Hi Mark,
Good afternoon to you.
I don't know how to answer that at this point, as I have only run a couple
samples waiting for F2B3 to be released before delving into Flex seriously.
However, I think I would opt for writing different data access components
for Flex connectivity.
On 5/9/06, mar
Andy Allan wrote:
> Our Development/Staging/QA/whatever-you-want-to-call-it mirrors
> Production exactly.
>
> CF settings, JVM settings, OS settings, Apache settings. It has to.
> (OK you can get away with the odd discrepency).
>
> Now true, we won't have external users hitting this environment,
Hey jeff,
Think databaseBlocks.cfc could be tied into Flex? Good morning to you!
Mark Fuqua
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Fleitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 9:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
The info you are looking at regarding
server) are
> allowed access to the website files. On Windows you might use shares for
> this.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:14 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
>
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Windows on desktop only. Shares? For what?
Andy
On 09/05/06, Plunkett, Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really? I presume you are not using Windows then? Or do you not u
t; To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
>
> Our Development/Staging/QA/whatever-you-want-to-call-it mirrors Production
> exactly.
>
> CF settings, JVM settings, OS settings, Apache settings. It has to.
> (OK you can get away with the odd discrepency).
>
Really? I presume you are not using Windows then? Or do you not use shares?
-Original Message-
From: Andy Allan
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 7:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Our Development/Staging/QA/whatever-you-want-to-call-it mirrors Production
exactly
Well your not the norm then Andy, most developers do not have that setup.
Snake
-Original Message-
From: Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 May 2006 00:11
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Our Development/Staging/QA/whatever-you-want-to-call-it mirrors
in things.
> Aside from CF there are of course the windows/IIS configuration differences,
> the security policies...
>
> The difference is night and day
>
> Russ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 May 2006 1
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 May 2006 19:14
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Snake wrote:
> Like everything.
> There is a big difference to hosting a production server with hundreds
> of sites on it and mi
Snake wrote:
> Like everything.
> There is a big difference to hosting a production server with hundreds of
> sites on it and millions of hits per day and running a development server
> with 1 developer on it and no traffic.
There is indeed a big difference in what you must do (like make
backups)
P.Net book for CF programmer
On 5/8/06, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I have to agree - I still think CF5 was more stable that MX. Java
> certainly did add a few more oddities in terms of stability which
> needs far more tweaking of the JVM.
Oddly,
On 5/8/06, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I have to agree - I still think CF5 was more stable that MX. Java
> certainly did add a few more oddities in terms of stability which needs
> far
> more tweaking of the JVM.
Oddly, 6.1 did much better for us, and 7 has been eve
-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Yep...no problem...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 4:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
You develop directly on your live server !! :-O !!!
Do I r
Yep...no problem...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 4:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
You develop directly on your live server !! :-O !!!
Do I really need to say anything?
Snake
You develop directly on your live server !! :-O !!!
Do I really need to say anything?
Snake
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 May 2006 00:48
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Sounds like you got things set up well
JVM.
An error on CF5 was a lot easier to diagnose too, whereas you have to know
somehting about JAVA to decipher a JVM stacktrace.
Snake
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 May 2006 22:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
y 07, 2006 6:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> > You gotta swim at some point.
>
> Agreed...I'm just trying to decide what pool to swim
> in this time.
I hear you. In a changing world, assessing what the future
will bring is not as straight for
> Life is too short.
Without a doubt...
-Original Message-
From: Denny Valliant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 2:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
~|
Message: h
> > You gotta swim at some point.
>
> Agreed...I'm just trying to decide what pool to swim
> in this time.
I hear you. In a changing world, assessing what the future
will bring is not as straight forward as one would wish. =-]
I think it would be wise to add ASP.NET to my repertoire.
> Especial
2006 20:06
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Snake wrote:
> Well I guess for most CFML developers in a full-time job, the server
> side of things is not their problem, they just do the code. But if
> your self employed/freelance, and have to look after your own serv
Snake wrote:
> Well I guess for most CFML developers in a full-time job, the server side of
> things is not their problem, they just do the code. But if your self
> employed/freelance, and have to look after your own server and maybe even do
> the hosting as well, there is certainly a shedload mor
On 5/7/06, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would have to agree with that...doing this all without any
> guidance or training (except from a little tech support and
> a lot of CF-Talk guidance!) has been a challenge at times.
No doubt. Customer support, sales, doing the whole thin
essage-
From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 6:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Well I guess for most CFML developers in a full-time job, the server side of
things is not their problem, they just do the code. But if your self
em
> What's the criteria for being a loyal customer? Buying
> something every time they have something to sell whether it
> benefits me or not?
>
> Every time, which has been once, that I needed a means to
> produce dynamic websites and applications, I turned to
> Allaire > Macromedia > Adobe fo
ting becomes less risky.
I gotta ask... 'leetness? What in the world does that mean?
And where in this world is home for you?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Denny Valliant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 11:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF pr
to
maintain a stable server.
Snake
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 May 2006 00:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
And that's one of the major concerns I had about upgrading.
After CF became JAVA based (if that'
> I finally had a stable CF system and was really afraid to touch it,
> being a one server business. I didn't have multiple servers as I do now,
> and couldn't afford for something to go wrong.
>
> The water got a little too deep for comfort.
You gotta swim at some point.
And you also need to g
On 5/6/06, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the perspective, Denny.
Hey, anytime. It's about all I got, so... [-=
I've haven't tried talking with Adobe about it, but should
> I decide to upgrade, I'll certainly talk to them.
>
> As far as the changes from 4.5 to the curr
le too deep for comfort.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 7:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Altho, all things considered with the improvements CFMX brings, I still find
CF5 more stable than CFMX. The inc
was a lot easier to diagnose too, whereas you have to know
somehting about JAVA to decipher a JVM stacktrace.
Snake
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 May 2006 22:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Thanks for the perspective
veryone for sharing your thoughts.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Denny Valliant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 4:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Out of curiosity, has anyone called adobe and tried the old human element?
I only dealt
aturday, May 06, 2006 3:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Interesting concept, but you would have to wait 10 years to find out they
are a loyal customer though.
In the case of big corporates like Adobe, a loyal and worthy customer is
someone who spends shedloads of
Out of curiosity, has anyone called adobe and tried the old human element?
I only dealt with MM via email, but they were pretty helpful. Some
companies
give their employees (i.e. sales department folks) more power than others,
allowing them to make exceptions based on their judgement.
It doesn't
bject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> I simply pointed out that most companies don't consider someone who
> buys one product, once, to be a loyal customer.
What's the criteria for being a loyal customer? Buying something every time
they have something to sell whether
back to me for that re-design,
I consider that loyalty. They don't have to get a re-design every year
to be considered a loyal customer.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 1:19 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for C
> From your view, good business is the customer doing what's
> best for the company. From my view, good business is the
> company doing what's best for the customer.
That's not my view at all. However, you mentioned that you were a "loyal"
customer; I simply pointed out that most companies don't
.that was a big concern
for a lot of people when the buyout first occurred...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 5:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Rick Faircloth wrote:
>
> ASP.NET 2.
arlier
versions?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 2:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> And, frankly, I don't care if the software is 7 years old.
> They got $1300 7 years ago or so, and
Rick Faircloth wrote:
>
> ASP.NET 2.0...harder to code, I think, but seems to have functions that
> CF 7 doesn't. All the software from OS, server (IIS 6), Visual Web
> Developer,
> all from the same company and integrated in approach...
All in one hand, from one vendor, vertically integrated fr
> No, free isn't the main consideration, but it certainly helps.
> Not just the cost to me, but also to clients who want to
> deploy my apps in-house...I can save them $1300 everytime
> they want to buy an app.
>
> If I replicate the app completely and don't have to change it
> at all for each
> And, frankly, I don't care if the software is 7 years old.
> They got $1300 7 years ago or so, and that's a lot more than
> they've gotten from someone who hasn't bought anything before.
> I just feel there should be some consideration for any
> previous customer's investment. Even if on a s
x27;m in business for that.
But I do reward long-time customer loyalty.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> ASP.NET 2.0...harder to code, I think, but seems to
for the reasons I've stated above, it will provide greater
ROI...and that's what we're all after.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> I know it may
> ASP.NET 2.0...harder to code, I think, but seems to have
> functions that CF 7 doesn't. All the software from OS,
> server (IIS 6), Visual Web Developer, all from the same
> company and integrated in approach...
And, likewise, CFMX 7 has lots of functionality that ASP.NET doesn't have.
For t
> I know it may be the norm, but I still don't have to like
> it...it's not like it was a $75 piece of software.
>
> And I've learned from multiple upgrades in prior years of
> other software and systems that there're always problems with
> upgrading. I've witnessed them on this list.
>
> I ju
Yep, learn ASP.net 2.0, php, python, or ruby. Learning any of these will
help expand your ideas on how to approach different problems. CF is great,
but it's not always the best solution.
On 5/5/06, Aaron Rouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd learn something other than CF, knowing 4.5.2 well e
I'd learn something other than CF, knowing 4.5.2 well enough to me would be
good enough knowledge to pick up a later version of CFM but it helps none or
very little to learn some other language. The more tools in your box, the
better off you are.
On 5/5/06, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Thanks! I'll finally have something named after me! Little ole me!
I want to thank all my fans, friends, etc... ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Crow T. Robot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 5:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
We s
OTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 5:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
>> I had about convinced myself to make the leap from 4.5,
>> then Adobe decided that I had to pay $1300 while everyone
>> else has to pay only about $600...just a little annoyed
think that not learning
> newer versions or other technologies is just going to end up hurting someone
> in the long run even if they are self-employed.
>
> On 5/5/06, Todd Rafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
plans for software that far back (and software that is so
old that it is no longer supported), that really is the norm.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 4:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programm
e [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 4:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
There were a few custom tags for this that worked in CF4 and above. We use
a in house built "framework" at one of the places I work and it was built on
CF4. We use it on
eveloper Express 2005, Visual Studio Standard,
Sql Server Express...
Upgrade price and client cost to use my apps in-house...there's the
two friction points.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Todd Rafferty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 3:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE
Never used it...I'll have to look into that, Charlie...maybe
that'll
give me a push back toward CF! ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 3:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
alon
;
> -Original Message-
> From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 3:31 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
>
> alone is worth $1300 :)
>
>
>
>
~~
Amen! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 3:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
alone is worth $1300 :)
~|
Message: http
alone is worth $1300 :)
On 5/5/06, Todd Rafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rick,
>
> I have to say I'm a little confuzzled about all this. I mean, you're in
> CF4.5 now and ... you're claiming that $1300 is a lot to cough up for the
> CFMX server and that you've made plenty of money with CF4.
Rick,
I have to say I'm a little confuzzled about all this. I mean, you're in
CF4.5 now and ... you're claiming that $1300 is a lot to cough up for the
CFMX server and that you've made plenty of money with CF4.5, etc. What
happened?
The development difference between CF 4 and CFMX6/7 is night a
look for them. Just offering a different, probably unwelcomed
response.
~Todd
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 2:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Thanks for the explanation and info, Jeff.
>
Jeff Fleitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
If you buy FlexBuilder 2 when it is released and install the standalone
version, you won't have to know anything about Eclipse. You are isolated
from Eclipse for
Thanks for the clarification, Ben...got it!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
FlexBuilder is built on top of Eclipse. It can be used in two ways:
1) If you have
-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> So, to clarify...if I *want* to use Flex Builder, then I have
> to use Eclipse and/or CFEclipse? I guess I'm trying to
> completely understand what is meant by "Eclipsed based IDE"...
Eclipse is an IDE. FlexBuilder is a
If you buy FlexBuilder 2 when it is released and install the standalone
version, you won't have to know anything about Eclipse. You are isolated
from Eclipse for the most part. As Ben stated, the IDE runs on top of
Eclipse. If you are using Eclipse as your primary IDE, then you can opt to
instal
ssage-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
So, to clarify...if I *want* to use Flex Builder, then I have to use Eclipse
and/or CFEclipse? I guess I'm trying to completely understand what i
> So, to clarify...if I *want* to use Flex Builder, then I have
> to use Eclipse and/or CFEclipse? I guess I'm trying to
> completely understand what is meant by "Eclipsed based IDE"...
Eclipse is an IDE. FlexBuilder is a plugin for Eclipse. When you install
FlexBuilder, you have the choice to
PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Flex has no specific IDE requirements. Flex Builder is an Eclipse based IDE
(which works really nicely alongside CFEclipse). There are lots of good
reasons to use Flex Builder to build your Flex 2 apps, but no, Flex Builder
is not require
~Brad
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 12:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Flex has no specific IDE requirements. Flex Builder is an Eclipse based
IDE
(which works really nicely alongside CFEclipse). There are lo
on
the server, or just using the free Flex SDK.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Does the use of Flex require the use of CFEclipse or Eclipse at all?
Rick
Does the use of Flex require the use of CFEclipse or Eclipse at all?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 12:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Cfeclipse doesn't require any version of CF to run, it
Cfeclipse doesn't require any version of CF to run, it is an IDE.
It does support writing code for both CF5 and CFMX though.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 May 2006 17:43
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
What i
the "backroom" of app development
> and not be used for the "showrooom" until search engine spider
> compatibility can somehow be addressed. It would be a shame
> to use such a powerful tool in such a limited roll.
>
> Rick
>
>
> -Original Message--
t; compatibility can somehow be addressed. It would be a shame
> to use such a powerful tool in such a limited roll.
>
> Rick
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Fleitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 9:06 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re
e a shame
to use such a powerful tool in such a limited roll.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Fleitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 9:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
The info you are looking at regarding Flex pricing appears to be
eptable for sites, not matter how
> "Rich" the interactivity...
>
> Thoughts on this, anyone?
>
> Rick
-Original Message-
> From: Denny Valliant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:51 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: ASP.Net bo
I did a google a while back when I took a look at the Flex2 builder
plugin for Eclipse (Or more the videos demonstrating it.) for Flash
accessibility issues. There were some caveats, but I don't
remember any real show stoppers. I think the spidering is
handleable as well.
The price issue is a co
?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Denny Valliant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:51 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
OpenLaszlo has an IDE for visual editing. It looks interesting, haven't
played with it much. Flex has a well integrated vi
OpenLaszlo has an IDE for visual editing. It looks interesting, haven't
played with it much. Flex has a well integrated visual editor as well.
They're both sorta left of the HTML experience though...
I'm guessing VWD stands for Visual Web Design, and thus this
comment.
:)enny
On 5/4/06, Rick F
#x27;ll have to give it another look...
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 11:20 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
I guess so, but whether it has tag completion etc I don't know(chances ar
I guess so, but whether it has tag completion etc I don't know(chances are
it doesn't). Would be cool I guess but I prefer Homesite.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 May 2006 15:56
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
I've been using Visual Web Dev(2005 Express, is there another version?)
lately. One thing to keep in mind is that it's for .Net 2.0 and from the
info I've found on the web, you can't make it only
Go for it.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 May 2006 17:18
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> Nevermind Dave, go back to sleep.
That's a great idea! And while I'm asleep, I'll dream of a world where
ev
> Nevermind Dave, go back to sleep.
That's a great idea! And while I'm asleep, I'll dream of a world where
everyone understands English.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers
>From an administration standpoint, 4.5.1 is a nightmare compared to MX.
Sandboxes are a good thing. You can secure MX much better than 4.5.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 6:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
That'
2005 be used to create anything
but asp.net pages? Can it be used to create cfm pages?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 2:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
I've been using Visual Web
Nevermind Dave, go back to sleep.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 May 2006 21:20
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> Now that is not what I said is it.
That is certainly the implication of your statement.
> I am
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 May 2006 23:35
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
>Well then, if you're not using new functionality, why move to anything else
>at all? Why not stick with CF 4.5.1 SP2?
That&
n Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:31 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
>
>
> If I was in your shoes I would be learning something like Flex 2 and then
> figuring out what language you want to use to serve data to/from
Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
If I was in your shoes I would be learning something like Flex 2 and then
figuring out what language you want to use to serve data to/from it could be
CFM or whatever you pic
Developer, and
> probably SQL Server Express and thorough shakedown.
>
> Rick
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 4:35 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
>
>
> &g
ge-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 4:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> I hear what you're saying about the programming
> part...however, most of the sites I build are fairly
> simple...add, update, delete, report
> I hear what you're saying about the programming
> part...however, most of the sites I build are fairly
> simple...add, update, delete, report.
>
> Once I've grasped how to code that in ASP.NET, I can do 90%
> of the work I do. And according to the ASP.NET Programming
> for Cold Fusion Progr
> Now that is not what I said is it.
That is certainly the implication of your statement.
> I am simply saying, some people will do and do do it anyway.
> You can say it's wrong till the cows come come, but that wont
> stop people doing it.
So why did you mention it in the first place?
Dave Wa
bject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> Yes well at the end of the day, unless someone from MS visits every
> subscriber, they dunno what your using it for do they.
> And how many end users can't afford the software off the shelf anyway
> and use pirate copies.
> So
L PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> Not quite sure I understand your response...it seems like
> we're saying the same thing...
>
> Scenario 1:
>
> Server Hardware
> Windows Server OS
> Cold Fu
y understand it a lot better if I had used a CF framework
and moved beyond CF 4.5.2... :oP
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Plunkett, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
Adam, I've been w
Was just about to sign up when I spotted:
"Offer good in the United States and Canada only through June 30, 2006,
while supplies last."
:O(
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 May 2006 17:10
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF
> Yes well at the end of the day, unless someone from MS visits
> every subscriber, they dunno what your using it for do they.
> And how many end users can't afford the software off the
> shelf anyway and use pirate copies.
> So paying for action pack is certainly better than doing
> that, at l
ith development.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 May 2006 17:46
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
>
> I thought the licensing for the action pack did not allow people to run
> the
> software beyond e
Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 May 2006 17:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ASP.Net book for CF programmer
> An SPLA make sMicrosoft products more affordable.
"Free" is cheaper than "cheap".
> And for local office/dev environment, the microsoft action pack is
&
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
