Just catching up after holidays... sorry for the late reply.
I have recently been dealing with the same issue on a 3725.
It's a bug. CSCea56403 and others.
We upgraded to 12.3(1a) and it went away...
JMcL
Joseba Izaga wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Do you now the reason of the folowing message:
>
> 11:31
ully enabled it. Try to disable
>it and see the results.
>
>HTH
>
>Vikram
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Joseba Izaga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 6:26 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Error on an interface FastEthernet of
, 2003 6:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Error on an interface FastEthernet of a router 3745 [7:72610]
Hi,
Do you now the reason of the folowing message:
11:31:40: %GT96K_FEWAN-5-UNDERFLOW: Transmit underflow on int
FastEthernet0/0
11:31:40: %GT96K_FEWAN-5-UNDERFLOW: Transmit underflow on int
cut and pasted from:
Error Message Decoder
Transmit underflow on int [chars]
While a frame was being transmitted, the local buffer of the GT96K
controller chip received insufficient data because data could not be
transferred to the chip fast enough to keep pace with its output rate.
Normally, such
hi,
This type of error usually means that part of the paket being transmitted
was not available while the interface started transmitting.
regards,
gab
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72619&t=72610
--
FAQ, list arch
Hi,
Do you now the reason of the folowing message:
11:31:40: %GT96K_FEWAN-5-UNDERFLOW: Transmit underflow on int
FastEthernet0/0
11:31:40: %GT96K_FEWAN-5-UNDERFLOW: Transmit underflow on int
FastEthernet0/0
This is configuration I have on the interface
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 63.
Does anyone know the URL on CCO where the information about MTU sizes
and limitations of fast Ethernet interfaces (routers only) can be found?
The default is 1500 which it seems can not be exceeded however commands
within the IOS would indicate the MTU size could
be change to allow greater pa
Hi all,
I just setup vlan trunk at a fastethernet port of a Cisco 7200 router and it
running IOS 12.1. If I have 5 vlan at the fastethernet port, then I create 5
sub-interface at that fastethernet port. Can I use SNMP to get network
utilization of each sub-interface (vlan) ?
Regards,
Dovelet
This may be too basic, but I know that a bad cable can sometimes give an
erroneous link light. If pins 1 & 2 are good but 3 & 6 not, it will give you
a link light but you won't be able to receive data. . . ??
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39429&t=39406
hi all,
i can't ping to any host in the LAN although the fa0/0 shows up,up. sh int
fa0/0 described that there was a tremendous amount of interface reset, and
input rate is 0 what does it mean..? i did a shut/no shut on the the
interface fa0/0, then only i can ping to all LAN hosts...anybody pls
e
Great answer. One minor thing. ISL came first. It was designed by Kalpana
years ago. Cisco bought Kalpana in the mid-1990s.
Priscilla
At 10:53 AM 2/14/02, Oleg Oz wrote:
>Mike, yes the IEEE802.1Q does insert the VLAN tag into the frame (ISL
>encapsulates the frame.) I am going to try and get th
At 09:38 AM 2/14/02, Michael Williams wrote:
>Oleg Oz wrote:
> > The originally ethernet
> > chips used in cisco network modules only supported a fixed
> > frame size. When ISL/802.1Q came along, the hardware needed to
> > support some additional space to accomadate the VLAN info.
>
>I could see t
Mike, yes the IEEE802.1Q does insert the VLAN tag into the frame (ISL
encapsulates the frame.) I am going to try and get this part right. The max
frame size for an ethernet frame is 1518, however if you are going to insert
the 801.1Q Vlan tag you would require an additional 4 bytes.
2 by
Oleg Oz wrote:
> The originally ethernet
> chips used in cisco network modules only supported a fixed
> frame size. When ISL/802.1Q came along, the hardware needed to
> support some additional space to accomadate the VLAN info.
I could see this as being an explanation. But doesn't Dot1Q fit into
I also belive that it is possible to run isl/802.1Q over ethernet. I
seem to remember reading that the limiting factor was the age of the
ethernet hardware. The originally ethernet chips used in cisco network
modules only supported a fixed frame size. When ISL/802.1Q came along, the
hardware neede
I had read (and understood) that you needed FastEthernet for ISL trunking.
I'm not for sure about Dot1Q though. It appears from the post from MADMAN,
that you can indeed perform Dot1Q on Ethernet ports. But I still think
FastEthernet
I read a post in this thread that on a 2900 switch so
t; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]
>
> Hello
>
> I have been doing some reading on VLANs and Trunking and have read
> conflicting information. Can you use a 10Mbs Ethernet interface when
> running ISL or 801.1q or does the interface have to be Fas
Hi Colin,
I have configured a port on a 2900 for 10Mbit and half duplex, and it lets
me issue the command 'switchport trunk encapsulation isl' without any
problems. On CatOS switches, you can issue the command 'show port
capabilities', which will tell you the capabilities of each port.
Regards,
In the book that I read it says that you can only use fast ethernet or gig
ethernet
-Original Message-
From: Colin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]
Hello
I have been doing some reading
SL or 801.1q or does the interface have to be FastEthernet?
> Some books/articles I've read say you must use at least a FastEthernet
> interface and others say you can use an Ethernet interface. Note: this
> is for my CCNP lab studies, not a production network.
>
> Thanks
>
when
> running ISL or 801.1q or does the interface have to be FastEthernet?
> Some books/articles I've read say you must use at least a FastEthernet
> interface and others say you can use an Ethernet interface. Note: this
> is for my CCNP lab studies, not a production network.
>
>
ISL requires Fast ethernet.
J
-Original Message-
From: Colin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]
Hello
I have been doing some reading on VLANs and Trunking and have read
conflicting
Hello
I have been doing some reading on VLANs and Trunking and have read
conflicting information. Can you use a 10Mbs Ethernet interface when
running ISL or 801.1q or does the interface have to be FastEthernet?
Some books/articles I've read say you must use at least a FastEthernet
inte
steve
>From: "David C Prall"
>Reply-To: "David C Prall"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Fastethernet failover [7:21177]
>Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:54:45 -0400
>
>I'd start looking at IRB.
>
>David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcp
I'd start looking at IRB.
David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Smith"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:43 PM
Subject: Fastethernet failover [7:21177]
> Hey gang this may sound strange but it was just
Hey gang this may sound strange but it was just a thought. I have a 3640
that has two separate Ethernet interfaces. I have one that runs into one
of our cats running HSRP. Is there a way to run the second one to the
other cat as a fail over path? Can this be done with weights or anything
like that
2610 with 10baseT and can verify this?
>
> Chuck
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:41 PM
> To: Chuck Larrieu
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sub-interface on Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:19
-interface on Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:19394]
I don't want to do much of anything except make sure my customers are
served, and then collect a paycheck as my reward. :->
What I stated is that ISL/802.1q trunking can, according to one of my pals,
be done on 10baseT ports ( e.g. a 2501 ) when
ces
in my response.
anyone got 12.2 code on a 2501 or a 2610 with 10baseT and can verify this?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:41 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sub-interface on Ethernet or Fas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jeff Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sub-interface on Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:19394]
>
> Jimmy,
> I don't see why it would not work on an Ethernet interface when it does on
> FastEt
on Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:19394]
Jimmy,
I don't see why it would not work on an Ethernet interface when it does on
FastEthernet, but I don't have one to test on right now. Give it a shot, it
should work.
Jeff
>From: "Jimmy Leong"
>Reply-To: "Jimmy Leong&q
Jimmy,
I don't see why it would not work on an Ethernet interface when it does on
FastEthernet, but I don't have one to test on right now. Give it a shot, it
should work.
Jeff
>From: "Jimmy Leong"
>Reply-To: "Jimmy Leong"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
.
Some people told me that we can only create sub-interface on FastEthernet
and NOT Ethernet ( 10Base ). Is it true ? What is the minimum IOS version
should I use ?
cheers
Jimmy
>From: "Jeff Smith"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: sub-inter
You certainly can
Dave
Jimmy Leong wrote:
>
> Hi all :
>
> Can anyone enlighten me whether I can create sub-interface on Ethernet
> or FastEthernet.
>
> thanks in advance
>
> regards
> Jimmy
>
> _
Certainly can. Used often when routing between vlans when the router is
external to the switch (non- rsm, msfc, etc)- the old "router on a stick"
scenario.
>From: "Jimmy Leong"
>Reply-To: "Jimmy Leong"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: sub-inte
You should be able to do this with ISL.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/switch_r/xrswcmd.pdf
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19403&t=19394
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscri
Hi all :
Can anyone enlighten me whether I can create sub-interface on Ethernet
or FastEthernet.
thanks in advance
regards
Jimmy
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Message
t: Re: isl encapsulation over fastethernet sub interface [7:18401]
You need a 100 MB port to perform trunking. I've never heard of a 2610 with
a 100 MB ethernet. My experience has been they are 10MB ethernet and you
cannot trunk with them...
Dennis
""Jagan Krishnaraj"" wrote
CTED]...
> hi all
>
> can anybody help me.
>
> i have a catalyst 5505 connected to a 2610 fastethernet
> interface. vlans are configured in the catalyst and are trunked
> to the fa interface.
>
> in the fa interface subinterfaces encapsulation for vlans are
> created in
PROTECTED]
""Jagan Krishnaraj"" a icrit dans le message news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hi all
>
> can anybody help me.
>
> i have a catalyst 5505 connected to a 2610 fastethernet
> interface. vlans are configured in the catalyst and are trunked
> to the fa interface.
naraj"" a icrit dans le message news:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > hi all
> >
> > can anybody help me.
> >
> > i have a catalyst 5505 connected to a 2610 fastethernet
> > interface. vlans are configured in the catalyst and are trunked
> > to the fa inte
hi all
can anybody help me.
i have a catalyst 5505 connected to a 2610 fastethernet
interface. vlans are configured in the catalyst and are trunked
to the fa interface.
in the fa interface subinterfaces encapsulation for vlans are
created in the router.
but still router does not connect to
How
Can someone help me how i can configured a ethernet or a fastethernet
interface as a DHCP client, for that the interface gets a ip address
from the DHCP server.
This is actually a new features but i dont know on which IOS version.
When someone has a idea that would be very great.
Regards
th ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
> > > > ethernet card in first router),
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM
> > To: Farhan Ahmed
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM
> To: Farhan Ahmed
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
>
>
>
> It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with
> the same configuration with other route
: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Here right now I am testing on only one interface, imagine If I have 10
WAN and 2 ethernet.. Then This kind of setting will be useful. We
generally follow it, so it was there.. What is the wrong in that ?
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote
what do u mean by safe side?
-Original Message-
From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:04 PM
To: Farhan Ahmed
Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Nothing Actually second line is not required if we are defining the
first
.
Thanks,
Kiran
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
> cAN U SEND YR CONFIGS
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM
> To: Farhan Ahmed
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Problem with Fas
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM
To: Farhan Ahmed
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is perfectly working with
the same configuration with other router with out any changes.
Than
cAN U SEND YR CONFIGS
-Original Message-
From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:40 PM
To: Farhan Ahmed
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
It is not at all the routing problem. Because it is
d more rotes in both direc
> on the other vlans u should have static routes to router via x
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kiran Kumar M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Problem with Fastet
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Thanks for your mail.
No, the default route is already there. It is already defined in that
router. Infact I just copied it from the working router.
Thanks,
Kiran
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote
th 2610, then it is working properly.
In L3 Switch I am having 8 VLANS on port base. And I am using static
routing in that.
Thanks for your detailed mail.
Kiran
> -Peter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2
; Hai,
>
> I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
> network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
> connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular
> VLAN,
> and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of th
uter conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want
to keep the default gw out it's serial interface.
>
> -Patrick
>
>
> >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 07/24/01 10:27AM >>>
> Hai,
>
> I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 261
; In addition, not only can you not do 100Mbps/full duplex on a 2610,
> > that ethernet interface cannot be a trunk port. Those do not
> support
> > ISL or 802.1q unless something has changed recently.
> >
> > If I'm wrong, someone please correct me.
> >
> >
> > >>> "Kiran Kumar M" 7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>>
> > Hai,
> >
> > I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
> > network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
> > connecting to the L3 sw
> Hai,
>
> I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
> network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I
am
> connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular
> VLAN,
> and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that V
mar M
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
Hai,
I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
connecting to the L3 switch,
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]
sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610.
The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is
plugged into has an ip addr
.1q unless something has changed recently.
If I'm wrong, someone please correct me.
Regards,
John
>>> "Kiran Kumar M" 7/24/01 8:27:12 AM >>>
Hai,
I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WI
ing a cisco 2610 router in my
network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN,
and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having
Hai,
I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN,
and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
another
otts wrote:
> The PA-2FE is supported in Cisco IOS Releases 12.1(5)E, 12.0(15)S, 12.1(6),
> 12.2(1), 12.2(2)T and after.
> HTH
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 8:57 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The PA-2FE is supported in Cisco IOS Releases 12.1(5)E, 12.0(15)S, 12.1(6),
12.2(1), 12.2(2)T and after.
HTH
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 8:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FastEthernet Adapter for
ancient hardware rev??
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Robert Fowler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been beating my head on the side of this router. I've searched the CCO
> on how to enable the PA-2FE adapter, and found some information on
> microcode.
David,
My sincerest apologies for ever doubting you. 12.1(6) works great!
Thanks,
Robert
-Original Message-
From: David C Prall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FastEthernet Adapter for 7206 - How do I enable? [7:6411
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FastEthernet Adapter for 7206 - How do I enable? [7:6411]
Checkout the HW-SW Compatibility Table
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/Support/HWSWmatrix/hwswmatrix.cgi
The PA-2FE-TX requires a minimum of 12.1(6) for Mainline.
David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECT
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:36 AM
Subject: FastEthernet Adapter for 7206 - How do I enable? [7:6411]
> Hello,
>
> I've been beating my head on the side of this router. I've searched the
CCO
> on how to enable the PA-2FE adapter, and found some information on
> micro
Hello,
I've been beating my head on the side of this router. I've searched the CCO
on how to enable the PA-2FE adapter, and found some information on
microcode. Then I found out the IOS I've upgraded to (12.1.(3)) already has
a current version built in. I don't recall learning anything about Micr
unsubscribe
Quinton Clark
Internet Systems Engineer
Exodus Internet
Tel : 0808 100 3963
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol
; > > >
> > > > How about RJ45?
> > > >
> > > > How about MII?
> > > >
> > > > GMII?
> > > >
> > > > Others?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Priscilla
> > > >
>
Original Message-
>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Thursday, April 26, 2001 6:27 PM
>Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
>
>
> >I'm looking for a real answer from experience, not documentation. That
page
> >y
> > >
> > > Priscilla
> > >
> > > > > Priscilla
> > > > >
> > > > > At 08:21 PM 4/25/01, md. nazri wrote:
> > > > > >thanks for the answer...
> > > > > >i understand that LP will
A on 27/04/2001
04:12 pm ---
"Priscilla Oppenheimer" @groupstudy.com on 27/04/2001
11:18:45 am
Please respond to "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down
nt-to-point FE full-duplex link get
> > > dedicated 100 Mbps bandwidth for transmitting. One station's transmit
> > > medium is the other's receive medium. Some people call this 200 Mbps.
In
> > > actuality most traffic types don't take advantage of this.
> > >
> >
why FE
>still
> > >up,
> > > > >does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to
> > > > >Ethernet..?
> > > > >- Original Message -
> > > > >From: "Vincent Chong"
> > > > >To:
&
gt;Ethernet..?
> > > >- Original Message -
> > > >From: "Vincent Chong"
> > > >To:
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM
> > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
> > >
100 Mbps bandwidth for transmitting. One station's transmit
> > medium is the other's receive medium. Some people call this 200 Mbps. In
> > actuality most traffic types don't take advantage of this.
> >
> > >- Original Message -
> > >From
down? Does it apply the same to
> > > >Ethernet..?
> > > >- Original Message -
> > > >From: "Vincent Chong"
> > > >To:
> > > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM
> > > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Li
ever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to
> > >Ethernet..?
> > >- Original Message -
> > >From: "Vincent Chong"
> > >To:
> > >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:48 PM
> > >Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol d
100 Mbps bandwidth for transmitting. One station's transmit
> medium is the other's receive medium. Some people call this 200 Mbps. In
> actuality most traffic types don't take advantage of this.
>
> >- Original Message -----
> >From: "Priscilla Oppenhe
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
>To:
>Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:07 AM
>Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
>
>
> > I don't think it's just Fast Ethernet. I've seen "Slow" Ethernet report
> > that the int
: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
> I don't think it's just Fast Ethernet. I've seen "Slow" Ethernet report
> that the interface is up, down when nothing was attached. It seems to just
> be an
;thanks for the answer...
>i understand that LP will down if no connection attach, but why FE still up,
>does it up forever until we shut it down? Does it apply the same to
>Ethernet..?
>- Original Message -
>From: "Vincent Chong"
>To:
>Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3
ubject: Re: FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down [7:1828]
> 1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running
> configuration. You have to
> shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down and line
> protocol down.
>
> 2)Line protocol will up if ther
1) I guess you enable the fastethernet port in the running
configuration. You have to
shutdown the port, so the port will administrative shut down and line
protocol down.
2)Line protocol will up if there is any phyiscal connection attached to
Fastethernet.
Becasue the port in
hi all,
got one question regarding FastEthernet on Cisco 2620..
why the status showed FastEthernet is up, Line protocol down although the
cable was pulled out from the port...in what cases the port will down..any
help appreciated
tq
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php
No the Catalysts, and routers only support "802.1q" on fastethernet ports.
Chad A. Simmons, MCSE, CCNP, CCDP
Network Consultant
Network Services Group
Court Square Data Group, Inc.
1391 Main St.
Springfield, Ma. 01103
(413) 746-0054 (Phone)
(413) 746-0058 (Fax)
[EMAIL PROTE
Hi All - Is it possible to run "routing on a stick" on an regular ethernet
interface, not fastethernet??? I loaded IOS version 12.1.7 onto the 2611
and I could create subinterface on its ethernet ports. I could also
encapsulate these subinterfaces to 802.1q and assign IP addresses fo
>>> "Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/14/01 6:42:19 PM >>>
>
>I'm looking for an example config of a 2924XL switch trunking to the
a
>fastethernet port on a 2621 and trunking to a 1912 using ISL. I've
searched
>CCO without luck. Please po
I'm looking for an example config of a 2924XL switch trunking to the a
fastethernet port on a 2621 and trunking to a 1912 using ISL. I've searched
CCO without luck. Please post anything relevent.
Thanks - Dave
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
t; -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 9:17 AM
> To: cisco
> Subject: FastEthernet
>
> Can't get to a router with a fe interface at the moment
>
> Can a FE use sub-interfaces?
>
> A problem w
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: FastEthernet
>Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:57:10 -0600 (CST)
>
>On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Kevin Wigle wrote:
>
> > Can't get to a router with a fe interface at the moment
>
>perhaps you can get to it from another interface, like a ser
-interfaces but would have to assume so
judging by what your seeing.
Cory
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 9:17 AM
To: cisco
Subject: FastEthernet
Can't get to a router with a fe interface at the moment
Can a FE us
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Kevin Wigle wrote:
> Can't get to a router with a fe interface at the moment
perhaps you can get to it from another interface, like a serial interface?
>
> Can a FE use sub-interfaces?
only if you are doing VLANS with ISL or dot1q.
>
> A problem we encountered i
Can't get to a router with a fe interface at the moment
Can a FE use sub-interfaces?
A problem we encountered is that we tried to bring up a new cct.
The FE already had on OSPF area on it - say area 2
We added a secondary address and put that network into area 3
All hell broke loose.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 100M FastEthernet
Could anyone tell me how to manually force 100M FastEthernet (not
10/100M) to work on 10M Ethernet connection?
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscondu
o.k. o.k. misread the question. You are right.
-Original Message-
From: A. Geoffrey Cauchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 October 2000 10:36
To: McCallum, Robert; 'Roland Mok'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 100M FastEthernet
100Mb Fast Ethernet will never work at
TED]>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 10:20 AM
Subject: RE: 100M FastEthernet
> int fast0/0
> speed 10
> duplex half
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roland Mok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 October 2000 02:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 100M FastEther
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
