spdx-legal
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
spdx-legal meeting today
J Lovejoy
Note on inclusion principles for Exceptions List
Steve Winslow
Meeting reminder
Steve Winslow
scancode-toolkit updated to SPDX 3.20 license list
Ayan Mahapatra
Re: [spdx-tech] scancode-toolkit updated to SPDX 3.20 license list
Ayan Mahapatra
call today at top of the hour
J Lovejoy
3.20 License List release
Steve Winslow
Re: 3.20 License List release
Kate Stewart
Re: 3.20 License List release
Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
working session in 40', updates related to new license process and 3.20 release
J Lovejoy
SPDX in GSoC 2023!
Alexios Zavras
Re: SPDX in GSoC 2023!
J Lovejoy
Re: SPDX in GSoC 2023!
Rohit Lodha
Re: SPDX in GSoC 2023!
J Lovejoy
regular meeting at top of the hour!
J Lovejoy
SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
Richard Fontana
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
Kyle Mitchell
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
J Lovejoy
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
Kyle Mitchell
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
Steve Winslow
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
Max Mehl
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
Kyle Mitchell
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
Ria Schalnat (HPE)
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
J Lovejoy
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
Warner Losh
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
Brian Fox
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
James Bottomley
Re: SPDX should take a stronger stance against vanity/promotional licenses
McCoy Smith
[ANNOUNCE] License and Security Compliance tools users and developers meeting on Feb. 3rd 2023, one day before FOSDEM in Brussels
Philippe Ombredanne
New version of the SPDX Online Tools
Gary O'Neall
joint legal and tech call Thursday, Jan 12th - Change Proposal: ExceptionRef
J Lovejoy
Invitation: SPDX Legal Team - 4th Thursdays 2023 @ Monthly from 12pm to 1pm on the fourth Thursday from Thu Jan 26 to Mon Jan 1, 2024 (EST) (spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org)
Steve Winslow
Invitation: SPDX Legal Team - 2nd Thursdays 2023 @ Monthly from 12pm to 1pm on the second Thursday from Thu Jan 12 to Mon Jan 1, 2024 (EST) (spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org)
Steve Winslow
SPDX License Diff browser extension not producing report
Sebastian Crane
Re: SPDX License Diff browser extension not producing report
Gary O'Neall
SPDX-legal meeting - reviewing and making PRs for licenses
J Lovejoy
Re: Open source licensing discovery
Jonas Smedegaard
Re: Open source licensing discovery
Sihem Ben Sassi
Re: Open source licensing discovery
Sihem Ben Sassi
Re: Open source licensing discovery
Patrice-Emmanuel SCHMITZ via lists.spdx.org
Open source licensing discovery
Sihem Ben Sassi
Change proposal, 2023 meeting schedule, etc.
J Lovejoy
Mismatches between OSI and SPDX
Max Mehl
Re: Mismatches between OSI and SPDX
J Lovejoy
Re: Mismatches between OSI and SPDX
Richard Fontana
Re: Mismatches between OSI and SPDX
Gary O'Neall
Re: Mismatches between OSI and SPDX
J Lovejoy
Re: Mismatches between OSI and SPDX
J Lovejoy
Re: Mismatches between OSI and SPDX
Max Mehl
3.19 License List release
Steve Winslow
Cancelling call for Nov. 24
Steve Winslow
licenses to review for submission
J Lovejoy
Re: licenses to review for submission
J Lovejoy
FYI - planned downtime for tools.spdx.org
Gary O'Neall
Re: FYI - planned downtime for tools.spdx.org
Gary O'Neall
standardizing opt-out of EU data mining rights?
Luis Villa
Re: standardizing opt-out of EU data mining rights?
Richard Fontana
Re: standardizing opt-out of EU data mining rights?
Luis Villa
Re: standardizing opt-out of EU data mining rights?
J Lovejoy
Re: standardizing opt-out of EU data mining rights?
Luis Villa
Re: standardizing opt-out of EU data mining rights?
J Lovejoy
meeting on Thursday
J Lovejoy
FAQs update
J Lovejoy
Unicode
Till Jaeger via lists.spdx.org
Re: Unicode
Nathan Willis
Re: Unicode
Till Jaeger via lists.spdx.org
Re: Unicode
Steve Winslow
Re: Unicode
Luis Villa
Re: Unicode
Gary O'Neall
Re: Unicode
Till Jaeger via lists.spdx.org
Re: Unicode
Steve Winslow
Unicode
Till Jaeger via lists.spdx.org
Question about license matching with SPDX templates
pmonks+spdx
Re: Question about license matching with SPDX templates
Steve Winslow
Re: Question about license matching with SPDX templates
pmonks+spdx
[openchain] Linux Foundation – Building Trust in Software Supply Chains - How OpenChain by the Linux Foundation and other projects enable a trusted supply chain for open source software
Sebastian Crane
call at top of the hour
J Lovejoy
Won't be able to attend the Oct. 27th meeting
Sebastian Crane
Introduction + question about CC0/confidentiality in SPDX 2.2
Haipola, Anna (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Re: Introduction + question about CC0/confidentiality in SPDX 2.2
J Lovejoy
Change Proposal: ExceptionRef-
J Lovejoy
FAQs updates
J Lovejoy
Is the Monkey's Audio license "good"?
Neal Gompa
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Is the Monkey's Audio license "good"?
Neal Gompa
Legal Team call starting shortly
Steve Winslow
Legal Team call starting shortly
Steve Winslow
AI licenses
David Kemp
Re: AI licenses
Kate Stewart
Re: AI licenses
Luis Villa
Re: AI licenses
Kate Stewart
Re: AI licenses
Steve Winslow
Re: AI licenses
J Lovejoy
for discussion: license inclusion guidelines
J Lovejoy
Re: for discussion: license inclusion guidelines
Karsten Klein
Re: for discussion: license inclusion guidelines
Steve Winslow
Re: for discussion: license inclusion guidelines
Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Re: for discussion: license inclusion guidelines
Richard Fontana
Re: for discussion: license inclusion guidelines
J Lovejoy
Re: for discussion: license inclusion guidelines
Russ Allbery
for discussion: when can people start using short ids?
J Lovejoy
Re: for discussion: when can people start using short ids?
Gary O'Neall
Re: for discussion: when can people start using short ids?
Ria Schalnat (HPE)
Re: for discussion: when can people start using short ids?
Steve Winslow
New Change Proposal process
J Lovejoy
updates to license submission tool
J Lovejoy
Re: updates to license submission tool
Richard Fontana
Re: Automatically responding to accepted additions to the SPDX License List
Jim Vitrano
Re: Automatically responding to accepted additions to the SPDX License List
Alexios Zavras
Re: Automatically responding to accepted additions to the SPDX License List
Steve Winslow
Re: Automatically responding to accepted additions to the SPDX License List
Sebastian Crane
Re: Automatically responding to accepted additions to the SPDX License List
J Lovejoy
Matching Guidelines and English grammatical differences
Richard Fontana
Re: Matching Guidelines and English grammatical differences
J Lovejoy
homework prior to call this week
J Lovejoy
public domain dedications proliferation
J Lovejoy
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
Steve Winslow
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
Michael Dolan
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
J Lovejoy
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
Steve Winslow
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
Russ Allbery
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
Sebastian Crane
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
Till Jaeger via lists.spdx.org
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
Richard Purdie
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
J Lovejoy
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
Richard Purdie
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
Warner Losh
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
McCoy Smith
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
Warner Losh
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
McCoy Smith
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
J Lovejoy
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
Sebastian Crane
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
McCoy Smith
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
J Lovejoy
Re: public domain dedications proliferation
McCoy Smith
3.18 License List release
Steve Winslow
the "documentation release" for 3.19
J Lovejoy
prep for 3.18 release
J Lovejoy
[spdx] Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
J Lovejoy
Re: [spdx-tech] Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
Steve Winslow
Re: [spdx-tech] Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Re: [spdx] [spdx-tech] Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
Neal Gompa
legal call at top of the hour
J Lovejoy
[spdx] SPDX Spec Version 2.3 Available for Review
Gary O'Neall
stable spec URLs
J Lovejoy
Re: [spdx-tech] stable spec URLs
Max Mehl
Re: [spdx-tech] stable spec URLs
J Lovejoy
Re: stable spec URLs
J Lovejoy
Commutativity of SPDX expressions
Richard Fontana
Re: Commutativity of SPDX expressions
McCoy Smith
Re: Commutativity of SPDX expressions
Warner Losh
Re: Commutativity of SPDX expressions
J Lovejoy
Re: Commutativity of SPDX expressions
McCoy Smith
Re: Commutativity of SPDX expressions
Warner Losh
Re: Commutativity of SPDX expressions
Richard Fontana
Idea: SPDX-DCO-File-License-Identifier
Richard Fontana
Re: Commutativity of SPDX expressions
J Lovejoy
Re: Commutativity of SPDX expressions
Richard Fontana
Re: Commutativity of SPDX expressions
Gary O'Neall
Re: Commutativity of SPDX expressions
Sebastian Crane
Re: Commutativity of SPDX expressions
Gary O'Neall
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
J Lovejoy
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
McCoy Smith
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
Warner Losh
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
McCoy Smith
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
Warner Losh
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
McCoy Smith
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
Shawn Clark
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
McCoy Smith
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
Warner Losh
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
Steve Winslow
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
Richard Fontana
Re: [spdx] Specific SPDX identifier question I didn't see addressed in the specification
J Lovejoy
Reminder - meeting Friday on License Namespaces policy
Steve Winslow
Joint SPDX Tech / Legal call - namespaces
Gary O'Neall
Fun with licenses
Karsten Klein
Re: Fun with licenses
Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Re: Fun with licenses
Sebastian Crane
No Namespace proposal meeting today?
Sebastian Crane
Re: [spdx-tech] No Namespace proposal meeting today?
Gary O'Neall
No legal team meeting June 23
J Lovejoy
License Identification
David Kemp
Re: License Identification
J Lovejoy
Re: License Identification
David Kemp
Re: License Identification
David Kemp
Minutes and follow-up from today's joint tech/legal call on namespaces
Gary O'Neall
FW: Minutes and follow-up from today's joint tech/legal call on namespaces
Gary O'Neall
Reminder - meeting tomorrow on License Namespaces
Gary O'Neall
Re: [spdx-tech] Reminder - meeting tomorrow on License Namespaces
Dennis Clark
Re: [spdx-tech] Reminder - meeting tomorrow on License Namespaces
Philippe Ombredanne
Re: [spdx-tech] Reminder - meeting tomorrow on License Namespaces
Philippe Ombredanne
Re: Reminder - meeting tomorrow on License Namespaces
Steve Winslow
Re: Reminder - meeting tomorrow on License Namespaces
J Lovejoy
meeting today (in 45')
J Lovejoy
A suggestion to use Relationships for the licence variants use-case
Sebastian Crane
Re: A suggestion to use Relationships for the licence variants use-case
Ria Schalnat (HPE)
Re: A suggestion to use Relationships for the licence variants use-case
Sebastian Crane
Re: A suggestion to use Relationships for the licence variants use-case
Steve Winslow
Re: A suggestion to use Relationships for the licence variants use-case
Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Minutes from joint SPDX Tech Legal call available for review
Gary O'Neall
Follow-up SPDX Joint Tech / Legal Call - SPDX 2.3 requests and issues
Gary O'Neall
Earlier messages
Later messages