On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:06, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> >
> >>Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt:
> >>
> >>>My current diff is at:
> >>>http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff
> >>>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:20:37AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Larry McVoy wrote:
> >Over time we have a plan to make this go away. The main reason that
> >there have been license issues is that we had a goal to give the latest
> >and greatest out for free, that's how we could help open source
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 18:27, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > --- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 18:43, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > > > I have something to add to this. Recently I tested gatos drivers going
> > > > from dri t
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:21:32PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Thomas Emmel wrote:
>
> >
> >I would do so if I could download the source.
> >CVS is currently unusable for normal users.
> >Error is:
> >
> >cvs [server aborted]: cannot make directory KSC5601: No space left on
> >device
> >
> >and
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:46, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Thomas Emmel wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote:
> >
> >>Thomas Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>and this message means that the CVS-server is full.
> >>>I think this was mentioned before two days ago.
> >>
I have offered to do this and the offer stands. However, if the reality
is that nobody will use it I'm not going to bother, doing pointless work
for free users is a bit past my threshold of pain. So does this mean there
is or there is not interest?
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:14:48PM -0700, Jon S
> I don't speak for anyone but myself.
>
> Which part of 'CVS isn't the problem' is so hard for you guys to
> understand?
Message received, I've unsubscribed from the list and won't bother you again.
If you change your mind and decide we can help, let us know, happy to do so.
If not, no worries,
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 05:27, Chris Ison wrote:
>
> DRI is still quite young and alot of people still have the "Screw you
> Billy Goat" attitude,
Like who?
> to them FREE means no cost of any kind,
I wonder how many times I'm gonna have to say I care about free speech,
not free beer.
> and th
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:40, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:21:04PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:11, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > > >
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 19:54, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> I also wish Michel D would give BK a try before dismissing it on religious
> grounds.
My motivations aren't religious, in fact they're very pragmatic, and
anyone who thinks he knows my motivations better than I do is sadly
mistaken.
--
Earthlin
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 19:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=5
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 19:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=5
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 19:18 ---
Re: Erland Cleveland
I'll
> On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 19:42, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > There are 31 people with write access to dri.sf.net. The simplest
> > solution would be for those 31 to switch to BitKeeper.
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 15:17, Alan Cox wrote:
> Providing they don't have an employer or themselves work on anyth
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is probably better asked on dri-devel (cc:ed).
>
> --- Cheshire Cat Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am investigating supporting DRI and OpenGL for the Silicon Motion
> > driver.
> > I'm new to both of tho
Keith Packard wrote:
Around 9 o'clock on Sep 3, Keith Whitwell wrote:
It seems like anon cvs is something that causes project-hosting sites some
discomfort... freedesktop.org doesn't have it in place right now, for instance.
Freedesktop doesn't have any "real" CVS running at the moment; we ne
This is probably better asked on dri-devel (cc:ed).
--- Cheshire Cat Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am investigating supporting DRI and OpenGL for the Silicon Motion
> driver.
> I'm new to both of those, so some of these may be newbie sounding
> questions.
>
> 1) I have the OpenGL code from
Chris Ison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DRI is still quite young and alot of people still have the "Screw you
> Billy Goat" attitude, [...]
Please remember that DRI is not Linux,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
Well, earlier today (after about 5 days of absolutely *no* luck with the
sourceforge CVS servers), I managed to pull the entire source tree for the
Syllable operating system.
When I tried to pull the DRI CVS, though, I kept hitting locked files...
I made three attempts, over the period of about f
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> Isn't there some sort of delay involved here? I remember seeing something
> about the kernel BK->CVS lagging by several days. If so moving to BK could
> make the problem worse...
The main delay we've seen is when the central BK places have gone down du
Am Mittwoch, 3. September 2003 20:35 schrieb Matt Sealey:
> --
> Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dieter Nützel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 03 September 2003 18:45
> > To: Matt Sealey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [OT] Sourcefo
>
> On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 11:15, Michel D=C3=A4nzer wrote:
> > I'm all for it, if there's a solution for anonymous CVS.
>
> If need be I think linux.org.uk can field a secondary rsync'd=20
> anonymous CVS. It might need the 80Gb disks to be upped to 160/240Gb
> but that needs to happen soon anywa
Am Donnerstag, 4. September 2003 05:27 schrieb Chris Ison:
> Over the years, the core linux team has changes from fanatical hobbyists
> to a coding production team with deadlines. A fair chunk of the team
> seem to be from redhat who has a finacial interest in linux.
Do not exaggerate.
ODSL, Europ
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:14:48PM -0700, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Larry has offered to import DRI CVS into BK and then setup a BK to CVS bridge
> at bkbits.net. This would mean that CVS is served from bkbits.net. He asks that
> everyone give it a try and not just ignore it if he is going to go through t
On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 20:02, Brian Paul wrote:
> With any luck, the CVS performance problems will soon be mitigated.
and the disk space
and the response time ?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thin
--- Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Primarily the difficulty of creating an automated two-way bridge between
> them.
> As I understood it, the BK->CVS gateway you've talked about is a one-way
> affair, right?
Larry has offered to import DRI CVS into BK and then setup a BK to CVS br
Ian Romanick wrote:
I know that a lot of people in the community are very interested in
seeing pbuffer support in DRI drivers. I've been quick to point out
that pbuffers require fbconfigs. I've also been working to figure out
how to enable fbconfig support in client-side drivers. For stand-al
Matt Sealey wrote:
What exactly is the problem with Sourceforge anonymous CVS
anyway? I heard that the problems were a temporary measure
before they got new hardware to reduce the strain, but I
never saw any updates or new news about it after that.
From the 8/29 SourceForge newsletter:
> [...]
I
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Chris Ison wrote:
>
> > The philosophy has _never_ been "screw you Billy Goat". That's Sun and
> > Oracle.
>
> lol, I expected this, I should of said the "older linux fanatics", as
> linux was "sold" to me as a way to screw bill gates, and was the feeling
> at the time of ma
What exactly is the problem with Sourceforge anonymous CVS
anyway? I heard that the problems were a temporary measure
before they got new hardware to reduce the strain, but I
never saw any updates or new news about it after that.
One thing I was thinking. Couldn't a developer with CVS SSH
acces
> The philosophy has _never_ been "screw you Billy Goat". That's Sun and
> Oracle.
>
lol, I expected this, I should of said the "older linux fanatics", as
linux was "sold" to me as a way to screw bill gates, and was the feeling
at the time of many of the users I associated with.
Yes, at the ti
--- Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can we please end this discussion about the BK license now? Or at least
> take it off list?
>
> As for BitKeeper vs CVS (for the DRI), this is what it breaks down to:
>
> 1) The BK license possibly forbids at least one DRI developer from using
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Chris Ison wrote:
>
> Because of this the core of the linux team appear to be more concerned
> about getting the job done due to the fact that some big money is
> supporting and using linux. Although linux is FREE, its pholisiphy has
> changed from one of "Screw you Billy Goat
Am Mittwoch, 3. September 2003 18:00 schrieb Matt Sealey:
> > > Nothing whatsoever. But IMHO there's something wrong with people who
> > > keep trying to shove non-free tools down everyone else's throats.
> >
> > The problem with that statement is that it implies that you speak for
> > everyone, in
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Since I rsync from a CVS checkout all the cvs commands still work but go
> back off to the CVS server saving a ton of bandwidth and cpu
This only works if the CVS server itself is working well _anyway_.
So yes, rsync in that sense can be used to (somewhat
Over the years, the core linux team has changes from fanatical hobbyists
to a coding production team with deadlines. A fair chunk of the team
seem to be from redhat who has a finacial interest in linux.
Because of this the core of the linux team appear to be more concerned
about getting the job do
Over the years, the core linux team has changes from fanatical hobbyists
to a coding production team with deadlines. A fair chunk of the team
seem to be from redhat who has a finacial interest in linux.
Because of this the core of the linux team appear to be more concerned
about getting the job do
Can we please end this discussion about the BK license now? Or at least
take it off list?
As for BitKeeper vs CVS (for the DRI), this is what it breaks down to:
1) The BK license possibly forbids at least one DRI developer from using
the free version of BK.
2) Other DRI developers have moral o
Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People claim that our license is a problem but the only real problem is
> the people making the noise. [...]
Things are getting ridiculous when you start to superimpose your attitude
towards ethics on others - especially when you are obviously lacking the
Ian Romanick wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Who is building the binary snapshots these days? We need to start
(and should have started a long time ago) including libGL.so in the
snapshots.
Hmm, we've tried to ensure up until now that the drivers would work
with existing li
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
> > If that's so, you are hurting the community
> > over a licensing issue which doesn't effect anyone who doesn't want to
> > be effected. Seems a tad extreme.
>
> Didn't licensing issues hurting the community enough in generall?
I'
Am Mittwoch, 3. September 2003 17:40 schrieb Larry McVoy:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:21:04PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:11, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Who is building the binary snapshots these days? We need to start
(and should have started a long time ago) including libGL.so in the
snapshots.
Hmm, we've tried to ensure up until now that the drivers would work with
existing libGL.so's. What has cha
Larry McVoy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 04:29:12PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
I'm not sure that anyone is asking you to use it. What's wrong with the
people who want to use BK use BK and the people who want to use CVS use
CVS?
Primarily the difficulty of creating an automated two-way bridg
> > Nothing whatsoever. But IMHO there's something wrong with people who
> > keep trying to shove non-free tools down everyone else's throats.
>
> The problem with that statement is that it implies that you speak for
> everyone, in particular the people who have commit rights in the CVS
> tree.
Ian Romanick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Hello. In the future, please try to include line-breaks in your
messages. It makes them *much* easier to read. Thanks. :)
I am running xfree86 4.3.0 with the ATI 128 drivers from 2nd Sept. I
am trying to run Medal of Honor Allied Assault
Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 19:42, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> > There are 31 people with write access to dri.sf.net. The simplest solution
>> > would be for those 31 to switch to BitKeeper.
> If thos 31 are OK
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 04:29:12PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >I'm not sure that anyone is asking you to use it. What's wrong with the
> >people who want to use BK use BK and the people who want to use CVS use
> >CVS?
>
> Primarily the difficulty of creating an automated two-way bridge betw
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:21:04PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:11, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > > -- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 19:42, Jon Smirl wrote:
>> > There are 31 people with write access to dri.sf.net. The simplest solution
>> > would be for those 31 to switch to BitKeeper.
> If thos 31 are O
Larry McVoy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
-- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS.
I know bk is the best version control system in th
Larry McVoy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
-- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS.
I know bk is the best version control system in th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Hello. In the future, please try to include line-breaks in your
messages. It makes them *much* easier to read. Thanks. :)
I am running xfree86 4.3.0 with the ATI 128 drivers from 2nd Sept. I am trying to run Medal of Honor Allied Assault with the Spearhead expa
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:11, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > -- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > -- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS.
>
> I know bk is the best version control system in the
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 19:42, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > There are 31 people with write access to dri.sf.net. The simplest solution
> > would be for those 31 to switch to BitKeeper.
If thos 31 are OK with that then it's easy, we can do a BK to
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 10:37 ---
Strange, I had deleted "exp
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 15:31, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> I can second that.
>
> Have you tried demos/stex3d e.g. move the window to the right side of your
> desktop?
>
Yes I have now and it looks really similar. The ring is broken on
several positions. But the object I see in my application is
alway
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 15:12, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> After looking at your png's, it's not so clear that we know the problem well
> enough for you to go ahead with this, so don't worry about it at this point.
>
> Can you give me backtraces from the NO_TCL crash?
>
Program received signal SIGFPE,
Am Mittwoch, 3. September 2003 15:11 schrieb Thomas Emmel:
> On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Hmm, after looking at your screenshots, this seems like a seperate,
> > unrelated problem.
> >
> > What happens if you set the following environment variables:
> >
> > R200_NO_VTX
> I did not meant to replace everything via rsync. I use it for
> several purposes, mostly backup and it is a great tool but not
> really able to handle a repository. The point is only the speed
Ditto. I use rsync for all the big pulls and sync ups. Since I rsync
from a CVS checkout all the cvs co
On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 11:15, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> I'm all for it, if there's a solution for anonymous CVS.
If need be I think linux.org.uk can field a secondary rsync'd
anonymous CVS. It might need the 80Gb disks to be upped to 160/240Gb
but that needs to happen soon anyway
-
On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 11:15, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> I'm all for it, if there's a solution for anonymous CVS.
If need be I think linux.org.uk can field a secondary rsync'd
anonymous CVS. It might need the 80Gb disks to be upped to 160/240Gb
but that needs to happen soon anyway
-
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:06:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Havoc Pennington wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:57:30PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> >>Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable,
> >>anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I
On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 19:42, Jon Smirl wrote:
> There are 31 people with write access to dri.sf.net. The simplest solution
> would be for those 31 to switch to BitKeeper.
Providing they don't have an employer or themselves work on anything
which forbids them using it (eg a version control system)
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:58, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> I'm not really familiar with who the anoncvs mirrors are, how they work, or
> why they're able to provide effective anon cvs when sourceforge can't...
I think the main problem with sf.net is that we have to share it with
tons of mostly unrel
Thomas Emmel wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Hmm, after looking at your screenshots, this seems like a seperate, unrelated
problem.
What happens if you set the following environment variables:
R200_NO_VTXFMT=t
R200_NO_TCL=t
Keith
R200_NO_VTXFMT=t does
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Hmm, after looking at your screenshots, this seems like a seperate, unrelated
> problem.
>
> What happens if you set the following environment variables:
>
> R200_NO_VTXFMT=t
> R200_NO_TCL=t
>
> Keith
R200_NO_VTXFMT=t does nothin
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:57:30PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable,
anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I wouldn't even
think about using non-anon pserver but I don't think DRI will eve
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:57:30PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Havoc, your comment on pserver being like telnet isn't really applicable,
> anon only pserver is as secure as any anon only service, I wouldn't even
> think about using non-anon pserver but I don't think DRI will ever need
> such a thi
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 08:06 ---
Did you run "make depend"?
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure freedesktop.org can host anoncvs, though it's possible we
could for DRI. I know GNOME, KDE, Mozilla, and other huge projects'
anoncvs would require more load than freedesktop.org server can
handle. DRI anoncvs traffic may be smaller.
However, we do plan to
> > > dri.freedesktop.org sound good?
> >
> > I love the idea of moving to freedesktop.org right now to deal with the
> > anonymous cvs issue, provide cvsup, and probably a more responsive set
> > of admins. Is there consensus on this?
>
> I'm all for it, if there's a solution for anonymous CVS.
Thomas Emmel wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:12, Thomas Emmel wrote:
Back to my problem...
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:24, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Is it correct that your application is using 1-dimensional textures and vertex
arrays? This is a little-exercised aspect of the driver, but it shouldn't
Thomas Emmel wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:12, Thomas Emmel wrote:
Back to my problem...
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:24, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Is it correct that your application is using 1-dimensional textures and vertex
arrays? This is a little-exercised aspect of the driver, but it shouldn't
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
>> I'm running a quite up-to-date mirror in Germany - currently without public
>> access, but we could change this. Though this mirror suffers from absence of
>> the SF server too
> What sort of a mirror, Martin?
I did a daily
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
> -- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS.
I know bk is the best version control system in the universe
feature-wise, no need to say it again. And again. And again. (And
Hi,
I'm not sure freedesktop.org can host anoncvs, though it's possible we
could for DRI. I know GNOME, KDE, Mozilla, and other huge projects'
anoncvs would require more load than freedesktop.org server can
handle. DRI anoncvs traffic may be smaller.
However, we do plan to have anoncvs mirrors o
Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
> Module name: xc
> Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/glx/
> Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/09/02 14:47:24
> Log message:
> Fixed a typo that caused problems linking (but not running)
> applications.
Thanks a lot - I was
Martin Spott wrote:
Thomas Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and this message means that the CVS-server is full.
I think this was mentioned before two days ago.
Some days before I had the problem that the download hangs in
xc/xc/util/patch infinitely. Now I tried to download completely
from scrat
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 00:53, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 16:42, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >
> > dri.freedesktop.org sound good?
>
> I love the idea of moving to freedesktop.org right now to deal with the
> anonymous cvs issue, provide cvsup, and probably a more responsive set
> of ad
Hello
I'm not sure that you will be too interested in this problem, but here goes...
I am running xfree86 4.3.0 with the ATI 128 drivers from 2nd Sept. I am trying to run
Medal of Honor Allied Assault with the Spearhead expansion pack under the August wine
drop. If I disable hardware opengl t
Back to my problem...
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:24, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Is it correct that your application is using 1-dimensional textures and vertex
> arrays? This is a little-exercised aspect of the driver, but it shouldn't too
> hard to fix up. I'll try and rig up something here that ex
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Thomas Emmel wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for your help. I have already loaded it via rsync from
> jose's mirror. Approx. 10 times faster than CVS...
rsync from jose has made it at least _possible_ to follow DRI development.
However... It's really a sucky thing to use. It means t
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 10:46, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your help. I have already loaded it via rsync from
> > jose's mirror. Approx. 10 times faster than CVS...
> >
>
> It seems like anon cvs is something that causes project-hosting sites some
> discomfort... freedesktop.o
Thomas Emmel wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote:
Thomas Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and this message means that the CVS-server is full.
I think this was mentioned before two days ago.
Some days before I had the problem that the download hangs in
xc/xc/util/patch infinit
Larry McVoy wrote:
From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge CVS, was Re: [Dri-devel] radeon error
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Jon Smirl wrote:
Having used CVS and BitKeeper, BitKeeper is way better.
I will just add a big "Amen, Brother!" to that.
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote:
> Thomas Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > and this message means that the CVS-server is full.
> > I think this was mentioned before two days ago.
> > Some days before I had the problem that the download hangs in
> > xc/xc/util/patch infinitel
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 03:23 ---
Hey Everyone,
I have tried
90 matches
Mail list logo
