, maybe you could consider 4500/4700M+
with NP-4Ts,
4500/4700 has more horsepower than 2522/2523...
Wilson
- Original Message -
From: Devraj, Prem
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:49 PM
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
Hi Larry,
I want to connect 8 port for a LAB
, September 08, 2003 8:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
Hi All,
I am trying to setup a Lab for my CCIE. I do not have a Frame relay
switch. And it seems to expensive to buy one.
Does anyone have any ideas for a cheaper version of a Frame relay
switch.
My
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
You can use the routers back to back with the v.35 cables..CCO has
A write-up on back-back frame connections..or buy an 8 port serial
Router...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
, maybe you could consider 4500/4700M+
with NP-4Ts,
4500/4700 has more horsepower than 2522/2523...
Wilson
- Original Message -
From: Devraj, Prem
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:49 PM
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
Hi Larry,
I want to connect 8 port for a LAB
was just wondering if anyone has any better ideas then
buying this 2522
Thanks
prem
-Original Message-
From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2003 9 9 14:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
You can use the routers back to back
If you want to do more than j/a frame switch, than a 7000 would be ideal.
Fast ethernet, atm, and frame-relay switch all in one.
- Original Message -
From: Devraj, Prem
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:49 AM
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switch [7:75019]
Hi Larry,
I want
I share my idea with you blow:
Please application 2 ISDN lines and buy 2 ISDN modems, in china, you only
need to pay RMB 50 per month for the lines, so cheap.
Good luck!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75139t=75019
Hi All,
I am trying to setup a Lab for my CCIE. I do not have a Frame relay switch.
And it seems to expensive to buy one.
Does anyone have any ideas for a cheaper version of a Frame relay switch.
My requirement is atleast 8 ports. A friend of mine told me it is possible
to use a ordinary switch
You can get a 2522 with 10 port serial for around $500.
Raj
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75022t=75019
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list
Redistributing is not working for Frame Relay subinterfaces.
R1
inter loo 0
ip ad 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.255
!
inter eth 0
ip ad 172.16.13.9 255.255.255.252
int ser 0.1 point-to-point
ip ad 192.168.12.5 255.255.255.252
frame-relay interface-dlci 112
!
router ospf 1
netw 172.16.13.0
even after being unplugged
and reconnected.
Degracia, Alex wrote:
Make sure lmi is being exchanged.
Turn on keepalives for the pvc.
-Original Message-
From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame Relay
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
When you consider interface buffers are allocated to each
subinterface
Which command displays information about the buffers allocated to the
subinterfaces?
XXX#sh ip int br | inc Serial
Serial4/0 unassigned YES manual up
up
At 6:24 AM + 8/3/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
When you consider interface buffers are allocated to each
subinterface
Which command displays information about the buffers allocated to the
subinterfaces?
Zsombor, interesting observation. I will have to check it; there
Guys,
Very quick one here.
If I have a hub site with 5 spoke sites on an FR network, I could use FR
P2P sub ints or P2M sub ints.
Why would I prefer a P2P over P2M method? The routing protocol would be
EIGRP and apart from broadcast traffic being 5 times more than a P2P
network, why would it
Less IP addresses used?
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guys,
Very quick one here.
If I have a hub site with 5 spoke sites on an FR network, I could use FR
P2P sub ints or P2M sub ints.
Why would I prefer a P2P over P2M method? The routing protocol would be
EIGRP and apart
other folks who do a lot of network installation
think. Over the past few years I've sold quite a few smaller networks, all
hub and spoke, and mostly frame relay types ( although lately that has
changed to more RLAN - ATM to DSL ) In every case I have done things the
subinterface way because I
At 3:35 PM + 8/2/03, Charles Cthulhu Riley wrote:
Less IP addresses used?
Typically, the advantage of P2P is that you can impose individual
policies on each spoke. A basic such example would be bandwidth
matching the CIR if all CIR's are not the same. Spoke-specific
access lists would be
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 3:35 PM + 8/2/03, Charles Cthulhu Riley wrote:
Less IP addresses used?
Typically, the advantage of P2P is that you can impose individual
policies on each spoke. A basic such example would be bandwidth
matching the CIR if all
At 1:40 AM + 8/3/03, Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter wrote:
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 3:35 PM + 8/2/03, Charles Cthulhu Riley wrote:
Less IP addresses used?
Typically, the advantage of P2P is that you can impose individual
policies on each
Per these instructions, I am able to bring my frame connection online:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/frbacktoback.html
However when I intentionally break the connection (Pull the Cable)
the PVC doesn't automatically come back up. Is it because its static to
begin with? I know I'm
Make sure lmi is being exchanged.
Turn on keepalives for the pvc.
-Original Message-
From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame Relay Back To Back Static PVC [7:72869]
Per these instructions, I am able to bring
time I lose line protocol. Carrier resets
are incrementing slowly as well.
Im still suspecting telco issues but any input would be greatly appreciated.
interface Serial0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
fair-queue 64 32 0
service-module t1 clock source internal
service-module t1
the place.
Interface resets increment each time I lose line protocol. Carrier resets
are incrementing slowly as well.
Im still suspecting telco issues but any input would be greatly
appreciated.
interface Serial0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
fair-queue 64 32 0
service
:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: need input on a frame relay t1 problem [7:72621]
I've got a frame line thats almost 100% errors, mostly framing. Local
Hardware is a 1604 w/ t1 wic (for testing purposes only. will be a 3640.)
Remote hardware for the 6 pvc's are 1604's w/ t1 wics on fractional
I have seen this problem before with frame. LMI being local to the frame
switch means the interface does not go down and backups routes do not kick
in. One way to overcome this is to monitor layer 2 by using the
#8220;frame-relay end-to-end keepalive mode bidirectional#8221; command
within a map
Ahh yes.. you can do this also.. pending you have 12.0(5)T or later. The
only issue with that is you might want to modify the frame-relay end-to-end
keepalive timer As you stated, Within the 15 second intervals x3 you are
looking at a good 45 seconds before the WAN interface goes down down ,plus
Thanks Salvatore.
As a resolution, is it only to change the configuration from
main-interface to sub-interface p2p？
If it is only sub-interface p2p, when and how should I use
main-interface frame-relay configuration ? Don't you usually use
main-interface
frame-relay configuration
Masaru,
The main importance of the physical main interface configuration in
frame-relay is to set your encapsulation and or/LMI-Type if you use ANSI or
Q.933a, the default of CISCO is already set for you, and you do not need to
manually configure it either unless you have disabled inverse
Dear all
I have a question about frame-relay. Network Diagram is below.
R1* * *R3
| * FR * |
R2* * *R4
I configured a HSRP between R1 and R2, R3 and R4.
R1,R3 are Active router.(R2,R4 are Standby router)
And I configured standby track in a Wan side of R1,R3.
When I
When you have a FR connection, you have a dedicated circuit to your provider
which then on taps into the frame cloud. So consider it alomost like a
point-to-point link to your local Carrier and then from there you connect
within the providers Frame Switch into their Frame Relay cloud. Now, when
I think frame-relay local-dlci is used for specifying which PVC should
be used on a interface, or in other word tie a interface to a PVC,
especially when using sub-interface. When using physical interface, you
may use frame-relay map command or inverse-arp in case you have only one
PVC
This command is used to to set the source DLCI for use when LMI is not
supported. This command is mainly used for testing of frame-relay
encapsulation when two servers are connected back to back.
Thanks
Azhar
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71591t=71500
It looks like it's used when LMI isn't available
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5187/products_command_refe
rence_chapter09186a008017cf53.html#1059567
Note The frame-relay local-dlci command is provided mainly to allow
testing of the Frame Relay encapsulation in a setting
Hi all,
What is the cisco frame-relay local-dlci command used for ?
Thanks in advance,
Paresh.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71500t=71500
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
I am tryin to use Frame relay switching over IP. Not IP over frame relay. If
we can do that we can connect two sites that are connected over IP from L2
point of view.
Frame Relay
Frame Relay over IP is not yet readily available. The draft IETF
specification was produced
in March 2001. This has
Hi all,
Anybody used Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE Tunnel with Cisco
routers?
We are searching for a solution to deploy Frame relay over IP without using
MPLS or GRE tunnel.
Any help will be appreciated.
Best regards,
Cisco Breaker
Message Posted at:
http
May I ask you what r u tryng to do?
Cisco Breaker wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Anybody used Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE Tunnel with
Cisco
routers?
We are searching for a solution to deploy Frame relay over IP without
using
MPLS or GRE tunnel.
Any
Would be nice to hear if anyone has encountered similars problem and has any
ideas how to get past some of the sometimes animal behaviour of frame-relay.
Setting up a frame-relay cloud; Router A needs to connect to Router B, DLCIs
are given. Disable inverse-arp and install frame-relay map
is working...
Juan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 4:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame-relay on a coffee break... [7:66509]
Would be nice to hear if anyone has encountered similars problem and has any
ideas how
Hi Listers,
Router C has 2 sub-ifs: s0/0.1 has a PVC connected to
router A, and s0/0.2 has a PVC connected to router B.
I want to configure a shared-secret VPN/IPSEC tunnel
between C and A/B.
Ideas, sample configs or references would be
appreciated.
dayo
Disregard previous. After further review, I find the ping failed because I
typed in the wrong ip.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65983t=65658
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Disregard previous. After further review, I find the ping failed because I
typed in the wrong ip.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65658t=65658
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
I am working with the test out simulator.
LAX 11.0.0.2--frame cloudsfo 11.0.0.1
In the frame relay module there is an exercise to connect 2 routers through
a frame relay cloud. Initially, the LAX router is using inverse arp to do
the mapping. A show frame map yields
Serial 1 (up
Thanks All information.
Can anyone recommend the CIR/EIR/Bc in this enviroment? (2 remote and 1 HQ).
I have subscribed the 3 circuit with 128k but I need to provide CIR/EIR/Bc
information further.
Thanks again
Lo Ching
Message Posted at:
can your message be detail moreDeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65714t=65659
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
nice layout
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65588t=65517
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A byproduct of some recent study. Probably should be classed a work in
progress.
Hope it helps
http://www.chuckslongroad.info/OSPF_Frame_Reference.htm
Chuck
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65517t=65517
hi ching,
first i must say, that an LL, is most cost effective when the locations ur
connecing are close in proxemity.
FR will cost you less if the location if far away.
for the location that has bursty traffic, you can either get a 0cir link,
which doe't cost alot, but the amount of traffic
I was told that leased line price depends on distance but frame relay
doesn't. Is this true? Thanks. Yoshi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65397t=65397
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
PROTECTED]
I was told that leased line price depends on distance but frame relay
doesn't. Is this true? Thanks. Yoshi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65412t=65397
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
Dear All,
At first, I have 2 locations so I choose leased line (128k) to connect
together.
Later on, there have another remote site and it need connect to main site as
well but the traffic from this new site is very bursty and not using so
frequently.
Can I use a small FR network with 2 remotes
FR relay is quiet effective, especially with hub and multi-spoke
deployemnts. One of the big advantages as well, reducing interface costs on
the Hub end, as you onely have one serial interface with multiple FR PVC's?
A further solution is to have a xDSL / Cable installation at the remote
sites,
connectivity or similar, then I would use FR.
supernet wrote:
I was told that leased line price depends on distance but frame
relay
doesn't. Is this true? Thanks. Yoshi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65421t=65397
distance carrier, we are working on 271 relief!!
simple huh;)
Dave
supernet wrote:
I was told that leased line price depends on distance but frame relay
doesn't. Is this true? Thanks. Yoshi
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
I would
Our carrier for LL is ATT. Their pricing was intrastate and interstate.
Mileage wasn't considered.
supernet wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was told that leased line price depends on distance but frame relay
doesn't. Is this true? Thanks. Yoshi
Message Posted at:
http
I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay connection
goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the
destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame relay?
Could they perhaps run ATM?
My CPE CO
looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay
connection
goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is, does the
destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run frame
relay?
Could they perhaps run ATM?
My CPE CODest
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame
relay connection
goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is,
does the
destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run
frame relay?
Could they perhaps run ATM?
My
the standards official names are actually FRF8 and FRF5.
Priscilla Oppenheimer a icrit dans le message de
news: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame
relay connection
goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My
Frame Relay connections CAN be fed into an ATM circuit at your provider's
end. The translation is done via the telco.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64944t=64923
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
indeed, much like what happens with frame relay into x25, which gets
encapsulated directely but in the case of FR and ATM there is some
mapping to be done, like the DE field mapped to the CLP, and translation
etc...;
John Hutchison a icrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame
relay connection
goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is,
does the
destination device on the other side of the CO also need to run
frame relay?
Could
more detail from the documentation on
Cisco's WAN switches.
Hope this helps,
Karen
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 3/10/2003 at 5:23 PM DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame relay
connection
goes from the CPE to the service provider
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am looking at frame relay. As I understand it, the frame
relay connection
goes from the CPE to the service provider CO. My question is,
does the
destination device on the other side
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: hepppy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 8:11 PM
Subject: Help making a frame relay switch [7:64224]
Hi all,
Sorry for being Naive. I am interested in creating a lab with some 10 X
Hi all,
Sorry for being Naive. I am interested in creating a lab with some 10 X 26xx
routers. I need to create a frame realy switch. I am not sure what to use. I
have seen a Lab a couple of months back which had 8 DB60 serial cables
connected to the 26xx router. Now I don;t have one of those
-to-back asynchs, I suppose, but I've never
done it myself.
-Original Message-
From: hepppy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help making a frame relay switch [7:64224]
Hi all,
Sorry for being Naive. I am interested in creating
done it myself.
-Original Message-
From: hepppy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help making a frame relay switch [7:64224]
Hi all,
Sorry for being Naive. I am interested in creating a lab with some 10 X
26xx
a signal from the FR switch. Start with the basics and
debug your LMI and see if you are getting info back!
Cheers
Troy
tigers zheng wrote:
Hi,everyone:
I have a question about frame-relay!Please tell me why it
happened?
the topolofy :r1(s0)---(s0/0)r2(s0/1)---(s0/0)r3
r1:2511,r2:2620,r3
I have a question about frame-relay!Please tell me why it happened?
the topolofy :r1(s0)---(s0/0)r2(s0/1)---(s0/0)r3
r1:2511,r2:2620,r3:2621
the configuration:
r1:
interface s0
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
frame-relay intf-type dte
frame
the frame-relay intf-type command is used on a frame relay switch, as part
of the switch to switch config. it should not be used on a customer edge
device.
if you were to enter the frame-relay switching commands on R1 and R3, the
interfaces would come up and the routers would engage in frame
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
the frame-relay intf-type command is used on a frame relay
switch, as part
of the switch to switch config. it should not be used on a
customer edge
device.
He set R1 and R3 to intf-type dte. That should work, shouldn't it? I tried
it on my customer edge
DTE/DCE has meaning at Layer 2 Frame Relay where DCE refers to the Frame
Switch.
DTE/DCE also has meaning at Layer 1 where we determine which end provides
clocking to the line.
They are two seperate configuration points. At layer one the DCE end could
be the switch or the router.
If you are using
did you enter the no shut command ?
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: tigers zheng
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:11 AM
Subject: some question about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973]
I have a question
Serial1/1
yourname(config-if)#shut
yourname(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay
yourname(config-if)#frame-relay lmi-type cisco
yourname(config-if)#no shut
yourname(config-if)#exit
yourname(config)#interface Serial1/1.1 point-to-point
yourname(config-subif)#no shutdown
yourname(config-subif)#ip
running hdlc and check
Daniel Cotts wrote:
DTE/DCE has meaning at Layer 2 Frame Relay where DCE refers to
the Frame
Switch.
DTE/DCE also has meaning at Layer 1 where we determine which
end provides
clocking to the line.
They are two seperate configuration points. At layer one the
DCE end
about frame-relay configuration! [7:63973]
I have a question about frame-relay!Please tell me why it happened?
the topolofy :r1(s0)---(s0/0)r2(s0/1)---(s0/0)r3
r1:2511,r2:2620,r3:2621
the configuration:
r1:
interface s0
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay lmi
I have noticed that the show frame-relay traffic on my routers does not show
that routers have sent and received inverse arp requests. Does any body
know why is that?
Thanks
John Tafasi
r5#show frame-relay map
Serial0 (up): ip 10.10.10.2 dlci 501(0x1F5,0x7C50), dynamic,
broadcast
-if)#encapsulation frame-relay
yourname(config-if)#frame-relay lmi-type cisco
yourname(config-if)#no shut
yourname(config-if)#exit
yourname(config)#interface Serial1/1.1 point-to-point
yourname(config-subif)#no shutdown
yourname(config-subif)#ip address 20.20.20.11 255.255.255.0
yourname(config-subif
configuration, only
ip ospf network statement was changed.
I could not find any document about ospf p2p type vs frame relay inarp.
Does anyone else come across the same problem in the lab?
Thanks
Paul
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63579t=63579
Hi,
the reason is that the serial interface with encapsulation
frame-relay is a point-to-multipoint interface by default.
Inverse ARP allows multiple DLCIs.
If you want to use point-to-point links, you have to use a ptp
subinterface. But then you cannot use inverse arp (it only works
on the main
Hi Mark,
Thanx for reply.but I mentioned that when we do shut no shut again link
comes up.no dlci, no lmi problem:
I am testing in lab setup two rouetrs connnected to frame-relay cloud
Please do help anybody in this regard, why the link doesnot come at one
instant
why it requiers again shut
that when we do shut no shut
again link comes up.no dlci, no lmi problem:
I am testing in lab setup two rouetrs connnected to frame-relay
cloud
Please do help anybody in this regard, why the link doesnot
come at one instant
why it requiers again shut and no shut, when i copy paste
Hi All
Hey I am facing a strange problem in frame-relay
My config
--
my initial config
int serial 0
(nothing confgured initially)
Then I cut paste this config and my link does not come up means Interface
does not come up.
interface Serial0
shut (if i give here no shut then link comes
I would check your settings such as the LMI type, Have you done any other
fault finding yet ? Such as sh frame relay pvc ?
Once you hit no shutdown, the interface becomes live in a way of speaking.
Here is an example of one of my configs.
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame
Systems
Monu Sekhon wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi All
Hey I am facing a strange problem in frame-relay
My config
--
my initial config
int serial 0
(nothing confgured initially)
Then I cut paste this config and my link does not come
Hi Larry/John,
I forgot to mention no shut in the above confif while writing here,
Its still there and connection does not come out
See I mentioned that while giving command by command manually connection
comes out.
It seems to me that while the interface is down during that frame-relay LMIs
think
in show ip interface it shows as protocol down , physical link up.
sh frame-relay pvs shows as inactive.no lmi are exchanged.
Usually Protocol Down, Link Up indicates that you have mismatched
encapsulation, LMI-Type, or even incorrect IP Addressing (wrong Subnet
or incorrect Subnet Mask) between
Hi,
I want to set up frame relay in a lab, are there any emulation software to
mimic the frame relay cloud?
if not, what's the best was of doing this
___
Kerry
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
Clear Day Bkgrd.JPG]
Message Posted
Hi Kerry,
The easiest way of doing this is just getting a cisco router with numerous
serial interfaces and configure it as a frame relay switch. I uase a Cisco
4500 with 8 serial ports in my lab.
Cheers
Troy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63250t=63248
s:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
I want to set up frame relay in a lab, are there any emulation software
to
mimic the frame relay cloud?
if not, what's the best was of doing this
___
Kerry
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
Clear Day B
/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00800ca7eb.html
Jens Neelsen
--- paul dong so wrote:
Hi all,
while practicing frame-relay lmi-n39x commonds, i can not make
the commonds work as they are supposed to be.
Scenario:
frame-relay switch RA
on RA, use lmi autosense. basic FR function works fine
.
Try the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00800ca7eb.html
Jens Neelsen
--- paul dong so wrote:
Hi all,
while practicing frame-relay lmi-n39x commonds, i can not make
the commonds work
Hi all,
while practicing frame-relay lmi-n39x commonds, i can not make the
commonds work as they are supposed to be.
Scenario:
frame-relay switch RA
on RA, use lmi autosense. basic FR function works fine, following config
is abstract only
serial 0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay
When studying for the CCIE with friends, we decided that if you forget the
broadcast keyword, the terrorists win.
--T
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62754t=62614
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE)
Active Inactive Deleted Static
Local 1000
Switched 0000
Unused 0000
DLCI = 114, DLCI USAGE
Message -
From: Dain Deutschman
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:29 PM
Subject: URGENT Frame Relay Encapsulation Failing [7:62614]
Hello,
I have a Frame circuit to my service provider who provides internet access
to us. The PVC is active...I'm able to ping the remote peer...however
...
sh frame pvc
PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE)
Active Inactive Deleted Static
Local 1000
Switched 0000
Unused 00
.
as when u are sending packet to remote network at layer 3 the the next hop
address is looked first to reach remote network and then at layer 2 after
seeing
the frame-relay mapping the frame-relay packet is addressed with the dlci
number
Same error will also come when u remove your mapping
3 locations. Milwaukee, Madison, Greenbay. Milwaukee and Madison both
have a 128k port 64k CIR. Greenbay has full T1 with 64k CIR.
From Milwaukee why is Greenbay's ping response times almost 3 times faster
than Madisons? Wouldn't Milwaukee being the bottle neck of 128k port rate
1 - 100 of 1371 matches
Mail list logo
