Have I got a good one!
Just got through reading an RFP for a large organization. Over 30 sites,
12,000 ports, and 2000 phones. Complete rebuild of the network LAN and WAN
infrastructure. Add to that throwing out all their old PBX and key systems
and building for VoIP and video, in addition to curr
""Cisco Newbie"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone recommend a good Cisco switching book that is not to basic and
> explains vlans in good detail with some advance examples. Thanks.
>
>
Kennedy Clark's book Cisco LAN Switching ( Cisco Press ) is a good pl
based on a recent thread regarding the 0.0.0.0 network
since about 12.0 or so, when placing networks into EIGRP, one can use a
wildcard mask.
example:
router eigrp 100
network 1.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
which places 1.1.0.0/16 into the eigrp process.
I did a bit of digging around both the Doc CD and
new ACLs on the Router BEFORE you doing anything else.
> This way, you can change the command that implements the new ACL last,
> and you should be able to re-connect shortly afterwards. I've had fun
> with this while working on a IOS VPN solution- it was a rude awakening,
> an
even with 16/16 once in a while something strange
happens, something that a simple reload cures. I suspect that when the
images start creeping into the 16 meg range, that the router runs out of
places to put things.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "The Long and Winding Road"
&g
It's getting to where I actually wish troubleshooting would come back to the
lab ;->
had two routers go into endless reload tonight when I turned a few on to get
some more practice.
after going through the password recovery procedure for both, it appears
that the two routers in question did not l
ork
> 192.168.1.0" won't put S1 into eigrp, thus won't distribute the 172.22.0.0
> network info into S0 side.
yep.
>
> I am using IOS12.1.5(10T).
>
> Regards
> Wei
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "The Long and Winding Road"
> To:
> S
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> well, now that I've set it up, looked at it, and given it some thought,
the
> answer is really quite simple.
> being a simple person myself, I like it when answe
well, now that I've set it up, looked at it, and given it some thought, the
answer is really quite simple.
being a simple person myself, I like it when answers are simple. think
"classful nature of eigrp"
see below
""Wei Zhu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ---E
it's happened twice now, and the policy routing was removed from the
interface, so I'm thinking the problem has to be the NAT configuration
The problem: remote configuration of a router.
Circumstances: remove poorly constructed access-lists. replace them with
better constructed access-lists that
""Matthew Webster"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> just a minor (I think) question. In the OSPF LSR message, why does the LS
> type have 4 bytes to describe it, when there are only 5 different values?
Am
> I missing something?
a) room for growth
b) w
""Angel Leiva"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> All,
>
>
>
> Somehow my e-mail posting this morning got chopped off along its way. Here
> it is again:
>
>
you might want to try again. if your text contains a left pointing bracket,
the news servers seems to chop ou
""Symon Thurlow"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I think MCSE/CCNP will open more doors, although you will probably find
> that in most of the jobs, you will be used 90% for MCSE type stuff, and
> 10% for CCNP type stuff (generalising here I know, but based on my
>
pvc x/y "should" work, which leads me to wonder about your IOS version. What
are you running? what is the image name?
I do not see an "atm pvc" command in the 12.1 command reference.
also you mention something about connecting two 3640's back to back via an
OC3 card? I'm not sure you can do that.
yes it is a CDP ver 2 bug.
I posted a similar report, including configs and outputs a week or two back,
and someone was kind enough to let me know about his experiences in this
matter.
check back a couple of weeks in the archives.
HTH
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
follow-up based on an offline conversation I've been having with someone.
parts edited because I don't know if the sender would want his name
associated with my ignorance.
-
well, you know, you're probably right. the receiving end would be the only
place
""Amar"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> to eliminate the contreversy
> subinterfaces are only supported on fastethernet.
are you sure about that? on a 2513 router:
Ethernet0 149.22.1.7 YES NVRAM up
up
Ethernet0.1unassigned
""bergenpeak"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is it possible, using RIPv1, to send advertisements which will
> be interpreted as /32s? I would think this is not possible
> as the route would be either advertised as a classful route
> (when crossing classful boundaries) or would be i
""bergenpeak"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is it possible, using RIPv1, to send advertisements which will
> be interpreted as /32s? I would think this is not possible
> as the route would be either advertised as a classful route
> (when crossing classful boundaries) or would be i
""Peter Walker"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This does NOT match my previous experience. My experience has been that
> IOS seems to use NAT (not overloaded) until all pool addresses are used
> then start overloading the last one. I dont know what happens once
""Doug S"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The way PAT works when overloading multiple addresses is to overload the
> first address in the pool until ALL port numbers are used up. I can't
point
> you to any publicly available documentation on this, but cut and past
""Francisco Sedano/Inf-Pronet"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello!
>
> And there are some issues with several protocols, as Marc points out. In
> FTP, for example, possibly the new packet will be larger than original
one.
> (IP Addresses are codified in the data
""Brian"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> These have the usual 1500-2500 dollar cost?? I'd like to find a modestly
> priced training solution.
Brian, are you a Cisco customer, or work for one? Are you able to get to the
Cisco training offerings at
http://www.cis
This link was posted the other day.
Check out:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/browse/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:NA
T
watch the wrap
this is a jump page, with links to a number of resources, including RFC
1631.
The process is quite simple. For normal NAT, the NAT engine replaces the
so
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> once again, the public teaser issue of the Cook Report can be found here:
>
> http://cookreport.com/11.11.shtml
>
> for those considering the value of their
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I dont believe so either, since they only support a 10BT
> > ethernet connection...
>
> It is correct that the 2500 does not support trun
ront
yard, all the broken beer bottles smashed all over the sidewalk, and the
fact that no one in my family has shaved or bathed in a couple of months?
;->
>
>
>
>
>
> > >
> > > Pete
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > >
ster with Cisco link below, will they
automatically
> submit it to certain government organization? Thanks much!
can't help you there. I've never done any 3des internationally. just
domestic.
>
> Thomas
>
>
> ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
""reddyred"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Has anyone found any cheap, USEFUL virtual labs for the CCNP track. I'm
> currently an unemployed CCNA and don't have $1,000 bucks for online labs
nor
> equipment
>
If you are a Cisco customer,you can contact your Cisco
""Thomas Muller"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to configure dot1q on the LAN interface on my Cisco 2501
running
> 12.2 (IP Plus)
> but it doesn't seem to know the encapsulation dot1q command.
>
> Does anyone know if the 2500 series supports dot
saw this one come through today.
I checked the link down at the bottom of the page. I thought it quite
interesting that Cisco and Microsoft are noted as "not vulnerable" while
just about every *nix out there is listed as "unknown" One sad note - my
firewall of choice is shown as "unknown" also.
I
once again, the public teaser issue of the Cook Report can be found here:
http://cookreport.com/11.11.shtml
for those considering the value of their certification pursuit or the
direction of their career possibilities, these are always interesting reads.
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing a
""Adam Frederick"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> has anyone had luck using any cisco series (8xx) routers to work with
> BellSouth's DSL service? It's not listed as a certified router/modem so I
> just wasn't sure. Any help would be appreciated.
you need to get
oops - forgot where I was going
here is a jump page
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/browse/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:NA
T
requires CCO customer login.
and this one for more detail in design and operation
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/browse/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:NA
T&s=I
if you have a CCO customer account, there are a lot of articles in the TAC
database
this one is a good start, I believe.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note0
9186a0080093fca.shtml
watch the wrap.
HTH
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
""Peter van Oene"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 06:24 PM 1/8/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >""Jenny McLeod"" wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lways willing to learn. So how would to OSPF routers be neighbors if
they are not adjacent? I appreciate they can be on the same link, just like
my own neighbors live on the same street. That doesn't mean there is a
relationship.
>
> JMcL
>
> The Long and Winding Road w
yes, here is a link on the Cisco web site:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin//Software/Crypto/crypto_main.pl
this should get you started.
HTH
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Thomas N."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> I plan
""John Brandis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> can you tell I am having fun with OSPF ??
> Any way, I am playing with OSPF on different network types. I wish to see
if
> i have a full adjacency or if I have only acheieved a neigbor state on
> certain t
sanitized configs would help immensely. including other subinterfaces that
work as well as the ones that don't. from both sides.
also, IOS versions, numbers of subinterfaces,etc.
thanks
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate)"" wrote in
mes
good points, Scott. Down there at the end I've added a couple of my own
experiences in the real world.
""s vermill"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> mlehr wrote:
> >
> > I have studied for and successfully tested CCNA & CCNP and now
> > I am studying
> > for the CC
""Firesox"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have two Arionet 350s, one is root bridge and the other is non-root
bridge
> without client.
> They are connecting two buildings.
>
> I am getting following messages and two bridges seems to lose
authentication
> very of
""William Li"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi group
>
>
>
>I just happened to find there is an advertise option could be added
> in "area area-id range ip-address mask" command. The command could be
> like this "area area-id range ip-address mask advertise".
just an FYI, since I may have to recertify this year and so looked it up
the following link will get you to a page on CCO that tells you what exam
you need for recertification. there is also a link to download some practice
tests.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/ex
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>snip>
> BTW, I do consider this a fundamentally silly discussion, but I think
> it's somewhat relevant for newbies to know that neither the cert nor
> the degree is the ultimate answer.
>
OK. I'll provide the
""Jay Greenberg"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What would be better suited to a large ISP's Gigabit Backbone?
> 6500 SUP2/MSFC2/PFC2 with CatOS or IOS? Is it just about personal
> preference or are there stability / usability issues?
in addition to the answers
;t in the header of
> > the data frame. They are in separate frames in the control plane.
> >
> > Which, to make a long and winding story short, probably
> > supports our theory that the Cisco HDLC sequence numbers are
> > not compressed. But it's not possib
""John Brandis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Resolved, thanks Chuck
>
> However, this is how I fixed it. I told the OSPF process on both router a
> and b, to put the actual interface into the ospf process, and not just
> listing the networks there. For example,
""John Brandis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> G'Day all
>
>snip the part answered elsewhere >
> Also, does OSPF make any assumptions about the network type if it is not
> specified, and if not, what are the default settings for OSPF interface
> network types ( h
check the ip of router A serial 0. if I am reading correctly, you have a
typo in the ospf network statement.
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""John Brandis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> G'Day all
>
> 1). Have 2 routers at the moment
but that's the case. I still hate the new site
> with a passion. They swear that it's supposed to be easier to use but
> it certainly is not, at least not yet. I'm sure we'll all get used to
> it and they'll eventually fix all the links, but as it stands right n
""cog"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> Bought all my own equipment for a CCNP/CCIE rack and I wan't to get others
> imput on the actual topology of the rack. What has motivated your rack
> topology? Does you rack Mimic the CCIE 1 Day lab Rack setup? Wha
""Waleed Sami"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> My client, a telco., has two network logically and physically seperated.
One
> that handle the business aspect of the operation: Customer services,
> billing...etc) and the other handles internet access, mail, office
>
Folks, we've had a lot of fun with the ongoing, never ending, and
repetitious threads about various non Cisco study / Cisco router and switch
topics. You know what they are / have been. I've enjoyed many of these off
topic posts as well. And I admit I have posted more than my share in this
category
""Jimmy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If you will given a choice, would you choose to go for PhD in networking
> area or juz stay in your field and pursuing profession certification such
as
> CCNP/CCDP etc. Assume that both is fully sponsored, can anyone tell me
L PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> How to search the TAC for IOS bugs?
>
> Thanks
> Wei
> - Original Message -
> From: "The Long and Winding Road"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 7:24 PM
> Subject: Re: revisited: OSPF stub/stub no-summary
problem solved.
> Don't know what is changed for nssa after 12.2, I tried encap ppp on
serial
> ports, and even cannot see any O*N2 entries.
>
> Thank you
> Wei
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "The Long and Winding Road"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, J
This one came up at the water cooler the other day.
When going through the design process, what factors are useful for
determining router and switch equipment requirements. In other words, how do
I know when it is time to upgrade my router? Not numbers and types of ports,
but what factors should b
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> WAN compression usually compresses the data payload. The HDLC sequence
> numbers are not in data packets; they are in keepalive packets. They are
in
> the control plane, not the user plane.
>
> I can't say fo
and ip assigned
> point-to point is the Link Data info in LSA, is that which causes the
problem?
>
> Chuck, thank you very much for you help, BTW, can you give me your IOS
> version? (Hopefully I am not tired yet of another try)
>
> Wei
>
> - Original Message -
> F
network point-to-point
>
> Do you agree with this ?
>
> Thanks for your help,
> BF
>
>
>
> ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote
> in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > ""Bruno Fernandes"" wro
""Bruno Fernandes"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> OK Rookie question
>
>
> I have 2 routers connected with a PPP link (serial)
>
> Router A in area 0
> Router B in area 20
>
> I have several loopback interfaces in Router B area 20 and announced as
> area 20, I hav
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 2:39 AM +0000 1/5/03, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >now that I've finished writing the post that I perceive is in my own best
>
changing the focus of the offshoot of the thread that refuses to die..
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
And why do I harp on power and money? Simple. Let's be brutally honest
> here. Why are most people even interested in the CCIE at all?Although
ould be pointers to the appropriate subroutine process for handling
OSPF packets received or sent on an interface.
sorry for the boring lecture.
Chuck
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message
""Brian"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> pix is a nat box, curious why youre doing that on the router??
> double nat can work, havent heard of it with this combo though.
in general, there is no reason that double nat will NOT work. I have a
customer network or tw
hey, Mark, thanks for the tip. I read Dennis' pdf, and checked out both the
web sites mentioned.
looks like this software has not been updated in quite a while. obviously it
is unsupported.
Chuck
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Vicuna, Mark"" wrote in message
[EMAI
Is it just me? More broken links? Harder to find the everyday tools?
lower - a LOT slower - navigating around?
Seems like just about every day I'm filling out one of those feedback forms
to report a problem. assuming I've found the basic page I'm looking for
anyway.
For example - check out the l
""neal r"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thanks to the fellows at http://www.optimumdata.com I'm going to have
> a lab with a mix of 72xx and 25xx available for the next week or two for
> MPLS playtime with an eye on finishing that portion of my CCIP.
>
>I've
""Geoff Zinderdine"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > to bring this back into the Cisco realm, Cisco NBAR ( network based
> > application recognition ) I believe was intended to provide another
> > dimension to the QoS classification process. now it can also be use
st all
clicks
> together with the little nuances he's placed in there. When I first got
this
> book I just thought of it as a command reference nothing more but it's
> really a good book that I would have never delved into without your
comment
> the other day. I'll be finis
ces
point-to-point? ) or artifact.
have you blown away the config, reloaded, then started from scratch? hate to
suggest the microsoft answer, but I am at a loss.
HTH
Chuck
> Thanks
> Wei
> - Original Message -
> From: "The Long and Winding Road"
> To:
> Sent:
As many of you know, I've been reading Parkhurst's OSPF book for a number of
reasons. So I'm fooling around in the chapter on interface commands, when
something hits me over the head.
authentication can be done on an interface by interface basis!
one of those things that I just never noticed befo
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 12:08 AM +0000 1/4/03, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >where you are going wrong is that you are pursuing your CCIE when you
should
> >be pursuing your degree
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Daren Presbitero"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> Had a question and been trying to figure this one out for a while now.
> I have a router with an internal 205.10.1.0/24 network hanging off o
where you are going wrong is that you are pursuing your CCIE when you should
be pursuing your degree ;->
refer to that other thread that just won't die.
sorry, I can't resist.
comment or two below:
""Rajesh Kumar"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello everybody.
maybe we can get nfr to weigh in here, and this thread can perpetuate itself
at least as long as the Cert versus Degree thread :->
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> &
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > At 3:53 PM + 1/3/03, Mr piyush shah wrote:
> > >
>snip some things>
> > >this question-answer forum . I thing we should stop
> > >it.There are lot many imp things on which we need to
> > >condcentrate more.
>
> And wha
ng resembling this problem in
the TAC bug database. Not that I read all of them :->
I don't have a solution, but I certainly admire the problem.
Chuck
- Original Message -----
From: "Wei Zhu"
To: "The Long and Winding Road"
Sent: Thursday, 02 January, 2003 7:48
RC the routers in question were 2621 -
different hardware beast.
live and learn.
> ..
>
> according to cisco ,this isn`t a fix just a work around
>
> H(and i mean HOPE)TH
>
> steve skinner
> (CCxx MCxx HPxx SCxx CSxx.you know i wish i had some proper certs and
> not
RC the routers in question were 2621 -
different hardware beast.
live and learn.
> ..
>
> according to cisco ,this isn`t a fix just a work around
>
> H(and i mean HOPE)TH
>
> steve skinner
> (CCxx MCxx HPxx SCxx CSxx.you know i wish i had some proper certs and
> not
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This discussion could tie into the "New Technologies" thread! Technologies
> that do a better job of protecting users from viruses could be big. And an
> even harder problem is protecing us from spam. None of
""Brian"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> lying on a visa app, lovely...
I am shocked and amazed to learn that people lie on their resumes, their job
applications, their credit card applications, and their visa applications.
I am even more shocked and amazed to l
ay down. Just my opinion.
HTH
Chuck
>
> Robert
> ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
> message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > >
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> I am having trouble with what appears to be a simple problem. I have a
small
> office and I
> have a friend who owns a building not to far away. I am goin to order a T1
> to the internet from my location and
> a PPP T1 to hi
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Characterize the major conceptual differences among the FORTH, FORTRAN
if memory serves, FORTH requires that programmers be from another planet, or
at least have spent substantial parts of their lives on
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear Friends,
>
>
> I have strange problem at hands. I have 2 Serial Sync 64kbps links
> connecting to 2 different places. The problem is one of the link start
> dropping packets (after 3 hrs) moment both the links are put one ANY ONE
I picked up William Parkhurst's book Cisco OSPF Command and Configuration
Handbook for the sole reason that I own and have used with great success his
BGP book of similar title. BGP has been my most successful section in the
CCIE lab twice now, with my most recent result being perfect, due entirely
A take off on an old joke
In 9:00 a.m.
Work was beginning.
CIO: What happen ?
Net Manager: Somebody set up us the spanning tree
Help Desk Operator: We get signal
CIO: What !
Help Desk Operator: Main speakerphone turn on
CIO: It's You !!
Hacker: How are you gentlemen !!
Hacker: All your switch port
""Wei Zhu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The Router connections are as following, R1 has 1 frame relay circuit to
R2,
> R2 has 2 frame relay circuits to R3, R2 is the ABR, R1 in Area 0, and R3
in
> area 1.
>R1
>/
> /
> R2
> / /
>
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 3:57 PM + 1/1/03, Peter van Oene wrote:
> > >I would just like to reiterate that the graduate degree (master's or
PhD)
> >>provides you a whole lot more flexibility than the CCIE ever can. With
a
> >>g
""chris kane"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> So I'm beginning my IE studies and had a thought. I wonder just how many
> commands there are. Throw out the 3550s, and just how many commands are
> possible on the 2600/3600 12.1 series IOS.?.
which image? ;->
>
this is beginning to sound like a job for TTCP
Check out:
http://www.netcraftsmen.net/id27.htm
for information about this process. I know it is supported on Cisco routers,
although I've not played with it much.
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Priscilla Oppenheimer
""James Gruggett"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Here is the situation:
>
> I have a 1700 series router and a T1, a cisco switch, and a file server.
>
> I am removing both Exchage and IIS services.
>
> How should I configure my router?
console or telent into it
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We should also ask developers how they test their labs. An untested lab
> won't work. Most developers learn this the hard way. I've worked with many
> developers who have "learned it the hard way" over and ov
""Jenny McLeod"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I came across this on a completely non-IT mailing list. Thought some
might
> be amused by it.
>
> An interesting tech support problem...
>
> The phone rings: tech support: "hello computer tech support " customer:
> "
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 3:00 AM + 12/29/02, Lan Wong wrote:
> >Greetings,
> >
>snip some things>
> I'll also throw out a general question. A post not long ago asked to
> compare the labs of one vendor versus another, and I am
I've run into this situation while doing some practicing with the 3550s and
some routers
2611--3550---35503640
all ethernet ports are set at full duplex 10 megabit speed.
the 2611 and the 3640 are connected via a vlan tunnel.
everything is working fine, until I turn on l2protoco
""neal r"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've been looking at the pages on the Cat 3550 and I can't tell if
> this thing will handle the entire range of possibilites that the modular
> QoS CLI provides, or if there are some hardware limits on numbers of
> queues,
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""Peter Walker"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hmm that last message didnt seem to get throu
201 - 300 of 487 matches
Mail list logo
