Gruss,
There's only ever been one reason - US foreign policy that favors one
terrorist over another: The Shah over the clerics; Iraq over Iranian
clerics, Saudi Arabia over Iraq, Israel over Palestine.
I think you have a problem with history here. The Jews did not teach the Arabs terrorist
1.) Creating new terrorists, the so called hearts and minds.Those
in the region (King of Jordan, Prime Minister of Pakistan) have
explicitly said no.Not only that, but they've described how the war
has inflamed radical Muslims and that has balloned al Queda
recruitment and created new al
For those that remember the last Community Suite, we had about 15 feet of books. This year, we'd like to have that and more.
(Yes, the Community Suite is happening. Yes, we're running it. Yes, we still have room for sponsors.)
So we're asking for what people think are good books to request from
Again, not true. Phoning ahead 3 times to get civilians out of a military target is well within the bounds of a military strike. Blowing up innocent vacationers without any warning or connection to the military is not. There is no comparison and the attempt to draw one is both sickening and
Gruss Gott wrote:
The point is that the Jews used terrorism to get what wanted
politically - phoning ahead doesn't exactly lessen the death of a
hundred people; the Jews certainly didn't hold off because the hotel
wasn't evacuated, did they?
I would not consider an attack against the
Hi,
This sounds to good to be true, lifetime music etc downloads for 40
dollars
http://www.thedownloadplace.com
Any one you know heard of it or dealt with it.
--
James Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Holy Crap - the have the Suburbs and Run Westy Run, and Jack Logan, and...and...
Okay.who's gonna take the plunge. I _want_ this.
Note - they do have a record with Better Business Bureau. But, it's 3
complaints over the last 36 months, and all have been responded to
resolved.
And, some days my grandma remembers my name, too. ;)
He was fine in the second debate.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Eesh. That is scary. And, yah, those usually do kill a person. Glad
that something made you go get checked out and that you pulled
through.
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:33:03 -0600, dana tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pulmonary embolism.
Known in medical terms as you were really lucky, God was on
This is ridiculous. What would you of had him do, Angel? Completely ignore his generals? Wasn't that the liberal side a few weeks ago? That there were generals telling him he needed more troops, and he ignored them? Now he's saying the generals told him they had plenty of troops, and you are
I'd comment on this tripe, but the Dinowitz's set is perfectly straight.
It's the jews own fault their children are being blown up..that's some argument.
- Original Message -
From: Gruss Gott
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: The politicization
The issue I have is that most music sites are charging around 99c per song,
these guys are only charging $40 for a lifetime of unlimited downloads.I
was wondering if anyone had any first hand experience of the site to either
say yes, it's great and worth every penny or no, the music selection
Attacks on US soldiers aren't terrorism...ok. What about the kidnapping and beheading of foreign journalists and civilians? What about car bombs exploding at IRAQI police stations? Bombs exploding in shopping centers, killing women, children?
These freedom fighters that you are so fond of in
Yep, I get that, and I'm just saying, I want to know, too. It does
seem to good to be true. And, usually things that seem too good to be
true are. But, they certainly have a lot of relatively obscure
musicians in their catalog - stuff that I would want to download. I
just wonder if it's for real.
Leaving aside the generals issue,I agree with the sentiment of the
article, in that Bush's inability to answer that question reflected
pretty poorly on him, and his handlers. I mean, he had to know that
that question would come up. Hell, it comes up in darn near every
interview. It's essentially
The main thing that makes we curious is all the software and TV shows, if it
was just music I could almost believe it but some of the software on offer
costs more than $40 each and I was unaware that any TV production companies
had approved their shows for download.
--
Jay
_
From: Deanna
agreed.
It seems like his handlers told him if this question comes up, side step it, redirect it, don't apologize for anything. It's a mistake in my opinion.
He had to know that question was coming...i mean, we lowly developers prepare for that question when we're getting ready for a job
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=thedownloadplace.comhl=enlr=c2coff=1selm=926e353.0308200649.6d83686d%40posting.google.comrnum=1
- Original Message -
From: James Smith
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 6:50 AM
Subject: Music Downloads
Hi,
This sounds to good to be
Well that is certainly a good start! Thanks.
--
Jay
_
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 October 2004 14:04
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Music Downloads
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=thedownloadplace.comhl=enlr=c2coff=1se
*sigh* That's what I figured.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:04:00 -0400, Howie Hamlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=thedownloadplace.comhl=enlr=c2coff=1selm=926e353.0308200649.6d83686d%40posting.google.comrnum=1
- Original Message -
From: James Smith
To:
If you google downloadplace, you'll actually find a bunch of it's a
scam information. I probably should have just done that right off. :)
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:15:05 +0100, James Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well that is certainly a good start! Thanks.
--
Jay
_
From: Howie Hamlin
My guess - tho' it's only that - is that they're tool fronts either a P2P or
UseNet network or, even worse, that they just provide (presumably mostly
broken) web links.
They keep making noise about how legal it is but that they have more than
any anybody else.I don't think they could have
The thing that makes me wonder is that they have Windows XP available
for download.Something reeks in this offer.
Marlon
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:50:28 +0100, James Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This sounds to good to be true, lifetime music etc downloads for 40
dollars
That's why they provide a free media player - it probably hides the fact that the downloads are coming from bittorrent or whereever.This also explains why they are not an illegal service as they are not providing the downloads themselves.
- Original Message -
From: Deanna Schneider
To:
From this site:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?T60D45189
A post by one of the owners
--
Hello,
I am part owner of thedownloadplace.com. We have invested large amounts
of time, energy, and money to ensure that our members receive the most
up-to-date information on the
Congratulations to the any Houston Astros fans on the list.Welcome to
your first Championship Series.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
http://www.jambuddy.net/
Cheers,
Erika
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Hello,
I am part owner of thebreathingplace.com. We have invested large amounts
of time, energy, and money to ensure that our members receive the most
up-to-date information on the current status of the breathing
phenomenon.
We take pride in knowing that we have helped many people learn all the
Talk about backwards.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/11/saudi.women.ap/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/11/saudi.women.ap/index.html
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Hi All,
So please help me clarify something:
1.) you're saying that the Jews, who had no country at the time, were
at war with the British and so bombing a hotel that was being used as
a base by the British is just fine.What was the British/Jewish war
called?
2.) The killing of British soldiers
From CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/12/iraq.main/index.html
U.N. watchdog agency: Nuclear materials gone
Equipment and materials that could be used to make nuclear weapons
have disappeared from Iraq, warns the chief of the U.N. atomic
watchdog agency.
Satellite imagery shows entire
That is so true!
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 23:12:16 -0500, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.kontraband.com/show/show.asp?ID=1627
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Here's the full story:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/11/iraq.nuclear/index.html
Nuclear materials 'vanish' in Iraq
UNITED NATIONS (CNN) -- Equipment and materials that could be used to
make nuclear weapons have disappeared from Iraq, the chief of the
U.N.'s atomic watchdog agency has
His birthday was coming up and he thought this was a
good time to tell his mother what he wanted. Mom, I want a bike for my
birthday.
Little Leroy was a bit of a troublemaker. He had
gotten into trouble at school and at home. Leroy's mother asked him if he
thought he deserved to get a bike for
Larry,
Please reconcile this article with all of the other documents that you have
provided this list showing that it has been proven that Iraq had neither a
nuclear weapons program or the ability to produce them and that this was well
know before the war.
Either it wasn't a concern then and now
BREAKING NEWS
Supreme Court to consider constitutionality of Ten Commandments
displays on government land and buildings.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
G wrote:
Attacks on US soldiers aren't terrorism...ok. What about the
kidnapping and beheading of foreign journalists and civilians? What
about car bombs exploding at IRAQI police stations? Bombs exploding in
shopping centers, killing women, children?
That is terrorism.
These freedom
Dinowitzs, During the British-Jewish war, if it was fine for the Irgun
to attack to an administrative and military target via the call-ahead
rule, what were the targets the British could counter-attack against?
Who was the Jewish military and where were their bases?
To me, that was terrorism,
ther eis a difference between weapons and weaponized fissile
materials, and nuclear materials. It has never been disputed that Iraq
had a research program and a couple of nuclear reactors. What has been
stolen was the materials and equipment in those research facilities.
larry
On Tue, 12 Oct
I'm just wondering if you consider the insurgency attacks in Iraq to be justified?
Are they only justified when they kill US soldiers?
- Original Message -
From: Jochem van Dieten
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: The politicization of the Iraq War
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not consider those that attack a military force that occupies their country terrorists.
Exactly, and the Dinowitzs just made an argument in agreement.
They said that the Irgun was due the land the British were occupying,
so
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just wondering if you consider the insurgency attacks in Iraq to be justified?
To be clear, I have 2 points:
1.) Anytime somebody violently attacks someone else to accomplish a
political objective, it's terrorism unless it's self defense.So
G wrote:
I'm just wondering if you consider the insurgency attacks in Iraq to
be justified?
No.
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Actually, I was talking about Arab hatred towards Israel when I made my post that you were referring to, not necessarily the US. I agree with your assertion that the modern reason for Arab dislike of the US is our direct support of Israel. So while such widespread dislike of the US among Arabs may
Gruss,
I think this definition waters down the more traditional definition which I
thought included targeting civilians to create terror and weaken the will of
the other party to fight.For example, one could argue that Iraq insurgences
aren't being terrorists when they blow up a US Humvee.And
Gruss Gott wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Jochem van Dieten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please remove my email address when you quote me, the archives are public.
I do not consider those that attack a military force that occupies
their country terrorists.
Exactly, and the Dinowitzs just made an
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:07:38 -0400, Larry C. Lyons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its an interesting wrinkle in a region whose history includes
occupation/participation by every major culture.
Yeah, that time they were occupied by Japan was really a mess. :-)
-Kevin
[Todays Threads]
[This
OK its definately before lunch and I'm still not entirely awake. How
about every major western culture, sorry about the slip.
larry
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:36:33 -0500, Kevin Graeme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:07:38 -0400, Larry C. Lyons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its an
Gruss Gott wrote:
1.) Anytime somebody violently attacks someone else to accomplish a
political objective, it's terrorism unless it's self defense.
Was the invasion in Iraq self defense?
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is ridiculous. What would you of had him do, Angel? Completely ignore
his generals?
The we just do what the Generals tell us to is misleading.The
civilians in the Pentagon and Whitehouse set policy and the military
Generals execute on it.
Do you know how hard it is to keep Sushi fresh in a desert region?Don't get
me started!g
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:37 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The politicization of the Iraq War
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:07:38
Isn't that one of the key elements of the debate on the War?The other being
timing?
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:45 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The politicization of the Iraq War
Gruss Gott wrote:
1.)
just a quibble, but Shinseki wasn't fired. He retired on schedule
after his appointment wasn't renewed.
larry
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:44:01 -0500, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is ridiculous. What would you of had him do, Angel?
I think the winner/loser slant is really what defines terrorism.
Afterall, George Washington and his army fighting for self defense,
their motive was purely political.They didn't stick to fighting the
traditional/British way but chose to adopt Indian strategies.If we
accept Gruss's definition, we
It's funny, but only in the last few years have the methods of the
Minutemen and other American revolution fighters been referred to as
terrorism. Prior to this it was generally called guerilla warfare. I
think that's still a more accurate description of the methods because
of the targets
G wrote:
In a nutshell, I'm not sure there is anything Israel could do to satisfy a
group of people who's stated mission is the destruction of the jewish state.
Maybe not those people, but the Palestinians in general, during the
90s, supported the land deals that Mr. Arafat was negotiating with
Gruss,
Please visit factcheck.orgYou are just repeating incorrect Kerry statements.
Shineski announced his retirement long before the war:
Kerry claimed, as he had in the first debate, that the Army's Chief of Staff,
Gen. Eric K. Shinseki, was forced to retire for saying before the invasion of
In a nutshell, I'm not sure there is anything Israel could do to satisfy a group of people who's stated mission is the destruction of the jewish state.
Thank you, G! : )
Judith
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Judith wrote:
In a nutshell, I'm not sure there is anything Israel could do to satisfy a
group of people who's stated mission is the destruction of the jewish state.
Thank you, G! : )
Judith, do you really believe the average Palestinian believed this 5 years ago?
I doubt it.The world, mostly
Jochem wrote:
Was the invasion in Iraq self defense?
Good question ... I would say both depending on priorities.The arguments are:
1.) Yes.Mr. Hussein was terrorizing his people and may have had
WMD.That is, we were defending Iraqis and the US as well as the
world.
2.) No.The globally accepted
Andy wrote:
Shineski announced his retirement long before the war.
I don't need to check any of those sources - I heard it from Gen
Shinseki.Obviously you would agree, based on that logic, that
General Wesley Clark retired rather than having been fired?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
At the same time however, the so called patiots saw nothing wrong with
burning the homes of loyalists and effectively running ethnic
cleansing campaign against them. For instance one North Carolina
county make any loyalist resident liable for any robberies, thefts etc
that occured in the county.
This is very true, and I think some parrellels can be drawn between these occurrences, and what is going on in Iraq. Insurgents are killing Iraqi citizens who are aiding the Americans. This seems awfully similar to early US patriots terrorizing loyalists.
If your cause is the correct one, then
how about scolarships? any sponsors want to send a poor cf coder to MAX?
LOL...
ok, back to the books
steph
For those that remember the last Community Suite, we had about 15 feet
of books. This year, we'd like to have that and more.
(Yes, the Community Suite is happening. Yes, we're
--- Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
So please help me clarify something:
1.) you're saying that the Jews, who had no country
at the time, were
at war with the British and so bombing a hotel that
was being used as
a base by the British is just fine.What was the
Now, now.I'm sure your skills are better than poor.
:-)
--Ben
Stephenie Hamilton wrote:
how about scolarships? any sponsors want to send a poor cf coder to MAX?
LOL...
ok, back to the books
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations
Turns out that Bush does own a timber company.He and Cheney seem to
be having senior moments lately
http://www.factcheck.org/article275.html
--
Marlon
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
--- Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe not those people, but the Palestinians in
general, during the
90s, supported the land deals that Mr. Arafat was
negotiating with Mr.
Clinton.From what I've seen the deal was as good
as done and the
Palestinians supported it which is why there
Gruss,
Just looked at your photo. It's how I pictured you.
Your a pisser, stand tall and take no shit :)
http://www.houseoffusion.com/users/view.cfm/recordid=392
--- Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The we just do what the Generals tell us to is
misleading.The
civilians in the Pentagon
powerball was up to 280 million and I forgot to buy a ticket :) Waaa.
Dana
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:46:48 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what my mom died of.Go buy a lottery ticket.You are very lucky.
And we are glad that you were.
Andy
-Original Message-
yeah yeah yeah I am talking to myself now.
But now that I think about it, Sam Kerry's plan is to extend to
uninsured Americans the same health care plan that members of Congress
have, correct? It might have worked out as well.
I think the key factor in my case was the willingness and
Ya, one side of my family was driven out of Massachussets after the revolution.
But it's an interesting topic. In my opinion you cannot call people
attacking foreign soldiers terrorists, whereas people who attack
civilians probably qualify. The lines get very fuzzy though when you
have
Sam wrote:
There was no peace.
Good work, but how many suicide bombings were there?Most of the
statistics you've reported are less than 3 summer months in Chicago,
but that's just a guess.A better metric of peace would be to look at
business transactions between the Israelis and the
Must be nice to have so many assets you lose track of them. And
naturally this has *nothing* to do with recent decisions about logging
in wilderness areas. I dunno about you guys, but I live in New Mexico
for the access to the wilderness and I don't want to hear buzzsaws
when I go.
Reminds me of
I think that sort of thing is not called for. Lay off the personal insults.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:52:46 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gruss,
Just looked at your photo. It's how I pictured you.
Your a pisser, stand tall and take no shit :)
Maybe I read it wrong but I took this as a sort of wry compliment? I
mean... have you looked at the picture?
Dana
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:37:43 -0400, Larry C. Lyons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that sort of thing is not called for. Lay off the personal insults.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004
at the time of the revolutionary war, about 1/3rd supported the
loyalists and about the same number supported the continental
congress, the other third just tried to stay out of way of both sides.
>From what I've rad about the time, while there were some incidents on
the other side (notably in New
Actually, that was funny if in fact Gruss posted that picture on the HOF site.
(Much less so if someone else posted it for him)
Jerry Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/12/04 02:37PM
I think that sort of thing is not called for. Lay off the personal insults.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:52:46 -0700
I am totally confused by your logic.First I wasn't aware that you had a
personal relationship with Shinseki.Please ask him to reconcilethe
announcement of his retirement (yes, he could have been asked to retire) long
before the war, and being fired for arguing about proper staffing levels on a
I think he posted it in the course of the discussion of French vs
English WC's when Marlon got back from England.
Dana
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:47:34 -0400, Jerry Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, that was funny if in fact Gruss posted that picture on the HOF
site.
(Much less so if
Larry,
I took this as a complement.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 1:38 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush's telling Non Answer.
I think that sort of thing is not called for. Lay off the personal insults.
On Tue,
I'm not sure that having a small share in a timber company is the same as owning that company. Do you consider yourself the owner of every company in which you own some percentage of stock?
Also, unless i've been misled, isn't Kerry the one who is quite a bit more well off financially than Bush?
Whats a site to check out?
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:32:29 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
A email exchange I just had reminded me of the importance of letting our
troops know how much we appreciate the sacrifices they are making.While we
disagree on many points, I think
welp according to the factcheck article, Kerry didn't claim Bush owned
it... he said that he earned $84 from ownership in it, a distinction
that should be clear to anyone familiar with the concept of stocks. It
was Bush who said I own a timber company? I did not see this
particular bit of the
The original point of Kerry's statement was in regard to loopholes.Because Bush was a minority owner of that lumber company he could, under the laws initiated by the Bush administration, be considered a small business owner.
Howie
- Original Message -
From: G
To: CF-Community
Sent:
I didn't put the photo there, I was just making a joke
about it.
--- Larry C. Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that sort of thing is not called for. Lay
off the personal insults.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:52:46 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gruss,
Just looked
I agree that the target of the violence is a huge factor in determining terrorism.
I don't agree though, that you can make a clean break in the case of Iraq. The groups that are attacking the US are the same groups that are killing Iraqi civilians, beheading journalists, and blowing up police
I was looking into the definitions when I was first getting my
business license. You'd be astounded at who is considered a small
business. I seem to remember that Dell or some other national computer
company still qualifies.
Dana
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:57:12 -0400, Howie Hamlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think Gruss did
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:01:33 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't put the photo there, I was just making a joke
about it.
--- Larry C. Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that sort of thing is not called for. Lay
off the personal insults.
do we know this for a fact? Not trying to start a flame here, but...
isn't the consensus that our intelligence in this area really sucks?
Dana
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:02:02 -0500, G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that the target of the violence is a huge factor in determining
terrorism.
I
HmmmI thought it was a pretty funny joke.I don't think it was
intended as an attack.
Another case of over-sensitivity, IMO.
Ray
At 03:03 PM 10/12/2004, you wrote:
I think Gruss did
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:01:33 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't put the photo
On a completely different note, here are the lyrics to that song
that's been running through my head...yes, it's kinda sarcastic, but
then, so am I :)
Eels - Goddam Right It's a Beautiful Day
Artists Eels Goddam Right It's a Beautiful Day
Contribution by: sammy4770 on July 04, 2004
The
At 13:51 10/12/2004 -0500, you wrote:
I'm not sure that having a small share in a timber company is the same as
owning that company. Do you consider yourself the owner of every
company in which you own some percentage of stock?
You should, that is what equity is.You own a piece of that company.
And, a lot of large businesses pay little or no taxes.
Yehaa!
- Original Message -
From: dana tierney
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: I own a timber company?
I was looking into the definitions when I was first getting my
business license. You'd be
Does George Soros really believe Kerry will sign the
Kyoto treaty and the International Criminal Court in
The Hague? And why is he gambling millions that Kerry
will?
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=7231
In reply to my second question, about how he would
fight terrorism, Mr. Soros
At 15:07 10/12/2004 -0400, you wrote:
And, a lot of large businesses pay little or no taxes.
Yehaa!
That isn't really true.If company A and company B were the same exact
companies that did the same exact business but the only difference is that
A is a publicly traded company and B is a limited
lol nothing like tweaking u2's stuff
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:06:41 -0600, dana tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a completely different note, here are the lyrics to that song
that's been running through my head...yes, it's kinda sarcastic, but
then, so am I :)
Eels - Goddam Right It's a
George Soros has nothing to do with the Kerry campaign except for donations.His opinion makes no difference.
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 3:13 PM
Subject: Kerry's number 1 supporter.
Does George Soros really believe Kerry will
Huh?There are lots of large companies that pay little or no taxes - it's a fact.
- Original Message -
From: Won Lee
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: I own a timber company?
At 15:07 10/12/2004 -0400, you wrote:
And, a lot of large businesses pay
At 12:13 10/12/2004 -0700, you wrote:
Does George Soros really believe Kerry will sign the
Kyoto treaty and the International Criminal Court in
The Hague? And why is he gambling millions that Kerry
will?
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=7231
In reply to my second question, about
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
