greater than 1492?
Hope it helps.
Arjen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
David Armstrong
Sent: March 21, 2002 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3015 VPN Concentrator MTU's [7:39010]
Unfortunately the Netopia's MTU size can't
Sorry - the link is rather missing!
cisco.com/warp/customer/794/pppoe_arch.html
Arjen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Arjen Dragt
Sent: March 21, 2002 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 3015 VPN Concentrator MTU's [7:39010
I'm not quite sure exactly what boxes form the IPSec relationship. Are you
saying (a) the Netopia talks directly to the 3015 or (b) PCs (who would have
VPN Client software) on the LAN side of the Netopia are talking to the 3015?
When installing the VPN Client you are prompted to change the MTU
Gotcha. I always wondered why they developed Martini-draft VPN's on the
Cat6K without having layer 3 MPLS VPN support. It just doesn't quite make
sense to me. I guess it's just marketing hype. Cisco probably wanted to
get there somewhat shortly after Juniper announced availability of layer 2
of VPN's at the present time is as
a substitute for old-school ATM or FR, but what better way to do that than
to precisely emulate it with an L2VPN? RFC2547 proponents might try to
counter by touting the fact that their VPN is L2-independent, but that
advantage is largely negated by the extensive
- Original Message -
From: nrf
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: MPLS VPN [7:38749]
Personally, I think RFC2547 will be surpassed by L2VPN's (both kinds), at
least in the foreseeable future.
Couldn't agree more on this. I always fail to see how the 2547
and scalability reasons. I imagine service providers
would want as little to do with customer VPN routes as possible. Internet
access could be supported over logical trunked interfaces to the end user or
over physically seperate circuits as currently done with layer 3 VPN's...
Cheers,
-Michael
- Original Message -
From: nrf
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: MPLS VPN [7:38749]
Personally, I think RFC2547 will be surpassed by L2VPN's (both kinds), at
least in the foreseeable future.
Couldn't agree more on this. I always fail to see how the 2547
We have a 3015 VPN concentrator that I've connected to a vendor who has a
Netopia R9100 router with a DSL (PPOE) connection to the Internet. The
tunnel is fine but anything larger than ICMP dies. From talking to Netopia's
tech support the problem is that the Netoia R9100 with PPOE supports MTU's
Are you sure??? Last I checked the Catalyst 6K's only supported EoMPLS and
could not perform the function of layer 3 VPN PE. In fact I've been waiting
well over a year for PE code on the Cat 6K's and has of last month was told
by TAC it's still not available. If it is available what code
EoMPLS was exactly what I was referring to. The guy asked for PE
capability, but didn't specify what kind of VPN.
Michael Cohen wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Are you sure??? Last I checked the Catalyst 6K's only supported EoMPLS
and
could not
--
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38631t=38631
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone ever created a VPN using a cable modem and DHCP? I am assuming
that once you get the IP using DHCP it will not change for at least a month.
If it does change I realize reconfiguration is necessary, this is no big
deal for me. I know it is not possible with checkpoint 4.1
I use a cable modem in Holland and it never changes, but now I've said
that.. Best thing would be to request an address then you know for sure
Cheers
--
email me on : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sam sneed wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Has anyone ever creat
Are you doing VPN using a PIX s well? If so was the config any different
than a normal VPN config?
Patrick Donlon wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I use a cable modem in Holland and it never changes, but now I've said
that.. Best thing would be to
Does anyone out there know of any reports that compares VPN equipement? We
debating Cisco, Sonic and Netscreen.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38691t=38691
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
Found good article on
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/dynamicpix.html
to do this.
sam sneed wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Has anyone ever created a VPN using a cable modem and DHCP? I am assuming
that once you get the IP using DHCP it will no
Here ya go.
http://www.nwc.com/1306/1306f2.html
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN vs VPN [7:38691]
Does anyone out there know of any reports that compares VPN equipement?
We
CAN C6K ACT AS THE PE DEVICES
--
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38749t=38749
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
Yes
flight wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
CAN C6K ACT AS THE PE DEVICES
--
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38755t=38749
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
this in my testing. In
particular, a VPN used to tunnel IPX. I discovered that packet sizes of 1500
failed, whereas packet sizes of 1492 worked just fine. I don't recall where
the cutoff was. It may even have been 1498. So yes MTU can be an issue.
Yahoudi wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">new
Hello all,
My company currently uses CHeckpoint 4.1 for our mutli-site VPN. I wanted
to use to PIX 501 to connect my home network, which is using a cable modem,
to the corporate network via IPSEC or IKE. I downloaded the doc's form
cisco and checkpoint on how to make the connection.
Has
after some recent bad experiences with VPN across DSL, I began to wonder
about MTU sizes and their effect, particularly when coupled with off the
wall links or protocols.
OTOH, it could be that your VPN boxes don't like the latency across the sat
links. maybe you have your ak timeouts set too
Is it possible to access a Cisco VPN5000 Concretator from any vpn client
(for example Microsoft Windows 2000 Prof. VPN), or must I have the VPN 5000
client from Cisco ?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37883t=37883
You can Use Windows 2000 Pro. VPN client if you are accepting PP2P on your
Cisco 5000.
Brown, M wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Is it possible to access a Cisco VPN5000 Concretator from any vpn client
(for example Microsoft Windows 2000 Prof. VPN), or mus
Agree.
I used both, Concentrator is very impressive. Support
from Cisco TAC is great. Checkpoint VPN is good too,
but their support is horrible. And their licensing is
confusing.
Jim
--- Joseph Brunner wrote:
The checkpoint is the black sheep of the industry.
It is a poorly
documented, un
gets rid of the elephant,
(now taking up all the space in his
hotel room) ? You guessed it a MOUSE !. Moral of the story, they string you
along with different answers on each
call (so issues just go in circles), the licenses make the product too
expensive, while not as good at VPN tunneling
Hello,
I Have a following problem.
I have Cisco 1750 router with vpn ipsec tunnel to PIX ( Central Office)
I want to encrypt with IPSEC traffic to Central LAN, but I want traffic
destined for inerrnet goes through central PIX too, so I have to tunnel this
traffic ( e.g with IPSEC AH)
Now I have
:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: QoS fro VPN connection [7:37534]
Hello,
I Have a following problem.
I have Cisco 1750 router with vpn ipsec tunnel to PIX ( Central Office)
I want to encrypt with IPSEC traffic to Central LAN, but I want traffic
destined for inerrnet goes through central PIX
Hi all, my company is trying to look at the different VPN vendors out there
for a VPN solution. Has anyone any idea what criteria to look out for?.
For those people who have implemented a full VPN solution on a large scale,
how is the performance?. What product did you use. We are getting
Sincerely,
Patrick J. Greene
Information Technologies Enterprises, LLC
Visit our Managed Hosting Division at www.AlwaysWEB.com
-Original Message-
From: Emil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 4:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: QoS fro VPN connection [7
I use a few different VPN solutions, but my favorite is a Cisco 3000
concentrator and a Cisco 3002 Client...
The performance is so good, I am able to do very good voice from NY to
Malaysia over this VPN.
It is excellent!
Good luck,
-Original Message-
From: Victor Alegun [mailto
etc(dhcp info). What is weird is this, when
every client connects and they open the vpn client to see there client
ip address it shows the ip address as being 172.29.10.1 for every
client. But if I look on the radius box I can see that the each client
has a different ip address it just shows up
Hello All , I am having problems running over a fast satellite
connection. I do a speed test from the pc hooked to the satellite equipment
and the actual satellite connection is getting average 700k BUT as soon as a
slap on the ol watchgaurd vpn solution it and hook a computer to that the
speed
Group,
Has anyone used both concentrator 3000 and checkpoint vpn (either software
or hardware)? What are each's advantages and disadvantages? I am interested
in the following factors: Ease of installation and configuration, security,
manageability, reporting and logging, scalability, and pricing
later tonight. In the mean time, someone from the group who is feeling a
little generous with their time may have some additional insight on this. A
few questions for the more knowledgeable out there:
Can ISP equipment have an impact on VPN throughput?
Could packet size impact throughput (500
I haven't used both but I had to reply. I had set up a CheckPoint
SecuRemote VPN, the VPN package that came with CP 2000 on a Nokia box
and I have to say, it's not worth the hassle. CP tossed in the VPN
component as a selling point so they could say, Hey our firewall does
it all. I should
but the Cisco products always make me happy. I've set up a vpn tunnel
from a cisco router to a checkpoint firewall and it seemed like the person
on the configuring end of the checkpoint had a lot of problems with
upgrading software and technical support but that may have been a one person
scenario. I
I currently have a VPN tunnel setup between two external interfaces over
the internet with a branch and my main office. My isp is changing and I
am going to have to change the tunnel endpoint (peer address), here at
the main office. My configuration on the remote router looks similar
is CRYPTO MAP for contorlling the interesting traffic for the VPN
session.
brian wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I currently have a VPN tunnel setup between two external interfaces over
the internet with a branch and my main office. My isp is changing and I
and downloaded images that say
they support the IP/IPX/AT/IBM/FW/IDS PLUS IPSEC 3DES. Once I have
confirmed that I have the correct image loaded, I go to a # and make sure
it
understands 'crypt?' ... and it doesn't.
Can someone tell me an image that supports vpn functions on the 1750's? I
that supports vpn functions on the 1750's? I
have tried maybe 6 different ios versions and I am apparently doing
something wrong? If someone could tell me what image supports everything in
here IP/IPX/AT/IBM/FW/IDS PLUS IPSEC 3DES
...i would really appreciate it, but I would be happy with the vpn stuff
/ftunity.htm
Kevin
ME wrote:
IOS just started to support the VPN Client 3.x (as apposed to the older
secure client that only supports 95/NT) with ver 12.2.7T. I have not
been
able to find any information about it published on Cisco's public web
site
yet. Any idea who might be working
IOS just started to support the VPN Client 3.x (as apposed to the older
secure client that only supports 95/NT) with ver 12.2.7T. I have not been
able to find any information about it published on Cisco's public web site
yet. Any idea who might be working on the bleeding edge of IOS VPNs
12.2.7T never came out and is renamed 12.28T. Have you seen the following
URL :
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t8/ftunity.htm
Kevin
ME wrote:
IOS just started to support the VPN Client 3.x (as apposed to the older
secure client that only
Hi, I've a problem configuring the Movian VPN client on my pocket pc to
connect to a PIX VPN.
Anyone knows how to?
Thanks,
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36497t=36497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
Hi,
Can some one give me the advice that how we can configure PPTP on cisco
router and my centers can access the my network. We are using the win2000 at
client place and we are trying to have VPN solution for the user. So that we
can have the secure network.
Thanks and Regards
Message
Search Virtual Private Dial Up network config.. (VPDN)
Mahesh Hi,
Can some one give me the advice that how we can configure PPTP on cisco
router and my centers can access the my network. We are using the win2000
at
client place and we are trying to have VPN solution for the user. So
CCO web site has very good information on setting VPN connection (PPTP,
IPSEC), and also you need to configure RADIUS server or TACAS Server if you
dont wanna do the local authenticaion on router.
Mahesh wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
Can some one
Hi Stanzin,
See www.mplsrc.com/vendor.shtml for links to Cisco VPN configuration
information.
irwin
-Original Message-
From: Stanzin Takpa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MLPS-VPN requirements [7:35972]
Hi
Hi !
Can anybody know, what are the basic MPLS things that should be
configured there on the routers (backbone) before going for MPLS-VPN.
Thanks
Stanzin Takpa
Astracon,
6560 S Greenwood Plaza Blvd.,
Engelwood, CO-80111
USA
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
Stanzin Takpa wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi !
Can anybody know, what are the basic MPLS things that should be
configured there on the routers (backbone) before going for MPLS-VPN.
Thanks
Stanzin Takpa
Astracon,
6560 S Greenwood Pl
]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi !
Can anybody know, what are the basic MPLS things that should be
configured there on the routers (backbone) before going for MPLS-VPN.
Thanks
Stanzin Takpa
Astracon,
6560 S Greenwood Plaza Blvd.,
Engelwood, CO-80111
USA
Message Posted
Hi ,
I keep ketting these messages on my Cisco router. When these messages
show up the VPN goes down for a few minutes and then automatically fixes
itself after a few more minutes. Here's the message:
IPSEC (decapsulation):error is decapsulation crypto ipsec_sa_exists.
crypto-4-recvd_inv_SPI
I am having problems with clients, that connect to the pix, when they are
connected, they can´t go back out to the internet through the same pix
here is a part of the configuration
ip local pool heima 192.168.15.50-192.168.15.100
vpdn group 1 accept dialin pptp
vpdn group 1 ppp
You need to enable split-tunnel. This will require an access list
permitting ip from your internal network range to your vpn pool range.
Jay Dunn
IPI*GrammTech, Ltd.
http://www.ipi-gt.com
Nunquam Facilis Est
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Thanx for the information, can I use this with w2k clients connecting, or do
I have to use the Cisco VPN client?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35735t=35715
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
Is it possible to get the VPN 3000 Concentrator to authenticate dial-in
users using an internal Windows 2000 Active Directory, or is it only the
old Windows NT 4 Domain model that's supported?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35270t=35270
Johan Hjalmarsson wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Is it possible to get the VPN 3000 Concentrator to authenticate dial-in
users using an internal Windows 2000 Active Directory, or is it only the
old Windows NT 4 Domain model that's supported?
Messag
Hi there,
Have anyone out there configured the above with any of your customers or
clients??
I have this scenario over here, and need some advise.
vrf1 | | vrf2
S1/0 || S1/1
---
|Cisco 7206 |
Hi Cheeyong,
what is the output you get when you issue the command 'sh ip route vrf vrf2'
? I am thinking about adding a static route using the 'ip route vrf'
command. Go to the following link for the syntax of this command:
The 3000 VPN concentrators do encryption via software. The 3015 and above
models can use the Scalable Encryption Processor (SEP) hardware accelerators
to offload the encryption processing.
According to the documentation, the 3030 and above can use a programmable
DSP-based security accelerator
?
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The 3000 VPN concentrators do encryption via software. The 3015 and above
models can use the Scalable Encryption Processor (SEP) hardware
accelerators
to offload the encryption processing.
According to the documentation,
us depth). The best
stuff I've ever found on
TE is, ahem, Juniper course material.
But like I said, a decent intro book on the
subject.
Caplan M wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm reading it and so far I'm pleased with it. I
haven't got to
: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MPLS and VPN Architectures book [7:34792]
The book is all-right, it's not great. It's OK as an intro book to the
subject. Unfortunately many of the more complex topics in later chapters
are written in such garbled way as to b
I'm reading it and so far I'm pleased with it. I haven't got to the VPN
stuff yet though, but its given me a good grounging in tag switching and MPLS.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34837t=34792
--
FAQ, list
I've ever found on
TE is, ahem, Juniper course material.
But like I said, a decent intro book on the subject.
Caplan M wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm reading it and so far I'm pleased with it. I haven't got to the VPN
stuff yet though, but its given m
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MPLS and VPN Architectures book [7:34792]
The book is all-right, it's not great. It's OK as an intro book to the
subject. Unfortunately many of the more complex topics in later chapters
are written in such garbled way as to be almost unintelligible, particularly
some
message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm reading it and so far I'm pleased with it. I haven't got to the VPN
stuff yet though, but its given me a good grounging in tag switching and
MPLS.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f
This book gets very good reviews on Amazon. I trust the opinions here far
more however... what do you think of this book? Better ones out there?
MPLS and VPN Architectures: A Practical Guide to Understanding, Designing
and Deploying MPLS and MPLS-Enabled VPNs
by Jim Guichard, Ivan Pepelnjak
ISBN
Has anyone setup a PDA client to talk to a 3000 Concentrator through a
firewall ?? I'm having a few issues it may be related to the Firewall
traffic types allowed thru.
Anyone know if I should be using anything other than the standard ? - IKE
(udp
500) IPSEC (protocols 50 51)?
Thanks.
Try specifying the exact IP address of the PC from where you want to
initiate the Telnet session and not the block of IP.
Regard.
Oletu
- Original Message -
From: Dante Martins
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:50 AM
Subject: PIX: Telnet to inside through VPN [7:33589]
How can
Martins wrote:
How can I telnet to PIX inside interface from the VPN (I.E. from
10.128.128.0 telnet 172.16.3.252).
I have tried using telnet command:
telnet 10.128.128.0 255.255.255.0 inside but still no working.
Can you help me?
Dante
CONF MAIN PIX
PIX Version 6.0(1)
nameif ethernet0
Anybody having experience in MPLS VPN...Please write back, I need some help.
Thanks,
Stanzin
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33717t=33717
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Anybody having experience in MPLS VPN...Please write back, I need some help.
Thanks,
Stanzin
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33718t=33718
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Hello Stanzin,
what do you want to know ? Do you want to set up an MPLS VPN over POS or
over ATM ? Please provide specfics on what you are trying to build.
Regards,
Georg
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33730t=33718
How can I telnet to PIX inside interface from the VPN (I.E. from
10.128.128.0 telnet 172.16.3.252).
I have tried using telnet command:
telnet 10.128.128.0 inside but still no working.
Can you help me?
Dante
CONF MAIN PIX
PIX Version 6.0(1)
nameif ethernet0 outside security0
nameif
How can I telnet to PIX inside interface from the VPN (I.E. from
10.128.128.0 telnet 172.16.3.252).
I have tried using telnet command:
telnet 10.128.128.0 255.255.255.0 inside but still no working.
Can you help me?
Dante
CONF MAIN PIX
PIX Version 6.0(1)
nameif ethernet0 outside security0
You cannot telnet to the inside address from the outside even over a VPN
AFAIK. Just use SSH to the outside if you have RADIUS or TACACS. Otherwise
you'll have to SSH or Telnet to a host on the inside of the PIX and then
Telnet back in. So, if you have a router or switch on the inside
Try this link.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/471/Win_client.html
Joel Satterley wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sorry, should've made it clearer, I need to config a W2K workstation to
use
IPSec/L2TP without the Cisco Client.
NetEng wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
Sorry, already been there, I need to use it without a CA just pre-shared
keys. The MS docs are useless. Everything is the world according to
Micro-bloody-soft!
--
Joel Satterley
Senior Network Engineer
Sirocom Ltd.
NetEng wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Try
Check your input and output access lists on the interface,
add deny ip any any log keyword so that you can see what
traffic is blocked.
Sasa
CCIE #8635
Kevin Smith wrote:
All,
I am trying to connect to our HQ via Version 3.1 of Cisco's VPN Client. I
use reflexive access lists
I have a client behind he firewall that is trying to VPN using Cisco's VPN
client (5000 series) to VPN to a site on the Internet. Would I have to open
up anything on the firewall to allow it out. Currently everything is
allowing out but the connection can't be established.
Thanks.
Tom
Tom, have you trusted the VPN device from the site on the internet?...
Any natting going on just some ideas.
Tom Richs wrote:
I have a client behind he firewall that is trying to VPN using Cisco's VPN
client (5000 series) to VPN to a site on the Internet. Would I have to
open
up
, January 21, 2002 13:44
Subject: VPN and Cisco [7:32721]
I have a client behind he firewall that is trying to VPN using Cisco's VPN
client (5000 series) to VPN to a site on the Internet. Would I have to
open
up anything on the firewall to allow it out. Currently everything is
allowing out
255.255.255.255 0 0
access-group OUTSIDEACL in interface OUTSIDE
where:
OUTSIDEACL = number/name of your ACL created to apply to the external
interface
VPNHOST = Internet-visible address of the VPN authenticating device
VPNCLIENT-PUBLIC = Internet-visible address of your internal client
attempting to connect
It appears that when the Cisco VPN Client is installed on a computer with
Microsoft PPTP installed, the MS PPTP connection becomes exceedingly slow.
The computer is Windows 2000 Professional SP2.
Does anyone know of a workaround? Or do they have to be on separate
machines?
George
Message
I have a customer that has an ADSL line which uses PPPoE. They can establish
a VPN Tunnel, but the throughput drops to below 28KBS and the only packets
that seem to be able to traverse the tunnel are ICMP Pings. I was told that
there is a problem with establishing VPNs over a PPPoE ADSL
in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a customer that has an ADSL line which uses PPPoE. They can
establish
a VPN Tunnel, but the throughput drops to below 28KBS and the only packets
that seem to be able to traverse the tunnel are ICMP Pings. I was told
that
there is a
Hi All ,
I am facing a strange error , please guide me what I should do .
I am able to create a tunnel via dial up with VPN adapter from my
remote client which has Windows Millinieum to my Cisco Router which is in
my HQ , I have done the VPDN set up , but I am not able to authenticate
04, 2002 3:26 AM
Subject: VPN Error with Win2K server [7:30909]
Hi All ,
I am facing a strange error , please guide me what I should do .
I am able to create a tunnel via dial up with VPN adapter from my
remote client which has Windows Millinieum to my Cisco Router which is in
my HQ
Hi All,
I have just been able to solve the error which I was getting with
setting up the VPN using PPTP , the only error I was getting was for the
WINS and DNS settings which I have to add to the Cisco router . I was
previosly able to set up the tunnel , but not able to connect to the domain
Hi,
I want tp implement a VPN between 3005 VPN concentrator and Sonicwall
Tele3.Whether I can directly go with IKE configuration?Does anyone face any
problems while implementing the same?
Thanks.
Saj
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30798t=30798
successfull as much inbound as outbound?
I had success in configuring internet access and it4s working fine but
over IPSEC my users from the other side of VPN can not access my exchange
server using VPN. but they can ping it...
thanks.
Leonardo Borda.
Message Posted at:
http
IP protocol 50 and UDP port 500. If you are doing AH you also need ip
protocol 51.
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: Leonardo Borda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: question about VPN-IPSEC and NAT [7:30694]
Hello
I have a customer with an ADSL line which uses PPPoE. They are able to
establish a VPN tunnel over the DSL line, but they are only able to ping
through the tunnel. TCP, UDP and other higher protocols will not work. I
heard that there is an issue with doing VPNs over PPPoE ADSL. Does anyone
know
a wild guess, packet frag issues? Try to ping with larger packets to test
this..
Brian Sonic Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Bruce Williams wrote:
I have a customer with an ADSL line which uses PPPoE. They are able to
establish a VPN tunnel over the DSL line
This is a remote access vpn situation? If you can ping the server then we
can assume that the tunnel was set up correctly and it is not a situation
where IPSec protocols are being blocked. Try playing with the IPSec over
NAT setting on the client itself.
From: Leonardo Borda
Reply
am making , I am able to log on
with that same Lap top to the Ethernet of the Corp Hq and my policies on
Win2K DC permit me to log on via Dial up and VPN .
Any one else who has faced a similar problem , please help me out .
thanks,
--
Navin Parwal
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
Put in the vpdn local name vpdn source ip address, you also dont have the
HGW name configged as terminate from hostname.
hth
Nick
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30422t=30415
--
FAQ, list archives, and
801 - 900 of 1685 matches
Mail list logo
