Hi jon,
Thanks for reply. I can show this link to my boss.
Thanks & Warms Regards,
Milind Tare
--- Jonathan V Hays wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like the IOS has given you the answer:
> "Command rejected: One
> or more ports is already configured as a trunk
> port."
>
> And the documentation
Hi,
It looks like the IOS has given you the answer: "Command rejected: One
or more ports is already configured as a trunk port."
And the documentation confirms that you cannot configure multi-VLAN and
trunk ports on the same 2900XL/3500XL switch. See:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/prod
Hi,
Yes. I registered with Prometric and, as usual, I wrote my Cisco ID was on
the registration form.
Thanks.
Mwalie
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71325&t=71316
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
when you registered for the exam did you give them your cisco id number?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71323&t=71316
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report mi
Okay, I'm responding to my own post. I found a very similar bug that occurs
on 1700 series routers running 12.0(7). Would that happen to be what you're
running?
John
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: Ethernet Interface C
Carroll Kong wrote:
>
>
> Even NRF has mentioned diversity is the key,
"Even" me, eh? Ouch.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71321&t=71143
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.c
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
>
> That is anecdotal nonsense. Any major corporation in need of
> real techs and
> that has a Cisco infrastructure will certainly consider CCIEs
> very
> seriously, yes even above so-called "CS" degree holders without
> much
> experience, for technical lead positions. I c
douglas mizell wrote:
> not. I honestly cannot comment on the job market at home except
> to say it
> sounds dismal, if there really are CCIE's out there fighting
> over $35K jobs
> than to hell with this whole idea, open a taco stand.
>
Which is why a growing number of them are leaving the indus
This reminds me that recently we had a similar problem with output errors on
a FastEthernet interface and the problem was IOS-related. Different
situation, though. That was on a 3660 and it was an autonegotiation bug.
Still, that's something to check into, as well.
What IOS image is on that rout
Hi All,
Please, I have a small issue to ask.
My Cisco ID is CSCO10463864.
Recently, I received beta results for a test I had done, but on the report,
everything is the okay (my names, testing center, etc, etc) but the Cisco ID
is different: CSCO10606645.
Now, I can not see this test in my datab
Used CSS11152's in datacenter with SSL. Worked good.
""Herlocker, Tim"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if anybody has worked with the CSS 11000 switches at all.
We
> are looking at purchasing one or two but would like to make sure SSL
sticky
> works on them firs
Rooban, have you found the free sample CCIE written exam questions? If so, I
am interested in that too. Thanks!
Also, if you go to http://www.boson.com/products/66717.htm?ID=1084 the #3 is
said to be a good sample exam. I haven't tried it yet but you can download a
couple of questions for free.
E
Hi,
Does anyone know the procedure of how to recover a corrupted software of a
Content Engine CE-505?
Any help or link is very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Xy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71313&t=71313
-
The situation I worked with was a service provider (Latin America or East
Asia; I worked both and I don't remember which). They had 5 cities, with FR
connections between them, but not a full mesh. What they wanted (and I did
not fully understand their rationale, but that wasn't a requirement) was f
I like this one--
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3514.txt
--note the date, and author.
Annlee
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rbx10 Defcom wrote:
> >
> > Anyone has a list of the major RFCs..
> > I'm just trying to make sure I covered them
> > thanks
>
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message ...
> I'm glad you asked that. :-) I did in fact recently compile a list of
> "must-read" RFCs. It is here:
I keep a private-list like this as well. I like to group them by functional
importance to my line of work... e.g. NOC/Contact-related, IP/ASN-rel
ok great referrences, thanks everybody, keep the forum live!!!
:-)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71312&t=71084
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscond
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> I'm concerned about the output errors. Collisions are not
> considered output
> errors; they're to be expected with half duplex ethernet. So,
> you do really
> have a problem of some variety that needs to be investigated.
Thanks for that info, John. I wasn't sure if ou
rbx10 Defcom wrote:
>
> Anyone has a list of the major RFCs..
> I'm just trying to make sure I covered them
> thanks
> -rbx10
I'm glad you asked that. :-) I did in fact recently compile a list of
"must-read" RFCs. It is here:
http://www.troubleshootingnetworks.com/rfcs.html
Priscilla
Messag
At 10:21 PM 6/24/2003 +, MADMAN wrote:
>The spokes only connect via the hub if you don't have a PVC between
>the spokes. It doesn't matter if your uni or bi,
You can actually buy unidirectional PVC service? What do people do with that?
Curious,
Zsombor
> you have 2 DLCI's per
>PVC, one on
Dear All, I am in the process of selecting a PIX model and would like to
know how many TCP sessions on average, and on peak that the router
receive ? Can this be accomplished using NetFlow ? If not, what other
options are available. Best Regards,Yasser
-
The spokes only connect via the hub if you don't have a PVC between
the spokes. It doesn't matter if your uni or bi, you have 2 DLCI's per
PVC, one on each end. In our frame network we using local addressing of
DLCI's, DLCI 16 could be on both ends of a PVC. Some carries use what
is called g
See feedback inline.
Eric
- Original Message -
From: "The Long and Winding Road"
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:09 AM
Subject: OSPF Tricks of the Trade [7:66308]
> After wrestling with Solie this afternoon, it suddenly occurred to me that
> there is a typical instruction in the
At 07:56 PM 6/24/2003 +, annlee wrote:
>Even if it is "switched from spoke-to-spoke", at Layer 1 the spokes connect
>via the hub. And to do anything with the traffic, Layer 2 must be
>consulted -- which gives us Priscilla's DLCI switching table. And, unless
>the traffic is unidirectional, you w
Erik Mintz wrote:
>
> The short answer is no.
>
> Server1 requests a file from Server2.
> At router Chicago, a frame is created with a remote
> destination DLCI 100.
> Encapsulated in that frame is the packet with a destination of
> Server 1.FR
> is a layer two protocol. It only has info to forw
I haven't seen any feedback from others on your thoughts. See my comments
below.
Eric
- Original Message -
From: "The Long and Winding Road"
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 8:13 AM
Subject: OSPF Topology Question - Parkhurst's Book [7:65532]
> Ran into something in Parkhurst's OSPF b
I worked with some WAN implementations (not Cisco equipment) where the
traffic was unidirectional, probably for QoS and/or billing purposes.
""Zsombor Papp"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 07:56 PM 6/24/2003 +, annlee wrote:
> >Even if it is "switched from spoke-to-spoke", at La
Herlocker, Tim 6/24/03 3:03:10 PM >>>
>Hi,
>
>Just wondering if anybody has worked with the CSS 11000 switches at all.
We
>are looking at purchasing one or two but would like to make sure SSL
sticky
>works on them first
>Thanks in advance!
>
>- Tim
We've been using them for a few years an
Erik Mintz wrote:
>
> The short answer is no.
>
> Server1 requests a file from Server2.
> At router Chicago, a frame is created with a remote
> destination DLCI 100.
> Encapsulated in that frame is the packet with a destination of
> Server 1.FR
> is a layer two protocol. It only has info to forw
Hi Tim,
We use CSS's in the content server area in the data centers here..
We used the 1150x primarily and sticky seems to work as expected..let
Me know if you have specifics and I'll try and help...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM
Don't know what major is to you but here you will find them:
http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/cs/Services/rfc/index.html
Dave
rbx10 Defcom wrote:
> Anyone has a list of the major RFCs..
> I'm just trying to make sure I covered them
> thanks
> -rbx10
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engin
I'm concerned about the output errors. Collisions are not considered output
errors; they're to be expected with half duplex ethernet. So, you do really
have a problem of some variety that needs to be investigated.
I'm not familiar with the bridge you're referring to. Are you positive that
it is
The short answer is no.
Server1 requests a file from Server2.
At router Chicago, a frame is created with a remote destination DLCI 100.
Encapsulated in that frame is the packet with a destination of Server 1.FR
is a layer two protocol. It only has info to forward the packet to the
remote switch w
Even if it is "switched from spoke-to-spoke", at Layer 1 the spokes connect
via the hub. And to do anything with the traffic, Layer 2 must be
consulted -- which gives us Priscilla's DLCI switching table. And, unless
the traffic is unidirectional, you will need DLCIs for the opposite
direction, as w
"Major" in what sense? A great deal depends on the topic at hand. IP vs
TCP/UDP, vs MPLS, vs addressing, etc.
I personally use the RFC Editor pages' search function and get creative with
keywords:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html
Annlee
""rbx10 Defcom"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PRO
Hi,
Just wondering if anybody has worked with the CSS 11000 switches at all. We
are looking at purchasing one or two but would like to make sure SSL sticky
works on them first
Thanks in advance!
- Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71292&t=71292
-
At 06:33 PM 6/24/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Aaron Ajello wrote:
> >
> > This is probably a very simple concept question, but I've asked
> > a couple people and haven't gotten a solid answer.
> >
> > If I've got two frame relay spoke sites connected point to
> > point with a hub site
The problem is that we are doing VoIP over the link using Cisco FXO and FXS
ports and People are complaining about Voice breaking up, like a bad cell
phone call. I heard it myself, it sounds good but sometimes breaks up.The
routers are running g.729 and use the Wireless link. I have looked into the
man, those are some complete, detailed answers.
thanks a lot.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71283&t=71263
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct a
it goes thru the hub site. The frame network would act like a LAN in
that respect provided you are fully meshed.
No free PVCs!!
Dave
Aaron Ajello wrote:
> This is probably a very simple concept question, but I've asked a couple
> people and haven't gotten a solid answer.
>
> If I've got
Looking at Doyle "Routing TCP/IP Vol I" page 808
"set metric" looks like you could plug in the EIGRP metrics. Maybe add a
little delay for that route.
> -Original Message-
> From: Salvatore De Luca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Go, Cisco, milk that cash cow! Hope it doesn't kick you in theoh, look
a bird!
""annlee"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Here's the actual announcement:
>
>
>
> CISCO INTRODUCES CCNA PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS
> CCNA Offers New Exams for Those Entering Networking Field
>
>
My opinion is that it will go to the hub site since it's a point to
point network..
If the hub were to be a multi-point connection to the spokes, which
would be one network,
Then the traffic could be switched from spoke to spoke...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-Original Message-
From
""n rf"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mark E. Hayes wrote:
> >
> > The way I see it, which judging by the responses is wrong, you
> > start a
> > business by doing what you know how to do. I can't start a
> > business
> > making paper because I have no clue how to do that. A big
> >
Aaron Ajello 6/24/03 11:41:41 AM >>>
>This is probably a very simple concept question, but I've asked a couple
>people and haven't gotten a solid answer.
>
>If I've got two frame relay spoke sites connected point to point with a
hub
>site and a server in one spoke site copies a file to a serve
Don't you divide the number of collisions by the number of output packets to
get the rate? If so, 86548/6314935=0.013, which is pretty close to .1 in my
book.
Mark
> The Cisco bridge operates in Half-duplex and that is why half-duplex. The
> Router is a Cisco 1751 with WIC-1ENET, which is conn
Thanks Daniel.. I will play with it..
-Sal
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71285&t=71220
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure vi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Don't you divide the number of collisions by the number of
> output packets to
> get the rate?
Yes and then multiply by 100 to get a percent. Cisco's threshold is a
percent.
But I agree with the gist of your message. It's not a big deal if the result
is 1.3%, even th
annlee wrote:
>
> Since the original question related to virus and certain ports,
> etc., here's
> a good reference to keep an eye on:
>
> http://isc.incidents.org/
Great! There you have it. NetBIOS port 137 at the top of the list. Since
broadcasts aren't carried across a router, the attackers d
Here's the actual announcement:
CISCO INTRODUCES CCNA PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS
CCNA Offers New Exams for Those Entering Networking Field
Today, Cisco Systems, Inc. . announces three enhancements to the
CCNA. (Cisco Certified Network Associate) Program which are based on
custo
Sticking a router in a port fast port is probably okay, since there
should be no
Bpdu's generated by the router. Most Cisco switches don't allow the
trunk function
And the stp-portfast function on at the same time...you do not want the
portfast
Function enabled on trunks...
Larry Letterman
Cis
This link may serve you better:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/prod_visio_icon_list.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>For visio:
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/503/icons1.zip
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/503/icons2.zip
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/503/icons3.zip
>http://www.
Anyone has a list of the major RFCs..
I'm just trying to make sure I covered them
thanks
-rbx10
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71276&t=71276
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/li
j k wrote:
>
> hi pple, well the reason why i ask this is because, recently i
> was told by my network manager that there is a virus which uses
> netbios (udp 137, tcp 138 and tcp 139) as a transport and had
> acrosses the WAN from a spoke site to a hub site.
The NetBIOS ports are infamous target
CiscoNewbie wrote:
>
> Great write up. Thanks.
>
> So what is the current exam number?
640-861 DESGN
>
> Is it just one exam that I have to take?
Yes, It's just one exam to get CCDA. Lots of exams to get CCDP.
>
> Do you know what the new exam number will be or is?
I think it's the same
CISCO INTRODUCES CCNA PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS
CCNA Offers New Exams for Those Entering Networking Field
Today, Cisco Systems, Inc. . announces three enhancements to the CCNA.
(Cisco Certified Network Associate) Program which are based on customer
feedback, the need for an accessible entry path i
Here's the Cisco announcement:
CISCO INTRODUCES CCNA PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS
CCNA Offers New Exams for Those Entering Networking Field
Today, Cisco Systems, Inc. . announces three enhancements to the CCNA.
(Cisco Certified Network Associate) Program which are based on customer
feedback, the ne
Frame-Relay is a L2 protocol. Assuming with your HUB acting as the
multipoint connection and appropriate map statments exist on the spoke's,
and your routing protocol is configured to compliment all three sites, it
will a spoke will traverse the HUB to reach the other spoke.
Message Posted at:
ht
Aaron Ajello wrote:
>
> This is probably a very simple concept question, but I've asked
> a couple people and haven't gotten a solid answer.
>
> If I've got two frame relay spoke sites connected point to
> point with a hub site and a server in one spoke site copies a
> file to a server in the oth
Can someone recommend a good stable code for an AS5800. Thanks.
Thanks,
Mario Puras
SoluNet Technical Support
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71264&t=71264
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What about layer 3 segmentation? You do not want to shoot broadcasts trough
all your repaters.
The problem is, using repeaters wil give you a hub-like environment. When
using bridges full frames are sto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What about layer 3 segmentation? You do not want to shoot broadcasts trough
all your repaters.
The problem is, using repeaters wil give you a hub-like environment. When
using bridges full frames are stored and forwarded.
Martijn
- -Oorspronkeli
As long as playing with EIGRP is not an absolute requirement, how about a
regular old route-map?
> -Original Message-
> From: Salvatore De Luca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: EIGRP & Distance command [7:71220]
>
>
Curious 6/24/03 10:25:25 AM >>>
>Hello,
>
>I know that is a bad idea to configure a port with "portfast" when this
port
>connect with other switch (loops can be created), but the question is:
could
>I put a port connected to a router in portfast mode? A router is a layer 3
>device not a layer
This is probably a very simple concept question, but I've asked a couple
people and haven't gotten a solid answer.
If I've got two frame relay spoke sites connected point to point with a hub
site and a server in one spoke site copies a file to a server in the other
spoke site, does all the traffic
Just out of curiosity, how would you create a route-map to modify EXTERNAL
EIGRP specific-routes... since that was the requirement.. Now
that I think about it.. I wonder if something like this would work if I
included it in the prior config?
route-map EIGRP permit 10
set metric +/- (EIGRP Metri
neil K wrote:
>
> The Cisco bridge operates in Half-duplex and that is why
> half-duplex. The
> Router is a Cisco 1751 with WIC-1ENET, which is connected to
> the Wireless
> Bridge.
> I checked with the "output Interpreter" on CCO and it said the
> collisions
> are more than 0.53 much higher than
milind tare wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
> I have 3500 series switches in my network. i want
> to configure multiple vlan for some ports. right now i
> am using following IOS
>
> IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M), Version
> 12.0(5)WC3b, RELEASE SOFTWA
> RE (fc1)
The native Vlan on the 5500 is Vlan 13.
Hemingway:
The config I posted was from a 4500M router with a NP-6e module installed.
Like I said before I have don't have a problem with 2 of the 3 vlans on the
trunk link, but it's Vlan 13 that's the problem. I'm not able to ping from
and to anywhere on
The Cisco bridge operates in Half-duplex and that is why half-duplex. The
Router is a Cisco 1751 with WIC-1ENET, which is connected to the Wireless
Bridge.
I checked with the "output Interpreter" on CCO and it said the collisions
are more than 0.53 much higher than 0.1 normal rate.
Here's the outpu
Hello,
I know that is a bad idea to configure a port with "portfast" when this port
connect with other switch (loops can be created), but the question is: could
I put a port connected to a router in portfast mode? A router is a layer 3
device not a layer 2, so I think this is not a risk, am I righ
I haven't seen anything about this before, so I thought I'd share an article
from CertMag
Cisco_PolishesCisco Polishes CCNA Certification
Cisco Systems will announce several enhancements to the Cisco Certified
Network Associate (CCNA) program tomorrow, June 24th. CCNA, Cisco's most
popular
Hi,
I don't normally participate in threads like this but I could not
resist. Everything posted so far is probably correct and necessary and would
apply generically to any job hunt. I have my lab scheduled for October
(first attempt). I started this odyssey a couple of years ago and
At 01:51 PM 6/24/2003 +, p b wrote:
>Someone sent me a pointer off list (thanks Rob) that pointed
>me to the "bgp inject-map" command.
Yes, that's probably a much better suggestion. Wonder why off list..?
Thanks,
Zsombor
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71
Thank you Daniel for the information.. I wonder if anybody was ever able to
manipulate EIGRP metrics to perform such a task.. I doubt it..
-Sal
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71252&t=71220
--
FAQ, list archives, an
obviously I should clearly have a better comprehension of the questions
before I post, sorry
you may want to clear eigrp tables and neighbors after you change
administrative "distance"
KC-R10-01#clear ip eigrp ?
Autonomous System
neighbors Clear IP-EIGRP neighbors
vrfSelect a VP
"Any ideas to what is causing this?"
Johan
wrong flash image- You need the correct image that supports the hardware
we use 1721's with WIC-2T cards in them.
""Johan Bornman"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have installed a wic2t on a 1720 router. The s0 interface on the wic2t
> works
That is true, but to be legal Jamie must also purchase the Enterprise
feature set for both routers. And, just so you all know, I know for a fact
that Cisco is monitoring CCO downloads and making sure you actually have
service contracts and licenses for the software you're downloading. Don't
think
Thanks. Yea, this is a real design.
Can't do the /25 statics to the entity that IGP advertises the
/24 as there are dual links and multiple hops and certain failure
scenarios will cause traffic to get blackholed.
Someone sent me a pointer off list (thanks Rob) that pointed
me to the "bgp i
I'm not sure but I think Srivathsan ment to say "clear ip route * " (the
asterisk or a network is required)
"clear ip bgp * " would clear all peers and BGP connections also
""Srivathsan Ananthachari"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Not sure though , but a "clear ip route" after changin
Great write up. Thanks.
So what is the current exam number?
Is it just one exam that I have to take?
Do you know what the new exam number will be or is?
I was looking at taking the following course, what do
you think:
http://www.knowledgenet.com/courselibrary/cisco/courses/desgn_pf.jsp
Tha
boson.com, if your looking for warez, well then that's another story.
- Original Message -
From: "Monahan Derrick"
To:
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:48 PM
Subject: Boson Test 5.03 [7:71202]
> Can anyone point me to the direction of downloading the Boson Cisco exam
set
> ver 5.03 ? A fri
Purchase a smartnet contract for a 1600 series router. It will cost you
less than $200 and you'll have download access.
thanks,
-Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
Network Learning Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware)
""Jamie Johnson"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> yasmin ashraf 6/24/03 6:00:35 AM> >>>
>Dear Sir,
>
>I need some help. Actually I am trying to configure
>BRI. When I type command "Sh ISDN status" then it
>shows BRI Layer 1 is deactivated. But whereas NTBA box
>shows both lights (Line, Voltage) as Ok. Following is
>my cable configuration from
hi macro,
Thanks for ur reply, i tried that options also
but it is not working error mesg is coming " command
is Rejected".
Thanks & regards,
milind Tare
--- "M.C. van den Bovenkamp"
wrote:
> milind tare wrote:
>
> > IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M),
> Version
> > 12.0(5)WC3b,
Does anyone know if the supIV is going to support IPX ACL's anytime
in the near future???
Thanks
Dave
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
"Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it
can do something to the people." -
My bad--the hyperlinks work, but are not visible until you poise the mouse.
I probably need less coffee to get a good poise...;-)
Annlee
""Andy Barkl"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Priscilla has hit the nail on the head as usual!
> If you don't have the experience with Cisco's AVVID
Very nice article, Andy. Unfortunately, the hyperlinks didn't post with the
article (things like "you can see the xxx here" has no link). Most links I
can chase down, but there are a few I can't discern. Do you have a copy of
the aricle with links that you are allowed to send? If so, I'd appreciate
>From my /etc/services...
netbios-ns 137/tcp#NETBIOS Name Service
netbios-ns 137/udp#NETBIOS Name Service
netbios-dgm 138/tcp#NETBIOS Datagram Service
netbios-dgm 138/udp#NETBIOS Datagram Service
netbios-ssn 139/tcp#NETBIOS Session Service
netbios-ssn
I've been playing around with MRTG - Multi Router Traffic Grapher. And I
highly recommend it if you'd like a way to monitor traffic load on router
interfaces. Very easy to set up and get going. It's open source and
versions for unix and windows are available.
You can check it out here - www.mrtg
At 11:26 AM + 6/24/03, ericbrouwers wrote:
>Is NetBIOS a protocol in the sense of ISO's OSI definition??
Not necessarily for ISO, but see RFC 1001 and 1002 for the IETF definition.
> I never really
>checked it. Originally it was a programming interface on IBM PCs. I did some
>network progra
Since the original question related to virus and certain ports, etc., here's
a good reference to keep an eye on:
http://isc.incidents.org/
You'll notice which ports have the most activity by geographical region
(there are marked differences). You can also look at the hyperlinks
associated with ea
A lot of us have mentioned that it is not usually just the raw
certification that gets the job, and in some cases, not even both
experience and the certification.
Even NRF has mentioned diversity is the key, but on top of that
people skills. Lack people skills, you will find yourself not makin
Mike Mandulak wrote:
> .. and Openview and Sniffers and SNA and MVS and Unix and clusters and VAX
> and Concord and etc...
>
> Your probably right about the downsizing, if that's the case I pity the
poor
> soul who takes the 4 jobs. BTDT, they gave me the tee-shirt.
I burned mine, and I ain't go
If is for study, send me mail
If not, if is for enterprise, sorry, I can't help you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71230&t=71204
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.h
sorry i asked wrong quastion, what is advantages of tunnel than
virtual-links in ospf.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71229&t=71119
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
Is NetBIOS a protocol in the sense of ISO's OSI definition?? I never really
checked it. Originally it was a programming interface on IBM PCs. I did some
network programming with NetBIOS back in 1989... yes, old man...
When I started reading commercial Cisco certification books, the authors
sometim
milind tare wrote:
> IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M), Version
> 12.0(5)WC3b, RELEASE SOFTWA
> RE (fc1)
>
> i tried the command switchport multi vl but it is
> not working in that.
No? It ought to.
You started with 'switch
Dear All,
I have 3500 series switches in my network. i want
to configure multiple vlan for some ports. right now i
am using following IOS
IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M), Version
12.0(5)WC3b, RELEASE SOFTWA
RE (fc1)
i
Hunt
The 4500 uses a boot helper image when it starts up. The boot helper is a
cut down IOS that (hopefully) recognises most of your devices (useful if
you need to use tftp) and then tries to load the main IOS.
You shouldnt need to upgrade the bootflash, although I would make sure you
have a
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
