscopress book and the ExamCram book. I've worked
with 2900xl,3500xl, and 5500 switches.
I like reading two books one technical and the other less technical book. I
also like using the cramsession study guides as a final quick read before
the test.
2 books + as much
JAmes,
The RII bit is the first bit in the first byte of the source mac address and
signifies whether a RIF is present. It is NOT contained in the RIF and
indeed by definition cannot be.
-Original Message-
From: Pieter Jordaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 October 2001 11:22
To:
+ NM-1V + VIC, even less than an NP-1A. (you
also get 2 x UIO serial, 10Bt)
Many Thanks,
Peter
--
Peter Whittle
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23594t=23594
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
Hello all,
I have a date for the CCIE lab (February 18, 2002 at Brussels) which i would
like to move to the end of October 2001.
If interested please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take care,
Pan
_
Get your FREE download of MSN
When the DR fails, the BDR takes over as soon as it ages out the its dead
timer for the DR. The BDR already has adjacencies with all other routers on
the segment and has been keeping tabs on the DR such that it can take over
rather gracefully. A BDR election is then subsequently held to
Integrated ISIS does not use CLNS outside of sharing some packet
structures. It remains a valid exam topic.
Peter
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 10/1/2001 at 8:12 AM Cisco Lover wrote:
Hey guys..
By considering the fact that CLNS is no more a part of RS Lab sylabus,how
far
Cisco fully supports ISO CLNS however, ISO CLNS has been removed from the
protocols tested on the CCIE Lab. Integrated ISIS is not dependant on CLNS
and thus remains a valid exam topic.
Pete
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 10/1/2001 at 11:03 AM MADMAN wrote:
As far as I know
there were some interdependancies.
Dave
Peter Van Oene wrote:
Cisco fully supports ISO CLNS however, ISO CLNS has been removed from the
protocols tested on the CCIE Lab. Integrated ISIS is not dependant on
CLNS
and thus remains a valid exam topic.
Pete
*** REPLY SEPARATOR
Trick question? How about none, as OSPF routers do not exchange routing
tables.
In this scenario, the edge ospf routers will act as normal and advertise
within their type 1 LSA the link to the segment which happens to contain the
HSRP functionality. OSPF itself will have no knowledge of HSRP,
Here is one of hundreds of links I got when i entered tcp push bit on
google.com
http://www.daemon.org/tcp.html
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 9/19/2001 at 10:34 AM Mr. Laughs wrote:
I need help finding out what the TCP Push bit is. Would you please help
me
with a source?
Thank
I think the key here is that you have to NAT into each provider separately.
This really only requires some intelligence internal to the network such
that you can choose an outbound route towards an active ISP/link. This
works well for outbound only and in reality, choosing outbound paths based
Anyone has the experience of having SAP running on their network ?
What is the actual bandwidth requirement per active SAP user ?
On CCO, there is a formula provided by Cisco :
SAP bandwidth requirement = 16000 * Number of active SAP users / (dialog
think time + response time) bit/sec
So far as the multiaccess segment is concerned, when you remove the DR from
the segment, the DR is down. The only way a DR can do its job is if it has
access to the segment in question. In this case, promoting the BDR makes
sense since the BDR is the only other router on the segment which has
I've not worked much with TDP, but could you possibly have a problem where
the LSP nexthop advertised by TDP does not match the BGP nexthop likely due
to use or lackthereof of next_hop_self?
Pete
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 9/17/2001 at 3:46 AM Vijendra Jaiswal wrote:
Hello
-
From: Peter Van Oene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Need clarification on BDR promotion to DR [7:20163]
So far as the multiaccess segment is concerned, when you remove the DR from
the segment, the DR is down
I would say that depends on what they ask you to do. I assume you know how
to do both?
Peter
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 9/14/2001 at 7:06 AM Cisco Lover wrote:
ARe we allowed to put IP ospf point to point command on loopback
interfaces
in order to get their actual mask
The block is 136-144 in the /21 range so you'd be right, though you'd also
be summarizing other addresses which you do not explicitly have connectivity
to.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 9/14/2001 at 12:19 PM The New Guy wrote:
A buddy and I are currently preparing for the BSCN
What are your BGP neighbor relationships showing? What do you see when you
issue a show ip bgp? or a show ip bgp sum?
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 9/12/2001 at 10:11 PM Cisco Nuts wrote:
Hello,
I have configured 3 routers with BGP.RTA and RTB are in AS100...RTC on
AS300
depends on whos doing it.
I can do that in like, a day or two. for most that could be a week long
project.
i speak from experience.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Julius Bingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VoIP [7
-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:46 PM
To: 'Patrick Donlon'
Subject: RE: H323/VoIP info [7:18451]
but what about the RTP streams? the pix has always been able to do h323
filtering / fixup protocol for the h323 stuff. i've never gotten voip to
work
load (tiny/featureless) ios via tftp, so u can erase flash, or, set the
thing on fire.
-Original Message-
From: ietobe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to upgrade ios on 2502 [7:18449]
Hi,
does anybody know how
want it for.
contact me via email if interested
-Peter Slow
-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: $10 Vitual CCIE/CCNP LAB NOW AVAILABLE [7:17490]
They also say that they have
of the world!
They are designed for small branch office use in Germany where ISDN is
very common. There are several other manufacturers of similar products.
Further details from:
http://www.ackermann.co.uk
I hope this saves you some money!
Peter
In article , Dan Faulk
writes
One way to save a good
Cisco Press is just another publisher and in my opinion indicates no more or
less valuable text than any other publisher.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/23/2001 at 6:10 AM Munzir Khan wrote:
Cisco Press is always the best bacause it is more specific what you see in
the real
You could really search the archives for this as its been answered a bunch
of times. Anyway, here's the short story.
A bunch of years ago, it was possible, due to smaller internet routing
tables sizes, to publish your external reachability to your interior gateway
routing protocol, otherwise
troll
1. v.,n. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a posting on
Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames; or, the post
itself. Derives from the phrase trolling for newbies which in turn comes
from mainstream trolling, a style of fishing in which one trails bait
, because cisco wont allow
you to config inet addresses on a subif if you have no encap spec'd.
Personally i think it'd be cake to get nat up and running on the same
interface if they diddnt require you to config an encap.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
no it doesnt.
In fact under general circumstances those source macs are the MAC of the
router that was the last hop onto the lan.
Although i would love to, at the moment i dont have time to explain where
arp is used and how it works =)
Now, im guessing this 6509 has an MSFC (or MSFC2) am i
Was james bond a CCIE?
-Original Message-
From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]
I actually heard that the Rifle Part was not in Swahili, but
Very insightful. I had never thought about it like that.
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:11 PM
To: Peter Slow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]
obviously not. Bond had a license
Assigning recognizable addresses with /32 masks would be considered best
practises in my opinion. Ideally, these are publicly routable in the SP
space.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/22/2001 at 9:02 AM Edmondson, Dorothy M wrote:
Is there a preferred addressing scheme for
you're wrong.
the /28 will be chosen.
-humboldt
-Original Message-
From: Ednilson Rosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
In this case, if you want to communicate with the host
oops. diddn't click reply all...
-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:43 AM
To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; Peter Slow
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
when we speak about a network, we speak about a pair, a net id and a netmask
if we learn
you meant a router INTERFACE.
a port is a tcp or udp port.
-Original Message-
From: Leonardo Toco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Command to route directly to host [7:16820]
Hi, I need your help !!!
I need to set a
I DONT get this... the commands say LDP but the output says TDP
so anyone know which this version is using? I'm looking on CCO now and have
yet to find a decisive answer...
c3660#sh version
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3660-JS-M), Version 12.2(2)T,
It rally depends on your version of ifconfig/what kernel your using/what
adapter you have.
Tell us those things and we'll try and help.
otherwise read RTFM
(granted the man page doesnt have the promisc flag, the option for you is
promisc.)
-humboldt
bash-2.03$ man ifconfig
IFCONFIG(8)
btw, i think you should remove any configuratio you have on the routers
pertaining to DHCP.
you dont need them. we are BRIDGED =)
helper addresses and the like are for routed stuff, we dont want that here.
have you tried this config without any dhcp stuff on the routers?
...this is what i would
I know you meant ethernet trunking. of course you did, you couldnt have
forgotten ATM and FDDI. Or token ring for that matter.
And you meant fastethernet interface, diddnt you?
-humboldt
-Original Message-
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22,
an INTERFACE a thing, such as an ethernet or loopback interface.
a port is a logical device, and NO a loopback does not count.
i meant like tcp ports, usp ports, and the like.
Stop being d0rks and copying everyone else who does it
wrong, and dont be afraid to tell people to speak correctly!
, August 22, 2001 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]
Uh, I think you meant UDP ports!!!
If you are going to get on peoples cases for being wrong, at least try and
be correct ;)
No offense of course :)
-Original Message-
From: Peter
if you guys would just stop using hubs and
non-unicast mac-addresses, we'd all be fine =)
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Promiscous interface and remote users
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]
Does the IEEE get it wrong? Check IEEE 802.1D, the bridging standard. It
uses ports for the physical interfaces on a bridge (switch).
Priscilla
At 01:08 PM 8/22/01, Peter Slow wrote:
an INTERFACE a thing
Peter Slow wrote:
an INTERFACE a thing, such as an ethernet or loopback interface.
a port is a logical device, and NO a loopback does not count.
i meant like tcp ports, usp ports, and the like.
Stop being d0rks and copying everyone else who does it
wrong, and dont be afraid to tell people to speak
: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:03 PM
To: Peter Slow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]
Interface: the place at which independent and often unrelated systems meet
and act on or communicate with each other
Port: a hardware interface by which a computer
:27 PM
To: Peter Slow; Cisco@Groupstudy. Com
Subject: RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]
You should get slapped around for not capitalizing the first letter of a
sentence or the word I, and for not using punctuation properly.
Let he who is without grammatical error cast the first
For clarity since VLANs are a pet peeve of mine, can we ask which router
will route between trunked interfaces? One does not route between VLANs,
one routes between IP subnets with IP routers.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/21/2001 at 2:40 AM EA Louie wrote:
any router that
Is there a question here that I'm missing?
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/21/2001 at 7:06 AM Cisco Lover wrote:
Hi Guys..
Come with some New Queston..
For eg,
our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub
Spoke
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
must ?
- Original Message -
From: Peter Van Oene
To: EA Louie ;
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:51 AM
Subject: Re: What Router for Routing Between VLANS [7:16609]
For clarity since VLANs are a pet peeve of mine, can we ask which router
will route between trunked interfaces? One does
Who posted it!?
-Original Message-
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Ethernet interface as DHCP client? [7:16724]
Found my answer. One lonely little reference in a ton of hits in the
yuppers.
HEY MY EMAIL WORKS!
...but anyway, as of IOS 12.1.2(T)
the command ip address dhcp is functional.
..it works, too.
put a T-train image later than 12.1.2 on yer router, and you'll be all set.
I am not sure if you need ip plus for this. i dont think so, but it's
posssible.
-Original
the buisness guys only know about layers 8, 9 and 10...
-humboldt
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HELP!! The Cisco Code Windows XP [7:16604]
Priscilla,
I find that whiskey
HSRP and interface tracking seems viable to me
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/21/2001 at 6:06 PM Kim Quang Vo wrote:
I am using 2 routers of 2610. (router A og B)
router A and B in the same LAN.
serial interface of A og B connection to two others ISP routers.
LAN using
Hi Richard,
Some good CCO links have already been posted. I just wanted to add a quick
point.
This command is useful as a tool for providing a semi dynamic default
route. For example, if you are connected to two upstream networks which
both offer you routes toward a destination, say 10/8 for
Keep in mind that one routes between IP subnets, not VLANs. VLANs are a
layer two concept. From there you should be able to answer you own first
question. In the second case, given IP subnets have unique ranges, only on
PC will be on the valid subnet and hence be able to communicate to the rest
This means that although the switch cannot prevent the forwarding of invalid
frames since it begins forwarding prior to verifying the checksum, it can
keep track of the number of errored frames since it does eventually verify
the checksum. In other words, unlike store and forward switches who
I'm not sure where you got the idea that one big area zero is a bad thing?
In this case, I would highly recommend it. This is a pretty small network
and I really don't see the benefit of adding hierarchy to it from a
multi-area perspective. Keep in mind that the more you segment an OSPF area
I should have limited that to one big area vs one big area 0. I'm all for
single areas when they suit, but I agree that using a non zero area can have
some benefits.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/17/2001 at 10:24 AM Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
I'm not sure where you got the
Hey Ralph,
This statement is quite true. Is there an area you wish to break down more
fully?
For support, see the draft-ietf-ospf-abr-alt-04.txt which includes the
following text:
In OSPF domains the area topology is restricted so that there must be
a backbone area (area 0) and all other
It is untouched unless a provider decides to mess with it which is not
completely uncommon.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/15/2001 at 9:19 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does ip precedence field remain intact while traveling through different
autonomous systems or is it set to a
The metric that exists in a summary LSA is representative of the entire path
to the destination network, excluding situations where aggregation has taken
place. Specifically, when an ABR generates a type 3, it populates the
metric field of that summary with the current metric for the route as
I believe scan time pertains to the frequency that a PE router queries a
VPNv4 route reflector to ensure that it has a complete routing picture for
its configured VPN's. This is 2547bis functionality. However, to me, this
requires support of outbound route filtering (ORF) and I'm not sure if
This is really the domain of text books on network design and short bursts
of text aren't likely to do the question any justice. As with similar
questions like how many routers in an OSPF area this question yields a
variety of answers depending on the desired functionality and related
your malloc errs may be from enormous logs you are creating, im not sure.
good possibility, tho.
turn on some debugs and post those.
what concerns me is that your protocol isnt just going down, the interface
is really resetting.
turn on debugs like
deb int serial
debug serial int
debug serial
for granted.
Glad to help.
pete
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/8/2001 at 3:40 PM Ole Drews Jensen wrote:
Thanks once again Peter,
I now have a much better understanding of the BGP.
I can now jump on to some of the other areas where I'm still leaking a
little understanding, so I can
This is getting ridiculous! I can seem to figure out the address to remove
him.
*** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE ***
On 8/8/2001 at 8:39 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your message
Subject: RE: BGP: IBGP usage/clarification [7:15333]
was not delivered to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sometimes when I make bank deposits I forget my calculator. In actual fact
I don't own a calculator and bringing my laptop to the ATM to add up the
money sees odd to me. It is in cases like this that I use my brain. I've
also had to quickly rebuild routed networks to avoid downtime and in the
A couple quick notes. However I would suggest if you have a subscription
that you step through Howards BGP series at www.certificationzone.com as it
might help you solidify your understanding.
First off, IBGP is not an IGP. If you want to get from point A to point B
in AS C, IBGP isn't your
Comments inline
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/8/2001 at 2:48 PM Ole Drews Jensen wrote:
Thanks Peter.
I have browsed through Howards's BGP series, but for me, sometimes too long
explanations are more frustrating than a 10 words fact.
Two additional questions if you don't mind
I just want to make sure I can make this work.
I have a Cisco 1720 with 2 T1 DSU/CSU's.
I want one T1 will be a point-to-point connection going to another office.
The second T1 will be going to my ISP.
I want the point-to-point users to be able to use my ISP's internet access.
I will be using
Cheapskate is an understatement.
Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15414t=15401
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure
This problem has nothing to do with Route Reflection and is simply the
typical behavior for IBGP. Next_Hop attributes are not changed throughout
the AS. Your indication of the two methods of handling next hop resolution
are accurate, and which you use tends to be a point of preference. I find
A quick thought here.
You are correct in saying that the network statement is a trigger used to
inject routes into the BGP process. However, it really has nothing to do
with IBGP specifically nor does it in any way allow intra AS routing to
occur. Routing within the AS will always be the
Since Howard is in London, allow me to ask What problem are you trying to
solve?
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/3/2001 at 10:07 PM Santosh Koshy wrote:
Hi All,
I have a slight dilemma to which I cannot seem to find a definitive
answer.. We have 4 circuits going from Canada
clear ip ospf database?
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/3/2001 at 10:13 AM Nabil Fares wrote:
Greetings,
Is there a way to flush the OSPF database without rebooting he router?
Thanks,
Nabil
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14797t=14793
To my knowledge, there are no proponents of sub 1518 byte IP MTU's to be
used as defaults on internet routers. I would tend to think that at least
4470 would make sense. Per my previous post in this thread, I am of the
opinion that a consensus hasn't been reached at this point on this issue.
There was actually some recent debate on this issue within the ISIS wg in
the IETF from some notable folks including Tony Li from Procket (ex
Juniper/Cisco). In reality, there isn't a standard IP MTU in use which can
create some problems. Some of the key issues include the use of private
Hi all,
I've configured dialer watch for ISDN backup an when I shutdown the primary
inter face and debug dialer is turned on I only receive the following
Aug 29 15:14:42.551: DDR: Dialer Watch: watch-group = 150
Aug 29 15:14:42.551: DDR: network 192.6.6.0/255.255.255.252 DOWN,
Aug 29
Ok, one more round of nit picky comments and I'll quit :)
Do I need a router between my VLANs?
If you want the VLANs to communicate with each other. Are these trick
questions? ;-) I realize there are cases where you don't want them to
communicate. I guess that is what you are getting at.
I've heard similar in the past. However, keep in mind that very few
enterprise networks will ever generate traffic at that level. I've never
seen any network even turn on the utilization lights on the C6k or C5k for
that matter. Too often people weight sheer throughput higher than other
Good points. I should certainly clarify that I don't advocate bridging
between VLANs unless it makes sense to do so which is usually a corner
case. I also fully support properly scoping broadcast domains and using a
one vlan to one subnet methodology for cleanliness. I love simple
networks. I
Incline comment
And the question often is, what problem are you trying to solve by
routing between VLANs? There certainly are reasons, in a campus
environment, to bridge between VLANs with a L2 switch, such as the
VLAN users in one or more buildings and the servers for that VLAN in
a separate
401 - 500 of 920 matches
Mail list logo
