For some reason I feel like laughing this morning, and you are adding
fuel to the fire. Thanks. (-:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@...
wrote:
>
> The Stooges!! I tracked down and bought, both The Three Stooges Meet
Hercules, and The Three Stooges In Outer Space - just to c
The Stooges!! I tracked down and bought, both The Three Stooges Meet Hercules,
and The Three Stooges In Outer Space - just to cover the entire spectrum of
human existence.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
>
>
> Took you longer than I expected, but not bad. BTW, I do
Took you longer than I expected, but not bad. BTW, I do have picture of
me with the Three Stooges when I was 5 or 6, when they were at the St.
Louis Arena. One with the Lone Ranger too, I believe.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogrou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote:
> > > >
>
__
> > From: seventhray27 steve.sundur@...
> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> >Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 10:01 PM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second
Attention, Pros and Cons]
> >
> >
>
find Ann on the dance floor and ask her to take you for a
spin. Â Â
>
>
>
> >
> > From: seventhray27 steve.sundur@...
> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> >Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 8:11 PM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
> > (snip)
> > > > I like Ste
ct: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
>Pros and Cons]
>
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.su
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 8:11 PM
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
>Pros and Cons]
>
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
> > (snip)
> > > > I like Ste
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok no_reply@ wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
> (snip)
> > > I like Steve, and have always liked him. He is generous
> > > and one of the more humble of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
(snip)
> > I like Steve, and have always liked him. He is generous
> > and one of the more humble of the contributors here.
>
>
> I have to join the chorus here, even if belated. Steve
> about what Ravi wrote is abusive, given that this is FFL, and not
> an
> > > > > episode of Barney and Friends. Â His use of the word
> "fucking?" Â
>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Okay, I'll settle for mean spirit
the way I
> > > > perceived his comments below, and I replied in a strong fashion,
> > drawing a
> > > > comparison I should not have made. But you are right. It is often not a
> > > > friendly place here, and Ravi dishes his strong opinons that I often
e. But you are right. It is often not a
> > > friendly place here, and Ravi dishes his strong opinons that I often
> > > perceive to be quite biased. Others see it differently. But when I see
> what
> > > I perceive to be "bullying", perhaps the broades
Thanks Shokacharya. The good feeling is mutual. I always enjoy your
contributions here. We don't really get those first accounts about
India and elsewhere from anyone else.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" awoelflebater@
ius
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:03 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
> Pros and Cons]
>
>
> Â
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
> >
> > That&#
h other.ÃÂ
> > > > >
> > > > > Each to our own opinion on Ravi's post. I found it rather humorous
> > > > > because it was typical of his style and the playfulness in it felt
> > > > > less than 'over the top' to me. But I have found that you do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
> >
> > Steve has also recently been a generous supporter of yours. Of course in
> > that case there was no mention of knights on white horses, lack of
> > intelligence, etc.
gt; > than 'over the top' to me. But I have found that you don't have the
> > > > most active sense of humour, especially when something is directed at
> > > > you. You like to 'play' but only when it deflects or is a way for you
> > >
atured.
> >
> > Thank you for those kind words.
> >
> > > I am not sure what you mean by your second sentence.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
the word, I will
> > address it in what I feel to be an appropiate way.
> >
> > > > From: seventhray27
> > > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:03 PM
> > > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [wa
on to be fair and he
> > comes across as good natured.
>
> Thank you for those kind words.
>
> > I am not sure what you mean by your second sentence.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________
> > >
ence.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Ann
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:02 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attent
revert to the main topic if you are interested - in this case your
> mention of astral, celestial planes - which I referred to as platitudes and
> delusional beliefs and inauthentic response to my challenge.
>
>
> >
> > ----------
> > *From:* Rav
d smiley
> smile (-:
>
>
> ------------------
> *From:* Ravi Chivukula
> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:16 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second
> Attention, Pros and Cons]
gt; > From: seventhray27
> > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > >Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:03 PM
> > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second
> Attention, Pros and Cons]
> > >
> > >
> > >Â
> > >
ius
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:03 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
> Pros and Cons]
>
>
> Â
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
> >
> > That's
EGYRUTOLTSGFPLYF
XT, I just popped into BC (-:
sfl
From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:03 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, Pros
and Cons
r. Taxi?
>
lifE beinG totalitY, whateveR yoU wanT tO calL iT iS keepinG itselF uP alL bY
itselF.
>
>
> From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:12 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstr
rfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:12 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, Pros
and Cons]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaner
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
>
> > Now, in the language of the TMO, TM is alleged to bring the experience of
> > 'invincibility'. That is, the absence of vulnerability. It does see
tordumbass@..."
> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:55 AM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
> >Pros and Cons]
> >
> >
> >Â
> >
> >
> >--- In FairfieldL
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> I'd suggest that there may be a kind of core
> invulnerability that comes from spiritual development,
> but that when it's authentic, its effect is to make it
> possible to be *more* vulnerable in one's interpersonal
> interactions. One
Sounds like you've surrendered to God :) Gotta go, have a good day.
>
> From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:55 AM
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
> Now, in the language of the TMO, TM is alleged to bring the experience of
> 'invincibility'. That is, the absence of vulnerability. It does seem that
> people who have had long practice with at least some spiritual tec
Judy, I like this a lot, thank you.
>
> From: authfriend
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:07 AM
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
>Pros and Cons
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
> > >
> > > Share doesn't know how to dance or play *with* people,
> > > because that would requ
FWIW, Xeno, in two posts today, we have examples of
what I would characterize as faux vulnerability--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/335956
--and faux invulnerability:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/335974
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
> >
> > Share doesn't know how to dance or play *with* people,
> > because that would require a vulnerability not present
> > in her.
>
> Now, in the language of th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
>
> Share doesn't know how to dance or play *with* people, because that would
> require a vulnerability not present in her. Â
>
Now, in the language of the TMO, TM is alleged to bring the experience of
'invincibility'. That is, the absen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
> >
> > Steve has also recently been a generous supporter of yours. Of course in
> > that case there was no mention of knights on white horses, lack of
> > intelligence, etc.
>
> I
authfriend
> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:37 AM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
> >Pros and Cons]
> >
> >
> >Â
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Shar
nice for you. He is very staunch.
> >
> >
> > Judy to Ravi in Mission
> > Accomplished thread:
> >
> > Good enough, Ravi, thanks. We should all be able to
> > speak frankly to those we care about.
> >
> >
> > ___
eve so that is nice for you. He is very staunch.
> >
> >
> > Judy to Ravi in Mission
> > Accomplished thread:
> >
> > Good enough, Ravi, thanks. We should all be able to
> > speak frankly to those we care about.
> >
> >
> > ___
Dear Share, you forgot the H. Love and light, Emily
>
> From: authfriend
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:37 AM
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
et's just say there is no consensus here on either count.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Ann
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:02 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second
you think is better my beloved Auntie Share?
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Share Long wrote:
> >
> >
> > >ÃÂ
> > >I shall go forth dearest Ravi but only if we can go hand in hand smiley
> > >smile (-:
> > >
> > >
>>
>> Judy to Ravi in Mission
>> Accomplished thread:
>>
>> Good enough, Ravi, thanks. We should all be able to
>> speak frankly to those we care about.
>>
>>
>> ____________
>> From: Ravi Chivukula
>> To: Fairfiel
Yes, Ravi and I spoke frankly to each other. Ravi spoke
frankly to you. But you have not responded in kind.
>
> Judy to Ravi in Mission
> Accomplished thread:
>
> Good enough, Ravi, thanks. We should all be able to
> speak frankly to those we care about.
>
> From: Ravi Ch
.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:02 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, Pros
and Cons]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
>
> So Judy, any criticisms for Ravi's over the top post below? Right. I
: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, Pros
and Cons]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
>
> So Judy, any criticisms for Ravi's over the top post below? Right. I
> thought not. Even though it was obviously way over the to
, why don't you choose
which one you think is better.
From: Ravi Chivukula
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
Pros and Cons]
e we care about.
>
>
>
> From: Ravi Chivukula
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second
> Attention, Pros and Cons]
>
>
> Â
>
ay.
> > From: seventhray27
> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> >Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:03 PM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
> >Pros and Cons]
> >
> >
> >Â
> >
> >
> &
_
From: Ravi Chivukula
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
Pros and Cons]
Not clear enough, hmm.. - OK - I'm working on a sign for my door
1) Leave your fucki
ho they're ganging up against. Just MHO (-:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: seventhray27
> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > > > > Oh dear Share - with the above statement the automated
> platitude
> > > detector
> > > > > > > of FFL has recorded this as your 1 millionth platitude on FFL.
> You
> > > are
> > > > > > > hereby declared to be the ava
d "fucking?"
>
> From: seventhray27
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:03 PM
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
>Pros and Cons]
>
>
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLif
> 1) Leave your fucking platitudes at the doorstep
> > > > > 2) Leave your inauthentic bullshit at the doorstep
> > > > > 3) Leave your delusional fantasies at the doorstep
> > > > >
> > > > > Which one do you think is better my beloved Auntie Share?
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
snip
> Oh, you were unable to recognize what I wrote above as my
> refusal to get into an argument with you?
I wish you a good nights sleep!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
> > >
> snip
> > > And maybe one day, perhaps in the afterlife, I will understand
> > > how you were able
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
snip
> It's not as if we needed additional evidence of your lack
> of intelligent brain cells, but what the heck, if you're
> bent on providing it, nobody's going to stop you.
>
I am going to spare myself the waste of time and you, the un
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm sorry Judy, I don't see it. I see Share making a broad
> > > statement about tre
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
> > > > > 1) Leave your fucking platitudes at the doorstep
> > > > > 2) Leave your inauthentic bullshit at the doorstep
> > > > > 3) Leave your delusional fantasies at the doorstep
> > > > >
> > > > > Which one do you think is better m
gt; >
> > > > > Thanks Steve, I appreciate the support by an individual. OTOH I
> > > > > really don't want rallying around by any group, men or women,
> > > > > especially if it means ganging up on someone. I find that cowardly
> > > > > and despicable no matter
uantum light weavers - your weaknesses have
> been
> > > > > reduced to naught in one fell swoop, you have been totally healed
> - no
> > > > > longer you are one of the billions with positives and negatives.
> Go forth
> > > > > and start your own cult O' Wise lady.
> > > > >
> > > >
gt; > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not clear enough, hmm.. - OK - I'm working on a sign for my door
> > > > > > >
> &g
gt;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________
> > > From: seventhray27
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:35 PM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was
> >
> >
> >
> > From: seventhray27
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:35 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
> > Pros an
lusional fantasies at the doorstep
> > > > >
> > > > > Which one do you think is better my beloved Auntie Share?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Share Long wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > &
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:35 PM
> *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second
> Attention, Pros and Cons]
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
> >
> > You have always needed some intelligent brain cells
> From: seventhray27
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:35 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
> Pros and Cons]
>
>
> Â
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rav
Just MHO (-:
From: seventhray27
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:35 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, Pros
and Cons]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
>
> You have al
e?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Share Long wrote:
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I shall go forth dearest Ravi but only if we can go hand in hand smiley
> > > > smile (-:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -
ction of
> > > consciousness. Want to add that 2 spiritual teachers I respect a lot say
> > > that there is a definite distinction between the celestial and astral
> > > realms. The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to them.
> > >
> > >
&
> >
> > I shall go forth dearest Ravi but only if we can go hand in hand smiley
> > smile (-:
> >
> >
> > --
> > *From:* Ravi Chivukula
> > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 20
19, 2013 12:00 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, Pros
and Cons]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> Hmmm, no, they are mistaken. Sorry. :-) In my experience, they are both
> accessed the same way, and are occ
uary 19, 2013 10:16 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second
> Attention, Pros and Cons]
>
>
> "The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to them."
>
> Oh dear Share - with the above statement the automated platitude detector
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> Hmmm, no, they are mistaken. Sorry. :-) In my experience, they are both
> accessed the same way, and are occurring in the same frequency range.
>
> Because of the distinguishing characteristics of the Celestial worlds, I
> pers
m: "doctordumbass@..."
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention,
> Pros and Cons]
>
>
> Â
> Think of it this way - the astral world, meaning a
realm is NOT the upper astral according to them.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re:
T the upper astral according to them.
>
>
> --
> *From:* "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
> *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM
> *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second
> A
.
From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, Pros
and Cons]
Think of it this way - the astral world, meaning
Think of it this way - the astral world, meaning all of it, parallels our
consciousness, like two thermometers, side by side, each reading the same
thing. Astral is a higher vibration than physical. The sight one gets from
practicing Patanjali's sutra, or by some other means like peyote (ick) or
Freebie from Doc:
This word "astral" that you and Fred use, could be called "ass-tral" - lol,
because those that focus on the astral world, vs. Celestial, have a low
consciousness.
Its like breaking into someone's basement, and really should be avoided for all
the trouble it causes. The horr
87 matches
Mail list logo
