Re: Juniper Job Market (was: Passed CCIE Written but NOT doing [7:3962]
~ 460,000 worldwide jobs on monster.com... Non-US 'Cisco' = 919 Non-US 'Juniper' = 22 (Only in UK & Europe) Guess it will be a while for the rest of the world to realise that their Cisco certs are no good. Regards Adam Burgess Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "Bradley J. Wilson" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:44 AM Subject: Juniper Job Market (was: Passed CCIE Written but NOT doing lab) [7:3690] > Carroll Kong wrote: > > >...but also makes you wonder if the market space is really that > >big for heavy duty core work. > > > I just did an impromptu and informal search on geekfinder.com - I put in the > word "Cisco" and pulled up 905 jobs nationwide, both contract and perm. > Then I did the same search for "Juniper" and pulled up only 46 jobs. You be > the judge. ;-) > > BJ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3962&t=3962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM command to check CLP cell [7:3959]
I ran into this once, According to TAC, there are no show command to see if a clp bit is set. This was as of 12.0.7. The "show atm interface atm 1/0" command shows a lot of good stuff but no clp bit. Tony M. #6172 - Original Message - From: Cisco Newbie To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 10:56 PM Subject: ATM command to check CLP cell [7:3959] > Hi Groupstudy, > > Like to check is there any command in Cisco IOS that allows me to check > whether the cell I received has the Congestion Loss Priority (CLP) bit set? > > If not how could I find out whether the cells is eligible to be discard when > there is a congestionThru' Telco? > > > Definition of CLP: Congestion Loss Priority (CLP)---Indicates whether the > cell should be discarded if it encounters extreme congestion as it moves > through the network. If the CLP bit equals 1, the cell should be discarded > in preference to cells with the CLP bit equal to zero. > > > Thanx > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3961&t=3959 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Protocol Type 0x886F [7:3737]
One possible solution to this issue that was practiced early in the wolfpack development was to have a nic in each cluster node that was connected via cross over cable to the other node. By having a pair of NIC's dedicated to heartbeat we can avoid having the heartbeat flood the network. TTFN, Bill in Anchorage -Original Message- From: Darren Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Protocol Type 0x886F [7:3737] I ran into this same problem at my current client. Apparently this is a necessary evil in a NT clustered environment for load balancing and fault tolerancy. There are two 1,514 byte packets sent every second by default. One to the MAC of the NIC and the other to the multicast address. The size of these packets cannot be adjusted but the interval of how often they occur can. The heartbeat can be set between 100 and 1 milliseconds (default is 1000). The time period before the device is determined dead can be set between 5 and 100 (default is 5). We did the following: Registry items alivestatus (aka AliveMsgPeriod) and aliveperiod (aka AliveMsgTolerance) were changed to 1 and 9 respectively. What this meant on the network was that there were only 6 pairs of heartbeats per minute instead of 60. This should be adjusted based on the organizations tolerance of a failure. HTH Darren At 12:47 AM 05/09/2001 -0400, Andy Prima wrote: >Dear all, >I need help on protocol type 0x886F. It seems that this kind of Ethernet >Broadcast is circling around my network and I do not have a clue what it >really is. > >TIA >andy >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Darren S. Crawford Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucent.com Network Systems Consultant - CCNA, CCIE Written "Providing the Power Operable Networks." *** FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3960&t=3737 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATM command to check CLP cell [7:3959]
Hi Groupstudy, Like to check is there any command in Cisco IOS that allows me to check whether the cell I received has the Congestion Loss Priority (CLP) bit set? If not how could I find out whether the cells is eligible to be discard when there is a congestionThru' Telco? Definition of CLP: Congestion Loss Priority (CLP)---Indicates whether the cell should be discarded if it encounters extreme congestion as it moves through the network. If the CLP bit equals 1, the cell should be discarded in preference to cells with the CLP bit equal to zero. Thanx _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3959&t=3959 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cant access WAn from PC but can from router [7:3958]
G'Day all for the second time today. 2 questions: Question 1: I have a 4MB HDSL link coming into my 2503 serial 0 port. Can I check the bandwidth to make sure that this is what I really have in terms of BW... Question 2: Have configured the router to connect to the HDSL network and the ethernet network. That part is fine, I can access hosts on both networks (ping) from the router. However, when I go to my workstation and I CORRECTLY configure the IP settings, all I can access is the router and nothing over the WAN link. I made sure that there are NO ACL's going against me and I have the route static route configured correctly. What can I try now / thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3958&t=3958 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trading 2511 router and Catalyst 1924EN for Catalyst 2901 [7:3957]
Hi folks, I would like to trade my 2511(terminal server) router that comes with 16megs of flash and 16megs of dram and my Catalyst 1924 EN menu-driven switch for a Catalyst 2900 that does CatOS or a CAT5000. I don't mind paying a bit extra for the CAT5000. Please reply if interested. -Frank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3957&t=3957 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Access or Equipment for Sale? [7:3956]
Does anyone have a lab setup that they are willing to allow access to? I am between a rock and a hard place currently. I want to buy my own home lab, but I need financing. My wife and I just bought a house and as such it will be tough to fork out the cash. I have moved from a configuration role to an analyst role and I don't work on the equipment now as much as I'd like to. I am working towards my CCNP and I am hoping to either buy a good home lab at a reasonable rate (Does anyone know of any IT finance companies?) Are there any companies that will extend you credit to purchase gear? Otherwise, I would be interested in any access that one could offer. Thanks, JC Jeremy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3956&t=3956 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written preparedness [7:3951]
I guess I'd just like to add that I finished my CCDP/CCNP this year so I guess I'm in a bit of a rush to sit the written as alot of the material is still fresh. I have studied a considerable amount but taking the Boson really shook my confidence level. I read the QUE book but perhaps I should spend some more time with Doyle and Caslow... Just fishing for advice. Thanks to all for the great forum. I don't participate alot but I do read the posts (most of them) every day. Bryan - Original Message - From: "IOSNOS" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:43 PM Subject: CCIE written preparedness [7:3951] > Are the Boson CCIE written practice tests similar to the types of questions > on the real written? > If I can't do at least a 70% on the first run through of a Boson test should > I wait until I can to take the real written? > > I hate to use practice tests but I tried a trial run through on one of them > and didn't do that well so I am wondering if I should delay my written until > I can score better on the practice exams as an indicator of my knowledge up > to this point. > > Thanks! > Bryan > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3955&t=3951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Central Hub Site with six T1's. [7:3841]
Thanks for all of your help. I did not expect to get so many replys. My intention was to respond to everyone of your replys but the days just keep getting shorter, and more work is piling up on my desk. Qwest rules the land in my area, and they would be the frame relay provider in this case. Yes, I have to agree Frame Relay would be a good choice. It is a good choice because there is less equipment cost up front at the hub site, then there would be if I were to bring six PtoP T1's into that site. However, the customer has requested some interest in VoIP, and I have not listened to VoIP over Frame before so I'm not sure how well that works. Your feedback has been very helpfull. Thanks, ""SJ"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > > I hope everyone is doing well today. Since this is my first time > writing to the Cisco groupstudy I would like to say that I am glad to be a > member. As each of you I to hope to someday reach CCIE status. However, as > all of us I have to support myself and my family so work is always number > one priority. With that being said I have a work related question. I have > a customer who has 6 remote sites and a central site. Each remote site will > be tied into the hub (central site) via T1's. Frame relay is not an option > because all of the sites are within about 15 miles of the central site I > have chosen as their hub, and their bandwidth needs are such that a T1 is > feasible. So, now to my question. Which cisco router supports 6 or more T1 > connections. This customer is on a limited budget, as such I will be > deploying cisco 1750's at each remote site, however I want to tie all of the > remote sites into the central site, so I need a router with enough > interfaces to support 6 or more T1's. My goal is that each remote site will > have default routes to the central site, and at the central site I will > create static routes to the remote sites, as there is no need to run a > routing protocol in this configuration. Can anyone give me a good central > site router (cheap) that supports six or more T1 interfaces. > > > > > Thanks, > > > SJ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3954&t=3841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay backup issue (clearer understanding) (long) [7:3953]
Hi Everyone, I know i didnt give many specs on my previous question but thats because today was my first time out at the site. Here's what's going on there and i believe I have the answer now for tomorrow. They have 2 routers in the core (A=primary, B=backup). They have 18 remote sites, most of which are cisco and there are a few remote nu-bridges (never heard of these). My concern is with the cisco's for now. This is how they have it set up. Each site has a primary PVC going to core_A, and has a "backup" PVC going to core_B. I learned that the secondary is actually not a "backup" PVC, but it is always up, so if the primary fails then that one is still good and info will be sent to core_B and then from that to the destination of core_A. They are using EIGRP as the routing protocol. Now, what the issue here is: Some of the cisco branches are using the "backup" PVC initially, even though the primary PVC is not down, basically causing unnecesary traffic in between the 2 cores and taking 2 hops instead of one to core_A. I got some help tonight and was told that this was more than likely a path selection issue and setting the metrics to make the primary PVC the more feasable route should do the trick. Also, I was told that I could basically set the bandwidth statements for the 2 PVC's and make the primary's higher, therefor making it the most feasable route... Also, when doing a "show ip eigrp neighbors" command on one of the trouble branches, I noticed this: Where the uptime for the neighbor connection is, the Backup neighbor connection (pvc) would say up for like 5 weeks, and the Primary neighbor connection (pvc) would keep bouncing every 3 minutes or so (not the frame pvc...it's always up, but the neighbor connection bounces). I was told that i should check out the hello timers and make sure that they are all alike throughout the eigrp network. Sorry this one was so long guys, I just noticed that a couple of people took interest. If anybody has anything to add please feel free. Themore i go in there tomorrow with the better. I have this bad feeling that all of the above will be set correctly on the devices and I'm gonna be sitting there with my head in my ass wondering what's next ;) Have a good one all, and thanks, Mark Z. ~ CCNP, CCDA (slowly realizing what it feels like to be a paper CCNP...but working to change that) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3953&t=3953 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Load balancing alteon switches [7:3949]
The way the Alteons load balance is by a Virtual IP address. For example if you have a website called www.mysite.com with the IP address of 10.1.1.13 you would assign this IP address on the Alteon as the Virtual IP address of the website www.mysite.com . Then you would specify the real server IPs and tie the virtual IP to the real servers IP. For example if you had 2 servers with the IP address of 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.11 they would answer to the Alteon which would translate the IP address to the Virtual IP address (Which is the outside address of the website). If a client typed www.mysite .com the Alteon would get the packet and then pass it on to the real IP of one of the servers. So to answer your question, no you don't have to change any config on your Alteon because it load balances at a higher layer than switches operate. -Original Message- From: John Brandis Sent: Wed 5/9/2001 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Load balancing alteon switches [7:3949] HI gang, In a new company now, a software company !! Any way, we are telehousing a network in Intels racks here in Sydney. Intel have stated that they will provide a layer 2-3 switch, which will encompass all our load balancing needs for the application servers here. HOWEVER, the boss has stressed that he wants to put another switch (crap one) between the servers and the switch intel is providing. My question is, will the load balancing setup on the alteon switch ( i think it is a 780 by memory) need to be configured to pass frames on to the switch we implement or will it know how to pass the frames on to the correct nodes via the mac tables in both switch's. Thanks mates JohnnyB FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3952&t=3949 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE written preparedness [7:3951]
Are the Boson CCIE written practice tests similar to the types of questions on the real written? If I can't do at least a 70% on the first run through of a Boson test should I wait until I can to take the real written? I hate to use practice tests but I tried a trial run through on one of them and didn't do that well so I am wondering if I should delay my written until I can score better on the practice exams as an indicator of my knowledge up to this point. Thanks! Bryan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3951&t=3951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco HSRP Denial of Service Vulnerability [7:3534]
Check out this link. Is this kinda what you folks are talking about here? http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO54671,00.html Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Cisco HSRP Denial of Service Vulnerability [7:3534] What is Ethernet emulation? It's definitely true that Ethernet is being used across long distances, if that's what you mean. With single mode fiber-optic cabling, Ethernet can span miles. Physical access is a different story in this case, of course. The cables may actually be in public places. They would be overhead on poles or underground, I guess, though, wouldn't they? I think it would still be very difficult to wreak havoc. Physical access would be difficult, and even if you had it, network-layer hacking would be hard to achieve. Wishful thinking? :-] Thanks Priscilla At 02:27 PM 5/9/01, Kevin Wigle wrote: >However, Ethernet emulation is becoming quite popular and very price >competitive. > >I have clients who have HSRP running on what would normally be called "WAN" >ports but they are ethernet. The HSRP virtual address is visible to the >world and therefore it is vunerable. > >I agree that traditionally HSRP has been used on the inside interfaces so >therefore your vunerability is from the inside where you should have >personnel/physical security in place. > >IPSec is cool but involves more cost to deploy an IPSec capable IOS/router >if you're not already using IPSec. Perhaps this is just another reason to >do so. > >Someone also commented on the overhead of IPSec encrypting/decrypting HSRP >hellos every 3 seconds. Perhaps adjusting the HSRP timers would alleviate >this. > >But times they are a changing. The lines between LAN and WAN are blurring. >It seems Brian's solution for an access-list will be a stop gap measure for >now. > >Kevin Wigle > >- Original Message - >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer >To: >Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:38 PM >Subject: Re: Cisco HSRP Denial of Service Vulnerability [7:3534] > > > > The HSRP "exploits" aren't anything new. If you have physical access to >the > > target LAN, the ability to sniff packets, and the ability to send packets, > > of course you can wreak havoc. Not only could you send bad HSRP packets >but > > you could respond to ARPs, send bad routing protocol packets, etc. etc. > > etc. The only real solutions are physical security and hiring people you > > trust!? > > > > Also, instead of using HSRP you could use the Virtual Router Redundancy > > Protocol (VRRP) defined in RFC 2338. VRRP is the standards-track > > replacement for HSRP. > > The Security Considerations section explains authentication options, > > including using IPSec. > > > > Priscilla > > > > At 11:20 PM 5/7/01, Andy Low wrote: > > >Hi TAC, > > > > > >Anyone know of any solutions to the HSRP exploits? > > > > > >http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/2684 > > > > > >-andy- > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3950&t=3534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Load balancing alteon switches [7:3949]
HI gang, In a new company now, a software company !! Any way, we are telehousing a network in Intels racks here in Sydney. Intel have stated that they will provide a layer 2-3 switch, which will encompass all our load balancing needs for the application servers here. HOWEVER, the boss has stressed that he wants to put another switch (crap one) between the servers and the switch intel is providing. My question is, will the load balancing setup on the alteon switch ( i think it is a 780 by memory) need to be configured to pass frames on to the switch we implement or will it know how to pass the frames on to the correct nodes via the mac tables in both switch's. Thanks mates JohnnyB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3949&t=3949 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
JOKEN RING!!!CRAPPLE TALK!!! I laughed so hard I about fell out of my chair!! Anyway, Appletalk went away because it has so many scale limitations (cable range..HA! HA!) its not practical for most campus LAN's, but Joken RingI work for the State and we still implement RSRB, DLSW+, APPN, etc...to support all the IBM. I don't see the government budgetting a change any time soon! My .02c, Rob H CCNP, CCDP, MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3948&t=3908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about an Andrew 8228NP [7:3947]
Dear Group, Does anyone have any experience with an Andrew 8228NP? Thnaks , Raul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3947&t=3947 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Homepage [7:3915]
Hi group, This is a nasty VBS worm spreading around.Take precaution and delete such mail. Check out more information here http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=VBS_HOMEPAGE. A - Original Message - From: "Musick, Nancy" To: Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 7:54 AM Subject: Homepage [7:3915] > Hi! > > You've got to see this page! It's really cool ;O) > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which > had a name of homepage.HTML.vbs] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3946&t=3915 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco router 2515 and 2501 available for sale [7:3945]
Hi Everyone, I am selling the following two cisco routers: Cisco router 2515: Token ring router with 2 token ring interfaces and 2 serial interfaces. Thisrouter has 8MB of DRAM and 16 MB Flash and it has IOS c2500-jos56i-l_120-8.bin whichis capable of supporting IPSEC, Cisco router 2501: Ethernet router with 1 Ethernet interface and 2 serial interfaces. This router has 8MB RAM and 16MB Flash and it has IOS c2500-jos56i-l_120-8.bin which is capable of supporting IPSEC Including with these routers are: 2 DB-9 connectors, 2 DB-25 connectors, 2 Cisco roll-cables, 2 power cords, 2 CAT-5 cables and 1 Ethernet AUI transceiver. Furthermore,I also include 2 KENTROX CSU/DSU WITH 2 CABLES THAT CONNECT THE SERIAL INTERFACE OF THE ROUTER TO THE KENTROX CSU/DSU DEVICE. THE PRICE FOR THESE TWO ROUTERS AND ALL ACCESSORIES LISTED ABOVE IS $1000.00. I DO NOT SELL THESE ROUTERS SEPARATELY. The shipping cost will be $30.00. I accept PayPal, Money Order/Cashier Check, Personal Check (check must be cleared before items are shipped 5-7 business days), or C.O.D. Anyone interested in purchasing the merchandise please contact me privately. Thanks. Sean, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Router#sh version Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JOS56I-L), Version 12.0(8), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 29-Nov-99 19:18 by kpma Image text-base: 0x03057FBC, data-base: 0x1000ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c)XB1, PLATFORM SPECIFIC RELEASE SOFTWARE (f c1) BOOTFLASH: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-BOOT-R), Version 11.0(10c)XB1, PLATFORM SPECIFIC RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)Router uptime is 5 minutes System restarted by reload System image file is "flash:c2500-jos56i-l_120-8.bin"cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision D) with 8192K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 02310809, with hardware revision Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp). TN3270 Emulation software. 2 Token Ring/IEEE 802.5 interface(s) 2 Serial network interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)Configuration register is 0x2102 Router#sh version Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JOS56I-L), Version 12.0(8), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 29-Nov-99 19:18 by kpma Image text-base: 0x03057FBC, data-base: 0x1000ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c)XB1, PLATFORM SPECIFIC RELEASE SOFTWARE (f c1) BOOTFLASH: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-BOOT-R), Version 11.0(10c)XB1, PLATFORM SPECIFIC RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)Router uptime is 5 minutes System restarted by reload System image file is "flash:c2500-jos56i-l_120-8.bin"cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision D) with 8192K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 02310809, with hardware revision Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp). TN3270 Emulation software. 1 Ethernet Interface/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 2 Serial network interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)Configuration register is 0x2102 _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3945&t=3945 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Central Hub Site with six T1's. [7:3841]
Frame relay can be really cool when your short distances. You see, if all sites are in fact within 15mi of eachother, then they are no doubt connecting to the same Frame Relay switch. That being said, the only thing between the sites is the backplane of the switch. You could get 0 CIR and still get wire speed between the sites. FR "congestion" really is an issue mainly between FR switches, not localized to a single switch (although on a switch that isn't non-blocking I suppose you could get a little delay, but nothing like inter-switch traffic). Brian On Wed, 9 May 2001, John Hardman wrote: > Hi > > OK I am a little confused here, you say "Frame relay is not an option > because all of the sites are within about __15 miles__ of the central site I > have chosen as their hub, and their bandwidth needs are such that a T1 is > feasible." > > So does this mean that you think FR is not an option because all of the > sites are a short distance away from the hub site? > > If this is your answer... FR can be done between floors of a building, just > because they close doesn't mean that you can not use it. In fact in it is > cheaper than doing to another state for example. > > If your customer is truly short on cash to do this, then putting in 6 point > to point T1's is going to be WAY more expensive than FR. In most markets a p > to p T1 is more per month than the equivalent FR line, not to mention the > cost of a router to handle 6 T1's is going to be quite a bit more than one > that can handle 6 PVCs. > > HTH > -- > John Hardman CCNP MCSE > > > ""SJ"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hello, > > > > I hope everyone is doing well today. Since this is my first time > > writing to the Cisco groupstudy I would like to say that I am glad to be a > > member. As each of you I to hope to someday reach CCIE status. However, > as > > all of us I have to support myself and my family so work is always number > > one priority. With that being said I have a work related question. I > have > > a customer who has 6 remote sites and a central site. Each remote site > will > > be tied into the hub (central site) via T1's. Frame relay is not an > option > > because all of the sites are within about 15 miles of the central site I > > have chosen as their hub, and their bandwidth needs are such that a T1 is > > feasible. So, now to my question. Which cisco router supports 6 or more > T1 > > connections. This customer is on a limited budget, as such I will be > > deploying cisco 1750's at each remote site, however I want to tie all of > the > > remote sites into the central site, so I need a router with enough > > interfaces to support 6 or more T1's. My goal is that each remote site > will > > have default routes to the central site, and at the central site I will > > create static routes to the remote sites, as there is no need to run a > > routing protocol in this configuration. Can anyone give me a good central > > site router (cheap) that supports six or more T1 interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > SJ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- We have MOVED!! Make note of our new address!!! I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-213-4709 318-213-4701 Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net 333 Texas St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD Suite 140130 day warranty Shreveport, LA 71101 Cisco Channel Partner p: 318-212-0245 f: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3944&t=3841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPP async dial-in [7:3943]
After I config a local address pool range using 'ip local pool' and 'peer default ip address pool' command, what additional config is needed on the access router so that the dial-in client acquires the correct subnet mask ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3943&t=3943 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
Eugene, I don't think that your logic is correct. You think that just because companies aren't using something in the real world that Cisco is going to remove it from the lab. That's incorrect. A good CCIE should know Token-Ring because there is a lot of it still out there in the real world. Also if you don't know Token-Ring how are you going to learn DLSw+? Don't limit your CCIE studies to what you think is or isn't on the test. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 5G Networks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (925) 260-2724 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Eugene Nine > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > > > So whats so special about the 3920? The only thing I see is Joken ring. > I'm just starting my CCNP so IE is realistically a year out. Do you think > with the rate companies are ditching joken ring gear it will > still be on the > test by then. Crapple talk has gone pretty much gone away. > Eugene > > ""Darren Crawford"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I've said it before and I'll say it again. Get yourself a > 3920. You will > > see > > in the lab. > > > > Darren > > > > At 07:24 PM 05/09/2001 -0400, Eugene Nine wrote: > > >Here's what I have so far: > > >2524 w/ 1 4 in one module > > >2516 > > >2507 > > >2 DTE cables and 1 DCE cable > > >all above for $1843 (bought it all in one purchase because I > had $1900 to > > >spend) > > >One 10U desktop rack $55 > > > > > >Next I'm thinking one of the access servers to setup the reverse telnet > > >deal. > > >Eugene > > > > > > > > >""Fred Danson"" wrote in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > >> I have a similar setup, here's what mine cost me (without shipping)- > > >> > > >> 2501- $550 > > >> 2502- $404 > > >> 2503- $630 > > >> 2504- $540 > > >> 2511- $900 > > >> 2523- $900 > > >> Cat1800 Token Switch- $300 > > >> 4000 w/2 ethernet, 1 token, 2 serial, 4 BRI- $1000 > > >> ISDN Simulator- $1800 > > >> > > >> Total- $7024 (without shipping) > > >> > > >> I bought all of my equipment from ebay. Where are you planning on > buying > > >> yours from? Also, why would you need 4 hubs when you have a > switch? You > > >> could easily make the switch act like a number of hubs by creating > VLANS. > > >> > > >> If you have any questions, feel free to email me. > > >> > > >> Fred > > >> > > >> >From: "EA Louie" > > >> >Reply-To: "EA Louie" > > >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> >Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > > >> >Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:09:22 -0400 > > >> > > > >> >I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to > build a > > >> >CCIE > > >> >lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local > > >> >studygroup. > > >> >Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me > > >know. > > >> > > > >> >Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: > > >> > > > >> >1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) > > >> >1-2503 --- ISDN > > >> >1-2504 --- ISDN > > >> >1-2514 - dual eth > > >> >1-2515 - dual t/r > > >> >1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or > two if they > > >exist > > >> >(F/R switch) > > >> >1-2924-XL > > >> >teltone isdn simulator > > >> >3 token ring MAUs > > >> >3 token ring media filters > > >> >4 AUI-10BT transceivers > > >> >4 Ethernet hubs > > >> >6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables > > >> >a bunch of Cat5 cables > > >> >rack > > >> >rackmount kits (or shelves) > > >> >and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > > >> > > > >> >I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my > > >> >possession > > >> >by accident, > > >> >so be it ;-) > > >> > > > >> >That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the > interface > > >types > > >> >required to > > >> >practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and > iBGP/eBGP). > > >I'd > > >> >love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > > >> > > > >> >What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? > Think > > >> >it's > > >> >achievable with $4000? > > >> > > > >> >-e- > > >> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> _ > > >> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > ** > **
Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
On Wed, 9 May 2001, EA Louie wrote: > I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build a > CCIE > lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local studygroup. > Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me know. > > Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: > > 1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) > 1-2503 --- ISDN > 1-2504 --- ISDN > 1-2514 - dual eth > 1-2515 - dual t/r I think you would be much better off with a 2501, 2502 and 2513 than a 2514 and 2515.2513 is a very usefull router in a CCIE lab. > 1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they exist > (F/R switch) > 1-2924-XL Try and get a 2901 or 2926T instead of the 2924. The lab uses the Cat5000 OS, and the 2901 and 2926T both run that at an affordable price. > teltone isdn simulator > 3 token ring MAUs > 3 token ring media filters > 4 AUI-10BT transceivers > 4 Ethernet hubs > 6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables > a bunch of Cat5 cables > rack > rackmount kits (or shelves) > and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > > I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my possession > by accident, > so be it ;-) > > That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface types > required to > practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). I'd > love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > > What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? Think > it's > achievable with $4000? > > -e- > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- We have MOVED!! Make note of our new address!!! I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-213-4709 318-213-4701 Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net 333 Texas St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD Suite 140130 day warranty Shreveport, LA 71101 Cisco Channel Partner p: 318-212-0245 f: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3941&t=3908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VOIP on CCIE Lab [7:3899]
I say if your on a budget and building a CCIE lab, go with a 262x minimum. Why? Because you pick up FastEthernet (ISL, dot1q, etc) at the same time. 3620 used price is like $1200-$1500 a NM-1FE for a 3600 is like $800 yet a 2620 is only about $1200 used The 1750's FE cannot do ISL or dot1q. In fact, i would say sell the 3620 and get a 2620 or 2621, you lose nothing, and gain FastEthernet. Brian On Wed, 9 May 2001, Rashid Lohiya wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Can anyone suggest the minimum hardware requirements to practise the VOIP > bits on the CCIE labs. > > I am thinking of buying the cards, but there is so much out there and I am > truly confused. > > My friend has suggested I buy myself 2 x 1750's with DSP and FXS cards and I > should be able to configure and test end-to-end voice connectivity. He said > this was the cheapest option for me. I am just looking for a 2nd opinion. > > I have a 1000, 4 x 2500's and a 3620 router. > > Any other ideas, I am on a pretty tight budget. > > Rashid Lohiya > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 020 8509 2990 > 07785 362626 > www.pioneer-computers.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- We have MOVED!! Make note of our new address!!! I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-213-4709 318-213-4701 Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net 333 Texas St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD Suite 140130 day warranty Shreveport, LA 71101 Cisco Channel Partner p: 318-212-0245 f: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3940&t=3899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terminal Server [7:3939]
Hi, team, Simple question for you. If I take 2600series router as termial server, which network module and which kinds of cables (which part no.) I needed for reverse telnet into con port of the lab switch and router? thank you in advance, _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3939&t=3939 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Central Hub Site with six T1's. [7:3841]
Get a 7000 hands down. You can buy 7000's all day long for about 700.00 a peice. Actually alot of them I pickup for 300.00 or so each. (RP, SP or SSP, AC/Power). FSIP8 (8 port serial blades) are about 500.00 each. So for $1200 you are golden. Well, actually you would need a ethernet too, so add a EIP4 for about $200-400 (Fast Ethernet is $1000.00-$1800) You can even add an RSP7000 to the 7000, which will turn it into a 7500 basically, can use all the VIPs and PA's, just has half the backplane speed (625MBps instead of 1300MBps). I use 7000's and slam them with 32 serial ports each. Cost of the box is unreal: Cisco 7000 $ 700.00 EIP4$ 300.00 4 x FSIP8 $2000.00 So for $3k I can service 32 T1 customers, not bad Brian On Wed, 9 May 2001, SJ wrote: > Hello, > > I hope everyone is doing well today. Since this is my first time > writing to the Cisco groupstudy I would like to say that I am glad to be a > member. As each of you I to hope to someday reach CCIE status. However, as > all of us I have to support myself and my family so work is always number > one priority. With that being said I have a work related question. I have > a customer who has 6 remote sites and a central site. Each remote site will > be tied into the hub (central site) via T1's. Frame relay is not an option > because all of the sites are within about 15 miles of the central site I > have chosen as their hub, and their bandwidth needs are such that a T1 is > feasible. So, now to my question. Which cisco router supports 6 or more T1 > connections. This customer is on a limited budget, as such I will be > deploying cisco 1750's at each remote site, however I want to tie all of the > remote sites into the central site, so I need a router with enough > interfaces to support 6 or more T1's. My goal is that each remote site will > have default routes to the central site, and at the central site I will > create static routes to the remote sites, as there is no need to run a > routing protocol in this configuration. Can anyone give me a good central > site router (cheap) that supports six or more T1 interfaces. > > > > > Thanks, > > > SJ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- We have MOVED!! Make note of our new address!!! I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-213-4709 318-213-4701 Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net 333 Texas St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD Suite 140130 day warranty Shreveport, LA 71101 Cisco Channel Partner p: 318-212-0245 f: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3938&t=3841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863]
sh frame pvc will show you what the switch is throwing up Brian On Wed, 9 May 2001, Barry Kiesz wrote: > Is there a command on a Cisco router to query a FrameRelay switch to find > out which DLCIs are pointed to it? > > Barry > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- We have MOVED!! Make note of our new address!!! I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-213-4709 318-213-4701 Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net 333 Texas St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD Suite 140130 day warranty Shreveport, LA 71101 Cisco Channel Partner p: 318-212-0245 f: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3937&t=3863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP between offices [7:3769]
Don't forget the MC3810, which is quite nice as well Brian On Wed, 9 May 2001, Patrick Donlon wrote: > Depending on the number of users and simultaneous calls you want to support, > I'd suggest using 1750's with analog or BRI interfaces or move up to > 2600/3600 or higher with analog/ISDN interfaces on the HO or BO sites. Your > choice will probably be determined by what routers you already have and > whether you have PBX's. If you've got 2600/3600s then you should be able to > install voice modules with analog or isdn interfaces without to many > problems > > cheers > > Pat > > > ""Alec Smiths"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi group, > > > > I have a customer which branch offices are connecetd > > to HQ via LLs. But routers in branch offices are Cisco > > 1600. They want to make VoIP between HQ and BOs . What > > external hardware can be an efficient and economic > > solution for these guys ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alec > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- We have MOVED!! Make note of our new address!!! I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-213-4709 318-213-4701 Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net 333 Texas St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD Suite 140130 day warranty Shreveport, LA 71101 Cisco Channel Partner p: 318-212-0245 f: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3936&t=3769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Central Hub Site with six T1's. [7:3841]
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Daniel Cotts wrote: > Your central site also needs LAN interfaces. Any Internet connectivity? A > good bet would be the 3640 with two NM-4T cards assuming that you want > external CSU/DSUs. Not sure of the card and port density for built-in > CSU/DSU. Add LAN ports as needed. > Now if you don't want Smartnet and are into Jurassic networking then > consider a used 4500/4700 or a 7000. I actually find the latest 11.2 images for the 7000 to be quite good. Especially the S train (service provider). You can do all your normal stuff. Sure no CEF, but just about all else you need. Brian > > > -Original Message- > > From: SJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:32 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Central Hub Site with six T1's. [7:3841] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I hope everyone is doing well today. Since this is my first time > > writing to the Cisco groupstudy I would like to say that I am > > glad to be a > > member. As each of you I to hope to someday reach CCIE > > status. However, as > > all of us I have to support myself and my family so work is > > always number > > one priority. With that being said I have a work related > > question. I have > > a customer who has 6 remote sites and a central site. Each > > remote site will > > be tied into the hub (central site) via T1's. Frame relay is > > not an option > > because all of the sites are within about 15 miles of the > > central site I > > have chosen as their hub, and their bandwidth needs are such > > that a T1 is > > feasible. So, now to my question. Which cisco router > > supports 6 or more T1 > > connections. This customer is on a limited budget, as such I will be > > deploying cisco 1750's at each remote site, however I want to > > tie all of the > > remote sites into the central site, so I need a router with enough > > interfaces to support 6 or more T1's. My goal is that each > > remote site will > > have default routes to the central site, and at the central > > site I will > > create static routes to the remote sites, as there is no need to run a > > routing protocol in this configuration. Can anyone give me a > > good central > > site router (cheap) that supports six or more T1 interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > SJ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct > > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- We have MOVED!! Make note of our new address!!! I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-213-4709 318-213-4701 Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net 333 Texas St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD Suite 140130 day warranty Shreveport, LA 71101 Cisco Channel Partner p: 318-212-0245 f: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3935&t=3841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing ISPs [7:3831]
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Brett Johnson wrote: > Ok with 'Portable' IP address space it would be easy, but how about > with Provider provided. If we changed the ISP that doesn't provide > the space? Usually they will let you announce for 30-90 days..just depends, to help facilitate the move. Thats just courtesy but not a right. Worst case you have to renumber. What alot of ISP's will do, is renumber the core multihomed, and use address translation outbound. So the servers have the old and new IP's (or their is a translator doing the translation). This effectivly blackholes the space if it were to be re-assigned, but sometimes its the only practical reasoning. For example, a 100,000 user ISP has 100,000 users with 100.100.100.1 as their nameserver IP. So that company switches transit providers and loses the provider IP space assigned to them. So they simply take incoming requests from users to 100.100.100.1 and translate to the new 200.200.200.1 for example, and the customers know no better. You can do this inside your network. Brian > > -Original Message- > From: Charles Manafa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Changing ISPs [7:3831] > > > I assume you are going to obtain a Provider Independent IP Address space. If > so, you won't have too much difficulty changing ISP. In Europe, you have to > update the RIPE database with your routing policy details. > > CM > > > -Original Message- > > From: Brett Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 09 May 2001 16:37 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Changing ISPs [7:3831] > > > > > > If I acquire an AS number and use it with two providers what > > happens if in a > > year or two > > I decided to change one of the providers. Do I have to inform ARIN or > > acquire a new AS > > number? What would be the process of informing the Internet > > (through BGP) > > when changing > > the ISP? How about if I added a third ISP instead of changing ISPs? > > > > Thank you > > > > Brett Johnson > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- We have MOVED!! Make note of our new address!!! I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-213-4709 318-213-4701 Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net 333 Texas St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD Suite 140130 day warranty Shreveport, LA 71101 Cisco Channel Partner p: 318-212-0245 f: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3932&t=3831 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
yeah i would love to see focus put on current popular technologies, not those used by a small minority. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Wed, 9 May 2001, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > I hope I hope I hope I hope ( and all you folks who've been through the Lab > know EXACTLY what I'm talking about ;-> ) > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Eugene Nine > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > > So whats so special about the 3920? The only thing I see is Joken ring. > I'm just starting my CCNP so IE is realistically a year out. Do you think > with the rate companies are ditching joken ring gear it will still be on the > test by then. Crapple talk has gone pretty much gone away. > Eugene > > ""Darren Crawford"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I've said it before and I'll say it again. Get yourself a 3920. You will > > see > > in the lab. > > > > Darren > > > > At 07:24 PM 05/09/2001 -0400, Eugene Nine wrote: > > >Here's what I have so far: > > >2524 w/ 1 4 in one module > > >2516 > > >2507 > > >2 DTE cables and 1 DCE cable > > >all above for $1843 (bought it all in one purchase because I had $1900 to > > >spend) > > >One 10U desktop rack $55 > > > > > >Next I'm thinking one of the access servers to setup the reverse telnet > > >deal. > > >Eugene > > > > > > > > >""Fred Danson"" wrote in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > >> I have a similar setup, here's what mine cost me (without shipping)- > > >> > > >> 2501- $550 > > >> 2502- $404 > > >> 2503- $630 > > >> 2504- $540 > > >> 2511- $900 > > >> 2523- $900 > > >> Cat1800 Token Switch- $300 > > >> 4000 w/2 ethernet, 1 token, 2 serial, 4 BRI- $1000 > > >> ISDN Simulator- $1800 > > >> > > >> Total- $7024 (without shipping) > > >> > > >> I bought all of my equipment from ebay. Where are you planning on > buying > > >> yours from? Also, why would you need 4 hubs when you have a switch? You > > >> could easily make the switch act like a number of hubs by creating > VLANS. > > >> > > >> If you have any questions, feel free to email me. > > >> > > >> Fred > > >> > > >> >From: "EA Louie" > > >> >Reply-To: "EA Louie" > > >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> >Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > > >> >Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:09:22 -0400 > > >> > > > >> >I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to > build a > > >> >CCIE > > >> >lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local > > >> >studygroup. > > >> >Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me > > >know. > > >> > > > >> >Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: > > >> > > > >> >1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) > > >> >1-2503 --- ISDN > > >> >1-2504 --- ISDN > > >> >1-2514 - dual eth > > >> >1-2515 - dual t/r > > >> >1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they > > >exist > > >> >(F/R switch) > > >> >1-2924-XL > > >> >teltone isdn simulator > > >> >3 token ring MAUs > > >> >3 token ring media filters > > >> >4 AUI-10BT transceivers > > >> >4 Ethernet hubs > > >> >6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables > > >> >a bunch of Cat5 cables > > >> >rack > > >> >rackmount kits (or shelves) > > >> >and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > > >> > > > >> >I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my > > >> >possession > > >> >by accident, > > >> >so be it ;-) > > >> > > > >> >That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface > > >types > > >> >required to > > >> >practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). > > >I'd > > >> >love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > > >> > > > >> >What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? > Think > > >> >it's > > >> >achievable with $4000? > > >> > > > >> >-e- > > >> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> _ > > >> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > *** > > Darren S. Crawford > > Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services > > 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 > > Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859
RE: CCIE prep - review lab inventory andbudget [7:3908]
Please don't be offended. I have all used, second-hand gear in my home lab. I paid $400 for one 2502 and $450 for another one. I have eight routers in my home lab, several 3102's running 12.0 IOS that I picked up for $50 each. I don't dispute that if you shop around and look for the best bargains that you can get some pretty good deals. I was just commenting that based on your proposed lab equipment list, you would be hard pressed to buy all of that for only $4000. good luck tim medley Tim Medley, CCNA, CCDA VoIP Engineer iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:42 PM To: Tim Medley Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ??: RE: CCIE prep - review lab inventory andbudget [7:3908] some used gears is cheaped than what you think they would be,buddy. i got a 2503 for just about $422,and it works very well.(that price includes a pair of dce/dte cable and a AUI-10BT transceiver) "Tim Medley" 7"<~HK#: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-05-10 09:22 Gk4p84 8x "Tim Medley" JU<~HK#:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3-KM#: 4+UfVB#: VwLb#:RE: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] Unless you find some routers that "fell off a truck" I don't think $4000 will carry you quite that far. But good luck. tm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of EA Louie Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build a CCIE lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local studygroup. Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me know. Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: 1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) 1-2503 --- ISDN 1-2504 --- ISDN 1-2514 - dual eth 1-2515 - dual t/r 1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they exist (F/R switch) 1-2924-XL teltone isdn simulator 3 token ring MAUs 3 token ring media filters 4 AUI-10BT transceivers 4 Ethernet hubs 6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables a bunch of Cat5 cables rack rackmount kits (or shelves) and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my possession by accident, so be it ;-) That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface types required to practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). I'd love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? Think it's achievable with $4000? -e- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3933&t=3908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
I gotta agree with Tim... You were OK until you mentioned a budget of &4,000 Give you an idea: (2) 3102 1 Serial/ 1 Ethernet (1) 3104 (S/T 64K BRI) (1) 3204 (S/T 64K BRI) (1) 3101 2 Ethernet (2) 4500's 4 Serial/ 2 Ethernet/ 2 Token (1) Cat5k Sup1/ 12 Fast Ethernet (1) 2924 (1) 2511 (1) Teltone TLS-4 "Phone Simulator" (for Dial back-up) with a couple of US Robitics modems With the rack & cables, I probably have between $10,000 & $12,000. I still have yet to buy the ATM interfaces or the ISDN simulator. Phil - Original Message - From: Tim Medley To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:22 PM Subject: RE: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > Unless you find some routers that "fell off a truck" I don't think $4000 > will carry you quite that far. But good luck. > > tm > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > EA Louie > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > > > I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build > a > CCIE > lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local > studygroup. > Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me > know. > > Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: > > 1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) > 1-2503 --- ISDN > 1-2504 --- ISDN > 1-2514 - dual eth > 1-2515 - dual t/r > 1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they > exist > (F/R switch) > 1-2924-XL > teltone isdn simulator > 3 token ring MAUs > 3 token ring media filters > 4 AUI-10BT transceivers > 4 Ethernet hubs > 6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables > a bunch of Cat5 cables > rack > rackmount kits (or shelves) > and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > > I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my > possession > by accident, > so be it ;-) > > That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface > types > required to > practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). > I'd > love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > > What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? > Think > it's > achievable with $4000? > > -e- > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3931&t=3908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Changing ISPs [7:3831]
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Brett Johnson wrote: > If I acquire an AS number and use it with two providers what happens if in a > year or two > I decided to change one of the providers. Do I have to inform ARIN or > acquire a new AS > number? What would be the process of informing the Internet (through BGP) > when changing > the ISP? How about if I added a third ISP instead of changing ISPs? The AS is yours forever. You do not inform the Internet, you simply drop the one transit provider, and bring a BGP session up with the new one.. If you add a third transit AS, then you just bring up a session, then when you announce via that new provider everyone will be aware it is a path to you. BGP is quite simple as far as making changes and adds like that. Now changing your AS...well, that can get ugly if you have lots of peers and stuff going on :) Brian > > Thank you > > Brett Johnson > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- We have MOVED!! Make note of our new address!!! I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-213-4709 318-213-4701 Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net 333 Texas St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD Suite 140130 day warranty Shreveport, LA 71101 Cisco Channel Partner p: 318-212-0245 f: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3930&t=3831 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
Token Ring is just another stumbling block to add to the mix, but... I'm guessing you'll see a lot more Token Ring from Cisco. Appearantly- they have purchased the rights from IBM & are planning to market a 100 Meg secure Ethernet/ Token Switched network solution. Phil - Original Message - From: Eugene Nine To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:19 PM Subject: Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > So whats so special about the 3920? The only thing I see is Joken ring. > I'm just starting my CCNP so IE is realistically a year out. Do you think > with the rate companies are ditching joken ring gear it will still be on the > test by then. Crapple talk has gone pretty much gone away. > Eugene > > ""Darren Crawford"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I've said it before and I'll say it again. Get yourself a 3920. You will > > see > > in the lab. > > > > Darren > > > > At 07:24 PM 05/09/2001 -0400, Eugene Nine wrote: > > >Here's what I have so far: > > >2524 w/ 1 4 in one module > > >2516 > > >2507 > > >2 DTE cables and 1 DCE cable > > >all above for $1843 (bought it all in one purchase because I had $1900 to > > >spend) > > >One 10U desktop rack $55 > > > > > >Next I'm thinking one of the access servers to setup the reverse telnet > > >deal. > > >Eugene > > > > > > > > >""Fred Danson"" wrote in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > >> I have a similar setup, here's what mine cost me (without shipping)- > > >> > > >> 2501- $550 > > >> 2502- $404 > > >> 2503- $630 > > >> 2504- $540 > > >> 2511- $900 > > >> 2523- $900 > > >> Cat1800 Token Switch- $300 > > >> 4000 w/2 ethernet, 1 token, 2 serial, 4 BRI- $1000 > > >> ISDN Simulator- $1800 > > >> > > >> Total- $7024 (without shipping) > > >> > > >> I bought all of my equipment from ebay. Where are you planning on > buying > > >> yours from? Also, why would you need 4 hubs when you have a switch? You > > >> could easily make the switch act like a number of hubs by creating > VLANS. > > >> > > >> If you have any questions, feel free to email me. > > >> > > >> Fred > > >> > > >> >From: "EA Louie" > > >> >Reply-To: "EA Louie" > > >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> >Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > > >> >Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:09:22 -0400 > > >> > > > >> >I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to > build a > > >> >CCIE > > >> >lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local > > >> >studygroup. > > >> >Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me > > >know. > > >> > > > >> >Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: > > >> > > > >> >1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) > > >> >1-2503 --- ISDN > > >> >1-2504 --- ISDN > > >> >1-2514 - dual eth > > >> >1-2515 - dual t/r > > >> >1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they > > >exist > > >> >(F/R switch) > > >> >1-2924-XL > > >> >teltone isdn simulator > > >> >3 token ring MAUs > > >> >3 token ring media filters > > >> >4 AUI-10BT transceivers > > >> >4 Ethernet hubs > > >> >6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables > > >> >a bunch of Cat5 cables > > >> >rack > > >> >rackmount kits (or shelves) > > >> >and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > > >> > > > >> >I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my > > >> >possession > > >> >by accident, > > >> >so be it ;-) > > >> > > > >> >That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface > > >types > > >> >required to > > >> >practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). > > >I'd > > >> >love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > > >> > > > >> >What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? > Think > > >> >it's > > >> >achievable with $4000? > > >> > > > >> >-e- > > >> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> _ > > >> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > *** > > Darren S. Crawford > > Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services > > 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 > > Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 > > Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.lucent.co
=?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogUkU6IENDSUUgcHJlcCAtIHJldmlldyBsYWIgaW52ZW50 [7:3928]
some used gears is cheaped than what you think they would be,buddy. i got a 2503 for just about $422,and it works very well.(that price includes a pair of dce/dte cable and a AUI-10BT transceiver) "Tim Medley" 7"<~HK#: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-05-10 09:22 Gk4p84 8x "Tim Medley" JU<~HK#:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3-KM#: 4+UfVB#: VwLb#: RE: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] Unless you find some routers that "fell off a truck" I don't think $4000 will carry you quite that far. But good luck. tm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of EA Louie Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build a CCIE lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local studygroup. Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me know. Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: 1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) 1-2503 --- ISDN 1-2504 --- ISDN 1-2514 - dual eth 1-2515 - dual t/r 1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they exist (F/R switch) 1-2924-XL teltone isdn simulator 3 token ring MAUs 3 token ring media filters 4 AUI-10BT transceivers 4 Ethernet hubs 6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables a bunch of Cat5 cables rack rackmount kits (or shelves) and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my possession by accident, so be it ;-) That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface types required to practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). I'd love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? Think it's achievable with $4000? -e- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3928&t=3928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco routers 2515 (Token ring) and 2501 for sale [7:3927]
Hi Everyone, I am selling the following two cisco routers: Cisco router 2515: Token ring router with 2 token ring interfaces and 2 serial interfaces. Thisrouter has 8MB of DRAM and 16 MB Flash and it has IOS c2500-jos56i-l_120-8.bin whichis capable of supporting IPSEC, Cisco router 2501: Ethernet router with 1 Ethernet interface and 2 serial interfaces. Thisrouter has 8MB RAM and 16MB Flash and it has IOS c2500-jos56i-l_120-8.bin which is capable of supporting IPSEC Including with these routers are: 2 DB-9 connectors, 2 DB-25 connectors, 2 Cisco roll-cables, 2 power cords, 2 CAT-5 cables and 1 Ethernet AUI transceiver. Furthermore,I also include 2 KENTROX CSU/DSU WITH 2 CABLES THAT CONNECT THE SERIAL INTERFACE OF THE ROUTER TO THE KENTROX CSU/DSU DEVICE. THE PRICE FOR THESE TWO ROUTERS AND ALL ACCESSORIES LISTED ABOVE IS $1000.00. I DO NOT SELL THESE ROUTERS SEPARATELY. The shipping cost will be $30.00. I accept PayPal, Money Order/Cashier Check, Personal Check (check must be cleared before items are shipped 5-7 business days), or C.O.D. Anyone interested in purchasing the merchandise please contact me privately. Thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Router#sh version Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JOS56I-L), Version 12.0(8), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 29-Nov-99 19:18 by kpma Image text-base: 0x03057FBC, data-base: 0x1000ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c)XB1, PLATFORM SPECIFIC RELEASE SOFTWARE (f c1) BOOTFLASH: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-BOOT-R), Version 11.0(10c)XB1, PLATFORM SP ECIFIC RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)Router uptime is 5 minutes System restarted by reload System image file is "flash:c2500-jos56i-l_120-8.bin"cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision D) with 8192K/2048K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 02310809, with hardware revision Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp). TN3270 Emulation software. 2 Token Ring/IEEE 802.5 interface(s) 2 Serial network interface(s) 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)Configuration register is 0x2102 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3927&t=3927 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Encapsulation V-LAN [7:3798]
per-VLAN STP maybe? Andy - Original Message - From: "Gareth Hinton" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:45 PM Subject: Re: Encapsulation V-LAN [7:3798] > I would say use dot1q everywhere. > ISL will disappear at some point in the future. Big overheads compared to > dot1q. > Anybody have any valid reasons to stay with ISL? > > Gaz > > ""carmelo Garofalo"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Guys, > > i have a question for you. > > > > In my site i have to project a new network architecture. > > > > I would organize the Resource human in V-LAN. Of course all V-LAN have to > > access some services (example DNS, E-Mail, Domain Controller etc. etc) and > > not others. > > > > The NIC interfaces of my servers permit the 802.1Q encapsulation. > > > > I would make the TRUNK between switches (Catalyst 4000 - access Layer and > > Catalyst 6500 -Core Layer) with ISL trunk. > > > > Can i map the 802.1Q trunk on ISL trunk? And how could i do this ? > > > > Please indicate me link where i can find a example of this configuration ? > > > > Regards, Carmelo > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3925&t=3798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with 3620 [7:3895]
check you console settings - should be 9600 baud, 8-bit data, no parity and 1 stop bit. maybe try a different cable - you do have a flat black or light blue one don't you? Andy - Original Message - From: "Bruce Williams" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:54 PM Subject: Problem with 3620 [7:3895] > I have a 3620. It seems to power up okay, but I dont see anything on the > screen and when I type I see nothing. I dont know if it is just not booting > up or if there is a problem with the console port. I tried to boot into ROM > monitor mode, but that was also unsuccessful. > > Bruce Williams > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3924&t=3895 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
I hope I hope I hope I hope ( and all you folks who've been through the Lab know EXACTLY what I'm talking about ;-> ) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eugene Nine Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] So whats so special about the 3920? The only thing I see is Joken ring. I'm just starting my CCNP so IE is realistically a year out. Do you think with the rate companies are ditching joken ring gear it will still be on the test by then. Crapple talk has gone pretty much gone away. Eugene ""Darren Crawford"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've said it before and I'll say it again. Get yourself a 3920. You will > see > in the lab. > > Darren > > At 07:24 PM 05/09/2001 -0400, Eugene Nine wrote: > >Here's what I have so far: > >2524 w/ 1 4 in one module > >2516 > >2507 > >2 DTE cables and 1 DCE cable > >all above for $1843 (bought it all in one purchase because I had $1900 to > >spend) > >One 10U desktop rack $55 > > > >Next I'm thinking one of the access servers to setup the reverse telnet > >deal. > >Eugene > > > > > >""Fred Danson"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> I have a similar setup, here's what mine cost me (without shipping)- > >> > >> 2501- $550 > >> 2502- $404 > >> 2503- $630 > >> 2504- $540 > >> 2511- $900 > >> 2523- $900 > >> Cat1800 Token Switch- $300 > >> 4000 w/2 ethernet, 1 token, 2 serial, 4 BRI- $1000 > >> ISDN Simulator- $1800 > >> > >> Total- $7024 (without shipping) > >> > >> I bought all of my equipment from ebay. Where are you planning on buying > >> yours from? Also, why would you need 4 hubs when you have a switch? You > >> could easily make the switch act like a number of hubs by creating VLANS. > >> > >> If you have any questions, feel free to email me. > >> > >> Fred > >> > >> >From: "EA Louie" > >> >Reply-To: "EA Louie" > >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > >> >Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:09:22 -0400 > >> > > >> >I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build a > >> >CCIE > >> >lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local > >> >studygroup. > >> >Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me > >know. > >> > > >> >Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: > >> > > >> >1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) > >> >1-2503 --- ISDN > >> >1-2504 --- ISDN > >> >1-2514 - dual eth > >> >1-2515 - dual t/r > >> >1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they > >exist > >> >(F/R switch) > >> >1-2924-XL > >> >teltone isdn simulator > >> >3 token ring MAUs > >> >3 token ring media filters > >> >4 AUI-10BT transceivers > >> >4 Ethernet hubs > >> >6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables > >> >a bunch of Cat5 cables > >> >rack > >> >rackmount kits (or shelves) > >> >and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > >> > > >> >I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my > >> >possession > >> >by accident, > >> >so be it ;-) > >> > > >> >That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface > >types > >> >required to > >> >practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). > >I'd > >> >love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > >> > > >> >What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? Think > >> >it's > >> >achievable with $4000? > >> > > >> >-e- > >> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> _ > >> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > *** > Darren S. Crawford > Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services > 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 > Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 > Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.lucent.com Network Systems > Consultant - CCNA, CCIE Written > > "Providing the Power Operable Networks." > > > *** > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Rep
Re: CEF Question [7:3891]
going to stick my neck out here and have a go: show adjacency - gives, I think, the adjacent (ie connected) nodes for which there is an ARP-cache entry. This presumably is a cache of L2 FIB entries, regardless of protocol. show ip cef adjacency - gives routable prefixes (probably cef-forwardable prefixes), with next-hop addresses. presumably there are equivalent "sh ipx cef adj" commands, and maybe for other protocols also I can't find any meaningful documentation about this - seems a little vague. Adding a "detail" to the above commands gives a little more information - sh adj det seems to show on the L3-L2 mapping of connected nodes, whilst sh ip cef adj det seems to concentrate on the L3-adjaceny mappings. hth Andy - Original Message - From: "Tom Pruneau" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:19 PM Subject: CEF Question [7:3891] > What is the difference between doing the commands > > show adjacency > > and > > sho ip cef adjacency > > > How does the information which is output differ? > What are they telling you? > > omm > Tom Pruneau > Trainer Network Operations > > GENUITY > 3 Van de Graff Drive Burlington Ma. 01803 > 24 Hr. Network Operations Center 800-436-8489 > If you need to get a hold of me my hours are 8AM-4PM ET Mon-Fri > > -- - > This email is composed of 82% post consumer recycled data bits > -- - > > "Once in a while you get shown the light > in the strangest of places if you look at it right" > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3923&t=3891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Buying Cisco Gears... [7:3922]
Is anyone here who passed the CCIE lab and want to sell his/her home lab enquipment? I am buying used Cisco gears. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3922&t=3922 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
Unless you find some routers that "fell off a truck" I don't think $4000 will carry you quite that far. But good luck. tm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of EA Louie Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build a CCIE lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local studygroup. Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me know. Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: 1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) 1-2503 --- ISDN 1-2504 --- ISDN 1-2514 - dual eth 1-2515 - dual t/r 1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they exist (F/R switch) 1-2924-XL teltone isdn simulator 3 token ring MAUs 3 token ring media filters 4 AUI-10BT transceivers 4 Ethernet hubs 6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables a bunch of Cat5 cables rack rackmount kits (or shelves) and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my possession by accident, so be it ;-) That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface types required to practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). I'd love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? Think it's achievable with $4000? -e- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3921&t=3908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
So whats so special about the 3920? The only thing I see is Joken ring. I'm just starting my CCNP so IE is realistically a year out. Do you think with the rate companies are ditching joken ring gear it will still be on the test by then. Crapple talk has gone pretty much gone away. Eugene ""Darren Crawford"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've said it before and I'll say it again. Get yourself a 3920. You will > see > in the lab. > > Darren > > At 07:24 PM 05/09/2001 -0400, Eugene Nine wrote: > >Here's what I have so far: > >2524 w/ 1 4 in one module > >2516 > >2507 > >2 DTE cables and 1 DCE cable > >all above for $1843 (bought it all in one purchase because I had $1900 to > >spend) > >One 10U desktop rack $55 > > > >Next I'm thinking one of the access servers to setup the reverse telnet > >deal. > >Eugene > > > > > >""Fred Danson"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> I have a similar setup, here's what mine cost me (without shipping)- > >> > >> 2501- $550 > >> 2502- $404 > >> 2503- $630 > >> 2504- $540 > >> 2511- $900 > >> 2523- $900 > >> Cat1800 Token Switch- $300 > >> 4000 w/2 ethernet, 1 token, 2 serial, 4 BRI- $1000 > >> ISDN Simulator- $1800 > >> > >> Total- $7024 (without shipping) > >> > >> I bought all of my equipment from ebay. Where are you planning on buying > >> yours from? Also, why would you need 4 hubs when you have a switch? You > >> could easily make the switch act like a number of hubs by creating VLANS. > >> > >> If you have any questions, feel free to email me. > >> > >> Fred > >> > >> >From: "EA Louie" > >> >Reply-To: "EA Louie" > >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > >> >Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:09:22 -0400 > >> > > >> >I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build a > >> >CCIE > >> >lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local > >> >studygroup. > >> >Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me > >know. > >> > > >> >Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: > >> > > >> >1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) > >> >1-2503 --- ISDN > >> >1-2504 --- ISDN > >> >1-2514 - dual eth > >> >1-2515 - dual t/r > >> >1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they > >exist > >> >(F/R switch) > >> >1-2924-XL > >> >teltone isdn simulator > >> >3 token ring MAUs > >> >3 token ring media filters > >> >4 AUI-10BT transceivers > >> >4 Ethernet hubs > >> >6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables > >> >a bunch of Cat5 cables > >> >rack > >> >rackmount kits (or shelves) > >> >and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > >> > > >> >I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my > >> >possession > >> >by accident, > >> >so be it ;-) > >> > > >> >That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface > >types > >> >required to > >> >practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). > >I'd > >> >love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > >> > > >> >What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? Think > >> >it's > >> >achievable with $4000? > >> > > >> >-e- > >> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> _ > >> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > *** > Darren S. Crawford > Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services > 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 > Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 > Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.lucent.com Network Systems > Consultant - CCNA, CCIE Written > > "Providing the Power Operable Networks." > > > *** > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3920&t=3908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Channelize E1 balance or unbalance [7:3919]
Hi Groupdstudy, I have a number of sites running ISDN PRI E1. But some of our Channelize E1 card is balance and some of them is unbalance. Can someone highlight to me what is the differece between them? Most of our ISDN switch type is primiary-net5. Can I use balance/unbalance on this switch?.. Thanx a million _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3919&t=3919 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Printing Boson Exams and a ringing endorsement [7:3447]
I think that's how it normally works. I've written some test for them and one of the things I really like about Boson products is that my question database can evolve over time. When people write me about something they didn't understand or that isn't clear, I can change it and the update is available free to anybody who does the update. When I learn something new, I can incorporate that in the database as well. I don't know about the other authors, but I make changes every week or so. --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Printing Boson Exams and a ringing endorsement [7:3447] just for your info I was able to upgrade online and get the new serial numbers without having to email Boson. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "John Andrews" To: Sent: Wednesday, 09 May, 2001 00:34 Subject: RE: Printing Boson Exams and a ringing endorsement [7:3447] > Wow...I bought the test alsoI am glad to know I can update. Thanks. > > Thanks. > John A > > > >= Original Message From "Donald B Johnson jr" > = > >What are you talking about. All those stupid idiot letters under your name > >and you still can't read. I'll spell it out. I bought those test You are > >permitted to update!! > >He checked their database and I was in there!! He sent the > >codes!! > >You better hope your boss/client aint on this site now they will know what > >we all suspected. > > > >Couple other points: > >he ain't my friend - just had business dealings, > >and we ain't mates. - skip. > >Don > > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Michael E Taiwo" > >To: "Donald B Johnson jr" > >Cc: ; > >Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 9:00 AM > >Subject: Re: Printing Boson Exams and a ringing endorsement [7:3447] > > > > > >> Sorry, I don't mean to be involve in these, but don't you think that > >you've > >> actually put the guy that gave you, the crack in danger, by exposing his > >> Email address in Groupstudy. > >> > >> Reason been is, that the guys that set the boson questions are in this > >> groupstudy, and believe me your friends job is on the line mate. > >> > >> Mike. > >> > >> CCNP,CCDP,CCNA,CCDA,MCSE+I > >> - Original Message - > >> From: "Donald B Johnson jr" > >> To: > >> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 3:33 PM > >> Subject: Re: Printing Boson Exams and a ringing endorsement [7:3447] > >> > >> > >> > Thanks Kevin > >> > Worked like a charm, the pdf thing. > >> > Did you know that you can update your boson tests to version 3.67. > >> > It adds a cool feature that lets you test by category plus it updates > >your > >> > questions, "example I just created a pdf with all bgp questions" from > >the > >> > bscn test I bought. > >> > Just email this guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your serial numbers > >and > >> he > >> > will send you back new unlock codes. > >> > You also have to go to their site and down load the new testing engine. > >> > Oh by the way, Chad is working on his last test for CCNP then he is > >going > >> > for CCIE so he understands what we are about, not just a sales man with > >no > >> > clue. He was also one of the most helpful people I ever dealt with. I > >> > e-mailed my serial numbers, 10 in all and he sent me back my new 3.67 > >> > unlocks in fifteen minutes. One of the numbers I sent was wrong so I > >> resent > >> > the correct number and a new unlock was sent in about five minutes. > >GREAT > >> > SERVICE BOSON, thanks Chad!!! > >> > Lets review > >> > 10 test @ 30 dollars = CCNA/CCDA/CCNP/CCDP + two CCIE tests locked in > >the > >> > chamber for the written in a month for Don + great testing content + > >good > >> > money for the test writers + great service from Chad. What a value. > >> > No I don't work for Boson but so what if I did, I ain't lying. > >> > > >> > > >> > Don > >> > > >> > > >> > - Original Message - > >> > From: "Kevin Wigle" > >> > To: > >> > Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 1:06 PM > >> > Subject: Printing Boson Exams [7:3327] > >> > > >> > > >> > > Dear Group, > >> > > > >> > > Lost the original post but here's an answer of sorts. > >> > > > >> > > At the top in the File menu tree you can print each question. > >> > > > >> > > The print operation doesn't ask you where to print, it just uses the > >> > default > >> > > printer. > >> > > > >> > > So, create a new "printer" that prints to file (local printer - > >Generic) > >> > and > >> > > make it the default while you're doing the questions. > >> > > > >> > > Not very elegant actually as each question will overwrite the last one > >> > > saved. So keep windows explorer open and rename the output each time. > >> > > > >> > > Unfortunately, graphics won't come across too well. > >> > > > >> > > So if you own the Adobe Editor - it installs the Adobe Distiller which > >> is > >> > > another print to file operation but you get to keep all the graphics > >and > >> > its > >>
Re: Encapsulation V-LAN [7:3798]
You did not mention it, but I assume you have sub interfaces with ISL encapsulation on the routers , the same as the VLAN os the switches.. What happens when you do a "sh stan" from each router ? andyh wrote: > if you have a Cisco-only switch architecture I would use ISL between the > Catalysts - per-vlan STP is *VERY* useful for resilience and load-balancing > purposes. > > I would use dot1q for attached servers where necessary - since they are > end-stations there is not the requirement for them to participate int STP. > > my #0.02 (is 0.02 UK pounds worth more than $0.02?) > > Andy > > > > > > >Hi Guys, > > >i have a question for you. > > > > > >In my site i have to project a new network architecture. > > > > > >I would organize the Resource human in V-LAN. Of course all V-LAN have to > > >access some services (example DNS, E-Mail, Domain Controller etc. etc) > and > > >not others. > > > > > >The NIC interfaces of my servers permit the 802.1Q encapsulation. > > > > Ensure that the host does not route between the VLANs, as this kills your > > security policy. > > > > >I would make the TRUNK between switches (Catalyst 4000 - access Layer and > > >Catalyst 6500 -Core Layer) with ISL trunk. > > > > Why not just use dot1q? > > > > >Can i map the 802.1Q trunk on ISL trunk? And how could i do this ? > > > > No, they are similar products, but IIRC some switches support both > products, > > so you could use ISL on one trunk, and dot1q on another. > > > > >Please indicate me link where i can find a example of this configuration > ? > > > > I would recommend dot1q everywhere. > > > > >Regards, Carmelo > > > > Rob./ > > > > _ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3918&t=3798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Changing ISPs [7:3831]
This is probably your best resource: http://www.netaxs.com/~freedman/bgp/bgp.html - Original Message - From: "andyh" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 5:47 PM Subject: Re: Changing ISPs [7:3831] > depends if you use PI or PA space: > > PI - Provider Independant space, this if effectively "owned" by your AS - > believe it used to be called "mobile", although there are still restraints > regarding global routability if you wish to move it between continents - > some Tier-1 ISP will filter on intercontinental links based on the > route-registry origin (ARIN, RIPE, APNIC, etc. > > PA - Provider Allocated (or Assigned I can never remember which way around > the route-registries label these things). This is allocated/assigned to you > from your provider, from one of their own aggregate block, and you cannot > "take it with you" if you leave that ISP. > > Generally PI space is preferred, there should be no problem routing this > through any provider, and you can move with impunity (subject to > restrictions on moves of an inter-continental nature, as per above). All > you need to ensure this that your routing policy, and that of your upstream, > with the appropriate registry is correct. > > PA space is more tricky, and is at the discretion of your "secondary" > provider(s). Some do, some don't - try your luck ;-) It is "legal" to > route a more-specific prefix of a provider's aggregate block - I had a chat > to RIPE about this a while back, and although not documented, they are keen > to lessen the amount of PI space they give out. The difference here is that > although you are advertising a route that is included in your provider's > aggregate prefix, you are advertising a different prefix, and as BGP works > on a per-prefix basis it doesn't discriminate between the overlapping > routes. > > hope that makes sense > > Andy > > - Original Message - > From: "Brett Johnson" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 4:37 PM > Subject: Changing ISPs [7:3831] > > > > If I acquire an AS number and use it with two providers what happens if in > a > > year or two > > I decided to change one of the providers. Do I have to inform ARIN or > > acquire a new AS > > number? What would be the process of informing the Internet (through BGP) > > when changing > > the ISP? How about if I added a third ISP instead of changing ISPs? > > > > Thank you > > > > Brett Johnson > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3917&t=3831 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Central Hub Site with six T1's. [7:3841]
Hi OK I am a little confused here, you say "Frame relay is not an option because all of the sites are within about __15 miles__ of the central site I have chosen as their hub, and their bandwidth needs are such that a T1 is feasible." So does this mean that you think FR is not an option because all of the sites are a short distance away from the hub site? If this is your answer... FR can be done between floors of a building, just because they close doesn't mean that you can not use it. In fact in it is cheaper than doing to another state for example. If your customer is truly short on cash to do this, then putting in 6 point to point T1's is going to be WAY more expensive than FR. In most markets a p to p T1 is more per month than the equivalent FR line, not to mention the cost of a router to handle 6 T1's is going to be quite a bit more than one that can handle 6 PVCs. HTH -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE ""SJ"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > > I hope everyone is doing well today. Since this is my first time > writing to the Cisco groupstudy I would like to say that I am glad to be a > member. As each of you I to hope to someday reach CCIE status. However, as > all of us I have to support myself and my family so work is always number > one priority. With that being said I have a work related question. I have > a customer who has 6 remote sites and a central site. Each remote site will > be tied into the hub (central site) via T1's. Frame relay is not an option > because all of the sites are within about 15 miles of the central site I > have chosen as their hub, and their bandwidth needs are such that a T1 is > feasible. So, now to my question. Which cisco router supports 6 or more T1 > connections. This customer is on a limited budget, as such I will be > deploying cisco 1750's at each remote site, however I want to tie all of the > remote sites into the central site, so I need a router with enough > interfaces to support 6 or more T1's. My goal is that each remote site will > have default routes to the central site, and at the central site I will > create static routes to the remote sites, as there is no need to run a > routing protocol in this configuration. Can anyone give me a good central > site router (cheap) that supports six or more T1 interfaces. > > > > > Thanks, > > > SJ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3916&t=3841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage [7:3915]
Hi! You've got to see this page! It's really cool ;O) [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of homepage.HTML.vbs] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3915&t=3915 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Get yourself a 3920. You will see in the lab. Darren At 07:24 PM 05/09/2001 -0400, Eugene Nine wrote: >Here's what I have so far: >2524 w/ 1 4 in one module >2516 >2507 >2 DTE cables and 1 DCE cable >all above for $1843 (bought it all in one purchase because I had $1900 to >spend) >One 10U desktop rack $55 > >Next I'm thinking one of the access servers to setup the reverse telnet >deal. >Eugene > > >""Fred Danson"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> I have a similar setup, here's what mine cost me (without shipping)- >> >> 2501- $550 >> 2502- $404 >> 2503- $630 >> 2504- $540 >> 2511- $900 >> 2523- $900 >> Cat1800 Token Switch- $300 >> 4000 w/2 ethernet, 1 token, 2 serial, 4 BRI- $1000 >> ISDN Simulator- $1800 >> >> Total- $7024 (without shipping) >> >> I bought all of my equipment from ebay. Where are you planning on buying >> yours from? Also, why would you need 4 hubs when you have a switch? You >> could easily make the switch act like a number of hubs by creating VLANS. >> >> If you have any questions, feel free to email me. >> >> Fred >> >> >From: "EA Louie" >> >Reply-To: "EA Louie" >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] >> >Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:09:22 -0400 >> > >> >I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build a >> >CCIE >> >lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local >> >studygroup. >> >Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me >know. >> > >> >Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: >> > >> >1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) >> >1-2503 --- ISDN >> >1-2504 --- ISDN >> >1-2514 - dual eth >> >1-2515 - dual t/r >> >1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they >exist >> >(F/R switch) >> >1-2924-XL >> >teltone isdn simulator >> >3 token ring MAUs >> >3 token ring media filters >> >4 AUI-10BT transceivers >> >4 Ethernet hubs >> >6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables >> >a bunch of Cat5 cables >> >rack >> >rackmount kits (or shelves) >> >and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) >> > >> >I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my >> >possession >> >by accident, >> >so be it ;-) >> > >> >That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface >types >> >required to >> >practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). >I'd >> >love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. >> > >> >What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? Think >> >it's >> >achievable with $4000? >> > >> >-e- >> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> _ >> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Darren S. Crawford Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucent.com Network Systems Consultant - CCNA, CCIE Written "Providing the Power Operable Networks." *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3914&t=3908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Central Hub Site with six T1's. [7:3841]
Others have commented on the hardware options for 6 * T1s, if that's what you want. I don't know what is available wherever you are, and at what cost, but here it is possible to get frame relay at up to 44 Mbps access speed (2 Mbps increments above 2 Mbps). Runs on a HSSI interface. If that's available to you, it may be more cost-effective than multiple T1s. Also, if all your sites are within 15 miles, you could run 1000BaseZX over fibre. This is very unlikely to be cost-effective, but hey, if you happen to have access to cheap fibre, it means you won't run out of bandwidth in a hurry :-) JMcL -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 10/05/2001 08:51 am --- "Brian" @groupstudy.com on 10/05/2001 05:31:04 am Please respond to "Brian" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Central Hub Site with six T1's. [7:3841] I also would consider frame relay as a choice, you can get it up to full t1 speed, the cost is often lower than t1, and telco monitors them more closely. If you are committed to separate t1s, and the possibility of bringing in an isp link and bgp peering pops up, you'll want a beefy 3600 or 7204vxr. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Wed, 9 May 2001, SJ wrote: > Hello, > > I hope everyone is doing well today. Since this is my first time > writing to the Cisco groupstudy I would like to say that I am glad to be a > member. As each of you I to hope to someday reach CCIE status. However, as > all of us I have to support myself and my family so work is always number > one priority. With that being said I have a work related question. I have > a customer who has 6 remote sites and a central site. Each remote site will > be tied into the hub (central site) via T1's. Frame relay is not an option > because all of the sites are within about 15 miles of the central site I > have chosen as their hub, and their bandwidth needs are such that a T1 is > feasible. So, now to my question. Which cisco router supports 6 or more T1 > connections. This customer is on a limited budget, as such I will be > deploying cisco 1750's at each remote site, however I want to tie all of the > remote sites into the central site, so I need a router with enough > interfaces to support 6 or more T1's. My goal is that each remote site will > have default routes to the central site, and at the central site I will > create static routes to the remote sites, as there is no need to run a > routing protocol in this configuration. Can anyone give me a good central > site router (cheap) that supports six or more T1 interfaces. > > > > > Thanks, > > > SJ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3913&t=3841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
Here's what I have so far: 2524 w/ 1 4 in one module 2516 2507 2 DTE cables and 1 DCE cable all above for $1843 (bought it all in one purchase because I had $1900 to spend) One 10U desktop rack $55 Next I'm thinking one of the access servers to setup the reverse telnet deal. Eugene ""Fred Danson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a similar setup, here's what mine cost me (without shipping)- > > 2501- $550 > 2502- $404 > 2503- $630 > 2504- $540 > 2511- $900 > 2523- $900 > Cat1800 Token Switch- $300 > 4000 w/2 ethernet, 1 token, 2 serial, 4 BRI- $1000 > ISDN Simulator- $1800 > > Total- $7024 (without shipping) > > I bought all of my equipment from ebay. Where are you planning on buying > yours from? Also, why would you need 4 hubs when you have a switch? You > could easily make the switch act like a number of hubs by creating VLANS. > > If you have any questions, feel free to email me. > > Fred > > >From: "EA Louie" > >Reply-To: "EA Louie" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] > >Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:09:22 -0400 > > > >I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build a > >CCIE > >lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local > >studygroup. > >Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me know. > > > >Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: > > > >1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) > >1-2503 --- ISDN > >1-2504 --- ISDN > >1-2514 - dual eth > >1-2515 - dual t/r > >1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they exist > >(F/R switch) > >1-2924-XL > >teltone isdn simulator > >3 token ring MAUs > >3 token ring media filters > >4 AUI-10BT transceivers > >4 Ethernet hubs > >6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables > >a bunch of Cat5 cables > >rack > >rackmount kits (or shelves) > >and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > > > >I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my > >possession > >by accident, > >so be it ;-) > > > >That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface types > >required to > >practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). I'd > >love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > > > >What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? Think > >it's > >achievable with $4000? > > > >-e- > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3912&t=3908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
Budget more. The teltone will run you around $1500 methinks. You might want to try a 500-CS (or is it CS-500?) series access server instead of a 2511. A 2522(or 2523) would be nice to set up as a frame relay switch and try a 2901 instead of the 2924-XL as a switch. On the equipment list is also a 3900 series token ring switch which used to be an olicom 8600, that might be real nice to have. Judging by the prices on ebay (which from what I have found are usually market for used cisco stuff) you probably need to budget $7,000 to $8,000 and another $1,500 to $1,800 for the 3900 (unless you get lucky and find an actual olicom 8600 which might go cheaper as it doesn't say cisco on it). Also you are missing voice capabilities which I have heard shows up on one of the labs. ATM is missing as well (in my lab we solved that with a 3COM frame relay/ATM access concentrator, though I don't remember specifics off the top of my head right now). I've been going with 2502s instead of 2501s due to price and the fact that im pretty familiar with ethernet at this point. For the console server you might also want to consider a Xylan 1800 (or 1600 with software) or a Digi Portserver. Both would be much cheaper than a 500-CS (or is it CS-500, you make the call:) though the cabling wants to make me puke (im still trying to find a cat5 cable with 10 wires instead of 8, maybe im just not looking in the right places. You might be able to save some money with a POTS simulator and async ports for a while and still do most of the dialer configs instead of all the ISDN stuff as ISDN routers and simulator. Take a look at ccbootcamp's lab(s) and model off their equipment. My lab is as follows (2) 2502 (1) 1750, serial, voice, BRI (2) 1720, 1 serial each (1) AccessPro somethingorothernotallthatuseful (1) HUB (3) Linux boxes for tftp, ntp, snmp, and traffic (1) Frame relay/ATM thingybobber (1) Xylan 1800 maybe will be swapped with Digi Portserver 8 What will be added later this summer (1) 5000, Sup1, 24 ports (1) 3920 (1) Async ports on 1720s (1) 1750, serial, voice, BRI (1) 2523 (for a frame switch) (1) POTS simulator (1) lots of modems and csu/dsu just because HTH Ben --- EA Louie wrote: > I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to > git ready") to build a > CCIE > lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the > use of my local studygroup. > Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing > anything, please let me know. > > Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the > equipment: > > 1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) > 1-2503 --- ISDN > 1-2504 --- ISDN > 1-2514 - dual eth > 1-2515 - dual t/r > 1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI > interface or two if they exist > (F/R switch) > 1-2924-XL > teltone isdn simulator > 3 token ring MAUs > 3 token ring media filters > 4 AUI-10BT transceivers > 4 Ethernet hubs > 6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables > a bunch of Cat5 cables > rack > rackmount kits (or shelves) > and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > > I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 > falls into my possession > by accident, > so be it ;-) > > That should provide most of what's needed and enough > of the interface types > required to > practice configurations (especially desktop > protocols and iBGP/eBGP). I'd > love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > > What do you think about this parts list? Pretty > good for a start? Think > it's > achievable with $4000? > > -e- > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3911&t=3908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
I have a similar setup, here's what mine cost me (without shipping)- 2501- $550 2502- $404 2503- $630 2504- $540 2511- $900 2523- $900 Cat1800 Token Switch- $300 4000 w/2 ethernet, 1 token, 2 serial, 4 BRI- $1000 ISDN Simulator- $1800 Total- $7024 (without shipping) I bought all of my equipment from ebay. Where are you planning on buying yours from? Also, why would you need 4 hubs when you have a switch? You could easily make the switch act like a number of hubs by creating VLANS. If you have any questions, feel free to email me. Fred >From: "EA Louie" >Reply-To: "EA Louie" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908] >Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:09:22 -0400 > >I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build a >CCIE >lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local >studygroup. >Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me know. > >Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: > >1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) >1-2503 --- ISDN >1-2504 --- ISDN >1-2514 - dual eth >1-2515 - dual t/r >1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they exist >(F/R switch) >1-2924-XL >teltone isdn simulator >3 token ring MAUs >3 token ring media filters >4 AUI-10BT transceivers >4 Ethernet hubs >6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables >a bunch of Cat5 cables >rack >rackmount kits (or shelves) >and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > >I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my >possession >by accident, >so be it ;-) > >That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface types >required to >practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). I'd >love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > >What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? Think >it's >achievable with $4000? > >-e- >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3910&t=3908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
I originally built my lab with several 25xx units, and a 4500 as a central switch. I started out with them stacked on a cheap shelving unit, and when I found a small rack for free, moved them into it. You can do a lot of playing with three or four 25xx routers and a few cables. Add the 4000 with some serial interfaces, and you can pretty much play with all the LAN/WAN configs you'll need to see, except ATM and ISDN. Note that memory limitations will keep you from running IOS versions that provide IPX/AT/DEC interfaces. You can add 16mb DRAM fairly cheaply, and by compressing the IOS, you can get an enterprise or desktop image to boot from a small flash. The 2509/2511 is pretty handy, if not crucial to getting quick at configuring multiple routers. I'd suggest getting several 2513/2514 routers, as that allows you to play with both TR and ethernet. I don't know that having TR or Eth on the 4000 is necessary, but if it happens to come in the 4000, so be it. The 2501/2502 boxes only give you one LAN interface, so they aren't as useful as the 2513/2514, so unless it's a great deal, buy the boxes with the most interfaces. :) Add some TR MAUs (IBM 8228s are pretty cheap) and cables, some cheap eth hubs or crossover cables & transceivers, and you've got LAN segments. Add some cheap TR & eth NICs to a cheap Linux or windoze box, and you can use freeware sniffers to actually see the packets on the LAN. Get more DCE/DTE wan crossover cables than you have routers, so you can play with load balancing, and more complex networks. There's lots of TR gear getting ripped out of businesses right now, and most of it ends up in the dumpster. Make friends with a local networking company, you might get all the NICs, MAUs, and cables that you can haul away. I would choose not to buy ISDN hardware, simply because the ISDN simulator eats half your budget -- you can rent the rack time you need to cover ISDN (and ATM), as needed. With rolled console cables connected to AUX ports, you can practice DDR and backup interfaces, but you'll need to actually configure ISDN a few times, and debug it, to see the gory details of ISDN. For the price of the ISDN switch, you could get another three 25xx routers, which allows you to run more complex scenarios. Just my opinion, of course. Likewise, the Catalyst 2901/5000 can be a bit pricey, for the limited things you'll be able to do with it. If you wanted to do VLAN/ISL/dot1q configs, you'll need a fast ethernet interface on a router, which the 25xx boxes don't do. The 2924xl switch is nice to play with, but it won't give you anything specific to configure, without more expensive hardware to connect it to (4500 or 26xx with FastEth). You can rent access to a Catalyst equipped rack, or get access to one of Neil's Kitty labs, or just buy the Cisco Mentor for Lan Switching which contains a switch lab simulator, as well as tutorials for learning switching (I think it's still the old CLSC course materials). If you're thinking about VoIP, that's another chunk of change to part with. Again, you can rent rack time or use the CIM VoIP to get the skills and practice. I bought an 827-4v to use as my DSL modem, and it came with four FXS/FXO ports to play with. Without a PBX in your lab, that's about all you'd be able to configure, anyway, even if you had a bigger VoIP router to play with. Take all this with the requisite NaCl grain -- everyone's lab is different. Mine's mutated several times, as I found good deals on gear, got interested in playing with specific things, and got bored with some of the gear. When I took a job with a company with a huge (=fubar) network, less stuff became critical to have in the lab. When you spend the day troubleshooting SNA/SRB, ATM, and Token Ring, you don't really need it at home. :P -jon- --- EA Louie wrote: > I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build > a CCIE > lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local > studygroup. > Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me > know. > > Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: > > 1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) > 1-2503 --- ISDN > 1-2504 --- ISDN > 1-2514 - dual eth > 1-2515 - dual t/r > 1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they > exist > (F/R switch) > 1-2924-XL > teltone isdn simulator > 3 token ring MAUs > 3 token ring media filters > 4 AUI-10BT transceivers > 4 Ethernet hubs > 6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables > a bunch of Cat5 cables > rack > rackmount kits (or shelves) > and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) > > I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my > possession by accident, so be it ;-) > > That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface > types required to > practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). > I'd love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. > > What do you think about this pa
CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]
I'm getting ready (or in Texas, I'd be "a-fixin to git ready") to build a CCIE lab prep setup, both for personal use and for the use of my local studygroup. Here's what I've identified - if I'm missing anything, please let me know. Here's the strategy I'm going to take for the equipment: 1-2511 --- console server (w/ octal cable) 1-2503 --- ISDN 1-2504 --- ISDN 1-2514 - dual eth 1-2515 - dual t/r 1-4000 w/NP-4T and NP-1E or NP-2E, and a BRI interface or two if they exist (F/R switch) 1-2924-XL teltone isdn simulator 3 token ring MAUs 3 token ring media filters 4 AUI-10BT transceivers 4 Ethernet hubs 6 60-pin DTE-DCE cables a bunch of Cat5 cables rack rackmount kits (or shelves) and a partridge in a pear tree ;-) I'm budgeting about $4000 and if an additional 2501 falls into my possession by accident, so be it ;-) That should provide most of what's needed and enough of the interface types required to practice configurations (especially desktop protocols and iBGP/eBGP). I'd love a Cat5k too, but I can't do it on this budget. What do you think about this parts list? Pretty good for a start? Think it's achievable with $4000? -e- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3908&t=3908 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNA, CCNP, Stuff [7:3356]
please send more information D'Wayne Saunders Senior MIS Operator, CCNA -Original Message- From: Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 9 May 2001 22:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNA, CCNP, Stuff [7:3356] like to know more abt it as well as price Muhammad Tariq wrote: > IF you guyz are intrested to buy Cisco Training+ Testing stuff contact me > Cisco Testing have been tested with 100% success its better than any boson > or ccprep or transcnder thing > it gives 100% success and created after very hardworking with all summaires > > u can sale them or use in ur training area or for urself but can not forward > .. > > for detail and price > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3906&t=3356 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP between offices [7:3769]
Here is a bunch of sites that one of the Cisco VOIP techs gave me. Enjoy Click here: Information on Voice using a Cisco router http://www.geocities.com/trexken_2000/voip.html Ken's Web Page(http://www.geocities.com/trexken_2000) "There is more to life than increasing its speed." - Mahatma Gandhi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3907&t=3769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402]
Hey Jason Thanks for your help...Now all I have to do is get rid of the 1E2W card.. And i should be in business for my frame switch... Well actually right now I can still use one of the wic cards & place it in the fixed slot... the other fixed slot is occupied by a smart serial dual port card...so i still have 3 serial ports for the frame stuff... I'd rather have @ least 4 though... Again thanks for all your help guy's !!! Randy. On Wed, 9 May 2001 12:28:45 +1000 "Jason Baker" writes: > If you want to use your 2600 as frame relay switch do as i have done > buy a > NM-4a/s, 4t, 8a/s or 8/t. > > A 1fe2w only works in 3600. > > Regards, > > Jason Baker > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:44 AM > Subject: Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > > > > o.k. so basically to get this puppy to work in the 2600 series i > need to > > get > > a 1FE2W encasing module to hold the wic 2t's ?? I'm going to try > to use > > this box as a > > frame switch so i'm trying to get as many serial interfaces on it > as > > possible... > > > > Thanks for your help guy's!! > > > > Randy > > > > > > On Mon, 7 May 2001 13:53:25 +1000 "Jason Baker" > > > writes: > > > also another tip. The WIC 2-T modules do not work in plain > ethernet > > > based > > > modules (such as 1e2w). > > > You need to get a 1FE2W at least to put the WIC 2t-s in. > > > > > > However the wic 2-t's will work in the fixed serial slots in > the > > > 2600's. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Jason Baker > > > --- > > > Network Engineer > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:17 PM > > > Subject: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > > > > > > > > > > Hi all !! > > > > > > > > I have just finished installinga new 1 e 2 w module in my > 2610 > > > router & > > > > It's not being recognized, unit allready had an existing Wic > 2t > > > plus the > > > > built in ethernet > > > > port. I added the 2t 1e which is actually 2 wic 1 t cards with > an > > > > ethernet port on the main module > > > > and it's not being recognized, When i remove the existin wic 2 > t > > > cards > > > > only the main ethernet shows up on the show > > > > version..I do see the Act led on the module solid green but > > > nothing on > > > > the sho ver.. > > > > > > > > Am i mssing something ... do I have to activate this new > module > > > somehow > > > > ?? > > > > > > > > Clueless @ this point... > > > > > > > > TIA for any info you might provide. > > > > > > > > Randy > > > > > > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > > > > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > > > > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > > > > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3905&t=3402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402]
I'll check & see if i can find one of these on e-bay somewhere... Hey thanks for your help Jason ! On Wed, 9 May 2001 12:28:45 +1000 "Jason Baker" writes: > If you want to use your 2600 as frame relay switch do as i have done > buy a > NM-4a/s, 4t, 8a/s or 8/t. > > A 1fe2w only works in 3600. > > Regards, > > Jason Baker > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:44 AM > Subject: Re: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > > > > o.k. so basically to get this puppy to work in the 2600 series i > need to > > get > > a 1FE2W encasing module to hold the wic 2t's ?? I'm going to try > to use > > this box as a > > frame switch so i'm trying to get as many serial interfaces on it > as > > possible... > > > > Thanks for your help guy's!! > > > > Randy > > > > > > On Mon, 7 May 2001 13:53:25 +1000 "Jason Baker" > > > writes: > > > also another tip. The WIC 2-T modules do not work in plain > ethernet > > > based > > > modules (such as 1e2w). > > > You need to get a 1FE2W at least to put the WIC 2t-s in. > > > > > > However the wic 2-t's will work in the fixed serial slots in > the > > > 2600's. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Jason Baker > > > --- > > > Network Engineer > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:17 PM > > > Subject: 2610 w/ an additional 1e 2w module [7:3402] > > > > > > > > > > Hi all !! > > > > > > > > I have just finished installinga new 1 e 2 w module in my > 2610 > > > router & > > > > It's not being recognized, unit allready had an existing Wic > 2t > > > plus the > > > > built in ethernet > > > > port. I added the 2t 1e which is actually 2 wic 1 t cards with > an > > > > ethernet port on the main module > > > > and it's not being recognized, When i remove the existin wic 2 > t > > > cards > > > > only the main ethernet shows up on the show > > > > version..I do see the Act led on the module solid green but > > > nothing on > > > > the sho ver.. > > > > > > > > Am i mssing something ... do I have to activate this new > module > > > somehow > > > > ?? > > > > > > > > Clueless @ this point... > > > > > > > > TIA for any info you might provide. > > > > > > > > Randy > > > > > > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > > > > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > > > > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > > > > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. > > > > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3904&t=3402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP - Load Balancing [7:3903]
My first BGP project and I am lost! I am looking for a brief overview of how load balancing is configured using BGP Multi-homed connections. I thought a company with 2 ISP connections would use one link and have the other available as backup only. But from what I understand from the client request, they are expecting to load balance in some way over both links. I don't need the specific configs, just the rough guidelines/pitfalls, so that I can work out where to begin my research. Any takers? Rashid Lohiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] 020 8509 2990 07785 362626 www.pioneer-computers.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3903&t=3903 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Changing ISPs [7:3831]
depends if you use PI or PA space: PI - Provider Independant space, this if effectively "owned" by your AS - believe it used to be called "mobile", although there are still restraints regarding global routability if you wish to move it between continents - some Tier-1 ISP will filter on intercontinental links based on the route-registry origin (ARIN, RIPE, APNIC, etc. PA - Provider Allocated (or Assigned I can never remember which way around the route-registries label these things). This is allocated/assigned to you from your provider, from one of their own aggregate block, and you cannot "take it with you" if you leave that ISP. Generally PI space is preferred, there should be no problem routing this through any provider, and you can move with impunity (subject to restrictions on moves of an inter-continental nature, as per above). All you need to ensure this that your routing policy, and that of your upstream, with the appropriate registry is correct. PA space is more tricky, and is at the discretion of your "secondary" provider(s). Some do, some don't - try your luck ;-) It is "legal" to route a more-specific prefix of a provider's aggregate block - I had a chat to RIPE about this a while back, and although not documented, they are keen to lessen the amount of PI space they give out. The difference here is that although you are advertising a route that is included in your provider's aggregate prefix, you are advertising a different prefix, and as BGP works on a per-prefix basis it doesn't discriminate between the overlapping routes. hope that makes sense Andy - Original Message - From: "Brett Johnson" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 4:37 PM Subject: Changing ISPs [7:3831] > If I acquire an AS number and use it with two providers what happens if in a > year or two > I decided to change one of the providers. Do I have to inform ARIN or > acquire a new AS > number? What would be the process of informing the Internet (through BGP) > when changing > the ISP? How about if I added a third ISP instead of changing ISPs? > > Thank you > > Brett Johnson > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3902&t=3831 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Encapsulation V-LAN [7:3798]
if you have a Cisco-only switch architecture I would use ISL between the Catalysts - per-vlan STP is *VERY* useful for resilience and load-balancing purposes. I would use dot1q for attached servers where necessary - since they are end-stations there is not the requirement for them to participate int STP. my #0.02 (is 0.02 UK pounds worth more than $0.02?) Andy > > > >Hi Guys, > >i have a question for you. > > > >In my site i have to project a new network architecture. > > > >I would organize the Resource human in V-LAN. Of course all V-LAN have to > >access some services (example DNS, E-Mail, Domain Controller etc. etc) and > >not others. > > > >The NIC interfaces of my servers permit the 802.1Q encapsulation. > > Ensure that the host does not route between the VLANs, as this kills your > security policy. > > >I would make the TRUNK between switches (Catalyst 4000 - access Layer and > >Catalyst 6500 -Core Layer) with ISL trunk. > > Why not just use dot1q? > > >Can i map the 802.1Q trunk on ISL trunk? And how could i do this ? > > No, they are similar products, but IIRC some switches support both products, > so you could use ISL on one trunk, and dot1q on another. > > >Please indicate me link where i can find a example of this configuration ? > > I would recommend dot1q everywhere. > > >Regards, Carmelo > > Rob./ > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3901&t=3798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HSRP running on subinterface of 2651 [7:3800]
I have set this up on 2/362X/5Xs without any trouble, using ISL rather than dot1q, although can't imagine it would make any difference. what do you not have connectivity to? try extended pings between the real and vitrual interfaces on the routers with the appropriate subinterface as the source address can you post router interface configs and a "show standby brief"? Also trunk config(s) and a "show vlan" and "sh vtp domain" from the switch(es)? hth Andy inline also... Bremen K H Lee wrote: > Hi folks, > > I encounter some problem and hope that you folks can give me some idea. > > I have 2 2651, say A and B, connecting to a group of switches. Trunking and > VTP are running on the switch group. Each 2651 is connecting to the switches > on same VLANs. > > Say there is VLAN 1 and VLAN 2. Both 2651 are running trunking and dot1q > encapsulation. > > Ok, FE0/0.1 of A and FE0/0.2 of B are on VLAN 1 > FE0/0.2 of A and FE0/0.2 of B are on VLAN 2 I assume that you mean FE0/0.1 of A & B are in VLAN1? > I setup HSRP on both subinterface and router A is always the highest HSRP > priority. > > I have a PC connecting or with IP address of VLAN 2 segment. I try to ping > from the PC to an interface of B but no response. But I can ping the > subinterface of B FE0/0.2. > > Is there any issue running HSRP on vLAN subinterface or do I miss any > configuration?? > > Thanks bros. > > > Cheers, > > Bremen > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3900&t=3800 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VOIP on CCIE Lab [7:3899]
Hi Guys, Can anyone suggest the minimum hardware requirements to practise the VOIP bits on the CCIE labs. I am thinking of buying the cards, but there is so much out there and I am truly confused. My friend has suggested I buy myself 2 x 1750's with DSP and FXS cards and I should be able to configure and test end-to-end voice connectivity. He said this was the cheapest option for me. I am just looking for a 2nd opinion. I have a 1000, 4 x 2500's and a 3620 router. Any other ideas, I am on a pretty tight budget. Rashid Lohiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] 020 8509 2990 07785 362626 www.pioneer-computers.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3899&t=3899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encapsulation V-LAN [7:3798]
Since ISL is Cisco's proprietary protocol it seems that support for new technologies are supported for ISL before 802.1Q on Cisco devices. For instance, Cisco's MPLS/Tag-Switching requires CEF on all MPLS enabled interfaces. CEF switching was supported for ISL since 12.0 however 802.1Q just recently became supported in 12.1T and unreliably at that. I agree with you that eventually ISL will go away but not in the immediate future. Cheers, -Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gareth Hinton Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 3:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Encapsulation V-LAN [7:3798] I would say use dot1q everywhere. ISL will disappear at some point in the future. Big overheads compared to dot1q. Anybody have any valid reasons to stay with ISL? Gaz ""carmelo Garofalo"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Guys, > i have a question for you. > > In my site i have to project a new network architecture. > > I would organize the Resource human in V-LAN. Of course all V-LAN have to > access some services (example DNS, E-Mail, Domain Controller etc. etc) and > not others. > > The NIC interfaces of my servers permit the 802.1Q encapsulation. > > I would make the TRUNK between switches (Catalyst 4000 - access Layer and > Catalyst 6500 -Core Layer) with ISL trunk. > > Can i map the 802.1Q trunk on ISL trunk? And how could i do this ? > > Please indicate me link where i can find a example of this configuration ? > > Regards, Carmelo > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3898&t=3798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco HSRP Denial of Service Vulnerability [7:3534]
Both the VPN3000 series and the CSS11000 series started their life as non-Cisco products (they were Altiga and Airopoint; I have both in my network still with the old face-plates even though I bought them from Cisco :-) I am not aware of any 'native' Cisco products that support VRRP. Johan Johan Reinalda Network Manager Thunderbird Grad. School ""Charles Manafa"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Cisco uses VRRP in its Content Services Switches - CSS11000 series > > CM > > > -Original Message- > > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 08 May 2001 19:32 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Cisco HSRP Denial of Service Vulnerability [7:3534] > > > > > > I searched the Cisco doc site and found VRRP mentioned only > > in relation to > > the VPN3000 product. Cisco has been talking about VRRP for years. I'm > > surprised it's not in more products??? > > > > Priscilla > > > > At 02:03 PM 5/8/01, Jacques Atlas wrote: > > >hi > > > > > >On Tue, 8 May 2001, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > > >|Also, instead of using HSRP you could use the Virtual > > Router Redundancy > > >|Protocol (VRRP) defined in RFC 2338. VRRP is the standards-track > > >|replacement for HSRP. The Security Considerations section explains > > >|authentication options, including using IPSec. > > > > > >can cisco's do vrrp ? > > > > > >-- > > >jacques > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3897&t=3534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help [7:3861]
Its fixed. Thanks >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: >Subject: Re: Help [7:3861] >Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 16:05:32 EDT > >Shane, >I found this link on the CCO. >It interprets the "not found on common subnets" error. >www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/15.html >HTH, >Rob H. >MCSE, CCNP, CCDP _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3896&t=3861 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem with 3620 [7:3895]
I have a 3620. It seems to power up okay, but I dont see anything on the screen and when I type I see nothing. I dont know if it is just not booting up or if there is a problem with the console port. I tried to boot into ROM monitor mode, but that was also unsuccessful. Bruce Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3895&t=3895 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HSRP running on subinterface of 2651 [7:3800]
Can you post the configs so we can have a gander? Gaz ""Bremen K H Lee"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Folks, > > Sorry I think I mistype something below. Let me rewrite it here again. > > I have 2 2651, say A and B, connecting to a group of switches. Trunking and > VTP are running on the switch group. Each 2651 is connecting to the > switches > on same VLANs. > > Say there is VLAN 1 and VLAN 2. Both 2651 are running trunking and dot1q > encapsulation. > > Ok, FE0/0.1 of A and FE0/0.1 of B are on VLAN 1 > FE0/0.2 of A and FE0/0.2 of B are on VLAN 2 > > I setup HSRP on both subinterface and router A is always the highest HSRP > priority. > > I have a PC connecting or with IP address of VLAN 2 segment. I try to ping > from the PC to an interface of B say FE0/0.1 but no response. But I can > ping the > subinterface of B FE0/0.2. I can also ping from A to B FE0/0.1. > > Is there any issue running HSRP on vLAN subinterface or do I miss any > configuration?? > > > Cheers, > > Bremen > > > ""Bremen K H Lee"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi folks, > > > > I encounter some problem and hope that you folks can give me some idea. > > > > I have 2 2651, say A and B, connecting to a group of switches. Trunking > and > > VTP are running on the switch group. Each 2651 is connecting to the > switches > > on same VLANs. > > > > Say there is VLAN 1 and VLAN 2. Both 2651 are running trunking and dot1q > > encapsulation. > > > > Ok, FE0/0.1 of A and FE0/0.2 of B are on VLAN 1 > > FE0/0.2 of A and FE0/0.2 of B are on VLAN 2 > > > > I setup HSRP on both subinterface and router A is always the highest HSRP > > priority. > > > > I have a PC connecting or with IP address of VLAN 2 segment. I try to > ping > > from the PC to an interface of B but no response. But I can ping the > > subinterface of B FE0/0.2. > > > > Is there any issue running HSRP on vLAN subinterface or do I miss any > > configuration?? > > > > Thanks bros. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bremen > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3894&t=3800 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Encapsulation V-LAN [7:3798]
I would say use dot1q everywhere. ISL will disappear at some point in the future. Big overheads compared to dot1q. Anybody have any valid reasons to stay with ISL? Gaz ""carmelo Garofalo"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Guys, > i have a question for you. > > In my site i have to project a new network architecture. > > I would organize the Resource human in V-LAN. Of course all V-LAN have to > access some services (example DNS, E-Mail, Domain Controller etc. etc) and > not others. > > The NIC interfaces of my servers permit the 802.1Q encapsulation. > > I would make the TRUNK between switches (Catalyst 4000 - access Layer and > Catalyst 6500 -Core Layer) with ISL trunk. > > Can i map the 802.1Q trunk on ISL trunk? And how could i do this ? > > Please indicate me link where i can find a example of this configuration ? > > Regards, Carmelo > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3893&t=3798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3620 with 2 x NM-2FE-2W problem [7:3687]
Thanks Kevin. I had another dig at work today and found a page that said they should work. Read through yours tonight (some of which, after another search today I still didn't find), and one of them contradicts. It went to TAC today. I'll have a look at the 'show pci hardware' in the morning. I'm in two minds as to whether this can be the problem (or possibly half a mind :-)). Whichever module is put in first works. I don't know whether this rules out a bus problem or not. I'll post Cisco's answer when it arrives. Thanks again, Gaz ""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ok, typically when trying to get a positive indication, either good or bad - > from Cisco about capabilities - is a very difficult thing. > > We have had good long threads on the list about things that work vs. things > that are supported. > > That being said, here is a snippet from: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/rt/3600/prodlit/atmnm_ov.htm > > Which describes an ATM module for the 3600 series. > > Technical Specifications > ATM OC-3 Network Module System Requirements > > Only supported on the Cisco 3600 series routers at this time > > Not supported on the Cisco 2600 series > > No slot placement restrictions on either platform > > * Maximum recommended on a single Cisco 3640 and Cisco 3620 is one > > * Max two high-speed network modules in a Cisco 3640 (includes Fast > Ethernet, ATM, HSSI) > > Requires Plus feature sets of Cisco IOS Release 12.0(3)T or above > > Operates in conjunction with all currently available Cisco 3600 network > modules and WAN interface cards (WICs) > > ** > > Note my stars. Although it says 2 modules I think this was before the 2FE2W > was around.. > > Now, below is a table from: > http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/pd/rt/3600/prodlit/1fefx_ov.htm > > Which is for the 1FEFX > > Supported Configurations > The following table provides configurations supported by the new modules. > > Table 2: Module Maximum Quantity in Cisco Max Number of NM-1FE-FX 3620 > 3640 > NM-1FE-FX 1 3 > > * > > bad pasting but it reads 1 FEFX for a 3620 and 3 for a 3640. > > Now having said all that, this page says that YES you can put 2 x NM-2FE2W > in a 3620: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/2600/prodlit/2636m_ds.htm > > The Maximum Number of NMs that can be utilized in each of the 2600/3600 > families is as follows: > > NM-2FE2W N/A >2600 3620 3640 3660 > N/A 2 46 > > Also: The minimum level of IOS is IOS 12.0(7)XK or 12.1(1)T > > And finally. > > You may want to look and see if you have a 3620 that has PCI bus problems. > > In this case (I actually had one and returned it), it was specifically ATM > but your output did mention PCI dev 5 > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/51.shtml > > give the command: show pci hardware > and if you see 0x22 or 0xE2 - then your 3620 should be returned. > > In any event, I think you have a case to take to TAC. > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Gareth Hinton" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, 08 May, 2001 19:56 > Subject: Re: 3620 with 2 x NM-2FE-2W problem [7:3687] > > > > That's exactly the sort of thing I'm looking for, but I've scoured CCO and > > cannot find anything that says it will or won't work. > > > > I've heard rumour that the only limiting factor was that I would not get a > > non-blocking configuration, but I'll put up with that if I can get it to > > work. > > > > Anybody any clues, particularly on the error that points to ROM version, > > while ROM version seems to be sufficient? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gaz > > > > ""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I would have to find it again but I'm sure that somewhere on CCO it says > > > that a 3620 shouldn't have more than 2 fast interfaces be they fast > > ethernet > > > or ATM or a combination. > > > > > > Your router now has 4 fast interfaces. > > > > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Gareth Hinton" > > > To: > > > Sent: Tuesday, 08 May, 2001 17:39 > > > Subject: 3620 with 2 x NM-2FE-2W problem [7:3687] > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Problem with a 3620: > > > > > > > > Takes one NM-2FE-2W fine. When second one is inserted major problems > > > arise. > > > > > > > > NM slot 0: PCI dev 5 init failed > > > > No fault history 0x. Need 11.1 (2) or higher ROM > > > > > > > > The boot rom is "System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(20)AA2" > > > > > > > > I've gone through CCO to confirm that the 3620 will take these cards, > > and > > > > although there were a few doubts, eventually found it and they should > be > > > OK. > > > > > > > > Anybody seen similar or got ideas. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Gaz > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message
CEF Question [7:3891]
What is the difference between doing the commands show adjacency and sho ip cef adjacency How does the information which is output differ? What are they telling you? omm Tom Pruneau Trainer Network Operations GENUITY 3 Van de Graff Drive Burlington Ma. 01803 24 Hr. Network Operations Center 800-436-8489 If you need to get a hold of me my hours are 8AM-4PM ET Mon-Fri --- This email is composed of 82% post consumer recycled data bits --- "Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3891&t=3891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA [7:2971]
Kevin-- My reply was intended to be with humor -- totally!!! If my words did not convey that == I really do apologize I'm no authority on any of this -- I was simply taking time out from my studying to "play" a bit. Again, no harm was intended. I'll try and be more careful with my words in the future. Greg Macaulay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Wigle Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCDA [7:2971] Gee, I don't what kind of backlog you have in reading this list but I thought it was agreed that yes it has changed. Another poster confirmed as much in her posting (I'll let you find it in the archives) with information from a different source. Actually that post is farther down this very same email that you forwarded to the list. And I think I can remember that Priscilla commented that that change was before her CCDA time, I could be wrong on that. So, why are you picking on me? I thought things were going along great with just the right amount of humour. Of course if you didn't recognize the humour I apologize. So I guess you're saying that she is wrong also (the other poster of course) .. well so be it if that makes you happy. At least I'm not alone. In retrospect it is becoming far too easy to get into spats on this list. And thank-you for your compliment on my age.. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: Greg Macaulay To: Kevin Wigle ; Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:57 PM Subject: RE: CCDA [7:2971] > Kevin, > > Despite your relative youth -- did it ever occur to you that the > Syngres/Osborne materials might be WRONG!!! Especially since Priscilla -- as > my aging brain recalls -- was once of the authors of the versions of the > CCDA exam. Who would know better -- the author (who was then employed by > Cisco [I believe] -- or the publisher of IT books?? > > As this thread takes its last gasp of breath -- I implore you to reconsider > whether your statement that a change indeed took place (about a year ago) or > whether its more likely that the publisher was in error. gasp . . .gasp . FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3889&t=2971 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA [7:2971]
Priscilla-- I know it doesn't matter anymore -- as I just said to Kevin W. I was simply taking time out from CCIe studies to "play" a bit. I certainly didn't intend for any of my words to be taken seriously. I am not an authority on anything! Just ask my grandchildren -- all 7 of them Again -- apologies if my words came across other than with pure humor!!! I'll try and be more careful in the future. Greg Macaulay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDA [7:2971] At 02:18 PM 5/9/01, Greg Macaulay wrote: >Kevin, > >Despite your relative youth -- did it ever occur to you that the >Syngres/Osborne materials might be WRONG!!! Especially since Priscilla -- as >my aging brain recalls -- was once of the authors of the versions of the >CCDA exam. Who would know better -- the author (who was then employed by >Cisco [I believe] -- or the publisher of IT books?? I didn't write any version of the CCDA exam. Testing design with multiple-choice questions and oversimplified case studies wasn't my idea! ;-) I wrote the Designing Cisco Networks Version 1.0 class. (I called it Designing Scalable Networks, actually.) It was an HTML-based class for internal Cisco Systems Engineers. It was simplified because the prerequisites to becoming a Cisco SE were already really high and the class didn't need to spell out the details. A lot of the materials were job aids -- charts that SEs could print and carry around in their pocket protectors -- not something that should EVER be asked in a "closed book" multiple-choice test. Somebody else turned my class into the certification program and it took on a life of its own, one that makes me cringe to be honest. Kids are like that. I thought CCDA never required CCNA but really I have no idea whether that's right. It doesn't matter anymore. Priscilla >As this thread takes its last gasp of breath -- I implore you to reconsider >whether your statement that a change indeed took place (about a year ago) or >whether its more likely that the publisher was in error. gasp . . .gasp . . >.gasp > >Greg Macaulay >Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth >Lifetime Member of AARP >Retired Attorney/Law Professor > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Kevin Wigle >Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 10:10 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: CCDA [7:2971] > > >granted! > >This thread got started because I thought I was reporting something "new" to >the group about certification. > >At one time Priscilla and the oldest NP/DP had me doubting my own memory >about what was required to get CCDA a while back. And now CCO and "newer" >books had me wondering also. > >It seems though that the change probably happened probably a year or so ago. > >Anyway, I'm happy this thread can die anytime now (as the group >heaps applause...) > >Kevin Wigle > >- Original Message - >From: "William E. Gragido" >To: >Sent: Sunday, 06 May, 2001 21:27 >Subject: RE: CCDA [7:2971] > > > > I think that most people just take the exams in that order: CCNA first >then > > the CCDA. I know thats what I did when I took them, it didn't cross my >mind > > to do it in an other way. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Kevin Wigle > > Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8:09 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: CCDA [7:2971] > > > > > > Hey! > > > > So I'm not loosing it - I was sure that was the case!! > > > > I can remember answering questions on this list about what you needed to >get > > CCDA. > > > > And since Jenny has given me faith again - I have found another book: > > > > Global Knowledge Certification Press > > Syngress/Osborne - CCNP, Cisco Internetwork Troubleshooting 4.0 > > Copyright 1999 > > ISBN 0-07-211912-8 > > > > which has a blurb on certification. Right there on page XXIX, table i-2 > > > > CCDA requires CCNA 1.0 (640-407) and CDS 1.0 (9E0-004) > > > > yes! > > > > just like the scene in STNG - "how many lights".. yes - it was 2 exams > > not 1 > > > > > > ummm, sorry about that - I got my composure back now - I think. > > > > But just a minute. there was this old DP/NP who was never > > mistaken... > > > > thanks Jenny! > > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, 06 May, 2001 19:42 > > Subject: Re: CCDA [7:2971] > > > > > > > It takes me by surprise, as I have a brochure from Geotrain (dating from > > > about 1998 I think - yeah, I'm a bit of a packrat - I think I can throw >it > > > out now :-) that states that CCNA certification is a prerequisite for > > CCDA. > > > At the time, test requirements for the CCDA were CCNA certification and > > CDS > > > exam #9E0-004. > > > CCDP required CCDA certification, ACRC, CLSC, CMTD and CID (or CCDA, > > > foundation
Re: Protocol Type 0x886F [7:3737]
I ran into this same problem at my current client. Apparently this is a necessary evil in a NT clustered environment for load balancing and fault tolerancy. There are two 1,514 byte packets sent every second by default. One to the MAC of the NIC and the other to the multicast address. The size of these packets cannot be adjusted but the interval of how often they occur can. The heartbeat can be set between 100 and 1 milliseconds (default is 1000). The time period before the device is determined dead can be set between 5 and 100 (default is 5). We did the following: Registry items alivestatus (aka AliveMsgPeriod) and aliveperiod (aka AliveMsgTolerance) were changed to 1 and 9 respectively. What this meant on the network was that there were only 6 pairs of heartbeats per minute instead of 60. This should be adjusted based on the organizations tolerance of a failure. HTH Darren At 12:47 AM 05/09/2001 -0400, Andy Prima wrote: >Dear all, >I need help on protocol type 0x886F. It seems that this kind of Ethernet >Broadcast is circling around my network and I do not have a clue what it >really is. > >TIA >andy >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Darren S. Crawford Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucent.com Network Systems Consultant - CCNA, CCIE Written "Providing the Power Operable Networks." *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3878&t=3737 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled reload [7:3869]
If by chance you wish to cancel the reload ... reload cancel will abort the count down. Roger -Original Message- From: Raul F. Fernandez-IGLOU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 12:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Scheduled reload [7:3869] Yes you can type "relaod at " Raul - Original Message - From: "Larry Ogun-Banjo" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:57 PM Subject: Scheduled reload [7:3869] > Does anyone know if there is a command to boot/reload a router on a future > date > ie some type of scheduler? > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3888&t=3869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863]
Woops! I guess I should proof my typing. Sorry about that. Kelly D Griffin, CCNA, CCDA Network Engineer Kg2 Network Design 877.418.4025 http://www.kg2.com - Original Message - From: "Lowell Sharrah" To: ; Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:19 PM Subject: Re: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863] > try sh frame-relay map > > >>> "Kelly D Griffin" 05/09/01 03:07PM >>> > sh frame-relay map pvc > > Kelly D Griffin, CCNA, CCDA > Network Engineer > Kg2 Network Design > 877.418.4025 > http://www.kg2.com=20 > - Original Message - > From: "Barry Kiesz"=20 > To:=20 > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:28 PM > Subject: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863] > > > > Is there a command on a Cisco router to query a FrameRelay switch to = > find > > out which DLCIs are pointed to it? > > > > Barry > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html=20 > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20= > > > > > http://1cis.com=20 > > Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes > > 1st Class Internet Solutions > > http://1cis.com=20 > Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes > 1st Class Internet Solutions > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/c= > isco.html=20 > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://1cis.com > Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes > 1st Class Internet Solutions http://1cis.com Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes 1st Class Internet Solutions Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3887&t=3863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled reload [7:3869]
If by chance you wish to cancel the reload ... will abort the count down. Roger -Original Message- From: Raul F. Fernandez-IGLOU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 12:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Scheduled reload [7:3869] Yes you can type "relaod at " Raul - Original Message - From: "Larry Ogun-Banjo" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:57 PM Subject: Scheduled reload [7:3869] > Does anyone know if there is a command to boot/reload a router on a future > date > ie some type of scheduler? > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3885&t=3869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled reload [7:3869]
R1#reload ? LINEReason for reload at Reload at a specific time/date cancel Cancel pending reload in Reload after a time interval It can be very useful. Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 5G Networks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (925) 260-2724 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Larry Ogun-Banjo > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Scheduled reload [7:3869] > > > Does anyone know if there is a command to boot/reload a router on a future > date > ie some type of scheduler? > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3886&t=3869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: security opinions please [7:3666]
Kent, If you look at my original message you will see that it says about How tos, which means Not to give away information that would help dishonest people. Discussion among Security, and IS professionals, I agree with. But that is what CERN, ISS, Bugtraq etc are for. I should have been more clear, but I was studying at 3AM last night. Do you know what Social Engineering means. I believe the U.S. Gov. was trying to shut down, these Security sites that give away information on how to do things that compromise networks. They are very concerned about Information warfare, and rightly so. Dan Evensen ccnawan wrote: > > In my experience I have been taught, it not a good idea to write about How > tos in regards to security in a open forum like this? - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:38 AM Subject: Re: security opinions please [7:3666] > Believing that keeping security questions in the dark increases > security is commonly referred to as "security through obscurity" > and is generally viewed as a bad idea by nearly everyone in the > security field. > > Attackers already know the exploits, not informing your peers > doesn't prevent attacks, it only assists the attackers. > > What you shouldn't do is provide unneeded information about ones > particular organization that might assist an attacker in attacking > your organization. > > Regards, > Kent > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9 May 2001, at 5:55, ccnawan wrote: > > > In my experience I have been taught, it not a good idea to write about > > How tos in regards to security in a open forum like this? Dan Evensen > > > > > >How does one go upon "penetrating" the internal VLAN on a > > switch while only > >having access to the external VLAN and not > > traversing the PIX in the > >middle? > >I have heard the response from > > numerous security engineers that anything is > >possible however I > > guess I'm a novice because I have never seen nor heard > >of > >this > > being done in the situation mentioned above. I attribute the idea of > > > >physically seperating these networks (even though VLAN based > > seperation is > >just as effective) as security paranoia. This isn't > > necessarily a bad > >thing, after all that's what security guys are > > paid for, however I don't > >see > >a technical reason why you can't > > have these VLANs connected to the same box > >as long as a properly > > configured firewall logically seperates them. > > Launching a DoS on > > these devices is pretty easy, anything which transports > data for > > management can be 'hacked'. > > Rob./ > > > > __ > > ___ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > > http://www.hotmail.com. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and > > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and > > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3884&t=3666 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863]
try sh frame-relay map >>> "Kelly D Griffin" 05/09/01 03:07PM >>> sh frame-relay map pvc Kelly D Griffin, CCNA, CCDA Network Engineer Kg2 Network Design 877.418.4025 http://www.kg2.com - Original Message - From: "Barry Kiesz" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:28 PM Subject: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863] > Is there a command on a Cisco router to query a FrameRelay switch to find > out which DLCIs are pointed to it? > > Barry > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://1cis.com > Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes > 1st Class Internet Solutions http://1cis.com Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes 1st Class Internet Solutions FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3883&t=3863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1601+2501 routers trading for a 2621 router or a Catalyst 2901 [7:3882]
Hi folks, I have a 1601 router with 4meg flash and 16meg dram and a 2501 router with 16megs of flash and 16megs of dram that I would like to trade for either a Catalyst 2901 that runs CatOS. Please reply if interested. -Frank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3882&t=3882 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Central Hub Site with six T1's. [7:3841]
I also would consider frame relay as a choice, you can get it up to full t1 speed, the cost is often lower than t1, and telco monitors them more closely. If you are committed to separate t1s, and the possibility of bringing in an isp link and bgp peering pops up, you'll want a beefy 3600 or 7204vxr. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Wed, 9 May 2001, SJ wrote: > Hello, > > I hope everyone is doing well today. Since this is my first time > writing to the Cisco groupstudy I would like to say that I am glad to be a > member. As each of you I to hope to someday reach CCIE status. However, as > all of us I have to support myself and my family so work is always number > one priority. With that being said I have a work related question. I have > a customer who has 6 remote sites and a central site. Each remote site will > be tied into the hub (central site) via T1's. Frame relay is not an option > because all of the sites are within about 15 miles of the central site I > have chosen as their hub, and their bandwidth needs are such that a T1 is > feasible. So, now to my question. Which cisco router supports 6 or more T1 > connections. This customer is on a limited budget, as such I will be > deploying cisco 1750's at each remote site, however I want to tie all of the > remote sites into the central site, so I need a router with enough > interfaces to support 6 or more T1's. My goal is that each remote site will > have default routes to the central site, and at the central site I will > create static routes to the remote sites, as there is no need to run a > routing protocol in this configuration. Can anyone give me a good central > site router (cheap) that supports six or more T1 interfaces. > > > > > Thanks, > > > SJ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3881&t=3841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ATM AAL5 errors [7:3682]
Is cell-scrambling enabled? On both ends? -Original Message- From: David Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 7:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ATM AAL5 errors [7:3682] #1. The source device encapsulates whatever traffic it has to send in a AAL5 PDU then segments the PDU and places the pieces of the PDU into the payload of the ATM cells. #2. AAL5 is almost always is used in UBR (unspecified bit rate) calls. ie: No garuntee from the carrier that they will deliver your cell to the destination. #3. During times of congestion the carrier will drop cells in a UBR call. #4. If a cell (or cells) are dropped within the carrier's network; the AAL5 PDU's CRC will be invalid. #5. There is a EOF (end of frame) bit within the Cell header; which tells the destination when it has recieved the last cell comprising the AAL5 PDU. #6. If the EOF cell is lost then the destination will try to recombine 2 (or more) AAL5 PDUs possibly resulting in a PDU that is too large. OR If the only cell comprising a AAL5 PDU made it through the network was the EOF cell then the destination will find that the reassembled AAL5 PDU is smaller than the min allowed This is a Breif overwiew of what ATM does and why you'll see AAL5 errors. There are always ifs and buts and a million little details; BUT I won't get into those PS: if the errored AAL5 frames are not over 1% then don't worry about it. DaveC Q wrote: > > I'm getting AAL5 CRC and AAL5 Length errors. They are both tied to one > another in terms of rate of errors. This is a difficult problem in terms > that they are both related. One problem is that the other sidce of the WAN > is a Cabletron SSR 8600 hunk oof crap. Someone give me a clue...TIA! > > marc > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3880&t=3682 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled reload [7:3869]
"reload at 13:00 may 9" will schedule a reload at 1PM on May 9th. -Original Message- From: Larry Ogun-Banjo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Scheduled reload [7:3869] Does anyone know if there is a command to boot/reload a router on a future date ie some type of scheduler? FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3879&t=3869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduled reload [7:3869]
try these commands: rtr1#reload at ? hh:mm Time to reload (hh:mm) rtr1#reload in ? Delay before reload (mmm or hhh:mm) HTH -- Mark - CCNP, CCDP "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein ""Larry Ogun-Banjo"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know if there is a command to boot/reload a router on a future > date > ie some type of scheduler? > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3877&t=3869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Scheduled reload [7:3869]
Yes you can type "relaod at " Raul - Original Message - From: "Larry Ogun-Banjo" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:57 PM Subject: Scheduled reload [7:3869] > Does anyone know if there is a command to boot/reload a router on a future > date > ie some type of scheduler? > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3876&t=3869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863]
B, You can debug frame-relay lmi watch the debug periodically it will tell you what dlci your router should be configured for. HTH kv - Original Message - From: "Barry Kiesz" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:28 AM Subject: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863] > Is there a command on a Cisco router to query a FrameRelay switch to find > out which DLCIs are pointed to it? > > Barry > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3874&t=3863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled reload [7:3869]
reload in [hh:]mm [text] The following example illustrates how to use the reload command to reload the software on the router on the current day at 7:30 p.m.: Router# reload at 19:30 Reload scheduled for 19:30:00 UTC Wed Jun 5 1996 (in 2 hours and 25 minutes) Proceed with reload? [confirm] The following example illustrates how to use the reload command to reload the software on the router at a future time: Router# reload at 02:00 jun 20 Reload scheduled for 02:00:00 UTC Thu Jun 20 1996 (in 344 hours and 53 minutes) Proceed with reload? [confirm] -Original Message- From: Larry Ogun-Banjo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 9 May 2001 2:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Scheduled reload [7:3869] Does anyone know if there is a command to boot/reload a router on a future date ie some type of scheduler? FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3875&t=3869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863]
I think you want Show Frame-Relay PVC. Erich - Original Message - From: "Barry Kiesz" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:28 AM Subject: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863] > Is there a command on a Cisco router to query a FrameRelay switch to find > out which DLCIs are pointed to it? > > Barry > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://1cis.com > Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes > 1st Class Internet Solutions http://1cis.com Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes 1st Class Internet Solutions Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3873&t=3863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863]
Have you tried "show fr pvc" > -Original Message- > From: Barry Kiesz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863] > > > Is there a command on a Cisco router to query a FrameRelay > switch to find > out which DLCIs are pointed to it? > > Barry > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3872&t=3863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863]
sh frame-relay map pvc Kelly D Griffin, CCNA, CCDA Network Engineer Kg2 Network Design 877.418.4025 http://www.kg2.com - Original Message - From: "Barry Kiesz" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:28 PM Subject: Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863] > Is there a command on a Cisco router to query a FrameRelay switch to find > out which DLCIs are pointed to it? > > Barry > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://1cis.com > Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes > 1st Class Internet Solutions http://1cis.com Free E-mail Servers with unlimited mailboxes 1st Class Internet Solutions Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3871&t=3863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE or CCDA. CID [7:3795]
Upon the advice of posts here and at other sites, I decided to knock out my CCDP before taking the CCIE written. After taking both tests (and passing) I agree with the reasoning. The CID is extremely similar to the CCIE written. I studied for a month for the CID but only needed two weeks of studying (after passing the CID) for the CCIE written (bridging, RIF's, you know the story...) Nothing was on the CCIE written that I felt was used for the CID exclusively (i.e. didn't need to study for the CCIE). I also agree with what Robert writes about the CCDP - not really recognized yet but that's what makes it alluring. Good luck, Sean C. CCNP, CCDP, MCSE Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3870&t=3795 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scheduled reload [7:3869]
Does anyone know if there is a command to boot/reload a router on a future date ie some type of scheduler? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3869&t=3869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: security opinions please [7:3666]
Agreed. The question doesn't relate directly to a 6509 but more towards the security of VLAN's and the separation of broadcast domains via software. >From there depending on your perspective the focus changes to the specific flaws and exploits relating to the subject of VLANs (optimistic view) or to the higher level view which includes the history of security exploits in general and the risks associated in relying on software versus hardware (pessimistic view). Although I like to think I'm somewhat security savvy I've always been a geek at heart trying to play with the latest and greatest in speed and features with a casual glance in the security direction. Although I still stand by my opinion of using a 6509 with both internal and external VLANs, I think most people focused strictly on security would agree with Kent... Cheers, -Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 12:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: security opinions please [7:3666] Perhaps I wasn't clear, so let me re-phrase: "Suppose the code running on the Catalyst 6509 switch has a bug that causes VLAN failures of various sorts." In the configuration that started this thread, this could lead to external networks having direct access to internal networks. This is completely different from any layer 3 problems, but the core issue is that if you setup your security perimeter to rely on lots of things being configured correctly and lots of software not having bugs, your asking for trouble. The question was about a 6509, but the problem is more generic. Simply asking "is there a specific problem with the 6509 and VLANs" misses the point entirely. Regards, Kent On 9 May 2001, at 18:27, Jacques Atlas wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > |For example, what if a bug occured under certain network > |conditions that caused a switch to lose its VLAN configuration, > |even though the config showed they were there? > > that is like saying what happens if the router drop a route or > even a packet. > > i thought we were ment to be talking about 65xx's and vlans on them ? > > -- > jacques FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3868&t=3666 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help [7:3861]
Did you make a typo ref VLan 155? The error states VLan 1 Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: Shane Stockman To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:23 PM Subject: Help [7:3861] > I have a switch with a MSFC and it is giving me a routing error as follows: > > 1d02h: IP-EIGRP: Neighbor 172.16.155.1 not on common subnet for Vlan1 > > I have checked every thing I can think of but it all looks fine.I cannot see > VLAN 155 due to this error ( ping or telnet ). > > Here is the contents of my sh ver: > > IOS (tm) MSFC Software (C6MSFC-IS-M), Version 12.0(7)XE1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT > RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info > Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Fri 04-Feb-00 00:28 by lstringr > Image text-base: 0x60008900, data-base: 0x60CBC000 > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(3)XE, RELEASE SOFTWARE > BOOTFLASH: MSFC Software (C6MSFC-IS-M), Version 12.0(7)XE1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT > REL > EASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > > ZA002002 uptime is 4 days, 2 hours, 45 minutes > System returned to ROM by reload > Running default software > > cisco Cat6k-MSFC (R5000) processor with 122880K/8192K bytes of memory. > Processor board ID SAD0408037F > R5000 CPU at 200Mhz, Implementation 35, Rev 2.1, 512KB L2 Cache > Last reset from power-on > Bridging software. > X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. > 33 Virtual Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) > --More-- > 123K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. > 4096K bytes of packet SRAM memory. > > 16384K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K). > Configuration register is 0x102 > Any help would be appreciated > Thanks > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3867&t=3861 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA [7:2971]
At 02:18 PM 5/9/01, Greg Macaulay wrote: >Kevin, > >Despite your relative youth -- did it ever occur to you that the >Syngres/Osborne materials might be WRONG!!! Especially since Priscilla -- as >my aging brain recalls -- was once of the authors of the versions of the >CCDA exam. Who would know better -- the author (who was then employed by >Cisco [I believe] -- or the publisher of IT books?? I didn't write any version of the CCDA exam. Testing design with multiple-choice questions and oversimplified case studies wasn't my idea! ;-) I wrote the Designing Cisco Networks Version 1.0 class. (I called it Designing Scalable Networks, actually.) It was an HTML-based class for internal Cisco Systems Engineers. It was simplified because the prerequisites to becoming a Cisco SE were already really high and the class didn't need to spell out the details. A lot of the materials were job aids -- charts that SEs could print and carry around in their pocket protectors -- not something that should EVER be asked in a "closed book" multiple-choice test. Somebody else turned my class into the certification program and it took on a life of its own, one that makes me cringe to be honest. Kids are like that. I thought CCDA never required CCNA but really I have no idea whether that's right. It doesn't matter anymore. Priscilla >As this thread takes its last gasp of breath -- I implore you to reconsider >whether your statement that a change indeed took place (about a year ago) or >whether its more likely that the publisher was in error. gasp . . .gasp . . >.gasp > >Greg Macaulay >Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth >Lifetime Member of AARP >Retired Attorney/Law Professor > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Kevin Wigle >Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 10:10 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: CCDA [7:2971] > > >granted! > >This thread got started because I thought I was reporting something "new" to >the group about certification. > >At one time Priscilla and the oldest NP/DP had me doubting my own memory >about what was required to get CCDA a while back. And now CCO and "newer" >books had me wondering also. > >It seems though that the change probably happened probably a year or so ago. > >Anyway, I'm happy this thread can die anytime now (as the group >heaps applause...) > >Kevin Wigle > >- Original Message - >From: "William E. Gragido" >To: >Sent: Sunday, 06 May, 2001 21:27 >Subject: RE: CCDA [7:2971] > > > > I think that most people just take the exams in that order: CCNA first >then > > the CCDA. I know thats what I did when I took them, it didn't cross my >mind > > to do it in an other way. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Kevin Wigle > > Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8:09 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: CCDA [7:2971] > > > > > > Hey! > > > > So I'm not loosing it - I was sure that was the case!! > > > > I can remember answering questions on this list about what you needed to >get > > CCDA. > > > > And since Jenny has given me faith again - I have found another book: > > > > Global Knowledge Certification Press > > Syngress/Osborne - CCNP, Cisco Internetwork Troubleshooting 4.0 > > Copyright 1999 > > ISBN 0-07-211912-8 > > > > which has a blurb on certification. Right there on page XXIX, table i-2 > > > > CCDA requires CCNA 1.0 (640-407) and CDS 1.0 (9E0-004) > > > > yes! > > > > just like the scene in STNG - "how many lights".. yes - it was 2 exams > > not 1 > > > > > > ummm, sorry about that - I got my composure back now - I think. > > > > But just a minute. there was this old DP/NP who was never > > mistaken... > > > > thanks Jenny! > > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, 06 May, 2001 19:42 > > Subject: Re: CCDA [7:2971] > > > > > > > It takes me by surprise, as I have a brochure from Geotrain (dating from > > > about 1998 I think - yeah, I'm a bit of a packrat - I think I can throw >it > > > out now :-) that states that CCNA certification is a prerequisite for > > CCDA. > > > At the time, test requirements for the CCDA were CCNA certification and > > CDS > > > exam #9E0-004. > > > CCDP required CCDA certification, ACRC, CLSC, CMTD and CID (or CCDA, > > > foundation and CID). > > > JMcL > > > -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 07/05/2001 > > > 09:13 am --- > > > > > > > > > "Priscilla Oppenheimer" @groupstudy.com on 05/05/2001 > > > 04:47:53 am > > > > > > Please respond to "Priscilla Oppenheimer" > > > > > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > cc: > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: CCDA [7:2971] > > > > > > > > > CCDA never required CCNA. CCDP always has and still does. That takes a >lot > > > of people by surprise. > > > > > > I may be one of the older CCDPs!? I used to tell my ag
Re: CCDA [7:2971]
Gee, I don't what kind of backlog you have in reading this list but I thought it was agreed that yes it has changed. Another poster confirmed as much in her posting (I'll let you find it in the archives) with information from a different source. Actually that post is farther down this very same email that you forwarded to the list. And I think I can remember that Priscilla commented that that change was before her CCDA time, I could be wrong on that. So, why are you picking on me? I thought things were going along great with just the right amount of humour. Of course if you didn't recognize the humour I apologize. So I guess you're saying that she is wrong also (the other poster of course) .. well so be it if that makes you happy. At least I'm not alone. In retrospect it is becoming far too easy to get into spats on this list. And thank-you for your compliment on my age.. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: Greg Macaulay To: Kevin Wigle ; Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:57 PM Subject: RE: CCDA [7:2971] > Kevin, > > Despite your relative youth -- did it ever occur to you that the > Syngres/Osborne materials might be WRONG!!! Especially since Priscilla -- as > my aging brain recalls -- was once of the authors of the versions of the > CCDA exam. Who would know better -- the author (who was then employed by > Cisco [I believe] -- or the publisher of IT books?? > > As this thread takes its last gasp of breath -- I implore you to reconsider > whether your statement that a change indeed took place (about a year ago) or > whether its more likely that the publisher was in error. gasp . . .gasp . FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Querying the FR Switch for DLCIs [7:3863]
Is there a command on a Cisco router to query a FrameRelay switch to find out which DLCIs are pointed to it? Barry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3863&t=3863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
