I would imagine the 5 CCIE mark has already been obtained. I met someone
who was working on their 5th at the end of the summer and I'm sure they
have passed by now.
Don't forget the article in Packet about Mark Purcell. I'm not sure on
the spelling of his name, but he already had 4 and was working
I bet I know which one is damaged. I would put money on the Caslow book.
Mine fell apart at the binding in no time flat. Whoever bound the Caslow
book did a very poor job.
-Original Message-
From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 5:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
You can hardcode the source address of TACACS requests on the routers.
This keeps you from needing to define every interface in the TACACS
server. The command is ip tacacs source-interface.
You can also define network devices in CiscoSecure with wildcards. You
could have one entry that maps all ro
This is my point exactly. I don't allow my IDS to respond to attacks for
the very reason you stated. It could easily force a DoS. I think a lot
of people don't take this into consideration. The vendors push automatic
response as a sexy feature when it really could be a major nuisance. Let
each piec
Come on now, the slammer worm? If you are security conscious this
shouldn't have had any effect on you. Microsoft released a patch last
summer. Security is a best effort solution. It is about layers and
maintenance. You cannot eliminate risk, you can only reduce risk.
An IDSs responsibility is to
Unless you have a relationship with a reseller they will charge you $100
for an evaluation license and media.
I have a few extra licenses. I would be willing to give you one. The
evaluation licenses are only good for 30 days. If this works for you,
drop me a line.
-Original Message-
From:
A completely passive attack can capture data and derive a WEP key
without an association. This is the real issue with WEP encryption and
wireless networks. A wireless network card and AirSnort or Ethereal
will get you the same result.
-Original Message-
From: s vermill [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
I'm testing this very scenario at the moment. Just force the use of EAP
and turn off Open and Shared authentication.
I would probably pick (LEAP/PEAP + (BKR or TKIP)) or IPSEC. Although the
IPSEC-only route wouldn't afford you the ability to deny surfing from
the DMZ. EAP locks down the network ac
Does your checkpoint licensing support VPN? If so it is very easy to
build a secure tunnel between sites that is encrypted. If you send me
the feature portion of the licensing string I can tell you if it
supports encryption.
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Here is a link to the BXA page about exporting encryption. They way I
read it, and applied it, is you don't need permission or registration to
use 3DES in countries except in countries labeled as terrorist countries
or if you organization falls into the terrorist category.
If you are sending comme
The ACS server should have some error report in the logs if the router
is contacting it. It sounds like the response is so quick, the ACS
server isn't doing a lookup.
Have you nailed down the interface the router should use as the source
address for contacting the ACS server.
If not, the router c
The image is working on other 3662 routers, but do are they the EXACT
same configuration.
Do they all have exactly the same network modules and WIC cards in them?
Are all of the module and cards the same code revision?
I would try a different version of the IOS.
-Original Message-
Fro
Port Address Translation.
-Original Message-
From: Harold Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910]
This is something I've been wondering about also. As I understand it
when
you "se
Try 'clear ip ospf proc'
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to force a new DR? [7:54810]
Hello friends,
I have a question for you, maybe you can help me...
I belong to the CheckPoint list server and a very similar discussion is
happening over there referencing Outlook over a VPN between CheckPoint
firewalls.
Could this problem be related to Tunnel overhead and packet
fragmentation?
I think this might be a problem with Microsoft's implementation of
Elmer,
The way I read your config. You have enabled a single interface with
EIGRP routing, interface loopback17 of network 192.168.199.0/24.
You are redistributing all of EIGRP into BGP which only includes this
one network.
You are aggregating 192.168.192.0 255.255.248.0. The aggregate address
.
-Original Message-
From: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 1:31 AM
To: Jim Brown; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: unusual BGP question. [7:54429]
I have the impression that MED is only for outbound
traffic . For inbound traffic try prepending the
routes that you
What about modify the MED of the route?
-Original Message-
From: Casey, Paul (6822) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 9:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unusual BGP question. [7:54429]
Hello,
Anyone any thought on the following lab Im working on,
AS 1
On second thought, it might just require a reload after you add the ipx
routing 2.2.2 command to force the router to use the manual address
after it has picked up an interface mac address.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Brown
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:49 PM
To: 'Mike Ma
If you enter an IPX commands before you define the node address
manually, it will use the highest mac address on Ethernet interface
regardless of the node address manually entered.
To reset the router, you must remove all IPX commands, remove the ipx
routing command, and reboot the router.
The v
I think you can do anything with dialer interfaces that you can do with
legacy DDR, but the inverse is not true.
-Original Message-
From: Roberts, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 10:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Dialer interfaces vs. dialer ma
Make sure you can enter some commands under the BGP process. Just defining
the process in the config doesn't mean the IOS supports it.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Penn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 1:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 3550 EMI [7:52430
First number assigned to a candidate was 1025. When we hit 11025 their will
be 10,000 candidates not including people who didn't recertify.
-Original Message-
From: Reza Sharifi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: No longe
You probably won't be able to pass the lab without practice on a simulator
or the real thing.
-Original Message-
From: Robert D. Cluett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISDN Cable for lab? [7:51651]
is it really worth i
This is the whole concept behind frame relay. The provider oversubscribes
the network and this is your port speed, your CIR is the guaranteed amount
even during times of congestion. Airlines do the same thing, the sell more
seats on flights than they actually have. Welcome to oversubscription.
Ta
You guys are talking about a lot or work and we all know Paul has other
things to do besides gathering and maintaining data on list members.
In a perfect world it would be great to have the information suggested
below, but someone has to expend the time and effort. I know it won't be me,
I need t
You are not responsible for configuring the switch, but ATM is still on the
test. You will need to configure routers to communicate through the cloud.
-Original Message-
From: Calorifer Gogu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
Base your dialer list on a time based access list. This should do the trick.
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Time-Base ISDN connection [7:48991]
Does anyone have the sample configuration
Most security breaches are by employees.
With that out of the way, I would place the IDS engine in front of the
firewall to catch attacks against devices in the DMZ. In a small trusting
environment, your employees are probably not your biggest threat.
-Original Message-
From: sam sneed
For the money, the Arca Emutel Solo kicks butt. I had an Arca and I
currently have a Atlas and for the money the Arca wins hands down.
A couple of features that make the Arca significantly better than then
cheapisdn unit and most others on the market is the ports are S/T or U and
can be configure
I personally don't think my piece of mind would be worth that much.
Buy hardware from a reputable source on E-bay or I have the number of an
individual I had GREAT success with in California. They sell large volumes
of hardware and I also have the number of someone for memory which you will
need
Get online access for the 3900 it is enough. Be very sad they are removing
Token Ring from the lab, there are the easiest points you will receive on
the lab.
-Original Message-
From: James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCI
It will do the job nicely. No FEC for your lab, but do you really need it?
-Original Message-
From: Ronald James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE Starter & Lab Equipment [7:37312]
Is Catalyst 5000 with Superv
I always understood the desired method for path manipulation and EIGRP was
through the modification of the delay value on the link.
-Original Message-
From: Grant Levy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: EIGRP Bandwidth stat
Very interesting question. What is your application? Where do you plan on
using this and why? Is this from some scenario you are testing?
I would be very interested to know because I would like to work on the same
practice lab if you can share your source.
It is wise to do a little research befo
Even with the variance command a neighbor might not be considered a feasible
successor. Remember a feasible successor is a path whose reported distance
is less than the feasible distance.
This is a loop prevention method in EIGRP.
Read the section, "Deciding if a Path is Loop-Free" in the docum
e. But RTP isn't even a valid choice.
""Jim Brown"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I believe RSVP and RTP should be configured on both ends.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
I believe RSVP and RTP should be configured on both ends.
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QoS Configuration Guidelines [7:33714]
3
""Grad Alfons Kanon"" wrote in message
You can definitely install a DB60 upside down. I won't even say I've watched
a trainee do it, I've done it myself. It is easier than you think, the hood
becomes distorted and it becomes even easier the next time.
-Original Message-
From: Ozzie Sutcliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: M
I thought you only need the neighbor statement on one side of the
connection?
Once a router accepts the hello, adjacencies are formed with information
from the hello via unicast communication from that point forward.
Sort of like if I shout over a hill, "Hey Routerman are you there, this is
Jim
Candidates are responsible for features, up to and including, those found in
12.1 IOS.
It is listed on the website in the certification section.
Please note, this does not mean the routers will have 12.1 on them. They
might have the 12.1 code or some down revision.
-Original Message-
I think the reasoning is to prevent the transmission of traffic almost all
the way through the frame cloud only to have it dropped by the last telco
switch. With congestion notification you can shape the traffic for a more
even flow reducing packet loss and retransmission based on information from
If you are in the DC are maybe you should consider the Net Master Class by
Bruce and Val instead of the Global Knowledge. I attended ECP1 and know a
couple of individuals who attended the new RSNMC1, it sounds like the new
class is even better.
www.netmasterclass.net
You should be able to schedu
:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sniffing my broadband connection to my ISP ??? [7:30689]
At 04:37 PM 1/2/02, Jim Brown wrote:
>Priscilla,
>
>Wouldn't proxy ARP generate an ARP request and an ARP reply if the
>source and target networks were directly connected to the r
Priscilla,
Wouldn't proxy ARP generate an ARP request and an ARP reply if the source
and target networks were directly connected to the router?
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
nd it
""Jim Brown"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The authors intentionally left out the solutions for the big labs. The
> authors wanted to discourage readers from peeking at the solutions.
> They will be available on Cisco
The authors intentionally left out the solutions for the big labs. The
authors wanted to discourage readers from peeking at the solutions. They
will be available on Cisco's web site.
I heard the link is currently dead? I'm sure it will be available in the
very near future.
-Original Message-
I think it ROCKS!
John, you could have purchased it at SoftPro Books since the middle of last
week.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE Practical Studies by Cisco Press [7:30243
I have only done a cursory review, but from what I can tell their approach
is perfect. The author goes through each technology and explains it with as
few routers as necessary, then at the end are six full scale exam style
labs. Really concise material without all the fluff.
I haven't had the cha
They also reduce the amount of oxygen in the lab to simulate networking at
high altitudes. The proctors stand over your shoulders and scream in your
ear just like a military boot camp. You aren't allowed to use the show run
command and must type everything exactly right the first time.
Seriously.
Join the board and use whatever date you feel comfortable with. As far as
the date is concerned, if you can leave on a weeks notice, there will be a
seat available.
Dates are always opening up. Just study with a March date in mind and you
should be able to grab one within two weeks of the test. I
The blurb actually states it is not compatible with the 2600. Check the NM
table towards the bottom of the link.
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716]
Here i
With a single redistribution point, split-horizon should handle the
filtering for you in most cases.
In a production environment I might apply filtering just to be safe, but in
a lab/testing environment why waste the cycles.
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sen
I don't think you can drop just one channel. The variables are only for
enabling the additional channel? I can't remember anything to just drop part
of the bundle.
If I'm incorrect someone will immediately jump in to point it out. So you
should have your answer either way.
-Original Message-
If you deny EIGRP multicasts in the dialer-list it will prevent them from
initiating a call or keeping the line up. They will be uninteresting. and
will not cause the line to dial.
Once the line is up, all packets are fair game regardless of whether or not
they match the dialer-list. Any packet i
The real kicker is you must disable EIGRP split horizon on the interface of
an NBMA network. If you disable it on the interface this will not work. You
must use the no ipx split-horizon EIGRP command. The no ipx
split horizon command doesn't mean squat to EIGRP.
In an NBMA network, you should us
Cisco created the frame relay end-to-end keep alive command to address just
the issue you describe. It actually sends a configurable keep alive between
the end points to verify connectivity.
Check out the Doc CD Wan Switching Guide. Look under frame relay and the
entire keepalive command set is t
What version of the IOS are you running? Some of the 12.0 versions have a
cosmetic bug which shows an invalid SPID when actually, all is well.
-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Alex J. Guanel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Cut and paste baby!
Cut once, paste many.
-Original Message-
From: Courtney Alexander Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:54 PM
To: Bryan Ginman; Joseph Ezerski; McCallum, Robert; 'Ccielab' (E-mail);
Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail); George; Kev;
It sounds like you have the right attitude. Don't go in and think you are
going to fail, YOU CAN PASS on the first attempt. The exam is very doable
and is not overly tricky. A if I only had that first attempt back.
Stay calm and focused and try not to be freaked out on the first attempt.
Show version
-Original Message-
From: george gittins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: how much dram and flash [7:26255]
what command would tell me how much flash and memory i have.
Message Posted at:
http://www.gr
2:36 PM
To: Jim Brown
Subject: RE: isdn simulation [7:25713]
Jim
Thanks for the info. That's what I was afraid of..I
managed to mimic a t1 with back to back csu and was
wondering If isdn works the same way. I was looking at
the ccie lab book and it had an adtran box.
--- Jim Brown wrote:
&g
in my opinion, there is no better firewall.
>Regards,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: worst company [7
CheckPoint = (great product) - (any support infrastructure).
It is without a doubt the least supported product by a manufacturer I have
ever seen. I have outstanding TAC cases over a year old! They charge a
fortune for support and maintenance, which you must have, and you get
nothing for it.
The
Who needs to worry about subnetting with the one day exam? (disclaimer: this
is only a joke, no flames please)
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP addressing Subnetting [7
I don't think each question counts as a single point. I believe some are
weighted different than others.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE Written - scoring method [7:24272]
I
Looks like the numbers have come close to a screeching halt. On August 30th,
they were handing out the low 8100's.
-Original Message-
From: kwock99 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE latest Number [7:24031]
Hi Ji
that - the CCIE written is being revamped to 'fill
in the gaps' from the things that have been removed from the CCIE Lab, and
has always been a separate certification track from the NA/NP track.
-e-
- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Brown"
To:
Sent: Thursday, October
I would say the requirement of the CCNP/CCNA for CCIE written/lab attempts
is only a matter of time.
-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Has anyone failed the CCIE Written? [7:219
I had a problem similar to this in Canada with an ISDN circuit. Try placing
a 9 in from of the dial string. Like office phones when you need to grab an
outside line.
My dial strings looked like 913035551212. The 9 to grab an outside line and
then the full dial string with the 1 prefix for long di
10.0.200.32 mask 0.255.0.15
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ugly Access Lists [7:19996]
I just had to write the ugliest access list I've ever personally
configured. I had to allo
Let me rethink that one
change the interface type with the ospf interface command to non-broadcast
and use a neighbor statement to select the router on the multi-access
segment you would like to form and adjacency with.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
How about a passive interface with a neighbor statement. Changes the
behavior from multicast to unicast, thereby eliminating traffic to the rouge
router.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
You call the LDN, the local directory number. The SPID identifies the
circuit between the router and the CO/Simulator switch.
The SPID goes no further.
-Original Message-
From: Lists Wizard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
int e0
ip address X.X.X.X Y.Y.Y.Y
int e1
bridge-group 1
int s0
ip address X.X.X.X Y.Y.Y.Y
int s1
bridge-group 1
bridge 1 protocol ieee (or dec)
-Original Message-
From: Russ Kreigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
Can't they share a ISDN line? Doesn't the protocol allow for multiple ST
devices assigned different endpoints on the same circuit? Most NT1s have
multiple ST connections.
I'm only speaking from a theoretical standpoint and could be completely way
off base, but couldn't two routers share and singl
One day all the way, unless you are willing to take within the next few
weeks. There are dates open this month.
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Passed the CCIE Written! 850 [7:19
If the question were worded, "In OSPF, the DR is chosen with", I might agree
with the Boson answer, but it seems incorrect with the question stated as
such.
It is fairly ambiguous, but I wouldn't worry about it. You obviously
understand the concept and that is what is really important. I wouldn't
Does anyone have the solution for this lab?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16852&t=16852
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure
The network types must match so the OSPF timers will match and the routers
will form neighbor adjacencies.
There are different reasons why you would want to use each network type, but
the important thing is they all match, or more correctly the timers all
match.
If routers are not neighbors they
It has been a while since I sat the written. If I remember correctly, the
tricky part was "select the correct answers". The operative word answers
being plural. It could be one, two, three
You either know it or you don't.
-Original Message-
From: Rayappa Mayakunthala [mailto:[EMAIL
If you have the right chassis you could use an Integrated T1 MFT card, which
I believe, allows splitting of voice and data.
-Original Message-
From: dragi radovanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 7:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: To CSU/DSU or not to C
You can buy a modular Adtran Atlas 550 cheaper than this unit. It will
support IP, Frame, POTS, BRI, and PRI?
-Original Message-
From: SCollinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 8:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Basic and Primary Rate ISDN Emulator for sale [7:
Which interface is providing clock for the connection? I don't see a 'clock
rate X" command under either interface?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Medley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AGS+ crossed over to 2610, Serial cabl
Sit the IE written and let me know what you think.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Sneed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCNA scoring [7:10407]
I passed CCNA yesterday with a 946/1000(there is no integer divisible by 65
that wou
Ahh, but does the neighbor/peer configuration include the send community
statement?
-Original Message-
From: Bradley J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 2:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: No-Export [7:9565]
Sounds like you've got it. AS 100 send
If you score less than 20 points on your first day you must wait 6 months.
If you fail and score more than 20 points the candidate can reschedule the
lab in as little as 1 month.
You must attempt the lab at least once within the first year of passing the
written or the candidate must sit the writ
It is sort of like the ratings on tires. You should buy something like a Z
rated tire for high speeds on an automobile. You can buy a cheaper tire, but
it probably won't hold up at 150mph. It will work fine for cruising around,
but watch out when you try to push it to the limit.
Those connectors
I believe clock source internal on one of the cards is all you need to bring
them up. Please post the 'show interface' results from both routers and the
related configs.
What pinouts did you use for the cross-over cable?
What LEDs are illuminated on the cards with the cable plugged in?
Are you
t it is all marketing semantics.
>
> In fact I have heard, but not seen, that their is a new gui interface for
> the Pix. Anyone used it lately?
>
> I haven't had time to work with it, since I'm preparing for this little
know
> lab called CCIE or something like that.
Security holes in lower layers? Where did you come up with that, your Cisco
rep?
-Original Message-
From: Eugene Nine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 5:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco PIX vs Checkpoint FIrewall-1 [7:2878]
PIX goes up to layer 4, so
I scanned the message and noticed the configs at the bottom.
You only applied a dialer-group on the dialing end. My testing and
observation determined that you need a dialer-group statement on the remote
end also.
If you do not define any interesting traffic for the remote end it will not
send a
I do it because I love to learn, not for the money. The money is nice, but
if that is your only reason then you are in the wrong business. If you just
want the money there are plenty of other professions that pay more with the
same intelligence factor.
CNE, MCSE, CCIE all of these certificati
Hey guys why don't you take this offline.
Above and beyond the fact this is beyond the scope of this group, I'm fairly
certain you are infringing on somebody's copyright.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PR
_c/scprt2/sctacac.htm#xtocid2173216
watch the wrap!
Enable TACACS to Use a Specific IP Address
You can designate a fixed source IP address for all outgoing TACACS packets.
The feature enables TACACS to use the IP address of a specified interface
for all outgoing TACACS packets. This is especiall
f we were talking
routers, 4 FLASH/ 8 RAM should be enough (even compressed).
Any takers here ???
Thanks
Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Brown"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:07 PM
Subject: RE: Sup I IOS Upgrade Will Not Take [7:113]
> I thought the 4.5(8) im
I thought the 4.5(8) image required 20MB? If not I wasted some money on
memory.
-Original Message-
From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sup I IOS Upgrade Will Not Take [7:113]
I'm upgrading my 5000 (Supervisor I
I don't think that module is even supported in the 2600's. Someone correct
me if I'm wrong, but can't you only use the NM-1E or NM-2W, not a NM-1E2W in
the 2600's
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What you have here is a contradiction in terms. There are no cheap
simulators. Black Box sells a simulator that I know nothing about, but they
do offer 20% for you first purchase. This brings the price down around $1700
I think.
If you check the archives, there is mention of a company in Dallas t
I believe the "best" answer, this is always the kicker, is D. We all know we
are searching for the best answer, or the one the test designer thinks is
correct.
It is the only one that is not a broadcast or network address using the /19
mask.
It is a poorly worded question, but we are faced with
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
