External routes that are advertised throughout the OSPF domain at a cost
equal to their metric at the point of redistribution.
Type 1 external routes are advertised into the OSPF domain at the cost equal
to the cost at the redistribution point plus the accumulated cost of the
OSPF links traversed
Depends on the IOS version
In earlier ( 11.3 and earlier, if memory serves ) you can have what I call
the "phantom clockrate"
Swap the cable ends, and watch the clockrate appear on that interface where
the command "would not take".
Swap again, and watch the command disappear again.
This was co
No and that's one of the gotcha's
Suppose a server nic fails. You swap it out, turn the server back on, it
sees the network fine, but your users can't attach. Problem - their arp
caches has not flushed, and contains old bad information.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco TAC always wants to telnet in to troubleshoot when working a ticket.
One alternative is to e-mail your configs to them, at which point maybe they
will get back to you with some resolution in a time frame you can live with.
Fact is that the internet makes things so damn convenient for us. Mo
Saw this one come across NANOG earlier. Thought it interesting enough to
pass along.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Marshall Eubanks
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 7:28 PM
To: James Harkins
Cc: Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED
TCP port 0 is reserved.
Bookmark this site:
http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/port-numbers
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Nurarif W
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 11:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Couple of follow ups on one of the latest threats:
-
Also see
http://service1.symantec.com/sarc/sarc.nsf/html/Linux.Ramen.Worm.html I like
the part about it patching the holes that it uses...
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
-Original Message-
From: [
Interesting. If I have a named access-list, it would appear I cannot do a
debug
Debug ip packet ?
(1-199) access-list
(1300-2699) access list extended range
detail
(cr)
Chuck
http://www.1112.net/lastpage.html
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
You forgot the line about "shell out more bucks"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ole
Drews Jensen
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 11:39 AM
To: 'Kevin Wigle'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ole Drews Jensen
Subject:RE: Specialization fo
I did a quick read of RFC titles, but did not see anything that looked
promising
Ipv6 appears to me to have been created as a way of dealing with the IP
number shortage. Of course all related protocols and stacks will have to be
modified to work with Ipv6
For BGP - will the AS field be upped to,
So what was the problem you found that was effecting traffic negatively?
CEF does not necessarily "load share" equally across two paths. It can be
set up to do "per source/destination" or "per packet"
Per source/destination has the usual problems - all traffic can end up going
across one link. P
By having ISP1 advertise both its aggregate and the more-specific,
the routing system conceptually will contain:
192.168.0.0/16 ISP1
192.168.2.0/24 ISP1
192.168.2.0/24 ISP2
CL: And two more routes go into the global tables. Wasn't CIDR supposed to
stop this kind of thing? ;
According to Amazon, Doyle's volume 2 has a 6 week lead time. Has anyone
actually seen this one on the shelves yet?
Halabi is remarkably clear reading. But it never hurts to have a second way
of looking at things.
Doyle vol 1 is definitely a must. I would add Slattery / Burton Advanced IP
routin
Having just exited a three day Global Knowledge class on BGP, let's see if
anything sunk through this thick skull of mine. Comments in line.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Peter Abraham
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 2:02 PM
To:
xcellent source for information, study materials, practice questions,
practice exams, and practice labs. Applicable for all levels of
certification, as well as the attainment of internetworking expertise. Tell
them Chuck Larrieu sent you. ( disclaimer - I will receive addition free
months members
The problem is that you do not have provider independent space, and
therefore you are breaking CIDR rules when you advertise the more specific
route through provider B.
So... out on the internet, there are two routes appearing in everyone's BGP
tables. One is to provider A's aggregate. The other
I'm new at this, but feeling good after my class last week. Wouldn't it be
more appropriate to ask the first provider to advertise the specific subnet
in addition to the aggregate? In other words, if the provider is
aggregating, in compliance with best practice on the net, the only choices
are to
I've now attended two of these, and in general have found them both well
worth the effort it takes me to attend
( long drive, work schedule finagling )
The security seminar was focused around securing routers. It was interesting
for me to hear other philosophies. For example, the speaker was not
Hhhh A quick trip to the Cisco configuration tool at
http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/front.x/config_root.pl
reveals that the 4500 can take module NP-CT1 T1 channelized PRI, as does the
4700
bookmark this one, folks. It will save you a lot of time and trouble.
Chuck
-Original Messag
Interesting theory. The RFC states ( as does Halabi ) that eBGP peers must
be on the same subnet. I wonder if the ebgp-multihop is a Cisco thing? Kinda
along the lines of ip unnumbered?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Andrew Smit
.0
network 192.167.9.0
network 199.199.199.0
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial1
yes I did a clear ip bgp * between config changes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jay
Hennigan
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 7:20 PM
To: Chu
Read all questions carefully. Don't be discouraged by the couple of
questions for which there is no right answer. Concentrate on protocol
behaviors as determined by Cisco - TCP, routing protocols, desktop - meaning
netbios and IPX, with maybe a smattering of Appletalk. Those three areas
cover 75%
Someone asked the question earlier. I found the following document while
cleaning up my office/lab. It is the document referred to in the Birkner
Cisco Press ) book, as what to study to prepare for the Stratecom portion
of the current CID test.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wan
n does not provide us with a
correct option. as called for in the question "10.1.0.0/24"
Anyone else took a look at this.. Or got it work any other way?
Nigel.
>From: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
A segmented area is of no concern so long as there is no overlap of address
space. In your case, it would appear that there might be such an overlap. A
temporary repair can be made using a virtual link.
( an interesting aside - the OSPF RFC makes short mention of segmented
areas. There is nothing
Check this out.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:BGP
you may need a CCO login for this. I'm still checking some of them. Some of
the articles are from the documentation home page, which does not require a
login.
Chuck
CCIE Written October 28 - clock's tic
I believe we have had this discussion in a slightly different form in the
past. There have been numerous problems with NIC's of all sort, full duplex,
half duplex, auto-negotiate, etc and their ability to connect to Cisco
switches. I believe that most of these problems have been corrected with
eit
No problem. It does not matter which of the two routers is the DCE side.
This has no effect whatsoever on the lab or its results.
This is a good opportunity for you to practice your documentation skills,
modify the configs to conform to your routersim setup, and proceed to the
more important thi
Jim, I'm going to bring this one back public, if you don't mind. I think
there are some points worth studying.
I did a quick lab to test a couple of things. I'm going to have to ask
everyone to trust me that all things are configured correctly. I don't want
to spend all night copying configs and
Part
of every networking person's repertoire should be:
http://www.iana.org/numbers.htm
contains the most recent port assignments and a whole
lot more.
in
another mail you were told ports 5190 and 4000.
5190
is registered to AOL ( whom I believe owns ICQ? )
port
4000 is registere
;From: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Jim Dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Converting RIP to EIGRP (Online)
>Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:08:47 -0700
>
&g
Frank, the pricing tool my employer uses puts the list price at $750.oo
I understand the plan is that this module will become supported in the 26xx
and 36xx series by year end.
The same pricing tool shows that Cisco is offering a 1720-ADSL package for
$1695.
I have not pursued this in terms of
Would you guys cut it out!
Now I've got another lab idea to try out, to whit: if you install OSPF over
EIGRP, what will the OSPF side of things look like? I.e. the spf tables? I
am confident in predicting that the routing table will contain only the
EIGRP routes, because those would be prefer
Come to work for my employer. Believe it of not, they value the CCDP FAR
more than the CCNP. I am told that I qualify for a hefty raise come review
time. :-> CCIE still rules all, though.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John
Robe
Well, I couldn't resist. I had the router pod set up for a RIP to EIGRP
migration test yesterday. I am not sure that the results will soothe your
concerns, Mr. Cthulu.
I would post configurations, but the file size exceeds what Paul allows.
Those who are interested, contact me off line, and I w
Akiddeledivydo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Cthulu, CCIE Candidate
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 7:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:IP Classless (from Q&A Forum at Cisco)
I got this off teh Q&A forum, and thou
Ah.. the old "bad equipment" ruse!
I see a bit of this myself. Customers order drop ship because they don't
want to pay for professional services. They can't get it to work. Therefore
the equipment is bad. The only way to prove otherwise is to configure it
correctly. Voila - free services
Gl
Thanks, I think. How to be a bell-head in one easy lesson :->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ole
Drews Jensen
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 10:44 AM
To: 'Keith Townsend'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: hat is F2 cabl
Title: OT - IDSL Bridge
the
number one Bad Thing is that the Cisco device might not be compatible with the
carrier DSLAM. In which case you would be SOL.
if the
Cisco device is compatible with the DSLAM, then your only real risk is that the
carrier would not offer any support with configur
There is an interesting thread coming through on NANOG ( www.nanog.org )
regarding a suspected DDoS buildup. The following in one message I thought
might be of interest to us Cisco aficionados
BTW - there is reportedly an extreme increase in port scans and hack
attempts over port 139 ( quick - wh
May I clarify something? Because I believe that Juniper is high end core /
carrier class type equipment. Am I correct? We are not talking about
replacing 2501's , or 3640's, or even 7500's. We are talking stuff used to
terminate many multiple OC3 and higher? Correct?
Chuck
-Original Message
Can't sleep until I make some sense out of this one. After reading the
many fine replies to my original study I came to believe there was a flaw in
my methodology. Tonight's results seem to indicate this was true.
So... for testing purposes I now know another behaviour of OSPF. On loopback
int
Many things are possible. You can win the lottery and not need to work ever
again. But at two hundred bucks a pop do you really want to gamble?
If so, I know a poker game you can get into. :->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
S
sday, September 28, 2000 11:57 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Juniper
Absolutely. The Juniper M20, M40, and M160 Internet Backbone Routers
are sometimes chosen instead of the Cisco 12000 Series. Press reports
say that Juniper has gained some of the market share at
Check your spelling. I think you mean Le Mans, not lamens. The port goes
into racing mode, trying to beat the course time for creating a new tree,
without wrapping itself around one. I still like those Ferrari's the best
:->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Hi, guys and gals! Miss me while I was gone? :->
I am quite pleased and very proud to announce that I passed my CCIE written
this morning. I won't bore you with my score, let alone the number of
questions on the test and the passing score. This sort of thing information
is available elsewhere. M
The answer, no doubt, is Radia Perlman, who once upon a time, according to
Internconnections, was employed by Novell, and who states in
Interconnections that NLSP is an IPX-specific version of IS-IS, which she
also designed.
Chuck
"A.Strobel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED
locate PIX configuration materials on CCO as well.
also, it will not hurt to have Cisco Access Lists Field Guide by Gil Held
and Keith Hundley. Pay particlar attention to firewall related access
lists.
if memory serves, it can't hurt to review fundamentals of TACACS+ and
Radius.
Best wishes
C
Quick and dirty book review.
CCIE Routing and Switching Exam Cram, by Tom Thomas and Henry Benjamin
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1576104338/qid=972768223/sr=1-3/104-3
810111-6781503
I truly wanted to hate this book. The very title Exam Cram rubs me the wrong
way for some reason. But m
My recommendation for preparation materials for the CCIE written ( routing
and switching 350-001 )
1) Cisco's own web site. There is a WEALTH of excellent materials to be
found there, all FREE. Check under the CCIE section of career
certifications.
2) Jeff Doyle - TCP/IP routing. There is NO su
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 3:02 PM
To: Cisco Mail List
Subject:CCIE Written - Preparation Materials
My recommendation for preparation materials for the CCIE written ( routin
Supernetting, CIDR, aggregation - all different names for the beast.
It is the way of representing multiple networks with a single mask.
You already know that you can subnet a class C, breaking it into multiple
/27's or /30's, for example. So you can have 192.168.100.0/27, resulting in
subnets 1
As an offshoot of the original question, among the IP crowd, "host" refers
to any device with an IP address. This is different than in the IMB world,
where "host" was the mainframe, which "hosted" the applications one accessed
via the 32xx terminal on your desk. This terminology spilled over into
I believe that listening for RIP v2 must be done on an interface by
interface basis using the "ip rip receive version 2" command.
If memory serves, I did a quick and dirty lab and reported the results some
time back. Those with no lives (:->) may want to check the archives.
Which reminds me, any
Normally I would make some righteous comment about looking it up on CCO, but
I find that as usual, the information is not necessarily readily found.
>From CCO:
Asynchronous/Synchronous Port Features
The low-speed asynchronous/synchronous ports connect terminals, printers,
modems, microcomputers,
Speaking of evil test creators, the one I've always wondered about is actual
T1/DS1 throughput. I believe serial lines are full duplex. So NOW what is
the REAL bit rate? ;->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Brian
Sent: Saturda
Certification Zone ( www.certificationzone.com ), known for its topic matter
white papers and practice labs, is now selling the CD2000, a compendium of
practice tests for the CCIE and CCNA certifications.
As the CD was released with time to spare before my CCIE written exam, I was
able to incorpo
There is an interesting thread occurring on NANOG this morning regarding
IS-IS and other routing problems.
Check out the archives at www.nanog.org under the topic "IS-IS protocol
implementation problem"
Chuck
--
_
FAQ, list archives, and subsc
At the risk of being characterized as picky and crabby ( at best ) could I
ask that people please do not post the same question to both the CCIE and
the regular list? Particularly the "help desk" type questions?
thanks
Chuck
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
My response would be "can you add anything to that?" :->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Scott M. Trieste
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Please don't lie on resumes
My answer is
In the world of Cisco, which I presume is the focus of this test group, the
answer would be C
As we all know, in the world of Cisco, there is no other vendor ;->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Glenn Johnson
Sent: Monday, October
the mere existence of a CCIE Security beta exam tells me that there will
soon be a CCIE / Security track, in addition to the R&S, ISP, and WAN ( with
the Design due Real Soon Now? )
No doubt PIX will figure heavly in this one. :->
Chuck
George Spahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL
to put it another way, 2,500,000 cells x 53 bytes per cell = 132,500,000
bytes per second = 1,060,000,000 bits per second - over a gigabit. over 7
times the capacity of an OC3. not even full duplex hype covers this one.
all these errors in all these sources really pisses me off.
Chuck
Phil Bar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Wireless LANS
At 11:56 AM 10/30/00, Stanfield Hilman B (Brad) CONT NNSY wrote:
>Three words...
illa. One can see why you are still at the top of your
game.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 1:31 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Wireless LANS
At 01:05 PM 10/30/00, C
To clarify further, at this point in time what you have is really a return
to the old 10baseT hub, if you will, with all the bad things that may
entail. On the other hand, it might be argued that those most likely to want
this mobility are management types who want nothing more than to read their
HOT DAWG!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of GEM
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Check what's new on CCIE R/S Webpage, right now!
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/62
Politically or realistically? :->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Perry Lucas
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Wireless LANS
Slow? How many end-users (n
I came across the following approach while preparing for my CCIE written.
Both BOSON and CertificationZone practice tests used questions centered
around this approach, and I found it useful in studying protocol behavior.
Draw out an environment kinda like the following:
Hostmediumdevice-
got
this response from Cisco when I inquired about Lab
scheduling
( and
no I have no intention of being in Nova Scotia in February.
I'm
trying to convince my employer to send me to Sao Paolo ;->
)
Chuck
-Original Message-From: Christine Jeffrey
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Looking at my handy World of Protocols book from Radcom, the ATM header
format is quite clear
For UNI, there is a four bit GFC field, followed by 8 bits VPI and 16 bits
VCI fields
For NNI, there is no GFC field, and the extra four bits goes to the VPI
field, making it 12 bits. the VCI field rema
I did a quick check on the IEEE site
http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/oui.txt
according to the list, there are only a couple of registered OUI's that
begin with a "1". They are registered to AT&T Bell Labs ( 80-00-10 )and DEC
( AA-00-00 )and a couple of successors )
I presume these were fo
Tried real hard to get the March 31 - April 1 date. What could be more
appropriate, and offer a lab proctor better opportunity for mischief? ;->
Unfortunately, that weekend was taken.
So I am scheduled for April 7-8. Unless of course Sao Paolo has an opening
;->
Chuck
--
I
Assuming I am not missing the trick, dynamic routing is routing based upon
exchange of routing information among routers, using a routing protocol of
one sort or another. Opposite of static routing, in which routes are
manually entered into the routing process.
Chuck
-Original Message-
F
In case anyone is interested:
Serves me right. My poor little fingers are hurting from replying to all the
requests.
The text document is now on my poor excuse of a web site
http://www.chuck.to/CCIEAdvice.txt
Hope this helps.
Chuck
_
FAQ, list archives, and subsc
one more reason to read my posts first - the link I sent is fine. can go in
as either guest or registered. info looks to be about the same. here it is
again.
http://www.cisco.com/tac/newsflash/vpn2.html
Chuck
"Greg Reaume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8tt4o9$cic$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanh, this is not an overwhelming project by any means. You have a
wonderful opportunity here to learn a lot of things. So don't be afraid to
challenge yourself.
1) call in a couple of different vendors and ask for recommendations. Listen
to what they say. Ask questions.
2) Buy something from t
To be anal retentive about it, DLCI's are not locally significant because
there might be more than one per pvc.
There are only 10 bits in the DLCI field, meaning you can have a max of
1023. This fact alone would indicate the difficulty of having globally
significant numbers. ;->
One may request
Check this one:
http://www.1112.net/lastpage.html
Chuck
--
I am Locutus, a CCIE Lab Proctor. Xx_Brain_dumps_xX are futile. Your life as
it has been is over ( if you hope to pass ) From this time forward, you will
study US!
( apologies to the folks at Star Trek TNG )
___
DSL is definitely NOT plug and play at this time. And yes it is no fun at
all trying to find someone at any DSL provider who can tell you all the
equipment they certify as compatible with their DSLAM's.
At this point in time, I believe the Cisco 827's will work on Pac Bell's
network, as with the
Tony Li, the author of RFC 1771, can tell you a lot..
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1771.txt
So can Bassam Halabi, author of Internet Routing Architectures
Here is a good link on CCO
http://www.cisco.com/cpress/cc/td/cpress/fund/ith2nd/it2435.htm
John Stewart, author of BGP4, Interdomain Rout
I've heard one or two people mention the patch panel.
As for the IOS versions, hey - it's in the blueprint, and should have been
no surprise. Several people who have offered study tips have mentioned the
necessity to read and be familiar with the IOS documentation, and different
versions. Your bo
So, Sasa, what can you tell me from this output? :->
Chuck
Router#sh flash chips
16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)
ChipBankCode Size Name
1 1 01AD 2048KBAMD 29F016
2 1 01AD 2048KBAMD 29F016
3
Well, that was a lot of fun. The Sylvan test center had major system
problems. Mine was the only one of five test takers whose computer was
operational. The noise from the troubleshooting was distracting, as well as
annoying. But that's ok. How many real life situations have I been in where
the co
As long as they don't mind passing each and every one of their lower level
cert exams by 20 points or less ;->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Thomas Lisa
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 12:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
At the risk of being anal retentive ( quiet, Rodgers :-> ) we mustn't forget
the MTU, window size, TCP and IP headers, and ack's. I believe we have done
a couple of threads along these lines over time. Memory probably doesn't
serve, but I believe one can count on a 10-15% overhead cost.
Also, it
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 3:30 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; Sasa Milic; Brian
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Cisco memory
Alright- new twist to this question... when installing two 4 Meg sticks,
normally you want to spoof the router into thinking it&#
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
derek lewinson
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 4:18 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Cc: cisco@groupstudy. com
Subject:RE: Cisco memory
you have 2 banks,
each bank has 8mb installed (each chip is 2048kb in size)
if I'm re
1) CONGRATULATIONS!!
2) How you gonna book a lab within three months? Where you planning on
taking it?
3) For voice, find someplace that has voice capable stuff, rent or borrow
time, and practice. The most recent CCIE where I work said the voice part of
his lab was only a couple of points. H
9:34 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Cc: SH Wesson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: transfer rate
On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
> At the risk of being anal retentive ( quiet, Rodgers :-> ) we mustn't
forget
> the MTU, window size, TCP and IP headers, and ack's. I belie
A /20 will summarize 16, 17, and a whole bunch more, all the way up through
31. This would create havoc on the network, because there would be overlap
with the division that is advertising subnets 24 through 31.
If you look at your binary, you can see that the bits that remain identical
for both
Think in terms of the OSI model ( much as we all hate it and denigrate it )
At what layer is the switch operating? I.e. is it a layer 3 switch? What
device is doing the inter-vlan routing? The switch or an external router?
That said, will you ever need to telnet to the switch, which should help
Hhhm.. do we really want to start with the political jokes?
BTW you got me, Howard. Why is Hilliary like a BPX?
Should I repeat my joke about how most 50 year old men differ from Bill
Clinton?
Vote for Cthulu. Why choose the lesser evil?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
The CCIE page on CCO tells it all. Lots of links. Lots of reading. Sample
questions. Why do you think the test would cover anything different from
what Cisco SAYS will be on the test?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Shehzad H Hassan
Se
I think the upcoming CCIE / Security will be HOT!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
mindiani mindiani
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 6:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Which is teh best CCIE R/S or CCIE Design?
Pl
OSPF = EQUAL cost load balance.
UNEQUAL line speed = NO load balance.
That's the idea of the "shortest path first" algorithm - pick the SHORTEST
path FIRST.
Must be bedtime. I'm getting awfully cranky. Sorry.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any box can be compromised, be it router, firewall, or proxy server, and
despite the religious war that generally erupts when you say it, any OS can
be compromised, be it Unix, Solaris, Linux, or NT.
Security is a matter of policy, and placement, and structure, and realistic
risk assessment.
Que
No the two exams are not the same. Well, I guess I shouldn't say that
definitively, since I have not seen 350-009 ;->
In the prelude to the Security Beta, it was stated in no uncertain terms
that passing the beta did NOT serve to meet the requirement for
recertification.
Chuck
-Original Me
Got a question about this.
Application wants to open a TCP connection to something - say http, so the
application issues the request, TCP on the application side uses some random
port number above 1023 as the source port number. The destination port is
the well know port on the distant end.
Howe
Blueprint says it all.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of tony
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 5:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:CCIE Security suggestions??
Dear all,
I'm going to take the CCIE Security beta exam on
201 - 300 of 1355 matches
Mail list logo
