Off topic: Syslog Server [7:36360]
I have a sun box with solaris 5.6 which I need to convert into a syslog server.I am very new to this and would like to know how to setup the ip address and the files so that it does logging.I would like to point some of my cisco routers to it. Thanks _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36360&t=36360 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: beta exams [7:36356]
Hi, I've just taken the Remote Access Beta exam. 153 questions in 3 hours. Results due in 8-12 weeks (according to the Beta exam receipt) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > anybody given beta exams in here in the past? > currently the ccnp track exams are in for beta.. today being the last > day. I was gonna take them when I read that results would be out only > after 8-12 weeks. > 140 questions/3 hours. these exams are of a different format too so > chance of passing is reduced i guess. $50 is the price. > > Or is it that cisco sees to it that a certain %age of people who give > these exams pass out? > If its so, then chances for somebody well-prepared are pretty good. > somebody, please guide. > thx. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36361&t=36356 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How does repeater work? [7:36323]
The classical repeater as described in the first couple of chapters of nearly every networking/internetworking technologies survey is a little before my time, but here are some thoughts: -bridges are often described as multi-port repeaters, leaving the impression that mere repeaters have but a single port (please note, that the coinage described might involve distinguishing ingress from egress ports, but that's hardly clear to the uninitiated). I suppose that an argument might be made to lend legitimacy to the practice of contrasting the prefix multi with something other than a term specifically denoting "one" or "single", but I'm not sure how relevant that will turn out to be as time erodes those cases without corroborating evidence. -to the extent that the purpose of the repeater is to extend a LAN, one might picture a device with two cables (or other data-traversing-friendly media) attached: one connected to the original network, one connected to the extension. I'm honestly not sure how else it would function. -to the extent that the characterization i've provided is accurate, it might be useful to apply bridging concepts in order to discern the functionality of the repeater. A bridge accepts packets on a given port and, by charter, does NOT transmit replicas of those packets on the same (ingress) port. I therefore picture a repeater as a device that has 2 connections: one to the original network, one to the LAN extension. If this is the case, I would presume that the relevant functionality is to perpetuate packets received on one port to the other. If that is the case, the repeater cannot be said to create a loop. Note: if a loop already exists, the repeater would perpetuate that condition, by design. All: as I mentioned, repeaters ceased to be relevant before my time. If anyone knows differently about the topics I've alluded to, please post your dissenting statement. Thanks, - Original Message - From: "mlh" To: Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: How does repeater work? [7:36323] > Could anybody tell me how repeaters work ? I don't understand how repeater > can regenerate > the two-way signals from both segment connected to the repeater. Isn't it > forming a loop? > Pls forgive me asking the stupid question. > > Thanks in advance. > > mlh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36362&t=36323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: Syslog Server [7:36360]
Hi Shane, go to: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/intsolns/as5xipmo/sysmgt.htm#xtocid14874 and click on the 'Task 2. Enabling Syslog' link, this gives you a good overview of the process. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36363&t=36360 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF - Type 4 [7:36358]
Hi Venkat, both type 3 and type 4 are generated by Area Border routers. Type 3 describes routes to networks, also used for aggregating routes. Type 4 describes routes to ASBR. Summary Links (type 3) are identified by the IP network numbers of the destinations they are pointing at. ASBR Summary Links (Summary Links type 4) are identified by the RID of the ASBR. That means that type 3 LSAs cannot carry information regarding the ASBR, and that's why you need a type 4 LSA to reach the ASBR. Since a router in stub area must send a packet to the ABR to reach the ASBR, no matter what the external destination, there is no need to flood type 4 LSAs into a stub area. Hope this helps. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36364&t=36358 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fiber optic interface question [7:36366]
Hello, I am about to purchase a Fiber Optic Interface; because this kind of cards are pretty expensive I prefer to ask you in order do not buy the wrong interface. Can I connect this two cards: PA-POS-OC3SMI and PA-A3-OC3SMI?. We are going to use single mode fiber and it is Mid Range. Thanks in advanced. Alejandro Acosta Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36366&t=36366 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How does repeater work? [7:36323]
You might try whatis.com for an answer. You might also look for an RFC at the RFC Index for repeater. A quick search at ftp://ftp.isi.edu/ietf/1rfc_index.txt yeilds: RFC: 1368, 1516, 2108, & 2266 as matching on the word Repeater. Peter Dyson in his Dictionary of Networking defines it as: repeater A simple hardware device that moves all packets from one local-area network segment to another by regenerating, retiming, and amplifying the electrical signals. The main purpose of a repeater is to extend the length of the network transmission medium beyond the normal maximum cable lengths Jim -Original Message- From: mlh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 14:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How does repeater work? [7:36323] Could anybody tell me how repeaters work ? I don't understand how repeater can regenerate the two-way signals from both segment connected to the repeater. Isn't it forming a loop? Pls forgive me asking the stupid question. Thanks in advance. mlh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36367&t=36323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IGP and millisecond convergence time [7:36368]
There was a paper published by PacketDesign 1-2 years ago which suggested that features like MPLS fast-reconvergence were solving a problem which could be better done by getting IGP protocols to re-converge faster. There was some discussion that IGPs could be updated to support this (much bigger pipes means one could sending hellos much more periodically; running new forms of SPF which only re-computed the part of the tree which would change, etc.) I see that there was an IS-IS ID published in 2000 that discussed these topics. The ID has since expired and so I don't know the real content of what was proposed. Looks like this work was also presented at Nanog 20. It doesn't look like this ID became an RFC. Anyone have an idea where the technology is around fast reconvergence? Are folks still thinking that it can be done by IGPs alone or must we use other mechanisms (MPLS fast-reconvergence, DPT/RPR, etc.)? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36368&t=36368 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VIC-2BRI S/T TE [7:36369]
Hi everybody; I configured a Cisco2610 router with VIC-2BRI S/T TE and NM-2V voice module for VoIP applications.The router runs with IOS c2600-is-mz.121-1 But I could not achived to make voice call with remote site. Actually I dial my BRI number get the dial tone and dial the remote sites number (which has FXS with 1750-2V) and achieved conversation without any problem. But when I tried from FXS to BRI, I could not achieved. My call comes to Cisco2610 but I can not dial any other digits and in 10sc the call disconnects. Any quick suggestions... ? Thanks alot... Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36369&t=36369 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VIC-2BRI S/T TE [7:36370]
Hi everybody; I configured a Cisco2610 router with VIC-BRI S/T TE and NM-2V voice module for VoIP applications.The router runs with IOS c2600-is-mz.121-1 But I could not achived to make voice call with remote site. Actually I dial my BRI number get the dial tone and dial the remote sites number (which has FXS with 1750-2V) and achieved conversation without any problem. But when I tried from FXS to BRI, I could not achieved. My call comes to Cisco2610 but I can not dial any other digits and in 10sc the call disconnects. Any quick responses... Thanks alot. Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36370&t=36370 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could do the change automatically to the other active isp. It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each one, how to route accross the other good gateway. Thnx in advance Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36371&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How does repeater work? [7:36323]
Actually, repeaters are not the same as bridges. Repeaters operate at layer 1 of the OSI model, bridges at layer 2. Hubs are multiport repeaters, and switches are multiport bridges. Repeaters were used in the days when Thicknet and Thinnet Ethernet ruled the world, and extend the cable segment. Mike Dickson MCSE+Internet, MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP Dickson Network Designs voice (512)-422-3192 fax (512) 394-0320 www.dicksonnetworks.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Cullimore Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How does repeater work? [7:36323] The classical repeater as described in the first couple of chapters of nearly every networking/internetworking technologies survey is a little before my time, but here are some thoughts: -bridges are often described as multi-port repeaters, leaving the impression that mere repeaters have but a single port (please note, that the coinage described might involve distinguishing ingress from egress ports, but that's hardly clear to the uninitiated). I suppose that an argument might be made to lend legitimacy to the practice of contrasting the prefix multi with something other than a term specifically denoting "one" or "single", but I'm not sure how relevant that will turn out to be as time erodes those cases without corroborating evidence. -to the extent that the purpose of the repeater is to extend a LAN, one might picture a device with two cables (or other data-traversing-friendly media) attached: one connected to the original network, one connected to the extension. I'm honestly not sure how else it would function. -to the extent that the characterization i've provided is accurate, it might be useful to apply bridging concepts in order to discern the functionality of the repeater. A bridge accepts packets on a given port and, by charter, does NOT transmit replicas of those packets on the same (ingress) port. I therefore picture a repeater as a device that has 2 connections: one to the original network, one to the LAN extension. If this is the case, I would presume that the relevant functionality is to perpetuate packets received on one port to the other. If that is the case, the repeater cannot be said to create a loop. Note: if a loop already exists, the repeater would perpetuate that condition, by design. All: as I mentioned, repeaters ceased to be relevant before my time. If anyone knows differently about the topics I've alluded to, please post your dissenting statement. Thanks, - Original Message - From: "mlh" To: Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: How does repeater work? [7:36323] > Could anybody tell me how repeaters work ? I don't understand how repeater > can regenerate > the two-way signals from both segment connected to the repeater. Isn't it > forming a loop? > Pls forgive me asking the stupid question. > > Thanks in advance. > > mlh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36372&t=36323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Depends alot on what kind of connection you want. If you are just talking about outbound access from your site, that isn't a problem. Setup the two routers on the same subnet and use HSRP. Best practive would be to set up two HSRP address; each router will be primarary for one address and backup for the other. That way you can direct traffic over a specific connection when it's all up, but traffic will failover to one connection if the other goes down. If, on the other hand, you want to maintain public services during an outage (ie, web pages, FTP sites, incoming e-mail), that is a gorilla of a completly different color. If you're site is big enough, you could justify a /19 public address, which can be routed via BGP. That would solve alot of you're problems, but it's unlikely that you'd be asking the question if you had a /19. Some protocols will allow you to specifiy a backup via DNS (I'm thinking SMTP), but that only helps with mail. Otherwise, you're options are co-locateing the equipment you always want available, or switching both your WAN connections to the same ISP. THere is no really easy solution. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36374&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
You would want to use both HSRP and BGP in this case. HSRP will solve the problem of changing the default gateway on the clients when a link fails. BGP will be used for fault tolerance at the ISP side. Here is a sample doc I got form the cisco site: http://www.v-man.net/support/pdf/hsrp_bgp.pdf ""Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers > and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of > one of my servers, because one isp is failure. > I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could > do the change automatically to the other active isp. > It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of > my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. > So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each > one, how to route accross the other good gateway. > > Thnx in advance > Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36375&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VIC-2BRI S/T TE [7:36369]
My first guess would be lack of DTMF relay, but I'm afraid I don't have enough information to fully diagnose this. If there is no DTMF relay configured, it's possible the secondary dialed digits are not being received by the 2610. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36376&t=36369 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Question [7:36352]
Hi Hunt, I did some research and found this: Hello packets behave differently depending on the network type as described below. Point-to-point Network Neighbor discovery is dynamic Hello is sent to the multicast address AllSPFRouter (224.0.0.5) No DR/BDR election Broadcast Network Neighbor discovery is dynamic Hello is sent to the multicast address AllSPFRouter (224.0.0.5) DR/BDR election takes place NBMA Network A configuration is required in order to discover the neighbor Hello is sent unicast to each remote neighbor's IP address DR/BDR election takes place Note that since DR/BDR takes place, you would need at least a connection from DR/BDR to all the neighbors in order to guarantee the proper operation in this mode. DR/BDR sends Hello to all routers A router is eligible to become DR/BDR (priority different than 0) and it sends Hello packets only to DR/BDR and those routers that are eligible to become DR/BDR A router not eligible to become DR/BDR (priority 0) sends Hello packets only to DR/BDR Point-to-Multipoint Network Point-to-multipoint is considered a collection of point-to-point networks. Depending on the configuration, neighbor discovery could be dynamic. ip ospf network point-to-point Neighbor discovery is dynamic Hello is sent to the multicast address AllSPFRouter (224.0.0.5) No DR/BDR election In this case the Hello is sent to the multicast address AllSPFRouter and replicates the packet over each connection. It is important to note that the connection should be permanent (PVC) and not dynamic (SVC) as this would fail. ip ospf network point-to-multipoint non-broadcast A configuration is required in order to discover the neighbor Hello is unicast to each remote neighbor IP address Hope this helps. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36377&t=36352 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
For the outbound connectivity, use the HSRP track feature. That "watches" an interface (the WAN link to your ISP). If that interface goes down, the HSRP priority of that router gets reduced, making the other router (with the good ISP link) the HSRP primary. HSRP will make it so no changes are required at your server. As mentioned if you have Internet facing servers (mail server, web server), you really need BGP. However many ISPs will now accept advertisements as small as /24. So if you have a class C of registered addresses (or if you can get that) you can advertise it to both ISPs via BGP (even if it was assigned to you by one of the ISPs). Rob. CCIE 6922 ""Chris Charlebois"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Depends alot on what kind of connection you want. If you are just talking > about outbound access from your site, that isn't a problem. Setup the two > routers on the same subnet and use HSRP. Best practive would be to set up > two HSRP address; each router will be primarary for one address and backup > for the other. That way you can direct traffic over a specific connection > when it's all up, but traffic will failover to one connection if the other > goes down. > > If, on the other hand, you want to maintain public services during an outage > (ie, web pages, FTP sites, incoming e-mail), that is a gorilla of a > completly different color. If you're site is big enough, you could justify > a /19 public address, which can be routed via BGP. That would solve alot of > you're problems, but it's unlikely that you'd be asking the question if you > had a /19. Some protocols will allow you to specifiy a backup via DNS (I'm > thinking SMTP), but that only helps with mail. Otherwise, you're options > are co-locateing the equipment you always want available, or switching both > your WAN connections to the same ISP. THere is no really easy solution. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36378&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]+ Some details of my net [7:36379]
Hello The mail server have 2 ips one for 65.169.240. and the second 169.158.32. network. This is de configuration havae in my server:. NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=MailServer #GATEWAY=169.158.32.1 GATEWAY=65.169.240.209 In this moment my gateway is 65.169.240.209, because the other (commented with #) is down, so i have to do tha manually and restart the network service I thanks to you i study how to do it with HSRP. And study how this changes affects my mail server. So when 169.158.32. is down. I have to to manually the change of gateways ""Chris Charlebois"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Depends alot on what kind of connection you want. If you are just talking > about outbound access from your site, that isn't a problem. Setup the two > routers on the same subnet and use HSRP. Best practive would be to set up > two HSRP address; each router will be primarary for one address and backup > for the other. That way you can direct traffic over a specific connection > when it's all up, but traffic will failover to one connection if the other > goes down. > > If, on the other hand, you want to maintain public services during an outage > (ie, web pages, FTP sites, incoming e-mail), that is a gorilla of a > completly different color. If you're site is big enough, you could justify > a /19 public address, which can be routed via BGP. That would solve alot of > you're problems, but it's unlikely that you'd be asking the question if you > had a /19. Some protocols will allow you to specifiy a backup via DNS (I'm > thinking SMTP), but that only helps with mail. Otherwise, you're options > are co-locateing the equipment you always want available, or switching both > your WAN connections to the same ISP. THere is no really easy solution. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36379&t=36379 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
chances are bgp will not be availablefirst..he has to have the address
space...second...if he didn't plan for it before hand, he's probably got a
couple'a 2500's or 2600's Try running bgp on a 2500. (unless of
course he uses the same isp for both connections and they work with him on
setting up redundancy) But at that point he still would not have his own
asn for bgp...
-Patrick
>>> "sam sneed" 02/25/02 10:46AM >>>
You would want to use both HSRP and BGP in this case. HSRP will solve the
problem of changing the default gateway on the clients when a link fails.
BGP will be used for fault tolerance at the ISP side. Here is a sample doc I
got form the cisco site:
http://www.v-man.net/support/pdf/hsrp_bgp.pdf
""Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco
routers
> and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of
> one of my servers, because one isp is failure.
> I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i
could
> do the change automatically to the other active isp.
> It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one
of
> my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server.
> So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp
each
> one, how to route accross the other good gateway.
>
> Thnx in advance
> Yassl
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36380&t=36371
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]+ Some details of my [7:36381]
wow...At this point I hope nobody is scanning archives for ip addresses...
>>> "Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay" 02/25/02 10:56AM >>>
Hello
The mail server have 2 ips one for 65.169.240. and the second 169.158.32.
network.
This is de configuration havae in my server:.
NETWORKING=yes
HOSTNAME=MailServer
#GATEWAY=169.158.32.1
GATEWAY=65.169.240.209
In this moment my gateway is 65.169.240.209, because the other (commented
with #) is down, so i have to do tha manually and restart the network
service
I thanks to you i study how to do it with HSRP. And study how this changes
affects my mail server.
So when 169.158.32. is down. I have to to manually the change of gateways
""Chris Charlebois"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Depends alot on what kind of connection you want. If you are just talking
> about outbound access from your site, that isn't a problem. Setup the two
> routers on the same subnet and use HSRP. Best practive would be to set up
> two HSRP address; each router will be primarary for one address and backup
> for the other. That way you can direct traffic over a specific connection
> when it's all up, but traffic will failover to one connection if the other
> goes down.
>
> If, on the other hand, you want to maintain public services during an
outage
> (ie, web pages, FTP sites, incoming e-mail), that is a gorilla of a
> completly different color. If you're site is big enough, you could
justify
> a /19 public address, which can be routed via BGP. That would solve alot
of
> you're problems, but it's unlikely that you'd be asking the question if
you
> had a /19. Some protocols will allow you to specifiy a backup via DNS
(I'm
> thinking SMTP), but that only helps with mail. Otherwise, you're options
> are co-locateing the equipment you always want available, or switching
both
> your WAN connections to the same ISP. THere is no really easy solution.
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36381&t=36381
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
>Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers >and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of >one of my servers, because one isp is failure. >I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could >do the change automatically to the other active isp. >It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of >my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. >So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each >one, how to route accross the other good gateway. > >Thnx in advance >Yassl Can you run HSRP between the two gateways and tell the servers to use the virtual HSRP address as the default gateway? Assuming one router goes to one ISP and the other goes to the other ISP, and the two BGP routers are iBGP connected, it should work -- the server shouldn't care which router it exits. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36382&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please help me answer this question [7:36295]
C. A firewall has the capability of blocking traffic from certain sites. A. This is incorrect because the firewall cannot distinguish between a SEC-filed Annual report placed on a public internet website and a Work-in-progress-next-year's-Annual-Report placed on an intranet website on the same server. -Original Message- From: Love Cisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please help me answer this question [7:36295] 1. Which of the following customers can probably meet their security requirements with a simple firewall system? A. Company ABC wants to make sure customers can see public marketing data but not proprietary sales figures. B. University ABC want to make sure students can see but not change their grades in administrative database. C. Company XYZ wants to make sure employees do not download software from unauthorized site. D. University XYZ wants to make sure that public central software developed at the university stops working after a period of time if the user does not pay shareware fees. = I think C is right. But some people think A. What do you think? Why? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36383&t=36295 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catlyst 2926T [7:36335]
Hello Colin, according to the Cisco site, as long as you have a minimum of 16MB DRAM (which you have), software release 4.x is fully supported. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36384&t=36335 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
HSRP on the Ethernet Interfaces of your 2 routers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could do the change automatically to the other active isp. It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each one, how to route accross the other good gateway. Thnx in advance Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36385&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Hi. To maintain uninterrupted services even if one of your ISP's Fail, you need to run BGP. I created a "basics of BGP" document on [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I'm posting it here. I am a consultant looking for work, if you decide to implement BGP, I would like to help. ---Begin crosspost--- 1. Talk to your ISP's and see if they will let you peer with them. This isn't a question that the average helpdesk person is going to be able to answer, so you may have to work your way up the food chain. If the answer is no, then select a new ISP. 2. Apply for a Autonomous Sytem Number from Arin. This Requires ARIN membership ($500 one-time, $30 annual). If you are not in the continental US, substitute RIPE or APNIC for ARIN. 3. Acquire a minimum of a /24 (256 Ip's) from at least one of your ISP's. 4. Acquire the following information from each of your ISP's. 4a. Ip Address of the Peer 4b. AS# of the peer 4c. Authentiaction (if any) 5. Provide each of your ISP's with the following info.\ 5a. Your Peer IP address 5b. Your AS# 5c. Authentication (if any, not reccomended) 5d. The Subnets you will be advertising (Some ISP's filter the incoming advertisements. Why? Lookup "Blackhole-ing".) 6. Configure BGP on your router. (Imho, preferably cisco.) 6a. Assuming you want to do load balancing, (as best as possible) 6a1. If you have less than 32 mb of Ram, then accept only each providers default route. 6a2. If you have less than 64 mb of Ram, then accept routes from each provider with a as-path of 1 hop or less and each providers default route. 6a3. If you have more than 64mb of Ram, Accept Full routes from each provider and let the router select the shortest AS-path. Monitor your memory usage and maintain at least 12 mb free at any given time. 6b.If you have a primary and a secondary link, and want to prefer one over the other, or want more control over traffic entering and exiting, then use one of the following stratigies. 6b1. As-Prepend to cause the internet to prefer one link or the other 6b2. Set the (Cisco Specific) weight on the preferred link 6b3. Filter to accept summary routes only from one provider 6b3. Use BGP's metrics to reccomend preferences to your ISP's It Seems like a lot, but really it's not that bad. If anyone needs help with this, E-mail me off list. The ISP I work for is expiring and I will be glad to help you out. (As an advisor (free advice), or as a contractor(Price varies from negotiable to negligible.)) Thanks, Ejay Hire [EMAIL PROTECTED] 434-591-4564 ... Have router will travel! ---End Crosspost-- -Ejay Hire [EMAIL PROTECTED] 434-591-4564 -Original Message- From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could do the change automatically to the other active isp. It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each one, how to route accross the other good gateway. Thnx in advance Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36387&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ciscoworks autodiscovery [7:36386]
Hey group,
Anybody run into any problems with autodicovery form ani?
I installed the entire lan management collection, browsed to ciscoworks url,
changed the autodicovery dates/times...Then it asked me if I would like to
go ahead and perform an autodiscovery... wow...how convienant...of course I
would!... and WAHLA! uhh... nothing happened... so I thought...maybe
I'll let it sit over the weekend and run through all the different times I
had autodiscovery set up for... and low and behold still nothing!
what gives? my snmp strings are as follows
*.*.*.*:pub::priv
with pub and priv being substituted for the real deal...
any ideas? Is there some cheezy setting somewhere I am just missing?
-Patrick
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36386&t=36386
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
HSRP-Hot Standby Router Protocol would be your best bet, BGP might come into play but it require more complications and coorperations from your both upstream providers(ISPs). However with HSRP configured on both routers: Use the Config below as a guide: FOR ROUTER1 to ISP 1 (Include all DNS, default gateways and specific parameters pointing to ISP1's networt here) int serial 0 ip address n.n.n.n n.n.n.n (ISP1's serial interface IP address) interface Ethernet1 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x (inside network) standby priority 105 standby preempt standby ip x.x.x.x+z (where z can be a +ve or -ve number, just a free IP address) standby track Serial0 FOR ROUTER2 to ISP 2 (Include all DNS, default gateways and specific parameters pointing to ISP2's networt here) interface serial 0 ip address k.k.k.k k.k.k.k (ISP2's serial interface IP address) interface Ethernet1 ip address p.p.p.p p.p.p.p (Inside Network) standby priority 100 standby ip x.x.x.x+z (where z can be a +ve or -ve number, just a free IP address) NOTE: Set your inside server's gateway address to x.x.x.x+z .Router2 above will be the active router thus the router to ISP1.However if ISP one becomes unavailable, its priority will be reduced from 105 making router two to become the active router. Because of the preempt command Router1 resumes its active role whenever it become available again and router2 would then revert back to be the standy router. I guess this might help you, you can check Cisco site for more information. (http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/hsrp_bgp.html) Enjoy Godswill Oletu CSS1,CCDP,CCNP. - Original Message - From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay To: Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:10 AM Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] > Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers > and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of > one of my servers, because one isp is failure. > I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could > do the change automatically to the other active isp. > It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of > my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. > So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each > one, how to route accross the other good gateway. > > Thnx in advance > Yassl _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36388&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Run HSRP between the two cisco routers and then point your default gateway to the VIP address. Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could do the change automatically to the other active isp. It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each one, how to route accross the other good gateway. Thnx in advance Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36389&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Question [7:36352]
Hunt Lee wrote: > > I believe someone might have mentioned this already but since > I'm studying > it right now I thought I'd ask again... It would be greatly > appreciated if > someone can shed some light on this. > > For OSPF Point-to-MulitPoint Network type, does the OSPF > packets use > multicast or unicast? > > My understanding is that Point-to-Multipoint Network type is a > special > config of NBMA network in which the network are treated as a > collection of > Point-to-Point links. And since Point-to-Point links always > use multicast > (to ALLSPFRouter address 224.0.0.5), I thought Multicast will > hence use > Multicast too... however... the TCP / IP Vol1 by Jeff Doyle says > Point-to-Point links' Updates as well as Hello packets use > unicast > > Please help... > > Best Regards, > Hunt Lee > > Hunt Lee, Georg Pauwen has provided an excellent summary. I'm cutting and pasting that into a word document for quick reference in the future. If you have a couple of routers available, I would recommend turning on 'debug ip packet' 'debug ip ospf adj' 'debug ip ospf hello' and 'debug ip ospf packet' Shut and no shut a couple of interfaces here and there. Do this for all types of NMBA modes. You can see where the various traffic types are coming from and going to (e.g. hellos to 224.0.0.5 on p-t-p and p-t-mp subinterfaces), etc. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36390&t=36352 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cissps [7:36391]
Is Cissp worth getting? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36391&t=36391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Remote Access simple question [7:36213]
Was just going through the same page when this same question also struck me verdict.. typo. Look at the screen capture on the following page and you will see that the correct line numbers are reflected. ""Mark Odette II"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > If I recall correctly, you are right, the answer would be S 3/1. Perhaps > it's just a Type-O... It's not like that doesn't ever happen ;-) > > Mark > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 9:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Remote Access simple question [7:36213] > > > Q) Which interface is line 97 on a 3640? > A)Answer is S 2/1. > > The answer seems wrong to me. On a 3640, this is how lines are numbered: > > > > slot0lines 1-32 > slot133-64 > slot265-96 > slot397-128 > > So, the interface would be S 3/1 rather. > This question appears on Chapter4/Q6 in the Q&A section of cisco press > remote access cert.guide > Thank You Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36392&t=36213 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ch 7 pg 518 in ccie practical studies - Karl [7:36393]
Hi all, I am quoting here the second paragraph on Pg 518 of CCIE practical studies book "Because link-state protocols rely on the use of periodic hellos to retain neighbor adjacency snapshot routing can be used only with link-state protocols, such as IGRP and RIP for IP, RIP for IPX, and RTMP for AT " Having said link-state protocols and giving examples of distance vector protocols I am presuming a typo in this. Can anybody comment on this please? Thanks Rajesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36393&t=36393 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dialup mac address [7:36394]
hey group
I've got a 3640 with a couple'a pri's and two modem banks... I want to give
vendors access to very specific servers through a firewall... (netscreen)
My original thought was to place the vendor's mac address for it's dialup
adapter in dhcp and assign it the same ip every timethen base the ACL's
to each server on the vendor ip address...
All the searching I have done on the web say dialup adapters have generic
mac addresses, ie 44-45-53-54-00-00 ... How can I get the 3640 to dole out
specfic ip's to vendors? How do isp's keep up with leases if this is the
case?
-Patrick
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36394&t=36394
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How does repeater work? [7:36323]
I cannot agree that bridges are often described as multi-port repeaters. Actually, hubs are multi-port repeaters. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Cullimore" To: Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:34 AM Subject: Re: How does repeater work? [7:36323] > The classical repeater as described in the first couple of chapters of > nearly every networking/internetworking technologies survey is a little > before my time, but here are some thoughts: > > -bridges are often described as multi-port repeaters, leaving the impression > that mere repeaters have but a single port (please note, that the coinage > described might involve distinguishing ingress from egress ports, but that's > hardly clear to the uninitiated). I suppose that an argument might be made > to lend legitimacy to the practice of contrasting the prefix multi with > something other than a term specifically denoting "one" or "single", but I'm > not sure how relevant that will turn out to be as time erodes those cases > without corroborating evidence. > > -to the extent that the purpose of the repeater is to extend a LAN, one > might picture a device with two cables (or other data-traversing-friendly > media) attached: one connected to the original network, one connected to the > extension. I'm honestly not sure how else it would function. > > -to the extent that the characterization i've provided is accurate, it might > be useful to apply bridging concepts in order to discern the functionality > of the repeater. A bridge accepts packets on a given port and, by charter, > does NOT transmit replicas of those packets on the same (ingress) port. I > therefore picture a repeater as a device that has 2 connections: one to the > original network, one to the LAN extension. If this is the case, I would > presume that the relevant functionality is to perpetuate packets received on > one port to the other. If that is the case, the repeater cannot be said to > create a loop. Note: if a loop already exists, the repeater would perpetuate > that condition, by design. > > All: as I mentioned, repeaters ceased to be relevant before my time. If > anyone knows differently about the topics I've alluded to, please post your > dissenting statement. > > Thanks, > > > - Original Message - > From: "mlh" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 3:18 PM > Subject: How does repeater work? [7:36323] > > > > Could anybody tell me how repeaters work ? I don't understand how repeater > > can regenerate > > the two-way signals from both segment connected to the repeater. Isn't it > > forming a loop? > > Pls forgive me asking the stupid question. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > mlh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36395&t=36323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VoIP problem [7:36396]
Hi all I've a problem with a voice router I'm getting DSP timeout errors on the far end (egress) router and I was wondering if anyone has any ideas. See the text below for the error, it appears after the call is disconnected with "normal call clearing", we use E1s. A reboot will make the problem go away for a short while and we using 12.2(4)T on a 3640. The call routing is fine and I can make csim calls from the far end router to my local router and to my phone no problem, in the other direction I get DSP timeouts. Cheers Pat 10w5d: %VTSP-3-DSP_TIMEOUT: DSP timeout on event 0x6: DSP ID=0x1: DSP Disc (call mode=0) 10w5d: %VTSP-3-DSP_TIMEOUT: DSP timeout on event 0x6: DSP ID=0x1: DSP error stats (call mode=1658181684), chnl info(1, 0, 0) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36396&t=36396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164]
Yes, that does make sense. Thanx for the detailed reply. I did finally use the following: conf t int ethernet0/0 no ip access-list extended secure2 ip access-list extended secure2 deny tcp any any eq deny tcp any any eq 139 permit ip any any int ethernet0/0 ip access-group secure2 out ip access-group secure2 in exit wr Thanx again, Anil Gupte - Original Message - From: "Tom Petzold" To: "Anil Gupte" ; Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 11:35 AM Subject: RE: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164] > Remember the model OSI model. IP can have multiple higher level protocols > running over it. So IP uses protocol numbers to identify the higher level > protocol that it should send the data to. If you do a deny ? on a router > you will see all the different protocols (eigrp, gre, icmp, ospf, pim, tcp, > udp). Once the IP layer passes the packet up to the transport layer the > layer 4 protocol has to know which application to send the data to. So the > TCP protocol will send traffic on port 80 to the web server and traffic to > port 25 to the smtp server. > > Layer 7 - Application > Layer 6 - Presentation > Layer 5 - Session > Layer 4 - Transport Layer 3 - NetworkLayer 2 - Datalink Layer 1 - Physical > > The first line will not work. IP is the layer 3 protocol, tcp, udp, icmp, > etc are layer 4 protocols. So while tcp and udp have port numbers, ip > doesn't. If I want to deny http traffic I must deny tcp port 80 because > http uses TCP port 80. The same holds true for UDP. If I wanted to deny > snmp traffic I would deny UDP port 161. > > If you set the last line to "permit tcp any any" it would allow any tcp > based traffic but because there is a specific deny all at the end of all > access-lists, you would deny udp, icmp, eigrp, ospf, etc. The permit ip any > any says allow all layer 4 ip protocols. > > Does this make sense? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Anil Gupte > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164] > > > Actually my question was not clear, I think. My confusion is with the IP > vs. TCP. In other words should it not be somthing like: > > deny ip any any eq 139 > permit ip any any > > Why deny TCP and permit IP as opposed to deny IP and permit IP? > > Also, the purpose of these is that I am trying to block some suspicious > activity on those ports (I think someone may be running an illegal IRC > server on that port). > > Thanx for the reply (and the kid gloves). :-) > Anil Gupte > > - Original Message - > From: "Scott Nawalaniec" > To: "'Anil Gupte'" ; > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 10:17 PM > Subject: RE: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164] > > > > Hi Anil, > > > > Sometimes its scaring posting to this group. =) > > > > To answer your question, > > if you don't the permit IP any any command, there is an implicit deny rule > > at the end of an access-list, which will drop all traffic that you have > not > > allowed through the access-list. > > > > The other two deny statements are dropping netbios port 139 and something > > that uses port . > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > Scott > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Anil Gupte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:59 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164] > > > > > > Hi All! > > > > I watch this list occassionally (when I have time). This is my first post > > to this list, so be kind. :p) > > > > In the access list below: > > ** > > conf t > > int ethernet0/0 > > no ip access-list extended secure2 > > ip access-list extended secure2 > > deny tcp any any eq > > deny tcp any any eq 139 > > permit ip any any > > > > int ethernet0/0 > > ip access-group secure2 out > > ip access-group secure2 in > > > > exit > > wr > > ** > > Why is it that you need to deny TCP and permit IP? Or did I not do this > > right? > > > > Thanx, > > Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36397&t=36164 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft IAS & Cisco Router Authentication [7:36398]
Can anyone point me in the correct direction or send me to a web page that has information on Microsoft IAS and Cisco routers? I searched the Cisco site and the only thing I can find is IAS authenticating VPN devices. I am trying to setup router authentication using Microsoft IAS (RADIUS) so I don't need to keep two user databases. When I setup IAS I get a username: and password: prompt, but it never authenticates anyone. I have setup TACACS+ servers with my lab in the past and did not have any problems. Any help would be appreciated.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36398&t=36398 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aironet 350 WAP Load Balancing [7:36399]
Hi, Quick question. If I have two Aironet 350 WAP in range of each other, do they automatically load balance? Any configuration needed. The release notes seems to imply that this is done automatically thks YK Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36399&t=36399 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gateway/Network Address confusion [7:36400]
Trying to apply what I am learning in the CCNA class, I am running into some confusion regarding some basic concepts. I am trying to apply what I learned to our network which has a few colocated customers to whom I want to assign ips with subnets. We have a /23 assigned to us, let us call it 63.142.136.0/23. We have broken it up into (assigned on our router's etherne port): Internet address is 63.142.136.1/24 Secondary address 63.142.137.1/24 Also, "show ip route static" shows (among other things): S 63.142.136.0/23 is directly connected, Null0 S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 66.100.223.193 Now here is where my confusion begins. I want to assign a subnet to a customer, let us say 63.142.136.32/27 which will be 32 - 63 with 32 being the network address and 63 being the broadcast. I will then add ip route 63.142.136.32 255.255.255.224 On his Windows server, do I assign 63.142.136.33 as the default gateway? and now do I need to add a route to route his subnet to 63.142.136.1? Am I confused about the Gateway vs. network address? If I could understand this, I think I would understand everything about routing. :-) Well maybe not, but I sure would feel better about it... Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36400&t=36400 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cissps [7:36391]
Though it is a paper and ink certification, it seems to be the Security certification most recruiters know off. If you can't beat them join them. I have not seem any recruiter naming CSS1 or stuff like that, though that might be because it is relatively new, however they do not even give the CCNP+Security specialist good exposure. Many also consider the CISSP as the security equavilant of CCIE, I really do not seem the similarities or where both of them have a tie. Enjoy. Godswill Oletu - Original Message - From: Chris Sweeting To: Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:52 AM Subject: Cissps [7:36391] > Is Cissp worth getting? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36401&t=36391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Point-to-Multipoint Non-Broadcast command [7:36402]
Hello, As I understand it, Frame-Relay is a NBMA technology. Why isn't it necessary to specify the non-broadcast command when configuring ip ospf network point-to-multipoint ? And for that matter, why does ip ospf network broadcast work with FR? This seems like an answer I should know... Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written - Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36402&t=36402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344]
Exactly!! No wonder I was thinking how I could have missed it... :-( Bruce, what's up with this? Any plans for this coming Saturday... >From: "Kevin Wigle" >Reply-To: "Kevin Wigle" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344] >Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:14:27 -0500 > >guess you didn't want a big turn out since I see it says sent >Sunday, 24 Feb > > >- Original Message - >From: "Bruce Evry" >To: >Sent: Sunday, 24 February, 2002 10:57 >Subject: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344] > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > After taking the month of January off, we are going to hold the > > next meeting/luncheon of the Washington DC group this coming Saturday. > > > > Saturday, February 23, 2002 > > Time 10 am to 4 pm > > Place - Bruce's House with newly rebuilt Garage! > > 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, MD 20744 > > > > Please bring Laptops, Snacks, Sodas, Desserts and of course > > Routers and Switches. > > > > This session we will be doing OSPF and IGRP redistribution the > > hard way. Figure it's about time we kill this thing and nail down the >lid > > to its coffin... :) > > > > Speaking of learning Cisco stuff, I want to thank all of you who > > sent such nice replies to my question about affordable training. > > > > I would like to offer interested folks the chance to come visit us > > here at my house for a week and to do total-immersion Cisco Study. This > > will be geared toward the CCIE Practical Lab. > > > > Monday will be about designing your very own lab. Then on Tuesday > > through Friday you get to build your lab! (and try others as well) > > > > Topics covered will include Ethernet, Token Ring, Frame Relay, ISDN, >ATM, > > Voice, along with all our favorite routing protocols, RIP, IGRP, EIGRP, > > OSPF, and BGP. Bonus extras include NAT, PAT, HSRP, HTTP, NTP, SMTP, >and > > FOOD! > > > > This offer includes room and board for those of you who are out of > > town. Please contact me for details and pricing. (it'll be reasonable!) > > > > Home Phone 301-292-5231 > > Cell Phone 202-262-5324 > > E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36403&t=36344 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ch 7 pg 518 in ccie practical studies - Karl [7:36393]
Should be "snapshot routing can be used only with distance vector protocols, such as IGRP and RIP." ""Rajesh Kumar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > I am quoting here the second paragraph on Pg 518 of CCIE practical > studies book > > > "Because link-state protocols rely on the use of periodic hellos to > retain neighbor adjacency snapshot routing can be used only with > link-state protocols, such as IGRP and RIP for IP, RIP for IPX, and RTMP > for AT " > > > Having said link-state protocols and giving examples of distance vector > protocols I am presuming a typo in this. > > Can anybody comment on this please? > > Thanks > Rajesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36404&t=36393 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Come on guys, Think about it for a minute. Do you really think the router is failing, or is his downtime caused by the wan link? HSRP won't significantly increase your uptime if the wan link is failing and he has to manually change his server's IP/default gateway to switch to the other link. A diferent way to think of it... If you had a car with no brakes and a broken tail-light, which would you fix first? -Ejay -Original Message- From: Ladrach, Daniel E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Run HSRP between the two cisco routers and then point your default gateway to the VIP address. Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could do the change automatically to the other active isp. It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each one, how to route accross the other good gateway. Thnx in advance Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36406&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Do not say that a 2500 will not work for BGP. It will work just fine for a
default-only or partial-routes setup, and I'm sure more than one member of
this group has set it up.
-ejay
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
chances are bgp will not be availablefirst..he has to have the address
space...second...if he didn't plan for it before hand, he's probably got a
couple'a 2500's or 2600's Try running bgp on a 2500. (unless of
course he uses the same isp for both connections and they work with him on
setting up redundancy) But at that point he still would not have his own
asn for bgp...
-Patrick
>>> "sam sneed" 02/25/02 10:46AM >>>
You would want to use both HSRP and BGP in this case. HSRP will solve the
problem of changing the default gateway on the clients when a link fails.
BGP will be used for fault tolerance at the ISP side. Here is a sample doc I
got form the cisco site:
http://www.v-man.net/support/pdf/hsrp_bgp.pdf
""Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco
routers
> and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of
> one of my servers, because one isp is failure.
> I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i
could
> do the change automatically to the other active isp.
> It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one
of
> my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server.
> So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp
each
> one, how to route accross the other good gateway.
>
> Thnx in advance
> Yassl
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36407&t=36371
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dialup mac address [7:36394]
You can assign them a specific IP and/or privledges based on username using
radius.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dialup mac address [7:36394]
hey group
I've got a 3640 with a couple'a pri's and two modem banks... I want to give
vendors access to very specific servers through a firewall... (netscreen)
My original thought was to place the vendor's mac address for it's dialup
adapter in dhcp and assign it the same ip every timethen base the ACL's
to each server on the vendor ip address...
All the searching I have done on the web say dialup adapters have generic
mac addresses, ie 44-45-53-54-00-00 ... How can I get the 3640 to dole out
specfic ip's to vendors? How do isp's keep up with leases if this is the
case?
-Patrick
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36408&t=36394
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Point-to-Multipoint Non-Broadcast command [7:36402]
Tim, The default network type is NBMA for NBMA-type interfaces (e.g. frame relay) and also for p-t-mp subinterfaces. As for broadcast, this implies a fully meshed environment, which is *logically* equivelant to a broadcast environment such as ethernet - assuming of course that information is duplicated to every recipient). Remember that a DR and BDR are elected in this type of environment just like ethernet. I have to look this stuff up every couple of months because it is pretty confusing. The terminology isn't exactly intuitive. Scott Tim Booth wrote: > > Hello, > > As I understand it, Frame-Relay is a NBMA technology. Why > isn't it > necessary to specify the non-broadcast command when configuring > ip ospf > network point-to-multipoint ? And for that > matter, why > does ip ospf network broadcast work with FR? This seems like an > answer I > should know... > > Kind Regards, > Tim Booth > MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written > - > Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little > temporary > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. > Benjamin Franklin, 1759 > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36409&t=36402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]
That's for damn sure. ""adam lee"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Here in the Bay Area you might be unemployed for a long time no matter what > cert you have. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > nrf > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 3:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well in the good old days of the economy, I made more than that even > before > > becoming a CCNA. I would never settle for 50k, even in this econ., > > If you're just a CCNA and you won't settle for 50k now, well then you might > be out of work for some time - a very very long time. > > > > especially as a CCIE. Plus, a CCIE IMO should already have exp., and lots > > of it. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of becoming a CCIE - cisco > > certified internet EXPERT! > > > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > A CCNA with little or no experience? Hardly. He's lucky to even land a > job > > > right now. I think this intern program is aimed at people new to the > > field. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:50 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > A CCNA makes more than 50k. And you wouldn't have to pay your company > to > > > work for them and get training. Most companies pay you and pay for your > > > training. > > > > > > -- > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > I've taken some classes at ICTP. From what I gather, their CCIE intern > > > > program works like this: you sign up for their CCIE program (which is > > not > > > > cheap I should add) and when you pass your CCIE written/lab (I vaguely > > > > remember that the CCIE written pass is all you need), you can work as > a > > > > subcontractor for ICTP. You make substantially less money than a > CCIE > > is > > > > "worth", (I believe around $50,000, don't quote me on that) but for > > those > > > > with little or no experience (i.e., people enrolling in this program), > > it > > > > works out really well. Hopefully Mr. Lee could explain the program > more > > in > > > > detail. > > > > > > > > - Sean > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:34 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps its a new look on recruiting, they train u, get a slice of the > > > > dough for awhile?? Just speculating of course.. > > > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Cisco Nuts wrote: > > > > > > > > > And upon finishing the program, how many years of slavery will we > > > > > unfortunate ones be indebted to your gracious company? :-) > > > > > Can you clarify this?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Jason Lee" > > > > > >Reply-To: "Jason Lee" > > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >Subject: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > >Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:40:20 -0500 > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > >My name is Jason Lee I currently work for ICTP located in anaheim > > > > > >california > > > > > >we are currently looking for few candidates to go through our very > > > > intense > > > > > >cisco training, also to note that upon finishing the program CEA > > (cisco > > > > > >expert academy)you can be eligible for an internship... we have > > > > information > > > > > >session going on every other friday, so if this sounds interesting > to > > > > you, > > > > > >or if you need a lab to study for the ccie or ccnp please give me a > > > call. > > > > > > > > > > > >Jason Lee > > > > > >IT specialist > > > > > >714-783-1083 > > > > > >www.ICTP.com > > > > > _ > > > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > > > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36410&t=36091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF - Type 4 [7:36358]
By cisco default type 3 and 4 are flooded into the stub area If you configure the area as stub no-summary, then the summary routes are not flooded into the stub. The stub only needs to know its internal area routes, and can access everything else via the default route 0.0.0.0. The type 4 LSA advertises all ASBRs into other areas (unless the ASBR exists in the area being flooded). They point to the Router ID of the ASBR(s). -Original Message- From: Venkataramanaiah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 10:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF - Type 4 [7:36358] Hi all, I was wondering what is the use of type 4 LSA when the reachability to ASBR is possible using the Type 3 LSA information. Also I would like to know whether Type 4 is flooded into a Stub area. Can someone clarify. Regards -Venkat __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36411&t=36358 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VoIP problem [7:36396]
Pat- Question: Are both ends identical in Hardware and/or Software?? More importantly, Are both routers running the same version of IOS? I've seen something very similar to this, and it wound up being a compound problem of buggy version of IOS and a mixture of versions from end to end. If you can, you might think about rolling back a little on the version of IOS, to say, 12.2.1, or something like that but verify it won't break some other feature you're depending on first. Another wise action would be to go onto CCO and check their BugTraq to see if they have any known issues with 12.2.4T. Also, here's a tool that might help with the error message: Error message Decoder Ring! It requires CCO access. http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Errordecoder/home.pl Hope this helps! Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Donlon Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VoIP problem [7:36396] Hi all I've a problem with a voice router I'm getting DSP timeout errors on the far end (egress) router and I was wondering if anyone has any ideas. See the text below for the error, it appears after the call is disconnected with "normal call clearing", we use E1s. A reboot will make the problem go away for a short while and we using 12.2(4)T on a 3640. The call routing is fine and I can make csim calls from the far end router to my local router and to my phone no problem, in the other direction I get DSP timeouts. Cheers Pat 10w5d: %VTSP-3-DSP_TIMEOUT: DSP timeout on event 0x6: DSP ID=0x1: DSP Disc (call mode=0) 10w5d: %VTSP-3-DSP_TIMEOUT: DSP timeout on event 0x6: DSP ID=0x1: DSP error stats (call mode=1658181684), chnl info(1, 0, 0) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36405&t=36396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fiber optic interface question [7:36366]
I am not completely sure, but I do not believe these two cards will interoperate. The PA-POS is a packet-over-Sonet module. Thus that box will look to frame the layer 2 frames as POS frames - and it will use the entire OC-3 for the one POS connection. The PA-A3 is an ATM module. It is looking to fill it with ATM 53-byte ATM cells, and it is expecting to divide the OC-3 bandwidth between whatever SVCs or PVCs have been created. Just my thoughts - Rob. ""Alejandro Acosta"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > I am about to purchase a Fiber Optic Interface; because this kind of > cards are pretty expensive I prefer to ask you in order do not buy the wrong > interface. > Can I connect this two cards: PA-POS-OC3SMI and PA-A3-OC3SMI?. We are > going to use single mode fiber and it is Mid Range. > > Thanks in advanced. > > Alejandro Acosta Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36412&t=36366 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]
Well, I agree. But the only thing I can do is try to remain optimistic. I relocated to the Bay area just prior to 9/11, the market wasn't great to begin with but just got worse...*hopefully* with no more major catastrophes, consumer confidence and spending will grow... As far as certs go, I am holding off getting some certs until I get the required experience to back it up. I am gauging it as I go. It takes more discipline this way but will be more rewarding in the long run and I will be stronger for it I believe. - Original Message - From: "adam lee" To: Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 10:58 PM Subject: RE: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > Here in the Bay Area you might be unemployed for a long time no matter what > cert you have. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > nrf > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 3:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well in the good old days of the economy, I made more than that even > before > > becoming a CCNA. I would never settle for 50k, even in this econ., > > If you're just a CCNA and you won't settle for 50k now, well then you might > be out of work for some time - a very very long time. > > > > especially as a CCIE. Plus, a CCIE IMO should already have exp., and lots > > of it. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of becoming a CCIE - cisco > > certified internet EXPERT! > > > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > A CCNA with little or no experience? Hardly. He's lucky to even land a > job > > > right now. I think this intern program is aimed at people new to the > > field. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:50 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > A CCNA makes more than 50k. And you wouldn't have to pay your company > to > > > work for them and get training. Most companies pay you and pay for your > > > training. > > > > > > -- > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > I've taken some classes at ICTP. From what I gather, their CCIE intern > > > > program works like this: you sign up for their CCIE program (which is > > not > > > > cheap I should add) and when you pass your CCIE written/lab (I vaguely > > > > remember that the CCIE written pass is all you need), you can work as > a > > > > subcontractor for ICTP. You make substantially less money than a > CCIE > > is > > > > "worth", (I believe around $50,000, don't quote me on that) but for > > those > > > > with little or no experience (i.e., people enrolling in this program), > > it > > > > works out really well. Hopefully Mr. Lee could explain the program > more > > in > > > > detail. > > > > > > > > - Sean > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:34 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps its a new look on recruiting, they train u, get a slice of the > > > > dough for awhile?? Just speculating of course.. > > > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Cisco Nuts wrote: > > > > > > > > > And upon finishing the program, how many years of slavery will we > > > > > unfortunate ones be indebted to your gracious company? :-) > > > > > Can you clarify this?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Jason Lee" > > > > > >Reply-To: "Jason Lee" > > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >Subject: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > >Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:40:20 -0500 > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > >My name is Jason Lee I currently work for ICTP located in anaheim > > > > > >california > > > > > >we are currently looking for few candidates to go through our very > > > > intense > > > > > >cisco training, also to note that upon finishing the program CEA > > (cisco > > > > > >expert academy)you can be eligible for an internship... we have > > > > information > > > > > >session going on every other friday, so if this sounds interesting > to > > > > you, > > > > > >or if you need a lab to study for the ccie or ccnp please give me a > > > call. > > > > > > > > > > > >Jason Lee > > > > > >IT specialist > > > > > >714-783-1083 > > > > > >www.ICTP.com > > > > > _ > > > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > > > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36413&t=36091
Re: dialup mac address [7:36394]
Hello,
Without using any AAA server, you nac assign specific IP address by using
dialer pool .
Mohannad Khuffash
PalTel
""Patrick Ramsey"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> hey group
>
> I've got a 3640 with a couple'a pri's and two modem banks... I want to
give
> vendors access to very specific servers through a firewall... (netscreen)
> My original thought was to place the vendor's mac address for it's dialup
> adapter in dhcp and assign it the same ip every timethen base the
ACL's
> to each server on the vendor ip address...
>
> All the searching I have done on the web say dialup adapters have generic
> mac addresses, ie 44-45-53-54-00-00 ... How can I get the 3640 to dole out
> specfic ip's to vendors? How do isp's keep up with leases if this is the
> case?
>
> -Patrick
>
>
> > Confidentiality DisclaimerThis email and any files
transmitted with it may contain confidential and
> /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
> Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to
whom
> addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
> privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
> copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
> subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
> email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete
this
> email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36415&t=36394
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please help me answer this question [7:36295]
I think Answer C mentions just one site, not multiple sites. It could be done on a single router with a simple ACL that doesn't allow access to the host that has the software. So, C is right. How would you do Answer A with a simple firewall system? If you can answer that, then I'll agree with you that A is right, but I bet you can't come up with a simple solution to the problem that needs to be solved in A. And how about Answer B and D? What are your solutions to those problems? And are your solutions simple? This is the sort of thinking that you need for CID. And it is real-world, by the way. Let's say that the people who will be implementing and maintaining the security system are just barely out of school or just recently got their CCNA. There are no software developers or senior network engineers to get the system working. A design requirement and priority in this case is simplicity. Of course, "simplicity" is somewhat subjective, and that is a legitimate complaint about the question. But it's all relative. If test takers actually do the work required to envision actual solutions, they can easily determine which one is simplest. If test takers try to memorize answers or determine answers without much analysis, not only will they find the test frustrating and possibly unpassable, they will suck as network designers, (to be blunt! ;-) Priscilla At 06:24 PM 2/23/02, Russ Kreigh wrote: >I think A would be right, because C would not be a "simple" solution, ex. >they would have to maintain a list of unauthorized sites. > > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Love Cisco >Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:16 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Please help me answer this question [7:36295] > > >1. Which of the following customers can probably meet their security >requirements with a simple firewall system? >A. Company ABC wants to make sure customers can see public marketing data >but not proprietary sales figures. >B. University ABC want to make sure students can see but not change their >grades in administrative database. >C. Company XYZ wants to make sure employees do not download software from >unauthorized site. >D. University XYZ wants to make sure that public central software developed >at the university stops working after a period of time if the user does not >pay shareware fees. >= >I think C is right. But some people think A. > >What do you think? Why? Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36414&t=36295 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dialup mac address [7:36394]
Can I assume secure ACS does this?
>>> "Hire, Ejay" 02/25/02 01:24PM >>>
You can assign them a specific IP and/or privledges based on username using
radius.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dialup mac address [7:36394]
hey group
I've got a 3640 with a couple'a pri's and two modem banks... I want to give
vendors access to very specific servers through a firewall... (netscreen)
My original thought was to place the vendor's mac address for it's dialup
adapter in dhcp and assign it the same ip every timethen base the ACL's
to each server on the vendor ip address...
All the searching I have done on the web say dialup adapters have generic
mac addresses, ie 44-45-53-54-00-00 ... How can I get the 3640 to dole out
specfic ip's to vendors? How do isp's keep up with leases if this is the
case?
-Patrick
> Confidentiality Disclaimer Confidentiality
Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36416&t=36394
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
2500 is BGP king
-Original Message-
From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Do not say that a 2500 will not work for BGP. It will work just fine for a
default-only or partial-routes setup, and I'm sure more than one member of
this group has set it up.
-ejay
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
chances are bgp will not be availablefirst..he has to have the address
space...second...if he didn't plan for it before hand, he's probably got a
couple'a 2500's or 2600's Try running bgp on a 2500. (unless of
course he uses the same isp for both connections and they work with him on
setting up redundancy) But at that point he still would not have his own
asn for bgp...
-Patrick
>>> "sam sneed" 02/25/02 10:46AM >>>
You would want to use both HSRP and BGP in this case. HSRP will solve the
problem of changing the default gateway on the clients when a link fails.
BGP will be used for fault tolerance at the ISP side. Here is a sample doc I
got form the cisco site:
http://www.v-man.net/support/pdf/hsrp_bgp.pdf
""Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco
routers
> and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of
> one of my servers, because one isp is failure.
> I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i
could
> do the change automatically to the other active isp.
> It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one
of
> my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server.
> So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp
each
> one, how to route accross the other good gateway.
>
> Thnx in advance
> Yassl
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36417&t=36371
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CVPN 3005 and Movian [7:36419]
I have setup my concentrator and movian software as it is on cisco's website. When I try and login I get the error 'Duplicate first packet detected!'. The only thing I can think of is that I'm inside my network and am trying to access the concentrator on my DMZ. The regular Cisco client works ok doing this, so I would think that this client would too? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36419&t=36419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How does repeater work? [7:36323]
If you really read somewhere that a bridge is a multi-port repeater, trash that reference. ;-) Bridges (switches) solve different problems than repeaters (hubs). The original repeaters had just two ports (in and out). These repeaters were implemented to allow one to get around the limitation that a single coaxial-based Ethernet segment could be only 500 meters (10Base5 or Thick Ethernet) or 185 meters (10Base2 or Thin Ethernet). With a repeater you could connect a 500 meter segment to another 500 meter segment and not have a problem. The repeater amplified the signal so that the signal on one side propagated to the other side. The repeater repeated all bits. It didn't understand frames and worked with signals and bits. Then the engineers figured out that these repeaters could connect more than just two segments, and along came the multiport repeater. The multiport repeater evolved into a HUB. A bridge works at the next layer up. A bridge divides up collision domains and solves the over-utilization problem. Although it also solves distance restrictions, that's not its main intent. A bridge understands frames and hence can offer many features. The bridge evolved into a SWITCH. Priscilla At 05:34 AM 2/25/02, Kevin Cullimore wrote: >The classical repeater as described in the first couple of chapters of >nearly every networking/internetworking technologies survey is a little >before my time, but here are some thoughts: > >-bridges are often described as multi-port repeaters, leaving the impression >that mere repeaters have but a single port (please note, that the coinage >described might involve distinguishing ingress from egress ports, but that's >hardly clear to the uninitiated). I suppose that an argument might be made >to lend legitimacy to the practice of contrasting the prefix multi with >something other than a term specifically denoting "one" or "single", but I'm >not sure how relevant that will turn out to be as time erodes those cases >without corroborating evidence. > >-to the extent that the purpose of the repeater is to extend a LAN, one >might picture a device with two cables (or other data-traversing-friendly >media) attached: one connected to the original network, one connected to the >extension. I'm honestly not sure how else it would function. > >-to the extent that the characterization i've provided is accurate, it might >be useful to apply bridging concepts in order to discern the functionality >of the repeater. A bridge accepts packets on a given port and, by charter, >does NOT transmit replicas of those packets on the same (ingress) port. I >therefore picture a repeater as a device that has 2 connections: one to the >original network, one to the LAN extension. If this is the case, I would >presume that the relevant functionality is to perpetuate packets received on >one port to the other. If that is the case, the repeater cannot be said to >create a loop. Note: if a loop already exists, the repeater would perpetuate >that condition, by design. > >All: as I mentioned, repeaters ceased to be relevant before my time. If >anyone knows differently about the topics I've alluded to, please post your >dissenting statement. > >Thanks, > > >- Original Message - >From: "mlh" >To: >Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 3:18 PM >Subject: How does repeater work? [7:36323] > > > > Could anybody tell me how repeaters work ? I don't understand how repeater > > can regenerate > > the two-way signals from both segment connected to the repeater. Isn't it > > forming a loop? > > Pls forgive me asking the stupid question. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > mlh Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36420&t=36323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gateway/Network Address confusion [7:36400]
OK, some terminology. We've got physical networks. They are bound by routers. Anytime a packet goes through a router, it is moving from one physical network to another. Then you have a logical subnet. This is what actually gets addressed. It is possible to have multiple logical subnets on one physical network, although not recommended. Each device can only directly communicate with other members of the same logical subnet. A router would have to "translate" between the two logical subnets. Now, in the scenario you described, you have two logical subnets on one physical network (that's what the secondary address does). Also, the two logical subnets consume all your address space. You mentioned partitioning off subnets for customers. Does this mean each customer gets a seperate physical network? And do you need to provision networks for WAN links? Here would be one way to do it. Take the .137.X network off the main router (Call it R1). Get a second router (R2) for this customer. Setup a point-to-point connection between the two. Now, R1-E0 has an address of 63.142.136.1/24. Assign R1-S0 to 63.142.137.1/30 and R2-S0 to 63.142.137.2/30. This is the WAN connection. Then on R2-E0, assign address 63.142.137.33/27. The default gateway for the hosts on this network would be 63.142.137.33 and the broadcast would be 63.142.137.63. And on a correct built network, the hosts (servers) never need to have route add commands. Now if you are doing this all on one router, you just need to add a secondary address of 63.142.137.33/27 (this would require you take off the 63.142.137.1/24 address first). This creates a logical subnet on your existing physical network. I hope this made some sense to you. If you have questions, I'll be lurking around here somewhere. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36421&t=36400 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Come on Track the Serial interface! Basic HSRP! Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:20 PM To: 'Ladrach, Daniel E.'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Come on guys, Think about it for a minute. Do you really think the router is failing, or is his downtime caused by the wan link? HSRP won't significantly increase your uptime if the wan link is failing and he has to manually change his server's IP/default gateway to switch to the other link. A diferent way to think of it... If you had a car with no brakes and a broken tail-light, which would you fix first? -Ejay -Original Message- From: Ladrach, Daniel E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Run HSRP between the two cisco routers and then point your default gateway to the VIP address. Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could do the change automatically to the other active isp. It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each one, how to route accross the other good gateway. Thnx in advance Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36422&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serial interface problem [7:36423]
Hello all: I have two Cisco 4000-M routers in my home lab with two serial ports on each. S0 on Router 1 is connected to S0 on Router 2. S1 on Router 1 is connected to S1 on Router 2. The problem is that the S1 to S1 link comes up and stays up. The S0 to S0 link comes up but goes down in a few seconds. It keeps going up and down in this way repeatedly. Could someone please shed some light? The routers are connected using DCE to DTE cross connect cables. The DCE ends of both connections are on Router 2 and it providing clocking at 56000 bits per second. Encapsulation is HDLC although I have tried PPP with the same problem. I have also tried changing the default keepalive settings on both end on the S0 to SO link. The IOS is 12.1(12) on both. I have tried 12.1(10) with the same results. I have also tried changing the end where the clocking is provided with no success. I have switched cables and serial interface modules but the problem remains. Config on Router 1: interface Serial0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial1 ip address 2.2.2.1 255.255.255.0 ! Log entries on Router 1: Feb 25 17:59:41: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to up Feb 25 18:00:01: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to down Feb 25 18:00:11: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to up Feb 25 18:00:31: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to down SH IP INTERFACE BRIEF on Router 1: Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Serial01.1.1.1 YES NVRAM up down Serial12.2.2.1 YES NVRAM up up R1#sh control serial 0 MK5 unit 0, NIM slot 1, NIM type code 7, NIM version 1 idb = 0x619DACBC, driver structure at 0x619E10C0, regaddr = 0x3C100300 IB at 0x400FB1CC: mode=0x0108, local_addr=0, remote_addr=0 N1=1524, N2=1, scaler=100, T1=1000, T3=2000, TP=1 buffer size 1524 DTE V.35 serial cable attached DEBUG SERIAL INTERFACE on Router 1 Feb 25 18:26:31: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to down Feb 25 18:26:40: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA104 Feb 25 18:26:40: MK5(0): DCD is up. Feb 25 18:26:40: Serial0: HDLC myseq 16, mineseen 0*, yourseen 16, line up Feb 25 18:26:41: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to up Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): New serial state = 0x8104 Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): DCD is up. Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): Deasserting DTR Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): Deasserting DTR Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): Reset Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): Asserting DTR Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): Deasserting LTST Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA105 Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): DCD is up. Feb 25 18:26:50: Serial0: HDLC myseq 17, mineseen 0*, yourseen 17, line up Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA124 Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): DCD is up. Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA13C Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): DCD is down. Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA134 Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): DCD is down. Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA114 Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): DCD is down. Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA104 Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): DCD is up. Feb 25 18:27:00: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA104 Feb 25 18:27:00: MK5(0): DCD is up. Feb 25 18:27:00: MK5(0): Deasserting DTR Feb 25 18:27:00: MK5(0): Deasserting DTR Feb 25 18:27:00: MK5(0): Reset Feb 25 18:27:00: MK5(0): Asserting DTR Feb 25 18:27:00: MK5(0): Deasserting LTST Feb 25 18:27:00: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA105 Feb 25 18:27:00: MK5(0): DCD is up. Feb 25 18:27:00: Serial0: HDLC myseq 18, mineseen 0*, yourseen 18, line down Feb 25 18:27:01: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to down Config on router 2: interface Serial0 ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 clockrate 56000 ! interface Serial1 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 clockrate 56000 Log entries on Router 2: None SH IP INTERFACE BRIEF on Router 2: R2#sh ip int brief Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Serial01.1.1.2 YES NVRAM up down Serial12.2.2.2 YES NVRAM up up R2#sh controller s 0 MK5 unit 0, NIM slot 0, NIM type code 7, NIM version 1 idb = 0x44A4, driver structure at 0xABDAB8, regaddr = 0x8000300 IB at 0x6006E64: mode=0x0108, local_addr=0, remote_addr=0 N1=1524, N2=1, scaler=100, T1=1000, T3=2000, TP=1 buffer size 1524 DCE V.35 serial cable attached, clockrate 56000 DEBUG SERIAL INTERFACE on Router 2: Feb 25 18:30:25: Serial0: HDLC myseq 38, mineseen 0, yourseen 0, line down .Feb 25 18:30:26: Serial0: attempting to restart .Feb 25 18:30:26: MK5(0): Deasserting DSR .Feb 25 18:30:26: MK5(0): Deasserting DSR .Feb 25 18:30:26: MK5(0): Reset .Feb 25 18:30:26: MK5(0): Asserting DSR .Feb 25 18:30:26: MK5(0): Deasserting LTST .Feb 25 18
RE: OSPF - Type 4 [7:36358]
Type 3 LSA are advertised by all ABR. Type 4 and 5 LSA are advertised by ASBR. Type 4 is used to identify the ASBR and Type 5 is used to get information from the ASBR. Stub area blocks Type 4 and Type 5 LSA from propagating into that area. Also Type 4 and Type 5 are not allowed to propagate within the area also. This includes all redistributed segments. MS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36424&t=36358 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
I'm not sure I understand your point. Assume the following topology: [R1] [R2] || || \--/ | [HOST] The two border routers are R1 and R2 and each have a connection to an ISP. HSRP is configured to track the WAN link. The default gateway on the host is the HSRP standby ip address. If either WAN link goes down, the relevant router--because it is tracking the WAN link--will notify the other router that it is no longer eligible and the other router will take over. Why are you saying that the perceived uptime to the host would not increase using this method? As I see it, unless both links go down, the downtime would be quite minimal. Thanks, John >>> "Hire, Ejay" 2/25/02 11:24:23 AM >>> Come on guys, Think about it for a minute. Do you really think the router is failing, or is his downtime caused by the wan link? HSRP won't significantly increase your uptime if the wan link is failing and he has to manually change his server's IP/default gateway to switch to the other link. A diferent way to think of it... If you had a car with no brakes and a broken tail-light, which would you fix first? -Ejay -Original Message- From: Ladrach, Daniel E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Run HSRP between the two cisco routers and then point your default gateway to the VIP address. Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could do the change automatically to the other active isp. It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each one, how to route accross the other good gateway. Thnx in advance Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36425&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cissps [7:36391]
As someone who has achieved both certs, I'd have to voice an objection to the common myth that the CISSP is on the same level as the CCIE; it's not even close. The CISSP is well-known (it was listed in some rag as one of the top ten certs to get this year), but it is entirely theory. That in itself isn't bad; but if I were looking to hire someone for a security position, I would not hire someone who only had their CISSP; I would also be interested in something that certifies them on a particular platform (e.g. Checkpoint CCSE). I agree with Godswill's statement though "If you can't beat them, join them." I see a lot more positions requiring a CISSP cert when doing US Gov't work; but it seems to be moving more into the mainstream. I think it's kinda like the CCNA three or so years ago; not too many people had it so it was worth $$. Now that a lot of people have the CCNA, it doesn't open as many doors as it used to (and the $$ aren't there either) - it won't be too long before the CISSP is in a similar boat; then there will be some other cert that everyone has to get... You gotta love this industry :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Godswill Oletu Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cissps [7:36391] Though it is a paper and ink certification, it seems to be the Security certification most recruiters know off. If you can't beat them join them. I have not seem any recruiter naming CSS1 or stuff like that, though that might be because it is relatively new, however they do not even give the CCNP+Security specialist good exposure. Many also consider the CISSP as the security equavilant of CCIE, I really do not seem the similarities or where both of them have a tie. Enjoy. Godswill Oletu - Original Message - From: Chris Sweeting To: Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:52 AM Subject: Cissps [7:36391] > Is Cissp worth getting? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36426&t=36391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Aironet 350 WAP Load Balancing [7:36399]
Assuming the WEP configuration is the same for both access points and all clients: -Using different 2.4Ghz channels will facilitate load balancing via two different 11M channels (more bandwidth). -Using the same channel will load balance within the same 11M channel. All of this is done automatically. Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maverick Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Aironet 350 WAP Load Balancing [7:36399] Hi, Quick question. If I have two Aironet 350 WAP in range of each other, do they automatically load balance? Any configuration needed. The release notes seems to imply that this is done automatically thks YK Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36427&t=36399 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Because R1 and R2 are not connected to the same ISP, he has to change his IP address to use the other connection. (because he isn't using BGP to announce his netblock reachable through both connections). HSRP can't change his IP. I've been thinking about it, and there is a (scrapped together junkyard-wars) way to make this work. You can HSRP the two routers and have the backup router NAT the other ISP's IP to a Ip that is valid for it's connection. This is a ugly solution, and only works for SMTP incoming mail transfers from other servers. (because of DNS's MX record priority feature). Another strike against it is if one of the links fails, all of the SMTP sessions in Progress will drop, and the remote (sending) mail server will have to re-initiate. ... Isp1 - Ip Range 1.1.1.0/28 (0-15) Isp2 - Ip Range 2.2.2.0/28 (0-15) Mail server is configured for the ip of 1.1.1.2, with a default Gateway of 1.1.1.1 Both routers are a member of an HSRP group and listen on 1.1.1.1 R1 is the HSRP primary, tracks the serial link, and preempts. R2 is the HSRP backup, and preempts if r1's serial link fails. R2's ethernet interface is IP nat inside, and the t1 interface is ip nat outside. R2 has a single static nat entry that translates 1.1.1.2 to 2.2.2.2.. ip nat inside source static 1.1.1.2 2.2.2.2 The DNS records are configured as follows domain.com. MX 10 1.1.1.2 domain.com. MX 20 2.2.2.2 Now, Looking at all of the above and understanding that this doesn't fix clients trying to connect to the server with POP3 or SMTP directly from outlook or eudora... Do you think this is a good solution? ... (no) BGP is the right answer to this customers needs. Sadly, I know someone is going to look at this and start pushing it to customers as a solution. -Ejay -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] I'm not sure I understand your point. Assume the following topology: [R1] [R2] || || \--/ | [HOST] The two border routers are R1 and R2 and each have a connection to an ISP. HSRP is configured to track the WAN link. The default gateway on the host is the HSRP standby ip address. If either WAN link goes down, the relevant router--because it is tracking the WAN link--will notify the other router that it is no longer eligible and the other router will take over. Why are you saying that the perceived uptime to the host would not increase using this method? As I see it, unless both links go down, the downtime would be quite minimal. Thanks, John >>> "Hire, Ejay" 2/25/02 11:24:23 AM >>> Come on guys, Think about it for a minute. Do you really think the router is failing, or is his downtime caused by the wan link? HSRP won't significantly increase your uptime if the wan link is failing and he has to manually change his server's IP/default gateway to switch to the other link. A diferent way to think of it... If you had a car with no brakes and a broken tail-light, which would you fix first? -Ejay -Original Message- From: Ladrach, Daniel E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Run HSRP between the two cisco routers and then point your default gateway to the VIP address. Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could do the change automatically to the other active isp. It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each one, how to route accross the other good gateway. Thnx in advance Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36428&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]
I'm more than a CCNA. I was saying that back when I was a CCNA, I wouldn't have settled for less than 50K. But you did bring up the good point that in this economy a CCNA wouldn't get a job at 50K. I guess that it could be true. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""nrf"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well in the good old days of the economy, I made more than that even > before > > becoming a CCNA. I would never settle for 50k, even in this econ., > > If you're just a CCNA and you won't settle for 50k now, well then you might > be out of work for some time - a very very long time. > > > > especially as a CCIE. Plus, a CCIE IMO should already have exp., and lots > > of it. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of becoming a CCIE - cisco > > certified internet EXPERT! > > > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > A CCNA with little or no experience? Hardly. He's lucky to even land a > job > > > right now. I think this intern program is aimed at people new to the > > field. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:50 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > A CCNA makes more than 50k. And you wouldn't have to pay your company > to > > > work for them and get training. Most companies pay you and pay for your > > > training. > > > > > > -- > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > I've taken some classes at ICTP. From what I gather, their CCIE intern > > > > program works like this: you sign up for their CCIE program (which is > > not > > > > cheap I should add) and when you pass your CCIE written/lab (I vaguely > > > > remember that the CCIE written pass is all you need), you can work as > a > > > > subcontractor for ICTP. You make substantially less money than a > CCIE > > is > > > > "worth", (I believe around $50,000, don't quote me on that) but for > > those > > > > with little or no experience (i.e., people enrolling in this program), > > it > > > > works out really well. Hopefully Mr. Lee could explain the program > more > > in > > > > detail. > > > > > > > > - Sean > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:34 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps its a new look on recruiting, they train u, get a slice of the > > > > dough for awhile?? Just speculating of course.. > > > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Cisco Nuts wrote: > > > > > > > > > And upon finishing the program, how many years of slavery will we > > > > > unfortunate ones be indebted to your gracious company? :-) > > > > > Can you clarify this?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Jason Lee" > > > > > >Reply-To: "Jason Lee" > > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >Subject: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > >Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:40:20 -0500 > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > >My name is Jason Lee I currently work for ICTP located in anaheim > > > > > >california > > > > > >we are currently looking for few candidates to go through our very > > > > intense > > > > > >cisco training, also to note that upon finishing the program CEA > > (cisco > > > > > >expert academy)you can be eligible for an internship... we have > > > > information > > > > > >session going on every other friday, so if this sounds interesting > to > > > > you, > > > > > >or if you need a lab to study for the ccie or ccnp please give me a > > > call. > > > > > > > > > > > >Jason Lee > > > > > >IT specialist > > > > > >714-783-1083 > > > > > >www.ICTP.com > > > > > _ > > > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > > > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36429&t=36091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab this Fri. in RTP [7:36365]
Any last minute study suggestions. I've been through all the FatKid and CCBoot Camp labs twice. There are a couple of areas where I'm shaky which I'll be concentrating on. What should my focus be in this the last few days of studing? Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36365&t=36365 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: beta exams [7:36356]
It is interesting that Cisco is doing beta's for the CCNP track, especially when they've got such lousy exams out there like the CID 3.0 640-025. They did the beta for that one long ago but nothing ever came of it. My guess is that the CCNP question pool is such common knowledge at this time that Cisco wants to update it. You've got all these braindump companies advertising "real questions, real answers" so that practically anyone can get a CCNP these days. So, maybe new questions will weed out some of the braindump companies and prevent "everyone" from getting a CCNP! At least for a couple of months, anyway!:-) Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Ronald James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: beta exams [7:36356] don't 100% got your questions, but let me try it. beta exams are usually under this format, more questions with more time, and it will take longer to give you the exam result; so, the current production ccnp exams still as is. to me, reason of providing ccnp beta is interesting, perhaps cisco got another poll of questions, i guess. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > anybody given beta exams in here in the past? > currently the ccnp track exams are in for beta.. today being the last > day. I was gonna take them when I read that results would be out only > after 8-12 weeks. 140 questions/3 hours. these exams are of a > different format too so chance of passing is reduced i guess. $50 is > the price. > > Or is it that cisco sees to it that a certain %age of people who give > these exams pass out? If its so, then chances for somebody > well-prepared are pretty good. somebody, please guide. > thx. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36373&t=36356 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
I agree that this configuration - with HSRP and tracking - could work well for connections that are initiaed outbound. You would not necessarily need BGP. R1 could do an outbound NAT to whatever IP address space had been assigned by ISP 1. R2 could do an outbound NAT to whatever IP address space had been assigned by ISP 2. The return traffic would use the correct ISP based on that address space - without any BGP. However if you do need inbound connections - and chances are you do, BGP is the most realistic way to do it. BGP on 2500's is fine. If you are only taking the default route its probably easier on the box than running OSPF. Rob. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm not sure I understand your point. Assume the following topology: > > [R1] [R2] >|| >|| >\--/ > | > [HOST] > > The two border routers are R1 and R2 and each have a connection to an > ISP. HSRP is configured to track the WAN link. The default gateway on > the host is the HSRP standby ip address. If either WAN link goes down, > the relevant router--because it is tracking the WAN link--will notify > the other router that it is no longer eligible and the other router will > take over. > > Why are you saying that the perceived uptime to the host would not > increase using this method? As I see it, unless both links go down, the > downtime would be quite minimal. > > Thanks, > John > > >>> "Hire, Ejay" 2/25/02 11:24:23 AM >>> > Come on guys, Think about it for a minute. Do you really think the > router > is failing, or is his downtime caused by the wan link? HSRP won't > significantly increase your uptime if the wan link is failing and he > has to > manually change his server's IP/default gateway to switch to the other > link. > > A diferent way to think of it... If you had a car with no brakes and > a > broken tail-light, which would you fix first? > > -Ejay > > > -Original Message- > From: Ladrach, Daniel E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] > > > Run HSRP between the two cisco routers and then point your default > gateway > to the VIP address. > > Daniel Ladrach > CCNA, CCNP > WorldCom > > > -Original Message- > From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:11 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] > > > Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco > routers > and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway > of > one of my servers, because one isp is failure. > I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i > could > do the change automatically to the other active isp. > It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset > one of > my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. > So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp > each > one, how to route accross the other good gateway. > > Thnx in advance > Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36430&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Gotcha, I was misunderstanding your point. You do make a good point. I once considered HSRP for something like this but changed my mind for this exact reason. We then thought about buying a device from either FatPipe or Radware, but then we ended up using BGP on all of our border routers instead of on just two of them. John >>> "Hire, Ejay" 2/25/02 1:15:58 PM >>> Because R1 and R2 are not connected to the same ISP, he has to change his IP address to use the other connection. (because he isn't using BGP to announce his netblock reachable through both connections). HSRP can't change his IP. I've been thinking about it, and there is a (scrapped together junkyard-wars) way to make this work. You can HSRP the two routers and have the backup router NAT the other ISP's IP to a Ip that is valid for it's connection. This is a ugly solution, and only works for SMTP incoming mail transfers from other servers. (because of DNS's MX record priority feature). Another strike against it is if one of the links fails, all of the SMTP sessions in Progress will drop, and the remote (sending) mail server will have to re-initiate. ... Isp1 - Ip Range 1.1.1.0/28 (0-15) Isp2 - Ip Range 2.2.2.0/28 (0-15) Mail server is configured for the ip of 1.1.1.2, with a default Gateway of 1.1.1.1 Both routers are a member of an HSRP group and listen on 1.1.1.1 R1 is the HSRP primary, tracks the serial link, and preempts. R2 is the HSRP backup, and preempts if r1's serial link fails. R2's ethernet interface is IP nat inside, and the t1 interface is ip nat outside. R2 has a single static nat entry that translates 1.1.1.2 to 2.2.2.2.. ip nat inside source static 1.1.1.2 2.2.2.2 The DNS records are configured as follows domain.com. MX 10 1.1.1.2 domain.com. MX 20 2.2.2.2 Now, Looking at all of the above and understanding that this doesn't fix clients trying to connect to the server with POP3 or SMTP directly from outlook or eudora... Do you think this is a good solution? ... (no) BGP is the right answer to this customers needs. Sadly, I know someone is going to look at this and start pushing it to customers as a solution. -Ejay -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] I'm not sure I understand your point. Assume the following topology: [R1] [R2] || || \--/ | [HOST] The two border routers are R1 and R2 and each have a connection to an ISP. HSRP is configured to track the WAN link. The default gateway on the host is the HSRP standby ip address. If either WAN link goes down, the relevant router--because it is tracking the WAN link--will notify the other router that it is no longer eligible and the other router will take over. Why are you saying that the perceived uptime to the host would not increase using this method? As I see it, unless both links go down, the downtime would be quite minimal. Thanks, John >>> "Hire, Ejay" 2/25/02 11:24:23 AM >>> Come on guys, Think about it for a minute. Do you really think the router is failing, or is his downtime caused by the wan link? HSRP won't significantly increase your uptime if the wan link is failing and he has to manually change his server's IP/default gateway to switch to the other link. A diferent way to think of it... If you had a car with no brakes and a broken tail-light, which would you fix first? -Ejay -Original Message- From: Ladrach, Daniel E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Run HSRP between the two cisco routers and then point your default gateway to the VIP address. Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could do the change automatically to the other active isp. It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset one of my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp each one, how to route accross the other good gateway. Thnx in advance Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36432&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Re
standby int bri0 - Not working? [7:36433]
Hello, I have 2 routers Remote and Central connected by 56k links and also isdn bri(Lab enviroment) On Remote, I have the standby command with delay for 5 5 configed. When I shut the serial intf. on Remote, the bri does not come up. But when I shut down the corresponding serial on the Central router, the bri does come up on Remote and pings work!! Just curious as to if this only works the way it is working now or should it also work if I shut off the intf. on the Remote router. Thank you. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36433&t=36433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]
I can remember in the old days when experience was more important than certs and having certs was a plus. Ko "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > I'm more than a CCNA. I was saying that back when I was a CCNA, I wouldn't > have settled for less than 50K. But you did bring up the good point that in > this economy a CCNA wouldn't get a job at 50K. I guess that it could be > true. > > -- > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > ""nrf"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Well in the good old days of the economy, I made more than that even > > before > > > becoming a CCNA. I would never settle for 50k, even in this econ., > > > > If you're just a CCNA and you won't settle for 50k now, well then you > might > > be out of work for some time - a very very long time. > > > > > > > especially as a CCIE. Plus, a CCIE IMO should already have exp., and > lots > > > of it. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of becoming a CCIE - cisco > > > certified internet EXPERT! > > > > > > -- > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > A CCNA with little or no experience? Hardly. He's lucky to even land a > > job > > > > right now. I think this intern program is aimed at people new to the > > > field. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:50 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > > > > A CCNA makes more than 50k. And you wouldn't have to pay your company > > to > > > > work for them and get training. Most companies pay you and pay for > your > > > > training. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > I've taken some classes at ICTP. From what I gather, their CCIE > intern > > > > > program works like this: you sign up for their CCIE program (which > is > > > not > > > > > cheap I should add) and when you pass your CCIE written/lab (I > vaguely > > > > > remember that the CCIE written pass is all you need), you can work > as > > a > > > > > subcontractor for ICTP. You make substantially less money than a > > CCIE > > > is > > > > > "worth", (I believe around $50,000, don't quote me on that) but for > > > those > > > > > with little or no experience (i.e., people enrolling in this > program), > > > it > > > > > works out really well. Hopefully Mr. Lee could explain the program > > more > > > in > > > > > detail. > > > > > > > > > > - Sean > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:34 AM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps its a new look on recruiting, they train u, get a slice of > the > > > > > dough for awhile?? Just speculating of course.. > > > > > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Cisco Nuts wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > And upon finishing the program, how many years of slavery will we > > > > > > unfortunate ones be indebted to your gracious company? :-) > > > > > > Can you clarify this?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Jason Lee" > > > > > > >Reply-To: "Jason Lee" > > > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >Subject: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > >Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:40:20 -0500 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >My name is Jason Lee I currently work for ICTP located in anaheim > > > > > > >california > > > > > > >we are currently looking for few candidates to go through our > very > > > > > intense > > > > > > >cisco training, also to note that upon finishing the program CEA > > > (cisco > > > > > > >expert academy)you can be eligible for an internship... we have > > > > > information > > > > > > >session going on every other friday, so if this sounds > interesting > > to > > > > > you, > > > > > > >or if you need a lab to study for the ccie or ccnp please give me > a > > > > call. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jason Lee > > > > > > >IT specialist > > > > > > >714-783-1083 > > > > > > >www.ICTP.com > > > > > > _ > > > > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > > > > > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36434&t=36091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lab this Fri. in RTP [7:36365]
there's still time. 1) redistribution between any two routing protocols over any topology. 2) route filtering - there is more than one way 3) there is a topic that may be NDA if I say anything specific, but for which there is a specific CCNP test, and which if you read this and/or the CCIE list you see all kinds of questions, complaints, concerns. 4) there is one very important topic, but I don't want to say it directly because I believe it crosses the NDA line. It has been discussed many times here and over on the CCIE lab list. hope you have covered it. you may want to check the archives of both lists to see what kinds of things are covered. Knock 'em dead, pal! Chuck ""Richard Newman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Any last minute study suggestions. I've been through all the FatKid and > CCBoot Camp labs twice. There are a couple of areas where I'm shaky which > I'll be concentrating on. What should my focus be in this the last few days > of studing? > > Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36431&t=36365 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
This solution assumes that the subnet is routable by both providers. If this is the case, then HSRP is by far the easiest solution. CM - Original Message - From: "John Neiberger" To: Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] > I'm not sure I understand your point. Assume the following topology: > > [R1] [R2] >|| >|| >\--/ > | > [HOST] > > The two border routers are R1 and R2 and each have a connection to an > ISP. HSRP is configured to track the WAN link. The default gateway on > the host is the HSRP standby ip address. If either WAN link goes down, > the relevant router--because it is tracking the WAN link--will notify > the other router that it is no longer eligible and the other router will > take over. > > Why are you saying that the perceived uptime to the host would not > increase using this method? As I see it, unless both links go down, the > downtime would be quite minimal. > > Thanks, > John > > >>> "Hire, Ejay" 2/25/02 11:24:23 AM >>> > Come on guys, Think about it for a minute. Do you really think the > router > is failing, or is his downtime caused by the wan link? HSRP won't > significantly increase your uptime if the wan link is failing and he > has to > manually change his server's IP/default gateway to switch to the other > link. > > A diferent way to think of it... If you had a car with no brakes and > a > broken tail-light, which would you fix first? > > -Ejay > > > -Original Message- > From: Ladrach, Daniel E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] > > > Run HSRP between the two cisco routers and then point your default > gateway > to the VIP address. > > Daniel Ladrach > CCNA, CCNP > WorldCom > > > -Original Message- > From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:11 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] > > > Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco > routers > and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway > of > one of my servers, because one isp is failure. > I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i > could > do the change automatically to the other active isp. > It happening me right now. And when i have to do that i have to reset > one of > my servers.. :S. Is a costs operatrion its a mail server. > So if somebody knows how to resolve between routers with different isp > each > one, how to route accross the other good gateway. > > Thnx in advance > Yassl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36435&t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gateway/Network Address confusion [7:36400]
>OK, some terminology. We've got physical networks. They are bound by >routers. Anytime a packet goes through a router, it is moving from one >physical network to another. Then you have a logical subnet. This is what >actually gets addressed. It is possible to have multiple logical subnets on >one physical network, although not recommended. Each device can only >directly communicate with other members of the same logical subnet. A >router would have to "translate" between the two logical subnets. > >Now, in the scenario you described, you have two logical subnets on one >physical network (that's what the secondary address does). Also, the two >logical subnets consume all your address space. How many illogical subnets share the physical place where Dilbert works? :-) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36436&t=36400 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: standby int bri0 - Not working? [7:36433]
It's working 'as advertised' Nnanna PS if u issue the command 'no keepalive' on your serial interface, the bri should kick in -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Nuts Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: standby int bri0 - Not working? [7:36433] Hello, I have 2 routers Remote and Central connected by 56k links and also isdn bri(Lab enviroment) On Remote, I have the standby command with delay for 5 5 configed. When I shut the serial intf. on Remote, the bri does not come up. But when I shut down the corresponding serial on the Central router, the bri does come up on Remote and pings work!! Just curious as to if this only works the way it is working now or should it also work if I shut off the intf. on the Remote router. Thank you. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36437&t=36433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344]
Dear Kevin and Everyone Else, Afraid I got caught in a time warp, the message got posted a day after the meeting. Oh well We will try once again - This coming Saturday, March 2, 2002. Time: Noon to 4 PM. Place: Bruce's House (under construction...) 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, Maryland 20744 Howard Berkowitz may be making a special guest appearance and we may get to log into 2 remote CCIE Labs to finally answer the question of what is the WORST possible way to redistribute OSPF and IGRP! Everyone is invited. Our group is informal and there are no fees, dues, or secret handshakes to learn. All you need is an interest in Cisco. (of course bringing snacks and sodas is always encouraged!) Bring laptops and gear if you have them. If not bring yourself! Do try and let me know how many people are coming so I can get an appropriate amount of food. (my treat but donations are accepted) Yours Truly - Bruce Evry On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Kevin Wigle wrote: > guess you didn't want a big turn out since I see it says sent > Sunday, 24 Feb > > > - Original Message - > From: "Bruce Evry" > To: > Sent: Sunday, 24 February, 2002 10:57 > Subject: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344] > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > After taking the month of January off, we are going to hold the > > next meeting/luncheon of the Washington DC group this coming Saturday. > > > > Saturday, February 23, 2002 > > Time 10 am to 4 pm > > Place - Bruce's House with newly rebuilt Garage! > > 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, MD 20744 > > > > Please bring Laptops, Snacks, Sodas, Desserts and of course > > Routers and Switches. > > > > This session we will be doing OSPF and IGRP redistribution the > > hard way. Figure it's about time we kill this thing and nail down the lid > > to its coffin... :) > > > > Speaking of learning Cisco stuff, I want to thank all of you who > > sent such nice replies to my question about affordable training. > > > > I would like to offer interested folks the chance to come visit us > > here at my house for a week and to do total-immersion Cisco Study. This > > will be geared toward the CCIE Practical Lab. > > > > Monday will be about designing your very own lab. Then on Tuesday > > through Friday you get to build your lab! (and try others as well) > > > > Topics covered will include Ethernet, Token Ring, Frame Relay, ISDN, ATM, > > Voice, along with all our favorite routing protocols, RIP, IGRP, EIGRP, > > OSPF, and BGP. Bonus extras include NAT, PAT, HSRP, HTTP, NTP, SMTP, and > > FOOD! > > > > This offer includes room and board for those of you who are out of > > town. Please contact me for details and pricing. (it'll be reasonable!) > > > > Home Phone 301-292-5231 > > Cell Phone 202-262-5324 > > E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36438&t=36344 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: standby int bri0 - Not working? [7:36433]
It only works when you shutdown the link that does not have the backup interface command. If you disconnect the cable on either router then the backup link will come up. See the first paragraph of the link below. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri-back-dp.html#TS >From: "Cisco Nuts" >Reply-To: "Cisco Nuts" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: standby int bri0 - Not working? [7:36433] >Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:44:40 -0500 > >Hello, > >I have 2 routers Remote and Central connected by 56k links and also isdn >bri(Lab enviroment) > >On Remote, I have the standby command with delay for 5 5 configed. When I >shut the serial intf. on Remote, the bri does not come up. >But when I shut down the corresponding serial on the Central router, the >bri >does come up on Remote and pings work!! > >Just curious as to if this only works the way it is working now or should >it >also work if I shut off the intf. on the Remote router. > >Thank you. > > >_ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36439&t=36433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How does repeater work? [7:36323]
Sounds like an A+ or Network+ questions to me. But since you ask, check out www.howstuffworks.com They also have how a cable modem works, DSL, and even how routers work. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36441&t=36323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Serial interface problem [7:36423]
You are getting very strange results indeed, but what you're tying to do is somewhat strange too. It seems that you are tying to get two parallel serial links to work: R1 s0 - s0 R2 R1 s1 - s1 R2 Are you sure that both 4000M routers support two active serial interfaces? I would start by simplifying the tests. Does this work? R1 s0 - s0 R2 If yes, using the exact same cable, see if this works: R1 s1 - s1 R2 How about this (with the exact same cable): R1 s0 -- s1 R2 And this: R1 s1 -- s0 R2 OK, now try all these tests with the other cable. Do they fail? It sure seems like it could be a bad cable, although you said you swapped cables... Once you confirm that single links work, then try the parallel links. If they don't work, at least you have some data as to what causes the problem. My suspicion is that you'll have a problem even on a single link though. I'm suspicious of Router 2's Serial 0's receive capabilities. You say that on Router 1 you're seeing: Serial0: HDLC myseq 18, mineseen 0*, yourseen 18, line down. This indicates that Router 1 is sending keepalives (or at least thinks that it is.) But Router 1 is not seeing ACKs from Router 2. Router 1 is seeing (or at least at one point saw) 18 keepalives from Router 2. So Router 2 can transmit. Maybe Router 2 can't receive though, which would explain it's not ACKing. On Router 2, you're seeing: Serial0: HDLC myseq 42, mineseen 0, yourseen 0, line down. This indicates that Router 2 is transmitting keepalives (or at least thinks that it is). But Router 2 is not seeing ACKs or keepalives from the other side. Could Router 2's Serial 0 interface be bad (unable to receive?) A bad cable could also cause this problem. Sorry, I can't give you more advice. Please let us know what you find out. Thanks. Priscilla At 02:33 PM 2/25/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hello all: > >I have two Cisco 4000-M routers in my home lab with two serial ports on >each. S0 on Router 1 is connected to S0 on Router 2. S1 on Router 1 is >connected to S1 on Router 2. The problem is that the S1 to S1 link comes up >and stays up. The S0 to S0 link comes up but goes down in a few seconds. It >keeps going up and down in this way repeatedly. Could someone please shed >some light? > >The routers are connected using DCE to DTE cross connect cables. The DCE >ends of both connections are on Router 2 and it providing clocking at 56000 >bits per second. Encapsulation is HDLC although I have tried PPP with the >same problem. I have also tried changing the default keepalive settings on >both end on the S0 to SO link. The IOS is 12.1(12) on both. I have tried >12.1(10) with the same results. I have also tried changing the end where the >clocking is provided with no success. I have switched cables and serial >interface modules but the problem remains. > >Config on Router 1: >interface Serial0 > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 >! >interface Serial1 > ip address 2.2.2.1 255.255.255.0 >! >Log entries on Router 1: >Feb 25 17:59:41: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, >changed state to up >Feb 25 18:00:01: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, >changed state to down >Feb 25 18:00:11: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, >changed state to up >Feb 25 18:00:31: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, >changed state to down > >SH IP INTERFACE BRIEF on Router 1: >Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status >Protocol >Serial01.1.1.1 YES NVRAM up >down >Serial12.2.2.1 YES NVRAM up >up > >R1#sh control serial 0 >MK5 unit 0, NIM slot 1, NIM type code 7, NIM version 1 >idb = 0x619DACBC, driver structure at 0x619E10C0, regaddr = 0x3C100300 >IB at 0x400FB1CC: mode=0x0108, local_addr=0, remote_addr=0 >N1=1524, N2=1, scaler=100, T1=1000, T3=2000, TP=1 >buffer size 1524 >DTE V.35 serial cable attached > >DEBUG SERIAL INTERFACE on Router 1 >Feb 25 18:26:31: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, >changed state to down >Feb 25 18:26:40: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA104 >Feb 25 18:26:40: MK5(0): DCD is up. >Feb 25 18:26:40: Serial0: HDLC myseq 16, mineseen 0*, yourseen 16, line up >Feb 25 18:26:41: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, >changed state to up >Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): New serial state = 0x8104 >Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): DCD is up. >Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): Deasserting DTR >Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): Deasserting DTR >Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): Reset >Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): Asserting DTR >Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): Deasserting LTST >Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA105 >Feb 25 18:26:50: MK5(0): DCD is up. >Feb 25 18:26:50: Serial0: HDLC myseq 17, mineseen 0*, yourseen 17, line up >Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA124 >Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): DCD is up. >Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): New serial state = 0xA13C >Feb 25 18:26:56: MK5(0): DCD is down. >Feb 2
Re: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344]
If Howard is going to be at the meeting, then everyone attending must be asked the following questions to gain entrance: 1. What is your name? 2. What is your quest? 3. What is your favorite color?? :-) >>> "Bruce Evry" 2/25/02 3:51:53 PM >>> Dear Kevin and Everyone Else, Afraid I got caught in a time warp, the message got posted a day after the meeting. Oh well We will try once again - This coming Saturday, March 2, 2002. Time: Noon to 4 PM. Place: Bruce's House (under construction...) 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, Maryland 20744 Howard Berkowitz may be making a special guest appearance and we may get to log into 2 remote CCIE Labs to finally answer the question of what is the WORST possible way to redistribute OSPF and IGRP! Everyone is invited. Our group is informal and there are no fees, dues, or secret handshakes to learn. All you need is an interest in Cisco. (of course bringing snacks and sodas is always encouraged!) Bring laptops and gear if you have them. If not bring yourself! Do try and let me know how many people are coming so I can get an appropriate amount of food. (my treat but donations are accepted) Yours Truly - Bruce Evry On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Kevin Wigle wrote: > guess you didn't want a big turn out since I see it says sent > Sunday, 24 Feb > > > - Original Message - > From: "Bruce Evry" > To: > Sent: Sunday, 24 February, 2002 10:57 > Subject: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344] > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > After taking the month of January off, we are going to hold the > > next meeting/luncheon of the Washington DC group this coming Saturday. > > > > Saturday, February 23, 2002 > > Time 10 am to 4 pm > > Place - Bruce's House with newly rebuilt Garage! > > 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, MD 20744 > > > > Please bring Laptops, Snacks, Sodas, Desserts and of course > > Routers and Switches. > > > > This session we will be doing OSPF and IGRP redistribution the > > hard way. Figure it's about time we kill this thing and nail down the lid > > to its coffin... :) > > > > Speaking of learning Cisco stuff, I want to thank all of you who > > sent such nice replies to my question about affordable training. > > > > I would like to offer interested folks the chance to come visit us > > here at my house for a week and to do total-immersion Cisco Study. This > > will be geared toward the CCIE Practical Lab. > > > > Monday will be about designing your very own lab. Then on Tuesday > > through Friday you get to build your lab! (and try others as well) > > > > Topics covered will include Ethernet, Token Ring, Frame Relay, ISDN, ATM, > > Voice, along with all our favorite routing protocols, RIP, IGRP, EIGRP, > > OSPF, and BGP. Bonus extras include NAT, PAT, HSRP, HTTP, NTP, SMTP, and > > FOOD! > > > > This offer includes room and board for those of you who are out of > > town. Please contact me for details and pricing. (it'll be reasonable!) > > > > Home Phone 301-292-5231 > > Cell Phone 202-262-5324 > > E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36443&t=36344 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How does repeater work? [7:36323]
My late-night-not-enough-sleep mistake. Sorry. Thanks to you and others for pointing out the inaccuracies. It's still confusing to contrast repeater with the prefix multi. - Original Message - From: "mlh" To: Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:32 PM Subject: Re: How does repeater work? [7:36323] > I cannot agree that bridges are often described as multi-port repeaters. > Actually, hubs are multi-port repeaters. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Kevin Cullimore" > To: > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:34 AM > Subject: Re: How does repeater work? [7:36323] > > > > The classical repeater as described in the first couple of chapters of > > nearly every networking/internetworking technologies survey is a little > > before my time, but here are some thoughts: > > > > -bridges are often described as multi-port repeaters, leaving the > impression > > that mere repeaters have but a single port (please note, that the coinage > > described might involve distinguishing ingress from egress ports, but > that's > > hardly clear to the uninitiated). I suppose that an argument might be made > > to lend legitimacy to the practice of contrasting the prefix multi with > > something other than a term specifically denoting "one" or "single", but > I'm > > not sure how relevant that will turn out to be as time erodes those cases > > without corroborating evidence. > > > > -to the extent that the purpose of the repeater is to extend a LAN, one > > might picture a device with two cables (or other data-traversing-friendly > > media) attached: one connected to the original network, one connected to > the > > extension. I'm honestly not sure how else it would function. > > > > -to the extent that the characterization i've provided is accurate, it > might > > be useful to apply bridging concepts in order to discern the functionality > > of the repeater. A bridge accepts packets on a given port and, by charter, > > does NOT transmit replicas of those packets on the same (ingress) port. I > > therefore picture a repeater as a device that has 2 connections: one to > the > > original network, one to the LAN extension. If this is the case, I would > > presume that the relevant functionality is to perpetuate packets received > on > > one port to the other. If that is the case, the repeater cannot be said to > > create a loop. Note: if a loop already exists, the repeater would > perpetuate > > that condition, by design. > > > > All: as I mentioned, repeaters ceased to be relevant before my time. If > > anyone knows differently about the topics I've alluded to, please post > your > > dissenting statement. > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "mlh" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 3:18 PM > > Subject: How does repeater work? [7:36323] > > > > > > > Could anybody tell me how repeaters work ? I don't understand how > repeater > > > can regenerate > > > the two-way signals from both segment connected to the repeater. Isn't > it > > > forming a loop? > > > Pls forgive me asking the stupid question. > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > mlh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36444&t=36323 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]
I think the experience thing is the way to go. The market will get better sooner or later. I read something yesterday that stated the BA will lag behind the rest of the country in recovering from the recession. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marc Maxwell Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] Well, I agree. But the only thing I can do is try to remain optimistic. I relocated to the Bay area just prior to 9/11, the market wasn't great to begin with but just got worse...*hopefully* with no more major catastrophes, consumer confidence and spending will grow... As far as certs go, I am holding off getting some certs until I get the required experience to back it up. I am gauging it as I go. It takes more discipline this way but will be more rewarding in the long run and I will be stronger for it I believe. - Original Message - From: "adam lee" To: Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 10:58 PM Subject: RE: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > Here in the Bay Area you might be unemployed for a long time no matter what > cert you have. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > nrf > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 3:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well in the good old days of the economy, I made more than that even > before > > becoming a CCNA. I would never settle for 50k, even in this econ., > > If you're just a CCNA and you won't settle for 50k now, well then you might > be out of work for some time - a very very long time. > > > > especially as a CCIE. Plus, a CCIE IMO should already have exp., and lots > > of it. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of becoming a CCIE - cisco > > certified internet EXPERT! > > > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > A CCNA with little or no experience? Hardly. He's lucky to even land a > job > > > right now. I think this intern program is aimed at people new to the > > field. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:50 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > A CCNA makes more than 50k. And you wouldn't have to pay your company > to > > > work for them and get training. Most companies pay you and pay for your > > > training. > > > > > > -- > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > I've taken some classes at ICTP. From what I gather, their CCIE intern > > > > program works like this: you sign up for their CCIE program (which is > > not > > > > cheap I should add) and when you pass your CCIE written/lab (I vaguely > > > > remember that the CCIE written pass is all you need), you can work as > a > > > > subcontractor for ICTP. You make substantially less money than a > CCIE > > is > > > > "worth", (I believe around $50,000, don't quote me on that) but for > > those > > > > with little or no experience (i.e., people enrolling in this program), > > it > > > > works out really well. Hopefully Mr. Lee could explain the program > more > > in > > > > detail. > > > > > > > > - Sean > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:34 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps its a new look on recruiting, they train u, get a slice of the > > > > dough for awhile?? Just speculating of course.. > > > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Cisco Nuts wrote: > > > > > > > > > And upon finishing the program, how many years of slavery will we > > > > > unfortunate ones be indebted to your gracious company? :-) > > > > > Can you clarify this?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Jason Lee" > > > > > >Reply-To: "Jason Lee" > > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >Subject: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > >Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:40:20 -0500 > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > >My name is Jason Lee I currently work for ICTP located in anaheim > > > > > >california > > > > > >we are currently looking for few candidates to go through our very > > > > intense > > > > > >cisco training, also to note that upon finishing the program CEA > > (cisco > > > > > >expert academy)you can be eligible for an internship... we have > > > > information > > > > > >session going on every other friday, so if this sounds interesting > to > > > > you, > > > > > >or if you need a lab to study fo
Re: Lab this Fri. in RTP [7:36365]
As for route filtering, I can only think of distribute lists and wacky offset lists. Are there others? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Chuck"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > there's still time. > > 1) redistribution between any two routing protocols over any topology. > > 2) route filtering - there is more than one way > > 3) there is a topic that may be NDA if I say anything specific, but for > which there is a specific CCNP test, and which if you read this and/or the > CCIE list you see all kinds of questions, complaints, concerns. > > 4) there is one very important topic, but I don't want to say it directly > because I believe it crosses the NDA line. It has been discussed many times > here and over on the CCIE lab list. hope you have covered it. you may want > to check the archives of both lists to see what kinds of things are covered. > > Knock 'em dead, pal! > > Chuck > > > > ""Richard Newman"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Any last minute study suggestions. I've been through all the FatKid and > > CCBoot Camp labs twice. There are a couple of areas where I'm shaky which > > I'll be concentrating on. What should my focus be in this the last few > days > > of studing? > > > > Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36440&t=36365 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off Topic - HR 1542 vote Wednesday [7:36446]
My employer internal e-mail is telling me that HR 1542 comes up for a vote this Wednesday. If you have an opinion one way or another, you may want to express it to your representative. HR 1542 would among other things allow RBOCs to enter into the long distance data market ( not voice, so I'm told ) It is also supposed to open up the ISP broadband market, which my employer says is dominated by cable companies and bankrupt CLEC's. IMHO this would prove among other things a real boon to voice over IP as well as data only networks, as your customers or your company could now obtain more or al of their service from a single carrier within any of the RBOC regions. ( There would still be 3rd party participation across RBOC boundaries. ) I personally think this is a good idea, but you may disagree. In either case, let your reps know how you feel. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36446&t=36446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lab this Fri. in RTP [7:36365]
sure - route tags, prefix lists, various and sundry route-maps. gotta know them! after all, if your only tool is a hammer, all your routing tables will look like you've been nailed ;-> Chuck ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > As for route filtering, I can only think of distribute lists and wacky > offset lists. Are there others? > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > ""Chuck"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > there's still time. > > > > 1) redistribution between any two routing protocols over any topology. > > > > 2) route filtering - there is more than one way > > > > 3) there is a topic that may be NDA if I say anything specific, but for > > which there is a specific CCNP test, and which if you read this and/or the > > CCIE list you see all kinds of questions, complaints, concerns. > > > > 4) there is one very important topic, but I don't want to say it directly > > because I believe it crosses the NDA line. It has been discussed many > times > > here and over on the CCIE lab list. hope you have covered it. you may want > > to check the archives of both lists to see what kinds of things are > covered. > > > > Knock 'em dead, pal! > > > > Chuck > > > > > > > > ""Richard Newman"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Any last minute study suggestions. I've been through all the FatKid and > > > CCBoot Camp labs twice. There are a couple of areas where I'm shaky > which > > > I'll be concentrating on. What should my focus be in this the last few > > days > > > of studing? > > > > > > Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36447&t=36365 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448]
Cisco people I would like to know your impression of Foundry Networks. Are they something to worry about? Regards, Eric Washington _ $B$+$o(B & $B;H$($k%V%i%&%6$G!"%$%s%?!<%M%C%H@83h$,$b$C$H3Z$7$/$J$k!*(B http://explorer.msn.co.jp/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36448&t=36448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ciscoworks autodiscovery [7:36386]
Have you entered seed device(s) ?
Sasa
CCIE No 8635
Patrick Ramsey wrote:
>
> Hey group,
>
> Anybody run into any problems with autodicovery form ani?
>
> I installed the entire lan management collection, browsed to ciscoworks
url,
> changed the autodicovery dates/times...Then it asked me if I would like to
> go ahead and perform an autodiscovery... wow...how convienant...of course I
> would!... and WAHLA! uhh... nothing happened... so I thought...maybe
> I'll let it sit over the weekend and run through all the different times I
> had autodiscovery set up for... and low and behold still nothing!
>
> what gives? my snmp strings are as follows
>
> *.*.*.*:pub::priv
>
> with pub and priv being substituted for the real deal...
>
> any ideas? Is there some cheezy setting somewhere I am just missing?
>
> -Patrick
>
> > Confidentiality DisclaimerThis email and any files
transmitted with it may contain confidential and
> /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
> Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
> addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
> privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
> copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
> subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
> email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete
this
> email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36449&t=36386
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344]
> If Howard is going to be at the meeting, then everyone > attending must be asked the following questions to gain > entrance: > > 1. What is your name? > 2. What is your quest? > 3. What is your favorite color?? :-) > You, sirrah, will have to buy a shrubbery. "Bruce Evry" 2/25/02 3:51:53 PM >>> > Dear Kevin and Everyone Else, > > Afraid I got caught in a time warp, the message got posted > a > day > after the meeting. Oh well > > We will try once again - This coming Saturday, March 2, > 2002. > Time: Noon to 4 PM. > Place: Bruce's House (under construction...) > 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, Maryland 20744 > > Howard Berkowitz may be making a special guest appearance > and > we > may get to log into 2 remote CCIE Labs to finally answer the > question of > what is the WORST possible way to redistribute OSPF and > IGRP! > > Everyone is invited. Our group is informal and there are no > fees, > dues, or secret handshakes to learn. All you need is an > interest in Cisco. > (of course bringing snacks and sodas is always encouraged!) > > Bring laptops and gear if you have them. If not bring > yourself! > > Do try and let me know how many people are coming so I can > get > an > appropriate amount of food. (my treat but donations are > accepted) > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry > > > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Kevin Wigle wrote: > >> guess you didn't want a big turn out since I see it >> says > sent >> Sunday, 24 Feb >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bruce Evry" >> To: >> Sent: Sunday, 24 February, 2002 10:57 >> Subject: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344] >> >> >> > Dear Friends, >> > >> > After taking the month of January off, we are going to >> > hold the next meeting/luncheon of the Washington DC group >> > this coming > Saturday. >> > >> > Saturday, February 23, 2002 >> > Time 10 am to 4 pm >> > Place - Bruce's House with newly rebuilt Garage! >> > 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, MD 20744 >> > >> > Please bring Laptops, Snacks, Sodas, Desserts and of >> > course >> > Routers and Switches. >> > >> > This session we will be doing OSPF and IGRP >> > redistribution the hard way. Figure it's about time we >> > kill this thing and nail down > the lid >> > to its coffin... :) >> > >> > Speaking of learning Cisco stuff, I want to thank all of >> > you who sent such nice replies to my question about >> > affordable training. >> > >> > I would like to offer interested folks the chance to come >> > visit us here at my house for a week and to do >> > total-immersion Cisco Study. > This >> > will be geared toward the CCIE Practical Lab. >> > >> > Monday will be about designing your very own lab. Then on >> > Tuesday through Friday you get to build your lab! (and >> > try others as well) >> > >> > Topics covered will include Ethernet, Token Ring, Frame >> > Relay, > ISDN, ATM, >> > Voice, along with all our favorite routing protocols, >> > RIP, IGRP, > EIGRP, >> > OSPF, and BGP. Bonus extras include NAT, PAT, HSRP, >> > HTTP, NTP, > SMTP, and >> > FOOD! >> > >> > This offer includes room and board for those of you who >> > are out of town. Please contact me for details and >> > pricing. (it'll be > reasonable!) >> > >> > Home Phone 301-292-5231 >> > Cell Phone 202-262-5324 >> > E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36450&t=36344 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344]
And 4. What problem are you trying to solve? ;-) And don't forget your shrubbery! Priscilla At 06:18 PM 2/25/02, John Neiberger wrote: >If Howard is going to be at the meeting, then everyone attending must be >asked the following questions to gain entrance: > >1. What is your name? >2. What is your quest? >3. What is your favorite color?? :-) > > >>> "Bruce Evry" 2/25/02 3:51:53 PM >>> >Dear Kevin and Everyone Else, > > Afraid I got caught in a time warp, the message got posted a >day >after the meeting. Oh well > > We will try once again - This coming Saturday, March 2, 2002. > Time: Noon to 4 PM. > Place: Bruce's House (under construction...) > 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, Maryland 20744 > > Howard Berkowitz may be making a special guest appearance and >we >may get to log into 2 remote CCIE Labs to finally answer the question >of >what is the WORST possible way to redistribute OSPF and IGRP! > > Everyone is invited. Our group is informal and there are no >fees, >dues, or secret handshakes to learn. All you need is an interest in >Cisco. > (of course bringing snacks and sodas is always encouraged!) > > Bring laptops and gear if you have them. If not bring yourself! > > Do try and let me know how many people are coming so I can get >an >appropriate amount of food. (my treat but donations are accepted) > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry > > > >On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Kevin Wigle wrote: > > > guess you didn't want a big turn out since I see it says >sent > > Sunday, 24 Feb > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Bruce Evry" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, 24 February, 2002 10:57 > > Subject: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344] > > > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > > > After taking the month of January off, we are going to hold the > > > next meeting/luncheon of the Washington DC group this coming >Saturday. > > > > > > Saturday, February 23, 2002 > > > Time 10 am to 4 pm > > > Place - Bruce's House with newly rebuilt Garage! > > > 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, MD 20744 > > > > > > Please bring Laptops, Snacks, Sodas, Desserts and of course > > > Routers and Switches. > > > > > > This session we will be doing OSPF and IGRP redistribution the > > > hard way. Figure it's about time we kill this thing and nail down >the lid > > > to its coffin... :) > > > > > > Speaking of learning Cisco stuff, I want to thank all of you who > > > sent such nice replies to my question about affordable training. > > > > > > I would like to offer interested folks the chance to come visit us > > > here at my house for a week and to do total-immersion Cisco Study. >This > > > will be geared toward the CCIE Practical Lab. > > > > > > Monday will be about designing your very own lab. Then on Tuesday > > > through Friday you get to build your lab! (and try others as well) > > > > > > Topics covered will include Ethernet, Token Ring, Frame Relay, >ISDN, ATM, > > > Voice, along with all our favorite routing protocols, RIP, IGRP, >EIGRP, > > > OSPF, and BGP. Bonus extras include NAT, PAT, HSRP, HTTP, NTP, >SMTP, and > > > FOOD! > > > > > > This offer includes room and board for those of you who are out of > > > town. Please contact me for details and pricing. (it'll be >reasonable!) > > > > > > Home Phone 301-292-5231 > > > Cell Phone 202-262-5324 > > > E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36452&t=36344 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448]
Depends on what you mean by "worry". I've got a couple of Foundry's in addition to the Cisco stuff. Both L2 and L3. I like them. I like the support. And I like the company. Best, G. > -Original Message- > From: Washington Rico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448] > > > Cisco people I would like to know your impression of Foundry > Networks. Are > they something to worry about? > > Regards, > Eric Washington > > _ > $B$+$o(B & > $B;H$($k%V%i%&%6$G!"%$%s%?! http://explorer.msn.co.jp/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36451&t=36448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344]
1. Dusty 2. CCIE 3. Blue... no... wait... Green... (Its only a flesh wound) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344] > If Howard is going to be at the meeting, then everyone > attending must be asked the following questions to gain > entrance: > > 1. What is your name? > 2. What is your quest? > 3. What is your favorite color?? :-) > You, sirrah, will have to buy a shrubbery. "Bruce Evry" 2/25/02 3:51:53 PM >>> > Dear Kevin and Everyone Else, > > Afraid I got caught in a time warp, the message got posted > a > day > after the meeting. Oh well > > We will try once again - This coming Saturday, March 2, > 2002. > Time: Noon to 4 PM. > Place: Bruce's House (under construction...) > 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, Maryland 20744 > > Howard Berkowitz may be making a special guest appearance > and > we > may get to log into 2 remote CCIE Labs to finally answer the > question of > what is the WORST possible way to redistribute OSPF and > IGRP! > > Everyone is invited. Our group is informal and there are no > fees, > dues, or secret handshakes to learn. All you need is an > interest in Cisco. > (of course bringing snacks and sodas is always encouraged!) > > Bring laptops and gear if you have them. If not bring > yourself! > > Do try and let me know how many people are coming so I can > get > an > appropriate amount of food. (my treat but donations are > accepted) > > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry > > > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Kevin Wigle wrote: > >> guess you didn't want a big turn out since I see it >> says > sent >> Sunday, 24 Feb >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bruce Evry" >> To: >> Sent: Sunday, 24 February, 2002 10:57 >> Subject: Cisco Meeting & Affordable Classes [7:36344] >> >> >> > Dear Friends, >> > >> > After taking the month of January off, we are going to >> > hold the next meeting/luncheon of the Washington DC group >> > this coming > Saturday. >> > >> > Saturday, February 23, 2002 >> > Time 10 am to 4 pm >> > Place - Bruce's House with newly rebuilt Garage! >> > 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, MD 20744 >> > >> > Please bring Laptops, Snacks, Sodas, Desserts and of >> > course >> > Routers and Switches. >> > >> > This session we will be doing OSPF and IGRP >> > redistribution the hard way. Figure it's about time we >> > kill this thing and nail down > the lid >> > to its coffin... :) >> > >> > Speaking of learning Cisco stuff, I want to thank all of >> > you who sent such nice replies to my question about >> > affordable training. >> > >> > I would like to offer interested folks the chance to come >> > visit us here at my house for a week and to do >> > total-immersion Cisco Study. > This >> > will be geared toward the CCIE Practical Lab. >> > >> > Monday will be about designing your very own lab. Then on >> > Tuesday through Friday you get to build your lab! (and >> > try others as well) >> > >> > Topics covered will include Ethernet, Token Ring, Frame >> > Relay, > ISDN, ATM, >> > Voice, along with all our favorite routing protocols, >> > RIP, IGRP, > EIGRP, >> > OSPF, and BGP. Bonus extras include NAT, PAT, HSRP, >> > HTTP, NTP, > SMTP, and >> > FOOD! >> > >> > This offer includes room and board for those of you who >> > are out of town. Please contact me for details and >> > pricing. (it'll be > reasonable!) >> > >> > Home Phone 301-292-5231 >> > Cell Phone 202-262-5324 >> > E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > Yours Truly - Bruce Evry > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36453&t=36344 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please help me answer this question [7:36295]
On Jul 16, 11:56am, "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote: } } It sounds like you're trying to pass the CID test. You should have signed } an NDA that says that you won't disclose questions on the test. This reply isn't aimed at any single person, since several people did the same thing. The original poster did not specify the source of the question. Therefore, he did not disclose that it is a question on the test, so unless the reader has already taken the test, they wouldn't know that it is a question on the test. Several people responded claiming that the question came from a test, thus disclosing a question on the test, thus breaking NDA. Ironic, isn't it? Without the whistle blowers, nobody would have been the wiser. I haven't taken any Cisco exams yet (mainly due to lack of time); but, I have taken Microsoft exams. I found a couple of questions that were on Microsoft exams that were exactly the same as some questions in the official Microsoft study material. So, without asking the person, we can't be sure what the source of the question was. Another thing I noticed is that all the people replying kept the question, thus circulating the question more and adding more copies of it to the archives. If you really must be a whistle blower, then it would be best do directly so you can avoid the above problems. }-- End of excerpt from "Priscilla Oppenheimer" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36455&t=36295 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Aironet 350 WAP Load Balancing [7:36399]
Mark, in a wireless environment, the WAP's talk over the wired network using SNAP packets, so they don't have to see each other via the wireless channels. In the case of wireless load balancing, you must have the WAP's very close with major overlap in the wireless coverage to achieve any load balancing. In fact, having them sit within a few feet of each other will assure the best coverage in a load balanced area. The most effective throughput is using three WAP's sitting on top of each other using channels 1, 6 &11. Again, assuming these are using the same SSID and WEP keys, the effective throughput (in marketing terms) is 33M. You can achieve similar results with wireless bridges, which do talk to each other over the wireless network. Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. -Original Message- From: Mark Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:55 PM To: Jeffrey Reed Subject: Re: Aironet 350 WAP Load Balancing [7:36399] Am I correct that this only works in a Horizontal environment as you can not have the same channels overlapping when the WAPs can not see each other? So in a vertical/horizontal environment, it really isn't feasible? - Original Message - From: "Jeffrey Reed" To: Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: RE: Aironet 350 WAP Load Balancing [7:36399] > Assuming the WEP configuration is the same for both access points and all > clients: > > -Using different 2.4Ghz channels will facilitate load balancing via two > different 11M channels (more bandwidth). > -Using the same channel will load balance within the same 11M channel. > > All of this is done automatically. > > > Jeffrey Reed > Classic Networking, Inc. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Maverick > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Aironet 350 WAP Load Balancing [7:36399] > > Hi, > > Quick question. If I have two Aironet 350 WAP in range of each other, do > they automatically load balance? Any configuration needed. > > The release notes seems to imply that this is done automatically > > thks > > YK Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36456&t=36399 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installing new IOS on new flash [7:36457]
Hi, This is my first post so if I did anything incorrectly, please let me know. I have recently replaced my 8 meg flash with a 16 meg flash memory on a 2611. Is there a faster way of loading the ios image onto this blank flash than using xmodem. Thanks, LW _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36457&t=36457 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.....CCIE..... [7:36091]
I think that's coming back to being more true again. A cert in a certain product is not what the better IT managers look for, systems in general are what they want. The proverbial "they" are looking for people that can do everything from network, Unix, NT, sniffers, and mainframes, etc. to give the higher paying jobs. Moral of the story Diversify. > - Original Message - > From: "ko haag" > To: > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:47 PM > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > I can remember in the old days when experience was more important than > certs > > and having > > certs was a plus. > > > > Ko > > > > "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > > > > > I'm more than a CCNA. I was saying that back when I was a CCNA, I > wouldn't > > > have settled for less than 50K. But you did bring up the good point > that > > in > > > this economy a CCNA wouldn't get a job at 50K. I guess that it could be > > > true. > > > > > > -- > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > ""nrf"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > Well in the good old days of the economy, I made more than that even > > > > before > > > > > becoming a CCNA. I would never settle for 50k, even in this econ., > > > > > > > > If you're just a CCNA and you won't settle for 50k now, well then you > > > might > > > > be out of work for some time - a very very long time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > especially as a CCIE. Plus, a CCIE IMO should already have exp., > and > > > lots > > > > > of it. Otherwise it defeats the purpose of becoming a CCIE - cisco > > > > > certified internet EXPERT! > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > > A CCNA with little or no experience? Hardly. He's lucky to even > land > > a > > > > job > > > > > > right now. I think this intern program is aimed at people new to > the > > > > > field. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:50 PM > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A CCNA makes more than 50k. And you wouldn't have to pay your > > company > > > > to > > > > > > work for them and get training. Most companies pay you and pay > for > > > your > > > > > > training. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Sean Knox"" wrote in message > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > > > I've taken some classes at ICTP. From what I gather, their CCIE > > > intern > > > > > > > program works like this: you sign up for their CCIE program > (which > > > is > > > > > not > > > > > > > cheap I should add) and when you pass your CCIE written/lab (I > > > vaguely > > > > > > > remember that the CCIE written pass is all you need), you can > work > > > as > > > > a > > > > > > > subcontractor for ICTP. You make substantially less money than > a > > > > CCIE > > > > > is > > > > > > > "worth", (I believe around $50,000, don't quote me on that) but > for > > > > > those > > > > > > > with little or no experience (i.e., people enrolling in this > > > program), > > > > > it > > > > > > > works out really well. Hopefully Mr. Lee could explain the > program > > > > more > > > > > in > > > > > > > detail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > > From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:34 AM > > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Subject: Re: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps its a new look on recruiting, they train u, get a slice > of > > > the > > > > > > > dough for awhile?? Just speculating of course.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Cisco Nuts wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And upon finishing the program, how many years of slavery will > we > > > > > > > > unfortunate ones be indebted to your gracious company? :-) > > > > > > > > Can you clarify this?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Jason Lee" > > > > > > > > >Reply-To: "Jason Lee" > > > > > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >Subject: CISCO INTERNSHIP.CCIE. [7:36091] > > > > > > > > >Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:40:20 -0500 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >My name is Jason Lee I currently work for ICTP located in > > anaheim > > > > > > > > >california > > > > > > > > >we are currently looking for few candidates to go through our > > > very > > > > > > > intense > > > > > > > > >cisco training,
RE: Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448]
I have heard the guys that started Foundry left Cisco, how true that is I do not know. But I am so surprised that nothing has come of a lawsuit because the CLI and almost all commands are like Cisco's from what I have seen of them. I do know one thing about them they are very sturdy in heat. In the environment they were in we had some Cisco's fail and Xylan switches fail due to heat; we finally did get ac put in that janitors closet :) but the Foundry were rock solid in the heat. These were Big Iron 8000 by the way. You can go here for a buyers guide comparison but I do not know how up to date it is. http://www.networkcomputing.com/ibg/Products?guide_id=2444 Now that is my one bad comment against Cisco for the year :) www.digitalrage.org latest in Technical News and HowTo's www.digitalrage.org/phpBB Discussion Forums -Original Message- From: Hartnell, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448] Depends on what you mean by "worry". I've got a couple of Foundry's in addition to the Cisco stuff. Both L2 and L3. I like them. I like the support. And I like the company. Best, G. > -Original Message- > From: Washington Rico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448] > > > Cisco people I would like to know your impression of Foundry > Networks. Are > they something to worry about? > > Regards, > Eric Washington > > _ > $B$+$o(B & > $B;H$($k%V%i%&%6$G!"%$%s%?! http://explorer.msn.co.jp/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36454&t=36448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco VS Foundry Networks.. [7:36448]
Worry about in what sense? Foundry makes quality gear, etc. They just came out with their new ASIC (JetCore) and theirs a few products out based on it. They also have The FoundryMan Action figure :) Extreme also makes quality gear, as well as a number of other major/popular vendors. I do multi-vendor tech support for a big company and work on gear from many vendors. I don't have a preference other then I want exposure to as many vendors as I can. Bottom line, is you shouldn't base decisions on a nameplate or color. Look into the features, hardware arch., performance, reviews, etc. Erick B. --- Washington Rico wrote: > Cisco people I would like to know your impression of > Foundry Networks. Are > they something to worry about? > > Regards, > Eric Washington __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36459&t=36448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Should I buy IDS ? [7:36053]
Actually I'm not a big fan of LIDS, I much prefer grsecurity.
It's got some really nice features and its better maintained on alot of
things.
www.grsecurity.net
-jeff
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Patrick Ramsey wrote:
> www.snort.org
>
> and remember
>
> www.lids.org
>
> :) Install lids then snort... (unless you are plannign on runnign snort on
> a microsoft platform! :) (but that kinda defeats the purpose of
security...)
>
> >>> "Tel Khan" 02/21/02 10:12AM >>>
> Hi,
>
> Where can i obtain information on SNORT?
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Tel
> > Confidentiality DisclaimerThis email and any files
transmitted with it may contain confidential and
> /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
> Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
> addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
> privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
> copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
> subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
> email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete
this
> email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36460&t=36053
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
