On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 04:38:02PM -, Andy Woolley wrote:
Well, it certainly seems to be pointing to MySQL.com alright.
Although the domain name registrant is still NuSphere and DNS still
appears to be handled by NuSphere's command the IPAddress it
resolves to is definitely that of
Hi,
Well, it certainly seems to be pointing to MySQL.com alright.
Although the domain name registrant is still NuSphere and DNS still appears
to be handled by NuSphere's command the IPAddress it resolves to is
definitely that of MySQL.com.
Hmmm, I certainly hope this is justice and not just
John Birrell wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
next meeting.
Since these issues are between two private companies, please
Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
your discussions off this list. It is none of our business. By
all means, tell us the result.
This discussion most certainly is our business. I would appeal to both MySQL AB and
NuShphere to keep
discussions as public as is
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:13:15PM +0100, Mark Tiramani wrote:
Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
your discussions off this list. It is none of our business. By
all means, tell us the result.
This discussion most certainly is our business.
No it's not.
John Birrell wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:13:15PM +0100, Mark Tiramani wrote:
Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
your discussions off this list. It is none of our business. By
all means, tell us the result.
This discussion most certainly is
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
next meeting.
Britt...
Britt, thanks for the update. The neutral tone and lack of
result make
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
next meeting.
Britt...
Britt, thanks for the update. The neutral tone and lack of
substantial
Too bad it's not your list to make that decision, but
Monteys
Ruben
mysql - the database written and owned by MYSQL AB
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:13:15PM +0100, Mark Tiramani wrote:
Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
your discussions off this list. It
Michael Meltzer wrote:
thought the list might want to know, this has been picked up by a trade
magazine, I got a copy of interactive week in sail mail today. (In my best
sarcastic voice)As they say in Hollywood Any Publicity is good as long as
your spell the names right. Found a web version
Van wrote:
Michael Meltzer wrote:
thought the list might want to know, this has been picked up by a trade
magazine, I got a copy of interactive week in sail mail today. (In my best
I'd have never caught that but for the list. Thanks. Wonder what the audience
for that site is.
[ database table sql ]
Van wrote:
Michael Meltzer wrote:
thought the list might want to know, this has been picked up by a trade
magazine, I got a copy of interactive week in sail mail today. (In my best
I'd have never caught that but for the list. Thanks. Wonder what the audience
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:17:31AM -0400, Bob Hall wrote:
I think I've made it clear that I'm not enamored of NuSphere's
recent actions, which I think are remarkably bone-headed. At
I'm afraid the emotions aroused by recent events have stripped
away my thin veneer of reasonable civility
something to read in the restroom.
MJM
- Original Message -
From: Van [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: mysql.org
Michael Meltzer wrote:
thought the list might want to know, this has been picked
Absolutely great! You are so keen and brave - I wouldn't dare to
and some others obviously neither!
We need people who calm things down to make negotiations and an
agreement possible, that's absolutely true, but we also need
people to emphasize the frontiers to make a correct agreement
possible
MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
next meeting.
Britt...
--
D. Britton Johnston 603-578-6707 Nashua
Chief Technology Officer 781-280-4954 Bedford
NuSphere Corporation 781-280-4600 Main
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
next meeting.
Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
your discussions
First, I support mySQL and Open Source community. Maybe you can fight them
with their own weapon. They have made some extra applications based on
mySQL, and they sell it. You can create same applications as Open Source.
-
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:10:20AM -0700, Michael Collins wrote:
It seems to me that the bottom line is that any outcome that results
in there being a fork in the development of MySQL (with the result
being two completely different types of MySQL), or in NuSphere
retaining control of the
the same time, a NuSphere-controlled mysql.org doesn't strike me
as a disaster, provided they can do it with out shooting
themselves in the foot, as they are doing now.
Nah
There using it as a marketing ploy to dup the public.
The should have released their GPLed extentions on
Dear folks at NuSphere,
Thank you for your response to our open invitation. We disagree with a
number of your statements, but we look forward to having a phone contact
with you on Friday.
Marten Mickos
(database,sql,query,table)
the same time, a NuSphere-controlled mysql.org doesn't strike me
as a disaster, provided they can do it with out shooting
themselves in the foot, as they are doing now.
Nah
There using it as a marketing ploy to dup the public.
The should have released their GPLed extentions
Fact
MYSQL owns their trademark
Fact, what NuShpere brought form MYSQL is irrelevant as loing as they
are infrringing on the MYSQL Trademark...and they were going to do WORSE
until the public heat.
Until they apologies fo the GPL violation, and then the Trademark
infringment, they are pound
At 21:28 01-07-19, you wrote:
the same time, a NuSphere-controlled mysql.org doesn't strike me
as a disaster, provided they can do it with out shooting
themselves in the foot, as they are doing now.
Nah
There using it as a marketing ploy to dup the public.
The should
Thomas J Keller wrote:
The more I think about this, the more convinced I am that someone needs to
offer the following observations:
It is unfortunate that so many people within this community are so eager to
assume the worst about a company, simply because they ARE a company. Not all
thought the list might want to know, this has been picked up by a trade
magazine, I got a copy of interactive week in sail mail today. (In my best
sarcastic voice)As they say in Hollywood Any Publicity is good as long as
your spell the names right. Found a web version if any one wants a look.
MYSQL.NET
XMYSQL.COM
MYSQLPHP.COM
PHPMYSQL.COM
MYSQL-PHP.COM
MYSQLHOST.COM
-S
Aside from being incorrect about the process of tradmarking in the
US and the ability to defend a trademark while awaiting registry,
all these above websites are not claiming to be the official
As you are aware, we are forming a not-for-profit corporation to
focus on building and supporting a larger MySQL development
community and promoting MySQL. The mysql.org domain is expected
to be transferred to that organization. NuSphere has taken the
lead and is covering the costs of forming
Werner is correct in encouraging all to make up your own mind.
And, it is always possible that Orwellian DoubleSpeak is an
ingredient of these public statements and posturing.
But, a great distinction must be made here, and not tie the
idea of DoubleSpeak to a fear of manipulation, unless
you,
It seems to me that the bottom line is that any outcome that results
in there being a fork in the development of MySQL (with the result
being two completely different types of MySQL), or in NuSphere
retaining control of the mysql.org domain should be vehemently
rejected by the MySQL
Monty:
You started MySQL as a database server derived from msql several years ago, and,
you made it quick. You made it a bunch of other things, but, what's most
important is that you made it quick. You made it stable. Quick is good.
Stable is better. When both are paired, it's a pure win.
http://www.nusphere.org
Is available to register but I don't now why you would what to ;o).?
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 July 2001 10:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mysql.org (comments to old messages
Re: Open Invitation to NuSphere and Progress
NuSphere accepts MySQL AB's invitation to discuss resolution of
our business issues. NuSphere and MySQL AB have already spoken via
phone and confirmed discussions will commence on Friday, July 20th.
NuSphere would welcome a fresh approach by MySQL
fashion would be
welcome.
- Original Message -
From: Britt Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: mysql.org
Re: Open Invitation to NuSphere and Progress
NuSphere accepts MySQL AB's invitation to discuss
.
- Original Message -
From: Britt Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: mysql.org
Re: Open Invitation to NuSphere and Progress
NuSphere accepts MySQL AB's invitation to discuss resolution of
our
Britt:
I've read all of the posts regarding the controversy between MySQL AB and
NuSphere.
Not being a participant, I can't know all the details of your relationship
with MySQL AB, so I can only judge this in light of my own dealings with
them. Michael Widenius and David Axmark have always
[permission to come aboard, sql database query table]
Gerald R. Jensen wrote:
I wouldn't be concerned about this being discussed here on the list. After
all, we are talking about Open Source.
Gerald Jensen
-
Right, Mr. Jensen. My historical bent takes me further. I
I hate to differ with you here, John... but please check the following URL
and notice the price tag on it --
http://www.redhat.com/products/software/linux/7-1_standard.html
RedHat is betting on, correctly so, that users in general will not spend
the time and effort to download over 100 meg of
BAUMEISTER Alexandre writes:
Michael,
It's years now that I use Mysql, post/read the mailing list, try to
help you solving bugs, testing new features (like InnoDB currently).
Why ? Because I really like Mysql, GPL licence and the way you work !
What NuLsphere is doing is
Hi,
Sorry.. can't keep my mouth shut..
A few comments on the legal matter: GPL has been spoken about more then
enough here..
Trademark: If no license or agreement exists which allows nusphere to use
MYSQL AB's trademark it's probably illegal. One could think of situations
where it might be
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Justin Farnsworth
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 4:56 AM
Hassan:
I respectfully disagree with your suggestion that such a site
would spread confusion and give discredit to MySQL.
I think it is a
Guus,
Thanks for your good suggestions. Some clarifications below.
Guus Leeuw jr. wrote:
From: Dipl.-Inf. Guus Leeuw jr.
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 03:21:32 +0200
-Original Message-
From: Marten Mickos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] cut
/cut serious Our interpretation is that
I see one HUGE difference between these support sites and .net,
in regards to .com: Every one but .net clearly state that
this is a product of MySQL AB, tell people about and make
very explicit links mysql.com.
The impression I get from the .org site, is that they are promoting a
product
Andy, a clarification below
Andy Woolley wrote:
I see one HUGE difference between these support sites and .net,
in regards to .com: Every one but .net clearly state that
this is a product of MySQL AB, tell people about and make
very explicit links mysql.com.
The impression I get
Just to clarify the U.S. trademark point raised here ...
The fact that it is in the mail, in progress, or whatever is really
immaterial.
It is not at all unusual for the formal application for trademarks, service
marks, patents, copyrights, etc. to come months or even years after the
product's
Monty et al and fellow list people,
I've been following this thread with interest for the last couple days, have read all
the postings (unfortunate flames included), and my opinion has generally been: well,
there's been an unfortunate break down in communication between MySQL and NuSphere,
Well, I have gone and looked more closely at mysql.org.
I am forced to confess that I find several disheartening features at this
site. I am unwilling at this juncture to typify these issues as deliberate or
ill-intentioned, but I will say that NuSphere needs to make a concerted,
immediate
1) While they do point out that they are not affliated, and
provide a link to MySQL AB, they do not state why this is
relevant, or why someone might WANT to go to MySQL AB.
Hmmm.. The NuSphere people may not be saying very much on
this list, but they're certainly listening in on what's
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:59:14AM -0700, Michael Collins wrote:
Thank you, Michael, for accidentally posting this. :)
At 3:10 AM -0400 7/14/01, Britt Johnston wrote:
Well, what a mess. It is regretable that this legal issue
needs to be aired so publically that was certainly not my
Well, what a mess. It is regretable that this legal issue
needs to be aired so publically that was certainly not my
preference. I also will not get into a flame war, it is
not in the best interest of mysql. I appreciate all the
email I've received with advice and/or support - thanks.
It is
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 03:10:34AM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
Well, what a mess. It is regretable that this legal issue needs to
be aired so publically that was certainly not my preference. I also
will not get into a flame war, it is not in the best interest of
mysql. I appreciate all
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
[== snip, snip ==]
Jeremy:
You should be complimented for giving us a measured and
rational posting on this potentially emotional issue.
And also, it is good that Britt has clearly stated his
understanding, though perhaps a bit too late to have
prevented one of those
Justin,
I very much agree with your compliment to Jeremy for his posting.
Some notes on your posting follow.
At 14/07/01 14:03 +0200, Justin wrote:
Personally, I could care less about the mysql.org
domain issue. I, more or less, see it just as another
kind of ex-officio site supporting some
Britt == Britt Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since Monty is travelling for 30 hours or so (from Australia) I will
answer this.
Britt Well, what a mess. It is regretable that this legal issue
Britt needs to be aired so publically that was certainly not my
Britt preference. I also will
David Axmark wrote:
Britt == Britt Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since Monty is travelling for 30 hours or so (from Australia) I will
answer this.
[== snip, snip ==]
WOW!
Does everyone realize what is going on here? I don't know,
I consider this stuff historic. Perhaps, at least
Britt Johnston wrote:
As far as mysql.org goes, what NuSphere would like to see is a
non-profit organization running that site - we have been consistent
in this desire for over a year, but it has been opposed by Monty
and David. I discussed this with Monty as recently as a few weeks
ago
Alright. I have received Mr. Johnson's permission to share the email response
he made to me. it is included herewith for informational purposes without
comment or prejudice:
cut here
NOTE: personal opening comments removed for brevity
mysql.org has not been publically
In response to the posting by Thomas J Keller of Britt Johnston's text, I
feel I have to come with the following comments.
(The quoted text marked with is by Britt Johnston)
mysql.org has not been publically announced and it will take
some time for it to become the thriving community it is
Marten Mickos wrote:
In response to the posting by Thomas J Keller of Britt Johnston's text, I
feel I have to come with the following comments.
(The quoted text marked with is by Britt Johnston)
mysql.org has not been publically announced and it will take
some time for it to become the
This is very interesting, this Open Source Legal Resolution ;-)
Indeed it is.
The thing I find most interesting, and a bit scary, is the way people
seem to pick sides.
For example - vermin, scum, obscure, are just a few of the words
recently used to describe the likes of NuSphere.
The more I think about this, the more convinced I am that someone needs to
offer the following observations:
It is unfortunate that so many people within this community are so eager to
assume the worst about a company, simply because they ARE a company. Not all
corporations are Mickey$lu$h
Thomas, thanks for your suggestions. A few clarifications below.
Thomas J Keller wrote:
Marten Mickos wrote:
In response to the posting by Thomas J Keller of Britt Johnston's text, I
feel I have to come with the following comments.
(The quoted text marked with is by Britt Johnston)
-Original Message-
From: Marten Mickos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
cut
/cut
serious
Our interpretation is that even under the interim agreement,
the operation
by NuSphere of mysql.org would have been a trademark violation.
Then, Marten, tell us what the status is of the
Regarding the recent thread on NuSphere. ( Jeapardy style so you don't have
to read it again)
GPL violation or not, part of my decisions are always based on morals (hard
to find these days). Anyone trying to capture an audience using anothers
name is un-ethical and un-moral. My business
community,
open source, gpl, tld's..
these are long, long discussions, some pertinent, though not to
this valuable list. i've read many opinions, respect some,
but these are for lawyers, not hackers (in linus' sense of
the word). nevertheless, there is a message for us nerds:
let's keep it
-Original Message-
From: Marten Mickos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
cut
/cut
serious
Our interpretation is that even under the interim agreement,
the operation
by NuSphere of mysql.org would have been a trademark violation.
Then, Marten, tell us what the status
First: take it to court. Potentially expensive, and probably not good for
public relations for either party probably the only sentence that makes
sense in this affaire
from a mysql user point of view, nusphere's move is completely amateur
i can't see any intelligent motivation for it, the
hassan el forkani wrote:
First: take it to court. Potentially expensive, and probably not good for
public relations for either party probably the only sentence that makes
sense in this affaire
from a mysql user point of view, nusphere's move is completely amateur
i can't see any
Reposting because of annoying filter.
On 15 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your message cannot be posted because it appears to be either spam or
simply off topic to our filter. To bypass the filter you must include
one of the following words in your message:
database,sql,query,table
Dear MySQL team,
My University was considering to buy a number of licences of the
enhanced MySQL(tm) from Nusphere. However, now, we all the University IT
staff (managers, developers, designers, etc.) have decided to strongly
go up against any commercial contact with such a robber company called
Can't we pull the mysql.org domain from under them? Surely this breaches
domain name usage?
joel
-Original Message-
From: Michael Widenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 July 2001 06:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mysql.org
Hi!
Enhanced MySQL(tm) is as
at www.mysql.com
(or something like that)
... and by that make it clear to newcomers, that there are something to be
aware of.
Best regards
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Van [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PeterWR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:06 AM
Subject: Re
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 9:50 AM
Subject: RE: mysql.org
Can't we pull the mysql.org domain from under them? Surely this breaches
domain name usage?
joel
-Original Message-
From: Michael Widenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 July 2001 06
://genomebiology.com/
-Original Message-
From: Gerry Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:15 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mysql.org
Monty and all at MySQL,
I am
PeterWR wrote:
Hi Van,
I have no experience with Progress software.
Once, Progress must have seen their approach as the right way. That they
sonner or later see a need to change, does not approved the way it is done.
In short term, the clients for the NuSphere are already familiar
Monty:
I was on the verge of authorizing the purchase of 3 copies of NuSphere's
PHPEd package (US$300 each) for our developers when I became aware of the
controversy surrounding 'Enhanced MySQL' and mysql.org.
The purchase order went into the round file, and Hell will freeze over
before I buy
, 2001 7:15 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mysql.org
Monty and all at MySQL,
I am sorry to hear about this most unfortunate situation. It is sad to see
that NuSphere have taken it upon themselves
Gerald R. Jensen wrote:
Monty:
I was on the verge of authorizing the purchase of 3 copies of NuSphere's
PHPEd package (US$300 each) for our developers when I became aware of the
controversy surrounding 'Enhanced MySQL' and mysql.org.
The purchase order went into the round file, and
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:49 AM
To: Gerald R. Jensen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mysql.org
Gerald R. Jensen wrote:
Monty:
I was on the verge of authorizing the purchase of 3 copies of NuSphere's
PHPEd package (US$300 each) for our developers
Hi,
The article mentions that the Web site will confuse new users, but I
think this one will confuse them even more:
http://mysql.net/
(for non-Japanese users that is).
Korean, actually.
--
Matthias Urlichs (being exceedingly helpful today)
Hi!
Tim == Tim Endres [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If anyone has any comments about how we at MySQL AB work as an open
source company, please write to our CEO Marten Mickos via
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and we will welcome your suggestions. We are
totally dependent on the trust of our users, as
Well.
It should be an interesting Open Source convention in
San Diego later this month...
database,sql,query,table
--
Paul DuBois, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php
Hi!
cut
Sander I do not deny their claim on the trademark OR domain,
but I am
Sander somewhat unpleasantly surprised by the means they try
to resolve
Sander this matter, and the fact that nobody in a what I
assume is an
Sander internet-aware company like MySQL even considered
I am far from a legal expert on this... but is it all that bad that
NuSphere wishes to sell a derivative work of MySQL? Other than it competes
with MySQL AB's business of selling their own commercial deployments of the
package? And by that I can somewhat see why NuSphere is using the phrase
Hi!
btjones == btjones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
btjones I am far from a legal expert on this... but is it all that bad that
btjones NuSphere wishes to sell a derivative work of MySQL? Other than it competes
btjones with MySQL AB's business of selling their own commercial deployments of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am far from a legal expert on this... but is it all that bad that
NuSphere wishes to sell a derivative work of MySQL? Other than it competes
with MySQL AB's business of selling their own commercial deployments of the
package? And by that I can somewhat see why
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:36:08 -0700
I am far from a legal expert on this... but is it all that bad that
NuSphere wishes to sell a derivative work of MySQL? Other than it competes
with MySQL AB's business
database,sql,query,table
Now most of us in/using Open Source probably do not _really_
understand the meaning and ramifications of the GPL. We _think_
we know, and we certainly have a feeling about what the GPL
means.
Oh Bull
Making a derived work from a GPL product and
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 12:44:43PM -0700, Michael Collins wrote:
The article mentions that the Web site will confuse new users, but I
think this one will confuse them even more:
http://mysql.net/
So maybe mislead would have been a more precise word?
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sander Pilon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think all of us should send a letter to the people who appropriated
the MySQL.org name. In my opinion, if MySQL AB wants this domain they
should have the right to it. To me, it is a show of disrespect to the
fine folks at MySQL AB and I am
Sander Pilon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think all of us should send a letter to the people who
appropriated
the MySQL.org name. In my opinion, if MySQL AB wants this
domain they
should have the right to it. To me, it is a show of
disrespect to the
fine folks at MySQL
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 01:03:19AM +0200, Sander Pilon wrote:
Rule number one on the internet: If you have a trademark, GET THE
.COM, .NET, .ORG, .CC and .CX ASAP!!!
The fine folks at MySQL ignored that rule, and are now left with a
rotten situation. IMHO, their own fault - and the way
If anyone has any comments about how we at MySQL AB work as an open
source company, please write to our CEO Marten Mickos via
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and we will welcome your suggestions. We are
totally dependent on the trust of our users, as everything we do are
open source, and we are trying
Hi Monty,
When reading Your comments, I became very sorry for You and MySQL.
With almost four years experience on MySQL on Windows, I have had no
problems of any kind. You and Your people are doing a great job both on the
software and on the support - other major players could learn from MySQL
PeterWR wrote:
Then you can start wondering why one software company wants to promote open
source by using another companys software - why is the Progress database
not good enough for NuSphere ???
Best regards
Peter
Copnehagen Denmark
Peter:
Have your ever worked with Progress?
Monty and all at MySQL,
I am sorry to hear about this most unfortunate situation. It is sad to see
that NuSphere have taken it upon themselves to attempt to steal your
intellectual property and try to benefit from all of the MySQL team's
hard work. My company has been licensing using MySQL for
96 matches
Mail list logo
