Re: [talk-ph] Strava Heatmap

Eugene Alvin Villar wrote on Tuesday, 21 November, 2017 01:52 PM: > I find it more useful for aligning imagery. :) Interesting. I know how to align the background imagery in OSM to the GPS traces within OSM. But how would you do it using an external source like this? Just in case I need it

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Hi Erwin, This is entirely posible in Osmose. See for example: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#item=8120=13=44.8202=-0.5935=Mapnik=T=1%2C2%2C3== 2017-11-21 4:08 GMT+01:00 Erwin Olario : > So sorry for the terse reply. > > Right now, the only way to

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Martijn, Maproulette does give hashtags to ID changesets using the changeset comment right now. There are tools like osmcha or Pascal Neis's osm-changesets to easily filter them. A dedicated tag might of course help find "anything that started with a QA tool", which is then filter-able by tool

[OSM-talk-ie] Luas Cross City

Hi, This is due to open on 9 December 2017. The entire railway is in place and the remaining works are things like ticket validators, signage, depot / substation works, tidying up, etc. When should the railway be changed from railway=construction to railway=tram? Stops are currently named

Re: [OSM-ja] 歩道のマッピング

ごうだまりぽ (id:maripogoda)と申します。 秋葉原〜湯島付近でぼちぼち歩道を描きはじめているのですが、いろいろと悩みどころも 多いです。 「縁石と歩道の主線をつなぐ部分」や点字ブロックについての疑問です。 > しかしながら、歩道は安全ゾーンで、縁石から先が危険ゾーンというのが > 特に障害をお持ちの方にはある感覚なので、 > 横断歩道はこちらの縁石から向こうの縁石まで > と案内できるようにデータを作っておくのがベターではないでしょうか。 > 横断歩道(縁石)の手前に点字ブロックがある場合はこの問題になっている部分に >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Wiki OSM : fusion des catégories FR:Randonnée et FR:Marche à pied

Bonjour, Je comprends les arguments de Christian R. et Philippe donc je ne touche pas aux catégories FR:Randonnée et FR:Marche à pied : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:FR:Randonn%C3%A9e https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Hiking en anglais

[talk-ph] Fwd: [Osmf-talk] Directed Editing Policy

Heads up. The Data Working Group is aiming to develop a policy to govern directed editing in OSM. Comments and suggestions are welcome. -- Forwarded message -- From: "Frederik Ramm" Date: Nov 21, 2017 8:56 AM Subject: [Osmf-talk] Directed Editing Policy To:

[talk-ph] Strava Heatmap

Just of general mapping interest. https://labs.strava.com/heatmap/#13.42/121.01607/14.56427/hot/ride Can use it to see where people cycle, run, etc. Jim -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Martijn, I'll agree with Yuri that is has to be the choice of the mapper to work in a specific region and not the challenge creator. I don't want to ask each challenge creator to split up the challenge in smaller chunks, just because I feel uncomfortable editing outside a certain area. This area

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

So sorry for the terse reply. Right now, the only way to build task is to specify the location or specific objects. The use-case I have in mind is when a data provider allows or donates their data into OSM, and apart from geographic location and geometry, they have specific attributes usable in

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping buildings in Canada by 2020

Bonjour Charles, Je suis en contact avec le responsable de McGill. Effectivement, dans leurs cas ils prévoient réviser le travail avec les étudiants. Par contre dans le cadre de Mapathons, il est important de prévoir en général de bien sopporter les nouveaux contributeurs. Il me semble important

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping buildings in Canada by 2020

Bonjour Pierre, Juste quelques précisions car j'ai été impliqué dans une de ces activités. Dans le cas de Williams Lake (projet 91), il a été utilisé pour un mapathon d'un nouveau groupe (Open Mapping Group McGill). C'est un nouveau groupe, mais qui me semble très bien organisé. Il ya eu trois

Re: [OSM-ja] 歩道のマッピング

あ、 > ただし、ご指摘を受けてよく考えると > crossing=zebraを使った場合には歩行者用信号機の有無を明示的に表現できなくなる > という問題があるので、今後はcrossing_ref=zebraを推奨した方が > 良さそうに感じています。 これ、道路と横断歩道の交点ノードに歩行者用信号機を置けばすむので crossing_ref=zebra推奨というより、とりあえず様子見で どちらも可の方が良さそうですね。混乱させてすみません。 東 > 東 > > 2017/11/19 tomoya muramoto : >>

Re: [OSM-ja] 歩道のマッピング

瀧口さん、みなさん ご指摘ありがとうございます。この件、お返事が遅くなりました。 利用件数でいえば crossing_ref=zebraは280,549件 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/crossing_ref#values crossing=zebraは325,160件 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/crossing#values と、後者のほうが多いのですが 確かによくよくwiki記事を探してみると 前者の記述はあっても後者の記述は見当たらないので

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping buildings in Canada by 2020

John Je t'ai informé précédemment que je constatais pour Calgary des doublons d'adresse, celle-ci était ajoutée à la fois sur l'immeuble principal et le garage. Et vérifiant rapidement, j'ai vu des cas similaires à Ottawa. Je n'ai cependant pas analysé plus en détail la qualité des éditions

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

Gleb, On 11/21/2017 12:02 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Of course multipolygonizing couple of buildings that touch coastline in > Monterey was wrong. Sorry, I was in a multipolygonizing rage as I was > going through the coastline. :) We have a general (unwritten) convention in OSM and that is

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

Briefly (thanks for the reminder, again, Ian!): If the reltoolbox plug-in as as powerful as I am beginning to understand it may be (I appreciate the introduction, Gleb), and given my agreement that certain use cases (especially landuse) benefit greatly from multipolygonized boundaries (they

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Belgium Phone Format OSM Tool

On 2017-11-21 00:08, marc marc wrote: > Hello, > > Le 20. 11. 17 à 23:49, Ubipo . a écrit : > >> I don't know of any library that does all that :( > https://github.com/googlei18n/libphonenumber/ > I never use it but it look like fine. > > Regards, > Marc That's what the JOSM suggestion

Re: [Talk-us] Talk-us Digest, Vol 120, Issue 17

This thread is tedious, but I will soldier on. Gleb Smirnoff writes: > Looks like the acception of multipolygons here is not as bad as I initially > read in this email thread. So, we agree that at some level they are easier > to maintain that shared nodes. Do we? I cannot

Re: [OSM-ja] 歩道のマッピング

muramotoさん おお、勘違いしていました。 私も横断歩道は highway=footway footway=crossing で描いています。失礼しました。 wikiは後ほど修正しておきます。 東 2017/11/20 Taro Matsuzawa : > 松澤です。 > > 東さんの > > ただ、私はhighway=crossingで横断歩道のウェイを既にかなり > > 描いているので、その描き方も可としてほしいです。 > > （その前提でソフトウェアも動いていたりする） >

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:15 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: > Please, ENTER data using shared ways where it makes sense to do so. Nobody > is saying "don't do that." ALSO, please be aware that existing > NON-multipolygon data (especially imports and other "curated"

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

Hi everybody! Please remember to stay on topic and friendly. This thread seems to be drifting off into a discussion about the merits of OSM editors. Also remember that long replies tend to result in people talking past one another. Short, sweet, and to the point helps a conversation stay on

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

On 20/11/2017 19:36, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Come on, JOSM itself is difficult, but everyone who groked JOSM, never returns to Potlach. Untrue.  Each of the OSM editors has strengths and weaknesses - it's simply a case of finding the best tool for the job.  In some cases that might be JOSM; in

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] ref:INSEE <> ref:FR:INSEE <> sur quel objet

Bonsoir à tous Le 20 novembre 2017 à 18:11, Christian Rogel < christian.ro...@club-internet.fr> a écrit : > > Pour la précision, FVig n’a contribué que sur le Pays de Brest (87 > communes sur 283 avant loi Notre), soit le quart NO du département. > Pour la double précision, il s'agit du SIGiste

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

Kevin and others: please do not misunderstand me. There ARE times when shared ways between multipolygons is an elegant and THE correct solution, as you, I and many others have found to be true and edited into existence many times. By no means do I advocate that where such beauty has been

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

Kevin, On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 04:29:56PM -0500, Kevin Kenny wrote: K> (3) Ease of editing (for better-informed or better-tooled users). At K> least for me, working in JOSM, I find updating a mesh of multipolygons K> with shared ways to be fairly straightforward. Split the ways at any K> new

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 02:13:44PM -0800, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: O> Plug-ins that offer "power tools" beyond that? Well, caveat usor. Note that a large part of current JOSM base functionality before was in plugins. So, doesn't make sense to diminish some tool because it isn't in base.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Belgium Phone Format OSM Tool

Hello, Le 20. 11. 17 à 23:49, Ubipo . a écrit : > I don't know of any library that does all that :( https://github.com/googlei18n/libphonenumber/ I never use it but it look like fine. Regards, Marc ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Belgium Phone Format OSM Tool

Hey all, Haha thanks for noticing that rookie mistake Wouter, better now than when I implement it I guess... I added some automated tests to check for basic errors like that one to the repo on GitHub. Regarding that JOSM thread, It would be awesome if JOSM had a build-in

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Utilisation du tag 'name' avec les langues régionales

Il y a aussi les remarques faites à oc-escorpion : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51312940 Que a répondu dans une langue que je ne parle pas (je comprends qu'il voulait que le nom en occitan soit visible de tous) mais qui a cessé de contribuer sous ce pseudo. D'où l'impression de

[Talk-ca] Mapping buildings in Canada by 2020

>BC2020 *is not a StatCan project*. That comment came from Bjenk's old boss. I note that Pierre has identified some data quality issues from maperthons that appear to be associated with this. Is anyone organising this or is it just a dream in the air? In Ottawa we got some high quality mapping

[Talk-cz] Spolupráce/Koordinace - update regionu Dolní Morava, Kralický sněžník

Ahoj! Připravujeme outdoorový portál na platformě OUTDOORACTIVE v regionu Dolní Morava. Otdooractive používá OSM a patří mezi OSM Contributors. Chtěl bych naše práce koordinovat s někým, kdo má region na starost J nebo k němu má blízko. Byli jsme na Dolní Moravě týden v září a týmy procházely

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

Thank you, Kevin for your thoughtful and rather complete reply! Mark Wagner wrote: > Of course, this only works for ordinary relations. If the way you > clicked on is shared by two or more relations, you need to go > through the far more complicated method of playing with

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

For JOSM See this JOSM ticket that address transfer of HOT TM tags https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/10758and this HOT TM ticket https://github.com/hotosm/osm-tasking-manager2/issues/703   Pierre Le lundi 20 novembre 2017 16:49:39 HNE, Bryan Housel a écrit :

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Hey Martijn, it’s currently possible to send comments and hashtags to iD (they can be sent as two different parameters, or just embed the hashtags in the comments like the task managers currently do). It’s not possible to set other changeset tags, but it is something I could add if there is a

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Sorry, something went wrong with my previous email, I think. I’ll try and phrase again. It is a good idea, Pierre, to have various tools use a consistent set of tags on changesets. I think that is what you are suggesting? MapRoulette already does send some ‘hashtags’ to JOSM.  Who knows if

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Martin, Yes I suggest to add tags to the changeset metadata. On the HOT discussion list and the Github Tasking Manager project, you should find discussions about this. Yes, it is possible to send these tags with the remote control.   Pierre Le lundi 20 novembre 2017 16:45:02 HNE, Martijn

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Hi Pierre, That is a good idea and there are already some ‘hashtags’ that MapRoulette sends to JOSM. I don’t know if this is possible in iD as well. I think it is something that could be improved upon. Perhaps with changeset tags (is that what you are suggesting?) Does anyone know if JOSM and

Re: [Talk-it] Mappatura piramidi

Ciao, con earth_pyramid non c'è nessun tag (cercato sia su taginfo che overpass turbo), quindi eviterei di introdurlo. Per l'uso di natural=stone che ne dite? Effettivamente questa formazione è abbastanza particolare, quindi potrei anche fregarmene e mappare senza farmi troppe seghe mentali ;-)

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

I'm somewhat relieved to hear Gleb and Frederik injecting a voice indicating that 'shared ways' separating regions might be an acceptable approach, because I've adopted it myself. Well, to some extent, any way. I'm generally against sharing ways EXCEPT when topology demands it -as it often does.

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:43:34AM -0800, Mark Wagner wrote: M> > (I couldn't for the life of me figure out how to add a way to a M> > relation!) M> M> Select a way currently part of the relation. Shift-click on the way M> you want to add. Select "Update multipolygon" from the "Tools" menu, M>

Re: [Talk-it] Editor ID e layer di sfondo

sent from a phone > On 19. Nov 2017, at 23:03, Davide Sandona' wrote: > > Ho un paio di domande riguardo l'editor online ID: > 1. esiste la possibilità di caricare la cartografia PCN? Secondo la pagina > wiki no, ma è vecchia di un paio d'anni... [1] no, perché è

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Martijn, I think this is very similar to what Osmose does in its DB view (and I think several other tools do in the map view) - they offer a choice of a "world view" (unfiltered) or a "region views" - where users may choose what region they are interested in (e.g. a dropdown). I think it would be

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Hi Martijn We see an increase of coordinatead actions via QA and TM tools. But this is not systematically documented on the Changeset metadata. For QA tools, sometimes we see in the comments reference to MapRoulette or other tools. It is possible for these tools to transfer infos to editors

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Marc,  Good point and something that has come up often. As Joost mentioned in a reply, the easy solution for this is, as a challenge owner, to split up the challenge into regional chunks and label them as such.  The new version will have ‘filter by current map bounds’. I’m not quite sure how

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

On Nov 20, 2017, at 11:32 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Hi Steve, > that was a long rant, I enjoyed reading it. Thank you, but I'd call it "moderate length" for me, I can and do (infamously) rant MUCH longer, as many will attest. > Your retelling of my > words is way better

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Marc, as task managers for this Belgian task, Ben and I could just as well split the Challenge up into smaller bits, e.g. by town/village. For more labour-intensive Challenges, we will probably do that. I do agree that it would be nice to do such a thing. I wrote this Github issue with a single

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

A longer version (I'll try). I assume we all agree that overlapping or not reaching polygons where there is adjacency on the ground is wrong. So how can we properly express adjacency? The simple way is to run two polygons through the same subset of nodes. The advanced is to separate this

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

On 11/20/2017 2:36 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: In the simple way you need to follow all nodes your predessor had drawn, clicking all the nodes, be it 25 nodes or 100. In the advanced way, you don't. You instantly reuse his line for your new polygon. This was a most typical example of benefits that

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

Hi Steve, that was a long rant, I enjoyed reading it. Your retelling of my words is way better than my original text, which you could quote. I regret that I yet can't produce such a good text in English. That's why often for me it is easier to yield rather than argue and stand my position.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Belgium Phone Format OSM Tool

On 2017-11-18 13:49, Ubipo . wrote: Hey all, I wanted to let you know about a tool I made called 'BPF' - Belgium Phone Formatter. When provided with OSM login credentials and a list of OSM ID's to

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:15:01 -0800 Evin Fairchild wrote: > (I couldn't for the life of me figure out how to add a way to a > relation!) Select a way currently part of the relation. Shift-click on the way you want to add. Select "Update multipolygon" from the "Tools"

Re: [Talk-cz] Jak vznikají chyby v RUIAN

No hej. Myslel jsem, že tohle je jasný... Otázka zní, jak nám ta informace pomůže. 樂 H. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Vyhlášení soutěže Společně otevíráme data_Zvláštní cena

Já určitě ne, jsem v práci a nemám šanci se do Prahy dostat. Tak rychlé spojení opravdu nemáme.___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka!

2017-11-20 16:30 GMT+01:00 Petr Vejsada : > Ano, kvůli té změně. > Správná odpověď by byla "ne, kvůli té změně", ale ok, rozumím, netřeba to dál rozvádět. Díky H. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-cz] Jak vznikají chyby v RUIAN

Ahoj, tak mi konečně došlo jak vznikají ty rozřezané budovy a chyby typu budova místo dvora. Ono je to špatně už v té analogové KM. Definiční body jsou zakreslené na nádvoří a pak už se to jen zdigitalizuje. Např. http://ruian.poloha.net/20/50.07749/14.46369/bk Rozřezané domy - to samé v

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Vyhlášení soutěže Společně otevíráme data_Zvláštní cena

kdyz tam bude za komunitu víc lidí, tak je to myslím ok já v tuhle dobu zítra opravdu nemůžu jestli tam je prostor na rečnění nevim, ale štěstí přeje připraveným 2-3 lidi? Petr, Majka, ...? On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, 17:08 Petr Vejsada, wrote: > Ahoj, > > Dne Po 20.

[talk-au] NTLIS WMS

Hi All, I was reading the e-mail back and forth with Geoscience Australia (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/Geoscience_Australia) on the use its data alongside OpenStreetMap. The final message in the thread implies that the CC-BY waiver given for the 250:00 dataset applies to

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

On 20/11/2017 17:58, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: ... Glebius is right in my backyard and I've found his coastal "restructurings" (e.g. http://www.osm.org/changeset/46756097) to be bizarre and unnecessary, often overwriting correct official (county GIS imported) data simply to not "share some

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [osm-grenoble] Importation des arbres municipaux de Grenoble

Bonsoir, > contre le fait d'importer des tag ref dans tous les sens : > - 4 tags ref:xxx:yyy, source:date, source, etc Juste pour re préciser, j'ai jamais parler de plein de tag sur les objets. Source date etc ont leur place sur le changeset. Pour la ref, SI il y a un usage, cela me semble

[Talk-es] Accesibilidad: experiencia en Elche

Hola, en la reunión que tuvimos sobre accesibilidad comenté que conocía una experiencia que se realizó en Elche, y quedé que la enviaría a la lista para darla a conocer, y también por si alguien conoce a alguien de los organizadores, ya que en el momento de la reunión nadie los conocía. A

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

Yeah, using multipolygons for everything is quite overkill, and it certainly does overcomplicate things, and not just for new users, but for experienced users as well. I mean, if it requires some plugin that I've never heard of in JOSM to easily edit it, then it's too complicated. I typically

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [osm-grenoble] Importation des arbres municipaux de Grenoble

Le 19/11/2017 à 14:46, Jérôme Villafruela a écrit : Je pense qu'il faudrait ajouter le tag ref (champ BIEN_REFERENCE) : Mon avis doit commencer à être minoritaire par ici, mais j'en profite pour le rappeler : contre le fait d'importer des tag ref dans tous les sens : - ça effraie le nouveau

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

I very much agree with Douglas and Rihards that glebius' mapping is (around here) unusual, "terrible" and difficult to parse, even for experienced mappers who have been mapping for most of the history of OSM, like me. Glebius is right in my backyard and I've found his coastal "restructurings"

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] ref:INSEE <> ref:FR:INSEE <> sur quel objet

> > Le 20 novembre 2017 à 00:43, Philippe Verdy > a écrit : > > > Pour le Finistere, j'ai l'impression que c'est des imports de lieux dit en > 2011 par "FVig" avec comme tag un ref:FR:INSEE et un ref:FR:fantoir. avec > comme valeur, pour

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

The possibility to work more locally. E.g. there is a project to add missing roads in Belgium, I would really like to see only the "issues" within let say 20km of my house (an arbitrary point I can set). m. On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi all, > >

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Hi Erwin,  Can you give an example of what you would like to see and how you would like it to work? --  Martijn van Exel On November 20, 2017 at 6:30:01 AM, Erwin Olario (gov...@gmail.com) wrote: I wish to see support for OSM tags for tasks. On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:02 AM Martijn van Exel

Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka!

Tohle ale není ani tak posun, jako buď kdysi tak úplně nepřiznaná velká přestavba (dost časté na vsích), případně i oficiálně nová postavená budova, a ten pozemek pod je jen zbytek po tom starém baráku. Máme toho tady po okolí dost. Protože u nových budov vidím takto vydělené pozemky pod stavbou

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [osm-grenoble] Importation des arbres municipaux de Grenoble

Le 20 novembre 2017 à 08:12, Christian Quest a écrit : > genus + species ? > > Le wiki indique que genus=* est inutile si on renseigne species=* > > "The biological classification system is hierarchical. You should use the > most specific taxon that you know, but there

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Vyhlášení soutěže Společně otevíráme data_Zvláštní cena

Ahoj, Dne Po 20. listopadu 2017 16:31:08, majka napsal(a): > Jestli jsem našla dobře, tak je to už zítra Zítra v Dlouhé? No vlastně bych mohl a coby hlavní autor CzechAddress (tedy velký vyžírač opendat) by se to asi i hodilo. Mohu také zmínit, že proud dat není jen od státní správy k OSM ale

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] ref:INSEE <> ref:FR:INSEE <> sur quel objet

Le 20 novembre 2017 à 16:35, Jérôme Amagat a écrit : > > > Le 20 novembre 2017 à 00:43, Philippe Verdy a écrit : > >> >> >> Le 19 novembre 2017 à 14:32, marc marc a >> écrit : >> >>> @Vincent @Philippe et donc que

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Utilisation du tag 'name' avec les langues régionales

Et si... il manque le trait d'union. J'ai envoyé un message à la pref pour qu'ils publient un arrêté rectificatif... et lien vers la circulaire de la DGCL à ce sujet: http://www.maire-info.com/upload/files/Circulaire_nom_communes_nouvelles.pdf Le 20 novembre 2017 à 16:17, Jérôme Amagat

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Martijn van Exel wrote > For those who have used MapRoulette or at least have a good understanding of > what it does: what would be the *one top thing* for you that would make it > better? Built-in iD editor, to avoid switching contexts. Ilya ___

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] ref:INSEE <> ref:FR:INSEE <> sur quel objet

Le 20 novembre 2017 à 00:43, Philippe Verdy a écrit : > > > Le 19 novembre 2017 à 14:32, marc marc a > écrit : > >> @Vincent @Philippe et donc que proposez-vous concrètement ? >> Parce que changer une clef majoritaire qui 'a pas de collision pour

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Vyhlášení soutěže Společně otevíráme data_Zvláštní cena

Dne Po 20. listopadu 2017 14:18:25, Jachym Cepicky napsal(a): > Hradecká 18, 130 00 Praha 3 Tam? To mám 5 minut pěšky z domova. ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka!

Dne Po 20. listopadu 2017 15:02:53, Marián Kyral napsal(a): > Ono někdy totiž KM jaksi neodpovídá ortoforo. Budova ve skutečnosti leží na > pozemku trochu jinde, nebo je jinak natočená. Jednou mi přišlo, že je KM opravdu hodně posunutá vůči ortofotu. Pak jsem to prohlédl pozorněji a zjistil

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Vyhlášení soutěže Společně otevíráme data_Zvláštní cena

Jestli jsem našla dobře, tak je to už zítra 2017-11-20 15:22 GMT+01:00 Marián Kyral : > Kdy? Kam? > > Marián > > -- Původní e-mail -- > Od: Jachym Cepicky

Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka!

Dne Po 20. listopadu 2017 14:38:56, Jan Macura napsal(a): > > V budovách TODO přibylo asi 1300 kousků kvůli změně. > > > Kvůli změně v RÚIAN? Jakože vznikly (nově se postavily nebo zaměřily)? Nebo > to myslíš jinak? Ano, kvůli té změně. Počítá se to tak, že když je alespoň 70% plochy budovy v

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Utilisation du tag 'name' avec les langues régionales

Le 19 novembre 2017 à 16:04, Christian Quest a écrit : > Le 18/11/2017 à 19:20, Jérôme Amagat a écrit : > > > > Le 18 novembre 2017 à 18:45, Christian Quest a > écrit : > >> La règle de toponymie pour les noms officiels est simple... >> >> Pas

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

Hi, On 11/19/2017 11:48 PM, Douglas Hembry wrote: > glebius believes that this approach (with the help of the reltoolbox > JOSM plugin) is easier and less error-prone than having multiple simple > closed ways (eg, a building footprint and an adjacent pedestrian area) > sharing a set of nodes

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Stats serveurs de tuiles OSM-FR...

On peut voir que le réseau Mondial Relay consomme à lui tout seul pas mal de bande passante pour localiser ses points de livraison colis via les sites marchands. Idem pour rail.cc. Il faudrait peut-être voir à les informer qu'on ne peut pas assurer la qualité de bande passante et de temps de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Erreur de limite admin sur l'ile de la réunion ?

Ces quartiers sont ils seulement des noms de 'lieux dit", des noms utilisés dans les adresses ou par la population ou alors la mairie s'en sert pour des conseil de quartier ou autre chose du même genre qui aurait un certain pouvoir sur leur quartier, avis ou décision? Si c'est juste des noms de

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Vyhlášení soutěže Společně otevíráme data_Zvláštní cena

Kdy? Kam? Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Jachym Cepicky Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 20. 11. 2017 15:19:28 Předmět: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Vyhlášení soutěže Společně otevíráme data_ Zvláštní cena "Dámy a

[Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Vyhlášení soutěže Společně otevíráme data_Zvláštní cena

Dámy a pánové, může někdo z aktivních dorazit? dik j -- Forwarded message - From: Lenka Kováčová Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017, 15:03 Subject: DŮLEŽITÉ_Vyhlášení soutěže Společně otevíráme data_Zvláštní cena To: Jáchym Čepický

[OSM-talk] HOT Tech Challenge | Mapping Visualisation Tool

The Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team has released a new TECH CHALLENGE! :: https://www.hotosm.org/job/hot_mapping_visualisation_tool/2017 :: We are seeking an experienced developer and UX designer to create a 'Mapping Visualisation Tool', The tool aims to easily automate the creation of

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Erreur de limite admin sur l'ile de la réunion ?

Ma "source" locale m'indique que "La Bretagne" fait bien partie du quartier Sainte-Clotilde. Sauf avis contraire, je ferai la modif bientôt. Stf Le 17/11/2017 à 22:36, PanierAvide a écrit : Bonsoir, Il semblerait, de source locale, que ce soit bien le cas. La résidence ici [1] comporte

Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka!

-- Původní e-mail -- Od: Jan Macura Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 20. 11. 2017 14:40:17 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka! " Ahoj, 2017-11-20 12:00 GMT+01:00 Petr Vejsada

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Stats serveurs de tuiles OSM-FR...

goaccess génère un fichier html (ou csv ou json) depuis les logs du serveur http (nginx dans notre cas). Il n'est pas vraiment prévu pour requêter dans les logs, restreindre à une période, etc. L'avantage c'est qu'il ne dépend d'aucun autre outil, il stocke juste dans des fichiers intermédiaire

Re: [Talk-it] Editor ID e layer di sfondo

1. credo/temo di no 2. si, però la nuova heatmap funziona solo a livelli di zoom inferiori o uguali a 16, quindi si rischia che i sentieri mappati risultino un po' "spigolosi". Qua trovi l'url da inserire nel livello personalizzato su iD

Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka!

Ahoj, 2017-11-20 12:00 GMT+01:00 Petr Vejsada : > tak hotovy všechny vrstvy (adresy, budovy, ulice, parcely, landuse, > budovy-todo). díky za tu práci. > V budovách TODO přibylo asi 1300 kousků kvůli změně. Kvůli změně v RÚIAN? Jakože vznikly (nově se postavily nebo

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

I wish to see support for OSM tags for tasks. On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:02 AM Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi all, > > For those who have used MapRoulette or at least have a good understanding > of what it does: what would be the *one top thing* for you that would make > it better?

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Stats serveurs de tuiles OSM-FR...

Effectivement c'est sexy ! Je suis étonné de voir que sur 38 TB seulement 15 viendrait de la France... Le 20 novembre 2017 à 13:38, sly (sylvain letuffe) a écrit : > Il est très sexy ce goaccess, mais si on gratte, il manque quand même > quelques trucs bien utiles (c'est

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Stats serveurs de tuiles OSM-FR...

Il est très sexy ce goaccess, mais si on gratte, il manque quand même quelques trucs bien utiles (c'est p'tet un truc qui s'active) : Dans les referers il annonce "www.free.fr" en 14ème place mais fouiller tout leur site pour trouver à quelle page ils s'en servent, c'est pas aisé ! ( Referrers

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

On 11/19/2017 5:48 PM, Douglas Hembry wrote: I told glebius that I wanted to find out what the community thought. Is this just one more valid optional way of mapping? To be recommended for adoption if possible? Or to be avoided? Thoughts? I have this situation locally where much of the

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Marquage et jalonnement en randonnée

Nicolas Dumoulin-2 wrote > Quelques exemples ici : Et ben mon vieux ! Tu nous illustres le fait de tagguer "name" sur les panneaux de rando et on a un contre jour, un flou, et un arraché. Pas évident de juger de la pertinence du "name" sur tes exemples :-) Mais je suppose que ceux qui participent

Re: [talk-au] [Aust-NZ] FOSS4G-ANZ?

Agreed. Very interested in keeping momentum here. I have relationships with QUT, UQ and Griffith in Brisbane if that helps (although organising smaller OSM events through any of them has not been successful yet). Also, we have been discussing some of this on the MaptimeAU slack, in the #sotm

Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka!

Ahoj, tak hotovy všechny vrstvy (adresy, budovy, ulice, parcely, landuse, budovy-todo). V budovách TODO přibylo asi 1300 kousků kvůli změně. Posun v Jablunkově vůči KM je dle Qgisu 2.7 cm, viz obrázek. Je to zase ta plackárna u autobusového nádraží. Lepší to se stávajícím gridem nebude. Ty

Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka!

-- Původní e-mail -- Od: Ha Noj Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 20. 11. 2017 10:23:32 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka! "Dne 20. listopadu 2017 10:16 Marián Kyral napsal(a): > >

Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka!

Dne 20. listopadu 2017 10:16 Marián Kyral napsal(a): > > -- Původní e-mail -- > Od: Ha Noj > Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic > Datum: 20. 11. 2017 10:06:52 > Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Fungující transformace z Křováka!

[Talk-it] Rivenditore oli lubrificanti

Buongiorno, come si taggano i rivenditori in oggetto? Vendono anche batterie per auto. Grazie Andreas Lattmann -- Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

  1   2   >