Great. after september 30 this year I won't have a single
supportable box U Gentlemen. Are you going to give me new
laptops with my 9.1 distro? It wouldn't be a problem if I could manage
to get software that would last as long as my hardware... well... let's
see 8 years on Win95
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 13:25, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 16:15 -0500, et wrote:
I would not put bets on where to blame in either case,,, my [gag,,cough,
cough, choke] intuition makes me think of some weird kinda file corruption in
both cases, but SO is the only common
Hello
I have a MSI MS-6580 motherboard with 845PE chipset
The problem is that when mdk9 boots it gives me
PCI device 0:1f:1 was disabled because of resource collision
and because of that the computer behaves like a 486 when it comes about
reading/writing on the disks.
is there any patch for
On Tuesday 04 Feb 2003 9:15 pm, et wrote:
I would not put bets on where to blame in either case,,, my [gag,,cough,
cough, choke] intuition makes me think of some weird kinda file corruption
in both cases, but SO is the only common thread _that_ _we_ _know_ _of_.
FWIW, I abandoned OOo from 8.2
On Monday 03 Feb 2003 3:22 pm, mycal62 wrote:
hi ,
did you try looking in : file:/usr/local/netscape/defaults/profile
Only thing I could find.
No, I have to admit I didn't. I expected the profiles to be in home
directories or root for the installation. You could be right, this may be
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 9:03 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
Great. after september 30 this year I won't have a single
supportable box U Gentlemen. Are you going to give me new
laptops with my 9.1 distro? It wouldn't be a problem if I could manage
to get software that would last
I am getting these errors with 1.0.2, either RPM or from OOo.org Binary
with Gnome2. How can I get rid of them and actually use OOo?
Now it just promptly crashes after the gui loads up.
(gnome-panel:1856): Wnck-WARNING **: Property _NET_WM_NAME contained
invalid UTF-8
Window manager warning:
Win2k Load Balancing uses a virtual IP address for all systems that you want
to load balance with (multicasting?). Basically i have to 3 systems running
win2k server that i want to move to linux/unix. Is there away to do this?
All the info i have seen for multicasting is easily 4 years old for
hi,
I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled supermount, but when
I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't mount automatically
did I miss something here?
Thanks
Hans
--
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?
Hans Schippers
1LIC INF
UIA 2002-2003
Yes. Supermount is evil. This is the first thing i disable after an
install.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SainTiss
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 AM
To: MDKexpert Mailing
Subject: [expert] supermount
hi,
I've
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 13:03, Robert Wideman wrote:
Yes. Supermount is evil. This is the first thing i disable after an
install.
Rob
snipped Tofu ---
What a usefull post.
To the original Poster:
Have you the right fstab entries for supermount ?
Have you made 'supermount -m
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:05:59AM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
: On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 9:03 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
: Great. after september 30 this year I won't have a single
: supportable box U Gentlemen. Are you going to give me new
: laptops with my 9.1 distro? It
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 05:05 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 9:03 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
Great. after september 30 this year I won't have a single
supportable box U Gentlemen. Are you going to give me new
laptops with my 9.1 distro? It wouldn't
Well, I reasoned that way too when I first installed 9.0, but the docs
of the kernel-updates specifically mention supermount as being rewritten
and fixed...
Hans
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 13:03, Robert Wideman wrote:
Yes. Supermount is evil. This is the first thing i disable after an
install.
I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but this is what I
got in fstab now:
none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
dev=/dev/scd1,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,users 0 0
I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but to
no avail...
Hans
On Wed,
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:37 pm, SainTiss wrote:
Well, I reasoned that way too when I first installed 9.0, but the docs
of the kernel-updates specifically mention supermount as being rewritten
and fixed...
There must be some oddity about supermount, though. It works beautifully on
my box,
Microsoft have a 5 year time in which they support their product..
after that, all bets are off.. win95 has no new updates available, there are
some that were created when it was supported, but there are no new ones..
win98 has just about finished its support cycle, and when they kill it, they
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:41 pm, SainTiss wrote:
I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but this is what I
got in fstab now:
none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
dev=/dev/scd1,fs=auto,ro,--,iocharset=iso8859-1,codepage=850,noauto,users 0
0
Mine is
none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
Anne, am in a good mood nowhehe.
My problems is that when i want to eject the cdrom i cant do it b/c it auto
mounts with supermount when i told it not to. Also certain apps require
cdrom NOT mounted...then supermount takes command, AAA.
This is just my frustration with it, doesnt really
Mine with supermount -i disable used after install.
/dev/scd0 /mnt/cdrom auto
codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,noauto,nosuid,ro,umask=0,user,nodev 0
0
/dev/scd1 /mnt/cdrom2 auto
codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,noauto,nosuid,ro,umask=0,user,nodev 0
0
/dev/fd0
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 13:46, Anne Wilson wrote:
Mine is
none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850,umask=0 0 0
Maybe that 'user' is significant? It certainly works for me.
I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:50 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
My problems is that when i want to eject the cdrom i cant do it b/c it auto
mounts with supermount when i told it not to.
Tell me more - you're umounting from c/l I take it? I have noticed that
sometimes it can get picky (I'm
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 12:58 pm, SainTiss wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 13:46, Anne Wilson wrote:
Mine is
none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,--,user,iocharset=iso8859-15,codepage=850,umask=0 0
0
Maybe that 'user' is significant? It certainly works for me.
I tried
I dont remember, its been awhile since i have used supermount. Once i
started having the probs a few months ago i disabled supermount after
reading an article somewhere stating that it has been badly written or
something to that effect that it is a non-worthy app. Personally i would
not like it
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work either...
Shot in the dark, Hans. I know some parts of this statement are
position-sensitive, but I don't know which ones. Try moving the 'user'
forward.
Didn't help either,
Didn't help either, but thanks for the tip...
this is what I did to get it working:
1) upgrade kernel and reboot
2) enable supermount in MDK CC
3) check that supermount is loaded with lsmod
4) put a cd in the cd-player
5) wait and see nothing happen
6) cd /mnt/cdrom2 and nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 07:41 am, SainTiss wrote:
I enabled supermount through the MDK control center, but this is what I
got in fstab now:
none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount
Hmm, wait a minute...
I think I figured it out:
I seem to be able to mount /mnt/cdrom2 without a cd being in the
drive... And from the moment that's done, it all seems to work... if I
insert a cd, its contents are correctly displayed, I can eject it
without unmounting, and I can replace the cd
music CDs do not get mounted, just played
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 08:09 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
I dont remember, its been awhile since i have used supermount. Once i
started having the probs a few months ago i disabled supermount after
reading an article somewhere stating that it has
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 07:53 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
Mine with supermount -i disable used after install.
/dev/scd0 /mnt/cdrom auto
codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,noauto,nosuid,ro,umask=0,user,nodev
0 0
/dev/scd1 /mnt/cdrom2 auto
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:03 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
Tell me more - you're umounting from c/l I take it? I have noticed that
sometimes it can get picky (I'm normally in gui mode) if anything is reading
the directory tree and may be reading the cds directory also. That just
means that
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:09 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
I dont remember, its been awhile since i have used supermount. Once i
started having the probs a few months ago i disabled supermount after
reading an article somewhere stating that it has been badly written or
something to that effect
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:42 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:03 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
Tell me more - you're umounting from c/l I take it? I have noticed that
sometimes it can get picky (I'm normally in gui mode) if anything is
reading the directory tree and may
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:21 pm, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
I love supermount. It works for me on 8.2 and 9.0. I have 2 cdroms (1
cdrom, 1 cdburner). My working entry for my cd burner on /mnt/cdrom2 is:
none /mnt/cdrom2 supermount dev=/dev/scd0,fs=auto,
in bios, turn plug and play aware OS to off
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 04:40 am, Birkoff wrote:
Hello
I have a MSI MS-6580 motherboard with 845PE chipset
The problem is that when mdk9 boots it gives me
PCI device 0:1f:1 was disabled because of resource collision
and because of that the
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:46 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
That fits with my experience. Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l you
tend to upset it. Closing all, as you say, usually does it. One variatioon
on your experience is that it may open and immediately close before you could
civileme wrote:
Well google around and you can find scdbackup which is oriented toward
650Mb
disks. And I have tested it to work on 9.0 with supermount disabled,
and a
$25.95(US) CDRW drive which is rated 4x4x24 Even with that, the drive
barfs
on CDRW media, even for blanking, with 9.0
DO
On Wednesday February 5 2003 03:40 am, Birkoff wrote:
Hello
I have a MSI MS-6580 motherboard with 845PE chipset
The problem is that when mdk9 boots it gives me
PCI device 0:1f:1 was disabled because of resource collision
and because of that the computer behaves like a 486 when it comes
I have noticed that Redhat, and M$ has lately published listing reguardiing
expected support cycles, and all of them are shorter than what most people
expect for manufactured products, but this is the way of things, and even
more so with computers, since the hardware is planned to be obsolete
You might want to consider OpenMosix (
http://openmosix.sourceforge.net/ )
..Once you have installed openMosix, the nodes in
the cluster start talking to one another and the
cluster adapts itself to the workload. Processes
originating from any one node, if that node is too
busy compared to
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 2:04 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
. One
variatioon on your experience is that it may open and immediately close
before you could possibly remove the disk. It then automatically mounts
the disk again, and you are back at square one until you've found what's
bugging
SCNR???
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 09:04 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:46 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
That fits with my experience. Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l
you tend to upset it. Closing all, as you say, usually does it. One
variatioon on your
I just tried playing an audio-cd, and that works fine as well...
Hans
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:28, SainTiss wrote:
Hmm, wait a minute...
I think I figured it out:
I seem to be able to mount /mnt/cdrom2 without a cd being in the
drive... And from the moment that's done, it all seems to
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:23 -0500, et wrote:
SCNR???
Sorry Could Not Resist
(if you were asking for the meaning)
A kind of preventive measure when you know you may get spanked for
what you did or wrote. Most important lifesaving sentence in marital
life.
wobo
--
If you don't
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 09:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:23 -0500, et wrote:
SCNR???
Sorry Could Not Resist
(if you were asking for the meaning)
A kind of preventive measure when you know you may get spanked for
what you did or wrote. Most important
google, linux virtual server.
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 03:42, Robert Wideman wrote:
Win2k Load Balancing uses a virtual IP address for all systems that you want
to load balance with (multicasting?). Basically i have to 3 systems running
win2k server that i want to move to linux/unix. Is there
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 2:27 pm, SainTiss wrote:
I just tried playing an audio-cd, and that works fine as well...
Sounds as though you're sorted, then. But - you told us how, now we need to
know why :) Anyone tell us?
Anne
--
Registered Linux User No.293302
Want to buy your Pack or
Also look at the media the drive supports. I had a SF 8x burner that was
VERY specific on which it would burn on...not in the documentation. Though
it was the 1st 8x burner out on consumer level in the US.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
The problem is the software manufacturers/programmers TRY to use ALL avail
resources the HW can supportincluding what the languages they are
writing in. If we could still create programs based on HW that is 5 years
old using programming languages (real ones like C/C++/Java, Basic, early
Sorry for coming in late.
I seem to be able to mount /mnt/cdrom2 without a cd being in the
drive...
Yes. once you have enabled supermount in the fstab, you have to call
mount /mnt/cdrom2 to actually activate it.
And from the moment that's done, it all seems to work... if I
insert a cd,
That fits with my experience. Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l
you tend to upset it. Closing all, as you say, usually does it. One
variatioon on your experience is that it may open and immediately close
before you could possibly remove the disk. It then automatically mounts
the
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 16:02, et wrote:
in bios, turn plug and play aware OS to off
I don't have this option.
I am now trying to install the newest kernel from the cooker as Tom
Brinkman advised
--
---
Dragos Birkoff Dionisie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 12:40 am, Birkoff wrote:
Hello
I have a MSI MS-6580 motherboard with 845PE chipset
The problem is that when mdk9 boots it gives me
PCI device 0:1f:1 was disabled because of resource collision
and because of that the computer behaves like a 486 when it comes
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:33, Damian Gatabria wrote:
so that would mean I should just remove the noauto from fstab, and I
should be fine?
noauto is a parameter that means that this drive is NOT included in the list
when you tell the fstab to mount everything. for example, when you issue
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 03:03 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
Yes. Supermount is evil. This is the first thing i disable after an
install.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SainTiss
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:58 AM
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 1:40 pm, Damian Gatabria wrote:
That fits with my experience. Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l
you tend to upset it. Closing all, as you say, usually does it. One
variatioon on your experience is that it may open and immediately close
before you could
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 05:11 am, Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
civileme wrote:
Well google around and you can find scdbackup which is oriented toward
650Mb
disks. And I have tested it to work on 9.0 with supermount disabled,
and a
$25.95(US) CDRW drive which is rated 4x4x24 Even with
SainTiss wrote:
hi,
I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled
supermount, but when I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't
mount automatically did I miss something here?
Thanks
Hans
you need to reboot the computer after doing a 'supermount -i
enable' to get supermount to read the
On Wednesday February 5 2003 10:44 am, Birkoff wrote:
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 16:02, et wrote:
in bios, turn plug and play aware OS to off
I don't have this option.
I am now trying to install the newest kernel from the cooker as Tom
Brinkman advised
Well, if the latest kernel
Hey guys!
Is anyone using a Linux box with software as a load balancer between 2 web
servers?
If so what software?
I have been looking and have found:
http://www.turbolinux.com/products/tcs/index.html
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
Any comments?
Thanks in advance.
Dan
Want to buy your
If you would have read the archives i just asked this question 3 times this
week and got the LVS suggestion.
Have fun
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Belkie, Dan
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:35 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
I've tried everything. but the board comes with sound and lan on board.
i've disabled everything from the BIOS. it had nothing
activated/instalated but the video card. but it didn't work.
I solved the problem with the latest kernel from the cooker. now it
seems to work just fine (21-28 Mb/sec
That did the trick, thanks to Jack and the other people who
responded.
--chris
At 01:18 PM 2/4/2003, Jack wrote:
/etc/hosts.allow
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 11:00, Christopher Kolar wrote:
Hi. I recently had an 8.x box go up in flames, so I rebuilt it
with a
clean install of 9.0. I configured the
On Wed Feb 05, 2003 at 01:03:42AM -0800, James Sparenberg wrote:
Great. after september 30 this year I won't have a single
supportable box U Gentlemen. Are you going to give me new
laptops with my 9.1 distro? It wouldn't be a problem if I could manage
to get software that
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 12:32 pm, Alan Shoemaker wrote:
you need to reboot the computer after doing a 'supermount -i
enable' to get supermount to read the fstab file.
grin I think you can do a mount -a and get away with the same thing
without rebooting...
--
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 12:35 pm, Belkie, Dan wrote:
Hey guys!
Is anyone using a Linux box with software as a load balancer between 2 web
servers?
If so what software?
I have been looking and have found:
http://www.turbolinux.com/products/tcs/index.html
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 12:35 pm, Belkie, Dan wrote:
Hey guys!
Is anyone using a Linux box with software as a load balancer between 2 web
servers?
If so what software?
I have been looking and have found:
http://www.turbolinux.com/products/tcs/index.html
I haven't installed the kernel-updates, but I'm assuming that you turned supermount
off with the original kernel. If that's correct, have you turned it back on
(supermount enable or whatever the actual command is). Just updating the kernel won't
automatically turn it back on for you.
Joeb
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 5:17 pm, civileme wrote:
I will beat on tape for backup. MY tape drive faithfully backed up once a
week and I rotated 6 tapes to stay current. (MAC fileserver 80).
Then one day I arrived at work to find the fileserver unresponsive. I
eventually powered down and
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 07:39 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
There must be some oddity about supermount, though. It works beautifully
on my box, yet others have endless problems. Of course, it may be that
other customisation/choices are affecting it - don't know about that.
Anne
Ditto here,
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 6:24 pm, Vincent Danen wrote:
On Wed Feb 05, 2003 at 01:03:42AM -0800, James Sparenberg wrote:
Great. after september 30 this year I won't have a single
supportable box U Gentlemen. Are you going to give me new
laptops with my 9.1 distro? It
On Wed Feb 05, 2003 at 06:44:05PM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
Great. after september 30 this year I won't have a single
supportable box U Gentlemen. Are you going to give me new
laptops with my 9.1 distro? It wouldn't be a problem if I could manage
to get software that
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 19:08 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
Talking of which - do you know any site with information on the different
grades of media, with regard to lifespan. I'm careful with storage, but I'm
aware that the media I'm using are not really suitable for longer storage. I
just
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 8:12 pm, Vincent Danen wrote:
That's what MandrakeSecure, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
list, updates for newer distribs, are all for.
Put it this way: Subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (you should
already be subscribed if you care about security anyways)... you will
Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 12:32 pm, Alan Shoemaker
wrote:
you need to reboot the computer after doing a 'supermount
-i enable' to get supermount to read the fstab file.
grin I think you can do a mount -a and get away with
the same thing without rebooting...
civileme wrote:
Then one day I arrived at work to find the fileserver unresponsive. I
eventually powered down and found the disk would not boot and enough of it
was corrupted to make the rest inaccessible. OK no problem, data is on
tapes, let's reload OS--- done reach for tape
Oops--tape
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 9:48 pm, Luca Olivetti wrote:
civileme wrote:
Then one day I arrived at work to find the fileserver unresponsive. I
eventually powered down and found the disk would not boot and enough of
it was corrupted to make the rest inaccessible. OK no problem, data is
on
Anne Wilson wrote:
That's what the verify feature of your backup program is there for.
It take twice the time and it'll probably cause more wear and tear on
the tape but at least you'll know the tape is readable.
'Fraid not. I was running backup with full verify, but it still didn't stop
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:00, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 9:48 pm, Luca Olivetti wrote:
civileme wrote:
Then one day I arrived at work to find the fileserver unresponsive. I
eventually powered down and found the disk would not boot and enough of
it was corrupted to make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim C wrote on Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:11:23PM -0800 :
I am stuck at the rpm install. I think I probably have a macro wrong
somewhere. Note that jim is a local user with home directory named
/lclusr/jim.
[jim@enigma jim]$ rpm -ivh
SainTiss wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:58:18PM +0100 :
hi,
I've just installed the kernel update, and enabled supermount, but when
I insert a cdrom, it still doesn't mount automatically
did I miss something here?
Paste your /etc/fstab. Paste the results of 'mount'. Paste the results
of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anne Wilson wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:46:54PM + :
I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but to
no avail...
I couldn't figure that one out either.
The options that come before the -- are for supermount
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anne Wilson wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:39:49PM + :
Well, I reasoned that way too when I first installed 9.0, but the docs
of the kernel-updates specifically mention supermount as being rewritten
and fixed...
There must be some oddity
From: Luca Olivetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You just scared me to death.
I had no problem reding the tapes to restore some files from time to time
(when a user deleted them by mistake), but I guess murphy's law applies
here: in case of disaster the tape won't be readable :-(
Absolutely! That's the
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 10:31 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anne Wilson wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:46:54PM + :
I'm not sure what the -- is doing there, so I tried removing it, but to
no avail...
I couldn't figure that one out either.
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 10:16 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
After using and selling Enterprise IT products and services for nearly
ten years, I do not trust any backup solution as far as I can throw the
media. They all more or less suck, and exist purely to give a false
sense of security and we did
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 10:39 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
Yet in spite of all that, I still could not bring myself to trust a system
that rejected its own tapes with such regularity.
I would just add that no-one laughed or complained again at my paranoid backup
strategy.
Anne
--
Registered Linux
On Wed Feb 05, 2003 at 08:23:57PM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
That's what MandrakeSecure, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
list, updates for newer distribs, are all for.
Put it this way: Subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (you should
already be subscribed if you care about security anyways)...
[cnip]
I will beat on tape for backup. MY tape drive faithfully backed up once a
week and I rotated 6 tapes to stay current. (MAC fileserver 80).
This is how all tape backup sucks stories start.
Then one day I arrived at work to find the fileserver unresponsive. I
eventually powered down
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
daRcmaTTeR wrote on Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:08:29PM -0500 :
I'm not mad. I'm just trying to increase the SNR of this mailing list.
Ok...but whats SNR?
Maybe I should have written S/N Ratio instead. It's an acronym for
Signal to Noise Ratio.
Thanks but I got this one already. Now I am trying to fight my way
through the spec file. Know of any place where there are docs on these?
Jim C.
Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim C wrote on Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:11:23PM -0800 :
I am stuck at the rpm
Hi,I'm tring to install ksensors but got dependance error on
libGLcore.so.1.
I've looked around the MDK9 cds but didn't found anything.
Can someone tell me what's wrong?
TIA
Evaristo
--
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas.
Experience the convenience of buying
I'm a CPA in my real life and I decided to go with
removable hard drives for our office network.
I just setup a mandrake server and use samba to backup
up the NT fileserver right on to the removable hard
drive. I have a set of shell scripts that mount the
NT fileserver directories and cron
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, drake wrote:
[root]# ip rule list
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
Dump terminated
[root]# ip rule ls
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
Dump terminated
Now what do I do?
Drake,
what the heck it is? I've never heard of it, but i only get three lines
returned
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 06:17 am, SainTiss wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:08, Anne Wilson wrote:
I tried changing users to user, but that didn't make it work either...
Shot in the dark, Hans. I know some parts of this statement are
position-sensitive, but I don't know which ones.
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 03:40 pm, Jim C wrote:
Thanks but I got this one already. Now I am trying to fight my way
through the spec file. Know of any place where there are docs on these?
Jim C.
Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim C wrote on Tue,
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 20:50, Lorne wrote:
5) wait and see nothing happen
6) cd /mnt/cdrom2 and nothing happens...
Ummm I know this is a terribly stupid question but did you do an ls
/mnt/cdrom2? The supermount stuff is black magic and I don't think I like it
at all, but for me I have
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Seth Zirin wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 09:59, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
I REALLY need some fast help with a simple statistics question but I am not
real strong on statistics. I have a question regarding Fisher's exact: is it
a legitimate test to run on a
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, et wrote:
I take responsibility for posting OT on the list. I would do it again but
perhaps in doing so I should have specified an off-list, direct reply to me
rather than in the list. Newsgroups are sometimes too slow and I needed
info ASAP (like within an hour or
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
