On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 04:38:02PM -, Andy Woolley wrote:
>
> Well, it certainly seems to be pointing to MySQL.com alright.
>
> Although the domain name registrant is still NuSphere and DNS still
> appears to be handled by NuSphere's command the IPAddress it
> resolves to is definitely that o
Hi,
Well, it certainly seems to be pointing to MySQL.com alright.
Although the domain name registrant is still NuSphere and DNS still appears
to be handled by NuSphere's command the IPAddress it resolves to is
definitely that of MySQL.com.
Hmmm, I certainly hope this is justice and not just car
Too bad it's not your list to make that decision, but
Monteys
Ruben
mysql - the database written and owned by MYSQL AB
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:13:15PM +0100, Mark Tiramani wrote:
> >
> > > Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
> > > your discussions off this li
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
> MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
> information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
> next meeting.
>
> Britt...
Britt, thanks for the update. The neutral tone and lack of
substanti
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
> MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
> information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
> next meeting.
>
> Britt...
Britt, thanks for the update. The neutral tone and lack of
result ma
John Birrell wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:13:15PM +0100, Mark Tiramani wrote:
> >
> > > Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
> > > your discussions off this list. It is none of our business. By
> > > all means, tell us the result.
> >
> > This discussion most
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:13:15PM +0100, Mark Tiramani wrote:
>
> > Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
> > your discussions off this list. It is none of our business. By
> > all means, tell us the result.
>
> This discussion most certainly is our business.
No it'
> Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
> your discussions off this list. It is none of our business. By
> all means, tell us the result.
This discussion most certainly is our business. I would appeal to both MySQL AB and
NuShphere to keep
discussions as public as i
John Birrell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
> > MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
> > information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
> > next meeting.
> Since these issues are between two private companies,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
> MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
> information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
> next meeting.
Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
your discussions
MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
next meeting.
Britt...
--
D. Britton Johnston 603-578-6707 Nashua
Chief Technology Officer 781-280-4954 Bedford
NuSphere Corporation 781-280-4600 Main
14
Absolutely great! You are so keen and brave - I wouldn't dare to
and some others obviously neither!
We need people who calm things down to make negotiations and an
agreement possible, that's absolutely true, but we also need
people to emphasize the frontiers to make a correct agreement
possible i
they are not bad and
give you something to read in the restroom.
MJM
- Original Message -
From: "Van" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Meltzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: mysql.org
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:17:31AM -0400, Bob Hall wrote:
>
> I think I've made it clear that I'm not enamored of NuSphere's
> recent actions, which I think are remarkably bone-headed. At
I'm afraid the emotions aroused by recent events have stripped
away my thin veneer of reasonable civility
[ database table sql ]
Van wrote:
>
> Michael Meltzer wrote:
> >
> > thought the list might want to know, this has been picked up by a trade
> > magazine, I got a copy of "interactive week" in sail mail today. (In my best
> I'd have never caught that but for the list. Thanks. Wonder what th
Van wrote:
>
> Michael Meltzer wrote:
> >
> > thought the list might want to know, this has been picked up by a trade
> > magazine, I got a copy of "interactive week" in sail mail today. (In my best
> I'd have never caught that but for the list. Thanks. Wonder what the audience
> for that si
Michael Meltzer wrote:
>
> thought the list might want to know, this has been picked up by a trade
> magazine, I got a copy of "interactive week" in sail mail today. (In my best
> sarcastic voice)As they say in Hollywood "Any Publicity is good as long as
> your spell the names right". Found a web
>
> MYSQL.NET
> XMYSQL.COM
> MYSQLPHP.COM
> PHPMYSQL.COM
> MYSQL-PHP.COM
> MYSQLHOST.COM
>
> -S
>
>
Aside from being incorrect about the process of tradmarking in the
US and the ability to defend a trademark while awaiting registry,
all these above websites are not claiming to be the off
>
> I think you see evil people, conspiracies and other unwanted stuff when
> in fact there are only misunderstandings and opposing viewpoints.
>
> I'm with Bob Hall on this one. Excellent statement Bob!
>
> -S
>
>
Their is no conpsirisy, there is only one company trying to
steel
thought the list might want to know, this has been picked up by a trade
magazine, I got a copy of "interactive week" in sail mail today. (In my best
sarcastic voice)As they say in Hollywood "Any Publicity is good as long as
your spell the names right". Found a web version if any one wants a look.
Thomas J Keller wrote:
> The more I think about this, the more convinced I am that someone needs to
> offer the following observations:
> It is unfortunate that so many people within this community are so eager to
> assume the worst about a company, simply because they ARE a company. Not all
At 21:28 01-07-19, you wrote:
> >
> > > the same time, a NuSphere-controlled mysql.org doesn't strike me
> > > as a disaster, provided they can do it with out shooting
> > > themselves in the foot, as they are doing now.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Nah
> >
> > There using it as a marketing ploy to dup the p
Fact
MYSQL owns their trademark
Fact, what NuShpere brought form MYSQL is irrelevant as loing as they
are infrringing on the MYSQL Trademark...and they were going to do WORSE
until the public heat.
Until they apologies fo the GPL violation, and then the Trademark
infringment, they are pound sc
>
> > the same time, a NuSphere-controlled mysql.org doesn't strike me
> > as a disaster, provided they can do it with out shooting
> > themselves in the foot, as they are doing now.
> >
>
>
> Nah
>
> There using it as a marketing ploy to dup the public.
>
> The should have released their G
Dear folks at NuSphere,
Thank you for your response to our open invitation. We disagree with a
number of your statements, but we look forward to having a phone contact
with you on Friday.
Marten Mickos
(database,sql,query,table)
--
> the same time, a NuSphere-controlled mysql.org doesn't strike me
> as a disaster, provided they can do it with out shooting
> themselves in the foot, as they are doing now.
>
Nah
There using it as a marketing ploy to dup the public.
The should have released their GPLed extentions on
NuSh
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:10:20AM -0700, Michael Collins wrote:
> It seems to me that the bottom line is that any outcome that results
> in there being a fork in the development of MySQL (with the result
> being two completely different types of MySQL), or in NuSphere
> retaining control of th
First, I support mySQL and Open Source community. Maybe you can fight them
with their own weapon. They have made some extra applications based on
mySQL, and they sell it. You can create same applications as Open Source.
-
Befor
It seems to me that the bottom line is that any outcome that results
in there being a fork in the development of MySQL (with the result
being two completely different types of MySQL), or in NuSphere
retaining control of the mysql.org domain should be vehemently
rejected by the MySQL community.
Werner is correct in encouraging all to make up your own mind.
And, it is always possible that Orwellian "DoubleSpeak" is an
ingredient of these public statements and posturing.
But, a great distinction must be made here, and not tie the
idea of "DoubleSpeak" to a fear of manipulation, unless
you
>As you are aware, we are forming a not-for-profit corporation to
>focus on building and supporting a larger MySQL development
>community and promoting MySQL. The mysql.org domain is expected
>to be transferred to that organization. NuSphere has taken the
>lead and is covering the costs of for
[permission to come aboard, sql database query table]
"Gerald R. Jensen" wrote:
>
> I wouldn't be concerned about this being discussed here on the list. After
> all, we are talking about Open Source.
>
> Gerald Jensen
-
Right, Mr. Jensen. My historical bent takes me further.
Britt:
I've read all of the posts regarding the controversy between MySQL AB and
NuSphere.
Not being a participant, I can't know all the details of your relationship
with MySQL AB, so I can only judge this in light of my own dealings with
them. Michael Widenius and David Axmark have always condu
t needed to
> establish the >further agreements that MySQL AB
> > seeks. We note that public statements have been made >after the
> invitation, statements that are not in the spirit of >the invitation.
>
> >Your willingness
> > to return to resolving our issues in a
t;Your willingness
> to return to resolving our issues in a business-like >fashion would be
> welcome.
- Original Message -
From: "Britt Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:59 PM
Su
Re: Open Invitation to NuSphere and Progress
NuSphere accepts MySQL AB's invitation to discuss resolution of
our business issues. NuSphere and MySQL AB have already spoken via
phone and confirmed discussions will commence on Friday, July 20th.
NuSphere would welcome a fresh approach by MySQL A
http://www.nusphere.org
Is available to register but I don't now why you would what to ;o).?
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 July 2001 10:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mysql.org (comments to old mes
Monty:
You started MySQL as a database server derived from msql several years ago, and,
you made it quick. You made it a bunch of other things, but, what's most
important is that you made it quick. You made it stable. Quick is good.
Stable is better. When both are paired, it's a pure win. T
Open Invitation to NuSphere and Progress
The people at MySQL AB would like to invite you, NuSphere Corporation
and Progress Software Corporation, to talks on neutral soil for the
purpose of resolving our disputes. We propose to meet on Wednesday 18
July 2001 and continue for as long as we need,
I hate to differ with you here, John... but please check the following URL
and notice the price tag on it --
http://www.redhat.com/products/software/linux/7-1_standard.html
RedHat is betting on, correctly so, that users in general will not spend
the time and effort to download over 100 meg of d
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:59:14AM -0700, Michael Collins wrote:
Thank you, Michael, for accidentally posting this. :)
> At 3:10 AM -0400 7/14/01, Britt Johnston wrote:
> >Well, what a mess. It is regretable that this legal issue
> >needs to be aired so publically that was certainly not my
> >p
> 1) While they do point out that they are not affliated, and
> provide a link to MySQL AB, they do not state why this is
> relevant, or why someone might WANT to go to MySQL AB.
Hmmm.. The NuSphere people may not be saying very much on
this list, but they're certainly listening in on what'
Well, I have gone and looked more closely at mysql.org.
I am forced to confess that I find several disheartening "features" at this
site. I am unwilling at this juncture to typify these issues as deliberate or
ill-intentioned, but I will say that NuSphere needs to make a concerted,
immediate
Monty et al and fellow list people,
I've been following this thread with interest for the last couple days, have read all
the postings (unfortunate flames included), and my opinion has generally been: "well,
there's been an unfortunate break down in communication between MySQL and NuSphere,
I'
Just to clarify the U.S. trademark point raised here ...
The fact that it is in the mail, in progress, or whatever is really
immaterial.
It is not at all unusual for the formal application for trademarks, service
marks, patents, copyrights, etc. to come months or even years after the
product's i
Andy, a clarification below
Andy Woolley wrote:
> > I see one HUGE difference between these support sites and .net,
> > in regards to .com: Every one but .net clearly state that
> > this is a product of MySQL AB, tell people about and make
> > very explicit links mysql.com.
> The impression
> I see one HUGE difference between these support sites and .net,
> in regards to .com: Every one but .net clearly state that
> this is a product of MySQL AB, tell people about and make
> very explicit links mysql.com.
The impression I get from the .org site, is that they are promoting a
product
Guus,
Thanks for your good suggestions. Some clarifications below.
Guus Leeuw jr. wrote:
> From: Dipl.-Inf. Guus Leeuw jr.
> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 03:21:32 +0200
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marten Mickos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Our interpretation is that even unde
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin Farnsworth
> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 4:56 AM
> Hassan:
>
> I respectfully disagree with your suggestion that such a site
> would spread confusion and give discredit to MySQL.
>
> I think it
Hi,
Sorry.. can't keep my mouth shut..
A few comments on the legal matter: GPL has been spoken about more then
enough here..
Trademark: If no license or agreement exists which allows nusphere to use
MYSQL AB's trademark it's probably illegal. One could think of situations
where it might be pe
BAUMEISTER Alexandre writes:
> Michael,
>
>
> It's years now that I use Mysql, post/read the mailing list, try to
> help you solving bugs, testing new features (like InnoDB currently).
>
> Why ? Because I really like Mysql, GPL licence and the way you work !
>
> What NuLsphere is doin
Reposting because of annoying filter.
On 15 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Your message cannot be posted because it appears to be either spam or
> simply off topic to our filter. To bypass the filter you must include
> one of the following words in your message:
>
> database,sql,query,tabl
hassan el forkani wrote:
>
> "First: take it to court. Potentially expensive, and probably not good for
> public relations for either party" probably the only sentence that makes
> sense in this "affaire"
>
> from a mysql user point of view, nusphere's move is completely amateur
>
> i can't s
"First: take it to court. Potentially expensive, and probably not good for
public relations for either party" probably the only sentence that makes
sense in this "affaire"
from a mysql user point of view, nusphere's move is completely amateur
i can't see any intelligent motivation for it, th
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marten Mickos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Our interpretation is that even under the interim agreement,
> > the operation
> > by NuSphere of mysql.org would have been a trademark violation.
>
> Then, Marten, tell us what the statu
community,
open source, gpl, tld's..
these are long, long discussions, some pertinent, though not to
this valuable list. i've read many opinions, respect some,
but these are for lawyers, not hackers (in linus' sense of
the word). nevertheless, there is a message for us nerds:
let's keep it open!
Regarding the recent thread on NuSphere. ( Jeapardy style so you don't have
to read it again)
GPL violation or not, part of my decisions are always based on morals (hard
to find these days). Anyone trying to capture an audience using anothers
name is un-ethical and un-moral. My business decisi
> -Original Message-
> From: Marten Mickos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Our interpretation is that even under the interim agreement,
> the operation
> by NuSphere of mysql.org would have been a trademark violation.
Then, Marten, tell us what the status is of the trademark
app
Thomas, thanks for your suggestions. A few clarifications below.
Thomas J Keller wrote:
> Marten Mickos wrote:
> > In response to the posting by Thomas J Keller of Britt Johnston's text, I
> > feel I have to come with the following comments.
> > (The quoted text marked with "> >" is by Britt
The more I think about this, the more convinced I am that someone needs to
offer the following observations:
It is unfortunate that so many people within this community are so eager to
assume the worst about a company, simply because they ARE a company. Not all
corporations are Mickey$lu$h (I
>
> This is very interesting, this "Open Source Legal Resolution" ;-)
>
Indeed it is.
The thing I find most interesting, and a bit scary, is the way people
seem to pick sides.
For example - "vermin", "scum", "obscure", are just a few of the words
recently used to describe the likes of Nu
Marten Mickos wrote:
> In response to the posting by Thomas J Keller of Britt Johnston's text, I
> feel I have to come with the following comments.
> (The quoted text marked with "> >" is by Britt Johnston)
> >mysql.org has not been publically announced and it will take
> >some time for it to b
In response to the posting by Thomas J Keller of Britt Johnston's text, I
feel I have to come with the following comments.
(The quoted text marked with ">" is by Britt Johnston)
>mysql.org has not been publically announced and it will take
>some time for it to become the thriving community it
Alright. I have received Mr. Johnson's permission to share the email response
he made to me. it is included herewith for informational purposes without
comment or prejudice:
cut here
mysql.org has not been publically announced and it will take
some time for it to become the th
Britt Johnston wrote:
>
> As far as mysql.org goes, what NuSphere would like to see is a
> non-profit organization running that site - we have been consistent
> in this desire for over a year, but it has been opposed by Monty
> and David. I discussed this with Monty as recently as a few weeks
>
Sorry for the last post with no response. In my anger, I hit reply by accident.
I usually resist the urge to flame publicly.
When I first posted about this topic I thought that the domain name
issue was the only transgression, I did not realize how deep it went.
Now I feel truly disgusted by the
David Axmark wrote:
>
> > "Britt" == Britt Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Since Monty is travelling for 30 hours or so (from Australia) I will
> answer this.
[== snip, snip ==]
WOW!
Does everyone realize what is going on here? I don't know,
I consider this stuff historic. Perha
At 3:10 AM -0400 7/14/01, Britt Johnston wrote:
>Well, what a mess. It is regretable that this legal issue
>needs to be aired so publically that was certainly not my
>preference. I also will not get into a flame war, it is
>not in the best interest of mysql. I appreciate all the
>email I've rece
> "Britt" == Britt Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Since Monty is travelling for 30 hours or so (from Australia) I will
answer this.
Britt> Well, what a mess. It is regretable that this legal issue
Britt> needs to be aired so publically that was certainly not my
Britt> preference. I
Michael,
MW> What NuSphere seems to be trying to do is to get people to approve
MW> of their fork, get more people to work on it, and cause confusion
MW> among MySQL users as to where the origin of the MySQL(tm) source
MW> and documentation is. What NuSphere has done indicates that they
MW>
Justin,
I very much agree with your compliment to Jeremy for his posting.
Some notes on your posting follow.
At 14/07/01 14:03 +0200, Justin wrote:
>Personally, I could care less about the mysql.org
>domain issue. I, more or less, see it just as another
>kind of ex-officio site supporting some
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
>
[== snip, snip ==]
Jeremy:
You should be complimented for giving us a measured and
rational posting on this potentially emotional issue.
And also, it is good that Britt has clearly stated his
understanding, though perhaps a bit too late to have
prevented one of those com
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 03:10:34AM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
> Well, what a mess. It is regretable that this legal issue needs to
> be aired so publically that was certainly not my preference. I also
> will not get into a flame war, it is not in the best interest of
> mysql. I appreciate all
Well, what a mess. It is regretable that this legal issue
needs to be aired so publically that was certainly not my
preference. I also will not get into a flame war, it is
not in the best interest of mysql. I appreciate all the
email I've received with advice and/or support - thanks.
It is impo
database,sql,query,table
>
> Now most of us in/using Open Source probably do not _really_
> understand the meaning and ramifications of the GPL. We _think_
> we know, and we certainly have a "feeling" about what the GPL
> "means".
Oh Bull
Making a derived work from a GPL produc
"Michael Widenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By using mysql.org they are also violating our trademark; If we are
> not defending our trademark we may loose it.
I'm sure you and your attorneys have considered this, but for the benefit of
others on the list I'll mention that the Uniform Domain-
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:36:08 -0700
>
>I am far from a legal expert on this... but is it all that bad that
>NuSphere wishes to sell a derivative work of MySQL? Other than it competes
>with MySQL AB's busines
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I am far from a legal expert on this... but is it all that bad that
> NuSphere wishes to sell a derivative work of MySQL? Other than it competes
> with MySQL AB's business of selling their own commercial deployments of the
> package? And by that I can somewhat see wh
Hi!
> "btjones" == btjones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
btjones> I am far from a legal expert on this... but is it all that bad that
btjones> NuSphere wishes to sell a derivative work of MySQL? Other than it competes
btjones> with MySQL AB's business of selling their own commercial deploym
I am far from a legal expert on this... but is it all that bad that
NuSphere wishes to sell a derivative work of MySQL? Other than it competes
with MySQL AB's business of selling their own commercial deployments of the
package? And by that I can somewhat see why NuSphere is using the phrase
"un
> Hi!
>
>
>
> Sander> I do not deny their claim on the trademark OR domain,
> but I am
> Sander> somewhat unpleasantly surprised by the means they try
> to resolve
> Sander> this matter, and the fact that nobody in a what I
> assume is an
> Sander> internet-aware company like MySQL even
Well.
It should be an interesting Open Source convention in
San Diego later this month...
database,sql,query,table
--
Paul DuBois, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (
Hi!
I am just filling in some missing facts here.
> "Jeremy" == Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeremy> On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 01:03:19AM +0200, Sander Pilon wrote:
>>
>> Rule number one on the internet: If you have a trademark, GET THE
>> .COM, .NET, .ORG, .CC and .CX ASAP!!!
Hi!
Sander> I do not deny their claim on the trademark OR domain, but I am somewhat
Sander> unpleasantly surprised by the means they try to resolve this matter, and
Sander> the fact that nobody in a what I assume is an internet-aware company
Sander> like MySQL even considered getting the .org
Hi!
> "Tim" == Tim Endres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If anyone has any comments about how we at MySQL AB work as an open
>> source company, please write to our CEO Marten Mickos via
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we will welcome your suggestions. We are
>> totally dependent on the trust of ou
Hi,
>
>The article mentions that the Web site will confuse new users, but I
>think this one will confuse them even more:
>http://mysql.net/
>(for non-Japanese users that is).
Korean, actually.
--
Matthias Urlichs (being exceedingly helpful today)
--
Farnsworth
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:49 AM
To: Gerald R. Jensen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mysql.org
"Gerald R. Jensen" wrote:
>
> Monty:
>
> I was on the verge of authorizing the purchase of 3 copies of NuSphere's
"Gerald R. Jensen" wrote:
>
> Monty:
>
> I was on the verge of authorizing the purchase of 3 copies of NuSphere's
> PHPEd package (US$300 each) for our developers when I became aware of the
> controversy surrounding 'Enhanced MySQL' and mysql.org.
>
> The purchase order went into the round file
nomebiology.com/
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerry Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:15 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
Monty:
I was on the verge of authorizing the purchase of 3 copies of NuSphere's
PHPEd package (US$300 each) for our developers when I became aware of the
controversy surrounding 'Enhanced MySQL' and mysql.org.
The purchase order went into the round file, and Hell will freeze over
before I buy an
PeterWR wrote:
>
> Hi Van,
>
> I have no experience with Progress software.
>
> Once, Progress must have seen their approach as the right way. That they
> sonner or later see a need to change, does not approved the way it is done.
>
> In short term, the "clients" for the NuSphere are already f
://genomebiology.com/
-Original Message-
From: Gerry Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:15 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mysql.org
Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 9:50 AM
Subject: RE: mysql.org
Can't we pull the mysql.org domain from under them? Surely this breaches
domain name usage?
joel
-Original Message-
From: Mich
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: mysql.org
> PeterWR wrote:
> >
> > Then you can start wondering why one software company wants to promote
"open
> > source" by using another companys software - why is the Progress
database
&
Can't we pull the mysql.org domain from under them? Surely this breaches
domain name usage?
joel
-Original Message-
From: Michael Widenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 July 2001 06:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mysql.org
Hi!
>Enhanced MySQL(tm) is as
Dear MySQL team,
My University was considering to buy a number of licences of the
enhanced MySQL(tm) from Nusphere. However, now, we all the University IT
staff (managers, developers, designers, etc.) have decided to strongly
go up against any commercial contact with such a robber company called
Monty and all at MySQL,
I am sorry to hear about this most unfortunate situation. It is sad to see
that NuSphere have taken it upon themselves to attempt to steal your
intellectual property and try to benefit from all of the MySQL team's
hard work. My company has been licensing using MySQL for d
PeterWR wrote:
>
> Then you can start wondering why one software company wants to promote "open
> source" by using another companys software - why is the Progress database
> not good enough for NuSphere ???
>
> Best regards
> Peter
> Copnehagen Denmark
>
Peter:
Have your ever worked with Prog
Hi Monty,
When reading Your comments, I became very sorry for You and MySQL.
With almost four years experience on MySQL on Windows, I have had no
problems of any kind. You and Your people are doing a great job both on the
software and on the support - other major players could learn from MySQL w
> If anyone has any comments about how we at MySQL AB work as an open
> source company, please write to our CEO Marten Mickos via
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we will welcome your suggestions. We are
> totally dependent on the trust of our users, as everything we do are
> open source, and we are trying
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
