On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:21 AM, denstar wrote:
Not. I said the same guy probably listens in with warrants and
without. If you trust him not to blackmail with a warrant then you
should trust him without.
Why? With a warrant you have documentation that X listened to Y.
Only if you want to
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Sam wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:33 AM, denstar wrote:
...
It *looks* like only the data mining got thrown out.
You didn't read it, you guessed.
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/07a0253p-06.pdf
More wishful thinking, than guessing. I saw this
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:33 AM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
If I read it right only the data-mining stuff was dismissed. The rest
stood. Right?
Probably didn't, read it again and let me know.
It *looks* like only the data mining got thrown out.
You didn't read it, you guessed.
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:02 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
Read it. It was overturned.
If I read it right only the data-mining stuff was dismissed. The rest
stood. Right?
Probably didn't, read it again and let me know.
Do you believe in coincidence? Belafonte was just
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Sam wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:02 PM, denstar wrote:
Read it. It was overturned.
If I read it right only the data-mining stuff was dismissed. The rest
stood. Right?
Probably didn't, read it again and let me know.
It *looks* like only the data
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Sam wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:56 PM, denstar
http://epic.org/privacy/terrorism/fisa/acluvnsaop081706.pdf
Let me know what you think.
Read it. It was overturned.
If I read it right only the data-mining stuff was dismissed. The rest
stood. Right?
I
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Powell not resigning and going before the UN and lying his ass off made me
lose all respect for a once honorable soldier. He betrayed his oath.
You think he knew he was lying?
If so, why would the once
for
them.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 7:57 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Shocker: Major corporations may dump health insurance, pay
penalties instead
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Eric Roberts
ow
dump health insurance, pay
penalties instead
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Powell not resigning and going before the UN and lying his ass off made
me
lose all respect for a once honorable soldier. He betrayed his oath.
You think
I think he sold his soul and then later had major regrets and resigned.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:18 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Shocker: Major corporations may dump health insurance, pay
penalties instead
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Shocker: Major corporations may dump health insurance, pay
penalties instead
... because we all know how easy it would be to stand up to the most
powerful man on planet earth.
This is of course assuming he knew he was lying, which I'm not so sure of.
I
think Bush
had major regrets and resigned.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:18 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Shocker: Major corporations may dump health insurance, pay
penalties instead
... because we all know how
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Sam wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:17 AM, denstar wrote:
Then we grow up, become indoctrinated in our politics, and are all
like -- at least politically, mind -- those Palestinian and Israeli
kids, when they grew up.
You do realize you were the
: Shocker: Major corporations may dump health insurance, pay
penalties instead
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Sam wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:17 AM, denstar wrote:
Then we grow up, become indoctrinated in our politics, and are all
like -- at least politically, mind -- those Palestinian
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Eric Roberts wrote:
Powell not resigning and going before the UN and lying his ass off made me
lose all respect for a once honorable soldier. He betrayed his oath.
Reminds me of the Belafonte interview:
http://www.blackcommentator.com/14_belafonte.html
I
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:56 PM, denstar
http://epic.org/privacy/terrorism/fisa/acluvnsaop081706.pdf
Let me know what you think.
Read it. It was overturned.
I think they had a warrant for MLK.
So it was legal, according to your logic. Heck, even without a
warrant. It's the same people
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:17 AM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
Then we grow up, become indoctrinated in our politics, and are all
like -- at least politically, mind -- those Palestinian and Israeli
kids, when they grew up.
You do realize you were the Palestinian kid that was taught
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Sam wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:10 PM, denstar wrote:
At least he's given a lot of lip-service to open government, and
started websites and whatnot.
Did Bush43 do the same thing, and I'm just being biased?
No, Bush was honest about his intentions:)
I see some unhappy reporters.
No doubt. They seem to be an unhappy lot regardless of what is going on.
I wonder if the demand has been the same with this president as with the
last one?
What do you think? Is there a master list of how many interviews each has
done or turned down?
As of
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:37 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think? Is there a master list of how many interviews each
has done or turned down?
Today was his first press conference in 10 months . Is that open?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/world/asia/22detain.html
The cross was stolen, then replaced. The replacement was removed by the DOJ
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
First off...the cross was stolen, not removed by the government.
It was just recently stolen...let me see if I can find the article on that.
I am thinking within the past couple of weeks...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 9:28 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Shocker: Major corporations may dump
http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_D_cross21.dc697f6.html
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
It was just recently stolen...let me see if I can find the article on that.
I am thinking within the past couple of weeks...
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
I see some unhappy reporters.
No doubt. They seem to be an unhappy lot regardless of what is going on.
Some of them, yes. Everybody has an agenda.
This was some great info!
As for this bit:
Regardless of the facts, people want to
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Sam wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:37 PM, denstar wrote:
What do you think? Is there a master list of how many interviews each
has done or turned down?
Today was his first press conference in 10 months . Is that open?
At least he's given a lot of
So this guy's arguing that the media at large is bitching as much about
lack of access as they did during Bush43? It doesn't seem to be on that
scale yet, to me.
Some are. As stated before, reporters seem to be an unhappy lot. Maybe
they label every administration that comes in as the most
To some extent I agree, but then we are on the same slippery slope as
moral relativity.
Although everything is relative, some things are relative-er.
And there *are* differences between the parties.
Like the abortion stuff:
Although both Republicans and Democrats promise the moon and then don't
deliver, they promise different moons.
Amen.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
Although both Republicans and Democrats promise the moon and then don't
deliver, they promise different moons.
Amen.
LOL! Touché.
I love you,
:DeN
--
Here an attempt is made to explain suffering: the outcaste of
traditional Hinduism
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:10 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
At least he's given a lot of lip-service to open government, and
started websites and whatnot.
Did Bush43 do the same thing, and I'm just being biased?
No, Bush was honest about his intentions:)
And besides that,
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Sam wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:03 PM, denstar wrote:
Can't we all agree that more transparency in the government is a good thing?
See Jerry's comment.
I see some unhappy reporters.
I wonder if the demand has been the same with this president as with
The DOJ just removed a WWI memorial cross from the desert because it's
public land. Just imagine what it's going to cost to update all the
tombstones in national cemeteries.
Interesting deal, crosses and the military.
You know about the fight to get a pagan star vs. a cross, right?
First
Correction...Abe was a WWII vet...not a Korean War Vet...
http://www.paganvets.org
-Original Message-
From: Eric Roberts [mailto:ow...@threeravensconsulting.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:42 PM
To: 'cf-community@houseoffusion.com'
Subject: RE: Shocker: Major corporations may dump
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:03 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't we all agree that more transparency in the government is a good thing?
See Jerry's comment.
Where did you get that from? Who's guilty of what?
Come on man, this is the overriding theme we've been on since Bush43
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Sam wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:13 AM, denstar wrote:
Obama seems inclusive, Bush43 seemed exclusive.
Yeah, look at how much he talks to the press :)
It's more important to me that the government itself is open-er than
under Bush. And getting open-er.
Can't we all agree that more transparency in the government is a good
thing?
Damn skippy, we can.
It's more important to me that the government itself is 'open'-er than
under Bush. And getting open-er.
What is your criteria for 'open'-er?
It's obviously not the press, because they are
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Sam wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:57 PM, denstar wrote:
Do you see your bias yet or do we need to keep drilling?
The problem is that the scenarios are not equal. Although *both* do
Bad Things, that doesn't make them the same.
Keep drilling he says.
Just warming up for my new government job: writing history books with
Sam for the big bucks. :)
--
If man makes himself a worm he must not complain when he is trodden on.
Immanuel Kant
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Dana wrote:
nice rant Den
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:13 AM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
Obama seems inclusive, Bush43 seemed exclusive.
Yeah, look at how much he talks to the press :)
Coupled with the push for draconian ideals such as guilty before
innocent, that's a pretty Bad Thing.
Where did you get
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Sam wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:42 PM, denstar wrote:
And now it's worse because of what he started? Which he didn't start.
He just made it evil so now it's progressively more evil because of
him?
It's always been Evil. Bush43 used FUD to push
Sam's Wile'e'er than he looks. No slouch, unless he's being lazy.
My intellectual armament is Vash the Stampede-ish, so it's more than
a bit hit and miss.
:Den
--
Experience without theory is blind, but theory without experience is
mere intellectual play.
Immanuel Kant
On Wed, May 19,
nice rant Den
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:57 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Sam wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:42 PM, denstar wrote:
And now it's worse because of what he started? Which he didn't start.
He just made it evil so now it's
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:57 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you see your bias yet or do we need to keep drilling?
The problem is that the scenarios are not equal. Although *both* do
Bad Things, that doesn't make them the same.
Keep drilling he says.
Look dude, we can
Den,
You're having a battle of intellects with an unarmed person.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:42 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Sam wrote:
--
Larry C. Lyons
web: http://www.lyonsmorris.com/lyons
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/larryclyons
--
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:42 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
And now it's worse because of what he started? Which he didn't start.
He just made it evil so now it's progressively more evil because of
him?
It's always been Evil. Bush43 used FUD to push through, or get away
with, a
Someone's lashing out because she was bitch-slapped by Sarah Palin.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm telling you Denny -- you're bringing logic to a stupid fight.
~|
Order the Adobe
I do find it entertaining. We can have fun dancing around with our
thoughts while the other two act like spoiled idiot children. Can't
really talk logic with them, they won't have it.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:25 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Dana
As if Stupid User *could* finish a sentence let alone rebut one
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone's lashing out because she was bitch-slapped by Sarah Palin.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm telling you Denny --
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah so you think the whole surveillance idea thing is new, started with Bush.
No. What happened under his leadership was especially bad though.
And now it's worse because of what he started? Which he didn't start.
He
delete
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah so you think the whole surveillance idea thing is new, started with
Bush.
No. What happened under his leadership was especially bad though.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Sam wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, denstar wrote:
Ah so you think the whole surveillance idea thing is new, started with
Bush.
No. What happened under his leadership was especially bad though.
And now it's worse because of what he started?
I'm telling you Denny -- you're bringing logic to a stupid fight.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:42 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Sam wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, denstar wrote:
Ah so you think the whole surveillance idea thing is new,
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Dana wrote:
I'm telling you Denny -- you're bringing logic to a stupid fight.
Heh. It's *all* logic.
Relatively.
:)p
I see it sorta like dancing. There is no real goal to speak of.
Well, besides feeling good and having fun.
If Sam feels good and is
it's fascinating to see its programming but... ah, as long as you aree
having fun, I guess
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:25 PM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Dana wrote:
I'm telling you Denny -- you're bringing logic to a stupid fight.
Heh. It's *all*
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Sam wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:56 PM, denstar wrote:
Like, he'd said Bush43 sucked before. Â I remember. Â I think it was the
same list of things, even.
I'm consistent.
Well, there's certainly something to be said for consistency! Bravo!
I'm either
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Sam wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:37 PM, denstar wrote:
It's been out of control for as long as I can remember, really, 'cept
for a time towards the end of Clinton's tenure (guess he robbed
social security to do that tho?).
You pay attention, that's
wrought
--
WHAT HATH GO
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
and that's your basis for using it as an example of domestic investment
Sam.
Snowbirds.
And isn't Phoenix an agricultural center? Orange pickers, hello?
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
You asked for one I gave you many.
Wasn't it the city with the
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
and that's your basis for using it as an example of domestic investment
Yes
Sam.
Snowbirds.
No
And isn't Phoenix an agricultural center? Orange pickers, hello?
Must be a lot of money in picking oranges:
what do you mean no -- no they don't exist? People retire there,
Sam, at least for the winter months.
Snowbirds.
No
Great source -- real estate sales literature. Find me the average
non-retirement income and then let me know.
You're a joke.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
what do you mean no -- no they don't exist? People retire there,
Sam, at least for the winter months.
Snowbirds.
No
Great source -- real estate sales literature. Find me the average
non-retirement
g this from someone who cites sales literature in an discussion of
macroeconomics
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
You're a joke.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
what do you mean no -- no they don't exist? People retire
You asked for one company and I gave you dozens from the top of my
head. You then try to weasel out of conceding by finding a loophole
with one of them. To claim the fastest growing city in America in 2007
had no expanding business except for orange pickers and nursing home
attendants is pretty
I didn't claim that. I said your proof was beyond thin and expressed
incredulity that you posted it in a serious discussion ;P
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
You asked for one company and I gave you dozens from the top of my
head. You then try to weasel out of
many businesses in Phoenix Why Phoenix? Let me see a source for
some of this blather.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Amazon, Ebay, Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, every casino in Vegas, many
businesses in Phoenix. Should I continue?
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:22
You asked for one I gave you many.
Wasn't it the city with the largest growth for the like five years?
Someone must have been hiring.
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
many businesses in Phoenix Why Phoenix? Let me see a source for
some of this blather.
name one
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
A lot.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah? How many businesses did that under Bush?
When the tax rate goes down people invest more. The take more chances
with investments,
Really? That list he just sent was the first I remember seeing. Of
course, I periodically filter his emails to trash, so maybe that's my
fault.
Like, he'd said Bush43 sucked before. I remember. I think it was the
same list of things, even.
It *is* pretty bothersome that he's willing to
no, semicolon is interchangeable with a period
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Medic hofme...@gmail.com wrote:
Ya [read:Yeah], I think you need it more like this:
It *is* pretty bothersome that he's willing to trust the government where
our privacy is concerned; not with medical stuff
link please. I call bullshit
Anyone that understands what just happened with the bill is upset. I
think it was Waxman that subpeanad ATT and others for saying they
would need to write off $ billions for the new law. After a day of
testimony and a review of the documents he conceded they
Kind of.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
no, semicolon is interchangeable with a period
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Medic hofme...@gmail.com wrote:
Ya [read:Yeah], I think you need it more like this:
It *is* pretty bothersome that he's
so but not medical though does not contain a verb -- comma not semicolon
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Medic hofme...@gmail.com wrote:
Kind of.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
no, semicolon is interchangeable with a period
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at
I don't see but not medical though in my sentence.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
so but not medical though does not contain a verb -- comma not semicolon
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Medic hofme...@gmail.com wrote:
Kind of.
On Fri, May 14,
And Haliburton doesn't count.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
name one
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
A lot.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah? How many businesses did that
Sorry, was operating from memory.
But not with medical stuff though still doesn't have a verb in it.
The point remains.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Medic hofme...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see but not medical though in my sentence.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Dana
Do try to remember to stay on target here. Denny was just trying to use a
semi-colon for the fun of it. In an internet meme-y kind of way. I was just
trying to help without basically destroying his original sentence. I should
have maybe changed it to this:
It *is* pretty bothersome that he's
yes, if the object is an English sentence that uses a semicolon
correctly. I however thought he was trying for JavaScript. Could be
me.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Medic hofme...@gmail.com wrote:
Do try to remember to stay on target here. Denny was just trying to use a
semi-colon for the
haha, naw, all these guys just use jQuery now. No one knows how to write JS
anymore but me.
/runs
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, if the object is an English sentence that uses a semicolon
correctly. I however thought he was trying for JavaScript.
Amazon, Ebay, Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, every casino in Vegas, many
businesses in Phoenix. Should I continue?
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
name one
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
A lot.
By bad, it was cancelled before they testified.
http://congress.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/04/14/canceled-hearing-that-would-have-grilled-ceos-on-health-care/
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
link please. I call bullshit
Anyone that understands what just
Didn't they get one of the largest no-bid contracts evah just last weekend?
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
And Haliburton doesn't count.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology
Interestingly enough it looks like Haliburton is up to its old tricks.
They were responsible for putting cement down the drill hole at the
Transocean's Deepwater Horizon drill site. It been suggested that the
procedure was so poorly done it may have caused the explosion.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at
I wouldn't know. I don't watch Faux News. I prefer real news to fictional stuff.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Didn't they get one of the largest no-bid contracts evah just last weekend?
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com
That's Cheney's fault right?
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
Interestingly enough it looks like Haliburton is up to its old tricks.
They were responsible for putting cement down the drill hole at the
Transocean's Deepwater Horizon drill site. It
I only watch Bret Beir but what the hell.
Pick an news channel you watch and we'll compare for accuracy.
I'm guessing you're into Obie, Mathews and Maddox.
It's is odd for eight years you're real news channel rags about
Haliburton and all the sudden a no-bid contract isn't even news. Makes
you
this is true. I'm not sure what the chances are that it will work, probably
under 50%. For $20 it's probably worth a try. It is a lot more portable than
a cpap :)
On May 12, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Dana wrote:
I have heard that this works for some people. Much depends, I am told,
on the
I would think the difference would be obvious.
My point exactly.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
I believe that the contrary has in fact been demonstrated. They listen
to many many calls with no al Qaeda connection.
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Haha.
I meant you don't need worry unless you're calling a known al Qaeda operative.
On Wed, May 12, 2010
They were legal. We discussed this endlessly here. The government
doesn't need a warrant to tap al Qaeda and if you call al Qaeda expect
them to listen in. It's worse now under Obama and it's still not an
issue. Who's complaining about it?
I'm still complaining and you are still telling me
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
And why weren't there Tea Parties when the *cough*illegal*cough*
wiretapping and crap was going down? That's when we should have been in the
streets with torches.
There were people protesting. The media gave them a lot of attention,
Obama's open government initiative failing in a big way ...
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/obamas-open-government-initiative-failing-in-a-big-ways-90364464.html
I must be, because it *still* /feels/ like a more open government to me.
I don't know if
If it works for you, good! I asked about them and was told this was
not an option. Ditto losing weight -- well, it's an option, and
desirable for other reasons, but it won't do anything about the sleep
apnea, they tell me. It is enough in some cases though apparently.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at
Don't they have like 20 seconds to listen for key words? Not sure how
it works but if you think they're listening to you they probably are
:)
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that the contrary has in fact been demonstrated. They listen
to many many
You're complaining about something Obama is doing?
I don't believe you. Use his name in the same sentence as a complaint.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
They were legal. We discussed this endlessly here. The government
doesn't need a warrant to tap al
The Bush admin met with Enron and denied all their request unlike the
Clinton admin that bent over backwards for them. Nice curve ball but
lets get real, open government is a farce.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
Obama's open government initiative failing
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Sam wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:24 PM, denstar wrote:
Tea parties are against excessive taxes and spending. That's a new
phenomenon.
Sure, if your lifespan is measured in thousands of years. :)
Did you notice it's not constant?
Which, death or
I think you totally miss my point.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't they have like 20 seconds to listen for key words? Not sure how
it works but if you think they're listening to you they probably are
:)
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Dana
Obama should not continue warrantless wiretaps and is wrong to do so.
Obama has put too much faith in the emissaries of Goldman Sachs.
now let me see you do the same for Bush or even Cheney.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
You're complaining about something
Really? How do you know? They fought the Sierra Club and Judicial
Watch for years to avoid saying that.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
The Bush admin met with Enron and denied all their request unlike the
Clinton admin that bent over backwards for them. Nice
well... to avoid say they met with them. I don't believe for a minute
that they denied Kenny Boy's requests.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
Really? How do you know? They fought the Sierra Club and Judicial
Watch for years to avoid saying that.
On Thu, May
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
