On Sunday 02 January 2005 20:01, SnapafunFrank wrote:
What I had in mind is that a onboard mail client be established that
would allow any email client to get the email via it, appoint klamav to
check the email coming through and going out at this point - basically
all email passes this
Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Sunday 02 January 2005 20:01, SnapafunFrank wrote:
What I had in mind is that a onboard mail client be established that
would allow any email client to get the email via it, appoint klamav to
check the email coming through and going out at this point - basically
all
On Monday 03 January 2005 17:30, SnapafunFrank wrote:
If you run a local copy of an MTA like Postfix,
and route your ISP mail through that local MTA, you can push mail through
a virus checker prior to local delivery.
Exactly what I believe ought to be available always. Let the more
Anne Wilson wrote:
I don't use Evo, but IIRC it uses mdir format, which means that each message
is in a separate file (mbox puts a whole mail folder into one file). This
being so, if you can identify which messages are the infected ones you can
safely delete them, leaving all others.
Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Saturday 01 January 2005 09:39, Graham Watkins wrote:
Wish it were that simple. I'm not running a mail server with windows
clients. This is a dual booting stand alone machine and I never use
windows for downloading mail. (In fact I use it as little as possible.)
Do the
deedee E wrote:
I confess to some confusion about your problem. Is there some
reason you are forced to execute the worm-infested e-mail while
running Windows? Why not just treat it like junk mail and delete
it? Isn't it junk mail?
I'm not executing anything. I'm not doing anything with mail in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 02 Jan 2005 11:20, Graham Watkins wrote:
.evolution/mail/local/Inbox: Worm.Bagle.AP FOUND
.evolution/mail/local/Inbox.sbd/Newbie: Worm.SomeFool.P FOUND
(rest of scan snipped)
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 25253
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 02 Jan 2005 11:43, Anne Wilson wrote:
The viruses do not come in on genuine mail. The headers may suggest that
they are from a reputable source, but they never are. Many are instantly
recognisable as emails that you have not solicited.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 02 Jan 2005 13:42, Graham Watkins wrote:
And it's a pity that no-one knows how to make klammail work properly
because that looked like a pretty good way of dealing with infected mails.
Why not try the kde mailing lists? I presume
On Sunday 02 January 2005 06:20, Graham Watkins wrote:
Yes. I have copies of all three on my Linux system. I also do not use
Windows for mail. You don't have to run windows to end up with your
email address being used by someone else who does have Windows and who
gets infected with a
On Sunday 02 January 2005 12:43 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
There are no dodgy files .exe, .com, .pif or otherwise.
The problem there is that virus writers realise that we now recognise
these, so they use a variety of tricks to hide the .exe or whatever. I
think it goes something like
OK
I have been following this thread to hopefully find a suitable way of
appeasing those that call on me to help them with their SOHO setups. (
Myself included. )
How about we attack this problem by starting over so as to attempt to
save relevant emails that the original poster is trying to
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 11:20:43 +, Graham Watkins wrote:
deedee E wrote:
I confess to some confusion about your problem. Is there some
reason you are forced to execute the worm-infested e-mail while
running Windows? Why not just treat it like junk mail and delete
it? Isn't it junk
Hi Graham,
I have yet to install clam av, but I just wanted to point out that the viruses
being detected are most likely windows viruses that would pass through a
linux system without being able to cause any harm.
The reason clam av detects these is because linux is often used as a mail
JR wrote:
Hi Graham,
I have yet to install clam av, but I just wanted to point out that the viruses
being detected are most likely windows viruses that would pass through a
linux system without being able to cause any harm.
The reason clam av detects these is because linux is often used as a
Graham Watkins wrote:
Do the names Worm.bagle.AP, Worm.Somefool.P, SCO.A mean anything here?
As I mentioned, klamav claims to be able to quarantine messages
containing viruses and worms but the component klammail doesn't seem to
exist on my system - ideas, anyone?
I've just done a search on
I found a variation of SCO.A here
http://www.stacken.kth.se/lists/best-forestry/2004-01/msg00157.html
it's referenced as Worm.SCO.A
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club :
On Saturday 01 Jan 2005 2:39 pm, Graham Watkins wrote:
JR wrote:
Hi Graham,
I have yet to install clam av, but I just wanted to point out that
the viruses being detected are most likely windows viruses that
would pass through a linux system without being able to cause any
harm.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 01 Jan 2005 15:33, Richard Urwin wrote:
Wish it were that simple. I'm not running a mail server with windows
clients. This is a dual booting stand alone machine and I never use
windows for downloading mail. (In fact I use it as
On Saturday 01 January 2005 09:39, Graham Watkins wrote:
Wish it were that simple. I'm not running a mail server with windows
clients. This is a dual booting stand alone machine and I never use
windows for downloading mail. (In fact I use it as little as possible.)
Do the names
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:39:24 +, Graham Watkins wrote:
Wish it were that simple. I'm not running a mail server with
windows clients. This is a dual booting stand alone machine and
I never use windows for downloading mail. (In fact I use it as
little as possible.)
I confess to some
Inhabitant of Zion wrote:
So zap them before they even hit your machine:
Just found out how to set my server to return to sender all mails to
unknown users.
Not ideal but at least I am getting a bit of peace and quite again!
:-)
I'm not sure if you want to do that. If it's anything like
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Virus laden e-mail
According to the 'Received:' trace, the message originated at:
[220.244.219.186]
linux-mandrake.com (220-244-219-186-qld.tpgi.com.au
[220.244.219.186])
I have gotten 3-4 from the same IP
Glad I proved helpful once I had time to write an extended reply.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: Inhabitant of Zion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
OK I've read with interest some of your replies. It would seem that
what I have actually been doing is rejecting any emails sent to me
whereby
On Thursday 16 December 2004 23:27, jdow wrote:
Humble (moi! humble?) request, please be careful with terminology, even
if AOL and Microsoft are sloppy as hell. Bounce sends a message back to
the purported sender, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rejects simply reject it from the
server forwarding the email
JoeHill wrote:
Actually, I've found several times that AVG catches malware that Norton doesn't,
and it's free, and got a *way* smaller footprint than Norton's bloatware.
I use Avast! antivirus for Windoze. seems to be quicker than AVG,
and it's free!
They also offer a version for Linux
JoeHill wrote
Takes more time, but in the long run,
if everyone did this, well, it would totally destroy the cost/benefit ratio for
spammers.
I do this religiously, using SpamCop...
Trouble is, virtually all the pharmacy/porn sites are either on Brazilian or
Chinese servers. they have abuse
From: J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JoeHill wrote
I have resorted to doing a WHOIS on the domain name, and if any info is
found to be false, taking it up with the registrar... at least the site gets
pulled, if only to pop up elsewhere a day or so later.
Hey, Dude, where's your sense of fun? Every once
a Chinese ISP, I get sorry, mailbox over quota
Humph.
JRH
- Original Message -
From: jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Virus laden e-mail
From: J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JoeHill wrote
I have resorted to doing a WHOIS
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 11:35 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 07:32:54PM -0500, Greg Meyer wrote:
Is anybody else on this list getting bombarded with virus laden e-mail
from a particular ip address in Australia?
Whoever it is is sending to the address that I use for
I figure the damage is already done by the time it gets to that mailbox
over quota message. The Chinese government probably raises heck with the
ISP Word is that they snoop EVERYTHING.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey, Dude, where's your sense of fun? Every
JoeHill wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:32:49 +
Inhabitant of Zion disseminated the following:
I have set up so they all go straight to the trash but it sure is a
pain in the neck as I am having to remove from the trash about 1800
every hour.
So zap them before they even hit your machine:
According to the 'Received:' trace, the message originated at:
[220.244.219.186]
linux-mandrake.com (220-244-219-186-qld.tpgi.com.au
[220.244.219.186])
I have gotten 3-4 from the same IP range, all tpgi.com.au. I
usually warn users but no one ever pay attention so I figured I
has anyone heard of 'xunil live'?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
I do not get any that are not picked up by either my filters or
clamav.
They get picked up but I get an annoying message sent to me by Clamav
saying a message with a virus was sent and has been quarantined.
So I get a mail to me to delete and a .msg and a .log file to get rid
of from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 16 Dec 2004 00:32, Greg Meyer wrote:
Is anybody else on this list getting bombarded with virus laden e-mail from
a particular ip address in Australia?
Whoever it is is sending to the address that I use for the Mandrake lists,
so I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 16 Dec 2004 07:29, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:27:02 +
Inhabitant of Zion wrote:
I have been getting a load from Germany and also a shed load yesterday
from DHTMLcentral.
I feel neglected and under
On Thursday 16 December 2004 00:14, Hugh Dixon wrote:
What's the IP address?
I fit the profile, and as our windows admin is not around, I cannot
check the status of our antivirus software...
According to the 'Received:' trace, the message originated at:
[220.244.219.186]
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 02:29:41 -0500
Charles A Edwards disseminated the following:
I have been getting a load from Germany and also a shed load yesterday
from DHTMLcentral.
I feel neglected and under privileged.
I do not get any that are not picked up by either my filters or clamav.
On Thursday 16 Dec 2004 14:37, JoeHill wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 02:29:41 -0500
Charles A Edwards disseminated the following:
I have been getting a load from Germany and also a shed load yesterday
from DHTMLcentral.
I feel neglected and under privileged.
I do not get any that are
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:32:49 +
Inhabitant of Zion disseminated the following:
I have set up so they all go straight to the trash but it sure is a
pain in the neck as I am having to remove from the trash about 1800
every hour.
So zap them before they even hit your machine:
So zap them before they even hit your machine:
Just found out how to set my server to return to sender all mails to
unknown users.
Not ideal but at least I am getting a bit of peace and quite again!
:-)
--
John Willby Registered Linux user number 321644
ICQ: 92791912 MSN: [EMAIL
On Thursday 16 December 2004 10:55, John Bowden wrote:
Ok you have got me worried now !Is it a win virus or one writen for Linux?
How do I check that clam is working and configure it. I have a smoothwall
firewall so I don't worry too much about the worms and it's logs tell me if
a trojan has
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:55:22 +
John Bowden disseminated the following:
Ok you have got me worried now !Is it a win virus or one writen for Linux?
Guaranteed it's someone's Windows box has been zombied with a worm and is
spewing this crap.
As far as I know, there are *no* Linux viruses in
On Thursday 16 December 2004 05:46 am, Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Thursday 16 December 2004 00:14, Hugh Dixon wrote:
What's the IP address?
I fit the profile, and as our windows admin is not around, I cannot
check the status of our antivirus software...
According to the 'Received:' trace,
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 11:32, Greg Meyer wrote:
Is anybody else on this list getting bombarded with virus laden e-mail from a
particular ip address in Australia?
Whoever it is is sending to the address that I use for the Mandrake lists, so
I am thinking it may be one of our newbie windows
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 15:35, Todd Slater wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 07:32:54PM -0500, Greg Meyer wrote:
Is anybody else on this list getting bombarded with virus laden e-mail from
a
particular ip address in Australia?
Whoever it is is sending to the address that I use for the
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 02:55, John Bowden wrote:
On Thursday 16 Dec 2004 14:37, JoeHill wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 02:29:41 -0500
Charles A Edwards disseminated the following:
I have been getting a load from Germany and also a shed load yesterday
from DHTMLcentral.
I feel
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 21:46, Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Thursday 16 December 2004 00:14, Hugh Dixon wrote:
What's the IP address?
I fit the profile, and as our windows admin is not around, I cannot
check the status of our antivirus software...
According to the 'Received:' trace, the
Yes, your MSN monicker is indeed correct. You are a sillydilly.
Well OK then rather that telling me how stupid I am why not
make some sort of constructive suggestion.
I did a who-is search on host14-206.pool8172.interbusiness.it and got
bugger all.
Found out the IP to be 81.72.206.14
I
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:07:02 -0800
jdow disseminated the following:
When I find some idiot doing this
Okay, that was a little much...and I'm an expert on such things, ask anyone
here! :-D
--
JoeHill / RLU #282046 / www.freeyourmachine.org
19:19:16 up 25 days, 10:30, 4 users, load average:
From: Inhabitant of Zion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, your MSN monicker is indeed correct. You are a sillydilly.
Well OK then rather that telling me how stupid I am why not
make some sort of constructive suggestion.
In a word: SpamAssassin
{^_^}
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:14:56 +
Inhabitant of Zion disseminated the following:
I did a who-is search on host14-206.pool8172.interbusiness.it and got
bugger all.
Found out the IP to be 81.72.206.14
Do a whois on the IP :-)
I tried -
ipchains -A INPUT -s 81.72.206.14 -j DROP
Yes, your MSN monicker is indeed correct. You are a sillydilly.
Well OK then rather that telling me how stupid I am why not
make some sort of constructive suggestion.
I did a who-is search on host14-206.pool8172.interbusiness.it and got
bugger all.
Found out the IP to be 81.72.206.14
On Thursday 16 December 2004 20:09, JoeHill wrote:
Ideally what I want to do is to get my server to just say Bog off
when the delivery attempt is made.
Well, AFAIK, the only way to do that is with a bounce, and there's the rub.
Actually, not necessarily. In Postfix, if you setup to reject
From: JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ideally what I want to do is to get my server to just say Bog off
when the delivery attempt is made.
Well, AFAIK, the only way to do that is with a bounce, and there's the
rub. When
you bounce, you just doubled the 'damage' that the spam mail caused, and
as
From: Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 16 December 2004 20:09, JoeHill wrote:
Ideally what I want to do is to get my server to just say Bog off
when the delivery attempt is made.
Well, AFAIK, the only way to do that is with a bounce, and there's the
rub.
Actually, not
Hi
OK I've read with interest some of your replies. It would seem that
what I have actually been doing is rejecting any emails sent to me
whereby the user is not registered on my server.
It would seem that the option in my server manager panel that handles
postfix and that I thought was
Hi
Its a windows virus -
Zafi.D
It seems it gets your address from somewhere and then starts sending
you an email every 2 seconds.
I have set up so they all go straight to the trash but it sure is a
pain in the neck as I am having to remove from the trash about 1800
every hour.
Glad I've got
On Thursday 16 Dec 2004 16:32, Inhabitant of Zion wrote:
Hi
Its a windows virus -
Zafi.D
It seems it gets your address from somewhere and then starts sending
you an email every 2 seconds.
I have set up so they all go straight to the trash but it sure is a
pain in the neck as I am having
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:25:38 +
Inhabitant of Zion disseminated the following:
So zap them before they even hit your machine:
Just found out how to set my server to return to sender all mails to
unknown users.
Not ideal but at least I am getting a bit of peace and quite again!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So zap them before they even hit your machine:
Just found out how to set my server to return to sender all mails to
unknown users.
Not ideal but at least I am getting a bit of peace and quite again!
:-)
--
John Willby Registered Linux user number
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 07:32 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
Is anybody else on this list getting bombarded with virus laden
e-mail from a particular ip address in Australia?
I got one a few hours ago, but so far just one and i thought it was
addressed to the list. I did what I always do with
From: Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anybody else on this list getting bombarded with virus laden e-mail
from a
particular ip address in Australia?
Whoever it is is sending to the address that I use for the Mandrake lists,
so
I am thinking it may be one of our newbie windows users.
If you
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 11:28 pm, Dan Gordon wrote:
Oh yeah there is this new worm out was made just for Christmas.
Sick bast**s
Here is the link.
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/12/15/holiday.worm/index.html
Regards,
Dan Gordon
--
Wed Dec 15 23:32:08 EST 2004
23:32:08 up
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 07:32:54PM -0500, Greg Meyer wrote:
Is anybody else on this list getting bombarded with virus laden e-mail from a
particular ip address in Australia?
Whoever it is is sending to the address that I use for the Mandrake lists, so
I am thinking it may be one of our
What's the IP address?
I fit the profile, and as our windows admin is not around, I cannot
check the status of our antivirus software...
hd
-Original Message-
From: Greg Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 16 December 2004 11:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie]
Hi
I have been getting a load from Germany and also a shed load yesterday
from DHTMLcentral.
Nice...
--
John Willby Registered Linux user number 321644
ICQ: 92791912 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux is like a wigwam - No Gates, no Windows, Apache inside.
07:27:01 up 3 days, 22:35, 1 user,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 07:27:02 +
Inhabitant of Zion wrote:
I have been getting a load from Germany and also a shed load yesterday
from DHTMLcentral.
I feel neglected and under privileged.
I do not get any that are not picked up by either my filters or clamav.
Charles
--
Talking
How can you know exactly who it came from? I realize that such mostly
comes from infected windoze boxes, and I'm thinking that someone out
there who has my email in their address book has a virus which has been
spoofing my address, like the one Tom Karen Pino got. The question is
who?
I
Russell W. Behne wrote:
Friday at 18:39, Tom Karen Pino wrote:
To anyone this may concern,
I received this notice from my ISP today.
A message which was sent to you by Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been
identified by our virus filter as being contaminated with a virus. For
your protection, the
Russell W. Behne wrote:
Saturday at 21:06, Randall D. Hobbs wrote:
Yeah, you're right there. I've had people email me asking why I sent them a
virus... I only had to say I'm running Linux, so I can't send you a virus.
That and check out the headers - that's what tells the truth. I recently
Tom Karen Pino wrote:
Russell W. Behne wrote:
Friday at 18:39, Tom Karen Pino wrote:
To anyone this may concern,
I received this notice from my ISP today.
A message which was sent to you by Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been
identified by our virus filter as being contaminated with a virus.
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 23:15, Tom Karen Pino wrote:
I, too, would love to know how to trace these things and perhaps send
them a present.
Don't even try! It would double the (negative) effect of exactly that what it
is trying to douse up our bandwidth and incriminate non-M$
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 22:19, Tom Karen Pino wrote:
Russell W. Behne wrote:
Saturday at 21:06, Randall D. Hobbs wrote:
Yeah, you're right there. I've had people email me asking why I sent them
a virus... I only had to say I'm running Linux, so I can't send you a
virus. That and check
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:52:03 +0200
Alexander Ruoff disseminated the following:
How can you know exactly who it came from? I realize that such mostly
comes from infected windoze boxes, and I'm thinking that someone out
there who has my email in their address book has a virus which has been
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 17:15, Tom Karen Pino wrote:
Russ,
I was sure that this was spoofing. Most of the crap that we get is.
The perp probably gets the names from the archives.
Consider asking your ISP to implement Sender Policy Framework. It effectively
nullifies the ability of
Tom Karen Pino wrote:
Russell W. Behne wrote:
Hi Tom,
No, that message isn't from me. I never use the word `Hello' on
the Subject: line. Someone obviously spoofed my email address. If you
can bounce a copy to me I'd appreciate it. And if anyone knows how to
find out who actually did it, and
Saturday at 21:06, Randall D. Hobbs wrote:
Yeah, you're right there. I've had people email me asking why I sent them a
virus... I only had to say I'm running Linux, so I can't send you a virus.
That and check out the headers - that's what tells the truth. I recently
had about 10 viruses
Friday at 18:39, Tom Karen Pino wrote:
To anyone this may concern,
I received this notice from my ISP today.
A message which was sent to you by Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been
identified by our virus filter as being contaminated with a virus. For
your protection, the original message has
Randall D. Hobbs wrote:
On Friday 22 October 2004 07:39 pm, Tom Karen Pino wrote:
A message which was sent to you by Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been
identified by our virus filter as being contaminated with a virus. For your
protection, the original message has been placed into the greymail
On Saturday 23 October 2004 08:04 pm, Tom Karen Pino wrote:
I keep getting things from [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am well aware
that I did not send this and so assume that a lot of the spam I get is
from a bogus adress.
Yeah, you're right there. I've had people email me asking why I sent them a
On Friday 22 October 2004 07:39 pm, Tom Karen Pino wrote:
A message which was sent to you by Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been
identified by our virus filter as being contaminated with a virus. For your
protection, the original message has been placed into the greymail
quarantine area. To
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 04:06, Bryan Phinney wrote:
Someone running windows that has service through an ISP in Uruguay is infected
with the Netsky virus. If you run windows and have dial-up service in
Uruguay, you need to check your system and disinfect it.
(Good - I'm off the hook)
--
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 07:55 pm, Aidan Holmes wrote:
Does anybody out there know of/use/recommend a virus scanning package
for linux? I'm hoping to use one to scan clients hard drives without
having to leave mandrake and boot into Winblows XP.
Spamassasin has prebuilt filters that can be
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
Mate, I am in the same boat - except I bring my customer's boxen in here
to the lab and connect them to the network. I've been using ClamScan and
F-Prot - both free - both updatable. Work like a charm.
Clamscan: www.clamav.net
F-Prot: www.f-prot.com
stephen kuhn - owner
That
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 10:45, Aidan Holmes wrote:
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
Mate, I am in the same boat - except I bring my customer's boxen in here
to the lab and connect them to the network. I've been using ClamScan and
F-Prot - both free - both updatable. Work like a charm.
Clamscan:
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 12:55, Aidan Holmes wrote:
Does anybody out there know of/use/recommend a virus scanning package
for linux? I'm hoping to use one to scan clients hard drives without
having to leave mandrake and boot into Winblows XP.
I use a removeable HDD bay for this purpose as
ClamAV and F-Prot can both scan a windows partition from Linux.
However, I doubt they would be much help if you are trying to clean an ntfs
partition.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aidan Holmes
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 10:56
Well from a commercial point of view.
1. www.sophos.com has a Linux anti virus client, its easy enough to install as
long as you have glibc installed, well an up to date version that is. The
linux .tar.gz file(s) are all on the cd's and I can reccomend it, as I use it
personally at work, and it
Anne Wilson wrote:
Increasingly, members of this list are being accused of sending
virused emails. I know that some of you have no choice but to use
windows for part of your life, but PLEASE, if you do, check that you
are clean. Our addresses are being picked up from somewhere, and
more and
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 13:32, robin wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
Increasingly, members of this list are being accused of sending
virused emails. I know that some of you have no choice but to
use windows for part of your life, but PLEASE, if you do, check
that you are clean. Our
robin wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
Increasingly, members of this list are being accused of sending
virused emails. I know that some of you have no choice but to use
windows for part of your life, but PLEASE, if you do, check that you
are clean. Our addresses are being picked up from somewhere,
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 07:07, John Richard Smith wrote:
robin wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
Increasingly, members of this list are being accused of sending
virused emails. I know that some of you have no choice but to use
windows for part of your life, but PLEASE, if you do, check that
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:52:58 +, Anne Wilson wrote
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 13:32, robin wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
Increasingly, members of this list are being accused of sending
virused emails. I know that some of you have no choice but to
use windows for part of your life,
Scott said:
From my experience, this virus isn't just scanning
address books and
flailing away. It's mixing and matching so if it
finds [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in an infected computer,
it's going to fake
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 4:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Virus problems
Scott said:
From my experience, this virus isn't just scanning
address books and
flailing away. It's mixing and matching so if it
finds [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:05:31 -
Tony S. Sykes disseminated the following:
I can't believe a regular list user to be that naive.
That's the point, it may not be a list member. Remember, 'six degrees of
separation' ;-)
--
JoeHill
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
lol, that's what I meant, I can't believe that it is a regular list
member.
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: JoeHill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 5:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Virus problems
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:05:31 -
Tony S
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Virus problems
Scott said:
From my experience, this virus isn't just scanning
address books and
flailing away. It's mixing and matching so if it
finds [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in an infected computer,
it's going to fake
[EMAIL
1 - 100 of 272 matches
Mail list logo
