Is there anyone running z/VM 5.3 on a z/10 box, Yes I know 5.3 is
unsupported...
We currently have one lpar still running z/VM 5.3 on a z10-EC. It will be
upgraded to z/VM 5.4 this weekend. The 5.3 system is at RSU 1001.
Paul Feller
AIT Mainframe Technical Support
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of clifford jackson
Sent
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Les Geer (607-429-3580)
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 4:58 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Crypro Express on z/VM 5.3
Our TPF developers have developed a sudden urge
are specific
in stating that Crypto Express 2 is only supported by zLinux and z/OS guests.
Is there anything that would preclude its being used by zTPF guests?
We are currently running z/VM 5.3 on a z9. In early Jan, we will be on a shiny
new z10 but will still be running 5.3 for whatever time
are specific in stating that Crypto Express 2 is only supported by zLinux
and z/OS guests. Is there anything that would preclude its being used
by zTPF guests?
We are currently running z/VM 5.3 on a z9. In early Jan, we will be on
a shiny new z10 but will still be running 5.3 for whatever time
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Sorry. I thought I knew what you meant. :-) A program interrupt loop is
detected when there is a program check and the current PSW is the same
as the Program New PSW. This indicates that there is something wrong
On Tuesday, 11/17/2009 at 03:45 EST, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I stand corrected. CP is not able to detect a program check in the
handler other than an invalid new PSW. If it's not wiped out, the my
bet would be on a BC-mode PSW. If CP D PSW ALL does not show you, a
TRACE PROG
Hello all,
am trying to run (believe it or not) an OS/390 2.4 guest under z/VM 5.3
(0703) on a CP (z990).
The usual CP Directory statements are in place, memory is 1G.
I am getting as far as the first reply request, see below:
===
IEA371I SYS1.PARMLIB ON DEVICE 0847 SELECTED FOR IPL PARAMETERS
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:47 PM, J. Cassidy s...@jdcassidy.net wrote:
As soon as I reply with r 00,sysp=00,clpa everything dies with a
HCPGIR453W CP entered; program interrupt loop message.
That means it gets a program check in the program check handler.
You should probably look at the PGMOLD
On Monday, 11/16/2009 at 08:17 EST, J. Cassidy s...@jdcassidy.net
wrote:
am trying to run (believe it or not) an OS/390 2.4 guest under z/VM 5.3
(0703) on a CP (z990).
...
As soon as I reply with r 00,sysp=00,clpa everything dies with a
HCPGIR453W CP entered; program interrupt loop message
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
As soon as I reply with r 00,sysp=00,clpa everything dies with a
HCPGIR453W CP entered; program interrupt loop message.
As Rob says, HCP453W indicates that the PROGRAM NEW PSW was corrupted or
otherwise not valid
On Monday, 11/16/2009 at 02:53 EST, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com
wrote:
You're putting different traces in my mouth. It does not have to be a
bogus PGM New PSW. It can also be something happening in the program
check handler. A popular trick is when the old PSW is massaged in some
way
and Service
2009/8/24 Victor Hugo Ochoa vhoa...@gmail.com
I have a question….
What is the procedure to follow for update environments z/vm 5.3 to 5.4.
Exists some manual or some RSU for this purpose?
Thanks to all
ATTE
Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila
--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer
I have a question
.
What is the procedure to follow for update environments z/vm 5.3 to 5.4.
Exists some manual or some RSU for this purpose?
Thanks to all
ATTE
Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila
manual should help you. It can be found here
http://www.vm.ibm.com/progdir/ z/VM V5.4 Guide for Automated
Installation and Service
2009/8/24 Victor Hugo Ochoa vhoa...@gmail.com
I have a question….
What is the procedure to follow for update environments z/vm 5.3 to 5.4.
Exists some manual
: Problems with IPLing a SECOND LEVEL z/VM 5.3
Not really, CP no longer supports a 3125 as console. Removed several
years ago.
What was seen was the first level VM that simulates the linemode
message interface of the HMC. The second level VM systems must have
had SYSTEM_CONSOLE in its console list
Hi
I am taking my first crack at building a 2nd level z/VM under my 1st
level z/VM. I tried IPLing the 2nd level and I am receiving the
following:
13:20:27 Start ((Warm|Force|COLD|CLEAN) (DRain) (DIsable) (NODIRect)
13:20:27 (NOAUTOlog)) or (SHUTDOWN)
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Problems with IPLing a SECOND LEVEL z/VM 5.3
Hi
I am taking my first crack at building a 2nd level z/VM under my 1st level
z/VM. I tried IPLing the 2nd level and I am receiving the following:
13:20:27 Start ((Warm|Force|COLD|CLEAN) (DRain) (DIsable) (NODIRect)
13:20:27
, 2009 12:38 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Problems with IPLing a SECOND LEVEL z/VM 5.3
Hi
I am taking my first crack at building a 2nd level z/VM under my 1st
level z/VM. I tried IPLing the 2nd level and I am receiving the
following:
13:20:27 Start ((Warm|Force|COLD|CLEAN
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Problems with IPLing a SECOND LEVEL z/VM 5.3
Hi
I am taking my first crack at building a 2nd level z/VM under my 1st
level z/VM. I tried IPLing the 2nd level and I am receiving the
following:
13:20:27 Start ((Warm|Force|COLD|CLEAN) (DRain) (DIsable) (NODIRect)
13:20
Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Bob Bates
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:45 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems with IPLing a SECOND LEVEL z/VM 5.3
Remember to do TERM CONMODE 3270 before the IPL?
Also, you may need
Title: Message
still pretty sweet that after all these years (decades!) CP will still initialize to a 3215! Albeit a virtual one.David
Original Message
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Problems with IPLing a SECOND LEVEL z/VM 5.3
From: Michael Coffin michaelcof...@mccci.com
Date: Thu
Message
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Problems with IPLing a SECOND LEVEL z/VM 5.3
From: Michael Coffin michaelcof...@mccci.com
Date: Thu, April 09, 2009 1:51 pm
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Yup, that's definitely it. Do:
CP TERM CONMODE 3270
IPL 1000 CLEAR LOADPARM 009
that will bring up
Did it ever? :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
Not really, CP no longer supports a 3125 as console.
Yes, surely in VM/SP (and IIRC even in VM/XA), CP supported a virtual
3215 as console. I don't remember when the support (and the
corresponding code) was removed.
2009/4/9 Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com:
Did it ever? :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
Not really, CP no longer supports a 3125 as
: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:41 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems with IPLing a SECOND LEVEL z/VM 5.3
Yes, surely in VM/SP (and IIRC even in VM/XA), CP supported a virtual
3215
-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:41 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems with IPLing a SECOND LEVEL z/VM 5.3
Yes, surely in VM/SP (and IIRC even in VM/XA), CP supported a virtual
3215
The year 1978 was the year after I left TWA to work for Amdahl. The
airline still had the 3215s in 1978. If you had gone to work for TWA,
you would have seen a 3215. Be glad that you didn't.
3125 is a typo, sorry.
That's the reason for the smiley. It was a typo that actually translated
to a
Is not Amdahl spelled in all lower case?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 2:49 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems with IPLing a SECOND LEVEL z/VM 5.3
, April 09, 2009 2:52 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems with IPLing a SECOND LEVEL z/VM 5.3
Is not Amdahl spelled in all lower case?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Thursday
On: Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 01:53:57PM -0700,Schuh, Richard Wrote:
} I remember the 3215. The first VM system I ever had did not have any
} terminals on it except for 3215s. Editing a sysgen was a royal pain.
When I started at huge insurance in NYC, we had mostly 2741 and some
TTYs on a 360/67
On Thursday, 03/26/2009 at 04:47 EDT, Daniel Allen dal...@serena.com
wrote:
If I put on RSU0901, does it contain UM32414 ?
You can find the content of any RSU at http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/rsu/
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
If I put on RSU0901, does it contain UM32414 ?
TIA
: z/VM 5.3 maintenance question
If I put on RSU0901, does it contain UM32414 ?
TIA
console.
The problem is that PCOMM software that establishes a console session with
each IPLed image isn't working, after the relocation of this console for
each session I TRY TO ESTABLISH I get LIGHTENING bolt 658.
The HMC is connected to a z/Series model 2086 machine running z/VM 5.3 801
LIGHTENING bolt 658.
The HMC is connected to a z/Series model 2086 machine running z/VM 5.3 801
Any help would be appreciated…..
_
Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows Live
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT
Hi Folks - Having laid off VM for 18 years, I would put myself back into the
ranks of a newbie. So, please bear with me.
Am trying to load z/VM 5.3 - loading from DVD pointing to g:/530vm.ins.
After a status=SUCCESS is achieved, the Integrated 3270 Console remains
blank with
a green cursor
--
Received: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:16:34 AM BST
From: Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: PWD z/vm 5.3 dev adrs
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Ian S. Worthington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Chris.
What's the best way of looking at the SYSTEM CONFIG? I can
are different.
On 7/26/08 6:16 PM, Ian S. Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm upgrading a system to the PWD z/vm 5.3 level.
I've downloaded and prepared the dasd but there isn't a .cfg file or anything
else to tell me at which addresses to mount the volumes (res, pag, spl, w01,
w02
Thanks Robert.
What about 3270 (etc) addresses? Do they matter?
i
-- Original Message --
Received: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:50:36 PM BST
From: RPN01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: PWD z/vm 5.3 dev adrs
Physical addresses don't matter. You IPL from your RES
/28 Ian S. Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Robert.
What about 3270 (etc) addresses? Do they matter?
i
-- Original Message --
Received: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:50:36 PM BST
From: RPN01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: PWD z/vm 5.3 dev adrs
Physical
--
Received: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:08:17 PM BST
From: Kris Buelens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: PWD z/vm 5.3 dev adrs
3270 addresses can matter:
- you can use them as IPL console: the rdev address is in SYSTEM CONFIG
- they can be enabled for use by VM: CP ENABLE
: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:08:17 PM BST
From: Kris Buelens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: PWD z/vm 5.3 dev adrs
3270 addresses can matter:
- you can use them as IPL console: the rdev address is in SYSTEM CONFIG
- they can be enabled for use by VM: CP ENABLE rdev
- some
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Ian S. Worthington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Chris.
What's the best way of looking at the SYSTEM CONFIG? I can attach it to a
running system but I don't know how to go about finding its minidisks and then
finding which has SYSTEM CONFIG.
If you already
I'm upgrading a system to the PWD z/vm 5.3 level.
I've downloaded and prepared the dasd but there isn't a .cfg file or anything
else to tell me at which addresses to mount the volumes (res, pag, spl, w01,
w02).
Anyone happen to know?
Or (better) should we have received a pointer to some
Actually you can remove the media whenever you want since it loads the
entire ramdisk into memory at IPL time. You just have to stick it back in
there when you want to save your customizations or IPL again.
--
Jay Brenneman
Someone mentioned the DVD drive being tied up during the
entire VM session. This made me think of something.
I have heard that the newer HMCs run Linux (is this true?).
If so, couldn't you make an image copy of the DVD on the hard
drive, and then mount that image rather than using the physical
On Tuesday, 07/22/2008 at 12:31 EDT, Shimon Lebowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Someone mentioned the DVD drive being tied up during the
entire VM session. This made me think of something.
I have heard that the newer HMCs run Linux (is this true?).
If so, couldn't you make an image copy of
Never get that far.
Get to my profile. Change a line or two. Continue. End up back at
the I need more stuff from your profile page page.hmm
Here's the part you don't want to hear: it works OK in Firefox, but
Safari gives me the above.
Also: do you really mean to restrict it to z10 EC
One can now order an 'evaluation version' of z/VM 5.3 from IBM at no charge. From the web
page:
The z/VM V5.3 Evaluation Edition is a no-charge trial version of z/VM 5.3 that is
intended to provide all IBM System z10 customers with the opportunity to evaluate z/VM. It
can be used to allow new z
Dave Jones wrote:
One can now order an 'evaluation version' of z/VM 5.3 from IBM at no charge.
Does it expire? :-)
...phsiii
On Jul 18, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Phil Smith III wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
One can now order an 'evaluation version' of z/VM 5.3 from IBM at
no charge.
Does it expire? :-)
I can't seem to (of course, I already HAVE z/VM 5.3, but you know,
this seemed interesting).
I log in, and it tells me
It is just angry at you ;-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Thornton
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 8:26 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: evaluation version of z/VM 5.3
On Jul
Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Thornton
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 8:26 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: evaluation version of z/VM 5.3
On Jul 18, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Phil Smith III wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
One can now order an 'evaluation
One can now order an 'evaluation version' of z/VM 5.3 from IBM at
no charge.
Does it expire? :-)
I can't seem to (of course, I already HAVE z/VM 5.3, but you know,
this seemed interesting).
I log in, and it tells me I need to answer more things in my profile,
but then everything marked
On Jul 18, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
It says it won't stop working, but the license agreement is for 90
days. It also says
it's only for z10.
Maybe it knows I don't have a z10, then.
Adam
On Jul 18, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Les Geer (607-429-3580) wrote:
One can now order an 'evaluation version' of z/VM 5.3 from IBM at
no charge.
Does it expire? :-)
I can't seem to (of course, I already HAVE z/VM 5.3, but you know,
this seemed interesting).
I log in, and it tells me I need
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:14 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam Thornton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
Also: do you really mean to restrict it to z10 EC customers only? Why
no love for BC, or indeed other z processors?
Well, there is no such thing as a z10 BC (yet). As far as other
requirements when running under z/VM
5.3 and Red Hat
Linux 4.6 and above? Thanks in advance.
David Juárez
CDC eServer Systems Support (310B)
IT Specialist - Systems Programmer
512-326-6116 Work
to be the general pattern.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Juarez, David T.
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:28 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Oracle 10g mini disk set up on z/VM 5.3 with Red Hat Linux 4.6 and
above
Subject
Re: z/VM 5.3 and PAV
Are you concerned you'll need PAV as you consolidate current
volumes? or as you grow current workloads? If the former, I'd
suggest looking at some statistics like I/O rate per GB of
disk storage. For example if you are doing 15 I/Os a second on
a 2.7GB disk, that's 5.6 I
time our storage group got a new disk array (IBM or
Hitachi, whatever), they would hard-code PAV alias addresses into the
DASD subsystem ... because z/OS needed that. When this was done, z/VM
5.3 could see and use the PAV alias(es) (for non-z/OS volumes too).
The only hard-coded PAV-aliases I'm
We are currently running a single z/VM 5.3 (701) system on Hitachi 7700E
disk, set up as 3390-3, connected to a z9BC via ESCON. This has worked
well, but the limited disk storage has kept us from growing past the 15 RH
Linux guests. We are in the process of installing a new Hitachi USP V
On Thursday, 07/03/2008 at 09:39 EDT, Dave Yarris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are currently running a single z/VM 5.3 (701) system on Hitachi 7700E
disk,
set up as 3390-3, connected to a z9BC via ESCON. This has worked well,
but the
limited disk storage has kept us from growing past
-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 09:49 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 and PAV
On Thursday, 07/03/2008 at 09:39 EDT, Dave Yarris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are currently running
Yarris
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 6:39 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] z/VM 5.3 and PAV
We are currently running a single z/VM 5.3 (701) system on Hitachi 7700E
disk, set up as 3390-3, connected to a z9BC via ESCON. This has worked
well, but the limited disk storage has kept us
The z/VM 5.3 announcement letter states that it includes HyperPAV
support for IBM System Storage DS8000. So - if you have a DS8000,
then you have the dynamic PAV support. However, as far as I know, 5.3
does not virtualize HyperPAV, so a guest can't use it directly,
although it can take advantage
, and CP's paging doesn't use PAV...
2008/7/3 Bruce Hayden [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The z/VM 5.3 announcement letter states that it includes HyperPAV
support for IBM System Storage DS8000. So - if you have a DS8000,
then you have the dynamic PAV support. However, as far as I know, 5.3
does
Appreciate all of the responses so far. The Hitachi UPS V is relatively
new on the market and was not ordered with any PAV in the initial buy.
Yesit will be FICON attached and serve two z/OS LPARs along with a
z/VM system with two IFLs.
I have read the z/VM 5.3 enhancement notes talking
Are you concerned you'll need PAV as you consolidate current
volumes? or as you grow current workloads? If the former, I'd
suggest looking at some statistics like I/O rate per GB of
disk storage. For example if you are doing 15 I/Os a second on
a 2.7GB disk, that's 5.6 I/Os/GB. If you are then
ago or so [we did a huge DASD
migration]), each time our storage group got a new disk array (IBM or
Hitachi, whatever), they would hard-code PAV alias addresses into the
DASD subsystem ... because z/OS needed that. When this was done, z/VM
5.3 could see and use the PAV alias(es) (for non-z/OS volumes
Hi Sam,
Was hoping someone would have a better idea by now or something
changed in PerfKit since FL510VM63706 or We don't use Toolkit
anymore, but the identify was fronted by some simple HTML in the
module. It wasn't terribly difficult to code a zap and change the
behavior. Doing so, you
Hi,
Coming from a z/OS background I have the RMF Data Portal deployed and we
allow anyone inside our network to view it. I would like to deploy the
z/VM Performance Toolkit web interface in the same way. I cannot find
anyway to allow this.
In RMF DDS SYS1.PARMLIB(GPMSRV00)
/*
On Monday, 06/02/2008 at 09:40 EDT, Stricklin, Raymond J
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks --
Is RSU 5304 orderable on shopzseries yet?
http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/rsu/stk530.html shows 5304RSU current as
of May 20, but when I log in to ShopzSeries, the 5303 stacked RSU from
December 12
Stricklin, Raymond J wrote:
Folks --
Is RSU 5304 orderable on shopzseries yet?
http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/rsu/stk530.html shows 5304RSU current as
of May 20, but when I log in to ShopzSeries, the 5303 stacked RSU from
December 12 is the most recent of the orderable options.
Am I missing
Folks --
Is RSU 5304 orderable on shopzseries yet?
http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/rsu/stk530.html shows 5304RSU current as
of May 20, but when I log in to ShopzSeries, the 5303 stacked RSU from
December 12 is the most recent of the orderable options.
Am I missing something or is it just not
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
05/26/2008 03:46:17 PM:
Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
e49l124d kernel: zfcp: error: Point-to-point fibrechannel
configuration detected at adapter 0.0.5500 unsupported, shutting down
adapter
Sounds
Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
e49l124d kernel: zfcp: error: Point-to-point fibrechannel
configuration detected at adapter 0.0.5500 unsupported, shutting down
adapter
Sounds like you may not have support built into the particular Linux
kernel you're running. Tried a kernel
From: Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 12:33 PM
To: 'The IBM z/VM Operating System'
Subject: FCP using z/VM 5.3 and RedHat Linux 4.6
Hi All,
Has anyone run into the following error while trying to get FCP to work
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FCP using z/VM 5.3 and RedHat Linux 4.6
It's Memorial Day weekend in the U.S.n you may not get a lot of answers
today. And... You may get better results asking on the Linux390 list.
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
Thanks Mark. I was not quite ready for a live lesson in reconfiguring
the Kernel!!!
Terry
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 9:29 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FCP using z/VM
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:46 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jack
Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
Sounds like you may not have support built into the particular Linux
kernel you're running. Tried a kernel reconfig?
Please don't recommend things like that unless you also include a
My Linux system is at 4.6 I will need to verify what my kernel level is.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Raymond Higgs
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 4:17 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FCP using z/VM
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:17 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Raymond
Higgs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
Support for switched topologies came first. If you want point-to-point,
you have to use a newer version of linux. According to one of the cross
reference sites, you need at least
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FCP using z/VM 5.3 and RedHat Linux 4.6
Use the command uname -a to check the kernel level.
Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
My Linux system is at 4.6 I will need to verify what my kernel level
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*On Behalf Of *Raymond Higgs
*Sent:* Monday, May 26, 2008 4:17 PM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: FCP using z/VM 5.3 and RedHat Linux 4.6
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
05/26/2008 03:46:17 PM:
Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR
Hi,
problem is solved because it occured on z/VM 4.4 and due to out of service
I moved to a more recent version and everything works fine :)
Thanks!
--
With kind regards/Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
your/Ihr SuSE Team
Wolfgang Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
We took two CP abends Code (Hard) FRE016 which appears to be a header
block clobber caused by the an application CA's VMSECURE. Level is z/VM
5.3 service level 0702.
I loaded both Dumps down to OPERATNS 191 disk using DUMPLOAD and than
tried to run a DUMPSCAN and receive a HCSPRC740I
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:16 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Dumpscan CP Abend z/VM 5.3
We took two CP abends Code (Hard) FRE016 which appears to be a header
block clobber caused by the an application CA's VMSECURE. Level is z/VM
5.3 service level 0702.
I loaded both Dumps down
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Dumpscan CP Abend z/VM 5.3
We took two CP abends Code (Hard) FRE016 which appears to be a header
block clobber caused by the an application CA's VMSECURE. Level is z/VM
5.3 service level 0702.
I loaded both Dumps down to OPERATNS 191 disk using DUMPLOAD and than
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:16 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Dumpscan CP Abend z/VM 5.3
We took two CP abends Code (Hard) FRE016 which appears to be a header
block clobber caused by the an application CA's VMSECURE. Level is z/VM
5.3 service level 0702.
I loaded both Dumps down
. APAR VM64281 for z/VM 5.3 (only) provides a port
isolation function that prevents guests on the same VSWITCH or VLAN (if
the VSWITCH is VLAN-aware) from talking directly to each other. You can
decide what to do with packets destined for other guests on the LAN
segment: silently drop them
System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
04/22/2008 08:28 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: New z/VM 5.3 VSWITCH Port Isolation function
Alan,
the subject brought me to a question I have in mind for some time
I have done a DDR restore of the 5.3 system and am in the throes of
applying the current RSU. To this end, I have FTPd the files from IBM to
my VM system with the following results:
1. There were three files
* A small file containing the byte counts for the other two files
* A file
mixed products or versions on an order.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 3:21 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: z/VM 5.3 vs. RSU
.marist.edu/~mvmua/
Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
04/17/2008 03:21 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
z/VM 5.3 vs. RSU
I have done a DDR
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: z/VM 5.3 vs. RSU
I have done a DDR restore of the 5.3 system and am in the throes of
applying the current RSU. To this end, I have FTPd the files from IBM to
my VM system with the following results:
1. There were three files
* A small file containing
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z/VM 5.3 vs. RSU
Use the VMFINS command for RSU files. VMFREC is for corrective service
envelopes.
vmfins install info (nomemo env RLST5794
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Thursday, April
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 vs. RSU
Use the VMFINS command for RSU files. VMFREC is for corrective
service envelopes.
vmfins install info (nomemo env RLST5794
From: The IBM z/VM
On Thursday, 04/17/2008 at 03:50 EDT, Hodge, Robert L
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use the VMFINS command for RSU files. VMFREC is for corrective service
envelopes.
SERVICE is the preferred way to apply service, whether corrective or
preventive.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
1 - 100 of 283 matches
Mail list logo
