EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Difference between Cisco VPN and PIX Firewall [7:75235]
Hello all
Can I know what is the Cisco PIX and that of a Cisco
VPN 3000 in terms of performance?
As I am planning to implement VPN with either VPN
Concentrator or PIX,however I was told that if you
implement onl
Stnadard answer: it depends.
Followed immediately by the standard question: what problem are you
trying to solve?
The VPN Concentrator does not firewall or filter; it is a specialized
tunnel termination device. You may (emphasis on may) need to use it
when you are terminating more than about 2
Hello all
Can I know what is the Cisco PIX and that of a Cisco
VPN 3000 in terms of performance?
As I am planning to implement VPN with either VPN
Concentrator or PIX,however I was told that if you
implement only VPN Concentrator instead of PIX ,then
you may get VPN connectivity but you will not be
03 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: RE: Slow Browsing via 500 Pix firewall [7:74583]
Is the problem related to a slow initial connection to a Web Server? If
so
then it could be an IDENT protocol problem (TCP port 113 connection
coming
back to you from the server). Try putting "service resetoutside" on th
, Security
Lab Technician
GigaVelocity.com
- Original Message -
>From: "Jurkouich, Brett, CNTR, DCAA"
>Reply-To: "Jurkouich, Brett, CNTR, DCAA"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Slow Browsing via 500 Pix firewall [7:74583]
>Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:20:06 G
e a nice day.
Regards,
keng loon
-Original Message-
From: Faisal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 1 September 2003 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Slow Browsing via 500 Pix firewall [7:74583]
Hi All,
I am having problem of slow or interminnent browsing through pi
e a nice day.
Regards,
keng loon
-Original Message-
From: Faisal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 1 September 2003 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Slow Browsing via 500 Pix firewall [7:74583]
Hi All,
I am having problem of slow or interminnent browsing through pi
, Security
Lab Technician
GigaVelocity.com
- Original Message -
>From: "Jurkouich, Brett, CNTR, DCAA"
>Reply-To: "Jurkouich, Brett, CNTR, DCAA"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Slow Browsing via 500 Pix firewall [7:74583]
>Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:20:06 G
DCAA
Sent: 02 September 2003 19:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Slow Browsing via 500 Pix firewall [7:74583]
Try turning off the port 80 inspecting with the "no fixup protocol http
80" command
-Original Message-
From: Faisal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, Septembe
Try turning off the port 80 inspecting with the "no fixup protocol http
80" command
-Original Message-
From: Faisal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 1:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Slow Browsing via 500 Pix firewall [7:74583]
Hi All,
I am havi
Hi All,
I am having problem of slow or interminnent browsing through pix firewall. If
I bypass the traffic speeds are fine. But if all that traffic is going via
firewall then it becomes extremely slow. Please anybody can help me how to
sort this out.
Regards
Faisal
Message Posted at:
http
The command is: copy tftp flash:pdm
Jay Dunn
IPI*GrammTech, Ltd.
http://www.ipi-gt.com
Nunquam Facilis Est
>I was trying to find out what the proper procedure for upgrading the PDM
>on a PIX box is. The documentation on Cisco's site cover installation
>(including on an existing box) but it doesn
n't seem to address
> specifically the upgrade. Can I simply send the binary via TFTP? The
> Cisco documentation doesn't seem to specify whether it will affect the
> firewall config or not. I wouldn't assume that it would but we all know
> what we get when we ass
I was trying to find out what the proper procedure for upgrading the PDM
on a PIX box is. The documentation on Cisco's site cover installation
(including on an existing box) but it doesn't seem to address
specifically the upgrade. Can I simply send the binary via TFTP? The
Cisco documentation do
dmz.host.ip.addr dns netmask
255.255.255.255 0 0"
I don't have a 3-interface pix to test these possible solutions on, so I
can't say for certain that I'm correct. :(
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Richard Botham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 7:12 AM
To: [
Charles/Mark,
No infinate wisdom i'm afraid - just my £0.2.
Is it because the statements below effectively do nothing due to the fact
the statement 2 undoes what statement one has just done ?
[or have i missed the point.]
1)alias (inside) SERVERA_DMZ SERVERA_OUTSIDE 255.255.255.255
2)alias (ins
times more info than you wanted).
Mark Smith
-----Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX Firewall --- DMZ to Inside Access [7:69877]
Fellows -
I have a senario here,
I have a PIX firew
: Curious [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX Firewall --- DMZ to Inside Access [7:69877]
Fellows -
I have a senario here,
I have a PIX firewall with 3 Interfaces , Inside, Outside and DMZ.
Machines on the Inside Interface can access
Fellows -
I have a senario here,
I have a PIX firewall with 3 Interfaces , Inside, Outside and DMZ.
Machines on the Inside Interface can access Server on DMZ Zone, no problem,
I have to facilitate limited access from DMZ zone Servers to Host on Inside
Interface.
Let take an example,
I have a
-Original Message-
From: Charles Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 7:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX Firewall 6.2.2 Inside network can not reach DMZ hosts
[7:69756]
Hi, all,
I have a problem that is making me scream and shout, gonna knock myself
o
Hi, all,
I have a problem that is making me scream and shout, gonna knock myself out.
It has to do with my PIX firewall configuration.
The long and short of my problem is that the inside network can only reach
inside hosts and outside networks: it can not reach any host on on the DMZ,
depsite
Hi all,
I protected my system by using PIX 515 and all my system and Network behind
that PIX,
I am trying to configure my PIX to allow the voice chat to allow my internal
users to talk with external people using MSN and Yahoo messenger Voice chat
service...
Actually I failed to get it up
Can an
Hi Robert,
Your first static line wont work .. if you think about it, you will be
trying to pass an IP address (which the pix thinks is on the inside
interface), in from the outside interface. The Pix will see this as
spoofing and drop the packet.
What are you trying to achieve ?
Robert Pere
Can the following be done??
Inside int: 10.1.1.0
outside int: 172.16.1.0
static (inside, outside) 10.1.1.0 10.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.155
static (inside, outside) tcp 10.1.1.1 telnet 207.208.203.21 telnet netmask
255.255.255.255
Since these are overlapping, will it work? Thx
**
usage is about 85MB.
My question is: should I enable PFS on all the tunnels without bringing
down
the Pix520 firewalls? Since the pix firewall is running on an Intel CPU, I
can always
replace the current PIII 500 with another PIII 850 but I don't think cisco
would like
that. By the wa
Network OperationsSonic.net, Inc.
707.522.1000 2260 Apollo Way
707.547.2199 (FAX) Santa Rosa, CA 95407
- Original Message -
From: "Hitesh Pathak R"
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:21 PM
Subject: VPN & Cisco Secure PIX Firewall [7:6
Dear Group,
Need some info on establishing site-2-site VPN using Cisco secure 525 PIX
firewall. Can some body forward some url or sample config on the same.
Many thnx in advance
Thanks
Hitesh
DISCLAIMER:
Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to
Wipro Limited
hanan wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Could you please tell me in the PIX Cisco firewall their
> clients need to be
> firewall clients or not?
PIX isn't a client/server architecture. Firewalls generally aren't. The term
"firewall client" isn't used usually.
PIX is a network firewall that protects an insid
Hello
Could you please tell me in the PIX Cisco firewall their clients need to be
firewall clients or not?
Hanan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62761&t=62761
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://
Hello
Could you please tell me in the PIX Cisco firewall their clients need to be
firewall clients or not?
Hanan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62746&t=62746
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://
at all
> here.
>
> Realistically, though, your users are going to have
> any number of sessions
> established as they read their email, check the web,
> download files, and so
> on. It's possible that your 500K PIX firewall could
> only be able to handle
> about 5K
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello groupies,
> I was reading the PIX book and it apparently said that the no. of
connection
> supported by a PIX firewall (higher order) is 500,000. Does this mean that
> upto 500,000 sessions can be established or something else? If so, what do
I
> do if I
at all
here.
Realistically, though, your users are going to have any number of sessions
established as they read their email, check the web, download files, and so
on. It's possible that your 500K PIX firewall could only be able to handle
about 5K or 50K of your users if they are the ki
Hello groupies,
I was reading the PIX book and it apparently said that the no. of connection
supported by a PIX firewall (higher order) is 500,000. Does this mean that
upto 500,000 sessions can be established or something else? If so, what do I
do if I have a thoroughput of say 2 million users
Cool.
""Richard Deal"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62540&t=62512
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisc
To all,
I have received an email from Brantley Coile, on of the two co-developers of
the PIX firewall, congratulating me on my book. He kindly sent me
information about the development of the PIX and its subsequent sale to
Cisco. If you would like to see the entire story, please visit this link
B so would recommend
that upgrade.
Ian
http://www.ccie4u.com
Rack Rentals
-Original Message-
From: d tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Memory requirements on pix firewall?
Currently I have 448MB of RAM on
on is that do I
really need
that much memory on a firewall? Has anyone actually seen the pix firewall
using
even 256MB utilization? I am runing version 6.2(2) and sometime 6.3(0)
build 131
Even when I am DOSing this firewall (in a lab environment), memory never
seems
to go above 60MB.
DT
arting
the capture.
3. Use the 'show capture' command to see the results.
Hope this helps,
Scott
--- On Sun 01/26, Elijah Savage III wrote:
From: Elijah Savage III [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 18:21:10 GMT
Subject: RE: Help with pix firewa
using a real
syslog server on a Freebsd box. Once again thank you for your replies.
-Original Message-
From: Usman Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help with pix firewall logging [7:61902]
Hello
I think you did not
If it wasn't for those "Crappy" Windows machines, we would have jobs.
-Original Message-
From: d tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 9:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to stop SYN Flood with Pix firewall? [7:61891]
I am not sure h
Hello
I think you did not open port on pix to send log information to server
when you install pfss software it shows what ports it is using on TCP and
UDP check it and modify this commnad on pix
logging host inside 192.168.11.254 tcp/the port number
by default is uses 1468
but some time it use 1
It may that no alerts at the "warnings" level have occured. Trying setting
it at a high level such as 6 or 7 (which pretty much logs everthing). Once
you have ascertained that logging between the PIX and syslog server are
working, then restore it back to the warnings level.
HTH,
Charles
""Eli
Diliberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help with pix firewall logging [7:61902]
Is syslogd still accepting connections from network devices? Did you
change the firewall on the FreeBSD machine? The problem may not be the
PIX
Is syslogd still accepting connections from network devices? Did you
change the firewall on the FreeBSD machine? The problem may not be the
PIX.
Ken
>>> "Elijah Savage III" 01/26/03 10:11AM >>>
All,
I have a pix running 6.2 it is logging to a freebsd server on the
local
network. It was logg
As a last resort I did reboot the pix also but still no logging, what am
I missing?
-Original Message-
From: Elijah Savage III
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help with pix firewall logging [7:61902]
All,
I have a pix running 6.2 it is logging to
All,
I have a pix running 6.2 it is logging to a freebsd server on the local
network. It was logging at one time to syslog no problem but all of a
sudden it stopped and I can't get it working. Here is the logging config
I turned up logging to see if it would help and nothing. Yes I am sure
syslo
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 21:18, d tran wrote:
> I am not sure how many Packets/Sec hping2 generate but I don't think
100BaseT
> was saturated because the whole thing is connected to a Cisco 2924-XL
Enterprise
> switch (running 12.05(T)) IOS.
I mentioned this saturation stuff not to suggest that it
How many packet per second hping2 generates?
If it saturates 100BaseT, maybe you had just reached
performance limit of PIX520?
I am not trying to say that PIX will not handle traffic
in proximity of 150,000-200,000 pps.
I simply don't know that.
But, if it needs to analyze 150,000 SYN packets p
r via NATed address
172.16.1.71, they have NO problems surfing the Internet or any other network.
In fact, I am writing you this email as my other two linux servers are
sending
SYN flood to the web server and the CPU on the Pix firewall is at 99%.
You wouldn't have to fight the udp 1434 probl
, 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to stop SYN Flood with Pix firewall?
Guys,
I have the following scenario:
I have a pix 520 firewall (750MHz with 512MB of RAM) in the lab. The
"inside"
interface is 10.100.0.254/24 and the "outside" interfac
] [connection_limit] [em_limit]]
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_62/cmdref/s.htm#1026694
-Original Message-
From: "d tran"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 21:41:09 GMT
Subject: How to stop SYN Flood with Pix firewall? [7:61875]
Guy
/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_62/cmdref/s.htm#1026694
-Original Message-
From: "d tran"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 21:41:09 GMT
Subject: How to stop SYN Flood with Pix firewall? [7:61875]
Guys,
I have the following scenario:
I have a pix 520 firewall (750MHz wit
Guys,
I have the following scenario:
I have a pix 520 firewall (750MHz with 512MB of RAM) in the lab. The
"inside"
interface is 10.100.0.254/24 and the "outside" interface is
172.16.1.253/24.
I have a linux server residing on the "inside" network with IP 10.100.0.71
running
Apache Server and
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: access-list compiled on Pix firewall [7:61803]
I've used the turbo acl function and it seems like a nice feature but didn't
notice any real difference performance wise. Had 29 lines of filter
nt: Friday, January 24, 2003 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: access-list compiled on Pix firewall
Has anyone used the "access-list compiled" on the pix firewall? Cisco says
that
it optimizes the access-list and make things run smoother if your
access-list is
at
Has anyone used the "access-list compiled" on the pix firewall? Cisco says
that
it optimizes the access-list and make things run smoother if your
access-list is
at least 20 lines long. Has anyone actually measured this on a production
environment?
Adv
What is the difference between a Local Director and a Pix Firewall? Assume
they have at least 3 NICs each.
Also, I have recently purchased a Cisco Pix Firewall/Local Director on ebay.
I cannot seem to find the model #, all i know is its running
Version 4.14. Most likely it has 2MB flash. I
Hi,
Could you tell me why you are planning migrating from CheckPoint to PIX.
We use PIX and it is very good, but I don´t know CheckPoint and was
wondering if it is a good solution.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59091&t=58968
---
Original Message-
From: eric nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 December 2002 20:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: migration from CheckPoint to PIX firewall [7:58989]
Thanks everyone for your advices and input. Checkpoint license,
maintenance and support are very expensiv
and refuse to buy additional hardware. Save the written sign off for later
CYA use.
Regards,
Kent
At 02:39 AM 12/11/2002 +, eric nguyen wrote:
>My company is looking to migrate from CheckPoint over to Pix Firewall in the
>next
>
>couple of months and I have been assigned to this
> From: "eric nguyen"
> To:
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:38 PM
> Subject: OT: migration from CheckPoint to PIX firewall
>
>
> > My company is looking to migrate from CheckPoint over to Pix Firewall in
> the next
> >
> > couple of month
Roberts
CCIE #7886 (R&S / Security)
- Original Message -
From: "eric nguyen"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 7:38 PM
Subject: OT: migration from CheckPoint to PIX firewall
> My company is looking to migrate from CheckPoint over to Pix Firewall in
the next
>
>
ginal Message-
From: eric nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: migration from CheckPoint to PIX firewall
My company is looking to migrate from CheckPoint over to Pix Firewall in the
next
couple of m
cert. I have
a "franken" pix firewall running on a 350Mhz PII CPU with 512MB of RAM on a
16MB ISA flash. I know that Cisco Pix 525 is a PIII 700Mhz processor and it
supports Gigabit interface. I would like to stress test the franken pix
that I have
in the lab to see how much web, smt
ssage-
From: eric nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 4:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: migration from CheckPoint to PIX firewall [7:58957]
My company is looking to migrate from CheckPoint over to Pix Firewall in the
next
couple of months and I have b
My company is looking to migrate from CheckPoint over to Pix Firewall in the
next
couple of months and I have been assigned to this project. I have questions
about
Pix firewalls. We are a small company, less than 50 people.
a) Does pix firewall support QOS, traffic shaping or traffic
Basically you can setup your pix firewall with man vpngroup (poor man
approach) as you like. Each of the "vpngroup" can be described as
individual users. Since you don't have the budget for either an ACS or
MS (), this is the way to go. I've done this many times o
ECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN on PIX firewall 506
I got a Cisco secure PIX firewall 506 and Cisco 1700 series. I would to
setup
a VPN server and allow 10 remote users with authentication to connect to
my
company network via VPN client. I don't have any Cisco ACS and I don't
have
budget
I got a Cisco secure PIX firewall 506 and Cisco 1700 series. I would to setup
a VPN server and allow 10 remote users with authentication to connect to my
company network via VPN client. I don't have any Cisco ACS and I don't have
budget to buy it also. Is it possible to setup a VPN netw
> 1. To configure a PIX, is there any GUI interface or need to use Command
> Line Interface? If it has GUI interface, is it bundle with a PIX or need
to
> purchase separately?
Yes and it comes with the PIX. You'll hate it once you use it.
> 2. We plan to use 2 PIX for HA solution. Is it stable?
unit.it works, but sometimes you do see a pause in the traffic
flow.
-Original Message-
From: John Huston [mailto:nomail@;nomail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Questions about PIX firewall [7:24634]
> 1. To configure a PIX,
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Upgrading Cisco PIX Firewall [7:53403]
> ...
> > Hi everybody,
> > I4m trying to upgrade the Firewall PIX 535 (version 6.1.1
> to 6.1.2) in
> > Monitor mode. I4ve configured everything according to Cisco
> procedure, and
>
> ...
> > Hi everybody,
> > I4m trying to upgrade the Firewall PIX 535 (version 6.1.1
> to 6.1.2) in
> > Monitor mode. I4ve configured everything according to Cisco
> procedure, and
>
> > I4m able to ping the tftp server. But when I issue the tftp server
> command,
> > the image is not lo
ginal Message-
From: Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pix Firewall Logs [7:52099]
Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data
-Original Message-
From: Elijah Savag
Bill Creighton CCNP
Senior System Engineer
Motorola
iDEN CNRC Packet Data
-Original Message-
From: Elijah Savage III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pix Firewall Logs [7:52099]
I have my pix logging to a syslog server
I have my pix logging to a syslog server can anyone recommend a utility
for easily going through the logs?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52099&t=52099
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.gro
ry serves as an inspiration to job seekers and career changers
everywhere.
""patrick ramsey"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Guys/Gals,
> I've been swamped with emails asking on how to build a "Franken"
> Pix fir
Guys/Gals,
I've been swamped with emails asking on how to build a "Franken"
Pix firewall. All I can say is that "anyone" with a little brain can
figure out how to build a "franken" pix firewall. If you don't believe
me, do a "show version" on
From: "patrick ramsey"
To: "Andrew Benhase" ; "'Scott Morris'"
; "'Sabertech Networks'" ;
;
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:30 PM
Subject: Cisco "Franken" Pix Firewall (original author)
> Guys/Gals,
> I've been swamped
protections in their
equipment yet!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Sabertech Networks
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'patrick ramsey'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco
:36 PM
To: Scott Polano; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco "Franken" Pix Firewall
Making a Fraken-IDS shouldn't be something difficult either. It's an
Intel PC running Solaris
D];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco "Franken" Pix Firewall
Scott,
Thanks for setting me straight, I forgot about the legal
concept of "intention and design". When I buy a hamburger
at McDonalds, they intended that I eat it, it was designed for that
purpose, if use it
mistake.
Thanks
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Sabertech Networks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Roberts, Larry; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco "Franken" Pix Firewall [7:51067]
People, you're making it way too difficult
TECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'patrick ramsey'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco "Franken" Pix Firewall
Scott,
Thanks for setting me straight, I forgot about the legal concept of
"intention and design". W
t: RE: Cisco "Franken" Pix Firewall [7:51061]
In spite of all the urban legends to the contrary, there is no law
against
buying a computer, buying a card, putting the card in the computer
and selling it. You own both parts, do whatever you want, it's
a free country.
Last week I bought
white.
Thanks
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Sabertech Networks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'patrick ramsey'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco "Franken" Pix Firewall
Scott,
Thanks f
x27;; 'patrick ramsey'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco "Franken" Pix Firewall
And you believe it's smart to box with Cisco's lawyers why?
If you tried to sell your Franken Benz as something that "performs
exactly like a Mercedes Benz an
ve
been
>
>able to achieve had it not been for these two Pix clones. These two "clone"
>
>pix firewalls are running version 6.2(2) with PDM 2.0(2).
>
>Here is my question. I am pretty sure that it is illegal for me to sell
these
>
>"clone" pix firewall (
ent: Friday, August 09, 2002 11:45 AM
To: patrick ramsey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco "Franken" Pix Firewall
In spite of all the urban legends to the contrary, there is no law
against buying a computer, buying a card, putting the card in the
computer and selling it.
en Benz"?
Party onRichard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
patrick ramsey
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 6:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Cisco "Franken" Pix Firewall
Hope
ion 6.2(2) with PDM 2.0(2).
Here is my question. I am pretty sure that it is illegal for me to sell
these
"clone" pix firewall (please confirm); however, can I sell just the Pix
Flash card
without the dell machine?
Personally, I think this could be a great resource for
someone
) will passed
through the PIX firewall.
Request your expert comments and sugesstion the above
design.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards...Anil
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
Message Posted at
..or cisco for scep...
cordially,
lawrnce a sculark
LAWRENCE A SCULARK >From: "Daniel Czarnecki" >Reply-To: "Daniel
Czarnecki" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: PIX firewall v6.2 with
Windows 2000 Certificate Server [7:50136] >Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002
16:18:49
Hello Folks,
I am trying to configure PIX firewall v6.2 with Windows 2000 Certificate =
Server. I am getting this error when trying enrolll for certificate
through PDM.
[ERR] ca enroll hc cisco
%No CA root cert exists. Use "ca authenticate"
I would appreciate
>=20
Hello Folks,
I am trying to configure PIX firewall v6.2 with Windows 2000 Certificate =
Server. I am getting this error when trying enrolll for certificate =
through PDM.
I would appreciate any ideas.
Thank you in advance
Regards
Daniel=20
=20
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachm
The PIX 501 can be purchased for as little as $450 at many online
locations.
-Original Message-
From: Mr piyush shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PIX Firewall simulator ? Pls help [7:47466]
Dear all
I am planning
Dear all
I am planning to appear for CCIP security exams and I
am going through this study group regularly . In the
security exams I need a help from you all. In the
company where I am working we have Checkpoint f/w
hence I can't do any hands-on practice for PIX
Firewall . My sincere re
...
Thanks
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:06 PM
To: Roberts, Larry
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PIX Firewall (6.2) General Questions RANT [7:47393]
Actually, I hope you don't take it offline. I enjoy
#x27;s,
>you prefer CP's. We can take this off-line as it doesn't belong on this list
>anymore if you wish.
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Larry
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: david smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:42 PM
>To: [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 443 matches
Mail list logo
