Chris Ilias writes:
>
> On 11-06-15 2:13 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
> > That's typical of developers. If they don't use it, whether user it, it
> > gone be daxxxed.
>
> Phillip, prejudice comments like that are not welcome here. In the past,
> you've spread a lot of misinformation about developer
On 07.07.2011 01:01, Chris Ilias wrote:
--- Original Message ---
> On 11-07-07 1:13 AM, Rufus wrote:
>> MCBastos wrote:
>
> Guys, the gist of this discussion has been
> "You don't understand..."
> "No, /you/ don't understand..."
> "No, it's you that doesn't understand..."
>
> The discussion ha
On 11-07-07 1:13 AM, Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Guys, the gist of this discussion has been
"You don't understand..."
"No, /you/ don't understand..."
"No, it's you that doesn't understand..."
The discussion has gone nowhere and has gone on way too long. If you
care to continue it, please tak
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on "browser" - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
found another o
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 06/07/2011 19:03, Rufus told the world:
No. You just don't understand what I'm getting at. I'm not saying
"bring Mozilla to iOS". I'm saying it's not "impossible" to duplicate
the SM experience using WebKit.
For a given, very particular, very limited d
Rufus wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a "full browser" to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering e
Interviewed by CNN on 06/07/2011 19:03, Rufus told the world:
> No. You just don't understand what I'm getting at. I'm not saying
> "bring Mozilla to iOS". I'm saying it's not "impossible" to duplicate
> the SM experience using WebKit.
For a given, very particular, very limited definition of
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:07:23 -0700, /Rufus/:
The premise that Apple "won't allow" is simply false - period. The
you don't want to swim in their pool?..fine. Just say so. But It's
not "impossible". Just flat not.
Sounds like you're saying: "teleportation is not impossibl
Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:07:23 -0700, /Rufus/:
The premise that Apple "won't allow" is simply false - period. The
you don't want to swim in their pool?..fine. Just say so. But It's
not "impossible". Just flat not.
Sounds like you're saying: "teleportation is not impossible (given
enough man years
Bill Davidsen wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As for me, my personal priorities have changed as stated in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-10/personal_priorities and I moved on,
see also http://home.kairo.at/blog/2011-05/full_time_at_csi_mozilla -
which now m
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Actually, 2.3 might be something I could be interested in. Maybe. Too
many things are changing in the Mac world at once...
My big fear remains the Lion OS, it's "iOS-like" full screen app
implementation (which I hope I can turn off, or find a hack to turn off)
Rufus wrote:
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't
believe that.
And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to
requiring
XUL for our current code and not being able to
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't
believe that.
And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring
XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the w
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't
believe that.
And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring
XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on
something else
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a
non-Mozilla-based app, so please just let this thread end.
Rober
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't
believe that.
And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring
XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on
something else due to resourc
Rufus schrieb:
...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't
believe that.
And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring
XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on
something else due to resource constraints (and j
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a
non-Mozilla-based app, so please just let this thread end.
Robert Kaiser
--
Note th
Lee wrote:
On 7/4/11, Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on "browser" - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari brow
Lee wrote:
On 7/4/11, Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on "browser" - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari brow
On 7/4/11, Rufus wrote:
> Philip Chee wrote:
>> On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
>>
>>> No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
>>> search on "browser" - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
>>> that *directly* compete with Apples Safari b
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 18:16, Rufus told the world:
I do fully understand that in the case of SM I'm talking about a *brand
new* product - that certainly isn't "impossible" or "not allowed", and
there are a whole host of non-Apple branded browsing apps on Apples
store
Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 18:16, Rufus told the world:
> I do fully understand that in the case of SM I'm talking about a *brand
> new* product - that certainly isn't "impossible" or "not allowed", and
> there are a whole host of non-Apple branded browsing apps on Apples
> store ranging
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on "browser" - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser.
Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on "browser" - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
fou
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on "browser" - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
found another on
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
> No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
> search on "browser" - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
> that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
> found another one that I li
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking
chicagofan wrote:
James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As for me, my personal priorities have changed as stated in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-10/personal_priorities and I moved on,
see also http://home.kairo.at/blog/2011-05/full_time_at_csi_mozilla -
which now makes me say things lik
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a "full browser" to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then th
cyberzen wrote:
MCBastos a écrit :
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 05:11, cyberzen told the world:
MCBastos a écrit :
Now and then I click on the wrong status bar icon
and open it when what I wanted was another module...
what about quitting coffee ?
Joke all you want, but those are close
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking as a user and not a co
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking as a user and not a coder, and I
als
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a "full browser" to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code yo
On 06/20/2011 01:06 PM, James E. Morrow wrote:
> Robert Kaiser wrote:
...
>> I'm not too far away, but not here as much as previously. And I feel
>> good getting less vitriol about my work and working with people who can
>> do Mozilla stuff full-time. ;-)
>>
>> Robert Kaiser
>>
>
> As one who has
chicagofan wrote:
James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As for me, my personal priorities have changed as stated in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-10/personal_priorities and I moved on,
see also http://home.kairo.at/blog/2011-05/full_time_at_csi_mozilla -
which now makes me say things lik
James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As for me, my personal priorities have changed as stated in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-10/personal_priorities and I moved on,
see also http://home.kairo.at/blog/2011-05/full_time_at_csi_mozilla -
which now makes me say things like "A beta user
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Michael Hannon schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
In any case, happy to not be in charge any more, makes laughing about
this much easier than in earlier times.
Who's in charge now?
The collective of the SeaMonkey Council (of which I'm remaining a part,
but just as one of mul
MCBastos a écrit :
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 05:11, cyberzen told the world:
MCBastos a écrit :
Now and then I click on the wrong status bar icon
and open it when what I wanted was another module...
what about quitting coffee ?
Joke all you want, but those are closely-spaced 16px ic
Keith Whaley wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set "as
implemented"
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new* product what we
Keith Whaley wrote:
Nice analogy, MC...
keith whaley
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference i
Keith Whaley wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set "as implemented"
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about is
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/19/2011 12:00 AM, Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set "as implemented"
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new* produ
On 6/19/2011 12:00 AM, Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set "as implemented"
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set "as implemented"
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about is a set of design
requirements and i
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set "as implemented"
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about is a set of design
requirements and interface specifications - no
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking as a user and not a coder, and I
als
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking as a user and not a coder, and I
also realize this m
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:18:06 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a
Gecko browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices.
There's simply not enough users, not enough developer interest
to do i
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:18:06 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...so, Microsoft redux...big deal - Apple's turn. They make a product
which suits my desires. So I'll buy it and use it...I don't really care
about much more than that, from a user standpoint.
So then you have no right to want anything their app store doesn'
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:18:06 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> d...@kd4e.com wrote:
>
>>> If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
>>> browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
>>> not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If th
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:55:15 -0400, PhillipJones wrote:
>> If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
>> browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
>> not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
>> interest, somebody wou
>> MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 22:34, d...@kd4e.com told the world:
How does Midori, which ID's as Safari, fit in the mix?
I don't have any personal experience with Midori, but I understand from
the website that it depends on a separate standard installation of
Webkit, in
>>Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
interest, somebody would be doing it --
Rufus schrieb:
...so, Microsoft redux...big deal - Apple's turn. They make a product
which suits my desires. So I'll buy it and use it...I don't really care
about much more than that, from a user standpoint.
So then you have no right to want anything their app store doesn't
provide. They don't
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple "not allowing it" - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic bro
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a "full browser" to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you have
to writ
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
interest, somebody would be doing it -- Mozilla is fully free softw
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 22:34, d...@kd4e.com told the world:
How does Midori, which ID's as Safari, fit in the mix?
I don't have any personal experience with Midori, but I understand from
the website that it depends on a separate standard installation of
Webkit, instead of bundling
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 22:55, PhillipJones told the world:
You do know Apple is now selling Unlocked iPhones Just announced last week.
"Unlocked" means "not tied to a phone carrier." But it is still tied to
the Apple store, and subject to Apple's rules. It's not factory-jailbroken.
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
interest, somebody would be doing it -- Mozilla is fully free software,
after all.
How d
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple "not allowing it" - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic browser - somewhat SM-li
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Please don't improve the user interface, the reason I like it is that I
don't have to learn all new keystrokes and methods every 4-6 months.
The improve, is in all aspects, we don't intend to break your
experiences/learned habits there where pos
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a "full browser" to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you have
to writ
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a "full browser" to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you have
to writ
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a "full browser" to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you have
to write. The fact th
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple "not allowing it" - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic browser - somewhat SM-like, and far mo
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple "not allowing it" - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic browser - somewhat SM-like, and far more feature-rich than
S
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 22:44, Rufus told the world:
That's simply not true. I have the Atomic browser installed on my iPad
and like it...and there are others.
Atomic is not a full browser either. It does not include its own
rendering engine, but uses the iOS Safari o
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 22:44, Rufus told the world:
That's simply not true. I have the Atomic browser installed on my iPad
and like it...and there are others.
Atomic is not a full browser either. It does not include its own
rendering engine, but uses the iOS Safari one. Essentially
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 15/06/2011 22:41, Rufus told the world:
...OTOH, having bought an iPad recently is rapidly changing my work
flow/habits re: browsing Usenet and surfing the web - I was thinking
that Opera Mobile would be just the solution for iPad, but it doesn't
operate wi
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I was thinking
that Opera Mobile would be just the solution for iPad
You know that Opera Mobile is not a browser and actually send everything
you type in there to a central Opera server (and I'd guess that they try
to market the data they're collecting there
d...@kd4e.com schrieb:
So one goes from the Apple-control freaks to the Google careless-
security and spy-on-you-privacy freaks.
Should we look to Palm for hope?
Good joke. Well, HP in that case nowadays, but still.
The only bet is to try and get some mobile vendor to go and actually
ship so
Michael Hannon schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
In any case, happy to not be in charge any more, makes laughing about
this much easier than in earlier times.
Who's in charge now?
The collective of the SeaMonkey Council (of which I'm remaining a part,
but just as one of multiple people, not as
So one goes from the Apple-control freaks to the Google careless-
security and spy-on-you-privacy freaks.
Should we look to Palm for hope?
That "users don't need freedom of choice, father knows best" attitude
is why, after careful evaluation, I chose to stay away from iOS. I'm
very happy with m
Robert Kaiser wrote:
In any case, happy to not be in charge any more, makes laughing about
this much easier than in earlier times.
Robert Kaiser
Who's in charge now?
I'm sorry to hear you've stopped running the project. Thanks for your
work on the browser over the past few years (not to men
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 05:11, cyberzen told the world:
MCBastos a écrit :
Now and then I click on the wrong status bar icon
and open it when what I wanted was another module...
what about quitting coffee ?
Joke all you want, but those are closely-spaced 16px icons. It's not
that
Interviewed by CNN on 15/06/2011 22:41, Rufus told the world:
...OTOH, having bought an iPad recently is rapidly changing my work
flow/habits re: browsing Usenet and surfing the web - I was thinking
that Opera Mobile would be just the solution for iPad, but it doesn't
operate with Mail/News in t
Rufus schrieb:
I was thinking
that Opera Mobile would be just the solution for iPad
You know that Opera Mobile is not a browser and actually send everything
you type in there to a central Opera server (and I'd guess that they try
to market the data they're collecting there - I would if I woul
PhillipJones schrieb:
Answer me a Question. How many features have we users begged and plead
for developers to keep and they were removed anyway?
Fewer than the other way round. And the totally skewed sample of people
here in this newsgroup is only a tiny piece of the overall user base.
In a
MCBastos a écrit :
Now and then I click on the wrong status bar icon
and open it when what I wanted was another module...
what about quitting coffee ?
--
cyberzen
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mo
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-06-13 2:55 PM, Rufus wrote:
Dunno...I was hesitant about 2.0 (in fact, I think I waited until
2.0.something, but I only recall two basic complaints - and most of it
was over the Forms Manager. I feel like I'm reading more for 2.1,
and
On 11-06-15 2:13 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
That's typical of developers. If they don't use it, whether user it, it
gone be daxxxed.
Phillip, prejudice comments like that are not welcome here. In the past,
you've spread a lot of misinformation about developers, Mozilla,
SeaMonkey, and me, and sm
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Please don't improve the user interface, the reason I like it is that I
don't have to learn all new keystrokes and methods every 4-6 months.
The improve, is in all aspects, we don't intend to break your
experiences/learned habits there where possible. But don't fear I don'
Robert Kaiser wrote:
PhillipJones schrieb:
That's typical of developers. If they don't use it, whether user do use it, it
gone be daxxxed.
Thanks for confirming one of the reasons why I don't want to be in the
lead of this project in the future - crap like that being spread by
clueless trolls
PhillipJones schrieb:
That's typical of developers. If they don't use it, whether user it, it
gone be daxxxed.
Thanks for confirming one of the reasons why I don't want to be in the
lead of this project in the future - crap like that being spread by
clueless trolls e.g. here.
Robert Kaiser
WLS wrote:
cyberzen wrote:
WLS a écrit :
William DeCoster wrote:
Please relay to the seamonkey people. Composer: click on a graphic it
duplicates and jumps up to another location, (annoying). The graphic
does delete ok, Never an issue before this release. Other annoying
"Features" Pop Up anoun
WLS wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/12/2011 3:46 PM, WLS wrote:
The SeaMonkey people are to my knowledge not doing any development of
Composer and IMHO think it should be removed from the suite.
You are part right, there has not been much work on Composer from the
SeaMonkey team.
Thi
Bill Davidsen wrote:
WLS wrote:
William DeCoster wrote:
Please relay to the seamonkey people. Composer: click on a graphic it
duplicates and jumps up to another location, (annoying). The graphic
does delete ok, Never an issue before this release. Other annoying
"Features" Pop Up anouncements an
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/12/2011 3:46 PM, WLS wrote:
The SeaMonkey people are to my knowledge not doing any development of
Composer and IMHO think it should be removed from the suite.
You are part right, there has not been much work on Composer from the
SeaMonkey team.
This is however
WLS wrote:
William DeCoster wrote:
Please relay to the seamonkey people. Composer: click on a graphic it
duplicates and jumps up to another location, (annoying). The graphic
does delete ok, Never an issue before this release. Other annoying
"Features" Pop Up anouncements and compress email folde
Rufus wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-06-13 2:55 PM, Rufus wrote:
Dunno...I was hesitant about 2.0 (in fact, I think I waited until
2.0.something, but I only recall two basic complaints - and most of it
was over the Forms Manager. I feel like I'm reading more for 2.1, and of
wider varieties...a
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
So far, SM 2.1 has generated the largest number of problems/user
complaints I've ever read here regarding any version/release...and it's
only been a week or so.
Then you haven't been around much. I actually think the amount is pretty
low compared to 2.0 ;-)
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Jan-Galt wrote:
Rufus wrote :
William DeCoster wrote:
Please relay to the seamonkey people. Composer: click on a
graphic it
duplicates and jumps up to another location, (annoying). The graphic
does delete ok, Never an issue
PhillipJones wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 23:31, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj told the
world:
I don't bother memorizing most passwords (e-mail, websites and such) --
the unimportant ones I trust to Seamonkey, the middling-important
ones I
save in KeePass. But the ones I do mak
Rufus wrote:
Jan-Galt wrote:
[...snip...]
I already was garnering the impression that I wouldn't want to upgrade
to this version just due to some of the structural changes in it that
I've been reading about here, now I'm *convinced* I don't even want to
take it for a test drive on one of my l
Rufus wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rufus wrote:
[...snip...]
I've seen a quite a few positive comments, too, but I can't speak from
experience as I haven't installed it. For now, I'm sitting back and
reading, as I usually do, and will decide once I think I have enough
information.
There
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
That figures. Your not old enough to have problems remembering
things. As you get older you capacity to remember things gets less
and less. Not because of Dementia. But because your brain is
constantly bombarded with pieces of information to learn an
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 14/06/2011 10:09, Jay Garcia told the world:
Composer, since it's very beginning was never intended to be the
all-powerful editor for the most savvy, web-design commercial type users
but rather a simple built-in editor for those users with simple personal
w
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
