Took and passed this test today.
If you take the recommended classroom training, this is more than adequate
preparation.
If you don't have the time to take a week off for the classroom training, I
recommend using CCO resources plus spending the few dollars for the
B*O*S*O*N Wireless SE practice
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth) wrote:
On May 19, 4:50pm, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
}
} I guess he's just using an IOS image that doesn't support
inter-VLAN
} routing. Can someone point me to a chart? I don't have a CCO
login though.
Feature Navigator is always where to find
So, we started to implement the campus LAN design that I mentioned in
previous messages, but we can't seem to do VLAN trunking on the darn 2600
router!
When we do:
int fa0/0
no ip address
int fa0/0.1
encapsulation dot1q 100
The router claims that the encapsulation is invalid input.
When we
mplement the campus LAN design that I mentioned in
previous messages, but we can't seem to do VLAN trunking on the darn 2600
router!
When we do:
int fa0/0
no ip address
int fa0/0.1
encapsulation dot1q 100
The router claims that the encapsulation is invalid input.
When we tried to do the IP
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
So, we started to implement the campus LAN design that I
mentioned in previous messages, but we can't seem to do VLAN
trunking on the darn 2600 router!
When we do:
int fa0/0
no ip address
int fa0/0.1
encapsulation dot1q 100
The router claims
)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
System image file is flash:c2600-js-mz.122-1.bin
cisco 2621 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x102) with 58368K/7168K bytes
of memory
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
So, we started to implement the campus LAN design that I mentioned in
previous messages, but we can't seem
Larry Letterman wrote:
Pris,
I did the below on a 2621 router with the sh ver for ios code
Larry
Router(config)#int fa0/1
Router(config-if)#no ip address
Router(config-if)#int fa0/1.1
Router(config-subif)#encap ?
dot1Q IEEE 802.1Q Virtual LAN
isl Inter Switch Link
)#
I generally keep the VLAN and suninterface the same, easier to keep
straight.
Dave
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
So, we started to implement the campus LAN design that I mentioned in
previous messages, but we can't seem to do VLAN trunking on the darn 2600
router!
When we do
Software Download
File name Description Size 'Bytes' Date Published More Info
c2600-js-mz.122-1d.bin ENTERPRISE PLUS 11504788 02/10/2002
10:01:38
s vermill wrote:
Larry,
Is -js- an enterprise image or just IP Plus?
Scott
Message Posted at:
I guess he's just using an IOS image that doesn't support inter-VLAN
routing. Can someone point me to a chart? I don't have a CCO login though.
Here's his attempt to use the encapsulation command and a show version and
show flash.
RTR#config t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End
) processor (revision 0x102) with
58368K/7168K bytes
of memory
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
So, we started to implement the campus LAN design that I
mentioned in
previous messages, but we can't seem to do VLAN trunking on
the darn 2600
router!
When we do:
int fa0/0
Try a plus image and you'll be set.
Dave
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
I guess he's just using an IOS image that doesn't support inter-VLAN
routing. Can someone point me to a chart? I don't have a CCO login though.
Here's his attempt to use the encapsulation command and a show version and
Scott,
If you have access this URL will help:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/432/7.html
Dave
Larry Letterman wrote:
Software Download
File name Description Size 'Bytes' Date Published More Info
c2600-js-mz.122-1d.bin ENTERPRISE PLUS 11504788 02/10/2002
10:01:38
MADMAN wrote:
Scott,
If you have access this URL will help:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/432/7.html
Dave
Dave,
That is excellent. Many thanks! I'd like to paste the part that breaks
down the feature codes but since Cisco has put it behind a login, I'm a
little
s vermill wrote:
MADMAN wrote:
Scott,
If you have access this URL will help:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/432/7.html
Dave
Dave,
That is excellent. Many thanks! I'd like to paste the part
that breaks down the feature codes but since Cisco has put it
On May 19, 4:50pm, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
}
} I guess he's just using an IOS image that doesn't support inter-VLAN
} routing. Can someone point me to a chart? I don't have a CCO login though.
Feature Navigator is always where to find the answer for questions
like this; however, you
Oppenheimer wrote:
So, we started to implement the campus LAN design that I
mentioned in previous messages, but we can't seem to do VLAN
trunking on the darn 2600 router!
When we do:
int fa0/0
no ip address
int fa0/0.1
encapsulation dot1q 100
The router claims that the encapsulation
Thanks Scott! It does bode well, despite the weird Dest Unreachable (Port
Unreachable) from the server.
Thanks again.
Priscilla
s vermill wrote:
Priscilla,
Well, its been an interesting project. Unfortunately, the
DHCP server app that I wound up trying (Vicomsoft) was so buggy
that I
Priscilla,
I havent forsaken you (yet). But heres the deal:
My 2610 only has 24M of memory. I ignored the recommendation for at least
40M to run 12.1 IP Plus only to meet with disastrous results. I need IP
Plus on this old clunker to enable dot1q (and Im pretty sure at least 12.1
also).
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
It's a fast Ethernet trunk, actually. I forgot to mention that. He does
have
some internal servers. Do you think in and out of a Fast Ethernet trunk
will
be less of a problem?
The 2600 might be.
He had a broadcast meltdown last week. Perhaps that's why he's
Hey Priscilla,
I feel about 10 times better knowing it's a fast ethernet :) If
there's anyway to localize the traffic, such as putting department X's
clients and servers on vlan 100, and department Y's clients/servers on the
other, it'd be optimal. But even if you can't it should run
]
Subject: campus LAN design w/DHCP server [7:59578]
Sorry if this is a dumb question! ;-) I want to make sure this design
will work before implementing it.
The customer has been using 192.168.168.0/24 in one small flat LAN. He
has run out of these addresses and is being hit by performance issues
If everyone just goes to the internet, it'll work. But if you've got one or
more servers internally, I'd be real afraid of trunking on a 10 mb interface.
You'll reduce your broadcasts, but I think performance will suffer horribly
crossing the router. Since you've run out of addresses on a /24, I
It's a fast Ethernet trunk, actually. I forgot to mention that. He does have
some internal servers. Do you think in and out of a Fast Ethernet trunk will
be less of a problem?
You know my first reaction was also just move the subnet mask over. But he
didn't seem to want to do that.
He had a
Sorry if this is a dumb question! ;-) I want to make sure this design will
work before implementing it.
The customer has been using 192.168.168.0/24 in one small flat LAN. He has
run out of these addresses and is being hit by performance issues related to
broadcasts.
He wants to implement
Priscilla,
I'm sure someone can verify this with a 2600 specifically. As far as DHCP
in general, yes. We just did this with a much larger 6509-based network.
No problems. The only difference, of course, is that the MSFC has virtual
router interfaces per VLAN - not subinterfaces on a router on
No more drinks for you, pris
Design seems like it will work...till an intern puts up a nother dhcp
server on the same vlan and people get wrong address's
:-P
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Sorry if this is a dumb question! ;-) I want to make sure this design will
work before implementing it.
Maybe what I really need for Christmas is a new router. ;-) My routers are
too old to do this sort of stuff. It would be terrific if you could mock it
up.
I'm just not totally conviced the router will behave the way it obviously
should. Could be the egg nog though.
Thank-you. I am indebted to
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: LAN Design [7:54023]
Yes, Sem1 does concentrate on Layer 1. We teach the concepts from the
bottom up. But, as we all know, Top Down Network Design is best. Didn't
someone write a book on it? All good design starts by getting Layer
Chuck,
Originally I got the oversubscribe numbers from extreme a few years ago...
Now days, with fast switches, it makes no real diference...
the rationale is that all ports wont be active at the same timeso
you can
oversubscribe the access switches by 3 or 4 to 1
Chuck's Long Road
Larry Letterman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Chuck,
Originally I got the oversubscribe numbers from extreme a few years ago...
Now days, with fast switches, it makes no real diference...
CL: numbers are always interesting. especially when compared to what
]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN Design [7:54023]
If i have to design network for 3 storey on a building. There are around
200-300 workstations in 2 storey each. Is it advisable to use Ethernet to
link them up. As for the other storey it is for admin
Let say if i use a 100Mbps switch for 300 user for each floor. Will it be
very slow? How do i really calculate the BW for each user. Doing an
approximation? 100M/300 ?
Cheers,
Jimmy
Jimmy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
If i have to design network for 3 storey on
which platform are you going to use for 300 users...
6500 ?
4006 ?
or multiple stackables ?
Jimmy wrote:
Let say if i use a 100Mbps switch for 300 user for each floor. Will it be
very slow? How do i really calculate the BW for each user. Doing an
approximation? 100M/300 ?
Cheers,
Jimmy
Jimmy
hmm...Let don't talk about product. Just for a general view. Will a normal
100Mbps switch able to support 300 user? Is it realistic in real life
application?
Larry Letterman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
which platform are you going to use for 300 users...
6500
: LAN Design [7:54023]
hmm...Let don't talk about product. Just for a general view. Will a
normal 100Mbps switch able to support 300 user? Is it realistic in real
life application?
Larry Letterman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
which platform are you goin
.
- Original Message -
From: Jimmy
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:17 AM
Subject: Re: LAN Design [7:54023]
hmm...Let don't talk about product. Just for a general view. Will a normal
100Mbps switch able to support 300 user? Is it realistic in real life
application?
Larry Letterman
a different approach.
Juan Blanco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Garrett Allen
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LAN Design [7:54023]
as a rule of thumb 10mbps ethernet to the user end station
Always allow room for growth, I would implement Core gigabit switch that
interefaces with at least 3 other switches.
Cheers,
Joe
Jimmy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
If i have to design network for 3 storey on a building. There are around
200-300 workstations
The product makes a big difference. Are you planning to have one switch
with 300 ports or 30 switches with 12 ports? Are you planning to use
VLANs? If so will there be more than 64?
The traffic pattern makes a huge difference as does the network design.
If you're using 30 switches
Jimmy wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
hmm...Let don't talk about product. Just for a general view. Will a normal
100Mbps switch able to support 300 user? Is it realistic in real life
application?
CL: good idea. so let's start with the fundamentals as I
IP Group
iReadyWorld
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN Design [7:54023]
If i have to design network for 3 storey on a building. There are around
200-300 workstations in 2 sto
Chuck's Long Road wrote:
CL:my employer has lots of idle sales engineers who would just love to talk
to you, not to mention sell you something :-
So does Mine :)
:Larry Letterman
Cisco...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54080t=54023
Message-
From: Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN Design [7:54023]
If i have to design network for 3 storey on a building. There
are around
200-300 workstations in 2 storey each. Is it advisable to use
From: Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN Design [7:54023]
If i have to design network for 3 storey on a building. There
are around
200-300 workstations in 2 storey each. Is it advisable to use
LOL
Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA
Sr. Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld
-Original Message-
From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LAN Design [7:54023]
Chuck's Long Road wrote
]
Subject: Re: LAN Design [7:54023]
Thank-you very much for the recommendations for Top-Down Network Design. I
probably don't express my gratitude often enough to the many people who
bought the book.
I suspect that we may be helping a Cisco Networking Academy student with
homework. ;-) This sounds a lot
ly watch the wrap )
tm
Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA
Sr. Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LAN Design
First of all, thank for the wonderful response.
So from what you all have said. If the user is for normal purpose like
running some application on servers and access the Internet. Will a 100Mbps
be sufficient for 300 users. As for the users, they will be splitted into
several group of around
]
Subject: Re: LAN Design [7:54023]
First of all, thank for the wonderful response.
So from what you all have said. If the user is for normal purpose like
running some application on servers and access the Internet. Will a 100Mbps
be sufficient for 300 users. As for the users, they will be splitted
Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN Design [7:54023]
If i have to design network for 3 storey on a building.
There
are around
200-300 workstations in 2 storey each. Is it advisable to
use
Ethernet to
link them up. As for the othe
Jimmy wrote:
First of all, thank for the wonderful response.
So from what you all have said. If the user is for normal
purpose like
running some application on servers and access the Internet.
Will a 100Mbps
be sufficient for 300 users.
We don't have enough info about the applications
after I was downsized. :-
Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA
Sr. Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN Design [7:54023]
If i have to design network for
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Jimmy wrote:
snip for breveity
300 users on each floor? OK, so you do need some routers or routing
switches
in there. Or at least some VLANs to contain the spread of broadcasts.
The
backbone switch
Jimmy,
The access switch(users) should not be oversubscribed by more than 3 to
1in my opinion..
the total user bandwidth if you have a 12 port switch at 100 mb per port
is 1.2 gb...the switch needs to be able to
handle at least 400 mb of thruput
also the core switches should be
Larry Letterman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Jimmy,
The access switch(users) should not be oversubscribed by more than 3 to
1in my opinion..
the total user bandwidth if you have a 12 port switch at 100 mb per port
is 1.2 gb...the switch needs to be able
Chuck,
Are you in the US? It mus be deep into the night, though I do not know the
time zones there very well (2.15 pm in Japan.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54183t=54023
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN Design [7:54023]
If i have to design network for 3 storey on a building.
There
are around
200-300 workstations in 2 storey each. Is it advisable to
use
Ethernet to
link them up. As for the other storey it is f
If i have to design network for 3 storey on a building. There are around
200-300 workstations in 2 storey each. Is it advisable to use Ethernet to
link them up. As for the other storey it is for admin purpose. The distance
is around 150m between the further storey. However it is possible to put a
often. Great book, excellent methodology.
Tim Medley, CCNP+Voice, CCDP, CWNA
Sr. Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN Design [7:54023]
If i have
Trying to figure the following routing issue out with the following:
http://cisco-skin.tripod.com/Network.htm
Thanks in advance.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21508t=21508
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Can you give any more information regarding the static ARP's/CAM's applied
Jeff?
Cheers,
Gareth
Jeff Duchin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Trying to figure the following routing issue out with the following:
http://cisco-skin.tripod.com/Network.htm
Thanks
MSFC1s, or MSFC2s? What version of code? I know there are multiple issues
with in-chassis redundancy with MSFC2s and HSRP...
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Duchin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 12:35:38 -0400
Subject: Help with LAN design/routing [7:21508]
Trying
Switch A has SUP2/MSFC2 running 12.1(7)E and Switch B has SUPq/MSFC1 also
with 12.1(7)E. Both are configured for Redundancy/H.A./Configsync. Any
ideas?
The static arp entry is on each MSFC stating the MAC/IP address of the
virtual ip address of the firewall's (as StoneBeat uses this much the
I did find this on StoneBeats website:
You have to define also static ARP entries for the directly connected Cisco
routers if you are not using dedicated IP addresses.
http://www.stonesoft.com/document/art/329.html
Jeff Duchin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Try adding a cam entry not only for the actual ports the firewalls plug
into, but also include the trunk ports in the cam entry.
Clayton Price
Jeff Duchin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I did find this on StoneBeats website:
You have to define also static ARP
on, i.e what we called routing in the old days.
Hope that sheds some light.
-Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf =
Of
Ron Stark
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN design
Hi people,
I
d forwarding based
on
that information, i.e what we called routing in the old days.
Hope that sheds some light.
-Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ron Stark
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 10:06 AM
To: [EMAI
And by default, most current Cisco routers already have Fast Switching or
better enabled (unless extended IP access lists are applied, if I remember
right).
I think this is an outdated statement, although I do not know
what IOS release(s) changed this thought. On a 2500 running
12.1(2) IP:
Behalf Of
Ron Stark
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN design
Hi people,
I have a design question that I was wondering if someone could shed some
light
on. With all the talk of layer3 switching these days, is it a good idea
to
switch a
still a layer 3 path determination and forwarding based on
that information, i.e what we called routing in the old days.
Hope that sheds some light.
-Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ron Stark
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PRO
All things taken into consideration a core in many cases will be better served at
layer 2, with routing taking place at the edges of the core at the access and
distribution layers. This moves the path selection processing to the edges and
leaves the core as a layer 2 transit area normally with
"Ron Stark" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 07/21/2000 10:05:56 AM
Please respond to "Ron Stark" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Ron Stark/SanDiego/Cymer)
Subject: LAN design
Hi people,
I have a design question that I was wondering if someone could shed so
ting in the old days.
Hope that sheds some light.
-Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ron Stark
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LAN design
Hi people,
I have a design
Wollman
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LAN design
And depending on the network topology you can even skip a few
layer 2 hops and 1 layer 3 hop when compare to traditional
routing.
Tony Olzak wrote:
But the performance is still much faster than manua
75 matches
Mail list logo
