On 7/8/24 16:46, Mischief via agora-business wrote,:
> On 7/8/24 9:01 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> Please increase the complexity of the office to 1, if there is ever a
>> redraft. Otherwise, I'll petition the ADoP later, so its ok.
> I didn't include it in the proposal because
how about a dodging mechanic? give everyone a speed value, or perhaps
they can buy bulletproof vests?
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 19:33, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 4:04 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> >
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 4:04 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I don't think that requiring 2 Bangs to kill someone will necessarily slow
> down the game once the match starts. We've seen that players (others and
> myself) can easily use
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:34 AM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 06:55 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> > A ghostly player CAN incarnate by announcement, which means
> > to flip eir Vitality to Invulnerable, provided
>
> The eliminated player has no obvious use for the granted bang, as it
> will be destroyed before they next become alive. Is this intended to
> give em something to trade with?
>
I believe so too, and I think that it's a good design because it gives
(dead) players something to keep playing the
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 9:08 PM Jaff via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I will point out that there are multiple ways to take actions of an office
> without holding it which this wouldn't cover, such as delegation. I think a
> safer fix would be preventing a player
> On Mar 25, 2024, at 8:53 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> I suggest "un-noted" to prevent all instances of noting 1 infraction
> multiple times.
That doesn’t fix the original issue, as an infraction can be
investigated without being noted. And I don’t really think
> On Mar 25, 2024, at 8:06 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 25/03/2024 19:13, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>> Amend rule 2478 (“Justice”) by replacing: {
>> A player CAN, by announcement, "note" an unforgiven infraction
>> committed by any other
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 3:07 PM Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 25/03/2024 19:13, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> > Amend rule 2478 (“Justice”) by replacing: {
> > A player CAN, by announcement, "note" an unforgiven infraction
On 24/03/2024 12:44, Gaealn Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Mar 24, 2024, at 12:21 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>> hmm... the "Optionally" removes any obligation, but does mean that if
>> there are any documents the Archivist deems worthy of archival (even
>>
> On Mar 24, 2024, at 12:21 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 24/03/2024 09:16, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:> *
> Optionally, any other documents the Archivist deems worthy
>> of archival.
>
> hmm... the "Optionally" removes any obligation,
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 2:10 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 1/28/24 14:04, nix via agora-business wrote:
> > A player CAN flip the Delegate switch of a specified office to
> > emself with Agoran Consent. If the Delegate switch of an office is
>
On 1/5/24 01:42, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 01:40 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> * Inserting the following paragraph after the paragraph:
>>
>> {
>>
>> The basis of a person is the set of all persons that are (recursively)
>> part of em, in addition
On 11/19/23 18:44, Goren Barak via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2023-11-19 16:24, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal:
>>
>> //
>> Title: A simple fix
>> Adoption index: 1.0
>> Author: snail
Which is why you press the button every 144 hours that are reliable to you:
or setup scheduled emails. I feel like also this is similar to apathy but
now you have to track it: anyone can block as long as they press the button
fre. 2. jun. 2023, 12:29 p.m. skrev ais523 via agora-discussion <
On 5/22/23 14:33, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-05-21 01:28]:
>> Changes:
>> - Generally cleaned up wording
>> - Handle rice at Lost and Found
>> - Harvesting a plan now grants rice before revoking (handling the case
>> where a person is in both the up and
ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 21:32 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
This has been the best possible outcome
lør. 20. mai 2023, 11:07 p.m. skrev Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>:
> On 5/21/23 01:59, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I counter by instead submitting the following proposal:
> >
> > {Adoption index = 3
>
On 5/21/23 01:59, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> I counter by instead submitting the following proposal:
>
> {Adoption index = 3
>
> [Stop making small changes to fix things. This security issue happens all
> the time.]
Exactly what non-small change would you want here? Your
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 21:32 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> > saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> > that
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 2:29 PM ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> Or perhaps this is just a case of "the ais523 who has been following
> Agora for over 15 years spots things that the ais523 who had been there
> for only one year didn't".
Lol, I meant to add myself that the rules underlying may
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 14:01 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > That said, I suspect the word in R2029 is currently undefined: I don't
> > think "a definition that was in place at the time the rule was adopted"
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> > saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> > that
On 5/18/23 16:08, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/18/23 15:03, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I
>> violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3
> Sufficient carefulness would be not
On 5/18/23 15:03, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I
violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3
Sufficient carefulness would be not investigating until the CFJ was
resolved, or your timer was
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 8:03 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Having such an unwieldy amount of arcana puts a lot of power in being able
> to give out 'hedonistic' Judgements; ones that are heavily based on "well
> this is best for the game"/"this makes it playable"/etc,
Having such an unwieldy amount of arcana puts a lot of power in being able
to give out 'hedonistic' Judgements; ones that are heavily based on "well
this is best for the game"/"this makes it playable"/etc, especially ones
that have to be that way because of ambiguity. Because we don't know for
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 1:31 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/12/23 01:37, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> > And about "voting strength games", any player could reactivate voting
> > strength on the proposal if they would vote against
On 5/12/23 01:37, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> And about "voting strength games", any player could reactivate voting
> strength on the proposal if they would vote against it. Voting strength
> only matters when there's disagreement anyways, and if there is any, it'll
> get turned
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 12:08 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/12/23 01:02, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> > Each player CAN, with 2 support, flip an ordinary proposal's class
> to
> > expedited, provided it is in the Proposal
On 5/8/23 03:39, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> - It's very easy to find trades that are net beneficial for the traders.
> Most people seem to agree that trading Stamps 1-for-1 is generally
> reasonable and a good trade. Just have the same person do that enough times
> with
On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 13:55 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> my current thoughts are along the lines of "add Radiance for
> participation actions like proposing / officiating / judging / even
> voting
And to clarify: by this I mean voting *at all*, not specifically for
contrary votes
nix wrote:
On 5/1/23 15:05, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
When you do a job manually for a while, you start to use shortcuts, get
faster, streamline, then maybe join a couple of steps using a bit of code…
there’s really no sharp line between “automation” and plain old
“experience” -
On 5/7/23 16:46, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
I agree, it's not surplusage. A finding that "amend" can include changes
other than those explicitly described in Rule 105 would render it surplus.
I guess this is the last time I try to write compromise text, if it's
going to be used to
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:17 AM Aspen via agora-business
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:01 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/2/23 01:01, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:38 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> > >
On 5/2/23 01:01, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:38 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> [Proposal 8639
>> failed to make this change because it used "amend" for a power change.
>
> If everyone involved including you
Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion [2023-05-01 11:46]:
> Maybe making the delegation subject to a public volunteer process - so it’s
> treated differently if more than one person want the job, so the
> hand-picking potential is more limited?
I suggest we treat this the same way as the list of
On 5/1/23 14:46, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> While I was supportive of the delegation idea on discord, I’m coming around
> to Yachay’s position. I’ve “taken breaks” from arbitor regularly - snail
> and Jason both did the job for a bit last year - but when it was
> technically
On 5/1/23 15:05, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> When you do a job manually for a while, you start to use shortcuts, get
> faster, streamline, then maybe join a couple of steps using a bit of code…
> there’s really no sharp line between “automation” and plain old
> “experience” - the two
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 12:37 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/1/23 14:36, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Ideally, I think, everything is doable with automation. In practice tho,
> > I'm not sure what that looks like.
>
> Crucial typo. I think
On 5/1/23 14:49, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> I was actually about to post the same thing about #2 in an election getting
> the bench lol. It seems like the most effort-economic way to do it.
>
> And yeah, I think it could work as per-office.
I'd prefer just trusting the
On 5/1/23 14:18, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> The other part of this is: Janet is Rulekeepor purely because no one has
> bothered to try to take the position properly. The Elections are meant to
> encourage shakeups, but without sufficient platforms for change, then we
> shalln't
Hrm, now that you mention it I think that would be better, yeah.
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 9:38 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/1/23 14:36, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Ideally, I think, everything is doable with automation. In practice tho,
> >
On 5/1/23 14:36, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> Ideally, I think, everything is doable with automation. In practice tho,
> I'm not sure what that looks like.
Crucial typo. I think ideally everything is doable *without* automation.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald
On 5/1/23 14:28, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> Oh, I see now, that's very good.
>
> Hm. I wonder if there was a way to make offices significantly easier so
> that we didn't need to rely on these things or the apparent elitism that
> some offices require.
This will be
Oh, I see now, that's very good.
Hm. I wonder if there was a way to make offices significantly easier so
that we didn't need to rely on these things or the apparent elitism that
some offices require.
But besides resorting to just having everyone play on Google Sheets in
parallel to the regular
On 5/1/23 14:04, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> That seems to alludes that officers prefer to keep their tools to
> themselves or they don't design them to be easily shared in the first
> place, which I don't think is the best practice for Agora overall.
>
> Maybe we can encourage
That seems to alludes that officers prefer to keep their tools to
themselves or they don't design them to be easily shared in the first
place, which I don't think is the best practice for Agora overall.
Maybe we can encourage officers to make/use public tools and tutorials that
anyone can
On 5/1/23 13:49, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> I was actually about to post the same thing about #2 in an election getting
> the bench lol. It seems like the most effort-economic way to do it.
>
> And yeah, I think it could work as per-office.
My main concern is still the time
I was actually about to post the same thing about #2 in an election getting
the bench lol. It seems like the most effort-economic way to do it.
And yeah, I think it could work as per-office.
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:45 PM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On
While I was supportive of the delegation idea on discord, I’m coming around
to Yachay’s position. I’ve “taken breaks” from arbitor regularly - snail
and Jason both did the job for a bit last year - but when it was
technically resigning without the expectation of getting the job back I
think it
On 5/1/23 13:38, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> Perhaps a "bench" system like in team sports, where there is a main
> officer, but if they can't do their roles, or want to take a vacation, the
> person on the bench takes the spot until they come back.
>
> The bench positions are
Perhaps a "bench" system like in team sports, where there is a main
officer, but if they can't do their roles, or want to take a vacation, the
person on the bench takes the spot until they come back.
The bench positions are elected or otherwise offered to everyone equally
somehow.
On Mon, May 1,
Well... I'd like to see Janet take a break and we'll find out how this
process works anyways. It's all part of perfecting these processes
I don't imagine anyone would willingly volunteer to be a delegate,
considering that few even opted to become candidates in the recent
elections.
On Mon,
On 5/1/23 13:32, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> I'm not sure if my main point is coming across that the problem would be
> the "dynasty" thing, where the veteran gets to hand-pick themselves how the
> office continues rather than having a process that is more impartial.
Oh I see.
I'm not sure if my main point is coming across that the problem would be
the "dynasty" thing, where the veteran gets to hand-pick themselves how the
office continues rather than having a process that is more impartial.
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:24 PM nix via agora-discussion <
On 5/1/23 13:20, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/1/23 12:59, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I'm sure that this is well-intended but I feel like this strongly
>> encourages "dynasties" of officers where the veterans are de facto heads of
>> who will get the privilege of
On 5/1/23 12:59, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> I'm sure that this is well-intended but I feel like this strongly
> encourages "dynasties" of officers where the veterans are de facto heads of
> who will get the privilege of choose who get to be the next Delegate or
> not. Having
It's actually the opposite: right now we HAVE dynasties of players who just
have had these roles forever, and they've never taken a break. Encouraging
them to take a break, and specifying a different player, forces more
change-ups than we have currently, because we trust so much currently in
the
On 4/15/23 09:59, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
I think the other forms to gain radiance seem alright, actually. This just
removes the "radiance conditions", of the which I'm not a huge fan of
(gaining radiance from proposals, mostly)
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 6:31 PM Forest
I think the other forms to gain radiance seem alright, actually. This just
removes the "radiance conditions", of the which I'm not a huge fan of
(gaining radiance from proposals, mostly)
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 6:31 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On 4/10/23 14:57, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
(Also, it might be better to include context rather than just "first
instance of 'may'".)
Why?
Eliminates any chance of accidentally changing the wrong thing due to a
concurrent proposal, and is clearer for the reader on what's being
On 4/10/23 15:51, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-04-10 15:41]:
>> On 4/10/23 15:38, juan via agora-business wrote:
>>> I create and submit the following proposal:
>>>
>>> {
>>> Title: Standardizing CANs
>>> Author: juan
>>> A.I.: 3.0
>>>
>>>
On 3/27/23 16:49, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> An Ascetic cannot gain Radiance. Once per week, an Ascetic can Meditate by
>> announcement. Doing so grants them 1 Stamp of their own Type, plus 1 more
>> if the current period they have been an Ascetic for is more than 1 month in
>>
This Proposal wouldn't remove the ability to do so to those who would like
to play that way.
So, you could still do that if you want.
On Monday, March 27, 2023, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> man. 27. mar. 2023 kl. 08:53 skrev Yachay Wayllukuq
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 3:19 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I would not like to be considered a coauthor on this one, as IIRC my only
> contribution was to speak against the cfj changes which you kept, so I
> don’t endorse that. I think having
Janet wrote:
On 1/22/2023 1:55 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
On 1/22/23 12:42, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
Janet wrote:
[Currently, I'm effectively locked out of owning any actually useful
stone without setting a Dream, which isn't really fair. If I attempt to
Is
On 1/22/23 12:42, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet wrote:
>
[Currently, I'm effectively locked out of owning any actually useful
stone without setting a Dream, which isn't really fair. If I attempt to
>>> Is this actually true? I thought that had something to do with
Janet wrote:
[Currently, I'm effectively locked out of owning any actually useful
stone without setting a Dream, which isn't really fair. If I attempt to
Is this actually true? I thought that had something to do with auctions,
which were repealed about a month ago, and any rule or regulation
On 1/15/23 15:47, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Janet wrote:
>
>> [Currently, I'm effectively locked out of owning any actually useful
>> stone without setting a Dream, which isn't really fair. If I attempt to
> Is this actually true? I thought that had something to do with auctions,
> On Aug 20, 2022, at 12:11 AM, Madrid via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> I don't think this helps much because the game is still mostly limited to
> those in the upper half or so of money ranking fmpov because it's still a
> money-fuelled competitive game.
juan had 11 players ahead of em
Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion [2022-08-18 09:23]:
>
> On 8/18/2022 9:07 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Kerim Aydin via agora-business [2022-08-18 07:51]:
> >> I submit the following Proposal:
> >> Title: "Time B Safe"
> >> AI: 4
> >> co-authors: Jason, Murphy.
> >>
On 8/18/2022 9:07 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Kerim Aydin via agora-business [2022-08-18 07:51]:
>> I submit the following Proposal:
>> Title: "Time B Safe"
>> AI: 4
>> co-authors: Jason, Murphy.
>> -
>>
>> Amend Rule 1698 (Agora Is A Nomic) by
On 8/15/22 22:39, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> Nitpicks:
>
>> The Spivak pronouns (e/em/eir) are hereby recognized as the standard
>> third-person singular personal pronouns in Agora. In official contexts,
>> players SHOULD use them when referring to non-specific persons or, in
>>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 2:48 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> ...
> If 90+ is true, the last 90 is also true.
>
oh... my... goodness! -mindblown- how did I not see that
On 6/22/2022 2:46 PM, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 2:41 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> Amend Rule 103 (The Speaker) by replacing "held continuously by the same
>> person for 90+ days" with "held
On 5/8/22 17:44, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
A good start, but has room for improvement. Suggested revision:
4. For filled offices with a weekly report, the number of weeks in
scope, and the number and percent of those weeks during which
the officeholder
we already know that informal auctions are clearly superior to formal ones
so
what about informal win conditions?
this is the next step in agoran evolution
On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 9:19 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 5/8/2022 11:13 AM,
On 5/8/2022 11:13 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-05-08 at 11:06 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> I withdraw my previous proposal, Endgame.
>>
>> I submit the following proposal, Endgame, AI-1, and pay a pendant to pend it:
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Create the
On 5/7/2022 3:50 PM, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/7/22 16:57, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I agree with moving to something like this in principle, but I think that
>> the metric needs work.
>>
>> - you can clear your name by resigning and re-deputizing for the office;
On 5/7/22 16:57, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
I agree with moving to something like this in principle, but I think that
the metric needs work.
- you can clear your name by resigning and re-deputizing for the office;
FWIW if someone did do this they'd then have to do their job
On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 22:43 -0300, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> secretsnail9 via agora-business [2022-05-02 19:03]:
> > I submit the following proposal, and pend it by paying a fee of 1 pendant.
> > {
> > Amend Rule 2621 (VP Wins) by replacing "If a player has at least 20 more
> > Winsomes
Kind of crossposting from Discord but:
Ive played loads of the Sets game (I won once!!) and it was very fun while
I was engaged with it. I didn't mind that the part of gathering 4 for a Set
was "solveable", because the fun of the game wasn't there, it was in what
Ais has pointed out, where you
On 4/8/22 14:58, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Huh? I don't think Cards are solved at all, and that's part of the
>> reason I find them interesting. We've solved the problem of forming
>> sets using cards from players who are active and willing to trade, but
>> there are lots of
On 4/8/2022 12:52 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 19:45 +, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 4/8/22 13:34, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Also, while timing scams are interesting gameplay, I don't think it's a
>>> good idea to change the rules
On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 19:45 +, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 4/8/22 13:34, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Also, while timing scams are interesting gameplay, I don't think it's a
> > good idea to change the rules for the sole purpose of making them easier
> > to perform. In
On 4/8/22 13:34, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> Also, while timing scams are interesting gameplay, I don't think it's a
> good idea to change the rules for the sole purpose of making them easier
> to perform. In this specific situation, the timing element is likely to
> be repealed soon
On 4/8/22 14:05, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 13:54 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit, but do not pend, the following proposal:
>>
>> Title: No finger pointing on behalf
> FWIW, I'd prefer to expand the set of actions-on-behalf rather than
>
Oh, I had in mind to allow people to set up their own bots from their own
email and revel in that anyone now has botting power.
On Friday, April 8, 2022, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/8/22 14:21, Madrid via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Ive been
On 4/8/2022 11:05 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 13:54 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit, but do not pend, the following proposal:
>>
>> Title: No finger pointing on behalf
>
> FWIW, I'd prefer to expand the set of actions-on-behalf rather
On 4/8/22 14:21, Madrid via agora-discussion wrote:
> Ive been looking into mailbots for officerless game tracking.
>
> If Contracts/Acting on Behalf gets repealed I'm up for using the same tech
> for bots that can replace it.
>
> Actually, they could be useful too for secret "contracts",
Ive been looking into mailbots for officerless game tracking.
If Contracts/Acting on Behalf gets repealed I'm up for using the same tech
for bots that can replace it.
Actually, they could be useful too for secret "contracts", currently...
On Friday, April 8, 2022, ais523 via agora-discussion <
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:28 AM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > Create a rule with title "Permits", power 1.0, and the following text:
> > {
> >
> >Beast Permitted is a secured negative boolean person switch,
> >tracked by the Avicultor in
On 3/24/22 12:49, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> This should specify the order of the repeals – repealing two rules
> without specifying the order doesn't work. (This is an important
> mechanic, both for working out the resulting gamestate in cases where
> it matters, and for catching
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 1:29 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > A player CAN swap the locations of two specified spaces by paying a fee
> of
> > 5 Movies.
>
> The grid rule doesn't clearly support this. I think, in general, it
> would be better to
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 6:46 PM Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I knew the meaning from both math and programming, but I still think it
> would look and flow better to express it as "rounded down".
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
>
The ruleset has no
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022, Sarah S. via agora-discussion wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 9:45 PM Aspen via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:41 AM Sarah S. via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 6:47
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 9:45 PM Aspen via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:41 AM Sarah S. via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 6:47 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
> >
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:41 AM Sarah S. via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 6:47 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I submit the below proposal, and then pay a pendant to pend it:
> >
> > Title:
On 2/1/2022 2:48 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/1/22 16:38, Rose Strong via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Unless I am completely misunderstanding the CFJ 3938 ruling a quorum can
>> never be 1.
>>
>
> That's under the current rules, due to the clause that would be changed
>
1 - 100 of 1906 matches
Mail list logo
