Re: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
Hi, guys: Why not consider 2523 i/o 2522 ? In the hardware spec, Cisco 2523 is the same as 2522, all the difference is 2523 is Token-Ring based, In eBay, you could find out that R2523 is cheaper than R2522, For the cost issues, I would suggest the 2523. If the cost/price is not the issues, maybe you could consider 4500/4700M+ with NP-4Ts, 4500/4700 has more horsepower than 2522/2523... Wilson - Original Message - From: Devraj, Prem To: Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:49 PM Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] Hi Larry, I want to connect 8 port for a LAB Scenario which I have. I was thinking of buying a 2522, I was just wondering if anyone has any better ideas then buying this 2522 Thanks prem -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2003 9 9 14:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] You can use the routers back to back with the v.35 cables..CCO has A write-up on back-back frame connections..or buy an 8 port serial Router... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Devraj, Prem Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] Hi All, I am trying to setup a Lab for my CCIE. I do not have a Frame relay switch. And it seems to expensive to buy one. Does anyone have any ideas for a cheaper version of a Frame relay switch. My requirement is atleast 8 ports. A friend of mine told me it is possible to use a ordinary switch (I have tones of them) and use that as a Tunnel for Frame relay encapsulation. Any ideas or suggestions will be welcomed. Thanks prem *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information on a proactive email security service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75170t=75019 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
You can use the routers back to back with the v.35 cables..CCO has A write-up on back-back frame connections..or buy an 8 port serial Router... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Devraj, Prem Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] Hi All, I am trying to setup a Lab for my CCIE. I do not have a Frame relay switch. And it seems to expensive to buy one. Does anyone have any ideas for a cheaper version of a Frame relay switch. My requirement is atleast 8 ports. A friend of mine told me it is possible to use a ordinary switch (I have tones of them) and use that as a Tunnel for Frame relay encapsulation. Any ideas or suggestions will be welcomed. Thanks prem *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75027t=75019 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
Hi Larry, I want to connect 8 port for a LAB Scenario which I have. I was thinking of buying a 2522, I was just wondering if anyone has any better ideas then buying this 2522 Thanks prem -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2003 9 9 14:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] You can use the routers back to back with the v.35 cables..CCO has A write-up on back-back frame connections..or buy an 8 port serial Router... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Devraj, Prem Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] Hi All, I am trying to setup a Lab for my CCIE. I do not have a Frame relay switch. And it seems to expensive to buy one. Does anyone have any ideas for a cheaper version of a Frame relay switch. My requirement is atleast 8 ports. A friend of mine told me it is possible to use a ordinary switch (I have tones of them) and use that as a Tunnel for Frame relay encapsulation. Any ideas or suggestions will be welcomed. Thanks prem *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75045t=75019 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
Hi, guys: Why not consider 2523 i/o 2522 ? In the hardware spec, Cisco 2523 is the same as 2522, all the difference is 2523 is Token-Ring based, In eBay, you could find out that R2523 is cheaper than R2522, For the cost issues, I would suggest the 2523. If the cost/price is not the issues, maybe you could consider 4500/4700M+ with NP-4Ts, 4500/4700 has more horsepower than 2522/2523... Wilson - Original Message - From: Devraj, Prem To: Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:49 PM Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] Hi Larry, I want to connect 8 port for a LAB Scenario which I have. I was thinking of buying a 2522, I was just wondering if anyone has any better ideas then buying this 2522 Thanks prem -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2003 9 9 14:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] You can use the routers back to back with the v.35 cables..CCO has A write-up on back-back frame connections..or buy an 8 port serial Router... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Devraj, Prem Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] Hi All, I am trying to setup a Lab for my CCIE. I do not have a Frame relay switch. And it seems to expensive to buy one. Does anyone have any ideas for a cheaper version of a Frame relay switch. My requirement is atleast 8 ports. A friend of mine told me it is possible to use a ordinary switch (I have tones of them) and use that as a Tunnel for Frame relay encapsulation. Any ideas or suggestions will be welcomed. Thanks prem *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75063t=75019 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
Sure, you could use an older 7000 series router with 8 serial interfaces. You could also use a 2523. there is also a module for 26xx/36xx routers called an NM-8A/S which would also work. However the best solution is a 2522 or 2523. Old 7000 series routers are really big, extremely loud, and use lots of power. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) Devraj, Prem wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Larry, I want to connect 8 port for a LAB Scenario which I have. I was thinking of buying a 2522, I was just wondering if anyone has any better ideas then buying this 2522 Thanks prem -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2003 9 9 14:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] You can use the routers back to back with the v.35 cables..CCO has A write-up on back-back frame connections..or buy an 8 port serial Router... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Devraj, Prem Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] Hi All, I am trying to setup a Lab for my CCIE. I do not have a Frame relay switch. And it seems to expensive to buy one. Does anyone have any ideas for a cheaper version of a Frame relay switch. My requirement is atleast 8 ports. A friend of mine told me it is possible to use a ordinary switch (I have tones of them) and use that as a Tunnel for Frame relay encapsulation. Any ideas or suggestions will be welcomed. Thanks prem *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75054t=75019 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
If you want to do more than j/a frame switch, than a 7000 would be ideal. Fast ethernet, atm, and frame-relay switch all in one. - Original Message - From: Devraj, Prem To: Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:49 AM Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] Hi Larry, I want to connect 8 port for a LAB Scenario which I have. I was thinking of buying a 2522, I was just wondering if anyone has any better ideas then buying this 2522 Thanks prem -Original Message- From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2003 9 9 14:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] You can use the routers back to back with the v.35 cables..CCO has A write-up on back-back frame connections..or buy an 8 port serial Router... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Devraj, Prem Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019] Hi All, I am trying to setup a Lab for my CCIE. I do not have a Frame relay switch. And it seems to expensive to buy one. Does anyone have any ideas for a cheaper version of a Frame relay switch. My requirement is atleast 8 ports. A friend of mine told me it is possible to use a ordinary switch (I have tones of them) and use that as a Tunnel for Frame relay encapsulation. Any ideas or suggestions will be welcomed. Thanks prem *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75097t=75019 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
I share my idea with you blow: Please application 2 ISDN lines and buy 2 ISDN modems, in china, you only need to pay RMB 50 per month for the lines, so cheap. Good luck! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75139t=75019 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
Hi All, I am trying to setup a Lab for my CCIE. I do not have a Frame relay switch. And it seems to expensive to buy one. Does anyone have any ideas for a cheaper version of a Frame relay switch. My requirement is atleast 8 ports. A friend of mine told me it is possible to use a ordinary switch (I have tones of them) and use that as a Tunnel for Frame relay encapsulation. Any ideas or suggestions will be welcomed. Thanks prem *** Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is the marketing name used globally to represent the investment banking activities of Dresdner Bank Group. In Japan, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein is represented by Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (Japan) Limited, Tokyo Branch or Dresdner Bank AG, Tokyo Branch. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75019t=75019 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
You can get a 2522 with 10 port serial for around $500. Raj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75022t=75019 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Issue Redistributing Connected Frame Relay Subint [7:74904]
Redistributing is not working for Frame Relay subinterfaces. R1 inter loo 0 ip ad 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.255 ! inter eth 0 ip ad 172.16.13.9 255.255.255.252 int ser 0.1 point-to-point ip ad 192.168.12.5 255.255.255.252 frame-relay interface-dlci 112 ! router ospf 1 netw 172.16.13.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 redistribute connected subnets metric 10 Network 192.168.12.4 does not appear on R2's routing table. Any Thoughts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74904t=74904 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Frame Relay Back To Back Static PVC [7:72869]
Thanks Alex but when your routers are going back to back LMIs are turned off with the no keepalive command. I believe because a Frame switch is not involved in creating the PVC. In any case I updated the IOS image to 12.3.1a on both routers and the connection comes back up without any issues even after being unplugged and reconnected. Degracia, Alex wrote: Make sure lmi is being exchanged. Turn on keepalives for the pvc. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame Relay Back To Back Static PVC [7:72869] Per these instructions, I am able to bring my frame connection online: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/frbacktoback.html However when I intentionally break the connection (Pull the Cable)the PVC doesn't automatically come back up. Is it because its static to begin with? I know I'm probably missing something very obvious but could you explain why the interface does not come back online after being reconnected? So far, the only way I can get the connection back online is by using a hard/software configured loopback and removing it at which point I'm up, up. Thanks. BTW Using IOS versions 12.1(20) and 11.2(26)P4. Configs are identical to the instructions. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73505t=72869 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Frame Relay Design Consideration (P2P or P2Mul [7:73431]
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: When you consider interface buffers are allocated to each subinterface Which command displays information about the buffers allocated to the subinterfaces? XXX#sh ip int br | inc Serial Serial4/0 unassigned YES manual up up Serial4/0.3172.168.1.1 YES manual up up Serial4/0.4172.168.1.5 YES manual up up Serial4/1 unassigned YES manual administratively down down Serial4/2 unassigned YES manual administratively down down Serial4/3 unassigned YES manual administratively down down XXX#sh buffer | inc Serial Serial4/0 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): Serial4/1 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): Serial4/2 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): Serial4/3 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): XXX# Thanks, Zsombor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73432t=73431 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Frame Relay Design Consideration (P2P or P2Mul [7:73431]
At 6:24 AM + 8/3/03, Zsombor Papp wrote: Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: When you consider interface buffers are allocated to each subinterface Which command displays information about the buffers allocated to the subinterfaces? Zsombor, interesting observation. I will have to check it; there may have been an IOS change. I _know_ I've run out of buffers on 2500s under IOS 11x by assigning too many p2p subinterfaces. If the IOS has changed to buffer on a physical interface basis only, that may bring up different performance issues as a large number of subinterfaces contend for a limited number of buffers. XXX#sh ip int br | inc Serial Serial4/0 unassigned YES manual up up Serial4/0.3172.168.1.1 YES manual up up Serial4/0.4172.168.1.5 YES manual up up Serial4/1 unassigned YES manual administratively down down Serial4/2 unassigned YES manual administratively down down Serial4/3 unassigned YES manual administratively down down XXX#sh buffer | inc Serial Serial4/0 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): Serial4/1 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): Serial4/2 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): Serial4/3 buffers, 512 bytes (total 96, permanent 96): XXX# I also remember the buffers in question to be 10 per subinterface, and around 1600 bytes. I wonder if we are thinking of two different pools? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73451t=73431 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Frame Relay Design Consideration (P2P or P2Multipoint) [7:73410]
Guys, Very quick one here. If I have a hub site with 5 spoke sites on an FR network, I could use FR P2P sub ints or P2M sub ints. Why would I prefer a P2P over P2M method? The routing protocol would be EIGRP and apart from broadcast traffic being 5 times more than a P2P network, why would it be better for a P2P. I mean the split horizon can be turned off on the hub multipoint interface. Sorry if this sounds like dumb question? Many thx Ken For more information about Barclays Capital, please visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73410t=73410 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Frame Relay Design Consideration (P2P or P2Multipoint) [7:73415]
Less IP addresses used? wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Guys, Very quick one here. If I have a hub site with 5 spoke sites on an FR network, I could use FR P2P sub ints or P2M sub ints. Why would I prefer a P2P over P2M method? The routing protocol would be EIGRP and apart from broadcast traffic being 5 times more than a P2P network, why would it be better for a P2P. I mean the split horizon can be turned off on the hub multipoint interface. Sorry if this sounds like dumb question? Many thx Ken For more information about Barclays Capital, please visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73415t=73415 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Frame Relay Design Consideration (P2P or P2Multipoint) [7:73416]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Guys, Very quick one here. If I have a hub site with 5 spoke sites on an FR network, I could use FR P2P sub ints or P2M sub ints. Why would I prefer a P2P over P2M method? The routing protocol would be EIGRP and apart from broadcast traffic being 5 times more than a P2P network, why would it be better for a P2P. I mean the split horizon can be turned off on the hub multipoint interface. this is a fascinating question to me. I wonder if the real reason different people prefer different approaches is more a personality thing than a real design thing. I prefer P2P subinterfaces, because at heart I think in terms of a wire that goes from here to there. I ususally do numbering schemes that have an internal logic to them and P2P is easier for me to deal with in terms of this logic. you are correct that split horizon can be turned off. You can make adjustments within any routing protocol execpt maybe for IS-IS either way. I guess in my case, I like things to be simple, and the more configuration I have to do, the more subtleties I have to worry about, the less I like it because it starts becoming work ;- I'd be curious what some other folks who do a lot of network installation think. Over the past few years I've sold quite a few smaller networks, all hub and spoke, and mostly frame relay types ( although lately that has changed to more RLAN - ATM to DSL ) In every case I have done things the subinterface way because I personally believe it is easier to document and easier to troubleshoot. But that's just me. Sorry if this sounds like dumb question? Many thx Ken For more information about Barclays Capital, please visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com. Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays Group for operational or business reasons. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73416t=73416 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Frame Relay Design Consideration (P2P or P2Multipoint) [7:73417]
At 3:35 PM + 8/2/03, Charles Cthulhu Riley wrote: Less IP addresses used? Typically, the advantage of P2P is that you can impose individual policies on each spoke. A basic such example would be bandwidth matching the CIR if all CIR's are not the same. Spoke-specific access lists would be another. Routing configuration generally is easier. You also get finer granularity for SNMP, accounting, etc. P2M might slightly conserve IP addresses, but, more significantly, it conserves Interface Descriptor Blocks (IDB) and interface buffers in the IOS. In some respects, it's more intuitive, although the routing configuration is more complex. wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Guys, Very quick one here. If I have a hub site with 5 spoke sites on an FR network, I could use FR P2P sub ints or P2M sub ints. Why would I prefer a P2P over P2M method? The routing protocol would be EIGRP and apart from broadcast traffic being 5 times more than a P2P network, why would it be better for a P2P. I mean the split horizon can be turned off on the hub multipoint interface. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73417t=73417 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Frame Relay Design Consideration (P2P or P2Multipoint) [7:73429]
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] At 3:35 PM + 8/2/03, Charles Cthulhu Riley wrote: Less IP addresses used? Typically, the advantage of P2P is that you can impose individual policies on each spoke. A basic such example would be bandwidth matching the CIR if all CIR's are not the same. Spoke-specific access lists would be another. Routing configuration generally is easier. You also get finer granularity for SNMP, accounting, etc. P2M might slightly conserve IP addresses, but, more significantly, it conserves Interface Descriptor Blocks (IDB) and interface buffers in the IOS. In some respects, it's more intuitive, although the routing configuration is more complex. This was probably an important issue several IOS versions ago. These days, with limits in the thousands ( maybe up to 10,000? ) descriptor blocks available, even on the lowly 2501, this is no longer an issue. As I once said in another lifetime, changes in hardware and software have led to less concern with traditional design issues that were centered around scarce resources. If I can trust the Cisco writings on the topic, trhe more modern QoS mechanisms have even led to more effective use of WAN bandwidth, which has continued to be the real bottleneck in networking. Tools such as RED, WRED, and tail drop have helped alleviate the problems associated with the phenomenon of global synchronization. I suspect the work of the IETF and queueing theory researchers over the past decade of so have led to a more effective use of bandwidth, meaning that more data can use the same link. If I understand correctly. wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Guys, Very quick one here. If I have a hub site with 5 spoke sites on an FR network, I could use FR P2P sub ints or P2M sub ints. Why would I prefer a P2P over P2M method? The routing protocol would be EIGRP and apart from broadcast traffic being 5 times more than a P2P network, why would it be better for a P2P. I mean the split horizon can be turned off on the hub multipoint interface. **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73429t=73429 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Frame Relay Design Consideration (P2P or P2Multipoint) [7:73431]
At 1:40 AM + 8/3/03, Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter wrote: Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] At 3:35 PM + 8/2/03, Charles Cthulhu Riley wrote: Less IP addresses used? Typically, the advantage of P2P is that you can impose individual policies on each spoke. A basic such example would be bandwidth matching the CIR if all CIR's are not the same. Spoke-specific access lists would be another. Routing configuration generally is easier. You also get finer granularity for SNMP, accounting, etc. P2M might slightly conserve IP addresses, but, more significantly, it conserves Interface Descriptor Blocks (IDB) and interface buffers in the IOS. In some respects, it's more intuitive, although the routing configuration is more complex. This was probably an important issue several IOS versions ago. These days, with limits in the thousands ( maybe up to 10,000? ) descriptor blocks available, even on the lowly 2501, this is no longer an issue. As I once said in another lifetime, changes in hardware and software have led to less concern with traditional design issues that were centered around scarce resources. Agreed that the IDB limit is not the issue with appropriate releases. When you consider interface buffers are allocated to each subinterface, however, that's a different memory impact on a small router. Admittedly, that isn't as major with the newer platforms. On a 2501 with 2MB shared RAM (where the buffers go), it's major. If I can trust the Cisco writings on the topic, trhe more modern QoS mechanisms have even led to more effective use of WAN bandwidth, which has continued to be the real bottleneck in networking. That bottleneck, as you know, isn't necessarily absolute bandwidth, but queueing delay in access to bandwidth by latency-sensitive applications. Tools such as RED, WRED, and tail drop have helped alleviate the problems associated with the phenomenon of global synchronization. I suspect the work of the IETF and queueing theory researchers over the past decade of so have led to a more effective use of bandwidth, meaning that more data can use the same link. If I understand correctly. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73431t=73431 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Frame Relay Back To Back Static PVC [7:72869]
Per these instructions, I am able to bring my frame connection online: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/frbacktoback.html However when I intentionally break the connection (Pull the Cable) the PVC doesn't automatically come back up. Is it because its static to begin with? I know I'm probably missing something very obvious but could you explain why the interface does not come back online after being reconnected? So far, the only way I can get the connection back online is by using a hard/software configured loopback and removing it at which point I'm up, up. Thanks. BTW Using IOS versions 12.1(20) and 11.2(26)P4. Configs are identical to the instructions. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72869t=72869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame Relay Back To Back Static PVC [7:72869]
Make sure lmi is being exchanged. Turn on keepalives for the pvc. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame Relay Back To Back Static PVC [7:72869] Per these instructions, I am able to bring my frame connection online: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/frbacktoback.html However when I intentionally break the connection (Pull the Cable) the PVC doesn't automatically come back up. Is it because its static to begin with? I know I'm probably missing something very obvious but could you explain why the interface does not come back online after being reconnected? So far, the only way I can get the connection back online is by using a hard/software configured loopback and removing it at which point I'm up, up. Thanks. BTW Using IOS versions 12.1(20) and 11.2(26)P4. Configs are identical to the instructions. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72872t=72869 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
need input on a frame relay t1 problem [7:72621]
I've got a frame line thats almost 100% errors, mostly framing. Local Hardware is a 1604 w/ t1 wic (for testing purposes only. will be a 3640.) Remote hardware for the 6 pvc's are 1604's w/ t1 wics on fractional frame lines. Remotes have existing pvcs back to the 3640 on the production network. PVCs come up but line protocol bounces continuously. telco has reported that they can get to their network termination but not to my csu. I've triple checked the extension from the NIU to the WIC and it looks good. Its about 75 feet of shielded t1 cable. Tried both clock source line and clock source internal. on clock source line I lose the pvcs (deleted). Telco verified lmi type cisco (they had it at auto but changed to cisco). I tried ANSI on my side and got no LMI rcvs. W/ type set to cisco LMI enq/rcv is incrementing but drifting all over the place. Interface resets increment each time I lose line protocol. Carrier resets are incrementing slowly as well. Im still suspecting telco issues but any input would be greatly appreciated. interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay fair-queue 64 32 0 service-module t1 clock source internal service-module t1 timeslots all frame-relay lmi-type cisco local-test#sho int s0 Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC Serial (with FT1 CSU/DSU WIC) MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 189/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 18, LMI stat recvd 11, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 76/0, interface broadcasts 66 Last input 00:00:08, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:03:06 Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/1/32 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec 19 packets input, 1466 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 11 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 1154 input errors, 89 CRC, 737 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 328 abort 99 packets output, 8280 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 3 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up local-test# local-test# local-test# local-test# local-test#sho frame lmi LMI Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) LMI TYPE = CISCO Invalid Unnumbered info 0Invalid Prot Disc 0 Invalid dummy Call Ref 0Invalid Msg Type 0 Invalid Status Message 0Invalid Lock Shift 0 Invalid Information ID 0Invalid Report IE Len 0 Invalid Report Request 0Invalid Keep IE Len 0 Num Status Enq. Sent 19Num Status msgs Rcvd 12 Num Update Status Rcvd 0Num Status Timeouts 8 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72621t=72621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: need input on a frame relay t1 problem [7:72621]
Wilmes, Rusty wrote: I've got a frame line thats almost 100% errors, mostly framing. Local Hardware is a 1604 w/ t1 wic (for testing purposes only. will be a 3640.) Remote hardware for the 6 pvc's are 1604's w/ t1 wics on fractional frame lines. Remotes have existing pvcs back to the 3640 on the production network. PVCs come up but line protocol bounces continuously. telco has reported that they can get to their network termination but not to my csu. I've triple checked the extension from the NIU to the WIC and it looks good. Its about 75 feet of shielded t1 cable. Tried both clock source line and clock source internal. on clock source line I lose the pvcs (deleted). Telco verified lmi type cisco (they had it at auto but changed to cisco). I tried ANSI on my side and got no LMI rcvs. W/ type set to cisco LMI enq/rcv is incrementing but drifting all over the place. Interface resets increment each time I lose line protocol. Carrier resets are incrementing slowly as well. Im still suspecting telco issues but any input would be greatly appreciated. interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay fair-queue 64 32 0 service-module t1 clock source internal service-module t1 timeslots all frame-relay lmi-type cisco local-test#sho int s0 Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC Serial (with FT1 CSU/DSU WIC) MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 189/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 18, LMI stat recvd 11, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 76/0, interface broadcasts 66 Last input 00:00:08, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:03:06 Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/1/32 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec 19 packets input, 1466 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 11 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 1154 input errors, 89 CRC, 737 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 328 abort 99 packets output, 8280 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 3 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up local-test# local-test# local-test# local-test# local-test#sho frame lmi LMI Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) LMI TYPE = CISCO Invalid Unnumbered info 0Invalid Prot Disc 0 Invalid dummy Call Ref 0Invalid Msg Type 0 Invalid Status Message 0Invalid Lock Shift 0 Invalid Information ID 0Invalid Report IE Len 0 Invalid Report Request 0Invalid Keep IE Len 0 Num Status Enq. Sent 19Num Status msgs Rcvd 12 Num Update Status Rcvd 0Num Status Timeouts 8 Without actually being there, it sounds like a clocking problem to me. 0. I'm surprised that you are using internal clocking. Getting clock from the telco is usually much more reliable than your DSU. Are they supposed to be providing clock? 1. Have you run any loopback tests on the interface? If the problem continues with the interface looped, it is likely to be a router or WIC-1T problem. 2. Do you have any spare hardware for swapping? - swap the 75 foot cable - swap the WIC-1T - try direct serial-serial connection to another test router 3. Take a look at some debug output, such as debug serial interface and debug frame-relay HTH Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72625t=72621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need input on a frame relay t1 problem [7:72621]
Thanks to all. We've isolated it to the house cabling extension. If i jack the router directly to the niu the line comes up and runs error free. Crud, I hate it when its not verizons fault :) Thanks again, Rusty -Original Message- From: Wilmes, Rusty Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: need input on a frame relay t1 problem [7:72621] I've got a frame line thats almost 100% errors, mostly framing. Local Hardware is a 1604 w/ t1 wic (for testing purposes only. will be a 3640.) Remote hardware for the 6 pvc's are 1604's w/ t1 wics on fractional frame lines. Remotes have existing pvcs back to the 3640 on the production network. PVCs come up but line protocol bounces continuously. telco has reported that they can get to their network termination but not to my csu. I've triple checked the extension from the NIU to the WIC and it looks good. Its about 75 feet of shielded t1 cable. Tried both clock source line and clock source internal. on clock source line I lose the pvcs (deleted). Telco verified lmi type cisco (they had it at auto but changed to cisco). I tried ANSI on my side and got no LMI rcvs. W/ type set to cisco LMI enq/rcv is incrementing but drifting all over the place. Interface resets increment each time I lose line protocol. Carrier resets are incrementing slowly as well. Im still suspecting telco issues but any input would be greatly appreciated. interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay fair-queue 64 32 0 service-module t1 clock source internal service-module t1 timeslots all frame-relay lmi-type cisco local-test#sho int s0 Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is QUICC Serial (with FT1 CSU/DSU WIC) MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 189/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 18, LMI stat recvd 11, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 76/0, interface broadcasts 66 Last input 00:00:08, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:03:06 Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/1/32 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec 19 packets input, 1466 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 11 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 1154 input errors, 89 CRC, 737 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 328 abort 99 packets output, 8280 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 3 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up local-test# local-test# local-test# local-test# local-test#sho frame lmi LMI Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) LMI TYPE = CISCO Invalid Unnumbered info 0Invalid Prot Disc 0 Invalid dummy Call Ref 0Invalid Msg Type 0 Invalid Status Message 0Invalid Lock Shift 0 Invalid Information ID 0Invalid Report IE Len 0 Invalid Report Request 0Invalid Keep IE Len 0 Num Status Enq. Sent 19Num Status msgs Rcvd 12 Num Update Status Rcvd 0Num Status Timeouts 8 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72627t=72621 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-relay HSRP [7:72166]
I have seen this problem before with frame. LMI being local to the frame switch means the interface does not go down and backups routes do not kick in. One way to overcome this is to monitor layer 2 by using the #8220;frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode bidirectional#8221; command within a map class on both sides. This command sends a keepalive every 15 seconds, if 3 are missed the interface will change to down/down even though the interface is receiving LMI from the frame switch. I hope this helps. Mike Masaru Umetsu wrote: Dear all I have a question about frame-relay. Network Diagram is below. R1* * *R3 | * FR * | R2* * *R4 I configured a HSRP between R1 and R2, R3 and R4. R1,R3 are Active router.(R2,R4 are Standby router) And I configured standby track in a Wan side of R1,R3. When I disabled(shutdown the interface) the serial0/0 of R1 , then R2 became Active router. It's ok. But R3 didn't detect a down of Wan side,so serial0/0 of R3 is up-up. Therefore,I can't send a data between R2 and R4. Regarding Frame-relay configuration, I configured frame-relay in main-interface. Is it a mechanism of Frame-relay in main-interface ? I don't know in detail. Should I use sub-interface point-2-point definition in frame-relay to use HSRP standby track ? Please explain me about this problem. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72214t=72166 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-relay HSRP [7:72166]
Ahh yes.. you can do this also.. pending you have 12.0(5)T or later. The only issue with that is you might want to modify the frame-relay end-to-end keepalive timer As you stated, Within the 15 second intervals x3 you are looking at a good 45 seconds before the WAN interface goes down down ,plus another 10 for the HSRP holdtimer. mccloud mike wrote: I have seen this problem before with frame. LMI being local to the frame switch means the interface does not go down and backups routes do not kick in. One way to overcome this is to monitor layer 2 by using the #8220;frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode bidirectional#8221; command within a map class on both sides. This command sends a keepalive every 15 seconds, if 3 are missed the interface will change to down/down even though the interface is receiving LMI from the frame switch. I hope this helps. Mike Masaru Umetsu wrote: Dear all I have a question about frame-relay. Network Diagram is below. R1* * *R3 | * FR * | R2* * *R4 I configured a HSRP between R1 and R2, R3 and R4. R1,R3 are Active router.(R2,R4 are Standby router) And I configured standby track in a Wan side of R1,R3. When I disabled(shutdown the interface) the serial0/0 of R1 , then R2 became Active router. It's ok. But R3 didn't detect a down of Wan side,so serial0/0 of R3 is up-up. Therefore,I can't send a data between R2 and R4. Regarding Frame-relay configuration, I configured frame-relay in main-interface. Is it a mechanism of Frame-relay in main-interface ? I don't know in detail. Should I use sub-interface point-2-point definition in frame-relay to use HSRP standby track ? Please explain me about this problem. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72218t=72166 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: Frame-relay HSRP [7:72166]
Thanks Salvatore. As a resolution, is it only to change the configuration from main-interface to sub-interface p2p$B!)(B If it is only sub-interface p2p, when and how should I use main-interface frame-relay configuration ? Don't you usually use main-interface frame-relay configuration ? Is there any solution by using current(main-interface) configuration to resolve my problem ? If there's something good to see, please let me know the URL or book. Thanks. On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 02:58:51 GMT Salvatore De Luca wrote: nobody When you have a FR connection, you have a dedicated circuit to your provider nobody which then on taps into the frame cloud. So consider it alomost like a nobody point-to-point link to your local Carrier and then from there you connect nobody within the providers Frame Switch into their Frame Relay cloud. Now, when nobody you shutdown R1's Wan interface your HSRP failed over fine. The reason that nobody R3 was showing Up Up was that your circuit to your carrier from R3 did not nobody go down and it stil exhanges LMI with R3's Physical interface, your PVC nobody should have been showing INACTIVE at this point though. I would recommend nobody using point-to-point subinterfaces on your FR WAN connections. When you do nobody this and then shut down one end of the link the line protocol on the nobody sub-interface of R3 would go UP DOWN and if you then track the nobody SUB-Interface, you should have a successful failover for the Standby Track nobody command on R3. Currently, you have outboud traffic going out R2 ---R4 and nobody return traffic going to the Active HSRP router R3 then dropping packets nobody because your PVC is INACTIVE and you are in an UP UP state.. nobody nobody You have successfully achieved Asymetrical routing.. :( nobody nobody Until your Interface Line protocol Drops in an UP DOWN state on R3's WAN nobody interface.. then Standby Interface tracking wont do anything.. nobody nobody nobody Masaru Umetsu wrote: nobody nobody Dear all nobody nobody I have a question about frame-relay. Network Diagram is below. nobody nobody R1* * *R3 nobody | * FR * | nobody R2* * *R4 nobody nobody I configured a HSRP between R1 and R2, R3 and R4. nobody R1,R3 are Active router.(R2,R4 are Standby router) nobody And I configured standby track in a Wan side of R1,R3. nobody nobody When I disabled(shutdown the interface) the serial0/0 of R1 , nobody then R2 became Active router. It's ok. nobody But R3 didn't detect a down of Wan side,so serial0/0 of R3 is nobody up-up. nobody Therefore,I can't send a data between R2 and R4. nobody Regarding Frame-relay configuration, I configured frame-relay in nobody main-interface. Is it a mechanism of Frame-relay in nobody main-interface ? nobody I don't know in detail. Should I use sub-interface nobody point-2-point nobody definition in frame-relay to use HSRP standby track ? Please nobody explain me nobody about this problem. nobody nobody nobody nobody nobody nobody Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72171t=72166 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re[2]: Frame-relay HSRP [7:72166]
Masaru, The main importance of the physical main interface configuration in frame-relay is to set your encapsulation and or/LMI-Type if you use ANSI or Q.933a, the default of CISCO is already set for you, and you do not need to manually configure it either unless you have disabled inverse-arp. The scenario I gave you resolves your issue with HSRP and the UP UP situation for standby tracking. You want to generate a UP Down situation so you have a true failover, which your current configuration cannot provide.. at least I am not aware of another way. The advantage to sub-interfaces which include scalability, dlci prioritization, and your little HSRP problem are just a few the the added values of doing it.. You will always need the Physical Interface configuration for Layer 2 capabilities, but the layer 3 can be done on a sub-interface level where you will also specify your local dlci information. In your setup you would want to use point-to-point links since your not in a Hub-and-Spoke or Full-Mesh design, where you need multipoint connections.If you use a subinterface.. and your link to R1 goes down, you will generate an UP DOWN on R3's subinterface where if you track that subinterface in HSRP, it will fail over to R4. Here is a URL that may help anything I missed.. the Cisco DOC CD is a valuable source of information on this kind of stuff.. You may also want to thoroughly read through Chapter 4 of Caslow/Pavlichenko's:Bridges, routers, and Switches for CCIE's. They explain the different uses of Frame-relay pretty well. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/wan_c/wcdfrely.htm#31757 All the Best! Sal Masaru Umetsu wrote: Thanks Salvatore. As a resolution, is it only to change the configuration from main-interface to sub-interface p2p$B!)(B If it is only sub-interface p2p, when and how should I use main-interface frame-relay configuration ? Don't you usually use main-interface frame-relay configuration ? Is there any solution by using current(main-interface) configuration to resolve my problem ? If there's something good to see, please let me know the URL or book. Thanks. On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 02:58:51 GMT Salvatore De Luca wrote: nobody When you have a FR connection, you have a dedicated circuit to your provider nobody which then on taps into the frame cloud. So consider it alomost like a nobody point-to-point link to your local Carrier and then from there you connect nobody within the providers Frame Switch into their Frame Relay cloud. Now, when nobody you shutdown R1's Wan interface your HSRP failed over fine. The reason that nobody R3 was showing Up Up was that your circuit to your carrier from R3 did not nobody go down and it stil exhanges LMI with R3's Physical interface, your PVC nobody should have been showing INACTIVE at this point though. I would recommend nobody using point-to-point subinterfaces on your FR WAN connections. When you do nobody this and then shut down one end of the link the line protocol on the nobody sub-interface of R3 would go UP DOWN and if you then track the nobody SUB-Interface, you should have a successful failover for the Standby Track nobody command on R3. Currently, you have outboud traffic going out R2 ---R4 and nobody return traffic going to the Active HSRP router R3 then dropping packets nobody because your PVC is INACTIVE and you are in an UP UP state.. nobody nobody You have successfully achieved Asymetrical routing.. :( nobody nobody Until your Interface Line protocol Drops in an UP DOWN state on R3's WAN nobody interface.. then Standby Interface tracking wont do anything.. nobody nobody nobody Masaru Umetsu wrote: nobody nobody Dear all nobody nobody I have a question about frame-relay. Network Diagram is below. nobody nobody R1* * *R3 nobody | * FR * | nobody R2* * *R4 nobody nobody I configured a HSRP between R1 and R2, R3 and R4. nobody R1,R3 are Active router.(R2,R4 are Standby router) nobody And I configured standby track in a Wan side of R1,R3. nobody nobody When I disabled(shutdown the interface) the serial0/0 of R1 , nobody then R2 became Active router. It's ok. nobody But R3 didn't detect a down of Wan side,so serial0/0 of R3 is nobody up-up. nobody Therefore,I can't send a data between R2 and R4. nobody Regarding Frame-relay configuration, I configured frame-relay in nobody main-interface. Is it a mechanism of Frame-relay in nobody main-interface ? nobody I don't know in detail. Should I use sub-interface nobody point-2-point nobody definition in frame-relay to use HSRP standby track ? Please nobody explain me nobody about this problem. nobody nobody nobody nobody nobody nobody Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72183t=72166 -- FAQ, list archives
Frame-relay HSRP [7:72166]
Dear all I have a question about frame-relay. Network Diagram is below. R1* * *R3 | * FR * | R2* * *R4 I configured a HSRP between R1 and R2, R3 and R4. R1,R3 are Active router.(R2,R4 are Standby router) And I configured standby track in a Wan side of R1,R3. When I disabled(shutdown the interface) the serial0/0 of R1 , then R2 became Active router. It's ok. But R3 didn't detect a down of Wan side,so serial0/0 of R3 is up-up. Therefore,I can't send a data between R2 and R4. Regarding Frame-relay configuration, I configured frame-relay in main-interface. Is it a mechanism of Frame-relay in main-interface ? I don't know in detail. Should I use sub-interface point-2-point definition in frame-relay to use HSRP standby track ? Please explain me about this problem. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72166t=72166 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-relay HSRP [7:72166]
When you have a FR connection, you have a dedicated circuit to your provider which then on taps into the frame cloud. So consider it alomost like a point-to-point link to your local Carrier and then from there you connect within the providers Frame Switch into their Frame Relay cloud. Now, when you shutdown R1's Wan interface your HSRP failed over fine. The reason that R3 was showing Up Up was that your circuit to your carrier from R3 did not go down and it stil exhanges LMI with R3's Physical interface, your PVC should have been showing INACTIVE at this point though. I would recommend using point-to-point subinterfaces on your FR WAN connections. When you do this and then shut down one end of the link the line protocol on the sub-interface of R3 would go UP DOWN and if you then track the SUB-Interface, you should have a successful failover for the Standby Track command on R3. Currently, you have outboud traffic going out R2 ---R4 and return traffic going to the Active HSRP router R3 then dropping packets because your PVC is INACTIVE and you are in an UP UP state.. You have successfully achieved Asymetrical routing.. :( Until your Interface Line protocol Drops in an UP DOWN state on R3's WAN interface.. then Standby Interface tracking wont do anything.. Masaru Umetsu wrote: Dear all I have a question about frame-relay. Network Diagram is below. R1* * *R3 | * FR * | R2* * *R4 I configured a HSRP between R1 and R2, R3 and R4. R1,R3 are Active router.(R2,R4 are Standby router) And I configured standby track in a Wan side of R1,R3. When I disabled(shutdown the interface) the serial0/0 of R1 , then R2 became Active router. It's ok. But R3 didn't detect a down of Wan side,so serial0/0 of R3 is up-up. Therefore,I can't send a data between R2 and R4. Regarding Frame-relay configuration, I configured frame-relay in main-interface. Is it a mechanism of Frame-relay in main-interface ? I don't know in detail. Should I use sub-interface point-2-point definition in frame-relay to use HSRP standby track ? Please explain me about this problem. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72168t=72166 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco frame-relay question [7:71500]
I think frame-relay local-dlci is used for specifying which PVC should be used on a interface, or in other word tie a interface to a PVC, especially when using sub-interface. When using physical interface, you may use frame-relay map command or inverse-arp in case you have only one PVC for that interface MNThC nh Support Division Vietnam Datacommunication Company (VDC) Wilmes, Rusty wrote: It looks like it's used when LMI isn't available http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5187/products_command_refe rence_chapter09186a008017cf53.html#1059567 Note The frame-relay local-dlci command is provided mainly to allow testing of the Frame Relay encapsulation in a setting where two servers are connected back-to-back. This command is not required in a live Frame Relay network. -Original Message- From: Paresh Khatri To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 6/26/2003 8:26 PM Subject: Cisco frame-relay question [7:71500] Hi all, What is the cisco frame-relay local-dlci command used for ? Thanks in advance, Paresh. -- MNThanh Support Division, VDC1 292 Tay Son, Hanoi, Vietnam Telephone: +84-4-5374165 Fax: +84-4-5372781 Handphone: +84-91-3213801 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71617t=71500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco frame-relay question [7:71500]
This command is used to to set the source DLCI for use when LMI is not supported. This command is mainly used for testing of frame-relay encapsulation when two servers are connected back to back. Thanks Azhar Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71591t=71500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco frame-relay question [7:71500]
It looks like it's used when LMI isn't available http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5187/products_command_refe rence_chapter09186a008017cf53.html#1059567 Note The frame-relay local-dlci command is provided mainly to allow testing of the Frame Relay encapsulation in a setting where two servers are connected back-to-back. This command is not required in a live Frame Relay network. -Original Message- From: Paresh Khatri To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 6/26/2003 8:26 PM Subject: Cisco frame-relay question [7:71500] Hi all, What is the cisco frame-relay local-dlci command used for ? Thanks in advance, Paresh. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71527t=71500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco frame-relay question [7:71500]
Hi all, What is the cisco frame-relay local-dlci command used for ? Thanks in advance, Paresh. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71500t=71500 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame Relay over IP [7:70927]
I am tryin to use Frame relay switching over IP. Not IP over frame relay. If we can do that we can connect two sites that are connected over IP from L2 point of view. Frame Relay Frame Relay over IP is not yet readily available. The draft IETF specification was produced in March 2001. This has not left much time for industry take-up. Frame Relay over IP would probably appeal only to the carrier market in any case. Carriers may embrace this to reduce their frame relay network costs. It is unlikely to find widespread deployment at all, although it may see limited use towards the end of this year. It should hold little attraction for enterprise companies- where is the benefit of adding another layer of complexity when they can engineer and migrate to an IP VPN instead? Best regards, Pedro Cabarga wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] May I ask you what r u tryng to do? Cisco Breaker wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, Anybody used Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE Tunnel with Cisco routers? We are searching for a solution to deploy Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE tunnel. Any help will be appreciated. Best regards, Cisco Breaker Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70955t=70927 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay over IP [7:70927]
Hi all, Anybody used Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE Tunnel with Cisco routers? We are searching for a solution to deploy Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE tunnel. Any help will be appreciated. Best regards, Cisco Breaker Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70927t=70927 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame Relay over IP [7:70927]
May I ask you what r u tryng to do? Cisco Breaker wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, Anybody used Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE Tunnel with Cisco routers? We are searching for a solution to deploy Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE tunnel. Any help will be appreciated. Best regards, Cisco Breaker Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70933t=70927 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame-relay on a coffee break... [7:66509]
Would be nice to hear if anyone has encountered similars problem and has any ideas how to get past some of the sometimes animal behaviour of frame-relay. Setting up a frame-relay cloud; Router A needs to connect to Router B, DLCIs are given. Disable inverse-arp and install frame-relay map statements and vice versa. Router A tries to ping to Router B, nothing, dead. Had a quick look at the DLCI’s coming into the interface - sure enough, the DLCI number is there, both sides see their respective DLCI‘s. So I enable inverse-arp and take out the map statements. Ping Router B and yes it sees it, so the link and cables are fine. Clear inarp cache and install map statements, disable inarp. Nothing… Double check the frame switch, looks ok. Disable inarp and reboot the Router. Install map statements, ping Router B, nothing. Ping again, nothing, wait, nothing. Go have a cup of coffee, come back 20 minutes later. Ping Router B, it’ working. So, now one hour wasted on one pvc... Is there something or some sequence that I missed here? I have done loads of frame-relay labs and seldom have problems. But twice now frame-relay decides it is on its own coffee break. For no apparent reason. I have also heard of DLCI’s leaking into other interfaces and neighbour statements disappearing. I have also seen a similar situation where you write erase a stubborn router and copy the same config back on and it works. Any tips or forced workarounds? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66509t=66509 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-relay on a coffee break... [7:66509]
Yes, I have see this behavior many times and the key answer give it enough time, the problem is if you start making changes and still it does not works because frame needs time be on sync, normally what I do is configure it and keep making other configurations and them come back to it and the link is working... Juan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 4:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame-relay on a coffee break... [7:66509] Would be nice to hear if anyone has encountered similars problem and has any ideas how to get past some of the sometimes animal behaviour of frame-relay. Setting up a frame-relay cloud; Router A needs to connect to Router B, DLCIs are given. Disable inverse-arp and install frame-relay map statements and vice versa. Router A tries to ping to Router B, nothing, dead. Had a quick look at the DLCIs coming into the interface - sure enough, the DLCI number is there, both sides see their respective DLCIs. So I enable inverse-arp and take out the map statements. Ping Router B and yes it sees it, so the link and cables are fine. Clear inarp cache and install map statements, disable inarp. Nothing Double check the frame switch, looks ok. Disable inarp and reboot the Router. Install map statements, ping Router B, nothing. Ping again, nothing, wait, nothing. Go have a cup of coffee, come back 20 minutes later. Ping Router B, it working. So, now one hour wasted on one pvc... Is there something or some sequence that I missed here? I have done loads of frame-relay labs and seldom have problems. But twice now frame-relay decides it is on its own coffee break. For no apparent reason. I have also heard of DLCIs leaking into other interfaces and neighbour statements disappearing. I have also seen a similar situation where you write erase a stubborn router and copy the same config back on and it works. Any tips or forced workarounds? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66513t=66509 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frame relay vpn config [7:66357]
Hi Listers, Router C has 2 sub-ifs: s0/0.1 has a PVC connected to router A, and s0/0.2 has a PVC connected to router B. I want to configure a shared-secret VPN/IPSEC tunnel between C and A/B. Ideas, sample configs or references would be appreciated. dayo __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66357t=66357 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay [7:65658]
Disregard previous. After further review, I find the ping failed because I typed in the wrong ip. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65983t=65658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay [7:65658]
Disregard previous. After further review, I find the ping failed because I typed in the wrong ip. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65658t=65658 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay question [7:65659]
I am working with the test out simulator. LAX 11.0.0.2--frame cloudsfo 11.0.0.1 In the frame relay module there is an exercise to connect 2 routers through a frame relay cloud. Initially, the LAX router is using inverse arp to do the mapping. A show frame map yields Serial 1 (up): ip 11.0.0.1 dlci 100 (0x64,0x1849, dynamic,broadcast,,,status defined,active After turning off the frame-relay inverse-arp and clearing the cache, I enter a static mapping frame map ip 11.0.0.1 100 now the show frame map yields Serial 1 (up): ip 11.0.0.1 dlci 100 (0x64,0x1849, static,CISCO, status defined, active With the dynamic mapping I can't ping the other routers interface (11.0.0.1). The static map successfully pings the other node. I understand how to set up it up. What I don't understand is why the static mapping works and the dynamic mapping doesn't. Can someone please explain this? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65659t=65659 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame Relay Design/Bandwidth Question [7:65401]
Thanks All information. Can anyone recommend the CIR/EIR/Bc in this enviroment? (2 remote and 1 HQ). I have subscribed the 3 circuit with 128k but I need to provide CIR/EIR/Bc information further. Thanks again Lo Ching Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65646t=65401 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame Relay question [7:65659]
can your message be detail moreDeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65714t=65659 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF over frame relay quick reference document [7:65517]
nice layout Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65588t=65517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF over frame relay quick reference document [7:65517]
A byproduct of some recent study. Probably should be classed a work in progress. Hope it helps http://www.chuckslongroad.info/OSPF_Frame_Reference.htm Chuck -- TANSTAAFL there ain't no such thing as a free lunch Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65517t=65517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame Relay Design/Bandwidth Question [7:65401]
hi ching, first i must say, that an LL, is most cost effective when the locations ur connecing are close in proxemity. FR will cost you less if the location if far away. for the location that has bursty traffic, you can either get a 0cir link, which doe't cost alot, but the amount of traffic should be meassured before of course, and the SLA from the provider should be checked. finally you can always get an ISDN or simply an async connection configured with DDR. Regards, Amar. Lo Ching a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear All, At first, I have 2 locations so I choose leased line (128k) to connect together. Later on, there have another remote site and it need connect to main site as well but the traffic from this new site is very bursty and not using so frequently. Can I use a small FR network with 2 remotes and 1 central site (hub-and-spoke design) to make the connection with CIR 128k at 3 points? TIA. Lo Ching Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65410t=65401 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frame relay and leased line [7:65397]
I was told that leased line price depends on distance but frame relay doesn't. Is this true? Thanks. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65397t=65397 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frame relay and leased line [7:65397]
hi, an LL is most cost effective if the sites are close in proxemity. for an FR, you will have to pay for instalation + local loop + CIR and i also seen providers that charge based on usage for FR. contact ur provider to make sure about that... supernet a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was told that leased line price depends on distance but frame relay doesn't. Is this true? Thanks. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65412t=65397 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay Design/Bandwidth Question [7:65401]
Dear All, At first, I have 2 locations so I choose leased line (128k) to connect together. Later on, there have another remote site and it need connect to main site as well but the traffic from this new site is very bursty and not using so frequently. Can I use a small FR network with 2 remotes and 1 central site (hub-and-spoke design) to make the connection with CIR 128k at 3 points? TIA. Lo Ching Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65401t=65401 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame Relay Design/Bandwidth Question [7:65401]
FR relay is quiet effective, especially with hub and multi-spoke deployemnts. One of the big advantages as well, reducing interface costs on the Hub end, as you onely have one serial interface with multiple FR PVC's? A further solution is to have a xDSL / Cable installation at the remote sites, and then vpn them to the hub route, or even VPN mesh them to each other and the HUB. It really depends on what sort of traffic flows you are expecting. Say for exampled you had a remote office that browsed the web etc, but need to connect back to the hub for internal services such as customer database / internal collabrative servers etc, then havbing a local break out, with VPN would be ok This would also reduce the dependency of the spokes on the hub for internet connectivity and would be able to run a degraded service should the hub fail. If all the spokes are doing si connecting back to the Hub, eg terminal services (SNA, TN3270 etc) Dear All, At first, I have 2 locations so I choose leased line (128k) to connect together. Later on, there have another remote site and it need connect to main site as well but the traffic from this new site is very bursty and not using so frequently. Can I use a small FR network with 2 remotes and 1 central site (hub-and-spoke design) to make the connection with CIR 128k at 3 points? TIA. Lo Ching Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65414t=65401 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: frame relay and leased line [7:65397]
FR is usefull when youhave hub and spoke deployments. By making use of shared circuit your bandwidth costs are normally a lot less thatn Leased lines. Another solution would possibl the use of VPN. WIth the price of broadband coming down, you could probably have a broadband connection at the remote site and then VPN back to the hub. This would add the benefit that the spoke would not be reliant on the hub for internet connectivity. Also depends on what sort of data is going to flow beetween the two sites, If you have high priority traffic, and your spokes dont require internet connectivity or similar, then I would use FR. supernet wrote: I was told that leased line price depends on distance but frame relay doesn't. Is this true? Thanks. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65421t=65397 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frame relay and leased line [7:65397]
I can't speak for all carriers but we don't charge mileage for frame if it's intralata but there will be an extra charge even in intralata IF one side of the connection terminates within the territory of an independant telephone company. When interlata you will be charged mileage by the long distance carrier, we are working on 271 relief!! simple huh;) Dave supernet wrote: I was told that leased line price depends on distance but frame relay doesn't. Is this true? Thanks. Yoshi -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me. --- General George S. Patton Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65433t=65397 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frame relay and leased line [7:65397]
Our carrier for LL is ATT. Their pricing was intrastate and interstate. Mileage wasn't considered. supernet wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I was told that leased line price depends on distance but frame relay doesn't. Is this true? Thanks. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65442t=65397 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]
I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame relay? Could they perhaps run ATM? My CPE CODest. CPE | Frame Relay|ATM | Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64923t=64923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]
yes there is an FRF8 and FRF5 standards that define that, as so: frf8 fr-CO-atm frf5 fr---ATM cloud--fr DeVoe, Charles (PKI) a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame relay? Could they perhaps run ATM? My CPE CODest. CPE | Frame Relay|ATM | Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64933t=64923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame relay? Could they perhaps run ATM? My CPE CODest. CPE | Frame Relay|ATM | Good question. Yes, the Frame Relay Forum defines a method for doing this. It's called Frame Relay ATM Interworking. (Yes, the word is really interworking.) I think it's somewhat common. It's been around for a while ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64936t=64923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]
the standards official names are actually FRF8 and FRF5. Priscilla Oppenheimer a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame relay? Could they perhaps run ATM? My CPE CODest. CPE | Frame Relay|ATM | Good question. Yes, the Frame Relay Forum defines a method for doing this. It's called Frame Relay ATM Interworking. (Yes, the word is really interworking.) I think it's somewhat common. It's been around for a while ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64938t=64923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]
Frame Relay connections CAN be fed into an ATM circuit at your provider's end. The translation is done via the telco. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64944t=64923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]
indeed, much like what happens with frame relay into x25, which gets encapsulated directely but in the case of FR and ATM there is some mapping to be done, like the DE field mapped to the CLP, and translation etc...; John Hutchison a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frame Relay connections CAN be fed into an ATM circuit at your provider's end. The translation is done via the telco. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64946t=64923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame relay? Could they perhaps run ATM? My CPE CODest. CPE | Frame Relay|ATM | Good question. Yes, the Frame Relay Forum defines a method for doing this. It's called Frame Relay ATM Interworking. (Yes, the word is really interworking.) I think it's somewhat common. It's been around for a while ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Yes it is fairly common. The magic is in the middle. The configs of the frame CPE and the ATM CPE wuld be the same as if you had frame/ATM respectively on the other side. The only caveat is you will most likely need to use IETF encapsulation on the frame since you will most likely not be terminating on a Cisco for the internetworking component. Dave -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me. --- General George S. Patton Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65003t=64923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]
They could. In fact, its quite likely. The link from your CPE goes into a port on one of their WAN switches. from there it goes over a trunk utilizing either Fast Packet (FP) or ATM to another WAN switch. There may be a number of WAN switches between your CPE and the destination CPE. You can get more detail from the documentation on Cisco's WAN switches. Hope this helps, Karen *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 3/10/2003 at 5:23 PM DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame relay? Could they perhaps run ATM? My CPE CODest. CPE | Frame Relay|ATM | Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64992t=64923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Basic Frame Relay question [7:64923]
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame relay? Could they perhaps run ATM? My CPE CODest. CPE | Frame Relay|ATM | Good question. Yes, the Frame Relay Forum defines a method for doing this. It's called Frame Relay ATM Interworking. (Yes, the word is really interworking.) I think it's somewhat common. It's been around for a while very common. particularly in hub and spoke situations, where the host site needs to aggregate a lot of bandwidth from a lot of remotes. way cool also is that if your telco supports it, you can do DSL to ATM also, giving quite a bit of flexibility. I have customers who are doing FRATM ( frame relay in the remote sites, and ATM at the host ) and RLAN ( DSL at the remote sites and ATM at the host site ) I don't have any customers shooting the works myself, but a couple of my co-workers have done some pretty exciting designs mixing ATM, frame, and DSL at remote sites and high cap ATM at the host. neet! ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65013t=64923 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help making a frame relay switch [7:64224]
Figure 3: NM-4T, NM-4A/S, NM-8A/S, WIC-1T, WIC-1DSU-56K4 The NM-4T serial network module has four synchronous serial interfaces. The network module supports a total full-duplex throughput of 8 megabits per second (Mbps), which can be realized over one port (at 8 Mbps) or across all four ports (at 2 Mbps on each port). The NM-4T module in any network environment delivers very low price per port and provides higher performance than comparable third-party solutions. For instance, a small or medium-sized Internet service provider (ISP) with high serial density requirements may find this solution very cost-effective per subscriber. LEDs-Network module status indicator, five Status LEDs for each serial port, including data send/receive indication. Network interfaces-Four serial interfaces. Table 2 Cable Options2 for the 4T Network Module: Product Number Cable Type Cable Name Length Connector Type CAB-V35MT V.35 DTE T1/E1 10 ft Male CAB-V35FC V.35 DCE T1/E1 10 ft Female CAB-232MT EIA/TIA -232 DTE T1/E1 10 ft Male CAB-232FC EIA/TIA -232 DCE T1/E1 10 ft Female CAB-449MT EIA/TIA -449 DTE T1/E1 10 ft Male CAB-449FC EIA/TIA -449 DCE T1/E1 10 ft Female CAB-X21MT X.21 DTE T1/E1 10 ft Male CAB-X21FC X.21 DCE T1/E1 10 ft Female CAB-530MT EIA/TIA-530 DTE T1/E1 10 ft Male Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: hepppy To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 8:11 PM Subject: Help making a frame relay switch [7:64224] Hi all, Sorry for being Naive. I am interested in creating a lab with some 10 X 26xx routers. I need to create a frame realy switch. I am not sure what to use. I have seen a Lab a couple of months back which had 8 DB60 serial cables connected to the 26xx router. Now I don;t have one of those with me, hence was searching on the net to purchase one. And I found a Description of 8 port Asynch/Synch and 2 port serial. The question is Is Asynch port the same as serial ports. Can I connect DB60 back to back cables to Asynch ports. Any other suggestions or help to make this Frame realy switch will be appreciated Thanks to all... regds hepppy [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of seral_d2.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64233t=64224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help making a frame relay switch [7:64224]
Hi all, Sorry for being Naive. I am interested in creating a lab with some 10 X 26xx routers. I need to create a frame realy switch. I am not sure what to use. I have seen a Lab a couple of months back which had 8 DB60 serial cables connected to the 26xx router. Now I don;t have one of those with me, hence was searching on the net to purchase one. And I found a Description of 8 port Asynch/Synch and 2 port serial. The question is Is Asynch port the same as serial ports. Can I connect DB60 back to back cables to Asynch ports. Any other suggestions or help to make this Frame realy switch will be appreciated Thanks to all... regds hepppy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64224t=64224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help making a frame relay switch [7:64224]
If I recall correctly, Asynch ports run at 115Kbps line rate (referred to as 'low-speed serial ports'). The idea behind using such a piece of hardware in the 2600/3600 routers is to make that specific router the Terminal Server to console into all the other routers. You could also connect back-to-back asynchs, I suppose, but I've never done it myself. -Original Message- From: hepppy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help making a frame relay switch [7:64224] Hi all, Sorry for being Naive. I am interested in creating a lab with some 10 X 26xx routers. I need to create a frame realy switch. I am not sure what to use. I have seen a Lab a couple of months back which had 8 DB60 serial cables connected to the 26xx router. Now I don;t have one of those with me, hence was searching on the net to purchase one. And I found a Description of 8 port Asynch/Synch and 2 port serial. The question is Is Asynch port the same as serial ports. Can I connect DB60 back to back cables to Asynch ports. Any other suggestions or help to make this Frame realy switch will be appreciated Thanks to all... regds hepppy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64234t=64224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help making a frame relay switch [7:64224]
Mark W. Odette II wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If I recall correctly, Asynch ports run at 115Kbps line rate (referred to as 'low-speed serial ports'). can still use that setup as a frame switch. A certain rack rental place used a router with a bunch of async ports - maybe a 2522? just be sure to use a matching clock rate on the DCE side. The idea behind using such a piece of hardware in the 2600/3600 routers is to make that specific router the Terminal Server to console into all the other routers. You could also connect back-to-back asynchs, I suppose, but I've never done it myself. -Original Message- From: hepppy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help making a frame relay switch [7:64224] Hi all, Sorry for being Naive. I am interested in creating a lab with some 10 X 26xx routers. I need to create a frame realy switch. I am not sure what to use. I have seen a Lab a couple of months back which had 8 DB60 serial cables connected to the 26xx router. Now I don;t have one of those with me, hence was searching on the net to purchase one. And I found a Description of 8 port Asynch/Synch and 2 port serial. The question is Is Asynch port the same as serial ports. Can I connect DB60 back to back cables to Asynch ports. Any other suggestions or help to make this Frame realy switch will be appreciated Thanks to all... regds hepppy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64237t=64224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973]
HI Tigers, First things, are the interfaces in a administratively shut or are the down|down ? If admin shut, then all you need to do is do a no shut under each of the interfaces you want to enable. If you do that and they are now down|down or where orginally down|down, you are not even getting a signal from the FR switch. Start with the basics and debug your LMI and see if you are getting info back! Cheers Troy tigers zheng wrote: Hi,everyone: I have a question about frame-relay!Please tell me why it happened? the topolofy :r1(s0)---(s0/0)r2(s0/1)---(s0/0)r3 r1:2511,r2:2620,r3:2621 the configuration: r1: interface s0 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ! r3: interface s0/0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! r2: frame-relay switching int s0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay route 100 interface s0/1 101 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! int s0/1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 128000 frame-relay route 101 interface s0/0 100 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! But the serial of all of the router is shutdown,line protocol is also down! I want to know what happen! Thanks very much! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64058t=63973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973]
I have a question about frame-relay!Please tell me why it happened? the topolofy :r1(s0)---(s0/0)r2(s0/1)---(s0/0)r3 r1:2511,r2:2620,r3:2621 the configuration: r1: interface s0 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ! r3: interface s0/0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! r2: frame-relay switching int s0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay route 100 interface s0/1 101 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! int s0/1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 128000 frame-relay route 101 interface s0/0 100 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! But the serial of all of the router is shutdown,line protocol is also down! I want to know what happen! Thanks very much! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63973t=63973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973]
the frame-relay intf-type command is used on a frame relay switch, as part of the switch to switch config. it should not be used on a customer edge device. if you were to enter the frame-relay switching commands on R1 and R3, the interfaces would come up and the routers would engage in frame-relay switch signaling. You probably want to remove the frame-relay intf-type commands from R1 and R3, making them customer edge devices, at which point they will communicate with R2 tigers zheng wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a question about frame-relay!Please tell me why it happened? the topolofy :r1(s0)---(s0/0)r2(s0/1)---(s0/0)r3 r1:2511,r2:2620,r3:2621 the configuration: r1: interface s0 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ! r3: interface s0/0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! r2: frame-relay switching int s0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay route 100 interface s0/1 101 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! int s0/1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 128000 frame-relay route 101 interface s0/0 100 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! But the serial of all of the router is shutdown,line protocol is also down! I want to know what happen! Thanks very much! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63987t=63973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973]
The Long and Winding Road wrote: the frame-relay intf-type command is used on a frame relay switch, as part of the switch to switch config. it should not be used on a customer edge device. He set R1 and R3 to intf-type dte. That should work, shouldn't it? I tried it on my customer edge routers and it takes the command but doesn't put it in the config since it's the default. They are connected with serial xo cables to a router in the middle that has frame-relay switching and intf-type dce configured. In other words, the same config as this fellow's, although my routers don't leave the default config line in. I would say check the cables. Are you sure you really have the dte end at the dte router and the dce end at the dce router for both cables? On some routers show controler will tell you. Priscilla if you were to enter the frame-relay switching commands on R1 and R3, the interfaces would come up and the routers would engage in frame-relay switch signaling. You probably want to remove the frame-relay intf-type commands from R1 and R3, making them customer edge devices, at which point they will communicate with R2 tigers zheng wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a question about frame-relay!Please tell me why it happened? the topolofy :r1(s0)---(s0/0)r2(s0/1)---(s0/0)r3 r1:2511,r2:2620,r3:2621 the configuration: r1: interface s0 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ! r3: interface s0/0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! r2: frame-relay switching int s0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay route 100 interface s0/1 101 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! int s0/1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 128000 frame-relay route 101 interface s0/0 100 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! But the serial of all of the router is shutdown,line protocol is also down! I want to know what happen! Thanks very much! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64001t=63973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973]
DTE/DCE has meaning at Layer 2 Frame Relay where DCE refers to the Frame Switch. DTE/DCE also has meaning at Layer 1 where we determine which end provides clocking to the line. They are two seperate configuration points. At layer one the DCE end could be the switch or the router. If you are using a back-to-back serial cable, issue a show controllers s 0 (or whatever your serial interface is named) (put a space between the word serial and the number). The output should tell you whether you have the DCE or DTE end of the cable. Configure a clock rate on the DCE end. -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973] The Long and Winding Road wrote: the frame-relay intf-type command is used on a frame relay switch, as part of the switch to switch config. it should not be used on a customer edge device. He set R1 and R3 to intf-type dte. That should work, shouldn't it? I tried it on my customer edge routers and it takes the command but doesn't put it in the config since it's the default. They are connected with serial xo cables to a router in the middle that has frame-relay switching and intf-type dce configured. In other words, the same config as this fellow's, although my routers don't leave the default config line in. I would say check the cables. Are you sure you really have the dte end at the dte router and the dce end at the dce router for both cables? On some routers show controler will tell you. Priscilla if you were to enter the frame-relay switching commands on R1 and R3, the interfaces would come up and the routers would engage in frame-relay switch signaling. You probably want to remove the frame-relay intf-type commands from R1 and R3, making them customer edge devices, at which point they will communicate with R2 tigers zheng wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a question about frame-relay!Please tell me why it happened? the topolofy :r1(s0)---(s0/0)r2(s0/1)---(s0/0)r3 r1:2511,r2:2620,r3:2621 the configuration: r1: interface s0 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ! r3: interface s0/0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! r2: frame-relay switching int s0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay route 100 interface s0/1 101 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! int s0/1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 128000 frame-relay route 101 interface s0/0 100 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! But the serial of all of the router is shutdown,line protocol is also down! I want to know what happen! Thanks very much! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64015t=63973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973]
did you enter the no shut command ? Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: tigers zheng To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:11 AM Subject: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973] I have a question about frame-relay!Please tell me why it happened? the topolofy :r1(s0)---(s0/0)r2(s0/1)---(s0/0)r3 r1:2511,r2:2620,r3:2621 the configuration: r1: interface s0 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ! r3: interface s0/0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! r2: frame-relay switching int s0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay route 100 interface s0/1 101 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! int s0/1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 128000 frame-relay route 101 interface s0/0 100 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! But the serial of all of the router is shutdown,line protocol is also down! I want to know what happen! Thanks very much! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64009t=63973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446]
Hi Deepak Let me tell u that ur interface might be adminstratively down when u cut pasted the config, Just make it up and then cut paste :-) and I have now came to conclusion after research work as It takes some time to shut the interface and bring back up so times get timed out in that case sometimes. Just try shut and no shut see it takes some time to make interface up. similarly I had ppp connection so when i cut paste my config there then also the interface does not negotiate ip address due to this reason only, as shut and no shut takes time, sometimes commands timeout in that case.as shutting till the interupt goes ,again the no shut interupt goes neither gets succesfully completed, easily observed in console debug. If Interface is already shut down and then u do then its fine no problems as link is properly down already just giving the no shut interupt to IOS makes it up. Deepak N wrote: Hi Monu I tried the configuration given by you. But i didnt find any problem in bringing up the interface when i cut and paste the configuration. Here is the config when i cut n paste the config from a text file yourname(config)#interface Serial1/1 yourname(config-if)#shut yourname(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay yourname(config-if)#frame-relay lmi-type cisco yourname(config-if)#no shut yourname(config-if)#exit yourname(config)#interface Serial1/1.1 point-to-point yourname(config-subif)#no shutdown yourname(config-subif)#ip address 20.20.20.11 255.255.255.0 yourname(config-subif)#frame-relay interface-dlci 108 yourname(config-fr-dlci)#exit yourname(config-subif)# yourname(config-subif)# *Mar 1 00:48:19.271: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial1/1, changed state to up yourname(config-subif)# yourname(config-subif)# yourname(config-subif)# yourname(config-subif)#^Z yourname# yourname# *Mar 1 00:48:28.811: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console yourname# yourname#sh ip int brief *Mar 1 00:48:30.271: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1/1, changed state to up Interface IP-Address OK? Method StatusProt ocol FastEthernet0/0172.20.110.8YES manual upup FastEthernet0/1unassigned YES unset updown ATM0/0 unassigned YES unset upup ATM0/1 unassigned YES unset upup Serial1/0 unassigned YES unset down down Serial1/0.1unassigned YES manual deleted down Serial1/1 unassigned YES unset upup Serial1/1.120.20.20.11 YES manual upup Serial1/2 unassigned YES unset down down FastEthernet1/0unassigned YES unset updown FastEthernet1/1unassigned YES unset updown yourname# Please let me know ur comments Regards Deepak Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: There's obviously no good answer to why there are no problems bringing the link up/up when you type in the commands one by one but there are problems when you copy and paste them. Here are some suggestions, though: 1) You work for Cisco. Report it as a bug. 2) The copy and paste is corrupting a character, forgetting to do carriage return or something of that nature. Do all the commands end up the in the running config? 3) There's some sort of timing issue. To fix the problem: Don't do copy and paste that fast. :-) Priscilla Monu Sekhon wrote: Hi Mark, Thanx for reply.but I mentioned that when we do shut no shut again link comes up.no dlci, no lmi problem: I am testing in lab setup two rouetrs connnected to frame-relay cloud Please do help anybody in this regard, why the link doesnot come at one instant why it requiers again shut and no shut, when i copy paste the config and when i give command by command then without gving shut and noshut the link comes up. Mark W. Odette II wrote: in show ip interface it shows as protocol down , physical link up. sh frame-relay pvs shows as inactive.no lmi are exchanged. Usually Protocol Down, Link Up indicates that you have mismatched encapsulation, LMI-Type, or even incorrect IP Addressing (wrong Subnet or incorrect Subnet Mask) between your end and the other end of the FR Network. If no LMI is exchanged, then the LMI-Type is incorrect between that Serial Interface and the Service Provider Frame Switch. If this is a Frame Relay LAB setup, double-check your Frame Relay Switch configuration. If this is a Production Setup, contact your
RE: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973]
Hi , DTE end commands on the end routers r1 and r3 has no effect whhether u give or not so not at all problem . yes they dont appear in running-config thats true as by default is dte device(routers) another thing as others suspect it could be wrong cable problem(probably DTE and DCE end) . try running hdlc and check Daniel Cotts wrote: DTE/DCE has meaning at Layer 2 Frame Relay where DCE refers to the Frame Switch. DTE/DCE also has meaning at Layer 1 where we determine which end provides clocking to the line. They are two seperate configuration points. At layer one the DCE end could be the switch or the router. If you are using a back-to-back serial cable, issue a show controllers s 0 (or whatever your serial interface is named) (put a space between the word serial and the number). The output should tell you whether you have the DCE or DTE end of the cable. Configure a clock rate on the DCE end. -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973] The Long and Winding Road wrote: the frame-relay intf-type command is used on a frame relay switch, as part of the switch to switch config. it should not be used on a customer edge device. He set R1 and R3 to intf-type dte. That should work, shouldn't it? I tried it on my customer edge routers and it takes the command but doesn't put it in the config since it's the default. They are connected with serial xo cables to a router in the middle that has frame-relay switching and intf-type dce configured. In other words, the same config as this fellow's, although my routers don't leave the default config line in. I would say check the cables. Are you sure you really have the dte end at the dte router and the dce end at the dce router for both cables? On some routers show controler will tell you. Priscilla if you were to enter the frame-relay switching commands on R1 and R3, the interfaces would come up and the routers would engage in frame-relay switch signaling. You probably want to remove the frame-relay intf-type commands from R1 and R3, making them customer edge devices, at which point they will communicate with R2 tigers zheng wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a question about frame-relay!Please tell me why it happened? the topolofy :r1(s0)---(s0/0)r2(s0/1)---(s0/0)r3 r1:2511,r2:2620,r3:2621 the configuration: r1: interface s0 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ! r3: interface s0/0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! r2: frame-relay switching int s0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay route 100 interface s0/1 101 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! int s0/1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 128000 frame-relay route 101 interface s0/0 100 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! But the serial of all of the router is shutdown,line protocol is also down! I want to know what happen! Thanks very much! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64028t=63973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973]
I think its not about FR config but the physical layer. You need to check the cables. You are not using any modems??? I hope this helps -Original Message- From: tigers zheng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973] I have a question about frame-relay!Please tell me why it happened? the topolofy :r1(s0)---(s0/0)r2(s0/1)---(s0/0)r3 r1:2511,r2:2620,r3:2621 the configuration: r1: interface s0 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 100 ! r3: interface s0/0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dte frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! r2: frame-relay switching int s0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay route 100 interface s0/1 101 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! int s0/1 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 128000 frame-relay route 101 interface s0/0 100 frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! But the serial of all of the router is shutdown,line protocol is also down! I want to know what happen! Thanks very much! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64003t=63973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
show frame-relay traffic [7:64046]
I have noticed that the show frame-relay traffic on my routers does not show that routers have sent and received inverse arp requests. Does any body know why is that? Thanks John Tafasi r5#show frame-relay map Serial0 (up): ip 10.10.10.2 dlci 501(0x1F5,0x7C50), dynamic, broadcast,, status defined, active Serial0 (up): ip 10.10.10.4 dlci 504(0x1F8,0x7C80), dynamic, broadcast,, status defined, active r5#show frame-relay traffic Frame Relay statistics: ARP requests sent 0, ARP replies sent 0 ARP request recvd 0, ARP replies recvd 0 r5# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64046t=64046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446]
Hi Monu I tried the configuration given by you. But i didnt find any problem in bringing up the interface when i cut and paste the configuration. Here is the config when i cut n paste the config from a text file yourname(config)#interface Serial1/1 yourname(config-if)#shut yourname(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay yourname(config-if)#frame-relay lmi-type cisco yourname(config-if)#no shut yourname(config-if)#exit yourname(config)#interface Serial1/1.1 point-to-point yourname(config-subif)#no shutdown yourname(config-subif)#ip address 20.20.20.11 255.255.255.0 yourname(config-subif)#frame-relay interface-dlci 108 yourname(config-fr-dlci)#exit yourname(config-subif)# yourname(config-subif)# *Mar 1 00:48:19.271: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial1/1, changed state to up yourname(config-subif)# yourname(config-subif)# yourname(config-subif)# yourname(config-subif)#^Z yourname# yourname# *Mar 1 00:48:28.811: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console yourname# yourname#sh ip int brief *Mar 1 00:48:30.271: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1/1, changed state to up Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Prot ocol FastEthernet0/0172.20.110.8YES manual up up FastEthernet0/1unassigned YES unset up down ATM0/0 unassigned YES unset up up ATM0/1 unassigned YES unset up up Serial1/0 unassigned YES unset down down Serial1/0.1unassigned YES manual deleted down Serial1/1 unassigned YES unset up up Serial1/1.120.20.20.11 YES manual up up Serial1/2 unassigned YES unset down down FastEthernet1/0unassigned YES unset up down FastEthernet1/1unassigned YES unset up down yourname# Please let me know ur comments Regards Deepak Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: There's obviously no good answer to why there are no problems bringing the link up/up when you type in the commands one by one but there are problems when you copy and paste them. Here are some suggestions, though: 1) You work for Cisco. Report it as a bug. 2) The copy and paste is corrupting a character, forgetting to do carriage return or something of that nature. Do all the commands end up the in the running config? 3) There's some sort of timing issue. To fix the problem: Don't do copy and paste that fast. :-) Priscilla Monu Sekhon wrote: Hi Mark, Thanx for reply.but I mentioned that when we do shut no shut again link comes up.no dlci, no lmi problem: I am testing in lab setup two rouetrs connnected to frame-relay cloud Please do help anybody in this regard, why the link doesnot come at one instant why it requiers again shut and no shut, when i copy paste the config and when i give command by command then without gving shut and noshut the link comes up. Mark W. Odette II wrote: in show ip interface it shows as protocol down , physical link up. sh frame-relay pvs shows as inactive.no lmi are exchanged. Usually Protocol Down, Link Up indicates that you have mismatched encapsulation, LMI-Type, or even incorrect IP Addressing (wrong Subnet or incorrect Subnet Mask) between your end and the other end of the FR Network. If no LMI is exchanged, then the LMI-Type is incorrect between that Serial Interface and the Service Provider Frame Switch. If this is a Frame Relay LAB setup, double-check your Frame Relay Switch configuration. If this is a Production Setup, contact your ISP and verify your Frame Relay configuration parameters. (LMI-Type, DLCI, etc.) On the No Shut command, I'd use it last on each interface you configure. -Mark -Original Message- From: Monu Sekhon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446] Hi Larry/John, I forgot to mention no shut in the above confif while writing here, Its still there and connection does not come out See I mentioned that while giving command by command manually connection comes out. It seems to me that while the interface is down during that frame-relay LMIs think that interface is down and make the link down. I am rather confused.I dont know but this is happening. again writing config: -- interface Serial0 shut (if i give here no shut then link comes up at one go) encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco no shut exit interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
ospf p2p network type vs frame relay inarp [7:63579]
Hi all, I did some tests and found this problem. Ra is the hub of fr connection, rc is the spoke When only inarp used, all ospf network types passed the test except p2p network type. No adjacency was able to be established. OSPF states kept looping between init, exstart and exchange. Note, same configuration, only ip ospf network statement was changed. I could not find any document about ospf p2p type vs frame relay inarp. Does anyone else come across the same problem in the lab? Thanks Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63579t=63579 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ospf p2p network type vs frame relay inarp [7:63579]
Hi, the reason is that the serial interface with encapsulation frame-relay is a point-to-multipoint interface by default. Inverse ARP allows multiple DLCIs. If you want to use point-to-point links, you have to use a ptp subinterface. But then you cannot use inverse arp (it only works on the main interface). You have to specify the DLCI. Example: interface serial 0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay interface serial 0.1 point ip address xxx frame-relay interface-dlci xx end Jens --- Paul Dong So wrote: Hi all, I did some tests and found this problem. Ra is the hub of fr connection, rc is the spoke When only inarp used, all ospf network types passed the test except p2p network type. No adjacency was able to be established. OSPF states kept looping between init, exstart and exchange. Note, same configuration, only ip ospf network statement was changed. I could not find any document about ospf p2p type vs frame relay inarp. Does anyone else come across the same problem in the lab? Thanks Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63595t=63579 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446]
Hi Mark, Thanx for reply.but I mentioned that when we do shut no shut again link comes up.no dlci, no lmi problem: I am testing in lab setup two rouetrs connnected to frame-relay cloud Please do help anybody in this regard, why the link doesnot come at one instant why it requiers again shut and no shut, when i copy paste the config and when i give command by command then without gving shut and noshut the link comes up. Mark W. Odette II wrote: in show ip interface it shows as protocol down , physical link up. sh frame-relay pvs shows as inactive.no lmi are exchanged. Usually Protocol Down, Link Up indicates that you have mismatched encapsulation, LMI-Type, or even incorrect IP Addressing (wrong Subnet or incorrect Subnet Mask) between your end and the other end of the FR Network. If no LMI is exchanged, then the LMI-Type is incorrect between that Serial Interface and the Service Provider Frame Switch. If this is a Frame Relay LAB setup, double-check your Frame Relay Switch configuration. If this is a Production Setup, contact your ISP and verify your Frame Relay configuration parameters. (LMI-Type, DLCI, etc.) On the No Shut command, I'd use it last on each interface you configure. -Mark -Original Message- From: Monu Sekhon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446] Hi Larry/John, I forgot to mention no shut in the above confif while writing here, Its still there and connection does not come out See I mentioned that while giving command by command manually connection comes out. It seems to me that while the interface is down during that frame-relay LMIs think that interface is down and make the link down. I am rather confused.I dont know but this is happening. again writing config: -- interface Serial0 shut (if i give here no shut then link comes up at one go) encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco no shut exit interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 108 exit and also John try these in your router but at one go the interface will not come up as far i know .I agree with ur confguration and mine is also correct .Its said by Prisicilla and others that shutting a interface is good practise while configuring encap types.This i read in one of the previous Posts. so can u all reply what is the problem here in show ip interface it shows as protocol down , physical link up. sh frame-relay pvs shows as inactive.no lmi are exchanged. any help will be appreciated. - Larry Letterman wrote: enter the no shut command into your cut and paste script for the Int Ser0 and it will come up..all interfaces in a router are always defaulted to shutdown..In your case the Main interface needs to be no shut in order for the logical interface to work... -- Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Monu Sekhon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All Hey I am facing a strange problem in frame-relay My config -- my initial config int serial 0 (nothing confgured initially) Then I cut paste this config and my link does not come up means Interface does not come up. interface Serial0 shut (if i give here no shut then link comes up at one go) encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco exit interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 108 exit I have to do shut and no shut on main interface why ? if the above commands i execute one by one then the link comes up. Is it a differnece between pasting the config at one go or what when i give command single by single. I enable debugging for frame-relay packets and it shows encap faiiled once only on the above sub interface.is anything frame-relay lmis has anything to do. I am very confused. Thanx in advance [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63495t=63446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446]
There's obviously no good answer to why there are no problems bringing the link up/up when you type in the commands one by one but there are problems when you copy and paste them. Here are some suggestions, though: 1) You work for Cisco. Report it as a bug. 2) The copy and paste is corrupting a character, forgetting to do carriage return or something of that nature. Do all the commands end up the in the running config? 3) There's some sort of timing issue. To fix the problem: Don't do copy and paste that fast. :-) Priscilla Monu Sekhon wrote: Hi Mark, Thanx for reply.but I mentioned that when we do shut no shut again link comes up.no dlci, no lmi problem: I am testing in lab setup two rouetrs connnected to frame-relay cloud Please do help anybody in this regard, why the link doesnot come at one instant why it requiers again shut and no shut, when i copy paste the config and when i give command by command then without gving shut and noshut the link comes up. Mark W. Odette II wrote: in show ip interface it shows as protocol down , physical link up. sh frame-relay pvs shows as inactive.no lmi are exchanged. Usually Protocol Down, Link Up indicates that you have mismatched encapsulation, LMI-Type, or even incorrect IP Addressing (wrong Subnet or incorrect Subnet Mask) between your end and the other end of the FR Network. If no LMI is exchanged, then the LMI-Type is incorrect between that Serial Interface and the Service Provider Frame Switch. If this is a Frame Relay LAB setup, double-check your Frame Relay Switch configuration. If this is a Production Setup, contact your ISP and verify your Frame Relay configuration parameters. (LMI-Type, DLCI, etc.) On the No Shut command, I'd use it last on each interface you configure. -Mark -Original Message- From: Monu Sekhon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446] Hi Larry/John, I forgot to mention no shut in the above confif while writing here, Its still there and connection does not come out See I mentioned that while giving command by command manually connection comes out. It seems to me that while the interface is down during that frame-relay LMIs think that interface is down and make the link down. I am rather confused.I dont know but this is happening. again writing config: -- interface Serial0 shut (if i give here no shut then link comes up at one go) encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco no shut exit interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 108 exit and also John try these in your router but at one go the interface will not come up as far i know .I agree with ur confguration and mine is also correct .Its said by Prisicilla and others that shutting a interface is good practise while configuring encap types.This i read in one of the previous Posts. so can u all reply what is the problem here in show ip interface it shows as protocol down , physical link up. sh frame-relay pvs shows as inactive.no lmi are exchanged. any help will be appreciated. - Larry Letterman wrote: enter the no shut command into your cut and paste script for the Int Ser0 and it will come up..all interfaces in a router are always defaulted to shutdown..In your case the Main interface needs to be no shut in order for the logical interface to work... -- Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Monu Sekhon wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi All Hey I am facing a strange problem in frame-relay My config -- my initial config int serial 0 (nothing confgured initially) Then I cut paste this config and my link does not come up means Interface does not come up. interface Serial0 shut (if i give here no shut then link comes up at one go) encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco exit interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 108 exit I have to do shut and no shut on main interface why ? if the above commands i execute one by one then the link comes up. Is it a differnece between pasting the config at one go or what when i give command single by single. I enable debugging for frame-relay packets and it shows encap faiiled once only on the above sub interface.is anything frame-relay lmis has anything to do. I am very confused. Thanx in advance [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63523t
Frame-Relay issue [7:63446]
Hi All Hey I am facing a strange problem in frame-relay My config -- my initial config int serial 0 (nothing confgured initially) Then I cut paste this config and my link does not come up means Interface does not come up. interface Serial0 shut (if i give here no shut then link comes up at one go) encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco exit interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 108 exit I have to do shut and no shut on main interface why ? if the above commands i execute one by one then the link comes up. Is it a differnece between pasting the config at one go or what when i give command single by single. I enable debugging for frame-relay packets and it shows encap faiiled once only on the above sub interface.is anything frame-relay lmis has anything to do. I am very confused. Thanx in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63446t=63446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446]
I would check your settings such as the LMI type, Have you done any other fault finding yet ? Such as sh frame relay pvc ? Once you hit no shutdown, the interface becomes live in a way of speaking. Here is an example of one of my configs. interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF ! interface Serial0/0.1AA point-to-point description Johns Config ip address x.x.x.x b.b.b.b no cdp enable frame-relay interface-dlci AA IETF I have replaced some values here with letters for security John ** visit http://www.solution6.com UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk ** The Solution 6 Head Office and NSW Branch has moved premises. Please make sure you have updated your records with our new details. Level 14, 383 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000. General Phone: 61 2 9278 0666 General Fax: 61 2 9278 0555 ** This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63449t=63446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446]
enter the no shut command into your cut and paste script for the Int Ser0 and it will come up..all interfaces in a router are always defaulted to shutdown..In your case the Main interface needs to be no shut in order for the logical interface to work... -- Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Monu Sekhon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All Hey I am facing a strange problem in frame-relay My config -- my initial config int serial 0 (nothing confgured initially) Then I cut paste this config and my link does not come up means Interface does not come up. interface Serial0 shut (if i give here no shut then link comes up at one go) encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco exit interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 108 exit I have to do shut and no shut on main interface why ? if the above commands i execute one by one then the link comes up. Is it a differnece between pasting the config at one go or what when i give command single by single. I enable debugging for frame-relay packets and it shows encap faiiled once only on the above sub interface.is anything frame-relay lmis has anything to do. I am very confused. Thanx in advance [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63454t=63446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446]
Hi Larry/John, I forgot to mention no shut in the above confif while writing here, Its still there and connection does not come out See I mentioned that while giving command by command manually connection comes out. It seems to me that while the interface is down during that frame-relay LMIs think that interface is down and make the link down. I am rather confused.I dont know but this is happening. again writing config: -- interface Serial0 shut (if i give here no shut then link comes up at one go) encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco no shut exit interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 108 exit and also John try these in your router but at one go the interface will not come up as far i know .I agree with ur confguration and mine is also correct .Its said by Prisicilla and others that shutting a interface is good practise while configuring encap types.This i read in one of the previous Posts. so can u all reply what is the problem here in show ip interface it shows as protocol down , physical link up. sh frame-relay pvs shows as inactive.no lmi are exchanged. any help will be appreciated. - Larry Letterman wrote: enter the no shut command into your cut and paste script for the Int Ser0 and it will come up..all interfaces in a router are always defaulted to shutdown..In your case the Main interface needs to be no shut in order for the logical interface to work... -- Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Monu Sekhon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All Hey I am facing a strange problem in frame-relay My config -- my initial config int serial 0 (nothing confgured initially) Then I cut paste this config and my link does not come up means Interface does not come up. interface Serial0 shut (if i give here no shut then link comes up at one go) encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco exit interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 108 exit I have to do shut and no shut on main interface why ? if the above commands i execute one by one then the link comes up. Is it a differnece between pasting the config at one go or what when i give command single by single. I enable debugging for frame-relay packets and it shows encap faiiled once only on the above sub interface.is anything frame-relay lmis has anything to do. I am very confused. Thanx in advance [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63459t=63446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446]
in show ip interface it shows as protocol down , physical link up. sh frame-relay pvs shows as inactive.no lmi are exchanged. Usually Protocol Down, Link Up indicates that you have mismatched encapsulation, LMI-Type, or even incorrect IP Addressing (wrong Subnet or incorrect Subnet Mask) between your end and the other end of the FR Network. If no LMI is exchanged, then the LMI-Type is incorrect between that Serial Interface and the Service Provider Frame Switch. If this is a Frame Relay LAB setup, double-check your Frame Relay Switch configuration. If this is a Production Setup, contact your ISP and verify your Frame Relay configuration parameters. (LMI-Type, DLCI, etc.) On the No Shut command, I'd use it last on each interface you configure. -Mark -Original Message- From: Monu Sekhon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446] Hi Larry/John, I forgot to mention no shut in the above confif while writing here, Its still there and connection does not come out See I mentioned that while giving command by command manually connection comes out. It seems to me that while the interface is down during that frame-relay LMIs think that interface is down and make the link down. I am rather confused.I dont know but this is happening. again writing config: -- interface Serial0 shut (if i give here no shut then link comes up at one go) encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco no shut exit interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 108 exit and also John try these in your router but at one go the interface will not come up as far i know .I agree with ur confguration and mine is also correct .Its said by Prisicilla and others that shutting a interface is good practise while configuring encap types.This i read in one of the previous Posts. so can u all reply what is the problem here in show ip interface it shows as protocol down , physical link up. sh frame-relay pvs shows as inactive.no lmi are exchanged. any help will be appreciated. - Larry Letterman wrote: enter the no shut command into your cut and paste script for the Int Ser0 and it will come up..all interfaces in a router are always defaulted to shutdown..In your case the Main interface needs to be no shut in order for the logical interface to work... -- Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Monu Sekhon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All Hey I am facing a strange problem in frame-relay My config -- my initial config int serial 0 (nothing confgured initially) Then I cut paste this config and my link does not come up means Interface does not come up. interface Serial0 shut (if i give here no shut then link comes up at one go) encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type cisco exit interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no shutdown ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 108 exit I have to do shut and no shut on main interface why ? if the above commands i execute one by one then the link comes up. Is it a differnece between pasting the config at one go or what when i give command single by single. I enable debugging for frame-relay packets and it shows encap faiiled once only on the above sub interface.is anything frame-relay lmis has anything to do. I am very confused. Thanx in advance [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63482t=63446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame relay in Lab [7:63248]
Hi, I want to set up frame relay in a lab, are there any emulation software to mimic the frame relay cloud? if not, what's the best was of doing this ___ Kerry [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Clear Day Bkgrd.JPG] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63248t=63248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame relay in Lab [7:63248]
Hi Kerry, The easiest way of doing this is just getting a cisco router with numerous serial interfaces and configure it as a frame relay switch. I uase a Cisco 4500 with 8 serial ports in my lab. Cheers Troy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63250t=63248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame relay in Lab [7:63248]
The best way is to get a box with multiple serial interfaces such as a 2522 or 2523 and configure it as a frame switch. This seems to be the most common way, anyway. -- Johnny Routin )?) - Kerry Ogedegbe [ MTN - Portharcourt ] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, I want to set up frame relay in a lab, are there any emulation software to mimic the frame relay cloud? if not, what's the best was of doing this ___ Kerry [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Clear Day Bkgrd.JPG] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63251t=63248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frame relay lmi-n39x functions [7:63120]
Hi, the commands work different than you describe. The status request ist sent every 10 sec (keepalive 10). Every 10 sec an answer is received. By default every 6th status request is a full status request. The answer then contains the DLCIs and the status of each DLCI. The command lmi-n391dte 3 changes the full status request from every 6th to every 3rd. The command lmi-n392dte 2 changes the number of status errors from 3 to 2. This is only relevant when no status answers are received. Try the following link: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00800ca7eb.html Jens Neelsen --- paul dong so wrote: Hi all, while practicing frame-relay lmi-n39x commonds, i can not make the commonds work as they are supposed to be. Scenario: frame-relay switch RA on RA, use lmi autosense. basic FR function works fine, following config is abstract only serial 0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay interface-dlci 401 ip address 150.50.24.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay lmi-n391dte 3 frame-relay lmi-n392dte 2 frame-relay lmi-n393dte 2 keepalive 10 If debu frame lmi is turned on, i would expect every 30 seconds, 3 status requests will be sent out serial0 as a result of frame-relay lmi-n391dte 3 and lmi autosense. But i can only see one status request is sent. Tried shut/no shut interface, etc to no vail. Any idea how these commands affect frame relay behaviors? Thanks Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63126t=63120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frame relay lmi-n39x functions [7:63120]
Hi Jens, Thanks for the information. What confused me is this url: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/wan_c/wcdfrely.htm#46235 It states The only visible indication to the user that LMI autosense is underway is when debug frame lmi is turned on. Every N391 interval, the user will now see three rapid status enquiries coming out of the serial interface. One in ANSI, one in ITU and one in cisco LMI-type. It behaves differently from what i saw. when interface just becomes up/up, three status requests are sent, but after that, only one status request is sent, which doesn't match what is described above. Regards, Paul Jens Neelsen wrote: Hi, the commands work different than you describe. The status request ist sent every 10 sec (keepalive 10). Every 10 sec an answer is received. By default every 6th status request is a full status request. The answer then contains the DLCIs and the status of each DLCI. The command lmi-n391dte 3 changes the full status request from every 6th to every 3rd. The command lmi-n392dte 2 changes the number of status errors from 3 to 2. This is only relevant when no status answers are received. Try the following link: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00800ca7eb.html Jens Neelsen --- paul dong so wrote: Hi all, while practicing frame-relay lmi-n39x commonds, i can not make the commonds work as they are supposed to be. Scenario: frame-relay switch RA on RA, use lmi autosense. basic FR function works fine, following config is abstract only serial 0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay interface-dlci 401 ip address 150.50.24.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay lmi-n391dte 3 frame-relay lmi-n392dte 2 frame-relay lmi-n393dte 2 keepalive 10 If debu frame lmi is turned on, i would expect every 30 seconds, 3 status requests will be sent out serial0 as a result of frame-relay lmi-n391dte 3 and lmi autosense. But i can only see one status request is sent. Tried shut/no shut interface, etc to no vail. Any idea how these commands affect frame relay behaviors? Thanks Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63129t=63120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frame relay lmi-n39x functions [7:63120]
Hi all, while practicing frame-relay lmi-n39x commonds, i can not make the commonds work as they are supposed to be. Scenario: frame-relay switch RA on RA, use lmi autosense. basic FR function works fine, following config is abstract only serial 0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay interface-dlci 401 ip address 150.50.24.2 255.255.255.0 frame-relay lmi-n391dte 3 frame-relay lmi-n392dte 2 frame-relay lmi-n393dte 2 keepalive 10 If debu frame lmi is turned on, i would expect every 30 seconds, 3 status requests will be sent out serial0 as a result of frame-relay lmi-n391dte 3 and lmi autosense. But i can only see one status request is sent. Tried shut/no shut interface, etc to no vail. Any idea how these commands affect frame relay behaviors? Thanks Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63120t=63120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]
When studying for the CCIE with friends, we decided that if you forget the broadcast keyword, the terrorists win. --T Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62754t=62614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]
Hello, I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides internet access to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote peer...however, no other access to anywhere...further more...the encapsulation is failing on debug outputshere is the output... sh frame pvc PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) Active Inactive Deleted Static Local 1000 Switched 0000 Unused 0000 DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0 input pkts 4100 output pkts 15 in bytes 288952 out bytes 1560 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec pvc create time 01:28:58, last time pvc status changed 00:03:08 sh frame map Serial0 (up): ip x.x.x.x dlci 114(0x72,0x1C20), static, IETF, BW = 256000, status defined, active deb ip packet 01:40:33: IP: s=x.x.x.x (Serial0), d=y.y.y.y (Serial0), len 84, rcvd 3 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x (Serial0), len 84, sending 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x(Serial0), len 84, encapsu lation failed Basic Encap Settings encapsulation frame-relay ietf frame-relay map ip z.z.z.z 114 ietf frame-relay lmi-type ansi Thia is very urgent...any help as to what might be happening would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!! -- Dain Deutschman CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA Data Communications Manager New Star Sales and Service, Inc. 800.261.0475 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62614t=62614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]
Dain, another day I had the same problem... In my case I was using a static route like this: ip route x.x.x.x mask serial0/1 when I changed to ip route x.x.x.x mask y.y.y.y I got to solve the problem... You can try... Pedro A. do Valle Manaus - AM - Brazil 55 92 614 3105 - Original Message - From: Dain Deutschman To: Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:29 PM Subject: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614] Hello, I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides internet access to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote peer...however, no other access to anywhere...further more...the encapsulation is failing on debug outputshere is the output... sh frame pvc PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) Active Inactive Deleted Static Local 1000 Switched 0000 Unused 0000 DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0 input pkts 4100 output pkts 15 in bytes 288952 out bytes 1560 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec pvc create time 01:28:58, last time pvc status changed 00:03:08 sh frame map Serial0 (up): ip x.x.x.x dlci 114(0x72,0x1C20), static, IETF, BW = 256000, status defined, active deb ip packet 01:40:33: IP: s=x.x.x.x (Serial0), d=y.y.y.y (Serial0), len 84, rcvd 3 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x (Serial0), len 84, sending 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x(Serial0), len 84, encapsu lation failed Basic Encap Settings encapsulation frame-relay ietf frame-relay map ip z.z.z.z 114 ietf frame-relay lmi-type ansi Thia is very urgent...any help as to what might be happening would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!! -- Dain Deutschman CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA Data Communications Manager New Star Sales and Service, Inc. 800.261.0475 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62620t=62614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]
Dain Deutschman wrote: Hello, I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides internet access to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote peer...however, no other access to anywhere... How is the router supposed to learn about anywhere else? Are you running a routing protcol? Do you have static routes? What does show ip route display? If you're using a routing protocol that depends on broadcasts, don't forget to add the broadcast keyword to your map statement. Priscilla further more...the encapsulation is failing on debug outputshere is the output... sh frame pvc PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) Active Inactive Deleted Static Local 1000 Switched 0000 Unused 0000 DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0 input pkts 4100 output pkts 15 in bytes 288952 out bytes 1560 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec pvc create time 01:28:58, last time pvc status changed 00:03:08 sh frame map Serial0 (up): ip x.x.x.x dlci 114(0x72,0x1C20), static, IETF, BW = 256000, status defined, active deb ip packet 01:40:33: IP: s=x.x.x.x (Serial0), d=y.y.y.y (Serial0), len 84, rcvd 3 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x (Serial0), len 84, sending 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x(Serial0), len 84, encapsu lation failed Basic Encap Settings encapsulation frame-relay ietf frame-relay map ip z.z.z.z 114 ietf frame-relay lmi-type ansi Thia is very urgent...any help as to what might be happening would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!! -- Dain Deutschman CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA Data Communications Manager New Star Sales and Service, Inc. 800.261.0475 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62623t=62614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]
Hi , I think the problem with routing issue as metioned by priscilla also and others. Either there is no route entry here i mean no static route to remote network if u are using static routing. and if dynamic u need to enter brodacst key word. and do check ur route -table like example in route table entry should be like this routing table: destination newtowork metric (static or dynamic) This next hop address is mapped to your dlci and it should be otherwise Encapsulation failed error always comes in multipoint interface confguration. as when u are sending packet to remote network at layer 3 the the next hop address is looked first to reach remote network and then at layer 2 after seeing the frame-relay mapping the frame-relay packet is addressed with the dlci number Same error will also come when u remove your mapping and then check by pinging remote peer. Hope this clears if not then write in detail Regards, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Dain Deutschman wrote: Hello, I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides internet access to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote peer...however, no other access to anywhere... How is the router supposed to learn about anywhere else? Are you running a routing protcol? Do you have static routes? What does show ip route display? If you're using a routing protocol that depends on broadcasts, don't forget to add the broadcast keyword to your map statement. Priscilla further more...the encapsulation is failing on debug outputshere is the output... sh frame pvc PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE) Active Inactive Deleted Static Local 1000 Switched 0000 Unused 0000 DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial0 input pkts 4100 output pkts 15 in bytes 288952 out bytes 1560 dropped pkts 0 in FECN pkts 0 in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0 out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 0 out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 0 out bcast bytes 0 5 minute input rate 3000 bits/sec, 6 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec pvc create time 01:28:58, last time pvc status changed 00:03:08 sh frame map Serial0 (up): ip x.x.x.x dlci 114(0x72,0x1C20), static, IETF, BW = 256000, status defined, active deb ip packet 01:40:33: IP: s=x.x.x.x (Serial0), d=y.y.y.y (Serial0), len 84, rcvd 3 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x (Serial0), len 84, sending 01:40:33: IP: s=y.y.y.y (local), d=x.x.x.x(Serial0), len 84, encapsu lation failed Basic Encap Settings encapsulation frame-relay ietf frame-relay map ip z.z.z.z 114 ietf frame-relay lmi-type ansi Thia is very urgent...any help as to what might be happening would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!! -- Dain Deutschman CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA Data Communications Manager New Star Sales and Service, Inc. 800.261.0475 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62626t=62614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frame-relay theoretical topic / question [7:62517]
3 locations. Milwaukee, Madison, Greenbay. Milwaukee and Madison both have a 128k port 64k CIR. Greenbay has full T1 with 64k CIR. From Milwaukee why is Greenbay's ping response times almost 3 times faster than Madisons? Wouldn't Milwaukee being the bottle neck of 128k port rate make both ping response times closer to the same? Or is this like the highway theory of Greenbay has a Full T1 most of the way so you can go faster on that portion of the drive therefore the ping response times are much faster?? Thanks for any input. Cory Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62517t=62517 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
