All the generators have to be balanced- heating capacity = cooling capacity;
you cannot cool the second E-cat in a row with steam- very bad heat
transmission. It must be something like warm- hot- very- hot- steam, or with
the cooling "line" under pressure. Not an easy problem, however not an
imposs
In reply to Dennis's message of Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:49:01 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>Looking at the pictures, it seems to be fairly simple mechanically. The
>chamber is 50cc and not 1 liter as we were made to believe.
Two different devices. This 4 kW version has a 50 cc chamber. The original 10 kW
versio
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Thu, 7 Apr 2011 07:51:42 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
>> Yup. But I started writing that text before I learned that. Besides a 10 x
>> 10 array is easy to envision, whereas . . . 17 x 17?
I think that if you put two devices in series you already get superheated steam,
so
Have you seen what has answered Rossi re my question about E-lions or
E-tigers? Here IS a problem, but 300 E-kitten bound together IS a greater
problem, I think
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
>
>
>> According to Rossi's latest plans, the megawatt r
I wrote:
>Stellar fusion can account for the lighter elements up to and including iron,
>but how the heavier elements arose is not so clear. Indeed, most of the
>heavier
>elements might be produced by cold fusion processes.
Well maybe most of the heavy elements can be explained by stellar fus
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 6 Apr 2011 07:59:15 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>When you compare the amount of hydrogen "lost" compared to the energy
>released, it works out to something like 100 keV per proton (but that can vary
>depending on which Rossi quote you have) ... which is far less t
In reply to P.J van Noorden's message of Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:46:27 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>The energy release of the hydrino producing reaction is 50 MJ/mol hydrogen
>gas. The prefered reactionproduct seems to be H1/4.
>See http://www.blacklightpower.com/papers/Eng%20Power050410S.pdf
>
>So if 25 kWh i
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:30:21
-0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Regarding the hydrino theory, my first impression would be to conclude
>(with absolutely no math to back this conclusion up with) that not
>enough hydrogen was consumed (into hydrinos) that would exp
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:25:21 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>OTOH I suppose we can assume that lots of copper migrated, a little
The problem with this is that the actual container holding the Ni is made of
steel, not copper. The Copper is a second outer container form
The write up says: "the reaction chamber is made of stainless steel" so I would assume that the
water flows around the outside of it.
Ron
--On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 4:17 PM -0700 Jones Beene
wrote:
It looks to me like the water inlet goes through the center of the reactor.
This would lik
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 6 Apr 2011 10:23:32 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Where are the electric fields that would cause electromigration? There are
>no fields in copper pipes as far as I know.
...different metals form junctions. Two junctions at different temperatures will
form a thermoc
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 6 Apr 2011 06:09:13 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Even hydrinos would result in an isotopic imbalance.
Actually, the ratio of Ni62/Ni64 is about the same as the ratio of Cu63/Cu65, so
adding a proton to Ni62 to give Cu63 and to Ni64 to give Cu65 would
automatically
It worth noting that nickel and copper are often found together in mineral
deposits.
Harry
>
>From: Harry Veeder
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Sent: Wed, April 6, 2011 5:08:27 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nickel and Copper
>
>
>oh it is not surprising that they are claiming copper is produced, since even
In the Essen report, Fig. 3, you see the hydrogen pipe at the top of the
cell, and the power lead for the resistance heater at the bottom (the red
wire). I am assuming both of pass through the outer copper sleeve, and then
into the inner cylindrical stainless steel container. Granted, that might be
On 04/06/2011 11:28 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
> >From Stephen
>
> ...
>
>
>> It's more likely that Levi is in on the gag than that
>> transmutation from nickel to copper produced "natural"
>> isotope ratios in the ash. The former merely requires
>> the assumption that a few hum
Oh no I agree with Jed.
Notice if it is just a SS cylinder inside some flowing water, it would be very
easy to scale up. Just a bigger "pipe" or even a pond with lots of Cylinders
down inside .
D2
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 7:38 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Su
Jones Beene wrote:
It looks to me like the water inlet goes through the center of the reactor.
> This would likely be a copper pipe along the axis, surrounded by the nickel
> powder.
I gather Ed Storms also thinks that is the configuration, with the water
flowing through the center of the bulge
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> What do you want from life?
>
> "Well, you can't have that, but if you're an American citizen you are
> entitled to:
> a heated kidney shaped pool,
> a microwave oven--don't watch the food cook, . . ."
I am turning in for the night and let t
What do you want from life?
"Well, you can't have that, but if you're an American citizen you are
entitled to:
a heated kidney shaped pool,
a microwave oven--don't watch the food cook, . . ."
T
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> I wonder if any of the other components of stainless steel might facilitate
> the reaction
Dunno. But the SS "pit" could contain any radioactivity from
isotopes. This could allow Rossi to say that the ECat is not
radioactive because it i
I wonder if any of the other components of stainless steel might facilitate the
reaction
harry
>
>From: Jed Rothwell
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Sent: Wed, April 6, 2011 8:26:53 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish physicists on the E-cat: \"It\'s a nuclear
>reaction\"
>/ The used powder contains
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> For a 50 cc volume, the internal sphere would have a radius of about 1
> inch (2.8 cm).
That should be 2.3 cm internal radius. Sloppy math!
T
All this being said, how do you avoid the isotopic ash in a true N
reaction as Mr. Beene originally points out?
T
yes, I would think that a practical design would be to have a single large
flow system with several of the stainless reactors down inside the flow
instead of having a hundred widen copper tubes to make.
I also think that the additive is something that keeps the Ni surface
reduced and supports
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Yeah, and that is probably similar to the 12 kW reactor; but, the heat
> variance over that amount of material required 5 heaters to control.
> The much simplified single heater with a smaller output is actually an
> ingenious modification, IM
Harry Veeder wrote:
http://www.buzzle.com/articles/what-is-stainless-steel-made-of.html
This does not say how much copper impurity is found. It must be less than
0.15% I guess. Allowable Impurities for stainless steel are listed in ASTM
A276 but you gotta pay for that.
- Jed
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Dennis wrote:
> The patent drawings sure looks like cylinder type vessel containing Ni and
> surrounded by flowing water.
Yeah, and that is probably similar to the 12 kW reactor; but, the heat
variance over that amount of material required 5 heaters to control.
The
http://www.buzzle.com/articles/what-is-stainless-steel-made-of.html
Harry
- Original Message
> From: Terry Blanton
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Wed, April 6, 2011 7:55:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish physicists on the E-cat: \"It\'s a nuclear
> reaction\"
>/ The used powder c
Dennis wrote:
I thought of it as a stainless steel cylinder (easier to machine) inside
> the [wider] part of the copper tubing with water flowing around it.
>
Yes, that is my understanding. In Fig. 4 you see a bulge in the copper pipe.
Inside that bulge is a second, stainless steel chamber hold
The patent drawings sure looks like cylinder type vessel containing Ni and
surrounded by flowing water.
Dennis C
--
From: "Terry Blanton"
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 5:53 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swedish physicists on the E-cat: "It's a nucl
It's probably something like nanonickel and buckyballs. :-)
T
I thought of it as a stainless steel cylinder (easier to machine) inside the
widen part of the copper tubing with water flowing around it.
>From the temperature curves, I think that the external heater gets the system
>up to around 60C where the reaction starts to proceed. My guess for the
>"se
Maybe the catalyst isn't so very secret.
T
"Keep your powder dry, men."
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Has anyone seen such a sphere?
>
> Nothing seen by me indicates that level of sophistication. Small spheres are
> tricky to make and the outward of H2 pressure would possibly be more of a
> problem than a central tube.
>
> An axial copper tube,
Watson, bring me my Dremel tool!
T
Dennis,
that is also how I interpreted the new paper but Jones then indicated there
may also be copper inside the reactor. In either case I am convinced the
initial
Reaction is due to changes in nano geometry which causes change in
suppression level that disassociates any molecular hydrogen or f
Has anyone seen such a sphere?
Nothing seen by me indicates that level of sophistication. Small spheres are
tricky to make and the outward of H2 pressure would possibly be more of a
problem than a central tube.
An axial copper tube, even having lost mass to migration, would withstand a
fairly hig
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Because that is not what I envision. I envision a SS reactor vessel
> enclosed within a copper sphere attached to a copper pipe. The
> reactor vessel is suspended inside the copper and the water passes
> outside the SS reactor. Water does
that is also the way I see it. Otherwise you would need two copper
components - inner Cu tube, stainless and then the outer Cu tube - A
stainless reactor chamber inside a widen part of one copper component would
be much easier to machine.
Dennis C
-
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> It looks to me like the water inlet goes through the center of the reactor.
> This would likely be a copper pipe along the axis, surrounded by the nickel
> powder. Copper ions would immediately start to migrate when heat was applied
> to the out
It looks to me like the water inlet goes through the center of the reactor.
This would likely be a copper pipe along the axis, surrounded by the nickel
powder. Copper ions would immediately start to migrate when heat was applied
to the outside of the reactor. Did you enlarge the pictures? There is
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
>> IN SHORT - the migratory copper itself appears to be the "secret" catalyst,
>> but only after it alloys with the nickel to form this super catalytic alloy
>> - which almost splits the hy
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> IN SHORT - the migratory copper itself appears to be the "secret" catalyst,
> but only after it alloys with the nickel to form this super catalytic alloy
> - which almost splits the hydrogen molecule on contact. Unbelievable !
Well, then, it c
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Well. The one problem is that the paper is not accessible except by fee.
Copyrights and all that. You can read the abstract
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/la981339q
Romanowski is a nickel alloy expert. This finding is not new but was
generally
At 03:34 PM 4/6/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Alan J Fletcher
wrote:
Because the horizontal arm was NOT inspected
"unwrapped", we have to assume it contained FAKE material.
The 6 hour test was NOT long enough to eliminate all of the
fakes.
What on EARTH is THAT supposed to mean?
Alan J Fletcher wrote:
> Because the horizontal arm was *NOT* inspected "unwrapped", we have to
> assume it contained *FAKE* material. The 6 hour test was *NOT* long enough
> to eliminate all of the fakes.
>
What on *EARTH* is *THAT* supposed to mean? The horizontal arm contains a
mini-Rossi d
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v314.php
Preliminary Conclusion:
Because the horizontal arm was NOT inspected
"unwrapped", we have to assume it contained FAKE
material. The 6 hour test was NOT long enough to eliminate all of
the fakes.
the Cu would have to go through the water and then through the stainless
steel to get to the powder.
Dennis C
--
From: "Harry Veeder"
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 4:11 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Swedish physicists on the E-cat: "It's a
Indeed from the link provided Akira it says:
"The reactor itself, which is loaded with the nickel powder and secret
catalysts
pressurized with hydrogen, has an estimated volume of 50 cubic centimeters (3.2
cubic inches).
The reactor is made of stainless steel."
Harry
- Original M
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Clue: no, it's not the Colonel Mustard with the lead pipe - but the paper's
> lead researcher is a Polish alloy expert named Romanowski, and you want to
> look at Fig 9 on page 8 ...
Jesus, Jones! F9P8 of which? This:
http://www.nyteknik
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:53: SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote
[snip]Focardi doesn't know the exact composition of the catalyser used in
the reactor (in addition to nickel powder) or what it does exactly but he
suspects that it's a chemical compound promoting nickel's adsorption of
hydrogen in atomic form rathe
The first paragraph (Google translation) attacks Fleischmann and Pons,
saying:
"No significant similarities with the Pons and Fleischmann flop of 1989
could be discerned."
What a jerk! I would send him a nasty note saying he should read the
literature, but I am trying to sweet talk him into givin
SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Seems new to me.
Proper link to the relevant bit:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vof.se%2Faktuellt.php%23notis472
Original article in Swedish:
http://www.vof.se/aktuellt.php#notis472
- Jed
oh it is not surprising that they are claiming copper is produced, since even
on
the standard peoridic table nickel and copper are neighbors.
Stellar fusion can account for the lighter elements up to and including iron,
but how the heavier elements arose is not so clear. Indeed, most of the hea
On 2011-04-06 23:01, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vof.se%2Findex.php
Seems new to me.
Proper link to the relevant bit:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vof.se%2Faktuellt.php%23notis472
I don't remember having seen this (March) report by Essen from the
Swedish Skeptics Society (Discusses the NYteknik interview)
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vof.se%2Findex.php
(Sorry if it's a duplicate)
SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
> According to Rossi's latest plans, the megawatt reactor is going to be made
> of not 100, but 300 smaller units similar in size to those seen in photos .
> . .
Yup. But I started writing that text before I learned that. Besides a 10 x
10 array is easy to envision, wher
On 2011-04-06 22:06, Jed Rothwell wrote:
A few weeks ago I mentioned that I think ganging together many small
Rossi devices will call for some complicated engineering. Perhaps it
will slow down the development of the 1 MW reactor. I'm sure that 100
units can be coordinated but it may take a team
I meant to say the screw holes would be used to admit hydrogen into the
cells, or evacuate them. Maybe they would be used to admit nitrogen to shut
the thing down.
100 individual hydrogen pressure hoses running to 100 cylinders would be an
engineering headache but I suppose something can be worked
A few weeks ago I mentioned that I think ganging together many small Rossi
devices will call for some complicated engineering. Perhaps it will slow
down the development of the 1 MW reactor. I'm sure that 100 units can be
coordinated but it may take a team of engineers some time to design such a
sys
I pushed "send" too soon. I meant to add a critical point:
The 18-hour test proved that the device does, in fact, output 15 kW, so I do
not see how people can still argue that the first test was actually putting
out far less than that because of wet steam. I think the second test proved
that the f
Jeff Driscoll wrote:
As far as I can see, they are still making mistakes by using a
humidity meter to test for the mass fraction of vapor to liquid water
- also known as "steam quality
As everyone here remembers, this was disputed after the first test. I
would not know, but I have found on-l
This question made me check out Walter Russell's Periodic Chart of the
Elements, and in there, Nickel and Copper are right next to eachother in
the 7th octave, listed as isotopes. On top of Nickel there's Cobalt, and
below Copper there's Zinc, Gallium and Germanium.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/
Has it ever be explained, using stellar nucleosynthesis theory, why naturally
occurring nickel and copper have the isotopic distribution that they have?
Harry
>
>From: Stephen A. Lawrence
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Sent: Wed, April 6, 2011 10:33:19 AM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Swedish physicis
As far as I can see, they are still making mistakes by using a humidity
meter to test for the mass fraction of vapor to liquid water - also known as
"steam quality
from their technical paper:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n
Jones,
Yeah, I love that it looks like it could have been made in a garage of spare plumbing parts. It has
a much less sophisticated geometry than I expected too; seems too simple even compared to the MAHG
I started to replicate (it also had a copper vessel).
Keeps life interesting; you are a
On 2011-04-06 19:10, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Really! Does he say why he doesn't want to know?
The only speculation that makes any sense to me might be for personal
safety reasons.
He doesn't, and I don't think he seriously means that either, but maybe
he simply doesn't want to j
Jones sez:
...
> Wow, gotta luv that the Rossi apparatus does work - apparently - but doesn't
> it
> just scream "cheap"? Off the rack at K-Mart cheap...
Heh! It will probably result in an extra month of delays over at DoE
getting their s**t in gear... particularly if they deem to look at the
l
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Blanton
>
>> If the reactor vessel is stainless steel, is the Cu migrating through
> the walls of the vessel to contaminate the Ni?
>
> That is probably net necessary. It looks to me like a copper pipe,
This is a smaller version of the ECat: 4 kW vs 12 kW. It appears to
have a single heater. Rossi says he will make 300 of these for his MW
generator. It is simpler and safer according to the inventor.
Allegedly, in 2.5 months, a version of the ECat consumed (transmuted,
whatever) 100g of Ni and
>From Akira
> On 2011-04-06 18:58, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
>
> I'm quite sure Focardi told that he doesn't know the composition (nor he
> wants to know - he added). By catalyzer I mean the unknown compound which
> enhances the nickel-hydrogen reaction.
Really! Does he say why he does
Confirmed. Focardi doesn't know the composition.
--
From: "OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson"
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 6:58 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sergio Focardi interviewed (not yet in english!)
From Akira,
...
- Focardi doesn't know th
I'll update my "Proof" paper shortly.
Not much that can happen in 50cc, though .
On 2011-04-06 18:58, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Maybe something got lost in the translation here, but find it
surprising that Focardi apparently doesn't know the composition of the
catalyzer used in Rossi's reactor. Are we to assume Rossi hasn't told
him?
I'm quite sure Focardi told
>From Akira,
...
> - Focardi doesn't know the exact composition of the catalyser used in the
> reactor (in addition to nickel powder) or what it does exactly but he
> suspects that it's a chemical compound promoting nickel's adsorption of
> hydrogen in atomic form rather than molecular.
Maybe so
The copper isotope ratios reported here contradict those from Rossi's blog
published data.
In his blog post titled Experimental Results he states the Cu63/Cu65 ratio is
1.6 after transmutation.
The isotope results reported by the swedish observers seems very suspicious to
me.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Wormus
> So what causes the "electromigration"? As far as I can see all he has in
> there are some resistive heaters.
Ron - Possibly it could be related to either low level magnetic fields or emf
associated with the heaters, or else galvanic corrosion bet
Hello group,
A *very* interesting (revealing many previously unknown details, to tell
the truth I'm not sure if he was supposed to disclose them all)
three-part audio interview in italian to Sergio Focardi by a local web
radio has been submitted here:
http://radio.rcdc.it/archives/sergio-foc
>From Jones
> From: Terry Blanton
>
>> If the reactor vessel is stainless steel, is the Cu migrating through
> the walls of the vessel to contaminate the Ni?
>
> That is probably net necessary. It looks to me like a copper pipe, for heat
> transfer, may go into the reactor itself. Plus, if I am no
Jones,
So what causes the "electromigration"? As far as I can see all he has in there are some resistive
heaters.
Ron
--On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 6:15 AM -0700 Jones Beene
wrote:
To be clear:
Yes the reaction is NOT chemical, but it is NOT the fusion of nickel and
hydrogen.
1)
My guess is that the Aux is to pre heat the water flowing into the system and
the other external clamp on heater is for "control".
Put those two seem to be the only external electrical connections (other than
the thermocouples)
Dennis C
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 9:41 A
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
> If the reactor vessel is stainless steel, is the Cu migrating through
the walls of the vessel to contaminate the Ni?
That is probably net necessary. It looks to me like a copper pipe, for heat
transfer, may go into the reactor itself. Plus, if I a
Looking at the pictures, it seems to be fairly simple mechanically. The
chamber is 50cc and not 1 liter as we were made to believe.
My question is: does the water pass through the bed of Nickel?
I don't see anything in the pictures that would indicate that there is a
separate path for the wa
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
*
* Where are the electric fields that would cause electromigration? There
are no fields in copper pipes as far as I know.
In the photos I am looking at, from this page - one resistance heater
labeled "auxiliary" goes directly into a copper pipe. You may ne
Stephen,
Urgent Addendum:
Just to be clear on this point, my speculation was pertaining to
whether you were now suspicious of the HEAT measurements. In truth I
must admit the fact that you seem to be questioning the isotopic
shifts, not the actual HEAT measurements. My apologies if I have
misinte
>From Stephen
...
> It's more likely that Levi is in on the gag than that
> transmutation from nickel to copper produced "natural"
> isotope ratios in the ash. The former merely requires
> the assumption that a few humans are acting unusually
> stupid (which happens frequently). The latter requ
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Essentially this is why I concocted the 'quark power' concept presented
> recently.
I don't think you can sell the quark power theory to Hawking. :-)
T
-Original Message-
From: Steven V Johnson
> Regarding the hydrino theory, my first impression would be to conclude...
> that not enough hydrogen was consumed (into hydrinos) that would explain the
massive amount of heat recorded.
Right on! Steven. You get points for having been thinki
If the reactor vessel is stainless steel, is the Cu migrating through
the walls of the vessel to contaminate the Ni?
T
The energy release of the hydrino producing reaction is 50 MJ/mol hydrogen
gas. The prefered reactionproduct seems to be H1/4.
See http://www.blacklightpower.com/papers/Eng%20Power050410S.pdf
So if 25 kWh is produced (90 MJ) this should correspond to 1.8 moles of H2
gas = 3.6 grams.
Peter va
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> He *said* they measured the isotopes.
>
> He said, specifically, the ratios for both nickel and copper didn't vary
> from natural abundances: "The isotopic analysis through ICP-MS *doesn’t
> show any deviation from the natural isotopic composition* of nickel and
> c
One of the great things about this is that there is so much new
information here, it is taking me all morning to read and understand the
reports and photos. Usually, when I get a new paper, it is all stuff
that I have heard before. It is either a re-hash of previous reports, or
a repetition of
On 04/06/2011 10:23 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Jones Beene mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote:
>
> The mundane reason for the appearance of iron an copper is
> electromigration.
>
>
> Where are the electric fields that would cause electromigration? There
> are no fields in copper pipes as
>From Jones:
> The mundane reason for the appearance of iron an[d] copper
> is electromigration.
Seems like a reasonable conclusion to draw.
I must apologize for not being sufficiently clear as to what I was
really questioning: What is generating the massive amount of heat? I
gather the responsi
On 04/06/2011 08:20 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> The Facts: There is evidence of the presence of copper but that is all. If
> it were formed by transmutation some of it should be radioactive. In fact
> there is a mundane explanation for the presence of copper
Dead on. In fact, as I recall, folks on
Jones Beene wrote:
The mundane reason for the appearance of iron an copper is
> electromigration.
>
Where are the electric fields that would cause electromigration? There are
no fields in copper pipes as far as I know.
Kullander does say ". . . it’s remarkable that nickel-58 and hydrogen can
f
On the pictures in the article:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29
)
it is seen that the copper tubes are corroded from the outside , probably
due to the high temperature of the reaction.
As Jones says it is very l
Andrea Selva wrote:
Jed, I don't understand if you ever saw any of the pictures of the two test
> assets or any of the clips of the January one.
> If your answer is yes maybe your eyes are note telling you the truth.
> Everybody can easily see that the output probe (the one attached to the
> data
On 04/06/2011 03:01 AM, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
>
>
> Kullander: Both measurements show that the pure nickel powder contains
> mainly nickel, and the used powder is different in that several
> elements are present, mainly 10 percent copper and 11 percent iron.
> The isotopic analysis through ICP-M
To be clear:
Yes the reaction is NOT chemical, but it is NOT the fusion of nickel and
hydrogen.
1)The copper and iron are incidental, and come from electromigration.
2)The ash would be isotopically different otherwise, and radioactive.
3)Since it is not radioactive nor
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo