On 18/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Sebb,
The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree
contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
NOTICE or LICENSE.
IMO this is a blocker.
I
On 18/09/2009, Andreas Lehmkühler andr...@lehmi.de wrote:
Hi,
The PDFBox PPMC has voted to release version 0.8.0-incubating of PDFBox. The
release candidate is available for review at
http://people.apache.org/~lehmi/pdfbox/pdfbox-0.8.0-incubating/
See the attached original vote
Just noticed that the jar files in the zip/tar.gz archives are
identical to each other, but are not identical to the jar files in the
Maven repository - they have different hashes, for example:
tgz/zip: empire-db-2.0.5-incubating.jar:103bed94cfba5efe0d2c3d4e90e4c89a
Maven:
On 22/09/2009, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote:
Hi sebb,
we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since
everything but the timestamp in the manifest is equal and there is no easy
solution for having only one Maven build, we (and our mentors) considered
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to get to a formal consensus on the manifest date and this
url. Do we really need to fix those or are they non-issues?
Issues, but non-blocking.
On the site url and as Martijn mentioned I also think this is a NON-issue
2.0.5-incubating release.
Thanks,
The apache empire-db team.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to get to a formal consensus on the manifest date and this
url. Do we really need
register votes.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:50 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
The final result for our vote on the release of Apache Empire-db
2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
+1 votes: 4 binding
0 votes: 0
-1 votes
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
I see, that +1 was for the pinging of the maven guys :-)
Yes.
Did not realise at the time that using +1 there was ambiguous; sorry about that.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:31 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/09/2009
On 18/11/2009, Josh Thompson josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Incubator PMC,
The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to
publish this
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
more commonly supported.
IMO, this is a release blocker
Just curious why you
On 23/11/2009, Branko Čibej br...@xbc.nu wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a bz2 archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
more
On 23/11/2009, Josh Thompson josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not on the general incubator list but have followed the discussion for
this thread via the online archives.
There are two things I'd like to point out. I created the archive in
On 03/12/2009, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
We tend to update the api docs generated using doxygen and java doc on
a nightly basis.
Unreleased artifacts should be linked only
On 16/12/2009, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
...To my mind, the 'official' record of a PPMC membership _should_ be the
project's status page:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/$PODLING.html
Minotaur (people.apache.org) is currently down, see:
http://monitoring.apache.org/status/
S///
On 15/02/2010, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
On 02/15/2010 05:47 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
I didn't receive one.
Check your @apache.org e-mail. That is the address
On 11/04/2010, Martin Cooper mart...@apache.org wrote:
What is the current mechanism for getting the live web site to update
after committing the changes? There was some discussion of svnpubsub a
while ago, so at first I thought it might be magic, but nothing
happened. I waited an hour for
On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our second release,
0.3.0. As required by Incubator policy, we need IPMC approval for
this release. There is a concurrent release vote ongoing on
libcl...@incubator.apache.org.
The
On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our
On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 06/05/2010, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote
On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/libcloud-0.3.1/
Where is the KEYS file?
The directory structures of the bz2 and zip archives are different - the file
On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:48 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/libcloud-0.3.1/
Where
On 08/05/2010, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:48 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache Libcloud 0.3.1 are available at:
http
On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:48 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Test
On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Fri
On 08/05/2010, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/05/2010, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote:
IPMCers,
Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list.
I'm now calling the IPMC vote to release Wink 1.1 (incubating) per the
process indicated here:
:20)
at
org.apache.wink.server.internal.providers.entity.JAXBCustomContextResolverCacheTest.testCustomResolverCacheOn(JAXBCustomContextResolverCacheTest.java:197)
On 11/05/2010, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote:
IPMCers,
Wink 1.1
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks Sebb for your review,
I'll try to address each of your concerns:
1) AL headers are missing from...
These files list implementation classes like other standard
META-INF/services/* files. We may be able to accommodate and re
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote:
Sebb,
Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files,
the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just
confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in
wink
On 12/05/2010, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote:
Sebb,
Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files,
the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just
confirmed it again in my build
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@ohmyhead.com wrote:
Thanks Sebb,
Just to be clear, is this a minus 1 vote from you? If so, I'll roll it all
back and restart the process.
The missing AL headers would have been -1 from me, but as they cannot
currently be fixed that can be left
On 14/05/2010, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/13/2010 10:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Just curious. If a graduated project is sponsoring an incubation does
the podling *require* mentors? Isn't that the roll of the sponsoring PMC?
On 23/05/2010, Luciano Resende lrese...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache PhotArk team is pleased to announce the release of Apache
PhotArk M2-incubating.
http://incubator.apache.org/photark/photark-downloads.html
There are some problems with the download page:
- the download links for the
There's a lot of inconsistency in the various podling web-sites.
Seems to me that they should all clearly mention Apache and the
Incubator, and should include the Apache Feather, together with clears
links to the Incubator and ASF foundation sites.
Likewise, and download pages should use the
On 23/05/2010, Luciano Resende lrese...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 2:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/05/2010, Luciano Resende lrese...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache PhotArk team is pleased to announce the release of Apache
PhotArk M2-incubating.
http
On 23/05/2010, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
Some of them barely mention Apache and the Incubator:
http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/
No disrespect, but I find this example unfounded. If you go to that
website, you see a _huge_ font (and a feather) that leaves absolutely
On 25/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
Apache/Maven release process as documented at
On 26/05/2010, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On May 26, 2010, at 3:31 AM, sebb wrote:
On 25/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following
On 26/05/2010, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On May 26, 2010, at 2:00 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first
On 26/05/2010, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The staging site appeared to be part of the vote as it was not
specifically excluded.
This was a mistake - it probably should have been excluded. AFAICT,
staging
On 26/05/2010, Les Hazlewood l...@hazlewood.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way to
recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but thats
not enough as an ASF
On 26/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a bit confusing to have two copies of the NL files in the root
of the archive:
LICENSE and LICENSE.txt have the same content.
NOTICE and NOTICE.txt have
On 01/06/2010, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Apache Shiro Community,
We are proud and excited to offer Apache Shiro's first stable release
as an Apache Incubator podling!
Version 1.0.0-incubating is available immediately for download here:
On 01/06/2010, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
The download page links to reposity.apache.org.
However repository.apache.org is not to be used for direct
publication to end users, it is for publishing to the main maven repo.
This wasn't clear on the apache infrastructure
On 07/06/2010, Bryan Duxbury br...@rapleaf.com wrote:
Hi all,
The Thrift project has prepared a new release, version 0.3.0, and voted on
it on our dev list, where it's passed. I understand that I now need to get
IPMC votes from everyone to make it official.
The tarball can be found at
Also, what are Java scturcts ?
These are referenced in the NEWS file (which might be better named as
RELEASE_NOTES).
On 07/06/2010, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/06/2010, Bryan Duxbury br...@rapleaf.com wrote:
Hi all,
The Thrift project has prepared a new release, version 0.3.0
Ivy started out as an Incubator project with code in:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/
It is now an Ant sub-project with code in:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/
However the incubator SVN tree still has files in it
Something seems to have gone wrong here.
The following podlings appear to be retired or dormant:
juice - status says dormant
kabuki - status says withdrawn
wadi - status page has not been updated since creation as far as I can
tell; no updates to SVN since end of 2005
Should their SVN directories be made read-only?
Clutch could compare the directories under:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/
with the list of graduated podlings, and report a warning against any
that still have SVN directories.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Composer was abandoned, and its SVN tree is all but empty - can it be deleted?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/composer/
Only files are following in trunk:
.classpath
.project
Likewise, Lucene.net only contains a README file
Can it be deleted?
BTW
On 28/06/2010, Gabriele Columbro colum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC members,
this to vote is the first incubator release for Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS,
with the artifacts being versioned as 0.1.0-incubating.
The release has passed the Chemistry incubator PMC vote, see
On 30/06/2010, Ben Dewey ben.de...@26ny.com wrote:
Sebb created a JIRA ticket for us. I will repackage and return later for
another vote.
That JIRA has no bearing on the release, as it only affects SVN.
Otherwise I would have replied to the VOTE thread...
So long as the correct EOLs
On 13 July 2010 23:50, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a release of Apache RAT 0.7.
The distribution files (binary and source) are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherat-057/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.7/
KEYS
On 14 July 2010 21:58, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Following up on Bryan's mail, we'd like to complete a release of Thrift
0.3.0 RC5, and would like additional incubator PMC votes.
We have so far had one IPMC vote (mine) and four PPMC votes.
So, please take a look at:
On 16 August 2010 19:18, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Shiro community and the mentors of the project think the
project is ready to graduate and is asking for IPMC's recommendation
to present the project resolution to the board. The community
graduation vote was
On 16 August 2010 19:33, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 August 2010 19:18, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Shiro community and the mentors of the project think the
project is ready to graduate and is asking for IPMC's recommendation
to present the project
On 16 August 2010 19:18, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Shiro community and the mentors of the project think the
project is ready to graduate and is asking for IPMC's recommendation
to present the project resolution to the board. The community
graduation vote was
On 24 August 2010 02:50, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Many graduating projects trim their list of committers / ppmc members,
primarily because the list of initial committers rarely reflects the active
people on the project.
In your case just ask infra to remove the committer
On 24 August 2010 03:00, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Noel,
Adding me to the PMC didn't add me to the ldap group so that I could
update the web site. I opened a ticket, but sebb points out that this
was an act of lese majesty, and the request needs to come from you.
That's
On 8 September 2010 12:39, dan haywood d...@haywood-associates.co.uk wrote:
snip/
And another benefit of putting user traffic on the dev list is that
it'll give the devs exposure to any probs that regular users are having with
actually using the framework (ie so we can mature its
On 11 September 2010 15:08, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
It looks to me as if I asked Infra to list me as a mod under my apache email
alias, but of the actual 'from' that shows up is my gmail.
What
The login pats has not been granted access to the incubator/river SVN tree
This requires someone (normally the PMC chair, because they should
know if the request is valid) to update the asf-authorization-template
file.
See:
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess
On 14 September 2010
On 14 September 2010 15:13, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The login pats has not been granted access to the incubator/river SVN tree
This requires someone (normally the PMC chair, because they should
know if the request is valid) to update the asf-authorization-template
file.
See:
http
On 16 September 2010 23:55, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Gabriele Columbro gabri...@apache.org
wrote:
The vote is open for 72 hours.
The window closes tomorrow.
AFAIK the 72 hours is a minimum, not a maximum.
We're still one IPMC vote
On 28 September 2010 19:37, Josh Thompson josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Incubator PMC,
The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
VCL 2.2. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to
On 6 January 2011 16:10, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I am happy to provide clear-text versions of KEYS and CHANGES.txt if
that is what you require. I've just never seen any other Apache
project that did that.
All Apache releases require pgp signatures, and the KEYS file must
contain
On 6 January 2011 13:12, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
The Apache ManifoldCF community has voted to release our first set of
artifacts and now would like an Incubator vote. Since this is our first
release, extra attention to detail is appreciated.
You can find the
On 6 January 2011 17:34, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
The key should also be added to a pgp key server.
The key has already been added to the MIT web of trust - I presume
that is what you meant?
Yes, I meant that the key should be retrievable from a pgp key server
- which it is
On 6 January 2011 18:03, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 January 2011 13:12, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
The Apache ManifoldCF community has voted to release our first set of
artifacts and now would like an Incubator vote. Since this is our first
release, extra
On 6 January 2011 18:23, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions.
That's not what I said.
You can have a binary distribution if you wish, but there must be a
source distribution.
As I said before, it makes no sense to distribute
Where is the SVN tag for the release?
On 6 January 2011 13:12, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
The Apache ManifoldCF community has voted to release our first set of
artifacts and now would like an Incubator vote. Since this is our first
release, extra attention to detail is
It's quite difficult finding the resources for the Manifold Connector Framework.
The Incubator web-site is at:
http://incubator.apache.org/connectors/
SVN appears to be at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/
The Java package is
org.apache.manifoldcf
So the project currently
check
exactly what has changed between RCs.
Karl
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is the SVN tag for the release?
On 6 January 2011 13:12, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
The Apache ManifoldCF community has voted to release our first set
hopefully won't need to be changed either ...
Karl
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:17 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
It's quite difficult finding the resources for the Manifold Connector
Framework.
The Incubator web-site is at:
http://incubator.apache.org/connectors/
SVN appears
On 6 January 2011 20:41, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
The failure to build occurs because the directory it is complaining
about doesn't seem to exist after the zip is unpacked. The directory
is empty at the time of the build. It's not clear whether the problem
is the built zip
Just noticed that there are a lot of source files without AL headers.
The RAT tool can detect these for you.
Also, there should normally be a DISCLAIMER file at the top-level of
archives and SVN trees.
It's simpler to have this in a separate file, which can then just be
deleted upon graduation.
to have BOM markers - not sure
whether that is intentional.
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Just noticed that there are a lot of source files without AL headers.
The RAT tool can detect these for you.
Also, there should normally be a DISCLAIMER file at the top-level
Note: the NOTICE year will need to be changed for the next release to 2010-2011.
For the current release I think it can remain as is - there don't seem
to have been any substantive changes made in 2011.
The leading blank lines need to be removed.
Otherwise, I concur with what Ant has mentioned
On 8 January 2011 16:40, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I've attached a new proposed version of README.txt, NOTICE.TXT, and
LICENSE.txt. Any further comments?
As previously mentioned, all the files appear to have leading blank lines.
These should be removed.
The README file says:
point in further changes.
I still think the binary archive is unnecessarily bloated, and will
cause wasted load and resources for mirrors and consumers.
Thanks,
Karl
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 8:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 January 2011 16:40, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I've
On 9 January 2011 08:14, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I still think the binary archive is unnecessarily bloated, and will
cause wasted load and resources for mirrors and consumers.
If it were straightforward, I would already have done it.
Here's a rundown of the space usage in the
I've just noticed that there are lots of jars stored in SVN under
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/branches/release-0.1-branch
AIUI, SVN should not be used for storing library jars.
==
The way other projects manage this is to define the jar dependencies
in a build file, and get
On 22 January 2011 07:34, Francis De Brabandere franci...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We (empire-db) just set up our DOAP file but we still have an issue.
http://projects.apache.org/indexes/alpha.html#E
The projects overview points to:
On 3 March 2011 03:19, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hmmm,
I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
that point users to our Incubator releases that
On 9 March 2011 16:40, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
The Apache Gora community has approved the 0.1-incubating release.
This will be Apache Gora's first release since coming to the Incubator.
We have three +1's IPMC binding votes so we ready to release, any
input is
On 14 March 2011 06:05, Adelita Padilla apadi...@g2ix.net wrote:
Hi,
The Apache NPanday community has approved the 1.3-incubating release and we
are now looking for the approval of the IPMC to publish the release.
These are the major changes included in this release:
* Visual Studio
On 15 March 2011 03:27, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/03/2011, at 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
On 14 March 2011 06:05, Adelita Padilla apadi...@g2ix.net wrote:
Hi,
The Apache NPanday community has approved the 1.3-incubating release and we
are now looking for the approval
On 15 March 2011 11:22, Adelita Padilla apadi...@maestrodev.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:05 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 March 2011 03:27, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/03/2011, at 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
On 14 March 2011 06:05, Adelita Padilla apadi
On 16 March 2011 09:40, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding:
I cannot read the tar.gz files with my normal tools (hexdump shows
that they are in RAR format), and the hashes have got spurious lines
in them which break automated checkers.
Looks like you guys are a) building the
On 17 March 2011 22:59, Andrei Savu savu.and...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Whirr, version
0.4.0-incubating.
It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1230version=12316065
*** Please download,
On 18 March 2011 16:43, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-03-18, sebb wrote:
But the main issue is that the binary distribution contains lots of
3rd party products which are not mentioned in either the NOTICE file
or the LICENSE file.
They likely are supposed
On 18 March 2011 22:02, Tom White tom.e.wh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 March 2011 16:43, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-03-18, sebb wrote:
But the main issue is that the binary distribution contains lots of
3rd
On 19 March 2011 03:09, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
The Apache Gora community has approved the 0.1-incubating-rc3 release.
This will be Apache Gora's first release since coming to the Incubator.
Thread about VOTE result:
On 19 March 2011 18:48, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Thanks Sebb.
Do you see the below as fix in 0.2-incubating or fix now?
To me they are fix in 0.2-incubating, but I'd appreciate your thoughts.
Well, if I were the RM, I'd probably create a new RC.
But I'm
On 3 April 2011 23:40, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Subversion tag for release:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.2-RC2/
NOTICE.txt is non-standard; see
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.2.1-RC2/NOTICE
for a conforming example.
On 7 April 2011 13:49, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Please review this again if you have time -
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.2/
- added DISCLAIMER.txt file
+1
The Hama website also needs to include the disclaimer (and apache
should be spelt
On 7 April 2011 17:24, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I just uploaded a release candidate for Deltacloud 0.3.0. The rc is
available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.3.0/rc1/
Please vote on the release candidate by Monday, 2011-04-10 8:00 PDT
Where is the
On 7 April 2011 18:14, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
This is the third release of Apache Bean Validation.
We have already received 4 binding IPMC votes during the PPMC voting
below, so I'm requesting a 72 hour lazy consensus before releasing the
artifacts.
Thanks,
Donald
1 - 100 of 1535 matches
Mail list logo
