I think they are just passing around the one Cheney used to fake having a
heart with...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 1:23 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: George W. Bush undergoes heart surgery for blocked artery
Heh, from Fark:
Blockage -- possibly Dick Cheney -- found in George W. Bush's heart
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
I think they are just passing around the one Cheney used to fake having a
heart with...
-Original Message-
LOL
-Original Message-
From: GMoney [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 2:42 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush undergoes heart surgery for blocked artery
Heh, from Fark:
Blockage -- possibly Dick Cheney -- found in George W. Bush's heart
On Tue
They don't put stents in hearts, they put them in arteries. All this
proves is that he has arteries.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
At 15:29 6/30/2004 -0600, you wrote:
you forgot to mention that the terms of Cheney's retirement mean that
he is still getting payments from Halliburton as we speak. It simply
stretches my credulity to consider the proposition that he does not
have a vested interest in Halliburton profits.
But to
]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:39 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
At 15:29 6/30/2004 -0600, you wrote:
you forgot to mention that the terms of Cheney's retirement mean that
he is still getting payments from Halliburton as we speak. It simply
stretches my
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:43 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
won.
to me that's the point of a conspiracy theory.they are usually
bumbling events of a somewhat related order that if pieced together,
with a bit of hope, really sound almost
Well, it has come to light that intelligence in that part of the word seems
to have been something a bit less than good.
snip A quick air strike along with some gooditelligence /snip
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:39 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
At 15:29 6/30/2004 -0600, you wrote:
you forgot to mention that the terms of Cheney's retirement mean that
he is still getting payments from Halliburton as we speak
At 08:38 AM 7/1/04, Won wrote:
This does constitute a financial relationship, but I fail to see how Cheney
really benefits if HAL makes more money.
Cheney owns stock in HAL.It's in a blind trust, which means he doesn't
vote on it, or control buying or selling.However, as HAL makes money, the
.
The leaders of this administration just aren't very good politicians.
Jim Davis
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 9:04 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
Lets not forget that there is one big wrinkle in this scenario. KBR
Um, halliburton makes money, the stock goes up, no? And yes, it is
deferred compensation, but it is being paid in stock, correct?
Dana
This does constitute a financial relationship, but I fail to see how Cheney
really benefits if HAL makes more money
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
thank you, Maureen. What she said.:)
- Original Message -
From: Maureen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:15:46 -0400
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:38 AM 7/1/04, Won wrote:
This does constitute a financial relationship
At 10:10 7/1/2004 -0400, you wrote:
My only comment on that (besides that I do agree with Larry - there simply
aren't that many firms that could do the work) is to say: why bother, then
with making no-bid contracts?Why change the process?
The only other American companies that could handle this
At 10:02 7/1/2004 -0600, you wrote:
Um, halliburton makes money, the stock goes up, no? And yes, it is
deferred compensation, but it is being paid in stock, correct?
Deferred compensation is to be paid in cash.But that doesn't mean that
the deal can't be restructed at a latter date.
And he has
erm, sorry, I missed something there. If he has stock options and the
stock goes up he does not make any money because why again?
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Won Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:17:23 -0400
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
To: CF
so why not put it up for bid and formalize that? It's unnecessary bad PR.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Won Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:05:58 -0400
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:10 7/1/2004 -0400, you wrote
So the problem with the company is how he obtained the contract/business?
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:22 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
so why not put it up for bid and formalize
That would be smart move unless you KNEW that the stock was going to go up because you, personally, could guarantee unlimited no-bid contracts to ensure corporate health.
I'd love to see what his actual standings are, and wether or not he really donated all of it to charity as he claims.
Jerry
Message -
From: Monique Boea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:22:59 -0400
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So the problem with the company is how he obtained the contract/business?
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto
At 12:22 7/1/2004 -0400, you wrote:
So the problem with the company is how he obtained the contract/business?
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:22 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
so why
+1
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:30:47 -0400
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would be smart move unless you KNEW that the stock was going to
go up because you, personally, could
emails to your friends!
-- dont mistake my perfection as arrogance
anonymous
-Original Message-
From: Won Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:39 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
At 12:22 7/1/2004 -0400, you wrote:
So the problem
that wasn't necessarily to you...
Just a general question regarding Halliburton
-Original Message-
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:35 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
I'm not sure I understand
ok. I do think the pay package looks very bad though and given the
track record of this administration... if it looks bad it is probably
really worse.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Won Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:38:48 -0400
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great
if there were a competitive bidding process the whole thing would
stink a lot less.
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Tony Weeg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:37:57 -0400
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
well who is to say
well who is to say that any other competitive contractor
wouldn't have had ties to someone in the administration, god
forbid a democrat tie?
C'mon Tony, if it would have happened to someone else we'd be having the
same conversation.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast
Exactly, at that level some high ranking political figure will have a
relationship from some super-mega corp executive.I just don't think it's
fair to think someone is guilty just because they have a
relationship.Now, to misuse that relationship is the cause for concern.
[Todays Threads]
, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 12:55 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
well who is to say that any other competitive contractor
wouldn't have had ties to someone in the administration, god
forbid a democrat tie?
C'mon Tony
Yes there was too much possibility of corrpution the way it was set
up. If the contracts had been put out to bid and the KBR-H offer may
have been a low bidder, the fact that it was a no-bid contract does
raise a lot of suspicions. I think in this case Cheney should have
been like Caesar's wife in
Now, to misuse that relationship is the cause for concern.
This is exactly what we are talking about! Hello!!!
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
At 13:17 7/1/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Yes there was too much possibility of corrpution the way it was set
up. If the contracts had been put out to bid and the KBR-H offer may
have been a low bidder, the fact that it was a no-bid contract does
raise a lot of suspicions. I think in this case Cheney
At 13:24 7/1/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Now, to misuse that relationship is the cause for concern.
This is exactly what we are talking about! Hello!!!
Yes I agree with you.There is enough coincidences and oddities that the
Halliburton - Cheney relationship should be investigated.My point is that
The purpose of competitive bidding is to force the companies to give their
best price, not to determine qualification.The companies would have to be
qualified before being allowed to bid.By not requiring the bidding,
Halliburton was allowed to charge whatever they wanted to charge, which we
At 12:37 PM 7/1/04, Tony wrote:
well who is to say that any other competitive contractor wouldn't have
had ties to someone in the administration, god forbid a democrat tie?
Cheney is not 'someone in the administration', he is the Vice President,
and in many instances the de facto president.He
especially when they refuse to disclose that relationship :) See the
recent Supreme Court decision on the energy commission.
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:52:53 -0400, Won Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly, at that level some high ranking political figure will have a
relationship from some
well ya, and if the dealings were transparent and open to examination
hey, perhaps some respected journalist could have a look and decide it
really is on the up and up. As it is, there is not enough information.
You can say that there is not enough information therefore there is no
evidence, or
um, no it would not be a waste of time. The secrecy surrounding it is
a very big red flag. If in fact there is nothing wrong there, why hide
it?
Dana
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:32:13 -0400, Won Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 13:24 7/1/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Now, to misuse that relationship is
yeah but doesnt putting the contract through a formal identifiable bid
process bring the whole thing out into the open, including the
criteria for being a qualified bidder?
Dana
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:33:34 -0400, Maureen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The purpose of competitive bidding is to force
Yes.If you want to see the information on the whole bidding process, go
tohttp://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/06.htm
The Halliburton contracts were awarded under section 6.302 -- Circumstances
Permitting Other Than Full and Open Competition, although it the
Jul 2004 23:07:16 -0400
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes.If you want to see the information on the whole bidding process, go
tohttp://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/06.htm
The Halliburton contracts were awarded
The main problem with the moral argument is that it's not applied evenly.
Yes, Iraq may be better off now, but the moral high-ground was not the
launching point of the war: there are perhaps dozens of places that have it
just as bad or worse and we do little or nothing there.
Moral reasoning may
, June 30, 2004 2:21 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
The main problem with the moral argument is that it's not applied
evenly.
Yes, Iraq may be better off now, but the moral high-ground was not the
launching point of the war: there are perhaps dozens of places
I agree with you 110%
(I'm baaack...CFMX launch complete)
ive resisted as long as I could.
do you really think that saddam hussein, and his cronies would have ever
concieved of a democratic iraq where peoples hopes and dreams and
freedoms could
be expressed through the many various media that
Almost.We went into Iraq to oust Saddam /because/ he had undeclared
weapons of mass destruction.The whole oppression of his entire counry
came up in side notes, but it was those 25,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000
liters of botulinum, 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX gas, not to
mention that
to your friends!
-- dont mistake my perfection as arrogance
anonymous
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:25 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
Almost.We went into Iraq to oust Saddam /because
]
410.548.2337
visit www.antiwrap.com to send long url emails to your friends!
-- dont mistake my perfection as arrogance
anonymous
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:25 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great
Few points to ponder
We have the most elite armed forces in the world, surely we could have sent
a team or teams into take out Saddam instead of announcing our arrival.
H, what a great idea, spare thousands of lives.
Cheney and Halliburton, enough said; how crooked can you get?
WMDs,
so, what ur saying is that the world, the iraqi people, and
the middle east specifically would have been better off with
him in power?
No, not at all. We would be better off not having leveled the country and
not having gone into the War alone If at all, especially under
absolutely
www.antiwrap.com to send long url emails to your friends!
-- dont mistake my perfection as arrogance
anonymous
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:51 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
so, what
]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:58 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
great.but its too late for that.
lets pick up the pieces, unify ourselves, and stand behind our
president.naysayers are not helping any more than the freakin
insurgents.
...tony
tony weeg
senior
Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:58 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
great.but its too late for that.
lets pick up the pieces, unify ourselves, and stand behind our
president.naysayers are not helping any more
cf_naysay
bullshit.lets pick up the pieces, starting with this
piece of shite and throw him out of office in november. Id
rather stand behind our troops and support them than that
corrupted scatmaster.;-) /cf_naysay
AWESOME! Take that Tony, you... You... You... Bay area republiacn
-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:25 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
Almost.We went into Iraq to oust Saddam /because/ he had undeclared
weapons of mass destruction.The whole oppression of his entire counry
came
anonymous
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:51 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
so, what ur saying is that the world, the iraqi people, and
the middle east specifically would have
Why would we stand behind our president if we think he is an idiot?
He (and his handlers) could not possibly have done any worse in the handling of Iraq, or of anything since 9/11.
He and his administration have got just about everything exactly wrong.
(Now, I will admit batting 1000 is
-
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:17 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
cf_naysay
bullshit.lets pick up the pieces, starting with this
piece of shite and throw him out of office in november. Id
rather
as arrogance
anonymous
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:51 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
so, what ur saying is that the world, the iraqi people, and
the middle east
-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
I think he's saying that the Iraqi people should have done it, and not
have it imposed by outsiders.
larry
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:28:09 -0400, Tony Weeg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so, what ur saying is that the world, the iraqi people
there is no other solution
he needed to be stopped
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:16 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
so how would you have fixed the situation?
see if little saddam-ie
There are people who are in 100% support of what he is doing though.
The only way we can do anything is to vote
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:20 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
I've got a better solution.Let's pick up the pieces, unify
ourselves, and vote the president out in November.
Marlon
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:57:50 -0400, Tony Weeg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
great.but its too late for that.
lets pick up the pieces, unify ourselves, and stand behind our
'Cmon. Nobody bit on that troll? Yeesh. Slow day.
Jerry Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/30/04 11:20AM
Why would we stand behind our president if we think he is an idiot?
He (and his handlers) could not possibly have done any worse in the handling of Iraq, or of anything since 9/11.
He and his
www.antiwrap.com to send long url emails to your friends!
-- dont mistake my perfection as arrogance
anonymous
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:27 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
I've got
there is no other solution
Look harder. To say there was/is no other solution is outlandish. I can
think of many alternative solutions than the one we (US) took.
So, I hope that was some kind of joke...
Mike
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User
-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:20 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
In business you fire those who cannot do the job. You also fire those
who deliberatley mislead shareholders and other stakeholders.Are you
anonymous
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:27 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
I've got a better solution.Let's pick up the pieces, unify
ourselves, and vote the president out in November
:16 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
so how would you have fixed the situation?
see if little saddam-ie poo would play nice, and remove his cloak of
nuclear/chemical/biological weapon secrecy, start treating women with
respect and make things nice
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:16 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
so how would you have fixed the situation?
see if little saddam-ie poo would play nice, and remove his cloak of
nuclear/chemical/biological weapon secrecy, start
-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
I've got a better solution.Let's pick up the pieces, unify
ourselves, and vote the president out in November.
Marlon
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:57:50 -0400, Tony Weeg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
great.but its too late for that.
lets pick up
At 11:50 6/30/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Gore why not? At least he had some intelligence, and is not an
ex-alcoholic coke head.
Personally, I think Gore is less fit to lead this country then Bush.He
doesn't have the respect of his own party.His backing of Dean was
considered a political maneuver to
: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
so how would you have fixed the situation?
see if little saddam-ie poo would play nice, and remove his cloak of
nuclear/chemical/biological weapon secrecy, start treating women with
respect and make things nice for the iraqi people?
if you don't like what
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
Oh, I would have had Saddam killed, assassinated, as well as his family.
Then I would have supported an independent kurdish state
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
sounds like some fun, but just as freakin crazy too!!
...tony
tony weeg
senior web applications architect
navtrak, inc.
www.navtrak.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
410.548.2337
visit
on anything and would form their own, lesser
countries.
That's about it.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:16 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
so how would you have fixed the situation?
see
LOL
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
sounds like some fun, but just as freakin crazy too!!
...tony
tony weeg
senior web applications architect
navtrak
May be a dumb question...but how much of our oil comes from Iraq?
Or the world's oil?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
sounds like some fun, but just
as arrogance
anonymous
-Original Message-
From: Monique Boea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:25 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
May be a dumb question...but how much of our oil comes from Iraq?
Or the world's oil?
-Original
and arrogance of the war into sharp relief: look at the
freedom we've given those people and pity us for the corrupted and lost
people we've become to obtain it.
Jim Davis
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 8:59 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush
At 12:25 6/30/2004 -0400, you wrote:
May be a dumb question...but how much of our oil comes from Iraq?
Or the world's oil?
Right now?About 0.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
the other Shiites in Iran.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:25 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: George W. Bush, a great president
Except that independent Kurdish state would also destabilize Turkey, as
there's no way
: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
Oh, I would have had Saddam killed, assassinated, as well as his family.
Then I would have supported an independent kurdish state that would have
destabilized the whole region. This would have allied me close with India
because Pakistan would have been pissed
: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:58 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
great.but its too late for that.
lets pick up the pieces, unify ourselves, and stand behind our
president.naysayers are not helping any more than the freakin
insurgents.
[Todays Threads
What exactly was this?
the one Haliburton no-bid thing
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:25 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
yeah, I know it's crazy but stranger things have happened
that shows the imports to the US but where does it come from?
(Or am I missing it)
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:26 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
where does our oil come from?
check
I just googled and got this.
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/nation/6881945.htm?1c
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/nation/6881945.htm?1c
-Original Message-
From: Monique Boea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:39 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush
At 12:38 6/30/2004 -0400, you wrote:
What exactly was this?
the one Haliburton no-bid thing
The proper protocol to win military contracts is to submit a competitive
bid detailing what you will do and for how much. Halliburton secured the
contract without a competitive bid.People go to jail for
Didn't they try that after Gulf 1?
Didn't seem to work out that well for them then...
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
I think he's saying that the Iraqi people should have done it, and not
have it imposed by outsiders.
--
will
If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be
PS all my info on the contract comes from 4 sources: Wall St Journal,
Bloomberg Radio, CNBC, and USA Today.
So take it for what it's worth.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
star telegram?
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:46 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
I just googled and got this.
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/nation/6881945.htm?1c
http://www.dfw.com
We didn't go in to free the Iraqi people; we went in to oust Saddam.
There
is a subtle, but important difference there.
Isn't that the same thing?
Tyler
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.711 / Virus Database:
here, here! well spoken, Bruce!
The very concept of standing behind the president is un-American.
No: the president (and all of our elected officials) are to be watched
with
the utmost vigilance to ensure that they, with us, stand behind the ideals
of this country.
will
If my life
I find it very interesting how the justification for the
invasion/liberation of Iraq has morphed from grave and growing
threat to disapproval of the way Hussein ran the country.
IMHO, the acceptable grounds for military action do not include
disapproval or various forms of it would be better done
?
Or the world's oil?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
sounds like some fun, but just as freakin crazy too!!
...tony
tony weeg
senior web
, vendetta, greed,
and misplaced patriotism based on deceit).
Jim Davis
From: Tyler Silcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:48 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: George W. Bush, a great president
We didn't go in to free the Iraqi people; we went in to oust Saddam
You're joking right?
the one Haliburton thing is a bit of an understatement.
Halliburton won several no-bid contracts to do things for the Armed
Forces and for the government in general in the Iraq conflict
They feed and support the troops in the combat zones.
They provide (transport) fuel to
A short bit to add to this, immediately before Cheney was VP he was a
senior VP for Halliburton. While he cannot benefit from his
Halliburton stock or other options during his tenure as VPUS, since
the Iraq war, he's made several million in delayed bonuses, stock
increases etc.
larry
On Wed, 30
Forgot to add that there was a recent issue with that no-bid contract
in that there were several emails from the officer who was the
contracts officer thanking the Vice President's office for expediting
the contract with Halliburton.
larry
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:53:56 -0400, Won Lee [EMAIL
subversive lib'ral rags all!
;-)
'specially that Wall Street Journal...damned hippy peaceniks!
Won Lee wrote:
PS all my info on the contract comes from 4 sources: Wall St Journal,
Bloomberg Radio, CNBC, and USA Today.
So take it for what it's worth.
--
will
If my life weren't funny, it
At 10:19 6/30/2004 -0700, you wrote:
subversive lib'ral rags all!
;-)
'specially that Wall Street Journal...damned hippy peaceniks!
I find the investigating and reporting in the WSJ to be great.I
especially like the art, it can even dull the avarice of Dennis Kozolwski.
Their op-ed are a bit
1 - 100 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
