At 5:32 PM + 9/10/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Reimer, Fred wrote:
>>
>> I've always liked hex myself. A hex mask of FF.FF.F8.00 can be
>> written as
>> F800 and still mean the same thing. You obviously can't do
>> that with
>> 255.255.128.0 (255.255.128.0 != 2,552,551,280). Wh
immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
At 11:34 AM -0400 9/10/03, Reimer, Fred wrote:
>Ye
er, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
Yes! Even I would not feel comfortable configuring BGP in a production
environment yet, and although I don't have my CCNP yet, I did pa
---Original Message-
> From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
>
> At 10:36 PM + 9/9/03, Dom wrote:
> >Fred, check out the
At 11:34 AM -0400 9/10/03, Reimer, Fred wrote:
>Yes, but the CCIE labs are supposed to be for ISP level engineers, who
>almost certainly won't be using default routes most of the time. It should
>be assumed that by the time you get to the CCIE level you have much
>experience in default routing.
>
At 11:40 AM -0400 9/10/03, Reimer, Fred wrote:
>I've always liked hex myself. A hex mask of FF.FF.F8.00 can be written as
>F800 and still mean the same thing. You obviously can't do that with
>255.255.128.0 (255.255.128.0 != 2,552,551,280). While binary works the same
>way as hex in this man
. If you are not the named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 6:33 AM
T
tember 09, 2003 11:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
At 10:36 PM + 9/9/03, Dom wrote:
>Fred, check out the archives for Howard's piece on the difference
>between 'Rocket Science' and 'BGP' when at NA
owitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
At 11:32 PM + 9/9/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Dom wrote:
>>
>> And one last point, No LAN is an island, why two
6:37 PM
To: 'Reimer, Fred'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
Oh, and while I'm on the subject - why EIGRP? This is a proprietary
Cisco Protocol. OK, I believe that Juniper may have implemented it, but
to the best of my knowledge no one
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
Dom wrote:
>
> And one last point, No LAN is an island, why two IG(P)
> protocols and no
> EG(P) protocol?
>
> A NA should at least a some understanding of how to connect to
> the
> ou
age-
From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Reimer, Fred'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
And one last point, No LAN is an island, why two IG(P) protocols and no
EG(P) pro
I get the same results as Marko, but this may lay it out so you (and
others) can see the development:
IP address = 32 bits
Network portion = 22 bits
Host portion = 10 bits
Total addresses for host portion = 2^10 = 1024
Start with 192.168.24.0/22
Focus on the 3rd octet (network_host): 000110_00
s message. If you are not the named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Aiello [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:
Here's a great resource:
pad
http://www.nanog.org/isp.html#cidr
scroll down to CIDR and download "Understanding IP Addressing: Everything
You Ever Wanted to Know" by Chuck Semeria
Looking at your specific problem - think in powers of two. 400 nodes is
greater than 256 but less than 512. Use /23 ou
Hi there,
There is a great link for al this you should check out:
http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf
Cheers,
Kenan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=75174&t=75050
--
**Please support Gr
ribute, copy, print
> or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Pleas
NOT in the know rely on the badges
>From: "Howard C. Berkowitz"
>Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
>Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 03:36:57 GMT
>
>At 11:32 PM + 9/9/03,
No offense, but this is CCNA material. If you are going for your CCNP, then
you should already have your CCNA and know the answer. But anyway...
If you need a network with 400 hosts, the smallest subnet would have a /23
mask. So take the first part of your given network and assign it to that:
>Oh, and while I'm on the subject - why EIGRP? This is a proprietary
>Cisco Protocol. OK, I believe that Juniper may have implemented it, but
>to the best of my knowledge no one else has.
Can we say account control?
EIGRP is somewhat less resource intensive than link state protocols
under some c
At 11:32 PM + 9/9/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Dom wrote:
>>
>> And one last point, No LAN is an island, why two IG(P)
>> protocols and no
>> EG(P) protocol?
>>
>> A NA should at least a some understanding of how to connect to
>> the
>> outside world - when to use BGP and when not to
n Zone.
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Reimer, Fred
>Sent: 09 September 2003 22:03
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
>
>
>I guess my expectation and Cisco&
subnets could be
> formed from a block - the all zeros and all ones subnets were not counted.
> Does this still hold with the new curriculum?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tom Lisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:54 PM
> > T
: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
>
>
> We are now teaching VLSM/CIDR in the CCNA curriculum.
>
> Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
> Community College of Southern Nevada
> Cisco ATC/Regional Netwo
not tell them that it is grown up stuff and they will learn
***more*** about it later - Just give them an overview.
Just my 0.02 GPBs
Dom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 September 2003 00:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help
.org
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 September 2003 23:37
> To: 'Reimer, Fred'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
>
>
> Oh, and while I'm on the s
about.
Best regards,
Dom Stocqueler
SysDom Technologies
Visit our website - www.sysdom.org
-Original Message-
From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 September 2003 23:37
To: 'Reimer, Fred'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work
Another way to look at it is that you have one long contiguous line of
addresses
that you need to break up into different size groups that must also be
contiguous.
For example: 192.168.1.0 /24
Assume we need three networks (nets a&b) with 40 hosts, two networks
(nets c&d) with 25 hosts, and 3 net
Another way to look at it is that you have one long contiguous line of
addresses
that you need to break up into different size groups that must also be
contiguous.
For example: 192.168.1.0 /24
Assume we need three networks (nets a&b) with 40 hosts, two networks
(nets c&d) with 25 hosts, and 3 net
CTED] On Behalf Of
Reimer, Fred
Sent: 09 September 2003 22:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
I guess my expectation and Cisco's, or at least their current
expectations as listed on their web site, don't match then. By my
definitio
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Reimer, Fred
Sent: 09 September 2003 22:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
I guess my expectation and Cisco's, or at least their current
expectations as listed on thei
r rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: "Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits
We are now teaching VLSM/CIDR in the CCNA curriculum.
Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco ATC/Regional Networking Academy
"Cunctando restituit rem"
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Reimer, Fred wrote:
>
> No offense, but this is CCNA material.
Do they still teach
this message. If you are not the named
> recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy,
print
> or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
s message. If you are not the named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Aiello [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:
The key is that you must completely unlearn classful thinking. Forget that
you ever learned it. Completely ignore any prior classful subnet boundaries
that you were forced to memorize. It's all just one big IP address space
that you choose to carve up any way you like. As long as you do it correctl
, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
Rei
I was stuck on the idea that you could ONLY re subnet a remaining piece
of a subnetwork. And not apply a mask to the whole span of the total
available network. You can (unless I'm incorrect here) you just have to
watch out for address over lap neer your subnetwork boundries.
I think I got it.
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Reimer, Fred wrote:
>
>>No offense, but this is CCNA material.
>
>
> Do they still teach classful for CCNA, though? Perhaps the only thing
that's
> hard for him is that 192.168.24.0 has a mask of 255.255.255.0 in a classful
> system. Moving the prefix over to the
Reimer, Fred wrote:
>
> No offense, but this is CCNA material.
Do they still teach classful for CCNA, though? Perhaps the only thing that's
hard for him is that 192.168.24.0 has a mask of 255.255.255.0 in a classful
system. Moving the prefix over to the left of that classful boundary isn't
somet
-
From: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Please Help - CIDR - How the bits work [7:75050]
No offense, but this is CCNA material. If you are going for your CCNP, then
you should already have your CCNA and know
Here's a great resource:
pad
http://www.nanog.org/isp.html#cidr
scroll down to CIDR and download "Understanding IP Addressing: Everything
You Ever Wanted to Know" by Chuck Semeria
Looking at your specific problem - think in powers of two. 400 nodes is
greater than 256 but less than 512. Use /23 ou
No offense, but this is CCNA material. If you are going for your CCNP, then
you should already have your CCNA and know the answer. But anyway...
If you need a network with 400 hosts, the smallest subnet would have a /23
mask. So take the first part of your given network and assign it to that:
I get the same results as Marko, but this may lay it out so you (and
others) can see the development:
IP address = 32 bits
Network portion = 22 bits
Host portion = 10 bits
Total addresses for host portion = 2^10 = 1024
Start with 192.168.24.0/22
Focus on the 3rd octet (network_host): 000110_00
Let me give you a bit of a clue -
For the 400 hosts you will need a /23
200 hosts you will need a /24
50 hosts you will need a /26
50 hosts you will need another /26
2 hosts (for serial int - no ip un-numbered allowed )and for these you
will need /30s (/32s are possible but probably not what
> I have network number
>
> 192.168.24.0 / 22
>
> from this I need
> networks with
>
> 400 hosts
> 200 hosts
> 50 hosts
> 50 hosts
> 2 hosts (for serial int - no ip un-numbered allowed )
> 2 hosts
> 2 hosts
192.168.24.0/23 - 512 (400 hosts fit nicely)
192.168.26.0/24 - 256 (200 hosts f
Not much!
You can run 12.x code on the 4000s, but the semi-modern stuff like Fast
Ethernet and ATM modules started with the 4500 series.
Concerning the 4000, the maximum I have seen from the factory of the
EPROM chip type FLASH board is 8 Megs and RAM has always been capped at
16 Megs. Around Y2
I think my last post was a bit messed up.
try this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps5199/products_tech_note0918
6a008009486a.shtml
watch the wrap.
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: "Lee"
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 8:10 PM
Subject: Please help!!!
I forget where I got this but have a look:
Q: How do you distinguish a 4500 from a 4500-M and a 4700 from a 4700-M?
Does an -M version show up in show version?
A: There are two methods you can use to determine the 4x00 model:
1.Use SNMP and do an snmpget for the following mib att
Thanks Daniel, I've tried that already but still the same...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59051&t=58889
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
We're assuming that the console port is toast. Just in case there is some
life in it try the speed jumper on the motherboard. Watch the wrap:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps259/products_tech_note09186
a008009433b.shtml#band_reset
> -Original Message-
> From: R M [mailto:
good question ;-)... 'cause at that point I was testing my box as a pure
bridge (without IRB or CRB)...
I guess I'll have to replace the box.
Thanks for your answers.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58978&t=58889
-
Well if you had set any write snmp community strings you could try an
upload a config into the router that would allow you to get in via the
vty.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
I had a similar problem on my 2610 , I bought a smartnet package and got the
box replaced from Cisco .
Navin Parwal
""R M"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've been working a few hours with a 2610 when suddenly, boom!!, I lost my
> console connection, now it doe
I guess my first question would be how, after a few HOURS, there is no IP
address assigned and vty config? have you tried connecting from different
computers?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58951&t=58889
--
FAQ, lis
Thanks Peter for your help. That makes sense.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57287&t=57245
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure
Barry,
You can enable a trunk on the 3548, and create subinterfaces on the 3550 at
site A.
I don't know the exact configuration details about a 3550, but it should be
something like:
interface gigabitethernet 0/2
no switchport
!
interface gigabitethernet 0/2.10
encapsulation dot1q 10 -Origi
one last thing to note, is that mixed mode nm's (ie: have both wan and lan
capabilities) are NOT supported on the 2600's
-Original Message-
From: Ian Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:18 PM
To: Steve Boer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
As Steve pointed out, I had a brain-fart. The NM-1E2W does not work
with the 2600 series.
You can, however, get a NM-1E, or an NM-4E 10BaseT module for the 2600,
and then use its (the 2600) other WIC slots above the built-in
Ethernet/FastEthernet interfaces for WAN connectivity.
My apologies fo
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Steve Boer wrote:
> 1e2w's would be for use in 3600 series routers, and are NOT compatible in
> 2600's. They include 1 ethernet port and 2 wic slots. In these WIC slots,
> you can use any of the wics that are out there (wic-1t wic-1dsu-t1 wic-1b,
> etc etc), but are blank unt
The 1E2W Module refers to a NM-1E2W Slot module that fits into the
2600/3600 series routers... and it has an 10BaseT port integrated. The
2W refers to the fact that you could put 2 WICs (WAN Interface Cards)
into it, and if I'm not mistaken, you could put 2 WIC-2Ts into that
NM-1E2W Module.
It w
Here is a good starting point to read up on..
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/nm-e2w.shtml
NM-1E2W has an 'onboard' 10BaseT interface.. also, you have 2 WIC
options so you could install a WIC-1T or WIC-2T or a combination of
both..
hth,
Mark.
> -Original Message-
> From: L [mail
1e2w's would be for use in 3600 series routers, and are NOT compatible in
2600's. They include 1 ethernet port and 2 wic slots. In these WIC slots,
you can use any of the wics that are out there (wic-1t wic-1dsu-t1 wic-1b,
etc etc), but are blank until populated with modules.
hope this helps
(c
Clayton, please let us know what finally happened ?
Thx.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51564&t=51534
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and N
I got it... I forgot to change the access list...duh
Clayton Dukes
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
-=]-Original Message-
-=]From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of
-=]Clayton Dukes
-=]Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 3:39 PM
-=]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=]Subject: Please
Clayton-
The following excerpt from a web site posting found via Google.com...
It may be your problem, and has the answer...
"... Finally we need to specify a route onto the network over our
ethernet card. The command
# netstat -r
will list the current routes on your machine. You can remove
I suppose ip nat inside is configured on ethernet 1/0.
So as Priscilla states, try deb ip nat det to see what's going on.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51546&t=51534
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
NAT issue? Obviously there must be some NAT going on if you're using
addresses in the 10.0.0.0 network.
Priscilla
Clayton Dukes wrote:
>
> Having a bad day, could someone please help me figure this out?
>
>
>
> I have a secondary interface configured on my router:
>
>
>
> interface Ethe
conduit permit icmp any any
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Juan Blanco
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 9:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please help me with my new baby(Pix 501) [7:48760]
Team,
I just got my new baby Pix 501 (wow...h
You need to setup access lists for inside and outside traffic.
Assuming that you're just playing with this at home, only want to allow
established traffic into your network, and want to let all traffic out of
your LAN to the world, do something like:
access-list acl_inside permit ip any any
acc
Oh yeahI forgot to mention that if you want to ping the world from your
LAN, you'll also need to add an outside access list, like:
access-list acl_outside permit icmp any any echo-reply
access-group acl_outside in interface outside
Sorry about leaving that out of the first message.
Craig
Try removing the default routing statement from Gw2.bne cause that looks
like a potential cause.
Also, you said that the network statements you added were not in the routing
table for gw2.bne.
Can you also post a show ip route for gw2.bne?
Another interesting question is why gw1.bne doesnt see
Firstly, I must say thank you so much for getting back to me :-)
Sorry about this, but the network is actually like this:
Gw1.bne2 - Gw2.bne Gw1.bne MLS2 (cat
6500) - Avior (Linux)
|
|
|-
""Wallace Lee"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hunt,
> I guess you don't have the 203.147.154.0 route in the middle router.
> however, you have a
> defaut route in it. So, you will experience a routing loop. Check you
tunnel
> configuration as well. see the follow
I agree. Are you terminiating the tunnel on gw1.bne? Or do you have
another route from gw1.bne2 to gw1.bne? Becuase it looks like gw1.bne is
learning it's route directly from gw1.bne2. If you could include the config
from gw1.bne, it would help.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/f
Hunt,
I guess you don't have the 203.147.154.0 route in the middle router.
however, you have a
defaut route in it. So, you will experience a routing loop. Check you tunnel
configuration as well. see the following from u :
I have an OSPF connectivity problem. I have 3 routers as follows:
>
>
I seem to remember having a bit of a mare with similar. If you have no luck,
is using one of the async ports an option?
This is a working config from a 2509 using first async port:
line 1
autoselect ppp
modem Dialin
modem autoconfigure discovery
transport input all
stopbits 1
speed 115200
Please provide following output from client router:
show int atm
show controller atm
show diag
show run int atm
show ver
thanks,
rahul.
""xie rootstock"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> i have a client who bought our 155M atm service
>
> and the problem is the
Hi Lee,
if you can reverse telnet into the modem, try to reset the modem to factory
defaults with the 'at&f' command, that might help.
Regards,
Georg
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41010&t=41002
--
FAQ, list arc
Kevin,
Check out "local area mobility", it looks like it may fit your needs:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/lam/tech/lamso_wp.htm
HTH,
Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kevin Campbell
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002
You can do this two ways, either over a VPN or a WAN link over a tunnel
interface. The tunnel interface will probably be a little less overhead
nsince you don't need encryption.
""Kevin Campbell"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I work for a collocation and bandw
I'm not sure if this will help but here goes:
I used to work for a dotcom and we had to move our Datacenter from SiteA to
SiteB with 2 different address blocks. The problem you might say is if you
move the website what happens? Well we made a duplicate copy of the website
(minus the database) at
See comments inline. Basically, I think you need to explain your
restrictions.
My experience working with clients is that sometimes perceived
restrictions, i.e - "We CAN'T do that!", really aren't restrictions at all,
i.e. - "We don't WANT to do that because we really don't understand how it
w
On Jul 16, 11:56am, "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote:
}
} It sounds like you're trying to pass the CID test. You should have signed
} an NDA that says that you won't disclose questions on the test.
This reply isn't aimed at any single person, since several people
did the same thing.
The
I think Answer C mentions just one site, not multiple sites. It could be
done on a single router with a simple ACL that doesn't allow access to the
host that has the software. So, C is right.
How would you do Answer A with a simple firewall system? If you can answer
that, then I'll agree with
C. A firewall has the capability of blocking traffic from certain sites.
A. This is incorrect because the firewall cannot distinguish between a
SEC-filed Annual report placed on a public internet website and a
Work-in-progress-next-year's-Annual-Report placed on an intranet website on
the same
No, just wishful thinking.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""ko haag"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Any News on when Cisco may fix it? I was planning on take the CID test on
> Wednesday.
> Is there another test I could take to get the CCDP?
>
> Ko
>
> "Steven A. Rid
Any News on when Cisco may fix it? I was planning on take the CID test on
Wednesday.
Is there another test I could take to get the CCDP?
Ko
"Steven A. Ridder" wrote:
> With all these conflicting answers, it just proves my point that the CID is
> a crummy, poorly worded test. Don't give Cisco
With all these conflicting answers, it just proves my point that the CID is
a crummy, poorly worded test. Don't give Cisco the $125 until the fix it!
""Russ Kreigh"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I think A would be right, because C would not be a "simple" solu
I think A would be right, because C would not be a "simple" solution, ex.
they would have to maintain a list of unauthorized sites.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Love Cisco
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It sounds like you're trying to pass the CID test. You should have signed
an NDA that says that you won't disclose questions on the test.
This is one of those questions that you can most easily answer if you have
read the CID course materials. The Cisco Press book edited by Birkner won't
help
:
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: Please help me answer this question [7:36295]
> to me b and d are out of the running because they are looking to prevent
> people from modifying data, thats an application issue. So youre left
> with a and c. A seems to be a pro
Ask the question again...h
- Original Message -
From: Love Cisco
To:
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 7:15 PM
Subject: Please help me answer this question [7:36295]
> 1. Which of the following customers can probably meet their security
> requirements with a simple f
to me b and d are out of the running because they are looking to prevent
people from modifying data, thats an application issue. So youre left
with a and c. A seems to be a problem best solved by putting the info on
separate drives or devices, so I vote c. A case could be made for a
however, if
Hmmm
Clayton Dukes
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
(h) 904-292-1881
(c) 904-477-7825
#rm -rf /bin/laden
#kill -9 /bin/laden
- Original Message -
From: "Love Cisco"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:15 PM
Subject: Please help me answer this question [7:36295]
> 1. Which of the
Chuck,
I was thinking exactly the same thing!
John
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Chuck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I think you're a bad boy, and you kn
I think you're a bad boy, and you know exactly what I mean.
Chuck
""Love Cisco"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> 1. Which of the following customers can probably meet their security
> requirements with a simple firewall system?
> A. Company ABC wants to make
Thank you to everybody who responded to my earlier email.
I realize that a picture says more than a thousand words,
therfore I am supplementing my earlier questions with the
following scenario:
--
Here are my router configurations:
-
Can you send the config for this scenario ?
Nick
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30421&t=30297
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclo
Hi,
you need to configure dial-peers on your router, depends on what you want to
do.
1. if you need just to receive calls on your router, you just have to
configure
dial-peer voice # pots
destination-pattern #phone number
port #of port to which you assigned the phone number
2. if you need to ini
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
