Of course, if you're in the UK, you are (I think) probably using ETSI ISDN,
so the physical config would actually be something like...
controller E1 0
clock source line primary
pri-group timeslots 1-31
interface Serial0:15
isdn switch-type primary-net5
! rest of interface config...
That's
Just catching up after holidays... sorry for the late reply.
I have recently been dealing with the same issue on a 3725.
It's a bug. CSCea56403 and others.
We upgraded to 12.3(1a) and it went away...
JMcL
Joseba Izaga wrote:
Hi,
Do you now the reason of the folowing message:
11:31:40:
I agree with Ronnie - sounds like the router isn't seeing any interesting
traffic. show dialer can provide useful information. Depending on what
IOS version you're running, it may show the time until disconnect. If you
have more or less constant interesting traffic, it should stay near 120
Not necessarily the case for basic-net3 switch type.
I have seen basic rate ETSI interfaces actuallly appear to be dead - at L1
as well as L2. Put a call through and up it comes. Pain in the neck,
because you can't tell if the service is cactus without actually making a
call. If anyone has any
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
At 1:40 AM + 1/8/03, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
William Li wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi group
I just happened to find there is an advertise option
could be added
in area area-id range ip-address mask
Have you checked the underlying PVC? show frame pvc, debug frame lmi, beat
up carrier?
I have seen PVCs misconfigured by the carrier so they connected to
*somewhere*, so the sub-interface was up... but the PVC wasn't connected to
the service it was supposed to be connected to, so not much was
Going back to something from the previous thread...
(LaWR wrote...)
BTW, I am not so sure I agree that lab writing is a CCIE skill set. I'd
like
you to elaborate more on why you believe that the ability to write a good
lab is indicative of CCIE level skill. Maybe some other folks have some
A late addition to the thread...
Priscilla is correct about using full duplex if it's a point to point link -
as long as the other end supports full duplex - not all of the older routers
do.
Another point to note is that the reported reliability of this link is only
250/255. Anything less than
Going through the old posts...
You may need to get your ISDN provider to set this up. It may be an extra
cost feature.
If it's working, you should be able to see the number using show isdn
active or similar. It may depend on the switch type for all I know - I'm
used to ETSI.
JMcL
I came across this on a completely non-IT mailing list. Thought some might
be amused by it.
An interesting tech support problem...
The phone rings: tech support: hello computer tech support customer:
hello my computer was making a strange hissing noise last night and this
morning when I turned
Has anyone used any network modelling tools, or end to end (performance)
monitoring tools, that are actually suitable for a large network (more WAN
than LAN) with many diverse and non-standard applications? I.e., are there
any tools out there that are actually SCALABLE, and cope with more than
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
John Tafasi wrote in message
news:200211141056.KAA04663;groupstudy.com...
Hi,
I have a cisco 2516 router with an ethernet interface. How
can I find out
if
this inteface is full duplex or half duplex?
plug it into a full duplex 100 mbs switch port
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Peter van Oene wrote:
Nov 14 11:51:14.121 ESuT: OSPF: Rcv DBD from x.x.x.x on
Channel6/0 seq
0x3DCDF2DA opt 0x2 flag 0x7 len 32 mtu 0 state EXCHANGE
Nov 14 11:51:14.121 ESuT: OSPF: Send DBD to x.x.x.x on
Channel6/0 seq
0x3DCDF2DA opt 0x42 flag
OK, I'll admit this is a real-life problem, not strictly a study question.
I have a couple of OSPF adjacencies that refuse to start up. Just to make
this entertaining, these are not router to router - they are Cisco to
mainframe, over a CIP.
Five IP stacks neighbour the router - two are OK, three
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Jenny McLeod wrote:
OK, I'll admit this is a real-life problem, not strictly a
study question.
I have a couple of OSPF adjacencies that refuse to start up.
Just to make this entertaining, these are not router to router
- they are Cisco to mainframe
also be a
priority issue if the network is a broadcast/nbma network where
neither is
being elected a DR? Finally, could a checksum be bad?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Jenny McLeod wrote in message
news:200211140127.BAA14210;groupstudy.com...
OK, I'll admit this is a real-life problem
_ OneZero543 _ wrote:
Why Not Try - IP OSPF MTU-IGNORE on the router(s). Don't try
matching 4096.
Later
'Cause I think it would have to be put on the mainframe end, and I doubt
that such a knob exists there.
In any case, since this is *not* a Cisco to Cisco connection, but Cisco to
Connie Nie wrote:
Hi, group!
I have been trying to figure out how dialer remote-name is
used/or not
used in the ppp process but without success. Here is what I
understand the
ppp chap process work:
R1 calls R2
R2 challenges R1. Together with the random no and seq. no, r2
also send its
Hmm.. configs and routing tables might give a clue.
My guess is that your serial line is still seen as the preferred route.
By the way, be aware that depending on the bandwidth of your serial link,
and your configuration, the extra bandwidth of the ISDN may be more
hindrance than help. I haven't
Congratulations, Symon.
Top Down Network Design is a good read, period. It's not specifically
oriented towards the CCDx exams, but it's very useful for that anyway.
JMcL
Symon Thurlow wrote:
Hi all,
Phew, 2nd time around passed support no problem. The first time
I
underestimated the
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Jenny McLeod wrote:
I obviously have no idea what has been proposed for the US
elections. However, at the last ACT (Australian Capital
Territory) election in 2001, a trial of electronic voting was
held, and was generally considered to be a success. More
Ah, but only the Melburnians get the holiday - the rest of us just find
radios or TVs at work...
JMcL
Symon Thurlow wrote:
That always makes me laugh, having a day off to watch a horse
race :)
-Original Message-
From: Jenny McLeod [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com]
Sent: 04
I obviously have no idea what has been proposed for the US elections.
However, at the last ACT (Australian Capital Territory) election in 2001, a
trial of electronic voting was held, and was generally considered to be a
success. More information, including a technical description of how it
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
For those United States residents, Tuesday is election day. No
politics
here. No flames here. You have a right and a privilege that is
rare in
today's world. Please take the appropriate amount of time to
get to your
polling place and exercise the right
Judging by where in the sequence the disconnect comes, have you tried
turning on debug ppp auth? On the remote end as well, if you can. Mind
you, I'm not sure why, on the configs given, the first two channels would
come up if that was the problem.
JMcL
Dwayne Saunders wrote:
Hi all can any
. which of course cannot be
done.
obviously, you are talking about summarizing area 0 routes into
a non-zero
area, which of course, does work just fine.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
Jenny McLeod wrote in message
news:200210290538.FAA14601;groupstudy.com...
The Long and Winding
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
Jenny McLeod wrote in message
news:200210280429.EAA24675;groupstudy.com...
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
[snipped]
area 0 range 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 area not working on
ABR
either
CL: well, area 0 range is an illegal command. you
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
[snipped]
area 0 range 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 area not working on ABR
either
CL: well, area 0 range is an illegal command. you may be able
to enter it,
but it does nothing. the area range command is design to
summarize non
backbone routes into the
I haven't taken any Cisco exams lately so can't comment on the wording, but
to be honest trying to figure out which answer is less wrong sounds like a
lot of my day to day work...
JMcL
Roberts, Larry wrote:
Are you sure you haven't taken any of the Cisco Exams ? You
almost nailed it
John,
Yes, and No. We still run IPX over our network (don't ask).
JMcL
John Brandis wrote:
Hi Jenny,
Is your carrier Telstra ?
Do you use Telstra TPIPS for your cloud/next hop router ?
John
Sydney, Australia
-Original Message-
From: Jenny McLeod [mailto:nobody
Depends on the frame switch, I think.
I asked our telco about this as well (quite a while ago), and they said that
on entry to the cloud, they automatically reset any DE bits set.
So either way, your scheme isn't likely to work, but how much of a negative
effect it has will depend on whether your
I'm not quite clear on what your criteria are, but it sounds like floating
static routes might suit you (and change the idle-timeout value for the ISDN
to ten minutes). Floating static routes are routes with a high
administrative distance, that are normally overridden by another route
(usually
Whether you can get the CIR via LMI depends on the LMI type you are using.
If you're using ANSI Annex D, it's not sent, and I know of no way of getting
the info from the router.
JMcL
MADMAN wrote:
Well thru LMI you can get the CIR and if the CIR is above 56K
you can
safely assume you have a
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
DQoS test on Monday. Let's see if I pass of rail!
some thoughts below
JMcL: and more thoughts from me...
--
Adam Broad wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
I have a 1720 router connected to a 3640 router by leased
Are you pinging directly from the router where the QoS stuff is configured,
or are the pings going through the router?
JMcL
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
the continuing saga of QoS configuration and testing
As near as I can tell, ping testing is utterly useless as a
means of testing
Actually, this looks consistent to me. At least as consistent as anything
else Cisco does.
Changing the hello interval drives changes to the dead interval, but not the
reverse.
If the dead interval is set to the default (four times hello interval), and
you change the hello interval, you will
This may not be relevant since it's just the socket that changes, but you
don't have another workstation with a duplicate address, do you? I have
seen similar symptoms from that.
JMcL
Ole D Jensen wrote:
Thanks Priscilla for a very good explanation.
The numbers were just made up, but it
intervention happening
there in context of servicing their customers.
MV
-Original Message-
From: Jenny McLeod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2002 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT - ISDN viability - WAS: Re: VPDN - ISDN
problem
[7
Many many moons ago, we had a bug where routers leaked memory (so we
periodically rebooted them - about every week, I think). I think it was IOS
10.0 on an AGS+, though, so I doubt you'd come across that particular bug
very often these days ;-)
I work on the theory that unless there appears to
Hell yeah.
We use ISDN to automatically failover. With over 350 remote sites, it's not
uncommon to have a main link to an office fail somewhere.
With automatic failover, our users often don't even know something's
failed. Manual intervention? You've got to be kidding. To tweak and tune
if
I'm having a problem with some ISDN channels.
We use ISDN as a failover for other services. The ISDN is on a AS5300 (IOS
12.1) - note that this is ETSI (switch type primary-net5).
Lots of dialer interfaces, load thresholds set, ppp multilink used. The
AS5300 dials the remote sites. 60 channels
I haven't actually done this in production, but at various times when
testing, I have noticed that if you have multiple dialer strings on the one
dialer interface, the first string will be dialled, and then if that fails,
the second string will be dialled, and so on.
I suspect that what you want
It's not specific to ISDN.
By default, when you do a show int, you will see a 5 minute input rate
and 5 minute output rate. The load figures are calculated over five
minutes (I believe it's an exponentially decaying algorithm or something
similar, not a straight average).
These load figures
Neal Rauhauser wrote:
BGP is funny with RIB-failure, OSPF is weird with dropping
subnets
that are visible elsewhere in a simple network, NAT some times
explodes
depending on version, EIGRP is a little screwy, and now I've
got a truly
exceptional problem :-(
I've got a working async
j wrote:
I'm afraid it's true...
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/UTCS/notices/dijkstra/ewdobit.html
Jenny McLeod wrote:
I received a rumour that Edsger Dijkstra, known for his
dislike
of Goto statements as much as for the shortest path first
algorithm, has died. I haven't been able
Henry D. wrote:
That would work if you have integrated CSU, the timeslots would
be there.
If you connect say with V.35 to an external CSU/DSU then you
won't get the
timeslot information. The only way to figure out the bandwidth
then would be
to stress-test the circuit and see how far you
Hi all,
I have just been battling a rather odd routing(?) problem.
I have a 2621XM router, which has an ethernet segment attached. This router
is connected to an AS5300 via a modem connected to the aux port. The AS5300
has other connections. Both routers have loopback interfaces configured.
eo wrote:
On Tuesday 30 July 2002 07:59 pm, Dimitrije wrote:
I would like to connect 2 routers with a back-to-back frame
relay WAN
conection,
but I don't have the DCE-DTE back-to-back cable. Each router
does however
have
T1 WICs.
My question is can I connect the routers
Kris Keen wrote:
Your summary addresses will be configured on your ABR's, these
summary's will be propagated to area 0. So your summarys will
be on Sydney/Brisbane/Melbourne using the area range command
HTH
Kris
Why would you have summaries on all three?
If the connection to the
a starting point. Try using sh int stat and sh
int switching
and other show commands to watch for traffic.
-Original Message-
From: Jenny McLeod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 4:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Strange ping failures [7:50249]
Hi
Kris Keen wrote:
If you have networks in brisbane, would you not summarise those
at the brisbane abr?
I think i have the wrong diagram in my head :)
I think we just have different diagrams in our heads.
And they're probably both different to what John has in mind ;-)
But we seem to agree
Shane Stockman wrote:
I currently have 2 point to point links ruuning to the same
place using
eigrp as the routing protocol.I have added a isdn bri as backup
but I don't
want the isdn to kick in until both the point to point links
drop.
There is a serious routing issue with have 1 link
I assume you mean using BGP?
I have absolutely no experience with BGP at all, so this could be way off
base, but which direction are the links unbalanced in - for incoming
traffic, outgoing traffic, or both?
If it's traffic from you to the provider that is not shared evenly, then
have a look at
Can you use floating static routes instead?
JMcL
Mr. Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA wrote:
Hi group,
Who have used the 'standby track serial 0' command
before, while configuring HSRP.
I tried it and was disappointed because, my two
upstream providers are connected via a radio
Thanks Priscilla.
I thought that would be the case. In fact, digging around a bit more, I'm
not even sure if a triggered update would be sent. 'clear ipx route *'
causes RIP/SAP general requests on all IPX interfaces, according to the
command reference. But I think that would just cause RT2 to
8000 bytes = 64000 bits. What speed is your ISDN channel? How long will
it take a ping to get to the other side and back? How long is your
timeout?
I expect that if you increase the timeout you will see your pings return.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 09
, HSRP, etc), and most of the commands in books won't work,
and you will want to upgrade it anyway. Many of the commands have changed
since 9.1.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 04/04/2001
05:55 pm ---
"RamG" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@grou
g
IPX), it can also refer to two IP protocols routing for separate IP domains
on a single router." (or, presumably, two IPX protocols routing for
separate IPX domains...)
As far as I can see, you can apply the term equally well to routed or
routing protocols.
JMcL
-- Forwarde
/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/dial_r/drdrisla.htm#1030992
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 05/04/2001
11:31 am ---
"Buri, Heather H" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 05/04/2001
01:26:27 am
Please respond to "
RFCs 3091 (Pi Digit Generation Protocol) and 3092 (Etymology of Foo) are
also quite enlightening.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 03/04/2001
09:05 am ---
Daniel Cotts [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 03/04/2001 01:39:06
am
Please
is in minutes)
ipx update-time x (for RIP updates - x is in seconds)
An unusual instance of Cisco actually making the IOS commands more intuitive (or at
least more consistent) instead of less!
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 21/03/2001
08:56 am
John Hardman wrote:
Hi
Well lets start out by saying I have worked with FR for many years, so let
me share my pain with you.
First, FR is not redundent, and in and of it's self can not be made
redundent. There are several things one can do to help bring up the "up
time" with a FR network.
[snipped]
When I was doing WAN engineering in Australia, there was a very
cost-effective nailed-up Basic Rate ISDN service that you might also want
to
research.
[more snipped]
You'd be referring to Telstra's Semi-Permanent Connections (SPCs). They
were available on Microlink services.
of the 2610s using 12.1? Are you using ISDN as well as frame? Any IOS
problems? I'm planning on using a few in situations that may be quite
similar to yours, and would welcome any feedback you have.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 16/03/2001
11:34 am
for the day -
aveagoodweekend...
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 16/03/2001
04:55 pm ---
"John Brandis" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on
16/03/2001 12:31:35 pm
Please respond to "John Brandis" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent b
ation of
Internet numbers, and provides additional information on research and
educational networks."
For what it's worth...
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 09/03/2001
08:39 am ---
Daniel Cotts [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 09/03/200
in? Was 'no shut' the first or last thing you did?
If the problem is with the negotiation process itself, then you can
probably stop pestering the telco and start pestering the TAC instead.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 09/03/2001
09:01 am
Try using 'debug dialer', and 'debug isdn q931' (on both routers). Is the
router *attempting* to dial? If so, is the call being seen by the other
router?
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 05/03/2001
11:36 am ---
"Santosh Koshy&qu
even brief examples. And it only covers IOS, not the
various switch interfaces.
If you want a *small* reference book to include all that, expect a very
small font.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 02/03/2001
08:28 am ---
Daniel Cotts
the ABR is probably your best bet - it sounds like your
7513 can cope with it (check your memory usage as well, though).
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 01/03/2001
08:38 am ---
"John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on
you're trying to do.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 27/02/2001
08:57 am ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 27/02/2001 01:22:26 am
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL
by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 26/02/2001
09:29 am ---
"Howard C. Berkowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 24/02/2001 06:54:15
am
Please respond to "Howard C. Berkowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Su
into a routing protocol on that router, (false) knowledge of your 'test'
network may suddenly appear all over the place.
Use with caution and knowledge of *your* network, and don't blame me if you
break something :-)
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 26/02/2001
09
obviously using an E1 PRI if you've got 30 active
channels, so the d-channel is :15.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 23/02/2001
08:38 am ---
"Stephen D Skinner" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on
23/02/2001 05:11:09 am
Plea
and claim that as the bandwidth, because they can claim a higher bandwidth
that way. But in my opinion it's more useful to say it's 100 mb full
duplex, and that tends to still be the standard, particularly for serial
links.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 23/02/2001
of traffic?
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 15/02/2001
01:37 pm ---
Adam Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 15/02/2001 05:31:40 am
Please respond to Adam Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
that are not
covered in any of the CCNP exams, unless you go for the specialisations.
If this is why you're doing certification, you may as well do both.
My 2c - YMMV
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 15/02/2001
03:54 pm ---
"James" [EMAIL
used the excuse " but
somebody on the web told me it was OK to claim this..."
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 15/02/2001
05:05 pm ---
"Steve Barone" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 15/02/2001 12:12:50 pm
Please resp
and test it under something approaching *your* network
conditions.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 12/02/2001
11:48 am ---
"West, Karl" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 10/02/2001
02:27:14 am
Please respond to "Wes
the 'either'
and just look at outgoing load.
However, over ppp multilink, the 'inbound' and 'either' options do work.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 12/02/2001
03:56 pm ---
"Adam Burgess" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 11/02/200
nds.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 08/02/2001
08:40 am ---
"Leigh Anne Chisholm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 08/02/2001
05:13:04 am
Please respond to "Leigh Anne Chisholm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTE
So... if you hit enter after all these messages have completed, what
happens?
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 08/02/2001
08:56 am ---
Cisco Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 08/02/2001
01:27:56 am
Please respond to Cisco
More comments inline
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 08/02/2001
11:54 am ---
John Neiberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 08/02/2001 04:24:17
am
Please respond to John Neiberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 07/02/2001
08:50 am ---
Jim Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 07/02/2001 04:36:35
am
Please respond to Jim Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Liwanag, Manolito" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"'Ci
255.255.255.0 dialer1
Ping the address of your route - e.g 1.2.3.4 for the above route. If
you've used a 'fake' address, the ping won't work, but it should bring up
the ISDN link anyway.
This is just basic routing stuff, so I assume it would work with 12.1.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny
A couple of weeks ago I was looking for an alternative to 'show dialer' to
display the value of the idle timer in IOS 12.1 on an AS5300.
I found an answer. For those who are interested, 'show int' now shows the
information (at least on an AS5300). It is also much easier to determine
which
Without checking too deeply...
Try changing BRI 1/1 to associate with dialer rotary-group 2 instead of
rotary-group 1. Your dialer 2 interface isn't being used at the moment.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 30/01/2001
04:05 pm
My memory of Tolkien Ring is a touch rusty, but I believe "One ring to rule
them all, one ring to find them" implies a rather hierarchical protocol.
"One ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them" I would say
rules out the use of fibre.
JMcL
-
You could try buying hardware :-)
An expensive way of getting a CD, but I believe they still whack them in
with every box (sort of like the free steak knives)
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 29/01/2001
02:21 pm ---
"Bob Vance&qu
The formatting makes it a bit confusing, but they look to me like
completely separate log messages - look at the timestamps.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 29/01/2001
02:12 pm ---
"Roberts, Timothy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@grou
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 23/01/2001
09:17 pm ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 23/01/2001 03:05:02 pm
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: But isn't that the routers job???
Hey
? What platform? What shows up with
'show dialer'?
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 22/01/2001
09:14 am ---
"Erick B." [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 19/01/2001 05:04:31 pm
Please respond to "Erick B." [EM
connection to the internal network, and inviting a third party to use it,
could be a seriously career limiting move.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 19/01/2001
11:19 am ---
Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 19/01/2001
09
In IOS 11.2, a 'show dialer' shows the time until disconnect, as below...
Serial2/0:9 - dialer type = ISDN
Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs)
Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs)
Dialer state is physical layer up
Interface bound to profile Dialer1
Time until disconnect
. But it works, and sometimes
it's the only option. And it's VERY good practice for remembering commands
and what output they produce ;-)
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 19/01/2001
04:38 pm ---
"Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 18/01/2001
09:41 am ---
"Frank" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 16/01/2001 12:30:52 am
Please respond to "Frank" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
It implies that there
are essentially two different formulae:
[k1*BW + (k2 * BW)/(256-load) + k3 * delay] * [k5/(reliability + k4)] if k5
0, and
[k1*BW + (k2 * BW)/(256-load) + k3 * delay] if k5 = 0.
I agree with you on the maths :-)
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 16/
in working
around the problems caused by using 'illegal' addresses. Sooner or later
we're probably going to have to readdress, but personally I'm hoping
somebody comes up with some other solution ;-)
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 16/01/2001
12:37 pm
this
will probably be resolved by the time this hits the list anyway :-)
Dennis, why do you think the address is wrong? It looks OK from the
information you've given us...
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 16/01/2001
04:39 pm ---
"
Go Raiders??? But the rugby league season hasn't started yet :-)
Studying - no.
Watching cricket (on the weekend, anyway) - yes.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 15/01/2001
10:34 am ---
"Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@grou
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
