On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate the Apache Jena podling from Apache
Incubator to be a top level project.
+1, binding, mentor
cheers!
- Leo (doing a little celebration dance)
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Paolo Castagna
castagna.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
here is a vote on a release for Apache Jena LARQ module:
jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating.
...
Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area:
(dropped infra@)
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm exceedingly sorry here that the IPMC as a whole let you down by
not turning into these issues and dealing with them at the outset.
Me too.
Personally, I have no objection to including mutant
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like I wasn't clear enough.
The proposal is for the following release artifacts:
(1) A source-only tar
(2) A source+binary dependencies convenience tar
(3) A binary tar
This is instead of:
(1) A source-only
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Personally, I agree with Roy. Perhaps it might seem a little odd to include
the text of e.g. the GPLv2 in one of
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's decouple this thread from the specific issue of the ManifoldCF
release. There's a long tradition of Apache releases like the ones
ManifoldCF is producing, so turning this suddenly into a blocker is
IMHO bad
+1 from me.
Can we get 2 more IPMC votes?
(Checked KEYS, signatures, LICENSEs, NOTICEs, license headers. Built
source release, watched maven download the internet. Ran compiled
source and binary distribution and played with web interface. Almost
remembered how to write SPARQL. Etc. All looks
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Can we get 2 more IPMC votes?
On a related note, who are currently mentoring Jena? The status page
[1] doesn't show.
The Jena team page [2
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for
this release.
+1 from me.
cheers,
Leo
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Billie J Rinaldi
billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote:
Please vote on recommending the graduation of
Apache Accumulo with the following resolution to
the ASF Board.
+1 from me.
Well done, that was pretty fast :)
Is it right that your PMC roster doesn't have apache
Hey hey,
Jukka this is sounding so timid :). You know, I think I'll break rank
and tell you what I really think. You may want to sit down first.
You [1] did a *kick ass* job on the last report. Kick. Ass. [2]. Kapow!
As well as spending the time to look through and digest it all
beforehand
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Leo, are you out there?
Hmm? Oh, this again...
Having company names or trademarks in java namespaces is a pretty
stupid convention. It gets us mess like this...
There is no policy that incubating java projects must
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for
this release.
+1 from me.
(justification:
1) I do not consider unintuitive
(back from holiday, still catching up, just replied on jena-dev, but
for the record since this is a [VOTE]...)
On 8 February 2012 13:03, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC
Hey folks,
TL;DR
Small steps! Less friction! Lazy consensus! Reversible change!
Meritocracy! YAY :-D
History
Use small reversible steps is a powerful idea when evolving things,
like when evolving a software architecture. It's an idea that was made
popular @ apache by
+1
- Leo
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
In the interest of moving the current discussion matters forward, please VOTE
on this recommendation to the board by the IPMC. I'll leave the VOTE open
for at least the next 72 hours:
[ ]
+1
I'd also suggest that the below is a partial answer to the board's
questions to the IPMC on how it would improve oversight so it should
probably go in our report.
cheers,
Leo
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Sam
Hey folks,
I just wanted to chime in with a +1 for the general direction. I think
there's actually a lot of work to do to iron out how to reorganize
things. Before digging in, I suggest we abstract out a little bit to
see if we have consensus on the overall goals and desired end state
before
Hey Robert,
Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work! I like the word
picks, flow and style of this guide a lot. There's a lot to read here
and some new stuff to learn for me -- I confess I've been ignoring as
much about trademarks as I can until a time comes up when I actually
have a need
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Hey folks,
I started writing this e-mail in November or so. My normal approach
with stuff like this is wait for a non-contentious quiet period before
starting a new thread, to maximize the chance the words will be read
for what they say rather than interpreted in the context of some
heated
Hey Don,
Thanks for your reply. You are quite right, of course. I hope I am
also right at the same time :-). Maybe I can clarify...
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Like Apache, But Sexier...LABS? I can totally see that. Anyone want
to start an Apache
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
snip/
We may also have semantic gaps. Leo's [RT] may be presuming that a
podling's board report[sic] is merely a bureaucratic requirement.
snip/
Hmm :-)
And so the threads collide...
...I guess I'll allow it. But since
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
If there is a community
and that community doesn't want Apache to fork the code that they created,
then we will not fork that code at Apache. If the original developers of the
code do not want their license changed,
Hey hey,
(Pff. I like replying in-line but this is a hard e-mail to reply to
in-line so I will top post.)
If I understand your policy question: will apache allow an incubating
community to show up and start a project when they are forking another
project?
I'd say, in general, yes, probably, if
Hey folks,
I felt I had to take a look at this. Like Ralph I was very concerned
when I saw Ethan's e-mail. Thanks a lot for writing it Ethan, and
thanks for writing it with so much detail.
I just read all the e-mail about bloodhound I could find (that I had
pretty much ignored when I saw other
Hey folks,
I had to think about this a bunch. We don't have anything like this at
apache today.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 15:30, Raju Bitter rajubit...@googlemail.com wrote:
(..) Adobe Flex is quite different from most Apache
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project.
Here's a link to the proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal
Pasted inline:
= Apache Flex Proposal =
== Abstract ==
Apache Flex is an
*bump*. We have 2 +1s from mentors already, so at a minimum we need
just one more binding vote to do this release. Anyone have time to do
the review?
thanks!
Leo
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following as
Apache Jena
Yupyup. I thought I'd add a little background rant here, that I wrote
for the jena podling a bit ago. Purely optional reading but maybe
illuminating for some.
cheerio,
- Leo
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Benson Margulies
Hey hey,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
+1 binding. Given the sheer number of committers involved in this podling
there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent development community
out of the group. While I am optimistic, I am reminded
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
+1 from me (binding).
cheers,
Leo
+1 and welcome on board.
cheers,
Leo
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Flume for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to Flume incubation
[ ] -1 Reject Flume for incubation
...
= Flume - A Distributed Log Collection System =
== Abstract ==
+1!
cheers,
Leo
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
30 downloads per day or per month?
52TB per month is still a lot...
per day.
Look at this chart:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/marketing_bouncer.html
TL;DR: these bandwidth numbers are not actually that
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:58 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Since this is a large download, I wonder whether the quoted numbers are
impacted at all by timeouts, abandoned downloads attempts, etc. In other
words, is it counting the HTTP GET's? Or the successful downloads? That
may
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Just remember, we haven't yet even voted on whether or not to accept
the podling.
These are decisions the podling should be making.
Are you ready to call for a vote? :)
Whoah! Please don't call for a vote -- I would much
Hey hey,
I definitely understand the reasoning. Hmm. I think the way to look at it is,
it depends, but do whatever is needed to allow apache liberal rights to
sublicense all the IP to it's users.
The second way to look at it is that logic and legal stuff are not always as
closely connected as
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a bit up to my eyes in OpenNLP. Can one of you get the initial
status page going?
On it.
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hey folks,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
I think of a CCLA as a combination of an SGA to cover the software grant
plus an acknowledgement that people in the company are going to work on
Apache projects, whether on their own time or company
+1 obviously!
- Leo
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 binding
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
Lacking a lot of binding votes...
+1 binding
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Ross Gardler
On 4/22/10 10:21 AM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
I updated the proposal to reflect the objections regarding the
infrastructure. Our questions regarding the import of our SVN history
has been cleared.
Are there further comments, suggestions, objections?
Very nicely written proposal, well done! Looks
On 4/15/10 10:42 PM, Tom White wrote:
I would like to propose Whirr as an incubator proposal.
Whirr will be a set of libraries for running cloud services, such as
Hadoop or Cassandra. The initial code (for Hadoop) is hosted as a
Hadoop contrib module, but I believe it would flourish as its own
+1
- Leo
On 2/12/10 4:08 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
Hello all,
I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for
Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been
handled, I believe. So with that said, I am unaware of any potential
showstoppers, and would
On 1/26/10 6:00 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote:
Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent
to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and
has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept
On 1/14/10 11:41 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
I would like to start an official vote to recommend the graduation of
Apache Shindig as a Top Level Project to the Board.
+1!
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hey folks,
The incubator is here to help. It is about education. It is about
teaching podlings how to work here at apache, about showing people what
to be aware of.
The incubator is *not* here to assess or judge or dictate or lecture or
draft policy or go on long rants about The One True
On 12/11/09 1:14 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I would like to present an incubator proposal for a new Validation
podling, which would be a JSR-303 Bean Validation follow-on to the
existing Apache Commons Validation 1.x project, but based on a new
incoming codebase with a software grant from Agimatec
Heya OpenCMIS folks,
Since it looks like you aren't currently supported by a champion or
mentor [1], I thought I'd fill in a small part and inject some warm
fuzzies...
*Thanks* for open sourcing your project and *thanks* for considering
doing it at apache. Its always a lot of effort to go
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
this is also the case for Nightly Builds, accessible by the
public; Legally they are publishing to the public (i.e. opposite of
'for private use') and bound by licenses and agreements.
And finally, from Copyright law
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
Todd Volkert wrote:
Does anyone on this list know of an existing open source pure-Java Advanced
Audio Coding (AAC) library? If not, are there any audiophiles on this list
that would be interested in incubating such a project
Hey hey,
I wasn't going to say anything but since this is dragging on...
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Would we permit someone to mirror other files from trunk on the website?
Yes, definitely. Most projects publish their websites by pushing files
into
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Ross Gardler
ross.gard...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/12/1 Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com:
On http://incubator.apache.org/wookie/ is it possible to add somewhere that
the original development was funded by the European Commission through the
Hey hey,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Josh Thompson josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu wrote:
The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to
publish this release.
The release artifact, sums, and
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
As Hyrum suggests, we can use org.apache.subversion.* if we want to
create a new (better) Java interface within our versioning rules - but
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
Apache Pivot top-level project.
+1 from me!
cheers,
Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hey hey,
I've checked in on Pivot now and again and reviewing recent
activities, I think its definitely ready to leave the nest! I will be
happy to vote +1 when it comes to a vote.
cheers,
Leo
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
The feeling among the
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Matthieu Riou matth...@offthelip.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
As Martijn alluded to, I think we'd need some more context as to why and
how they use RTC.
Yes, sorry for the lack of details. The context is
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
There are two other issues to discuss for the Subversion podling:
* moving the mailing lists directly to @subversion.apache.org
* placing the source code at /subversion/ rather than /incubator/subversion/
We are hoping to
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:23 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
Sponsors
* Champion: Greg Stein
Cool
* Nominated Mentors: Justin Erenkrantz, Greg Stein, Sander Striker, Daniel
Rall
Once again, caution against committers == mentors (== 'project
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:07, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Here's what I understand:
1) Apache rule: all apache releases must be made by PMCs
2) Apache rule: a release needs at least
+1, nice work folks!
cheers,
Leo
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.2. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a
+1 from me!
cheers,
Leo
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas Gallardo
nickgalla...@yahoo.com wrote:
The Wink community has voted on and approved the release
of Wink 1.0 (RC-5). We would now like to request the
approval of the Incubator PMC for this release.
Details of the Wink
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
PS: +1 to start incubation obviously. The record is 2 weeks set for
MerlinDeveloper back in 2003...you have 9 days left to try and beat it
Hey, you
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Incubator is about EDUCATION. It is about TEACHING podlings
how to work here at Apache.
So what are you teaching with e-mails like this, Greg?
When you disagree with someone, SHOUT a bit and write a long rant?
Or
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo nlgal...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Thanks Leo, your input is much appreciated.
In addition to this +1, we received a +1 from Kevan Miller in the Wink
community vote. Is that vote transportable here? If so, then we just need one
more +1 to release
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
To be clear, it's on the mentors to decide what is applicable and
necessary for graduation - not the IPMC as a whole. The IPMC as a
whole has only two roles: approving a proposal and recommending
graduation
Also,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Also, to be clear, as an IPMC member I spend quite a bit of time with
projects where I am not a mentor, casting (binding) votes on things
like
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:16, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
...
Not merit, just binding vote. I agree that it sucks, but it is not
something where the incubator has gone awry, it has _always_ been
messed up like
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 14:44, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
All of the existing tags/branches of svn use a tweaked Apache Software
License, v1.1, and generally have a file header claims a copyright by
CollabNet.
trunk is
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
I would like to propose incubating the existing Libcloud project to join the
ASF
Cool! I will try to make the time to help out a little; I'm interested
in this space :)
cheers,
Leo
Yo. Looking pretty cool! Sorry, but, few tidbits inline...
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
nlgal...@us.ibm.com wrote:
The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 1.0. We
would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this
release.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Bryant Luk bryant@gmail.com wrote:
The source release has a LICENSE and a NOTICE file that indicates it
contains a bunch of stuff it does not actually contain. AFAICS it
should simply have a LICENSE that is just the Apache License and a
NOTICE file that has
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Bryant Luk bryant@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the links. One general comment I have is that I understand
this is part of the incubation process (and no offense intended to Leo
since obviously taking energy and time for this) but if I can't look
and see if
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
I'm curious though, when you say ...which makes me whinge just enough
to not give a +1, is that hypothetical, or is there feedback that we
could
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
After much thought, I am
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 08:52 +0100, sebb wrote:
The source archive contains 3 files that are not in SVN:
Cli.tokens
CliLexer.java
CliParser.java
These are generated files.
Either store the files in SVN and release
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
I'm curious though, when you say ...which makes me whinge just enough
to not give a +1, is that hypothetical, or is there feedback that we
could incorporate so that you would actually vote for our release?
Nah, it means
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Francis De Brabandere
franci...@gmail.com wrote:
I added myself a while ago to the keys in our
repo/trunk/tools/KEYS.txt. Should we move that file to trunk and
publish it in the dist?
I would say so. The advantage of having the KEYS file also in the
/dist/ is
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
...
Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for testing?
If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in the binary
release.
Even if it is
(dropped cassandra-dev)
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with
putting an acknowledgment in the NOTICE file. (putting terms in the
LICENSE file
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Leo Simonsm...@leosimons.com wrote:
(dropped cassandra-dev)
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with
putting
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for
testing?
If so, then it should
be xoauth_public_key
- [SHINDIG-1107 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1107] -
Clean up shindig dependencies
- [SHINDIG-1135 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1135] -
Bump ehcache to 1.6.1
--
cheers,
Leo Simons
--
http://lsimons.wordpress.com
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jeremy Hugheshugh...@apache.org wrote:
We appreciate any feedback and comments on the proposal.
* Any chance of one or two of the other ASF members involved also
stepping up as a mentor?
* Projects that consist of groups of components often have some
problems
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Guillaume Nodetgno...@gmail.com wrote:
We have in this proposal a lot of people who are not felix committers and
who are not even apache committers at all.
They want to work on some code and create a community around it. The way
the ASF works means that the
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Greg Browngkbr...@mac.com wrote:
If I can attempt to summarize, there is a difference between the *concept*
of a leader and the *title* of a leader here at ASF (please correct me if I
am wrong).
Correct! You missed the rationale in the summary, though :-)
*
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
So who's going to do what about XAP?
I tried understanding the related threads, but I couldn't figure out
why it's so complicated. If it were up to me, I'd simply follow [1].
In fact, unless someone takes some action
Hey thrift folks,
Someone just pointed out
http://incubator.apache.org/thrift/download/
I'm afraid that's not exactly what we'd like to see. Can you
please spend some time reviewing the pages at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
? It would be really good if
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Leif Hedstroml...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
As you know, we've been preparing our proposal to submit Traffic Server to
the Incubator for a few weeks now. With the help from our champion (thanks
Doug!), and the entire Incubator community, it's my pleasure to submit a
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
If a community meets all the criteria, but hasn't discovered a new
committer (or two) by itself, is the community ready for graduation?
Potentially, yes. Likely, no :-)
If not, how can we—mentors— nudge the
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Ian Bostoni...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
...
Proposed release:
Hi,
We already got two new mentors signed up (thanks to your posts to the httpd
devel list I think). So, we're up to three now, how many do we need to be
considered for a vote?
3 mentors is usually considered enough :)
Is there anything else missing?
Nope, it looks like you have your ducks
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Todd Volkerttvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
The Pivot community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Apache
Pivot 1.2 Release Candidate 3. We would now like to request the permission
of the Incubator PMC to publish the artifacts on the Pivot download page.
On May 23, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Santiago Gala wrote:
Is it that we have identified a new issue that actually affects
_all_ Maven based releases, not just Shindig?
No not necessarily. You can use maven to produce binary releases that
have all the required legal details inside of them; it just
On May 25, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
The Sling podling has voted on asking the Incubator PMC to support its
graduation as a top level project.
Enthousiastically and confidently +1.
All the best!
- Leo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On May 21, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Upayavira wrote:
I am a mentor for Shindig, but I am aware of a weaknesses of mine as a
mentor is that I'm not that knowledgeable or experienced with the
release process at Apache, and therefore have not followed this thread
in detail, which I really should have.
It
]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
cheers,
Leo Simons
--
http://lsimons.wordpress.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 21, 2008, at 7:36 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Now that CouchDB has been brought into the Incubator, is there
anything that
the old TripleSoup project would have to offer?
Hmmmh? Like what?
TripleSoup code is mostly in C, for serving up triples, using an
apache module for HTTP/REST.
On Feb 17, 2008, at 4:51 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Most of the use cases mentioned so far for git, including some
where people are using it on top of SVN with ASF projects, run
counter to ASF principles.
Let me fix that:
Use case: work on apache project while on plane
1 - 100 of 405 matches
Mail list logo
