RE: {Spam?} question on acl [7:75258]

2003-09-11 Thread Robert Perez
You would have to do each host individually as: access-list 110 deny tcp host 192.168.2.2 host 192.168.1.254 eq 23 You cannot choose only even addresses with any kind of command. Atleast not that I am aware of. -Original Message- From: Yong Wee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

RE: Aux port and modem connectivity [7:74909]

2003-09-09 Thread Robert Perez
] Subject: RE: Aux port and modem connectivity [7:74909] line aux 0 exec-timeout 0 0 modem InOut What about modem out? Martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Robert Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 5 september 2003 17:49 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Aux port

Aux port and modem connectivity [7:74909]

2003-09-05 Thread Robert Perez
Guys, If I have a modem connected to the AUx port can can I harden the cisco so that it can make calls but will never be able to receive any calls? Here is kind of my config.. Thx,. interface Async65 bandwidth 28 ip address 192.168.116.64 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dia

RE: IPSEC/GRE [7:74668]

2003-09-03 Thread Robert Goralski
Hello Jens: Look under the tunnel interface and negate the keepalive statement. no keepalive [seconds[retries]] Regards Robert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74735&t=74668 -- **Please support Group

Re: What is the difference between 100BaseT and 10 [7:74587]

2003-09-03 Thread Robert Goralski
90 Mb. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74736&t=74587 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy

PRI to PRI - HELP !!! [7:74433]

2003-08-28 Thread Robert Bentley
Hi I'm slowly getting my teeth into the world of cisco - but I am struggling to set up the following. I have two Cisco 2611XM routers, each with a serial card and a PRI card. I have set up the serial interfaces with a 30 bit IP address range, and the 2Mb serial link works well. I would now like to

Re: Dumb Question [7:74315]

2003-08-25 Thread Robert Edmonds
l honesty, it's probably a lot easier, but if you're a CLI officianado, a GUI can really screw with your mind. Robert """Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter""" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ""Aspiring Cisco Gurl"" wrote in

RE: hsrp default route in ospf [7:74017]

2003-08-15 Thread Robert Kimble
That makes sense. I managed to find the same answer after doing some reading on Cisco's site. I appreciate the info. Thanks Zsombor! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74026&t=74017 -- **Please support GroupStudy by

RE: hsrp default route in ospf [7:74017]

2003-08-15 Thread Robert Kimble
Why would that not make sense? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74023&t=74017 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription inf

hsrp default route in ospf [7:74017]

2003-08-15 Thread Robert Kimble
Howdy all, I have two 6509's with hsrp running between their msfc's. OSPF is advertising the ip addresses of interfaces of the routers instead of the virtual ip that I set up in hsrp. Since hsrp fails over faster than ospf, I was wondering if there is a way to have ospf advertise the virtual ip

RE: Books for CCNP [7:74010]

2003-08-15 Thread Robert Kimble
I've always used cisco press, exam cram, and routersim. Although, I used the Sybex book for the remote access test and it was definitely top notch. I know a couple people who used the sybex book for the bsci and they swear by it. As far as practice tests go I would recomend transcender. Hope th

RE: ip helper address [7:73533]

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Perez
/it always has to go on the router int closest to the host. -Original Message- From: Janik James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ip helper address [7:73533] Assume that you have a two routers between your host and dhcp ser

Re: Loopback Interface [7:73305]

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Edmonds
t; another interface, as Dave said. > > >>> MADMAN 8/5/03 1:25:25 PM >>> > I think your thinking way too hard about this;) A loobback is > nothing more than a logical interface as opposed to a physical > interface. As far as the routing process is concerned i

Re: can't login to nt domain [7:73861]

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Edmonds
We had this exact same problem on our network. Turned out to be a corrupt WINS database. However, since I am not in charge of the servers, and the guy who was still (1 year later) has not repaired the WINS database, the solution for me was to add a line in the lmhosts file pointing to the domain

CCNP Equipment Lis [7:73983]

2003-08-14 Thread Robert N Myhre
testing on that useless 700 router? 3) What switches are now being tested on? Has the CatOS been dropped or is the 5500 still valid? Thanks -- Robert N Myhre CCIE #9837 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73983&

hsrp and icmp redirects [7:73972]

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Kimble
Ok. I'll try to explain what happened as best as I can. We have two 6509's each with an msfc and until last night we were only using the msfc on one of them. Last night I brought up the second msfc and set up hsrp between the two. everything worked great here in the office last night. However,

udld [7:73730]

2003-08-14 Thread Lopez, Robert
Anyone out there make it a common practice to implement UDLD on Cat 6509 GigE uplinks? TIA, Robert LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is

RE: c4224 problems [7:73517]

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Kimble
D'oh! You're right. I had to recover the password when I first got the switch and I forgot to set the conf reg back to 0x2102. My mistake. Thanks for the help! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73532&t=73517 -- **P

c4224 problems [7:73517]

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Kimble
I know these are discontinued and I would do well not to use them, but The company I work for has 3 of them laying around and they want me to build a test network using them. I've been playing around with one and I can't seem to save the running config?! I've read the software config documen

Re: Loopback Interface [7:73305]

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Edmonds
Rusty, was there a URL here that was truncated? If so, I would very much like to see it. n_guide_chapter09186a0080087da4.html#3302 ""Wilmes, Rusty"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > n_guide_chapter09186a0080087da4.html#3302 > > -Original Message- &

Re: Port redirection on a PIX [7:73065]

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Edmonds
would appreciate it as I > really need to get this fixed. Thanks. > > > ""Robert Edmonds"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > With regards to these two lines: > > > > > static (inside,outside) tcp interface ftp 192.168.0.1 ftp net

RE: Pix 506e, 1721 router [7:73521]

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Perez
you said vpn pix-2-pix, so how does the router come into play? If he is just a transit device you need not do anything. -Original Message- From: zak spaniol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pix 506e, 1721 router [7:73521

hsrp icmp redirects NEVERMIND [7:73974]

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Kimble
Wow. It must've been a late night last night. I figured out the problem. It had nothing to do with icmp. Thank you! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73974&t=73974 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from

Re: Loopback Interface [7:73305]

2003-08-05 Thread Robert Edmonds
takers? Robert ""p b"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > terminate iBGP sessions on Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73538&t=73305 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purch

ISDN SNMP Question [7:73250]

2003-07-30 Thread Robert Perez
Hi all, I want to monito a cisco 2600 isdn to determine when it is up. Is there a MIB I can watch that changes when the ISDN comes up and then changes back to the original value when it goes down? Thx. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73250&t=73250 ---

Re: Port redirection on a PIX [7:73065]

2003-07-28 Thread Robert Edmonds
With regards to these two lines: > static (inside,outside) tcp interface ftp 192.168.0.1 ftp netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 > static (inside,outside) tcp interface www 192.168.0.1 www netmask > 255.255.255.255 0 0 I believe they should read: static (inside, outside) tcp interface OUTSIDE ftp 192.

Re: Speaking of PIX Translation Problems... [7:72573]

2003-07-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
John, That's not so bad. I have been aware of that fact for quite some time, but still continue to forget to issue a clear xlate about half the time. So which is worse, ignorance or stupidity? Robert ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

IPSec/GRE VPN w/ ISDN Backup and EIGRP [7:72424]

2003-07-16 Thread Robert Rattiner
I have set up an IPSec/GRE VPN with EIGRP and am having problems getting the ISDN backup to work correctly. Has anyone been able to do this successfully. Thanks, Rob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72424&t=72424 --

RE: console port problem [7:72298]

2003-07-15 Thread Robert Perez
whats the problem?? -Original Message- From: star.7 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: console port problem [7:72298] i have a problem with my console port of 2500 router as well as 1900 switch the speed settings are ok ca

Re: Visio Stencils [7:72054]

2003-07-10 Thread Robert Edmonds
I have the old file with the 3508 series if you need it. Just let me know where to e-mail it. Robert ""Elijah Savage"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Does anyone have visio stencils for Cisco 3500 series switches like the > 3508's and 3548's, I u

RE: ping the PIX inside from an external interface [7:72052]

2003-07-09 Thread Robert Perez
You can only ping the internal int on the pix if you are sitting on the inside. You would also need to issue the command "telnet x.x.x.x inside". You can never cross an interface to get to another interface on a pix for the purpose of ping or telnet. You must always use the interface closest to

Cisco catalyst 3548 and Radius [7:71991]

2003-07-07 Thread Robert Perez
Hi all, I am configuring Radius on a cat 3548 and I do not have the global config "radius" command available. Anyone know what the commands ought to be to create a server, key, etc.. Normally it is Radius-server key, radius-server host.. Can't figure it out.. I have IOS 12.0(5.2)XU Messa

Cisco Routers and RSA secureid [7:71715]

2003-07-01 Thread Robert Perez
Anyone know if I Can I use RSA SecureID FOBS to authenticate access to a Router versus using tacacs+ to do the authentication?? So basically the user tries to Telnet to a router to do config changes. I want their ID to be auth'd against an RSA server. | ---+ | Bob P

RE: crypto maps and IPSEC tunnels [7:71341]

2003-06-25 Thread Robert Perez
I would do your more specific ACL entry and make sure your inverted mask is correct such as 192.1.1.0 0.0.0.255. Once you do that then issue the following commands to reset the tunnel and force a renegotiation. Clear crypto ipsec sa clear crypto isakmp sa That should do it... -Original Me

RE: CCDA Study material [7:71111]

2003-06-25 Thread Lopez, Robert
e exam for dqos - this upcoming Friday... Robert -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 1:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDA Study material [7:7] CiscoNewbie wrote: > > Great write up. Thanks. > >

Benefits of BGP holding the routing tables [7:70788]

2003-06-17 Thread Robert Perez
Could anyone explain the benefit of using BGP and holding the routing tables on your router versus having the ISP hold the tables and you just receive a default-route? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70788&t=70788 ---

Email access over the Internet [7:70750]

2003-06-16 Thread McCallum, Robert
is a simple solution and its just my company politics which is causing me the problems. Any help will be much appreciated. Robert McCallum CCIE #8757 01415663448 07818002241 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7075

RE: Errors on Ethernet Interfaces [7:70733]

2003-06-16 Thread Robert Perez
I'm thinking duplex mismatch or bad patch cable -Original Message- From: Poulin, Darnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Errors on Ethernet Interfaces [7:70733] Hey folks. What do you people think about all of the Interface Re

RE: mac and IP addresses on a 1900 [7:70514]

2003-06-11 Thread Robert Rattiner
try show mac-address-table Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70522&t=70514 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAI

Re: Catalyst 3550 [7:70449]

2003-06-10 Thread Robert Edmonds
Is that output from a 3550? I know the command is the same on most Cisco gear, but my 3550 doesn't show whether it's SX or LX. It shows everything else, though. Robert ""Scott Chau"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi Tim, > > DNWB-008-AS01#sh

Routers and HSRP [7:70285]

2003-06-06 Thread Robert Perez
Does anybody see an issue setting up HSRP to work with a 3725 and 7206 rtr or do the routers have to be the same model? For example, DS-3 pipe in the 7206 and 4 T-1's in the 3725 T-1's for failover with BGP on all the pipes including ds-3 or would I need either two 7206's or 3725's?? thx..

Networkers [7:70123]

2003-06-04 Thread McCallum, Robert
Anybody going to networkers in Orlando this year? If so I'll see you there. Robert McCallum CCIE #8757 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70123&t=70123 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscripti

Please explain the numbers in the source-bridge statement? [7:70092]

2003-06-04 Thread Robert Perez
interface TokenRing0 ip address 192.168.34.3 255.255.255.0 ring-speed 4 source-bridge 9 3 23 _-- What do all these mean? source-bridge spanning Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70092&t=70092 -- FAQ, list archive

Please expalin the numbers in the source-bridge statement?? [7:70090]

2003-06-04 Thread Robert Perez
interface TokenRing0 ip address 192.168.34.3 255.255.255.0 ring-speed 4 source-bridge 9 3 23 < What do all these mean? source-bridge spanning Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70090&t=70090 -- FAQ, list archi

Re: Dynamic Route Graphs...... [7:69738]

2003-05-30 Thread Robert Edmonds
My question to Tom and Raj is, where can I get it? I am not a programmer (yet, working on that), so scripts like these that are free are always a welcome site. If you guys are willing to share what you have (your livelihood doesn't depend on it) let me know. Robert ""Tom Mar

Re: Am I over my head guys? [7:69746]

2003-05-30 Thread Robert Edmonds
, wireless, etc, much of it for the first time. And, like some of the other folks, I am looking for challenges all the time. GOOD LUCK! Robert ""B Rudy"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hey guys, I just got an offer to become a 2nd senior network engineer for > th

Packet retransmit questiion [7:69715]

2003-05-29 Thread Robert Perez
Hi all, I have a question on the CCIE 350-001 test. I have heard differing opinions on this but when traffic crosses a WAN connection and there are problems who does the retransmit?? Host or RTR?? 1.) In Frame relay there is a line hit or corrupt packet on the WAn, who retransmits, should be the

Re: VPN 3000 concentrator question [7:69676]

2003-05-29 Thread Robert Edmonds
To the first part of your question, yes, that is it basically. If you are using the Cisco VPN client, you will enter the group name and password under the "Authentication" tab. You can also use the VPN client that is built into Windows, in which case you do not need the group name and password, b

Re: Leased line/1721 problem [7:69573]

2003-05-27 Thread Robert Edmonds
I had almost the exact same problem with a T1 line. In order to convince the telco, I replaced the WIC cards at both ends and then called them and told them I didn't care what it took, but they better fix the line. They then came out and performed an on-site test again, and lo and behold, there w

Re: Layer 3 and 2 question. [7:69576]

2003-05-27 Thread Robert Edmonds
I'm not sure I understand the question correctly, but I do know that it is never a good idea to duplicate IP addresses on your network. This can only lead to trouble. My advice would be, don't do it. ""Nuurul Basar"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I am planning to configured both my

RE: Debug display to VTY [7:66762]

2003-04-03 Thread Robert Perez
, 2003 1:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Debug display to VTY [7:66762] Hi Robert, This is what I have. Router#show log Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 messages rate-l Console logging: level debugging, 413770 messages logged Monitor logging: level debugging, 285

RE: Debug display to VTY [7:66762]

2003-04-03 Thread Robert Perez
Do a "show log" and see if logging is disabled You might need to do a "logging on" -Original Message- From: James Gosnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Debug display to VTY [7:66762] Um, probably a silly one for you all.

Re: regulations [7:66267]

2003-03-26 Thread Robert Edmonds
I can't help too much with the banks, but I used to run the network for hospital and supported several doctor's offices that used our network. The main thing you need to worry about there is that you meet the requirements outlined in the HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act o

Re: Redistribution question [7:66071]

2003-03-25 Thread Robert Edmonds
Thanks a lot Daniel. That was exactly the type of solution I was looking for. Robert ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Try > passive-interface default > no passive-interface s0 (or whatever) > Works for EIGRP. Not sure about RI

Redistribution question [7:66071]

2003-03-24 Thread Robert Edmonds
I have a network with approximately 20 VLANs, running EIGRP as my routing protocol. One of my VLANs, VLAN12, runs RIP for connectivity to another organization. The others do not need to receive RIP updates. So, the solution I came up with is to make the other 19 VLANs passive interfaces so that

Re: IGRP Metric calculation [7:66062]

2003-03-24 Thread Robert Edmonds
Try the following Cisco link on IGRP metrics: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk826/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080 09405c.shtml ""Tim Champion"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > When calculating the metric of an IGRP route (with non-default 'K' values) > which load and reliabil

RE: Confused over NAT [7:65926]

2003-03-21 Thread Robert Perez
You would need to have routing out on the internet that says how to get back to those addresses or what would do is get rid of the nat pool and nat using the Serial interface address. -Original Message- From: James Gosnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:55 AM To:

RE: PIX Questions [7:65806]

2003-03-20 Thread Robert Perez
Newer versions of the PIX OS have more routing protocol support such as OSPF. Vs. 6.3 -Original Message- From: Ben W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX Questions [7:65806] The PIX is not a router, however it does have

Re: Difference on L3 switching of Cat4500 and Cat6500? [7:65832]

2003-03-20 Thread Robert Edmonds
Actually, Multiprotocol Label Switch is MPLS. MLS is MultiLayer Switching. This refers to a switch that can do not noly what Kiran said about L3 switching, but can make forwarding decisions based on higher level protocols, such as tcp, udp, etc. ""Kirankumar Patel"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL

Re: Open http: traffic on firewall... [7:65755]

2003-03-19 Thread Robert Edmonds
d for 2.2.2.2 (the outside address of your web server) to the proper interface. ip route 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 ethernet 0 Your setup may demand something a little different, but in general I think this should get you started. Robert ""SMAN"" wrote in message news:[EM

Cisco Instructor - CCNA Class [7:65742]

2003-03-19 Thread Robert Raver
have three routers and a switch. Thanks, Robert Raver Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65742&t=65742 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report m

Re: Finding device on network via cisco switch [7:65670]

2003-03-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
Start at your core and work your way out. For example, if you have a core switch connected to other switches at the distribution or accesss layers via trunks, do a show mac-address-table (or show cam dynamic for CatOS switches) and see which trunk port it is coming from. Then go to the next switc

OT: Linux recommendations [7:65671]

2003-03-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
I know this is the Cisco forum, but I know many of you folks use Linux on your networks, so I am asking for your recommendations. I have a Cisco network with a PIX firewall in place. I would like, if possible, to put a Linux server on the network to act as a proxy server/internet monitoring compu

Re: CCIE [7:65426]

2003-03-14 Thread Robert Raver
That is the laugh I needed on this Friday. Thanks, Robert Raver - Original Message - From: "Juan Blanco" To: Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 6:34 AM Subject: CCIE [7:65426] > Team, > I got this from a friend but I not sure if you have seen this or not but > only s

RE: OT - CDP: Is it treated as a 'vulnerability' in your world? [7:65297]

2003-03-13 Thread Lopez, Robert
In a Cisco IP voice environment, cdp must be enabled to communicate aux-vlan, power and QoS issues. I don't think that there is any workaround with this, is there? Robert -Original Message- From: Ian Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 5:40 AM To: [

Re: Problem with Cicso VPN Client 3.6.3.B-k9 connectin [7:65152]

2003-03-12 Thread Robert Raver
John, What version did you roll back to? Was the stateful firewall Always on checked? Do you have an firewall, system utilities software on this machine? Thanks, Robert Raver Cisco Systems Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (801) 736-3939 Ext. 55664 Hrs. 6-2:30 MST - Original Message - From

Re: to the moderator [7:65037]

2003-03-11 Thread Robert Edmonds
Priscilla for sharing their obvious experience. This free site helps make my (and I'm quite sure, other folks') job a lot easier. Robert ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >just wondering who is the moderator here? > >yesterday i could

Bandwidth calculations [7:65008]

2003-03-10 Thread Robert Perez
Anyone know how the conversion techniques for converting bits, bytes, kilobits, etc, to calculate bandwidth usages? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65008&t=65008 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http:/

PIX firewall port redirection [7:64533]

2003-03-05 Thread Robert Perez
Can the following be done?? Inside int: 10.1.1.0 outside int: 172.16.1.0 static (inside, outside) 10.1.1.0 10.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.155 static (inside, outside) tcp 10.1.1.1 telnet 207.208.203.21 telnet netmask 255.255.255.255 Since these are overlapping, will it work? Thx **

Re: default router for 2950 switch [7:64489]

2003-03-05 Thread Robert Edmonds
I believe the command you are looking for is "ip default-gateway . Since the 2950 is an IOS based switch, the set commands don't apply here. ""J. Johnson"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > All, > > Is there a way to set a default router for a 2950 switch? Apparently other > 2900 switch

Re: NAT on Cisco Catalyst 3550 [7:64239]

2003-03-03 Thread Robert Edmonds
I checked the Network Address Translation Catalyst Switch Support Matrix on Cisco's website and confirmed that the 3550 does not support NAT. ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I don't believe the 3550 supports NAT. There was a recent discussion about > this on the IE

Re: Silly EIGRP question [7:64259]

2003-03-03 Thread Robert Edmonds
If show ip eigrp doesn't give you what you're looking for, I think you're going to have to break down and use debug. If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me. ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I know this question sounds silly, but I can't for the life of

ACS Database [7:64007]

2003-02-27 Thread Robert Perez
Hi All, With Cisco Secure ACS and the PIX Firewall if I use the PIX to auth VPN client connections with the shared password and then use the TACACS+ Server to ask for credentials will that info be passed to and from the client in clear text format over the internet? PAP?? I have not configured th

Re: VPN client conflict [7:63951]

2003-02-27 Thread Robert Edmonds
I'm not sure what the actual cause or fix is, but I had the same problem. I ended up uninstalling the AT&T client to get it to work. ""supernet"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have AT&T VPN client on my laptop. It stopped working after I > installed Cisco VPN client. Is there any c

Eigrp neighbor loss [7:63925]

2003-02-26 Thread McManus, Robert BGI SDC
I was hoping someone could help out with a problem I am seeing. I just enabled logging of eigrp neighbor changes for the first time and noticed that there are constant neighbor changes going on over our WAN/LAN. First guess was the hello timers but since it is on the LAN this is not the issue. So

Re: new access list problem [7:63715]

2003-02-25 Thread Robert Edmonds
lculator at the following link. http://www.boson.com/promo/utilities/wildcard/wildcard.htm Hope that helps. Robert ""Jason Steig"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello i networks 192.17.73.0 - 192.17.77.0 > > is there anyway to deny these networks with one

Re: new access list problem [7:63715]

2003-02-25 Thread Robert Edmonds
Couldn't you just use the wildcard mask 0.0.4.255 to deny 192.17.73.0 - 192.17.77.0? I used the Boson wildcard mask calculator to check this, and it gave me those networks. ""Andrew Larkins"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > the first access-list will not work. > The second one will als

Re: L3 Switching Huh???? [7:63728]

2003-02-25 Thread Robert Edmonds
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching and routing in one platform. The main advantage here is speed. The way it works is, in a switch you have some kind of layer 3 routing engine (aka route processor, or RP). For example, the MSFC2 (Multilayer Switch Feature Card 2) is one of the opti

Re: cisco 2950 and trunk negotiation [7:63466]

2003-02-21 Thread Robert Edmonds
ineer told me. However, this brought up the question, "What about EIGRP?" He assured me that some of the proprietary stuff like EIGRP, where there is a real tangible benefit to using it, will stay. Robert ""John Brandis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: layer 3 switch [7:63407]

2003-02-20 Thread Robert Edmonds
Just set the 3550 as a VTP client in your current domain and it will just be a layer 2 device. Or order it with the SMI software load rather than the EMI. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello All: > > Question - By default, out of the box, will a L3 switch simply

Re: VLAN routing [7:63412]

2003-02-20 Thread Robert Edmonds
By default a trunk port will carry all VLANs, which it will need to do in the setup you have illustrated. If you prune the other VLANs at the second switch, the users in VLANs 3 and 4 on the third switch will be cut off. ""Happy World"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].

Re: VPN Client help!! [7:63333]

2003-02-19 Thread Robert Edmonds
Don't quote me, but I do believe the access list is necessary as it actually tells the router which traffic to encrypt. PERMIT =ENCRYPT and DENY=DON'T ENCRYPT. I think the following Cisco link may help answer your question best. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121

Re: PIX enable SYN Floodguard by default on outer int? [7:63314]

2003-02-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
Check the following link and see if it has the answer to your question: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_configuration _guide_chapter09186a008008d313.html ""Richard Campbell"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi.. Group, > > May I kn

Re: Layer 3 switching [7:63304]

2003-02-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
I'm fairly certain the answer to your first question is no, the switch will not be intelligent enough to switch it to the appropriate port automatically. The reason is that the switch must go through a layer 3 device to get from one VLAN (aka IP subnet) to another. I don't think this is a real is

Can this nat be done on a pix?? [7:63281]

2003-02-18 Thread Robert Perez
Please help, I went with PIX instead of CP and I cannot find a way to do this now!!! Setup PIX 515E-ur - | PIX inside PIX intf2| | 192.168.25.0/24 10.178.25.25/16 | |

RE: ISDN Dialer Watch on 4500 [7:62423]

2003-02-04 Thread Robert Perez
And you have a dynamic routing protocol watching the routes and it is able to see when the one you specify disappears? Could you post your config? -Original Message- From: Nelson Herron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IS

Nat question [7:62379]

2003-02-03 Thread Robert Perez
Hi all, I have the following config and want to know if there will be a problem since two route-maps point to the same pool? If I get a successful FTP connection and then try the HTTP connection the router drops the packet. Can a pool only be used by one nat statement? ip nat pool to-home 208.24

In a pix or router, can you nat the Source IP based on dest [7:62277]

2003-01-31 Thread Robert Perez
*** | Bob Perez | | Intercept Payment Solutions | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 100 West Commons BLVD | | New Castle, DE 19720 | | Phone: 302.326.0700 | | Cell: 302.420.6883

RE: IOS version question [7:62108]

2003-01-29 Thread Robert Perez
Look here. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/620/roadmap.shtml -Original Message- From: Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IOS version question [7:62108] on the 1700 routers, Which is the latest version of these two:

RE: debug commands [7:62107]

2003-01-29 Thread Robert Perez
logging on logging buffered informational Access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 any log access-list 101 permit ip any any Apply that ACL to an interface in the direction traffic will be flowing and when that host traverses the Router you can do a show log and it should have created an entr

trunking 10/100 access ports for avaya ip phone [7:62045]

2003-01-28 Thread Lopez, Robert
nt. Input from Avaya had me make the access port a trunk, make the data vlan the default vlan and apply the aux vlan to the port as well. It does work - my question is in regards to performance and/or design best practices. TIA Robert LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message

Need help with PIX natting [7:62044]

2003-01-28 Thread Robert Perez
I am using 3 interfaces, Inside 100 and Eth2(Vendor1) 90 and eth3(Vendor2) 80 I want all traffic leaving the inside going to ethernet 2 to not have nat. So I have setup statics as follows: access-list vendor1-outbound permit tcp host 204.26.258.32 host 254.254.254.254 eq ftp access-list vendor1-

Re: Cisco VPN Client 4.0 -- BETA [7:61589]

2003-01-22 Thread Robert Raver
will support AES -New authorization features(such as integration with RSA SoftID.) Thanks, Robert Raver - Original Message - From: "Charles Riley" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:04 PM Subject: Re: Cisco VPN Client 4.0 -- BETA [7:61589] > Robert, > >

Cisco VPN Client 4.0 -- BETA [7:61589]

2003-01-22 Thread Robert Raver
Hey, For all those interested the 4.0 VPN Client(BETA) will be in March/April. This VAN Client is totally rebuilt and has some very nice new features. Thought I would just let everyone know. Thanks, Robert Raver Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61589&

RE: PIX to Router -Urgent [7:61450]

2003-01-22 Thread Robert Perez
All depends if you setup natting within the Linux box. If not the IP will stay the same and never change. -Original Message- From: Guruprasad Sanjeevi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX to Router -Urgent [7:61450]

RE: Connecting WIC-1DSU? [7:61487]

2003-01-21 Thread Robert Perez
yes you can do it. It uses pins 1,2 4,5. So you make a crossover cable with each pair 1 2 2 1 4 5 5 4 -Original Message- From: Mike Mihalas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Connecting WIC-1DSU? [7:61487]

RE: vlan on a 3548 catalyst [7:61398]

2003-01-21 Thread Robert Perez
Message - From: "MADMAN" To: Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 1:31 PM Subject: Re: vlan on a 3548 catalyst [7:61398] > I don't have a 3548 to look at but does it supoort the "interface > range" command? if so yes you do have the "one swoop" capab

FW: cisco 2600 rtr [7:61399]

2003-01-20 Thread Robert Perez
"Bob Perez" wrote in message news:... > I have a 2620 rtr and would like to debug the traffic of a particular > ip but the only way I know to do it is byu the following: debug ip > packet 101 where 101 is an acl that says ermit ip any any. > > Is there a better way to do this so that it only lo

vlan on a 3548 catalyst [7:61398]

2003-01-20 Thread Robert Perez
"Bob Perez" wrote in message news:... > Can I assign multiple ports to a vlan in one swoop rather than each > one individually? > > IOS on a 3548XL Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61398&t=61398 -- FAQ, list arch

RE: BGP load balancing questions [7:61095]

2003-01-15 Thread Robert Fowler
umber(which wasn't there previously). And sure enough incoming traffic started leveling out between the two ISPs. Thanks for all the responses! Robert -Original Message- From: Captain Lance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >