On 8/9/24 09:44, Jim Dory wrote:
On 8/8/24 21:41, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 8/7/24 15:45, Jim Dory wrote:
Hello - started getting someone reporting to yahoo the subscription confirmation email as spam which can cause yahoo
to block our list if enough reports come to it. So I've revisited
On 8/8/24 21:41, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 8/7/24 15:45, Jim Dory wrote:
Hello - started getting someone reporting to yahoo the subscription confirmation email as spam which can cause yahoo
to block our list if enough reports come to it. So I've revisited this captcha thing again. I've
On 8/7/24 14:45, Jim Dory wrote:
On 12/13/23 12:08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 12/13/23 10:00, Jim Dory wrote:
As for listinfo.html, I see 2 pertinent files. on under ../en/templates (this list is just english) and under
../lists/[name of our list]/ . The templates version includes a few lines of
On 12/13/23 12:08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 12/13/23 10:00, Jim Dory wrote:
As for listinfo.html, I see 2 pertinent files. on under ../en/templates (this list is just english) and under
../lists/[name of our list]/ . The templates version includes a few lines of captcha which the lists version
On 6/25/24 15:32, Dmitri Maziuk wrote:
On 6/25/24 12:51, Jim Dory wrote:
2. SMTP: Reverse DNS doesn't match SMTP Banner (The SMTP banner issued by your email server did not contain the
hostname we resolved for your server’s IP address.)
#2 - Reverse DNS - I have PTR records set for
On 6/25/24 09:13, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
Just to be sure, I would try your host's name in one of the DNS/email test pages, such as
https://mxtoolbox.com/emailhealth/ (there are others).
Thanks Carl, a very good resource.
I put in compute.nomekennelclub.com and it shows nomekennelclub.com in t
On 6/24/24 17:16, Jim Dory wrote:
I have not done anything yet. Under Privacy Options/Sender Filters, I have for
dmarc_moderation_action : Munge,
dmarc_quarantine_moderation_action as Yes, dmarc_none_moderation_action is No, and the rest is blank. I don't really
understand any of tha
I have not done anything yet. Under Privacy Options/Sender Filters, I have for
dmarc_moderation_action : Munge,
dmarc_quarantine_moderation_action as Yes, dmarc_none_moderation_action is No, and the rest is blank. I don't really
understand any of that but I think I set them so on advice.
On 6/24/24 15:40, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Hi Jim,
Not an expert here, but a thought comes to mind.
When you moved to a new domain name, did you update your DMARC, DKIM,
and SPF records? (Whichever you use, if any.) Maybe the recipients think
the new server is not authorized to send on
Thank you Mark and Dmitri,
On 6/24/24 13:08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 6/24/24 12:13, Jim Dory wrote:
I just had my hosting company move our mailing list to an updated server. Now I'm suddenly getting a lot of bounces
of the sort:
550 5.4.1 Recipient address rejected: Access denied
Thi
gering the "550 5.4.1 recipient address
rejected" (a local company's employees mostly)
thanks for the help. /jim
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@pyth
On Sat, 2024-04-20 at 20:08 -0500, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> Are there any log entries, or debugging, that could be enabled /
> turned up to help diagnose this?
The vette log should have info about the dmarc lookups or lack of dmarc
for a domain
as an '@'.
at_sign = email.rfind('@')
if at_sign < 1:
return False
Are you able to reliably dig the sender's DMARC record over and over in a loop
to test the reliability of the sender's DNS, perha
On 12/13/23 17:07, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 12/13/23 17:48, Jim Dory wrote:
My bad.. rather than Bad Request error (oiy, my memory), the actual error when
enabling the RECAPTCHA strings is this:
Bug in Mailman version
We're sorry, we hit a bug!
Please inform the webmaste
On 12/13/23 12:08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 12/13/23 10:00, Jim Dory wrote:
As for listinfo.html, I see 2 pertinent files. on under ../en/templates (this list is just english) and under
../lists/[name of our list]/ . The templates version includes a few lines of captcha which the lists version
On 12/13/23 01:04, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Jim Dory writes:
> I've started getting these spamming attacks again so thought I
> would dive into trying this recaptcha. I got the keys for V2
> recaptcha from google and put the 2 lines at the bottom of the
> mm_cfg.py
On 10/24/23 06:04, David L. Dewey wrote:
Quoting Jim Dory (ja...@dorydesign.com):
On 10/23/23 17:38, rich...@karmannghia.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023, dde...@cyberthugs.com wrote:
..
Implementing the google captcha solution to Mailman a week or so ago stopped it
dead. For now...
Hi
On 10/23/23 17:38, rich...@karmannghia.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023, dde...@cyberthugs.com wrote:
..
Implementing the google captcha solution to Mailman a week or so ago stopped it
dead. For now...
Hi Jim,
Interesting, and thanks for posting.
Can you please describe, briefly, as
be harvesting emails
from subscribers, which are available in the reply-to headers.
Don't know if there's anything I can do. Anyone else dealing with this?
thanks. Jim
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsub
also this project:
https://github.com/jaredmauch/mailman2-python3/
-Jim P.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.pyt
On 3/9/23 16:54, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 3/9/23 11:24, annette carter wrote:
Please help. Where do I go to stop Yahoo and all of it's associated ISPs from
blacklisting my subscribers, please?
See these FAQ articles:
https://wiki.list.org/x/17891458
https://wiki.list.org/x/17891477
https://wiki
at Mark, will try that VERP trick. She is out of the office for the rest of
the week so will have to wait and see.
There's over 1500 subscribers so probably best to search on her corporation's domain - that may return maybe around a
couple dozen or so - rather than digest
On 8/16/21 11:10 AM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 8/16/2021 10:30 AM, Jim Dory wrote:
I've asked her to run it by the IT department of her corporation, but thought I would ask here in case there is
something I need to do instead. I thought that the "on behalf of listname-requ...@domai
make sure this person contacts her IT dept. to try and figure this out. Thanks for the reply! /jim
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.or
alf of listname-requ...@domain.com" was pretty unusual, or
something I don't usually see anyway.
thanks, Jim
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
osting MTAs?
> >
> > Almost certainly.
>
> Any suggestions/recommendations?
Vultr, RamNode, and HostUS are solid ones.
-Jim P.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman
On 3/18/21 12:33 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 3/18/21 12:35 PM, Jim Dory wrote:
Anyway - after 3 weeks of no bounces, I just got a bunch of GCI email
users automatically unsubscribed from the list, with this message:
"... has been removed from Nome-announce. (disabled address)"
My bo
d from Nome-announce. (disabled address)"
My bounce score threshold is set at 50.0, and the bounce_info_stale_after is 4. Number of days bounce-you-are-disabled
is 7. So I know it has been more than a week since any bounces. I'm wondering about this - if I have a setti
Ok, I started a ticket with the hosting service and they found a misconfigure in the mail routing. I'm not exactly clear
on the issue but since the server name has changed a few times and we migrated it once or twice - plus my inexperience -
something got borked. Here is what the tech guy said:
On 3/2/21 7:46 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 3/2/21 5:10 PM, Jim Dory wrote:
I just tried to send a
message and got this:
"A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
pipe to |/usr/local/c
I manage a list through CPanel v. 94.0.2 and I also have server access (from our paid host). Mailman v.2.1.33-2.cp1186.
I just tried to send a message and got this:
"A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The
following addres
On Sun, 2020-09-20 at 23:40 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes:
>
> On Sun, 2020-09-20 at 18:23 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > > I imagine ARC support is something Jim Popovitch would like to have.
>
> > You imagine w
nd decryption for DKIM, and that would be
> fairly easy to port (I'm pretty sure the underlying libraries are 2/3
> compatible). (Ports are fair game because we're talking "future", and
> I imagine ARC support is something Jim Popovitch would like to have.)
You imagine
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 14:56 -0400, Brian Carpenter wrote:
> On 9/17/20 2:27 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 14:15 -0400, Brian Carpenter wrote:
> > Absolutely not. I'm intrigued by the idea of mailman-core (1/3 of mm3)
> > with a li
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 14:15 -0400, Brian Carpenter wrote:
> On 9/17/20 1:45 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > That's kind of my point. mm2 works for me and my use, I'd much rather
> > prefer to keep it working than to rip it out and replace it, including
>
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 09:07 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 9/17/20 8:04 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 07:54 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> > > Forward to where?
> >
> > Oh the irony of you asking that question. :) If we go bac
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 07:54 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 9/17/20 7:36 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > Here's my POV, if mm2 can (and it appears to me that it
> > can somewhat easily) be fixed to use py3 then all the installed bases of
> > mm2 don't
some cases) and
some even save some $$, by not having to significantly change their
Mailman installation or server size, etc. What I'm trying to do is
provide a painless (or, at least a less painful) path forward for all
those existing Mailman sites that don't want to deal with all the sa
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 18:47 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes:
> > On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 02:34 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> > > You don't need to have a title, an @mailman email address, or a commit
>
you've shepherded. Like a parent who is offended by a teacher
or professor criticizing their child.
> "Manage just the new features" sounds like a terrible deal for the
> vast majority of admins and subscribers, and a ver
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 21:11 -0400, Brian Carpenter wrote:
> On 9/15/20 8:18 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > A small group, including myself, are planning to present a proposal. We
> > are in the early stage of defining what that will involve, but we are
> >
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 16:51 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 9/15/20 12:41 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > I demanded nothing. I was told by Mark that I would need to apply for
> > all those perks (sans the Cabal seat) when all I offered to do was
> > suppor
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 03:51 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes:
>
> > I personally think that you, Stephen, are digging high and low to find
> > any reason for Mailman2 to not continue forward under the Mailman
> > umbrella.
>
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 08:45 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 9/15/20 4:40 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > I'd use the new MM3 archive of this list to link to your posts, but
> > interacting with it is an abysmal time waste. At a minimum someone
> > should
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 16:10 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes:
>
> > See Stephens previous comments about how there was no way he could
> > or would work with anyone working on mm2 because it was against his
> > objectives,
>
On Sun, 2020-09-13 at 09:16 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 9/13/20 9:01 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > What I want to hear from the Cabal is that there is support and
> > appreciation for efforts by others to carry on with mm2 in any direction
> > it take
On Sun, 2020-09-13 at 15:36 +, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> OK, I'm back and more or less caught up so I'm ready to continue this
> discussion.
>
> In his initial post in this thread, Jim suggests that he and others want to
> join the Mailman Coders team on Launchpad
On 2020-09-09 7:35 a.m., Steven Jones wrote:
I get the default page OK but when I follow the link,
"List administrators, you can visit the list admin overview page to find the
management interface for your list."
I get,
Not Found
Are there virtual domains involved on that server? Is the *h
t; OK guys, what's really going on here?
>
> I don't know. I can tell you I'm done with Jim. You'll have to ask
> him about what he thinks is going on.
I'm more than happy to detail it. Stephen and Mark want to move on, and
get away from mm2, they want eve
sting gnu-mailman team
> doesn't want new members working on old code, and that's the way it sounds,
> just say so and give the blessing for a code fork.
I'd love to hear RMS's opinion of that.
-Jim P.
--
Mailman-U
On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 03:53 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes:
>
> > Again with the "Jim's team". Those other guys, that other group, them
> > folks That's nauseating to hear from you Stephen.
>
> I use
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 10:05 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 8/27/20 3:29 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > There is sooo much to respond to, but in order to stay on focus...
> > Brian, you fail to identify the problem, in fact you mischaracterized
> > it
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 09:30 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 8/27/20 3:41 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 17:41 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > > The question for you is what benefit there is to anyone in having
> > > Mailm
ne in
the sand.
-Jim P.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
ct certainly doesn't want to encourage new
> installations of Mailman 2.
Again, Do you mean the Mailman3 Project at mailman3.org and on the MM3-
org mailinglists? If so, fine, move on.
-Jim P.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman
;s up to the users to decide, while monitoring just how active
> Jim's team turns out to be.
Again with the "Jim's team". Those other guys, that other group, them
folks That's nauseating to hear from you Stephen.
> I think Jim should very much take this to hea
MM2 and you want the developers to keep
> supporting it.
Absolutely not. We see life in MM2 and want the gatekeepers out of the
way.
> That pressure can/does hinder the work on Mailman 3.
That is imaginary or self-contrived pressure.
-Jim P.
-
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 20:25 -0400, Brian Carpenter wrote:
> On 8/26/20 7:02 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > I'm not sure where you think money comes into this, unless you are
> > admitting that moving to mm3 requires expensive consulting contracts.
> > I
be part of the Mailman Team. There is
absolutely no reason against, and there are certainly several examples
for, having 2 or more active development branches in an open source (or
closed source for that matter) project.
-Jim P.
--
Mailm
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 23:52 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes:
>
> > A couple of days ago, over on the MAILOP mailinglist, there was a
> > long thread titled 'Mailman confirmation email denial of service'.
>
> *sigh
Hi Folks,
A couple of days ago, over on the MAILOP mailinglist, there was a long
thread titled 'Mailman confirmation email denial of service'. This
detailed some of the problems we've all seen with Mailman subscription
spam. The Mailman team has addressed a lot of these problems with
ReCAPTCHA
migrate this from the current Centos VM to an
> > > Ubuntu
> > > > EC2 instance
> > >
> > > You have choices. Basically, there are Debian/Ubuntu packages for both
> > > Mailman 2.1 and Mailman 3, but I don't necessarily recommend them. I
> >
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 17:18 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 3/2/20 1:55 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > There are plenty of people who are still happy with pipermail and some
> > of the other search options (Google, htdig, etc) What benefit does a
> > REST
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 10:54 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 3/2/20 8:56 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> > Barry's roadmap
> > for Python2 -> Python3 seems to counter the narrative that MM2 is ill-
> > advised to be ported to Python3 (btw, that wa
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 17:17 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes:
>
> > Interestingly enough, here's a roadmap on exactly how to do it: :)
>
> Jim, you're not helping.
Stephen, thank you for taking the time to respond. Alt
On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 10:46 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 2/29/20 7:02 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > If
> > a CSF/CSS is identified in Mailman v2.1.30 in May-2020, what will be
> > done to address it?
>
> I'd say it depend on the details of
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 14:51 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2020, at 14:24, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'd like to see the GNU Mailman project have a formal
> > Mailman 2.3 release that supports Python3, I feel that there would be
>
reason to believe that people will continue installing Mailman 2 for
> quite some time (even if it might be more convenient for *us* if
> everybody would switch to Mailman 3 ;-).
>
> Steve
Steve, given your comments above, please expand upon this scenario: If
a CSF/CSS is identified in M
On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 10:07 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 2/28/20 6:17 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 19:52 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > > Brian Carpenter writes:
> > >
> > > > I have hired a profession
sion should move to mailman-developers, though,
> and please introduce your UI developer(s) to us on mailman-developers
> soonish. Nobody has huge amounts of time to put into work on Mailman
> right now
That frightens me a bit.
> AFAIK, but I expect we will be willing to cooperate on a
ill a bit shocked to see you rush to abandon
something so popular and established.
Personally, I'd like to see the GNU Mailman project have a formal
Mailman 2.3 release that supports Python3, I feel that there would be a
lot of support for that.
-Jim P.
--
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 10:23 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 2/27/20 10:05 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > I've been wondering if we should change that to something like this:
> >
> > From: Jane Doe (jane@domain.tld) via Listname
> >
>
>
e should change that to something like this:
From: Jane Doe (jane@domain.tld) via Listname
This would be better for mobile email clients which can't/don't easily
display reply-to or other headers.
-Jim P.
--
Mailman-Users ma
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 00:19 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2020, at 10:52, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> > (I think I asked this a few months back, but I couldn't locate any
> > emails on it)
> >
> > What is the Apache rule syntax for
(I think I asked this a few months back, but I couldn't locate any
emails on it)
What is the Apache rule syntax for rejecting subscription linking that
doesn't come from the same domain/site?
tia,
-Jim P.
--
Mailman-Users mailing li
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 7:21 PM Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
>
> I'd need to see that
> message's full header to debug that fully, but it sounds like GCI is
> generally not doing a great job here.
>
>
>
Ok - just for curiosity sake, here is full header. I've 'e
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 12:56 AM Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> Jim Dory writes:
>
>
> > Sometimes I do get this: host mx1.arandomserver.com [198.252.100.64]
> > SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
> >
ion. [34.212.96.103 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0
SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML
included in message
The link in the messages is https://www.codepublishing.com/AK/Nome/ .
I can post more of the header if need be.
Could it be t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 11:06 -0500, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users
wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 16:59 +0100, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> > Am Mo., 25. Nov. 2019 um 16:47 Uhr schrieb Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users
> > :
> > >
On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 16:59 +0100, Johannes Rohr wrote:
>
> Am Mo., 25. Nov. 2019 um 16:47 Uhr schrieb Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users
> :
> > On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 10:17 -0500, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> > > Is there a timeline for that? Mailman 2.x requires python 2.
ain Python2.
HOWEVER, Redhat, Debian, etc., *will* still be maintaining Python2
throughout the lifecycles of their releases that contain Python2. So,
for Debian 10 (Buster) that is well past 2022 (which is the LTS end-data
for Debian 9).
Stop being scared by the Python team's misleading me
On 9/17/2019 1:37 PM, Kevin Bowen wrote:
Hello,
One of my instance's lists is apparently getting spammed with subscription
requests from addresses outside my org. In sender filters, for
reject_these_nonmembers I put ^(?!.*(example)\.com$) [actual domain
redacted], but the requests still get throu
Indeed email is not a synchronous messaging channel. But most email
clients will sort incoming messages by header Date thus undo the effects
of out-of-order delivery.
Even if you send out two messages in a row to j...@gmail.com there is
no guarantee that both messages go to the same machine.
ny mailer.
My updates to mm-handler are on: http://sw.ziobro.info/mm-handler/
Ciao,
//Z\\
Jim Ziobro
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.
orted in
Debian/Ubuntu releases for at least the next 5 years.
- -Jim P.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE3RmV4WutJ2KyCS2zPcxbabkKGJ8FAl0klKgACgkQPcxbabkK
GJ8mTxAAnR5TkcCIKNFP1zc5LGimgZYx9vOo25X7cheu72pwCSfCdEioSNrxb+Zs
sWF8bRbjFLioOEZ7GipmSP4Ez7gl1jqyjJ39KcqIJNyTKcnPaU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 14:17 -0700, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> On 7/8/2019 1:51 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> > I just keep getting reminded that we specifically support USA English
> > and we offer no other English l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 13:32 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 7/8/19 1:00 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
> >
> > Just to be clear, I'm not proposing changes to any po strings, rather
> > just the labels. Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 12:46 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 7/8/19 12:15 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> >
> > Now I'm confused. :-) I know about the differences in UK and US English
> > are in general
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 21:06 +0200, Christian F Buser wrote:
> Hi Jim
>
> I do not know about where the English (US) and English (UK) languages differ
> in Mailman. But in school, half a century ago, I learnt (learned) about the
>
a patch to convert it to
just "English" be welcomed?
- -Jim P.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE3RmV4WutJ2KyCS2zPcxbabkKGJ8FAl0jfwAACgkQPcxbabkK
GJ/flhAAgwOWRK83sSLjOrU1T5myc9RDCVrbCeFTZaR++AuvYlQUun1QKysaue4L
uEUiOU5gqSkLmamXfDvXExQfX1yuwWvz0Ea1OB94GofRtar5UsUuAV
which was merged into v2.1.29, specifically to address for such
idiotic policies.
https://code.launchpad.net/~jimpop/mailman/dmarc-moderation-addresses/+merge/359963
-Jim P.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mai
but that claims it's already installed, yet the error occurs. what i
> found you want to install is the package "python-dev".
>
python-dev should only be necessary if you are building Mailman from
source. If you are installing from PPA/apt/rpm/dpkg/etc you should only
need pyt
properties-common"
which may need to be installed on your system.
hth.
- -Jim P.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEECPbAhaBWEfiXj/kxdRlcPb헹ᐔॳ耀⠤䇔数
fkWqsw//RNCXQJ0BX/3SaNuNtdcၔ掽뀘媹였耬탦�ꂏ僁⍈�
owdiovTqyAe7lnmHYSCIIr01h7BGh1Y2N4cQztzYZORꄮ萊㲘Ⱶ╹
dcpJv2nYTRiPYdsRgxEMYrsoBR1MjykNOOMI6Ts5Pl8rhJI
;list' because 'list'
> is the owner of Mailman's data/aliases.db file. You can change this by
> `chown daemon data/aliases.db` but you need to ensure that that file is
> still group 'list' and group writable for
r not) will be
> receiving (and can locally archive) the posts.
>
> > It's a hack of Jim Popovitch's code which restricts archive access to
> > unmoderated subscribers.
>
> Ditto.
>
> The only scenario where either of these restrictions makes sense to m
.
There's a lot of gas left in mm2. I know Mark sure is tired of it, but
there's no way right now to have mm3 running on a public IP and ignore it for
weeks/months like everyone does with mm2.
-Jim P.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list M
honestly every time I looked it seemed like all the focus was everything but
the email reflector bits.
-Jim P.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.l
FetchMail injects messages into the local mail system via SMTP. I see
it also supports LMTP. So I guess you would not need a local mail
system with Mailman3. But why not setup standard Mailman under your
favorite mail system and let FetchMail do what it does best? It is a
widely supported
enjoyed
having the digest so it didn't ping his phone for every message rolling in.
(Some of us know how to filter that, but most users may not). So I probably
will not disable it.
/jim
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:39 AM Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
>
> (You probably should
> also disable the Digestable option in [Digest options]
>
I'm also receiving several bounces back for errors such as:
"SMTP error from remote mail server after end of dat
1 - 100 of 1009 matches
Mail list logo