RE: RIP Broadcast issues and NBMA stuff. ? directed-broadcast? [7:50237]
r6 was generating the route to 24.0.0.0/8 fine but as soon as I configured the ip broadcast-adress 172.16.56.1 then as you can see in the original message, the route stopped getting learnt and was about to timeout. What I was thinking would happen is that R6 instead of sending a broadcast to 255.255.255.255 for r5 to hear, that I would be able to send a direct broadcast right to 172.16.56.1 (e0 address of r5) and then it would process it and understand it. Anyone? Tim -Original Message- From: Ouellette, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:07 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RIP Broadcast issues and NBMA stuff. ? directed-broadcast? Team, after reading some interesting documents on Cisco. I discovered the ip broadcast-address command. I instantly though of NBMA broadcast issues. I thought this command would be usefull. I did use plain ethernet in the following scenario just to test but I would think it would work in other scenarions. Here's the scenarion. R5 has some other network hanging off it, including 192.168.1.0/24, 10.1.1.0/24 and R6 has 24.0.0.0/8 off of it. Rather than have r6 broadcast to 255.255.255.255 on the ethernet segment, I issued a ip broadcast-address 172.16.51.1 which is more of a unicast type packet but I figured that the R5 would take this update without a problem. R5 (.1)--172.16.56.0/30 --(.2) R6 r6(config)#int e0 r6(config-if)#ip broadcast-address 172.16.56.1 ? r6(config-if)#ip broadcast-address 172.16.56.1 r6# %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by consolesh ip int e0 Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is up Internet address is 172.16.56.2/30 Broadcast address is 172.16.56.1 Address determined by setup command MTU is 1500 bytes r6# IP: s=172.16.56.2 (local), d=172.16.56.1 (Ethernet0), len 25, sending broad/mult icastUDP src=520, dst=520 As you can see, R6 is sending the update to 172.16.56.1 which is the ip address of the e0 interface of r5. However, r5 isn't liking the update and the routing table looks like the following. r5#r Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR P - periodic downloaded static route Gateway of last resort is not set 172.16.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 172.16.56.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0 R24.0.0.0/8 [120/1] via 172.16.56.2, 00:01:54, Ethernet0/0 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 10.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback1 C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0 r5# Does anyone have any ideas? Tim _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50237t=50237 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Xyplex Maxserver 1600 as a router terminal ser [7:49506]
I bought one on ebay without the flash card. Got it setup and working (software image loaded from bootp). Didn't like it much and got a great deal on a cisco 516 so it's basically just sitting there. I'll send you some intructions that I put together figuring this beast out. Tim -Original Message- From: John Matney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 4:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Xyplex Maxserver 1600 as a router terminal server? [7:49474] Anyone using a Maxserver series terminal server in their rack? I got a 24 port one for free and would love to use it in my lab. However, this thing has proven a major PITA to configure! If anyone out there has configured one of thse I would really appreciate some tips or examples. Thanks in advance, John Matney Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49506t=49506 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ospf redistruibution query. [7:48817]
What about creating a NSSA and you can create a summary type 7 route, and have the ABR do the type 7 to type 5 conversion which should meet your requirement of not having any type 5's. -Original Message- From: Casey, Paul (6822) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 4:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ospf redistruibution query. [7:48817] Hello, Can some help me with this please. (See below) Propagate OSPF loopback addresses on a router into the OSPF process. However OSPF can NOT be run on these interfaces + when propagated, the routes should NOT show up as OSPF external routes. I dont see how this can be done, no matter the routes are redistributed, I would have thought they would have always shown up as External routes, even using the rediustributed connected command. Its just a secenario I am working on. Any help appreciated. Kind regards. Paul. This E-mail is from O2. The E-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may also be privileged and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised direct or indirect dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received the E-mail in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] or telephone ++ 353 1 6095000. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48820t=48817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: confusion on ppp auth chap callin/ppp auth pap [7:48325]
I prefer to use the terms calling and called. Such that your statement would be. the calling device places a call to the called device, the called device receives the call, the called device calls the call initiating (calling) device back. Maybe that will help? -Original Message- From: Carl Timm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: confusion on ppp auth chap callin/ppp auth pap [7:48325] When using PPP callin, it occurs on the receiving device. Conceptually think of it this way, the calling device places a call, the receiving device receives the call, the calling device calls the initiating device back. Hope this helps. Carl Timm, CCIE# 7149 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48453t=48325 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: h225 IE data [7:48352]
I too would also be curious to see what Cisco pointed you to if anything. -Original Message- From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 6:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: h225 IE data [7:48352] first off, I don't know the answer to your question. Having just sold a couple of AVVID's, I am interested, though in toll fraud and how it is pulled off. I know that in the PBX world there are or were certain timeout settings that generally had to be adjusted down to zero so that a hacker couldn't to an effective DoS and get dial tone. ( IIRC, hackers would use a blue box and just keep pounding a PBX until it gave up and offered dial tone. There were specific timeout settings that had to be zero to prevent this, IIRC ) Chris, without revealing the specifics of your situation, were there / are there specific Call Manager configurations you were able to change to prevent this going forward? Did Cisco point you to any specific links to read up on? Chris Charlebois wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... We have been experiencing some toll fraud with our CallManager / Unity system. Thanks to CCM traces we were able to find out exactly how they were getting in. However, we still don't know who they are. The ANI on the incoming calls was blocked (suprise suprise). What I'm wondering if there is any information that we can get from the H225 data. I know we won't be able to get the calling number, but maybe we can pull out what city they are calling from, or what carrier they are using, or any information at all. It is possible that the FBI will get involved in this (the destination of these calls are countries that the FBI has an interest in) and, if they do, I'm sure they have ways and means to get far more information than I do. I'm just courious. If anyone knows what can be learned from H225 and how, I'd appreciate it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48366t=48352 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting to 516-CS - Problems [7:47342]
Do you have the document on how to reset the CS 516 to it's defaults? If not, email me and i'll see if I can send it over to you. That's what I had to do on my cs-516 and it works great! Tim -Original Message- From: trammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Connecting to 516-CS - Problems [7:47342] Hello all. I recently acquired a 516-CS on ebay for use in my home pod. The problem I have is connecting to the darn thing. I am either making a foolish mistake or there is something wrong with the box. The unit comes up fine with the OK led lit green once booted. I know that the ethernet interface is up and functioning because I am able to telnet to it, just can't log in because I do not have the passwords. I am trying to console into the box however and I am not having any luck. I am using a regular DB9 console kit (DB9 FemailRolled Cable) to connect to J1 with 9600-8-N-1. I am getting the feeling that the box is either corrupt in some manner or I am not using the correct cable configuration to connect to the box. If anyone has any insight on this it is appreciated. Cheers. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47360t=47342 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Teltone TLS-x question for the group [7:45692]
I bought a TLS-4 from ebay for the purpose of studying for DDR. It's great and you have 4 ports on it (they make a 5 port version too I think) so therefor, 4 cheapy USR modems off of ebay and make yourself a couple of cables and you can multiple devices able to call each other without much messing around. Lemme know if you need some more info. -Original Message- From: John Dorffler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Teltone TLS-x question for the group [7:45692] I have been thinking about buying a Teltone TLS (telephone line simulator) and wanted to get your opinions on which model to get and which model to avoid. I want to play with async dialup connections using routers and modems, but after reading the specs on each model I am confused as to which model would be good enough. I suppose I could get a -5 (the top model), but do I really need it to just dial between two routers? I just want to have one router dial a number and connect to another router, or simulate dialing in to a router to manage it remotely. And please don't tell me to just use two real phone lines :p Thanks, John Dorffler CCIE #6677 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45817t=45692 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108]
In your scenario. PC2 will do a lookup to to find out if PC1 is on the same subnet as itself (when it's trying to reply). After it does this lookup if it determines that it's on the same subnet (by looking at the address and mask) it'll send out a ARP request to resolve the layer 2 address of the other machine. If it determines that it's not on the same subnet it will not ARP for the layer 2 address and normally would send to it's default gateway. But since you don't have one defined, it won't ARP at all nor will it send to a default gateway since it doesn't have one. Here's an addition that I recall doing in a weird situation I was working on at work. Try putting it's own address in the default gateway and see if it doesn't ARP for EVERYTHING it is trying to connect to. Tim -Original Message- From: Henrique Duarte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108] John, thanks for the feedback. So PC2 doesn't have a default gateway configured and will send a broadcast for the address of PC1. Since router B is on the same subnet and knows where PC1 is, shouldn't it respond as a proxy? -H - Original Message - From: John Neiberger To: Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 5:13 PM Subject: Re: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108] Unless you're bridging, ARP doesn't function here the way I _think_ you think it does. If PC2 receives an incoming ICMP echo request and it wants to generate a response, it first compares the network portion of the destination address to its own subnet. If you're not bridging they will be different. In that case, PC2 will not send an ARP request for PC1, it will simply forward the packet to the default gateway. Of course, at some point PC2 will send an ARP request to get the hardware address of Router B, but it will never need to know the hardware address of PC1. Now, if you're bridging then PC1 and PC2 should be on the same subnet and neither would require a default gateway to speak to the other. HTH, John Henrique Duarte 5/13/02 2:50:43 PM OK Networking gurus. I hope you can help me with this easy one: e0 e1e0 e1 PC1---router A--routerB-PC2 PC1 can ping routerB (e1) PC2 can ping routerA (e0) PC1 cannot ping PC2 PC2 has NO default gateway (and is not supposed to have one). I've added a static arp entry on PC2: PC1's IP address point to routerB e1's MAC address. Why do I need the default gateway even though I already configured a static arp entry on PC2? Thanks in advance, -H Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44180t=44108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fw: Is IGRP actually supported by other vendors? [7:43994]
Below is some information that i've pulled from Cisco.com Summary Cisco Systems's EIGRP is one of the most feature-rich and robust routing protocols to ever be developed. Its unique combination of features blends the best attributes of distance vector protocols with the best attributes of link-state protocols. The result is a hybrid routing protocol that defies easy categorization with conventional protocols. EIGRP is also remarkably easy to configure and use, as well as remarkably efficient and secure in operation. It can be used in conjunction with IPv4, AppleTalk, and IPX. More importantly, its modular architecture will readily enable Cisco to add support for other routed protocols that may be developed in the future. Enhanced IGRP relies on four fundamental concepts: neighbor tables, topology tables, route states, and route tagging. Each of these is summarized in the discussions that follow. Other than the fact that cisco says EIGRP was developed from IGRP and they will redistribute between themselves automatically. I don't see the similarity between them. I struggle to see how EIGRP is anything like a distance-vector protocol. Tim -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fw: Is IGRP actually supported by other vendors? [7:43994] Forgot to send this to list as well. - Original Message - From: Mike Mandulak To: Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:13 PM Subject: Re: Is IGRP actually supported by other vendors? [7:43994] Lammle refers to EIGRP as being a Hybrid of distance-vector and link state. He only gives a brief mention of EIGRP and says to refer to the CCNP study guide for more info. Lammle is quoting incorrect marketing information from Cisco. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44183t=43994 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cmd. to test all 7 layers of the OSI?? [7:44157]
Any application that you can run on your PC in my eyes would test all 7 layers. Including that MSN messenger product that's quoted at the bottom of your message. tim -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cmd. to test all 7 layers of the OSI?? [7:44157] Hello,What is the command that tests all 7 layers of the OSI?My answer is any protocol that works at the Application layer including telnet, ftp etc. But my coworker thinks it's only telnet?Anyone with ideas??Thanks! Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44176t=44157 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE #9240 -Back OT [7:42949]
If you go straight AUX-to-AUX you really don't have DDR. All you have is interface async1, a dialer profile and a always-on interface you can route over. Why not pick yourself up a pots simulator such as Teletone TLS-4 and have true DDR. Atleast, that's what I did at home and it works great. The box I bought (tls-4) has 4 ports on it and I can have different routers calling each other depending on my scenario. Lemme know if you need more information on this. Btw, check out ebay for prices. Tim -Original Message- From: Johnny Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE #9240 -Back OT To get this thread back on topic. I have a question. When connecting 2 routers via their respective AUX ports to practice DDR, what cable is used? Is it a rollover cable? Best Regards, Johnny Peterson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sanjay Prajapati Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:49 PM To: 'Zhang, Stan'; 'Church, Chuck ' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE #9240 - Pretty OT at this point. AYE!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Zhang, Stan Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 7:16 PM To: 'Church, Chuck ' Cc: ''[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ' Subject: RE: CCIE #9240 - Pretty OT at this point. Chuck is our man!! Let kill the thread. All those agree please reply to this thread and say AYE. SZ -Original Message- From: Church, Chuck Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: 4/30/02 9:55 PM Subject: CCIE #9240 - Pretty OT at this point. Can't we all just get along? We've gone through this thread before. The CCIE lab has definitely changed over the last 5 years, but I don't think anyone can make a call as to when it was most difficult. In the old days, it was more of a research project. There was no information on it. Just lots of rumors. As info and study guides/practice labs came out, Cisco made it tougher by cramming more in, making time a bigger issue. Does that make one harder than the other? The passing rate is still in the 10-15% range, so I think it's still adequately difficult. But then again, who cares? With the dollars and responsibility involved in hiring a network engineer, you can bet a company will look hard at one's resume, and ask several hours of tough questions. Those who don't have what it takes either won't be hired, or will be the first to be let go. Just don't ever stop learning, that's what I say. Chuck Church CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE Sr. Network Engineer US Tennis Association 70 W. Red Oak Lane White Plains, NY 10604 914-696-7199 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mingzhou Nie Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 7:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Sean Wu; 'Peter Rosenthal'; thomas larus; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE #9240 You are wrong, Dave. When I say won't ever thing earlier CCIEs are better technically, I have no intention to disdain old takers, I simply counter Sean's point that older CCIEs are more admirable in terms of indepent studying. Is a CCIE 9200 superior to CCIE2? No way. Just because there's more ways to discuss and practice doesn't challenge a CCIE's accountibilty. I'm certainly ignorant at some point because I'm not a perfect man. However, being an OLDER CCIE, you simply take my words personal and distorted my original thought. You are ignorant in my opinion, thought you are a CCIE. Don't take it personal, Dave. You are welcome to debate with me. Let's take if offline if you will. --- MADMAN wrote: I thought better for a moment than to even respond to your email but I think you may be missing a clue. I'm one of the 1996 test takers. Yes you are correct, there was no voice, QOS, switches nor several of the knobs available now. In 5 years from now there will be new technologies that people will be learning, does this mean people who are currently passing will be the equivalent to your view of the 1996/97 CCIE's? What else has changed Mingzhou? There was no Cisco press, CCNA, CCNP, CCXX..., no bootcamps, no world wide mail lists brimming with NDA info, no virtual labs etc. You learned by working on networks and studing based on the little info available concerning the lab and when you felt up to it you went to San Jose. So do you suppose those who took the test then fell off the face of the earth or what?? Who do think helped test, implement, troubleshoot, teach etc. the new technologies that are currently being tested??? BTW, I don't think most of the old CCIE's give a damn what you think of us technically anyway but thanks for sharing your ignorance. Dave Mingzhou Nie wrote: I don't agree, Sean. Do you know what had been tested in 1996/7. There's no voice, not Qos, no new techs that has since been added. I won't ever thing earlier CCIEs are better
RE: a good forum [7:42813]
Canada has 34 million people, China has 1 billion. They should have more CCIE's. I wonder if that guy feels like Mr. Special compared to the guy that I was just reading about on cisco.com who is a quad-ccie and is going for a 5th when the newest track comes out. BTW, Does it make you feel to throw out someone else's achievements and pretend you had something to do with it and laugh at the person you threw them out at? If so, I know a dual ccie who has a doctorate in bimolecular sciences. ahahhahahahahhaha Tim -Original Message- From: supernet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: a good forum [7:42813] Because China has 338 CCIEs (more than Canada, Japan, France or Austrilia). I bet they are dealing with Cisco gear. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html By the way, if you think you are Mr. Someone, check out this Chinese guy: http://www.ccie.com.cn/ hahahhahaahha Yoshi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael L. Williams Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: a good forum [7:42813] (Devil's advocate) Why can we safely assume that (China has plenty of Cisco gear)? Mike W. Peter van Oene wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... him personally, or china in general? you can safely assume that china has plenty of cisco gear. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42948t=42813 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Way OT: Enterasys Switching [7:42212]
Sorry for posting about other vendors but I have to take a certification test for my company and I was wondering if anyone has taken the Enterasys ES Switching ceritifcation and the roamabout wireless certification test? If so, any help on what it may be like as I'm unable to find any information about it. Thanks! Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42212t=42212 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 100Mbit cable can't shorter than 6 feets????? [7:41448]
Chee, I've never heard of anything like that. YOu do have to be carefull with fiber though. I've got 10baset cables that are less than a foot and 100baset cables that are 10. I think there is a restriction (51.2 bittimes) for fast ethernet on the long end but nothing stated as to how short it can be. Tim -Original Message- From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 10:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 100Mbit cable can't shorter than 6 feets? [7:41448] Hi.. everyone, My friend told me that 100Mbit cable can't SHORTER than 6 feets. Have everyone heard that this theory ? If yes, what is the reason or he is bull shitting. Tong == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41460t=41448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Purchase - Pots simulator - Need opin [7:41128]
I bought my teltone tls-4 from ebay for $100. If you keep your eyes peeled, you can get one at a good price. It works very well. I like the fact I can have 3 spokes connected to the hub and do DDR from multiple sites (obviously only 1 at a time). Good luck. Tim -Original Message- From: scott chapin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 8:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Lab Purchase - Pots simulator - Need opinion [7:41128] Hello all - Unfortunately, I do not have funds to go out and buy an ISDN simulator. I have been looking at POTs simulators as a very cheap alternative. I will still be able to do DDR, PPP, etc. Has anyone had any experience with a Viking DLE-200. It goes for around $135.00. Check out this url - watch the word wrap... http://www.TWAcomm.com/Catalog/Dept_ID_108.htm?SID=30TSQJUWWJD58NH8URLJMR7T7 BD4DH75 Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you. Scott Chapin, CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41143t=41128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bonehead move [7:40991]
Edward, could you possibly take your flash card to your local cisco office and see if'll they'll throw a valid catos image on it. If they can't, what about your local cisco reseller. I'm sure they'll be happy to help a person that has boxes like that in their home lab. Heck, I put an ad in my local newspaper looking for a study partner in my city (of 200k people) and found someone that has about the same amount of equipment. And here I thought I was the only one in my hick town with that kinda gear. tim -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: bonehead move [7:40991] If all else fails, I'll send you a flash card. Let me know if you need it(assuming you dont get something else) Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edward Sohn Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bonehead move [7:40991] hey all i was trying to upgrade my flash on my Cat5/SupIII to the latest version, when I decided to delete the old flash first...well, ater rebooting--DUH--the Cat booted into rommon mode...i didn't have an image on file, and i couldn't do an xmodem via rommon mode, because the CCO site says i have to have version 5 rommon or later, which i don't (4.2). thus, according to the CCO site, the only ways to restore an image is to (1) use a flash card with an image (which i don't have); (2) install a flash chip with the image already on it; or (3) upgrade the ROM to version 5 and do an xmodem via the console port. ugggh...i knew i was reckless going into this, but i guess i didn't think ahead enough...anyway, i'm just sending this out in hopes that one of you has encountered this situation before and has a solution...otherwise, i gotta dig into the pockets again... please help... thanks, eddie _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41000t=40991 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem to configure IS-IS [7:41139]
c3640-d-mz.122-6.bin -- is the version your running which is IP/IPX/AT/DEC In order to suppose IS-IS, you need the enterprise version, or with regards to your 3640, enterprise plus c3640-js-mz.122-6.bin --- would be the filename you want. Hope that helps. Tim -Original Message- From: nntp.groupstudy.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem to configure IS-IS [7:41139] Hi, Group, I am trying to configure IS-IS at CCIE lab, and two of my router did not allow me to get into the IS-IS router mode. I wonder if anyone can tell me what the problem is. See following router output: Thanks Ruihai IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3640-D-M), Version 12.2(6), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) System image file is flash:c3640-d-mz.122-6.bin cisco 3640 (R4700) processor (revision 0x00) with 27648K/5120K bytes of memory. R1-3600#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. R1-3600(config)#router isis R1-3600(config)# R1-3600(config)# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41142t=41139 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ping times? Am i missing something [7:41144]
The other day while troubleshooting an issue, I saw some pings from out Tivoli Netview box and it was showing ping times in the 15,000+ ms range. Is this possible? I though there was a limit on this particular field in the head. If an of our frame-format experts (Priscilla?) or sniffer gurus (again... Priscilla?), could point me someone I'd appreciate it. Thanks a bunch! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41144t=41144 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40890]
Thanks for the quick response guys. Found a faulty mx extender between the 6509 and the 3524. Does the 3524 support pagp? I did receive a message from David mentioning something about having the 6509 being set to negotiate the dot1q. I'll have to look into this a little more. Anyone one else a lot of problems with these extenders as well as aobut 3-5% of all gbic's we put into production fail. Again, thanks for the help! Tim -Original Message- From: Ouellette, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 7:55 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions Team, can anyone help out. I am seeing the following messages on one of our 6509's. Port 7/2 is connected via fiber to a 3524 closet switch. We've tried replacing the gbic's on both the 6509 and 3524. The port keeps going from connected state to non-connect stat and the trunk port messages underneath is what we see. Can anyone offer any suggestions? distribution 6509 port 7/2 -fiber- cisco3524 2002 Apr 08 22:26:26 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:26:52 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:19 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:23 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:28 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk distribution6509 (enable) sh port 7/2 Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type - -- -- -- -- - 7/2 Tk1382014101-0/1 notconnect 1full 1000 1000BaseSX Port Security Violation Shutdown-Time Age-Time Max-Addr Trap IfIndex - - - --- 7/2 disabled shutdown 001 enabled 95 Port Num-Addr Secure-Src-Addr Age-Left Last-Src-Addr Shutdown/Time-Left - - - -- 7/2 0 -- -- - _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40890t=40890 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40876]
usmdlz1329000101 (enable) sh trunk 7/2 * - indicates vtp domain mismatch Port Mode Encapsulation StatusNative vlan --- - --- 7/2 on dot1q not-trunking 1 Port Vlans allowed on trunk 7/2 1,224-227,1001-1005,1025-4094 Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain 7/2 1 Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned 7/2 usmdlz1329000101 (enable) clear trunk 7/2 2-223,228-1000 set trunk 7/2 on dot1q 1,224-227,1001-1005,1025-4094 Is the on mode okay? Tim -Original Message- From: David C Prall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40876] Tim, This should do it for you http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html It appears that you didn't disable trunk negotiation on the 6500. Since the 3500XL doesn't support DTP you are having trouble. David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of yangchun Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 6509 trunk to 3524? Any suggestions [7:40876] 3524 .try it. Ouellette, Tim wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Team, can anyone help out. I am seeing the following messages on one of our 6509's. Port 7/2 is connected via fiber to a 3524 closet switch. We've tried replacing the gbic's on both the 6509 and 3524. The port keeps going from connected state to non-connect stat and the trunk port messages underneath is what we see. Can anyone offer any suggestions? distribution 6509 port 7/2 -fiber- cisco3524 2002 Apr 08 22:26:26 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:26:52 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:19 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:23 %DTP-5-NONTRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become non-trunk 2002 Apr 08 22:30:28 %DTP-5-TRUNKPORTON:Port 7/2 has become dot1q trunk distribution6509 (enable) sh port 7/2 Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type - -- -- -- -- - 7/2 Tk1382014101-0/1 notconnect 1full 1000 1000BaseSX Port Security Violation Shutdown-Time Age-Time Max-Addr Trap IfIndex - - - --- 7/2 disabled shutdown 001 enabled 95 Port Num-Addr Secure-Src-Addr Age-Left Last-Src-Addr Shutdown/Time-Left - - - -- 7/2 0 -- -- - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40891t=40876 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP question [7:40525]
This can be simplified in the following way. If you want your internal routers to be able to make a routing decision based on an external bgp route that is somewhere on the net that I'd think your internal router (3660) has to have that route in it's routing table (maybe redistributed into some IGP from BGP). Maybe not the best way. Or, you could inject default routes from each BGP speaker (your 7200's) into your IGP. If let's say one of your 3600's send a packet to it's default gateway (one of the 7200)'s which in turn could pass it over ethernet to the other 7200 if you setup some policy routing etc. I'd say you might want have your 2600/3600's connected to both 7200's for redundancy in case one box completely fails it'll use the other. This could be done be accepting the default routes from each 7200 or by creating a floating static that way if the primary route to the internet fails, it'll use a backup. These are just a couple of ideas. If you provide some specifics of the layout, I may be able to help out a bit more. Also, I'm sure some of the experts here will provide much better detail of how they've implemented such a design. In short, I'm thinking that if you want a 2600/3600 to make a decision on which 7200 to go out of for a specific route, it has to know about it. Tim -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP question [7:40525] If I had 2 7206 routers dual homed to two different ISP's for redundancy, I know I don't NEED the full bgp table, but if I were to accept them for optimal routing within my network, how would I tell my internal routers who don;t run BGP which of the two 7206 routers to go to for a specific route oout to the internet? I assume doing a redistribution into the IGP is a big no-no, so how do small 3600's and 2600's inside the AS know which of the two routers to send the traffic to based on the fact that that one router has the better route? I can think of adding a third 7206 router which would run BGP, connect to the other two routers and accept the full table as well, and the internal routers would use that one as the gateway to the internet, but if I didn't have that third router, is there any other way? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40545t=40525 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Aux Config [7:40126]
Here are my configs from my last scenario where I used two 56ks USR modems hanging off the aux ports on two 2501's with a teltone POTS simulator in between. Hope this helps. You can week out all the other fluff and look at the async1 interface and line aux 0 to get the data you need. Good luck guys/gals! Tim --R3--- r3#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1579 bytes ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug datetime localtime service timestamps log datetime localtime no service password-encryption ! hostname r3 ! enable secret 5 $1$rs3I$itEKzxMxQW5m9zRGHTENz. ! username r2 password 0 cisco ! ! ! ! clock timezone est -5 clock summer-time est recurring ip subnet-zero ip tcp synwait-time 5 no ip domain-lookup ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 190.19.15.49 255.255.255.240 ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial0 ip address 190.19.15.66 255.255.255.192 no fair-queue clockrate 64000 ! interface Serial1 ip address 210.10.10.2 255.255.255.252 clockrate 64000 ! interface Async1 no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer pool-member 32 async default routing ! interface Dialer1 ip address 190.19.15.1 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp dialer pool 32 dialer remote-name r2 dialer idle-timeout 0 either dialer string 101 dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap ! router eigrp 200 network 190.19.0.0 auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! ip classless ip http server ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit alias exec ib sh ip int brief alias exec sr sh run alias exec r sh ip route alias exec bs sh ip bgp summary alias exec b sh ip bgp alias exec cb clear ip bgp * ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous transport preferred telnet line aux 0 exec-timeout 0 0 login local modem InOut modem autoconfigure discovery transport input all stopbits 1 speed 38400 flowcontrol hardware line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 password cisco logging synchronous login ! end ---R2-- r2#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1601 bytes ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug datetime localtime service timestamps log datetime localtime no service password-encryption ! hostname r2 ! enable secret 5 $1$31sZ$4nT29JVXcLNgaJtKs8eT8/ ! username r3 password 0 cisco ! ! ! ! clock timezone est -5 clock summer-time est recurring ip subnet-zero ip tcp synwait-time 5 no ip domain-lookup ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 190.19.15.17 255.255.255.240 ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial0 ip address 190.19.15.130 255.255.255.192 no fair-queue clockrate 64000 ! interface Serial1 ip address 210.10.10.6 255.255.255.252 ! interface Async1 no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer pool-member 23 async default routing async mode interactive ! interface Dialer1 ip address 190.19.15.2 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 0 either dialer pool 23 pulse-time 0 ppp authentication chap ! router eigrp 200 network 190.19.0.0 auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! ip classless ip http server ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit alias exec ib sh ip int brief alias exec sr sh run alias exec r sh ip route alias exec bs sh ip bgp summary alias exec b sh ip bgp alias exec cb clear ip bgp * ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous transport preferred telnet line aux 0 exec-timeout 0 0 login local modem InOut modem autoconfigure discovery transport input all autoselect ppp stopbits 1 speed 38400 flowcontrol hardware line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 password cisco logging synchronous login ! end -Original Message- From: Eric Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:50 AM To: Tim Ouellette Subject: Aux Config Tim, Sorry for the offline email. Would you send me your configurations pertaining to the Aux/Modem/DDR. I've been having trouble making it work smoothly. So far I only be able to make one OSPF Demand Circuit scinario work. I do not have an analog line simulator. I'm using FXS to FXS from my 2620. I think it is the voice port attributs to my problem. I have looked CCO for the debug ppp negotiation and they mentioned the speed difference on both ends (line aux 0, in my situation). At any rate, I would like to compare with your config. I'm almost to make a purchase on an ISDN simulator if the aux simulator is still not satisfactory. Thak you, Eric and don't forget your modem autoconfigure or to define your chat-scripts etc.. If you encounter stumbling blocks Hongtu, I can send you my configs that I use to to aux to aux with usr 56k modems and a pots simulator. Tim -Original Message- From: Lionel Florit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 10:14 PM To: Hongtu Wang Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AUX config Hongtu, Check cco for AUX to AUX pinout... !Async
RE: 2 types of BPDUs? [7:39865]
They're not refering to the Configuration BPDU and Topology Change BPDU are they. Read Radia Perlman's book entitled Interconnections. It's the bomb! Tim -Original Message- From: x [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2 types of BPDUs? [7:39865] The CID exam requirements state Identify the two types of BPDUs. I can't find a reference to this anywhere. Any idea as to what this means? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards. http://movies.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39890t=39865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Going price of a 2509? [7:39758]
Anyone know what the going price price for a 2509 is? I've looked on ebay but only found the version with the octal cable and the one I have an opportunity to purchase is the 8 port rj45 version. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39758t=39758 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Basic ACL Q [7:39334]
Think you want something like this access-list deny 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 That'll deny everything from 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 -Original Message- From: IT Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 12:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Basic ACL Q [7:39334] Hi everyone, Just wondering how I can block whole range from 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255 using one ACL?? My guess is it shoud be , access-list 90 permit 172.16.0.0 0.240.255.255 ?? Please comment?? Thkx Tom _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39337t=39334 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bgp confederation [7:38630]
BGP peer-groups are in my eyes, strictly used to simplify configurations. Let's say you had 5 peers in the same as, wanted to use the same route-map out, set your next-hop-self and other things. Wouldn't it be easier it just define a peer-group and add each of those neighbors to that group rather than type each of those commands to each neighbor. Saves time and potential for error. As far as conferations go, completely different reason behind those. Guess in short they're meant to save resources on a bgp speaking router as far as peering goes. Same with RR's. Tim -Original Message- From: Eric Waguespack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bgp confederation [7:38630] what is the difference between a bgp confederation and a bgp peer-group? are they both, in addition to route reflectors, all simply used to avoid having to do a full mesh? thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38634t=38630 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Training in Toronto Ontario ? [7:38621]
Someone who had passed their lab a couple of months ago mentioned a training provider in Toronto Ontario Canada. Could you let me know the website of those folks again? Tim Timothy Ouellette EDS - New Business Implementation MS 3B 1075 W. Entrance Drive Auburn Hills, MI 48326 * phone: +01-248-754-7535 * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pager: 888-351-4584 www.eds.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38621t=38621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE lab time in Los Angeles [7:38052]
$220 for an 8 hour timeslot. That about $200 more than i'd pay. Anyone looking for time can look on ebay and all the other recommended labtime providers. Granted, your accessing it remotely but most of them will charge a $10 setup or something like that and will cable per your specs (or whatever lab you happen to be doing) Put it this way. For $220 I can get myself a 2501 off of ebay. Glad to hear you would allow people people to come in and meet yourself. Also, I'm sure most people on here would consider this advertising and that you could possibly be banned for that. This is a study group. I apologize if I seemed offensive but I just got off a 2 hour phone call with a cisco tac engineer who was not up to par with some of the others i've dealt with in the past. Tim -Original Message- From: Seto Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE lab time in Los Angeles [7:38052] I'm trying to convince my company to set up a lab suitable for studying for the CCIE lab here in Los Angeles, CA. I want to gauge the interest in practice lab time. If I set up a lab with the required equipment, who would be interested in buying time slots of lab time? We would offer it for $220 for 8 hour time slots and allow people to come in and meet myself and other people studying for the lab. We could also talk about our experiences with various lab preparation books or courses. Are there interested parties out there? Send me an email if so, Leo Seto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38067t=38052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP issue ??? [7:37730]
Thought bgp had a gotcha where you couldn't start a neighbor relationship based on a static route. I'm fairly confident that I remember this. It could be for ibgp only, or maybe just for ebgp. You may want to take a look Tim -Original Message- From: Scott H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP issue ??? [7:37730] Yes. BGP needs to know how to get to that neighbor and since they are not directly connected or running a common IGP, you need a static route. Stanzin Takpa wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... In the following cisco configuration , Is the static route necessary, either it is ebgp or ibgp? ROUTER-A interface Loopback0 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 ! router bgp 400 neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 400 neighbor 1.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0 ! ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.2 ROUTER-B interface Loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 ! router bgp 400 neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 400 neighbor 2.2.2.2 update-source Loopback0 ! ip route 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.1 Stanzin Takpa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37735t=37730 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: basic OSPF questions [7:37142]
I have a question regarding # 2. let's say both routera and router b are connected and advertising the link between them to router c. The connection from routera to routerc is a 64k frame circuit. The link betwen routerb and routerc is a 64k ISDN (1 b). If routera advertises the network between itself and routerb with a cost of 10, and routerb advertises that same network with a cost of 100. All other things being equal when routerc gets the two updates, he will prefer to take the frame circuit towards routera to get to that network. Why would anyways want this? What if the circuit between routerb and routerc was a backup ISDN that you had to pay extra for to bring up during normal business hours or something like that. I guess it all comes down to what your network is doing. Whether two boxes advertise the same cost to a network is really only dependent upon which path you want to take to get there. If they both advertise the same, you may potentially load balance. If that's not desired, crank up the cost of one of those boxes so it's path is less-desirable. router a --- routerb \/ \ / \/ routerc Was I just rambling? Did that make sense. Tim -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: basic OSPF questions [7:37142] At 08:59 AM 3/4/02, bergenpeak wrote: 2) Must a link cost be the same on for all routers that share the link? Is there a protocol reason for this? Some other reason? I couldn't find anything in RFC 2328 that says that two routers connected to a link MUST agree on the cost. The RFC writers use the term MUST carefully. If it were required, they would put it in the RFC. I think it would be a good idea to make them agree, though Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37195t=37142 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spanning-tree Port problems? Please help [7:35833]
All, have a bunch of closet switch that as soon as we plug it into the network with barely any config but an IP, this is what we get and the box just shuts itself off. I've looked up those messages on cisco and they don't say jack up to open up a cisco tac case! Can you help 00:02:15: ST: FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 - listening 00:02:15: ST: Heard root16-0080.3e63.4ee4 on FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 00:02:15: Supersedes 32768-0005.320b.b5c0 00:02:16: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_1Q_NON_TRUNK: Received 802.1Q BPDU on non trunk FastEthernet0/1 on vlan 1. 00:02:16: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PORT_TYPE: Blocking FastEthernet0/1 on vlan 1. Inconsistent port type. 00:02:16: ST: FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 - blocking 00:02:16: ST: Max-age timer has expired on port FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 00:02:16: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking FastEthernet0/1 on vlan 1. Inconsistent local vlan. 00:02:16: ST: Heard root16-0080.3e63.4ee4 on FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 00:02:16: Supersedes 32768-0005.320b.b5c0 00:02:16: ST: sent Topology Change Notice on FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35833t=35833 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spanning-tree Port problems? Please help [7:35835]
Apologize for my poor english. Late night so far. When I said just shuts itself off i meant it goes into blocking. The only information I found on the cisco said said no other information available and to do a show tech and open a tac case. Tim -Original Message- From: Ouellette, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:11 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Spanning-tree Port problems? Please help All, have a bunch of closet switch that as soon as we plug it into the network with barely any config but an IP, this is what we get and the box just shuts itself off. I've looked up those messages on cisco and they don't say jack up to open up a cisco tac case! Can you help 00:02:15: ST: FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 - listening 00:02:15: ST: Heard root16-0080.3e63.4ee4 on FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 00:02:15: Supersedes 32768-0005.320b.b5c0 00:02:16: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_1Q_NON_TRUNK: Received 802.1Q BPDU on non trunk FastEthernet0/1 on vlan 1. 00:02:16: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PORT_TYPE: Blocking FastEthernet0/1 on vlan 1. Inconsistent port type. 00:02:16: ST: FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 - blocking 00:02:16: ST: Max-age timer has expired on port FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 00:02:16: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking FastEthernet0/1 on vlan 1. Inconsistent local vlan. 00:02:16: ST: Heard root16-0080.3e63.4ee4 on FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 00:02:16: Supersedes 32768-0005.320b.b5c0 00:02:16: ST: sent Topology Change Notice on FastEthernet0/1 vlan 1 _ Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35835t=35835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco mc3810 [7:35269]
hey all. I just bought an mc 3810. What's the going rate for one of these without any modules except the 2 serials and 1 ethernet that it comes with. I'd like to be able to use this in a home lab to do VOIP testing. Can I buy the FXS personality modules or do I need some sort of NM to put those cards into it. Thanks group! Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35269t=35269 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CS-500 terminal server cabling [7:35221]
I have a cs-516, to connect your cs to your router con ports, just use a cisco console cable or if your so inclined to make your own (like I did) the pins are an exact opposite of each other. Such as 12345678 on one end would be 87654321 on the other. Pretty straight forward. Tim -Original Message- From: James Barber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CS-500 terminal server cabling [7:35221] Hallo, I've got a 8 port CS-500 terminal server connected to a bunch of Cisco router console ports and am battling to get the cabling right. Anyone done this before ? Thanks ___ http://www.webmail.co.za the South-African free email service Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35242t=35221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simple OSPF LS database question [7:35170]
Hey all, while listening to the CCIE power session tapes, something just popped into my mind. I understand that each router in an ospf area has to have a complete understanding of the topology. My question is that in my little cheasy drawing here, routera has an interface in area 1 and area 0, and routerb has an interface in both area 0 and area 2. Does routera and routerb have an identical LS database for area 0 but they will have a seperate LS database topology view for area 1 (routera) and area 2(routerb)? Maybe i'm just missing a concept here. Thanks! ---Area 1 (routera) -area 0(routerb) --- area 2 Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35170t=35170 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can the guys disscussing about iBGP behavior post a [7:34600]
I think we're awaiting the original poster's reponse back from TAC to see what they say. Since i'm still at work, I haven't had a chance to set up this scenario yet. When I get home i'll giver a shot. Tim -Original Message- From: Vilsico M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can the guys disscussing about iBGP behavior post a conclusion [7:34594] Let's study together. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34600t=34600 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Undocumented iBGP Behavior (Confirmed by Cisco) [7:34543]
The 2nd router that only has 700 routes in it's routing table that it learned from it's IBGP still has the other 103k routes in it's adj-rib-in from it's ebgp peer right, they are just sitting dormant? So if the other router somehow lost it's ebgp peer, it'll send withdraws to the ibgp peer and the other guy will take over with 104k routes correct? Could you define what you meant buy if an iBGP peer learns that another iBGP peer already has a better route to a specific prefix, it will issue a withdrawl to that peer for the prefix(es). If both of those routers are receiving full routes, and without any other configuration, how would the routes learned from one provider be any better than the other? Thanks and great post! Tim -Original Message- From: W. Alan Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 7:02 PM To: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki Cc: Groupstudy - CCIELAB; Groupstudy - Cisco Certification Subject: Re: Undocumented iBGP Behavior (Confirmed by Cisco) Yes, it does... So, if the Router with 104k routes from iBGP, and eBGP, loses one from his eBGP neighbor, he will issue a withdrawl to the iBGP peer. The iBGP peer will turn around an announce that it has a route to that prefix... I understand why this sounds, on the surface, like a terrible thing. In practice, however, it works very well, and makes a lot of sense. I didn't open the case directly (my co-worker did while I was staring at telnet sessions, and cursing under my breath), and I didn't get a chance to ask if this behavior could be disabled. The case is still open, and I'll find out tomorrow. If there's no switch to turn it off, I'll certainly ask for it to be added. Alan - Original Message - From: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki To: Manny Gonzalez Cc: W. Alan Robertson ; Groupstudy - CCIELAB ; Groupstudy - Cisco Certification Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: Re: Undocumented iBGP Behavior (Confirmed by Cisco) Alan, This router with 700 routes via iBGP does have remaining 103300 routes, but from eBGP, right? Przemek On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 17:33, Manny Gonzalez wrote: Is there a STOP command? Something to let us turn that behaviour off? The way I see it is, if the router with the 104000+ routes suddenly dies, the other router (the one with 700 routes) has to then get all these routes from it's remote-as peer and that could take a while (if never, or until refreshed) Unless I missed something in your email, this is not what would like my routers to behave like... :-)) W. Alan Robertson wrote: Folks, Just to let you know, I ran across what looked like a bug in Cisco's BGP code... Turns out, this is undocumented new behavior. We just deployed a pair of 3640s for one of our customers, for dual-router, dual-homed Internet connectivity. We are taking full tables from Genuity (AS 1), and Worldcom (AS 701). Each router was learning 104,000+ prefixes from each of the external peers, but the iBGP peering was acting really strange. One of the routers was learning the full table from the other, but the second router was only taking like 700 prefixes. When we cleared the internal peer (soft or hard), we could see the whole table being transferred... It would climb as though it were going to learn them all, and then as it approached 100,000 prefixes, it would rapidly drop back down to 700. I debugged the iBGP peer, and saw it issuing withdrawls for all of these routes. We opened a ticket with the TAC, and they initially believed it to be a bug as well. Upon further review, they came back and told us that this was the desired behavior in the newer code (We are running 12.0(20) on these boxes). In order to conserve memory, and processor, if an iBGP peer learns that another iBGP peer already has a better route to a specific prefix, it will issue a withdrawl to that peer for the prefix(es). I spent quite a while second guessing what seemed to be a very simple, straighforward configuration. I have done several near identical deployments in the past. I guess the moral is this: If you know your config is correct, and the router behavior is not what you expect, do not hesitate to call the TAC. I hope they are as helpful on Monday, when I call them from the CCIE Lab in RTP. ;) Regards... Alan _ CCIE Security list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/security.html _ CCIE Security list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/security.html _ CCIE Security list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/security.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34543t=34543 -- FAQ, list
RE: MAJOR OT: Free CCNPtraining for convicts [7:34039]
Normally I don't respond to this type of conversations but this is the first time i've ever heard of a DUI as a misdemeanor. What state are you in? In canada, even if your charged with impaired driving/dui you lose your license for 30 days without even going to court, go to court and you can lose it for a year plus fines/jail time if you've done this before. Just my $0.02 canadian, bout 0.013 usd :) Tim -Original Message- From: David L. Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 5:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MAJOR OT: Free CCNPtraining for convicts [7:34039] Depends on how you define criminal or ex-con. I have been convicted on two traffic related Misdemeanor: DUI and DUR (Driving Under Revocation). I am an ex-con. I spent six days in the county jail for the DUR conviction. Both were over ten years ago. Stupid mistakes at the end of my twenties. So I a record which I am forced to disclose in Employment Applications on a routine basis. Now it is not a crime such as robbery or stealing or any violent crime but I do have a record. Through Complexity there is Simplicity, Through Simplicity there is Complexity David L. Blair - CCNP, CCNA, MCSE, CBE, A+, 3Wizard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34153t=34039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: Transport Input Telnet and Terminal Servers [7:33511]
Are you still going on about this *grin* Sure feels weird being call the someone in your earlier comment of I was in a discussion with someone this weekend regarding terminal server configuration. Hehhehe. The conclusion I came up with is as followings. Let's say your on a router and you ping your ethernet interface. The pings actually goes out on the wire and loops back to test your own interface (obviously loopbacks are different). But I would think that in the concept of a telnet, the reverse telnet goes out on the wire to the far end and then loops back establishing a connection? Also, as an FYI, when a do a transport input all on my terminal server, it substitues transport input LAT MOP TELNET blah blah for me. So the telnet is actually a subset of the ALL parameter.? Did that make any sense or do I need more coffee? Tim -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: Transport Input Telnet and Terminal Servers [7:33511] I think, as is often the case, I wasn't clear enough. Let me try to restate the issue another way. When you connect a terminal server to a console port, the telnet protocol is not operating on that link. That link is a simple async serial terminal session. Because of that, I don't understand why transport input telnet works: the input is *not* telnet, it's async serial! If you telnet to a terminal server and from there do a reverse telnet to a device, your actual telnet session--and I'm being very specific here--stops at the terminal server. The protocol being carried on the async line is *not* telnet. Does that make more sense? Okay, back to the coffee for me... Thanks, John On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Daniel Cotts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: all works because telnet is a subset of all - it is included without being specifically named. Do a show line to determine the mapping of line numbers to ports - then do a show line 1 or whatever. Lots more output! Look on the line that starts Allowed transports We are used to configuring terminal servers with ip host mapping a name to an ip and port. A more bare bones implementation would have us telnet 2002 or whatever port we wished to reach. Try that. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Transport Input Telnet and Terminal Servers [7:33511] I was in a discussion with someone this weekend regarding terminal server configuration and the following issue came up. CCO states that on the terminal server, at the very least transport input telnet needs to be configured, if not transport input all. Why is this? With a terminal server, we are connecting to a console port that has no concept of IP or telnet. You connect to the console port using async serial terminal protocols, *not* telnet. Sure, it may be called Reverse Telnet, but the telnet protocol is not end-to-end; it stops at the terminal server. From the terminal server to the device it is connected to you are simply using async serial. So, why do we need transport input telnet?? We did verify that without this command it will not work. Also, why would the ALL keyword work? As far as I can see, none of the available protocols make any sense in this context. Just curious. Perhaps I'm suffering from a brain cloud today. :-) John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33562t=33511 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: aux port issue [7:33466]
What about modem autoconfigure type discovery syntax may be wrong but you get the idea. G'luck. Tim -Original Message- From: Vincent Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: aux port issue [7:33466] I am trying to guide a customer through an aux port setup. so far, we have the following in the router: line aux 0 password cisco login modem InOut transport input all speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware HOwever,when anyone calls the dial to number, the modem answers, but nothing appears on the screen except a blinking cursor. The terminal session shows a status of connected. I believe the attached modem is a USR 56k v.34 capable. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33477t=33466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bloody bgp to ospf redist [7:33502]
Do both of your routers (r3 and r7) see each other as a neighbor? Can you do a sh ip bgp neigh 133.8.0.21 advertised-routes just to see if r3 is even trying to send those igrp learned routes. Tim -Original Message- From: garry baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bloody bgp to ospf redist Guys, I must be doing somthng really sill here. I have 133.7.7.7/32 loo0 133.33.1.1/30 loo10 R3 133.8.0.21/30 | 133.8.0.22/30 R7 133.8.0.25/30 | 133.8.0.26/30 R2 Between r3 r7 i am running bgp and r7 and r2 i am running igrp. My problem is that i am unable to get the two loopbacks from r3 into the routing table at r2. I have rebooted r7 and they appeared but were possibly down, when i cleared the routing table they dissappeared and haven't come back. Below are the relevant parts of config from r7 r3. Can anyone see where i am stuffing this up? R7 interface Ethernet0 ip address 133.8.0.22 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0 ip address 133.8.0.25 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 no frag-pre-queueing frame-relay interface-dlci 401 ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! router igrp 1 redistribute bgp 1 metric 100 100 100 100 1500 network 133.8.0.0 default-metric 100 100 100 100 1500 ! router bgp 1 no synchronization network 133.8.0.20 mask 255.255.255.252 aggregate-address 133.8.0.0 255.255.0.0 redistribute igrp 1 neighbor 133.8.0.21 remote-as 1 no auto-summary R3 interface Loopback0 ip address 133.7.7.7 255.255.255.255 ! interface Loopback10 ip address 133.33.1.1 255.255.255.252 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 133.8.0.21 255.255.255.252 router bgp 1 no synchronization network 133.7.7.7 mask 255.255.255.255 network 133.33.1.0 mask 255.255.255.252 aggregate-address 133.7.0.0 255.255.0.0 aggregate-address 133.33.0.0 255.255.0.0 neighbor 133.8.0.22 remote-as 1 no auto-summary Garry __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ **Note: CCIE Security list is available. For more information go to: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/security.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33502t=33502 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AUX to AUX dialup [7:32658]
Don't forget the login local command under your aux port. Your configs look very similar to mine that I use at home for connecting two 2501's via aux to aux with a Teletone (tls4) pots simulator. If you still can't get it working, lemme know and i'll fire over my configs to you. Tim -Original Message- From: D'Wayne Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AUX to AUX dialup [7:32658] Hi all I am having a few problem with connecting two 1720 routers for dialin and dial out from the aux port i dial in from nas2 to nas1 here are the config and debug of ppp negotation NAS1#sh ru Building configuration... Current configuration: ! ! Last configuration change at 10:49:00 CST Mon Jan 21 2002 by dwaynes ! NVRAM config last updated at 10:45:00 CST Mon Jan 21 2002 by dwaynes ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname NAS1 ! aaa new-model aaa authentication login default group tacacs+ enable aaa authentication enable default group tacacs+ enable aaa authentication ppp default group tacacs+ local aaa accounting exec default start-stop group tacacs+ aaa accounting commands 15 default start-stop group tacacs+ aaa accounting network default start-stop group tacacs+ aaa accounting connection default start-stop group tacacs+ aaa accounting system default start-stop group tacacs+ ! username NAS2 password 0 ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 25 clock timezone CST 9 30 ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ip host r3 192.168.10.67 ip host r2 192.168.8.2 ! ! ! cns event-service server ! ! process-max-time 200 ! interface Serial0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache shutdown ! interface BRI0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown isdn guard-timer 0 on-expiry accept ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 192.168.10.69 255.255.255.192 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Async5 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer rotary-group 1 async mode dedicated fair-queue 64 16 0 ! interface Dialer1 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer-group 1 peer default ip address pool dial ppp authentication chap ! ip local pool dial 192.168.10.91 ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit any dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 1 tacacs-server host 192.168.10.100 tacacs-server key merlin06 ! line con 0 password 7 030752180500 transport input none line aux 0 modem InOut modem autoconfigure discovery transport input all stopbits 1 speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware line vty 0 4 password 7 01100F175804 ! ntp clock-period 17179467 ntp server 192.168.10.100 no scheduler allocate end NAS1# NAS2#sh ru Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname NAS2 ! ! username dwaynes password 0 merlin06 username NAS1 password 0 merlin06 memory-size iomem 25 ip subnet-zero ! chat-script Dialout ABORT ERROR ABORT BUSY AT OK ATDT T TIMEOUT 45 CONNE CT c ! ! ! ! ! interface Serial0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache shutdown no fair-queue ! interface BRI0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 192.168.10.70 255.255.255.192 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Async5 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer pool-member 1 async default routing ppp authentication pap ! interface Dialer1 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer remote-name NAS1 dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 ppp authentication pap ! ip classless no ip http server ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 modem InOut modem autoconfigure discovery stopbits 1 speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware line vty 0 4 login ! no scheduler allocate end NAS2# NAS1# 00:58:26: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Async5, changed state to up 00:58:26: As5 PPP: Treating connection as a callin 00:58:26: As5 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Passive Open 00:58:26: As5 LCP: State is Listen 00:58:28: As5 LCP: TIMEout: State Listen 00:58:28: As5 LCP: O CONFREQ [Listen] id 59 len 24 00:58:28: As5 LCP:ACCM 0x000A (0x0206000A) 00:58:28: As5 LCP:AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) 00:58:28: As5 LCP:MagicNumber 0x5089FD8A (0x05065089FD8A) 00:58:28: As5 LCP:PFC (0x0702) 00:58:28: As5 LCP:ACFC (0x0802) 00:58:30: As5 LCP: TIMEout: State REQsent 00:58:30: As5 LCP: O CONFREQ [REQsent] id 60 len 24 00:58:30: As5 LCP:ACCM 0x000A (0x0206000A) 00:58:30: As5 LCP:AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) 00:58:30: As5 LCP:MagicNumber 0x5089FD8A (0x05065089FD8A) 00:58:30: As5 LCP:PFC (0x0702) 00:58:30: As5 LCP:ACFC
RE: Largest IOS for 2500 [7:32441]
ahhaha. I just never thought of a endowed 25xx router. Nice friday morning pick-me-up. -Original Message- From: Paul Lalonde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:15 PM To: Kurt Kruegel Cc: Cisco; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Largest IOS for 2500 Easiest way? Type: reload And watch the memory count under the boot ROM banner upon bootup. 14336 is the short handed model. 16384 is the endowed model. Paul - Original Message - From: Kurt Kruegel To: Paul Lalonde Cc: Cisco ; Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:09 PM Subject: Re: Largest IOS for 2500 is there a snappy way to tell the difference ??? sh ver ? serial #'s ? Paul Lalonde wrote: Hi Gord, Keep in mind that some 2500s come with 2MB of memory soldered onboard and some do not. Those that *do* include the 2MB have 16MB usable for IOS (the 2MB onboard is used for buffer I/O). Those that do *not* have the 2MB soldered onboard only have 14MB usable for IOS (2MB is pulled from the 16MB total for buffer I/O). This is why some 2500s support large images while others do not. Hope this helps, Paul - Original Message - From: Cisco To: Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: Largest IOS for 2500 I was reading through the archives to see if very many of you have used the mzmaker to compress the Enterprise IOS for the 2500 series routers, lots of good stuff. I think it was Brian that said he was able to use 12.0.4T Enterprise so I tried it with 8MB Flash and 16MD DRAM and it just keep reloading the router and giving me a Insufficient Memory to boot image message. What Enterprise version is being used in your labs? I have upgraded three of my routers to 16\16 but I was hoping to save a few bucks. TIA Gordon **Note: CCIE Security list is available. For more information go to: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/security.html **Note: CCIE Security list is available. For more information go to: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/security.html **Note: CCIE Security list is available. For more information go to: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/security.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32441t=32441 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advertising loopback interfaces via IGRP. [7:32498]
Rajesh, As far as r4 is concerned, you should see the network as being directly connected via loopback0 in the routing table and not learned from IGRP. Also, I'm wondering why you have IGRP turned on for the 200.0.0.0 network and are resdistributing connected. With just the 200 defined in IGRP, R2 should learned about that network. I think you may be having issues with the have that you have both the network statement for that network and also the redistribution of connected. Try removing the redistribution command. Or maybe i'm completely off, in either case, hopefully others will respond. Tim -Original Message- From: Rajesh Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Advertising loopback interfaces via IGRP. [7:32498] Hi all, The scenario is this : R2R3---R4 R3 is a FR switch between 2 DTE devices R2 and R4. R4 is having a loopback interface, ethernet interface and a serial interface. I am running IGRP 2 on R4 on loopback and serial interfaces. I have not included the ethernet interface in the config. Assume, I have assigned the IP for the loopback as 200.0.0.4/32 The config is this : router igrp 2 net 150.50.0.0 net 200.0.0.0 redis connected default-metric 64 1000 255 1 1500 When I issued sh ip route in R4 : sometimes the loopback interface is advertised as IGRP route properly and sometimes it shows possibly down network. I couldn't seem to get the timings of when it was up and when it is going down. Any insights in this please? Thanks rajesh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32501t=32498 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ospf Router ID Manual Router ID? [7:32056]
It sure helps to nail-down the router-id when playing around with DR/BDR elections or with virtual-links (since you point to the router-id) I believe that bootcamp lab #1 has some gotchas that refer to router-id issues. Not that I spent a ton of time (grin) getting this lab to work only to find out my problem was with how the routers selected their router id's. Ever since then, I like to manual tell the box what router id to use. Did that help? btw, it saves time in pounding your head against the desk because your labs don't work. Also, is router really your last name? Tim -Original Message- From: Steve Router [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ospf Router ID Manual Router ID? Does any one know if assigning the Router ID's in Ospf helps out in ospf or save any time...??? _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com **Note: CCIE Security list is available. For more information go to: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/security.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32056t=32056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: telnet session timeout [7:29028]
Are you talking about how long your telnet session will take before it timesout from no activity or if you fat finger an address and you have to wait for it to keep trying an invalid address. If the latter, try 'ip tcp syn-wait 5' Should work. btw: add that to your ccie lab default config. you'll love it. TIm -Original Message- From: richard beddow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: telnet session timeout [7:29028] I've re-read the original message and I am now not sure what you have done. Just to clarify, this command should be executed on the router you are telneted too, not the one you've telneted from. Sorry of this is obvious but I am not sure by the question. RB. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29121t=29028 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Completely OT: StarWars [7:28204]
And the fact that I spent the couple of moments reading that makes me have what? probably less brain cells.. *grin* -Original Message- From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Completely OT: StarWars [7:28204] Someone has way ttoo mmuuucchhh iiimm ttt hhhnnddd sss. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sasa Milic Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Completely OT: StarWars [7:28204] StarWars episode IV in text mode: telnet to towel.blinkenlights.nl Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28215t=28204 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP Class - Post class update [7:27920]
Team, if you all remember my questions regarding the Mobley BGP class being offered in my area. Well, my 1 week class ended yesterday and all I have to say is WOW!!! We went through 25 labs and a 350 page manual that Larry Mobley (teacher) provided. We were also given a free copy of Halabi's IRA book 2nd edition (bonus). There was 6 people in my class, each group of 2 people had a pod of 5 routers that we used to configure bgp using a IGP of ospf. We advertised multiple networks from each pod and were triple-homed to the ISP background that the teacher maintained. We did everything from as-path filters, filter lists and route-maps (enforcing policies), communities, confederations, route-reflectors, aggregation and covered each and every attribute used in the BGP decision process. As a couple of people had mentioned when I initially asked about this class, it's just great. I can now confirm this and recommend to all of you this class. BTW: Larry will be teaching a CCIE bootcamp type class and he already teaches a myriad of other class (BSCN, CIT, etc) I cannot recommend this guy enough. Shoot him an email to find out when he's offering this class. Take care all. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27920t=27920 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Advanced BGP Class [7:26838]
I'm taking the Computer Data Advanced BGP class next week taught by Larry Mobley. I was wondering if anyone has taken this class and if so what they thought of it. A couple of guys here at EDS have taken it and just loved it and was wondering if that's the global consensus. Anything I should review prior to the class. I'm planning on reviewing the IRA book by Halabi. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26838t=26838 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advanced BGP Class [7:26838]
check out computerdata.com, they're just a cisco training partner that hires mr. mobley. I think the class is $3995 for the week. Not bad if work's paying. Here's some confirmation info from computer data. This is to confirm your seat in the following course: Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Starting on November 26, 2001 Length of class: 5 days Prereq: A good understanding of the operation and configuration of Interior Routing Protocols especially EIGRP and OSPF. This class is intended to introduce students to the concepts and configuration of the Border Gateway Protocol and lead students to an understanding of many of the tools and techniques used in more advanced BGP implementations. All of the configurations and labs will be conducted using Cisco Systems routers. This course will be taught by Larry Mobley, who also developed the course. The Cisco equipment will be accessed remotely. All courses start at 9:00 a.m. on the first day of class. Classes end approximately at 5:00 p.m. with an hour for lunch. We are located at 25786 Commerce Drive, Madison Heights, MI 48071 (Northwest of the I-696 and Dequindre intersection, just West of Lincoln Avenue and North off the I-696 Service Drive). For detailed map see attached. In the event that you need to reschedule or cancel your registration for this course, arrangements must be made at least 30 days prior to the class start date to prevent a charge to your company. Cancellation or rescheduling a class less than 30 days will be charged full course tuition. Thank you for choosing Computer Data, Inc. Please call me if you have any questions at 810-212-1296. -Original Message- From: Lupi, Guy [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Advanced BGP Class [7:26838] Tim, how much was the class, is there a url that you can give me? Sounds interesting. -Original Message- From: Richard Deal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Advanced BGP Class [7:26838] Ouellette, Tim wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm taking the Computer Data Advanced BGP class next week taught by Larry Mobley. I was wondering if anyone has taken this class and if so what they thought of it. A couple of guys here at EDS have taken it and just loved it and was wondering if that's the global consensus. Anything I should review prior to the class. I'm planning on reviewing the IRA book by Halabi. Tim Tim, I have worked with Larry in the past before--he was the first person that I knew of that had developed a 5-day BGP class. At this time Global Knowledge had a 3-day one and Cisco didn't even have one. Having taught for many years, when I saw Larry teach, I knew, hands-down, that he was the best instructor that I had ever seen. You'll really like him and you'll really enjoy the BGP class he developed. If I recall correctly, each BGP router pod has 5 routers which you and a classmate will share. If you are planning for the CCIE, this is a must-have class! One thing that surprised me about your post was that Computer Data was sponsoring the class--Larry used to do his teaching through IMS in Atlanta. I've had problems with IMS in the past (ie, them not paying me money they owed me) and Larry probably ran into the same thing. If you take the class, please tell Larry I said hi! and I'd be curious to find out what he's up to. Best of luck Time! -- __ Richard Deal email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://pages.prodigy.net/richard.deal * Just finished a CCNA ebook available at Boson (www.boson.com): + CCNA Secrets Revealed! * CCNP test author for QuizWare (www.quizware.com) + CCNA #1 and #2 -- 550 questions each! + CCNP Routing #1 -- 500 questions + CCNP Switching #1 -- 500 questions + CCNP Remote Access #1 -- 500 questions + CCNP Support #1 -- 500 questions * Author of the following Coriolis books: + CCNP Switching Exam Cram + CCNP Remote Access Exam Prep + CCNP Cisco Lan Switch Configuration Exam Cram __ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26890t=26838 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Audio Learning [7:24810]
Hey! Maybe we can all chip in and share. After all, I think they $10.00 they're charging is basically just for the media. Have you purchased any of these Karen? Tim -Original Message- From: Karen Young [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Audio Learning [7:24810] Mark, I don't know about audio materials for certification stuff, but there's a site that'll let you order the audio presentations from Networkers 1999, 2000, and 2001. http://recording.safeshopper.com/ HTH, Karen Original Message Last week someone gave a link to certaudio for CDs covering the Cisco material. I tried the url today they are no longer in business it seems. Does anyone know of a company that does audio CDs on Cisco to listen to during a long commute to work? TIA Mark Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24831t=24810 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Router price [7:24537]
Charles, I have a 2523 and just adore it. From what I've found in my home studies is that even a low speed serial is good enough for testing. It's all about routable ports and my 2523 has 8 low speed serials, 2 high-speed serials, a TR port and I think an ISDN too. I paid $800 for my 2523 with 16/16 which at the time was a decent price. I prefer to use that as my frame switch rather than my 4000. It's not like you'll be passing tons of traffic over these links since it would just be in a lab environment so the low-speed serials are good enough. Hope that helped. Tim -Original Message- From: Charles Lin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Off Topic - Router price [7:24537] Thank You Brad! So you suggest that I not take the 4000M right? Even if it cost 400 with all those plugins? I thought it was good though, hehe. Does the lab have a 4000 in it then? (hope it won't violate the NDA). You also said that the 2522 was good for frame switch right? How about a 2520 or a 2521 because it has 4 serials too! Could you help me please? Thanks! From: Brad Ellis Reply-To: Brad Ellis To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Off Topic - Router price [7:24537] Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:02:01 -0500 I'd recommend using the following routers instead for a CCIE lab: 2x 2501s 2x 2503s (for ISDN) 1x 2511 (reverse telnet AS) 2x 2513s (TR/Ether) 1x 2522 (frame-switch) ISDN Simulator Catalyst 5k switch If you still want to add on: 26xx routers with Voice 3900 TR Switch That is usually the formula that I suggest to people trying to build home labs. The 4000s are a pain in the butt to deal with and have given me nothing but problems (hence I dont sell/buy them anymore). Make sure your 25xx routers have 16D/16F so you can run enterprise 12.x IOS. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: www.ccbootcamp.com Charles Lin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello! Someone is going to sell me his routers and wanted to ask if they are a good deal. Please help me and advice me if they are good price. 1.) Cisco 4000M Router with 16/16, 2 Serials Ports, 2 Tokens Rings Ports, and 4 ISDN ports for $400USD. 2.) Cisco 2524 Router with 8/4 flash, 1 module of isdn and 1 module of 56k included for 350$ 3.) Cisco 2516 Router for $449 USD 4.) Cisco 1602 for 200 USD 5.) Cisco 2515 for 425 USD Please tell me which ones are good priced. I am really grateful for your help. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24650t=24537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Difference between Sync and Async - Just a note to you all. [7:24658]
After writing an email to someone else on this groupstudy, I figured i'd share a part of it with the rest of ya. Hopefully it's readable. To sum up the difference between sync and sync communication is this. Asynchronous communication requires each side maintain it's own clocking. Synchronous means that one side will generate clocking as it sends it's data (faster). For some reason, my analogy has always been this. Picture two people dancing the tango. If both of the dancers try to keep their own beat (clock) in their mind by thinking about the rhythm, they'll have more on their mind so they'll be slower to execute the moves = Asynchronous. Now picture the other side. Imagine if one of the dancers just did all the rhythm stuff and kept the beat. The other person would just have to follow. Would be much quicker since the follower is just taking the rhythm from the leader. Ala Synchronous. So, Synchronous is like they're in-step or synchronized to the beat. Hope that makes sense. It was much clearer in my mind before i started describing it. Guess thinking about dancing or something blurred it all up. Tim btw, check out this link if you want more geeky details. http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gorry/eg2069/async.html Timothy Ouellette, Infrastructure Analyst MCSE, CCSE, CCNP/DP EDS - New Business Implementation 1075 W. Entrance Drive Auburn Hills, MI 48326 ( 01-248-754-7535 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pager 888-351-4584 www.eds.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24658t=24658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - good auction seller [7:24468]
Chuck, I too have dealt with Pat McKool. I was also very impressed with the product/service that I received. In the event that I need to buy more equipment, I will definetly give Pat a call. TIm -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Off Topic - good auction seller [7:24468] After some of the recent negative discussion about a particular auction seller ( and thanks - it helped me avoid bidding on certain products ) I thought some folks might be interested in my recent positive experience. Pat McKool of Market Network Solutions, was a pleasure to deal with. If anyone is in the market for used equipment, you might want to keep an eye out for this guy on That Auction Site. NOTE: past performance is no guarantee of future results ;- Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24501t=24468 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do you cats do for motivation? [7:24549]
Man O Man. I'm finding it super-tough to stay motivated with all of this super-duper-heavy-geeky CCIE studying that I have to do. How do you guys keep your mind focused and your eyes straight ahead? I find it really easy to answer my phone on a friday night and talk to my buddies, next thing you know i'm at the local pub forgetting my name. I've got soo many books to ready, and soo man labs that I want to do. The light at the end of the tunnel isn't even close to being visable and it's tough. Can anyone help? btw, anyone used any audio tapes/cd's to listen to cisco type stuff during the commute to work? I was thinking about doing something like that but I think hearing my own voice speak would be enough to drive me insane. Any thoughtS? Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24549t=24549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What do you cats do for motivation? [7:24549]
Feels weird to reply to myself. Found this cool poster online, thought it may help some of you. http://www.autotrend.com/9211.html -Original Message- From: Ouellette, Tim [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What do you cats do for motivation? [7:24549] Man O Man. I'm finding it super-tough to stay motivated with all of this super-duper-heavy-geeky CCIE studying that I have to do. How do you guys keep your mind focused and your eyes straight ahead? I find it really easy to answer my phone on a friday night and talk to my buddies, next thing you know i'm at the local pub forgetting my name. I've got soo many books to ready, and soo man labs that I want to do. The light at the end of the tunnel isn't even close to being visable and it's tough. Can anyone help? btw, anyone used any audio tapes/cd's to listen to cisco type stuff during the commute to work? I was thinking about doing something like that but I think hearing my own voice speak would be enough to drive me insane. Any thoughtS? Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24557t=24549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT- maybe... [7:24121]
Tim -Original Message- From: Nuurul Basar Mohd Baki [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 6:20 AM To: 'Ouellette, Tim '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' Subject: RE: OT- maybe... [7:24121] Hai, Can you give me the url for this WUG product. Thanks Nuurul Basar -Original Message- From: Ouellette, Tim To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/26/01 8:28 AM Subject: RE: OT- maybe... [7:24121] What's Up Gold (WUG) isn't that bad and it's much cheaper. It's just a pinging machine to see if stuff is still up. I'm not sure if you meant CW or maybe Netview or Openview. Did you want to find a tool that has a map and shows you when things go down as turning red and generating an alert of sorts? Or did you want to capture snmp traps for config changes? Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:OT- maybe... [7:24121] Hi All, Besides Cisco Works, anyone know of any good Cisco monitoring apps? I am looking to monitor my routers, VPN and switches. Thanks, Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24242t=24121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT- maybe... [7:24121]
grr, Url got snipped. check out whatsupgold.com Tim -Original Message- From: Nuurul Basar Mohd Baki [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT- maybe... [7:24121] Hai, Can you give me the url for this WUG product. Thanks Nuurul Basar -Original Message- From: Ouellette, Tim To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10/26/01 8:28 AM Subject: RE: OT- maybe... [7:24121] What's Up Gold (WUG) isn't that bad and it's much cheaper. It's just a pinging machine to see if stuff is still up. I'm not sure if you meant CW or maybe Netview or Openview. Did you want to find a tool that has a map and shows you when things go down as turning red and generating an alert of sorts? Or did you want to capture snmp traps for config changes? Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:OT- maybe... [7:24121] Hi All, Besides Cisco Works, anyone know of any good Cisco monitoring apps? I am looking to monitor my routers, VPN and switches. Thanks, Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24264t=24121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DTE/DCE explanation please [7:24071]
Sam, the whole DTE/DCE thing is related directly to where the clocking comes from. In a typical wan, the clocking to your router's serial port comes from an external CSU/DSU that your carrier may provide. Therefor, the carried is the DCE and your router is the DTE. In a home environment, if you have your routers connected via a db60-db60 cable, one of those routers needs to supply the clock rate. Check your cable because one end is probably labelled as DCE and the other DTE. If it's not, trying using the show controller serial x and that should tell you the type that is plugged into it. On the DCE side of that connected link, you need to use the clock rate command to supply clocking to the other side. I don't think there is a DTE cable I believe it's more of you order the proper pin size (db60 on 2500's and db60 or db50 on the 4000's) for each side. Hope that helps. Tim -Original Message- From: Sam Deckert [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DTE/DCE explanation please [7:24071] Hello, Could someone kindly explain the whole DTE / DCE thing in relation to setting up a home lab and using routers back to back? I believe that DTE is male and DCE female, but what are the other differences? When connecting a router to a CSU/DSU, would you always order a DTE cable? Thanks for any help anyone can provide! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24089t=24071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAC address and VLANs [7:23950]
Caroll, I just love the little jokes and grunts you throw into your messages. Makes reading technical stuff fun to read when you can just picture the person writing it going UGH in the middle of a paragraph. Thanks for making the reading fun *grin* Tim -Original Message- From: Carroll Kong [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MAC address and VLANs [7:23950] At 08:32 PM 10/24/01 -0700, Chuck Larrieu wrote: interesting points, and well taken. if one takes VLANs to be synonymous with subnets then sure. your 10.0.0.0/16 thought reminds me of the good old days when the Xylan marketing team was out hawking their flatten the network religion. In this respect I am a traditionalist - route where you can, and bridge where you must. yeah, I keep forgetting that Windows does some broadcasting, but recall that I come out of the brokerage industry, where broadcast was a necessity. How else would quote machines work? Upwards of 80-90% of our LAN traffic during market hours was broadcast. So how much broadcast traffic can a couple hundred windoze boxes really create, and just how badly does that really effect network performance? Particularly if you are running a fully switched environment, or even in a hubbed environment, assuming 12-24 port hubs? When I was young and foolish, I ran my network on daisy chained 48 port hubs, and I think I got up to around 125 stations and printers before I regretted my foolishness. This was in that self same brokerage firm, with the outrageous broadcast traffic. I know a Major Bank where they at one time ran segments of 700-100 end stations. And survived to a certain degree. ( although they were the masters of broadcast control :- ) As I said, your points are well taken. the application drives most things, but the architecture surely drives others. thanks. Chuck Well, I admit, my response was a bit clouded by the fact that one of our clients recently requested a redesign of their flat beyond flat network. Call it justification! They are using, UGH, 10BaseT Hubs with some nasTY (with an iintentional capital T and Y), daisy chaining hub action, which REALLY exacerbated performance loss.Not to mention it's all Bay GEAR! Evil! :) Admittedly, that IS changing the premise of Priscilla's original statement. The network I am working on is HARDLY the epitome of the modern day model system Priscilla described. I am guessing with solid switches across the board, it might very well be pretty darn good in terms of performance. I was just curious where the new practical bar was raised to. If the situation is with 10BaseT hubs, I would not be surprised if performance is really becoming an issue where broadcasts become a percentage of your daily bandwidth. Where broadcasts are probably far more often being that even unicast packets are broadcasted on the wonderous layer 1 repeater technology known as hubs. With all switches, I am not too sure I can say clearly otherwise, but I was just wondering how far is a practical limit in today's modern systems? On top of that, yes, all in moderation. If we take either approach to the extreme, we clearly see significant flaws. No one wants to run subnets of 2 usable hosts each for their entire network and smash their catalyst 6509 with routing modules to oblivion. No one wants to run the 30,000 flat network from HecK. (Ok, maybe some people do...) Look Ma, no routers! On the side, you just noticed your statement impies that some would run multiple VLANs with a single subnet? I guess you would depend on having at least one port on both VLANs to get interconnectivity? Would that be like bridging? (unifying two layer 2 networks). Her statements on the windows protocol seem correct. Ugh, I got to whip out the old sniffer again. Or read up again. I could have sworn I STILL saw a multitude of crap flying every second on my old college network even after we went to a switch. I should try again since her points seem quite valid. Hm. Although broadcasting was necessary, in the more extreme case, does it make sense for a quote server to broadcast to another quote server? There is a small subsegment of don't cares for the quotes, it seems like multicast is more ideal, but probably not necessary. No matter, I am sure the demigods of broadcast control had a working solution. :) -Carroll Kong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24092t=23950 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DTE/DCE explanation please [7:24071]
Welcome. I use the db60-db60 in my home lab to connect my 2500's. Check on ebay, they go for about 20 bucks. Check out the following link for pinouts, you can make your own but the pins are darn small (take my word on it) http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/service/knowledge/pinouts/ Watch the wrap, if any. with the v.35 cables, one end would be dce and the other dte. Just be carefull which end is which. db60--V.35 | V.35 db60 | | | | DTE DCE DCE DTE If that's what your refereing to then I don't think it'll work due to both far ends being DTE's. Lemme know if you have any more questions. I had to discover this stuff out the hardware way so maybe I can advise a little more. Tim -Original Message- From: Sam Deckert [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:23 AM To: Ouellette, Tim Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DTE/DCE explanation please [7:24071] Thanks Tim, that was great! So, a special db60-db60 cable can be used for back-to-back connections, and will work as long as one router is set to be the DCE and provide a clockrate. Does this cable have any special pinouts or anything? Is there a diagram somewhere? Did a search on google, no luck tho! Also, would a setup with two V.35 cables (one male, one female) connected together between two routers work in the same way? Thanks for your help! Sam. - Original Message - From: Ouellette, Tim To: Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:49 PM Subject: RE: DTE/DCE explanation please [7:24071] Sam, the whole DTE/DCE thing is related directly to where the clocking comes from. In a typical wan, the clocking to your router's serial port comes from an external CSU/DSU that your carrier may provide. Therefor, the carried is the DCE and your router is the DTE. In a home environment, if you have your routers connected via a db60-db60 cable, one of those routers needs to supply the clock rate. Check your cable because one end is probably labelled as DCE and the other DTE. If it's not, trying using the show controller serial x and that should tell you the type that is plugged into it. On the DCE side of that connected link, you need to use the clock rate command to supply clocking to the other side. I don't think there is a DTE cable I believe it's more of you order the proper pin size (db60 on 2500's and db60 or db50 on the 4000's) for each side. Hope that helps. Tim -Original Message- From: Sam Deckert [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DTE/DCE explanation please [7:24071] Hello, Could someone kindly explain the whole DTE / DCE thing in relation to setting up a home lab and using routers back to back? I believe that DTE is male and DCE female, but what are the other differences? When connecting a router to a CSU/DSU, would you always order a DTE cable? Thanks for any help anyone can provide! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24096t=24071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IP database application [7:24128]
wordpad? Sorry, couldn't resist. -Original Message- From: Gibb, Jake [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IP database application [7:24128] Does anyone have a good app for maintaining IP address information besides excel or notepad? Jake Gibb Kroll Senior Network Engineer 615.345.9880 (Office) 615.394.7887 (Cell) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24136t=24128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT- maybe... [7:24121]
What's Up Gold (WUG) isn't that bad and it's much cheaper. It's just a pinging machine to see if stuff is still up. I'm not sure if you meant CW or maybe Netview or Openview. Did you want to find a tool that has a map and shows you when things go down as turning red and generating an alert of sorts? Or did you want to capture snmp traps for config changes? Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT- maybe... [7:24121] Hi All, Besides Cisco Works, anyone know of any good Cisco monitoring apps? I am looking to monitor my routers, VPN and switches. Thanks, Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24138t=24121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow wan link. TCP traffic ok, UDP not okay. Please help! [7:24006]
Yeah, try copying a 12 meg msfc .bin over a WAN link that has latency of 125ms. So I only get to send 8 packets per seccond each as 512 bytes. (1000ms/125ms = 8) tftp at the application layer is the one who sends the acks. For some reason I can't do a a copy flash ftp. I'm guessing because I don't have anonymous login allowed on my ftp? Does that sound right? Tim -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Slow wan link. TCP traffic ok, UDP not okay. Please help! [7:23853] validating this thought, I have had reason to upgrade my router pod IOS images of late. Cisco's router Software Loader uses TFTP to copy new images into flash via a direct ehternet to ethernet connection. copying 16 meg images takes an inordinate amount of time, especially considering there are only two devices on the network involved. it would appear, then, that the router writes each packet to flash before requesting the next packet. at least that goes a long way towards explaining why the copies take several minutes on a 10baseT link with just the two devices connected via a crossover cable. thanks for the insight Chuck Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... One more (serious!) comment. I asked a protocol guru about the question of TFTP being so slow. He agreed with the poster that the TFTP throughput seems awfully low, but he agreed with me too that TFTP is not optimized for throughput. He also mentioned one other stupidity with TFTP implementations. He said that some actually write the 512-byte block of data to the hard disk before ACKing and asking for the next block. So a slow hard disk would cause problems. TFTP and UDP don't have a PSH bit like TCP has. With TCP, the sender would output a bunch of data and then perhaps set the PSH bit which would tell TCP to give the data (in RAM) to the application. At that point, you might see a short hiccup as FTP wrote the data to the hard drive (not necessarily because FTP could still keep the data in memory until the session is closed; it's implementation-dependent.) TFTP is also implementation-dependent, but with some implementations, it's one block at a time that is written to storage and then ACKed before more data is sent. Since FTP works well, you have proof that the problem isn't with the network. Can't you pass this onto the server or application people!? ;-) Priscilla At 02:34 PM 10/18/01, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: At 02:23 PM 10/18/01, Ouellette, Tim wrote: Priscilla, Thanks for the response. Any idea as to why the TFTP protcol over our WAN will run at 4k/sec and FTP at 165k/sec. I just figured that the smaller packet size of UDP would help. Nope. That would not help. It would make the throughput worse. I also thought that UDP is connectionless and thefor requires no ACKS. TFTP has ACKs. Other sites on our WAN I can transfer large files via TFTP and they run at very good speeds. Have you done the same sort of comparison of FTP versus TFTP at those sites. I bet FTP has much better throughput. I'm just concerned about this one site. Any other ideas? See the message from Phil Barker. It made some good points about TFTP and UDP in general not being tuned for WANs. The next step would be to put a Sniffer on it and see what's really happening. But there may not be anything abnormal happening. TFTP just kinda sucks. Tim -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Slow wan link. TCP traffic ok, UDP not okay. Please help! [7:23391] This list either filters my answers or mangles them. I'll make another try here. It it comes out mangled again, I'll post it somewhere on my Web site when I have time. TFTP is a trivial protocol running on top of a trivial protocol (UDP). You shouldn't expect it to have good throughput. TFTP uses a block size of 512 bytes. The protocol is a command/reply (Ping-Pong protocol) with no windowing, flow control, etc. The protocol looks like this: Write Request- If there are any problems, the application-layer TFTP notices a missing ACK and retransmits. FTP, on the hand uses TCP. It looks more like: SYN my segment (packet size) is 1500 SYN ACK my segment size is also 1500 ACK GET (FTP command), TCP receive window is 8,192 (or whatever)- Hey All. I was wondering if someone could help me out with a problem i'm working on. It's very weird to me and I ca
RE: WAY OT: Cache Server Comparison [7:23805]
John, Have you taken a look at Network Applicate netcache boxes. Btw: if you ever need load balancers, take a hard look at F5's Big IP Load Balancers. Excellent features and the GUI is just plan bad a$$. Wouldn't trade our 64 of them for anything (well, maybe a new house for myself, that's about it) Tim -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WAY OT: Cache Server Comparison [7:23805] Sorry for posting this far off-topic but I knew I could get some great answers here. We're replacing our cache server and we're considering a couple of options, primarily the Z-50 from Stratacache and the F5 EdgeFX. My boss at this point won't consider the F5 product unless it participates in this month's Cache Bake-Off. It is running Inktomi software and apparently products running Inktomi cache software never participate in bake-offs. Do any of you have any experience or hard statistics related to these cache engines? It appears to me that the F5 product is superior but I'm not having much luck proving that. Thanks, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23809t=23805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
link speed divided by 800 rule? [7:23504]
Has anyone heard of the link speed divided by 800 rule? for determing MTU's. While going through the Global Knowledge VOIP class, they mention the following Small, medium, and large sites use 80, 160, and 320 byte fragment sizes respectively, based on the link speed divided by 800 rule. This fragmentation is configured with the ip mtu command on the serial interface. Use FRF.12 for data fragmentation instead, if it is available in your IOS release. I was just wondering if someone could define it briefly. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23504t=23504 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slow wan link. TCP traffic ok, UDP not okay. Please help! [7:23345]
Hey All. I was wondering if someone could help me out with a problem i'm working on. It's very weird to me and I can't find any reason why this may be happening other than possible a Queuing issue. Please comment. I've done some testing to show the response issues from spikinisse to an auburn hills tftp/ftp box. When a 9 meg file is copied from one of the 6509's in Spijkenisse using tftp we see a speed of 4k/sec (9041904 bytes copied in 2251.956 secs (4016 bytes/sec) However, when I ftp'd a 2meg file from a server in Spijkenisse to the same server in Auburn Hills, I see a speed of 166k/sec (2024013 bytes sent in 12 seconds (166.12 Kbytes/s) Seeing as in Spijkinisse it is approximately 8pm and they have 4 E1's, there should not be an issue with over-utilization. It intrigue's me as to how a UDP based application (tftp) can have such a ridiculously slow speed of 4k/sec and a TCP based application (ftp) has an average speed (considering 4 e1's) of 166k/sec. Spikinisse has a group of E1's to the cloud and our site in Auburn Hills has a full DS3 to the cloud. Spik is in the Netherlands, and Auburn Hills is in the US. Any more information I need to provide? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23345t=23345 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow wan link. TCP traffic ok, UDP not okay. Please help! [7:23405]
Priscilla, Thanks for the response. Any idea as to why the TFTP protcol over our WAN will run at 4k/sec and FTP at 165k/sec. I just figured that the smaller packet size of UDP would help. I also thought that UDP is connectionless and thefor requires no ACKS. Other sites on our WAN I can transfer large files via TFTP and they run at very good speeds. I'm just concerned about this one site. Any other ideas? Tim -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Slow wan link. TCP traffic ok, UDP not okay. Please help! [7:23391] This list either filters my answers or mangles them. I'll make another try here. It it comes out mangled again, I'll post it somewhere on my Web site when I have time. TFTP is a trivial protocol running on top of a trivial protocol (UDP). You shouldn't expect it to have good throughput. TFTP uses a block size of 512 bytes. The protocol is a command/reply (Ping-Pong protocol) with no windowing, flow control, etc. The protocol looks like this: Write Request- If there are any problems, the application-layer TFTP notices a missing ACK and retransmits. FTP, on the hand uses TCP. It looks more like: SYN my segment (packet size) is 1500 SYN ACK my segment size is also 1500 ACK GET (FTP command), TCP receive window is 8,192 (or whatever)- Hey All. I was wondering if someone could help me out with a problem i'm working on. It's very weird to me and I can't find any reason why this may be happening other than possible a Queuing issue. Please comment. I've done some testing to show the response issues from spikinisse to an auburn hills tftp/ftp box. When a 9 meg file is copied from one of the 6509's in Spijkenisse using tftp we see a speed of 4k/sec (9041904 bytes copied in 2251.956 secs (4016 bytes/sec) However, when I ftp'd a 2meg file from a server in Spijkenisse to the same server in Auburn Hills, I see a speed of 166k/sec (2024013 bytes sent in 12 seconds (166.12 Kbytes/s) Seeing as in Spijkinisse it is approximately 8pm and they have 4 E1's, there should not be an issue with over-utilization. It intrigue's me as to how a UDP based application (tftp) can have such a ridiculously slow speed of 4k/sec and a TCP based application (ftp) has an average speed (considering 4 e1's) of 166k/sec. Spikinisse has a group of E1's to the cloud and our site in Auburn Hills has a full DS3 to the cloud. Spik is in the Netherlands, and Auburn Hills is in the US. Any more information I need to provide? Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23405t=23405 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TCP TURN? [7:22083]
Does anyone know what a TCP Turn is? I've heard this mentioned on a couple of conference calls i've been on lately and I can't seem to find out much information on it. Not sure if maybe it's a non-technical term used for a syn-ack type deal or what. Can anyone shed some light on this? Thanks a bunch! Tim Timothy Ouellette, Infrastructure Analyst MCSE, CCSE, CCNP/DP EDS - New Business Implementation 1075 W. Entrance Drive Auburn Hills, MI 48236 ( 01-248-754-7535 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pager 888-351-4584 www.eds.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22083t=22083 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Aux port - Dialer setup question [7:21088]
Robert, having done this exact same setup in my CCIE lab using a teltone POTS simulator I can verify that this can be done. You were right on in asking about the async port. That will be the physical interface to your dialer1. Your basical config may look something like this interface async1 ip unnumbered ethernet0 no ip directed-broadcast encap ppp no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache async mode dedicated fair-queue 64 16 0 no cdp enable ppp authentication chap Check out this link as it provides a lot of information for DDR. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12supdoc/dsq cg3/qcddr.htm#xtocid60145 Watch the wrap. Tim -Original Message- From: Robert Fowler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Aux port - Dialer setup question [7:21088] While studying for my BCRAN test, I decided to test some of what I learned however I think I may have hit a bump. I think the problem is you can't put an aux port into a dialer pool because it doesn't have a physical interface. However for the purpose of this exercise I let you in on what I have attempted. I have 2 routers, I have a modem connected to each aux port. The 2 routers have a link between them, if that link goes down I want 1 router to call the 2nd and establish a connection using the aux ports. Do I have to have an asynch port in order to accomplish this? Thank You, Robert Fowler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21124t=21088 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question and also some information too - VoIP [7:21183]
What is the default interval between pings from a 6509 w/msfc? The reason I ask is that I just got an email from a cisco tac dude. We're having issues at one of our sites where we can only ping a Cisco 7960 IP phone 60% of the time. This is true when pings are performed from the core 6509 switch/router. When I goto the access layer device which is just a 6509 with no msfc, the pings are 100% successful. When I ping from the callmanager, 100% replies. The cisco tac guy said that the IP phones will not respond to more than one ping per 10ms for security reasons?. The weird part about this is that the phones that are not working are running a new version of code ( load =P003D310) and the phones that are working are running P003Q301. Therefor, new code = 60% ping, old load = 100% ping. Ping from MSFC = 60%, ping from anywhere else including access switch the phone is connected to or ping from any other pc and it works 100% Can anyone shed some light please? Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21183t=21183 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serial is reset? [7:20255]
After look at some of the t1's in one of my boxes. I see the following Serial2/0:23 is reset, line protocol is down After looking on cisco, I couldn't find an exact description of what this means. Can anyone provide some insight? May god have mercy on the souls of those who betray him. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20255t=20255 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: configuring bridge on router [7:19936]
The 1 in your question refers to the bridge-group number cisco.com -- Assigns a bridge group number and defines a Spanning Tree Protocol as IEEE802.1D standard, DEC or VLAN bridge I believe that in an TRB environment, you'd want both routers to have the same bridge number for STP to work correctly. I hope i'm steering you in the right direction. Tim -Original Message- From: mak [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: configuring bridge on router [7:19936] Hi All, I would like to know if I configure: bridge 1 protocol ieee Is it any special meaning for the 1? I configure the bridging between two routers like this PC R1 R2 PC I configure bridge 1 for R1 and bridge 2 for R2. But the PC can browse each other by NetBEUI. Is it this identifier number nothing special? or is there any special function? Thank a lot mak Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19944t=19936 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Concert Frame Relay - ? [7:19276]
Can anyone explain what Concert Frame Relay (CRFS) is? Is there a difference between it and the standard Frame Relay ? If someone could shed some light on this, or even point me to a place where I can do some more reading I would be grateful. Thanks Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19276t=19276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terminal Server/Digiboard [7:18422]
Good morning group. After many attempts (and subsequent failures) at trying to configure my xyplex terminal server, I've put it aside and looked at other alternatives. I didn't want to spend the $800 or so on a 2509-2511 or $350 on a cisco 500. I was wondering if anyone had ever used a digiboard to add 4 more com ports to a pc. I was looking at using such a beast in my home CCIE lab and thought you good folks might know of some caveats to doing so. Thanks for your time. Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18422t=18422 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: network i.d. [7:17566]
Were you refering to the NET ID as in Network Entity Title. In which case 47.0004.004D.0003..0C00.62E6.00 as an example would be the Domain ID, Area ID, Station ID and selector bit. Is that what your looking for? Tim -Original Message- From: jo carol [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: network i.d. [7:17566] hi I had this question on a test: What is the network i.d a)the network and mac address B)the network and host thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17574t=17566 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN DDR/CCIE [7:17524]
Group, I see that there has been a couple discussions of ISDN DDR. I just thought i'd let you guys/gals know how I've done DDR in my home lab. Went out to ebay and bought a couple of USR 33.6 External modems, a teltone (tls-4) POTS simulator, and used a couple crossover cables and an adapater or two. This type of setup is very simple, easy to wire, and from what i've done so far, it works great. Mind you, I can't configure ISDN Spid's or switch-types but I do get to use modem configuration and chat-scripts so it's a balance. Instead of configuring a bri with a dialer, i use a async with a dialer. Not a big deal. The price of the two modems was about $18 shipped. The Teltone TLS-4 was $125 and I made the cables and had some spare db25 to rj45 adapters (to plug the rj45 into the modems) I think this is a great idea for anyone going for the CCIE and wanted to get good at DDR, snapshot routing, or just using old-school 33.6 modems *grin* Take care all! Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17524t=17524 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HElP! Xyplex terminal server. [7:17384]
Good monday morning all! I recently purchased a Xyplex 1600 Series terminal server. The box cost me $30 without a flash card. Supposedly I can load it via the network with a rarp/bootp server. Anyone know a working rarp/bootp server? I tried to force down the OS with hyperterm but was unsuccessful and the only output I see from the xyplex box is requesting network load and I can't seem to send down the OS to it. Has anyone here in this group ever worked with such a device and had it load successfully? If anyone has any hints, please let me know. Thanks all! Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17384t=17384 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test [7:17138]
test Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17138t=17138 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test again [7:17143]
Sorry about this. Trying to get the mailing list working at work. grrr Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17143t=17143 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
