On Friday 14 February 2003 10:03 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 08:31, Lorne wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:25 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > Don't really know what my level is... I just send em some every month.
> > > (silver standard something like that.) Any
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 08:31, Lorne wrote:
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:25 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
>
> > Don't really know what my level is... I just send em some every month.
> > (silver standard something like that.) Any who the link is
> >
> > http://www.mandrakeclub.com/modules.php?na
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 08:31, Lorne wrote:
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:25 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
>
> > Don't really know what my level is... I just send em some every month.
> > (silver standard something like that.) Any who the link is
> >
> > http://www.mandrakeclub.com/modules.php?na
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 08:31, Lorne wrote:
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:25 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
>
> > Don't really know what my level is... I just send em some every month.
> > (silver standard something like that.) Any who the link is
> >
> > http://www.mandrakeclub.com/modules.php?na
On Friday 14 February 2003 10:15 am, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 08:26, Lorne wrote:
> ...
>
> > > did that for a long time and it was better than VMWare. However, I had
> > > to give the work laptop back when I changed jobs and had to minimize
> > > the number of computers overall w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorne wrote on Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:28:42PM -0700 :
> >
> > Tried GNUCash yet? I liked it when I had use for something like that
> > (I hate to manage money, I stay away from it when I can :)
> yea, about 6 months ago. It just didn't do it for m
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 08:26, Lorne wrote:
...
> > did that for a long time and it was better than VMWare. However, I had
> > to give the work laptop back when I changed jobs and had to minimize the
> > number of computers overall when I moved (noise considerations, mainly).
> > Still if you have mo
On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:25 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> Don't really know what my level is... I just send em some every month.
> (silver standard something like that.) Any who the link is
>
> http://www.mandrakeclub.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=search&query=
>
> and it's a 30 day
On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:07 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 20:58, Lorne wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:13 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > > _
> > > >_
> > > >
> > > > Want to buy your Pack or Se
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 21:07, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 20:58, Lorne wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:13 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> >
> > > > __
> > > >
> > > > Want to buy your Pack or Services from M
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 20:58, Lorne wrote:
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:13 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
>
> > > __
> > >
> > > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> > > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> >
>
On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:13 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > __
> >
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>
> Win4lin and VmWare both have "trial" versions available
On Thursday 13 February 2003 11:45 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Wow! Thank you very much! Very well written. I was getting ready to
> > lament that it didn't compare it against VMWARE, but he does at the end.
> > I just wish that these guys would do some sort of product you could try
> > before
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 18:52, Lorne wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:11 am, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 09:50 pm, Lorne wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > > I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get runn
On Thursday 13 Feb 2003 2:52 am, Lorne wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:11 am, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 09:50 pm, Lorne wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > > I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get
>> Yea, I just didn't like the look and feel. I tried it. I even
>> imported all my
>> data and worked with it for awhile. Old habits die hard I guess. :)
Ah, ye, it looks a little Winbloz 3.1 to me. Its supposedly the best one
for linux. You might try using Quicken under Wine.
Rob
Want to b
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:52 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> > > Any chance you have Microsoft money working? Codeweaver
> >>
> >> couldn't make it
> >>
> >> > > work.. If I could get either Microsoft money working or find a
> >> > > simple money manager for linux I liked, I'd be 98% free of
>> > > Any chance you have Microsoft money working? Codeweaver
>> couldn't make it
>> > > work.. If I could get either Microsoft money working or find a simple
>> > > money manager for linux I liked, I'd be 98% free of
>> microsoft. At home
>> > > anyways.
Have you looked at GnuCash???
Rob
Want
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 01:00 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:28, Lorne wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:31 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:25, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 18:50, Lorne wrote:
> > > > > On Tue
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 01:19 am, Vahur Lokk wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 05:25, you wrote:
> > Have you tried Kmoney or sqlLedger? There is also FreeMoney (I like the
> > name) and EuroBudget. For just a really nice Check book style
> > accounting system I like CBB (Check Book Ba
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:11 am, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 09:50 pm, Lorne wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get running? I
> > > use it mostly for the occasional doc
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 09:50 pm, Lorne wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get running? I use
> > it mostly for the occasional doc that OOo can't open as well as PSP and
> > DreamWeaver.
>
> Any chance
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 05:25, you wrote:
> Have you tried Kmoney or sqlLedger? There is also FreeMoney (I like the
> name) and EuroBudget. For just a really nice Check book style
> accounting system I like CBB (Check Book Balancer)
Do not know about the others (I am Gnucash user myself)
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:28, Lorne wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:31 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:25, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 18:50, Lorne wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > > > I run Wi
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:31 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:25, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 18:50, Lorne wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > > I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get run
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 19:25, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 18:50, Lorne wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get running? I use
> > > it mostly for the occasional doc that OOo can't ope
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:25 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 18:50, Lorne wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get running? I
> > > use it mostly for the occasional doc that OOo
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:12 pm, Vox wrote:
> This time Lorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> becomes daring and writes:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> >> I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get running? I use
> >> it mostly for the occasional doc
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 18:50, Lorne wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get running? I use
> > it mostly for the occasional doc that OOo can't open as well as PSP and
> > DreamWeaver.
> >
> Any chance you ha
This time Lorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
>> I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get running? I use
>> it mostly for the occasional doc that OOo can't open as well as PSP and
>> DreamWeaver.
>>
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:21 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get running? I use
> it mostly for the occasional doc that OOo can't open as well as PSP and
> DreamWeaver.
>
Any chance you have Microsoft money working? Codeweaver couldn't make i
On Monday 10 February 2003 09:48 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:41, Lorne wrote:
> > On Monday 10 February 2003 03:19 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > > Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Monday 10 Feb 2003 9:08 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > > >>Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > >>>On Saturday 08 Feb 2
This time Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> On Sun Feb 09, 2003 at 05:09:06PM -0600, Vox wrote:
>
>> > succession without a burp. Very odd. I usually find cooker to be
>> > quite stable, but I tend to go this cycle: install release version,
>> > wait until after co
On Sun Feb 09, 2003 at 03:28:24PM -0800, Jack Coates wrote:
> > I'll be setting up CVS so I can commit the entire /etc directory to CVS then
> > on an upgrade I can do stuff like "cvs co" or "cvs diff" to find the
> > differences. Should be an interesting project.
>
> I've always wanted to do th
On Sun Feb 09, 2003 at 05:09:06PM -0600, Vox wrote:
> > succession without a burp. Very odd. I usually find cooker to be
> > quite stable, but I tend to go this cycle: install release version,
> > wait until after cooker has settled down (gcc/glibc upgrades), track
> > cooker during the beta per
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 08:08, Robert Goshko wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 10:18, Jack Coates wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 06:36, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> > > Luca Olivetti wrote:
> > >
> > > > I can lock my 9.0 box at will, just capturing video or trying to use
> > > > full duplex audio (when t
I run Win4Lin 4 here. Just curious.. what can't you get running? I use
it mostly for the occasional doc that OOo can't open as well as PSP and
DreamWeaver.
James
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 07:05, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Saturday 08 Feb 2003 5:10 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > If I
> > wouldn'tn have
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:41, Lorne wrote:
> On Monday 10 February 2003 03:19 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > On Monday 10 Feb 2003 9:08 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > >>Anne Wilson wrote:
> > >>>On Saturday 08 Feb 2003 5:10 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > If I
> > wouldn'tn have
On Monday 10 February 2003 03:19 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Monday 10 Feb 2003 9:08 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> >>Anne Wilson wrote:
> >>>On Saturday 08 Feb 2003 5:10 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
> If I
> wouldn'tn have to interact with the accounting system I wouldn't have
>
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 10 Feb 2003 9:08 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 08 Feb 2003 5:10 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
If I
wouldn'tn have to interact with the accounting system I wouldn't have to
boot back into windows at all.
Have you considered win4lin for that need
On Monday 10 Feb 2003 9:08 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Saturday 08 Feb 2003 5:10 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
> >>If I
> >>wouldn'tn have to interact with the accounting system I wouldn't have to
> >>boot back into windows at all.
> >
> > Have you considered win4lin for that need?
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 08 Feb 2003 5:10 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
If I
wouldn'tn have to interact with the accounting system I wouldn't have to
boot back into windows at all.
Have you considered win4lin for that need? Not everything works under it, but
if your does the feeling of relea
Luca Olivetti wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
BTW, minutes after writing this, my 3 years old son managed to freeze
X (no, not the whole system, I was running mozilla remotely with no
problem), but that's bound to happen with nvidia drivers :-\
Bye
my four year old is the number one source of fa
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 10:18, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 06:36, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> > Luca Olivetti wrote:
> >
> > > I can lock my 9.0 box at will, just capturing video or trying to use
> > > full duplex audio (when the load is high).
> >
> > BTW, minutes after writing t
On Saturday 08 Feb 2003 5:10 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
> If I
> wouldn'tn have to interact with the accounting system I wouldn't have to
> boot back into windows at all.
Have you considered win4lin for that need? Not everything works under it, but
if your does the feeling of release is great. You
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 16:19, Franki wrote:
> That is an awesom application...
>
> I just checed it out...
>
> Only two things I can think of that it needs for use over here..
>
> 1. MySQL support..
It's just so easy to add postgres to your system.. that it should not
be a problem that it does
ion I have been thinking about
writing for ages.. didn't know someone already had.
rgds
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jonathan I. Nori
Sent: Monday, 10 February 2003 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fwd: [ex
Now *this* is the kind of linux application development that gets me
giddy. *grin* Once you can make a business case to replace the back-end
systems of a business with linux, *then* you have a real shot at
converting the desktops (you listening Mark? *hehehe*).
I might have to have Mr. Weaver s
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 14:33, Vincent Danen wrote:
> ...
> I'll be setting up CVS so I can commit the entire /etc directory to CVS then
> on an upgrade I can do stuff like "cvs co" or "cvs diff" to find the
> differences. Should be an interesting project.
>
I've always wanted to do that... I know
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 03:06, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Sunday 09 February 2003 02:05 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > Jack,
> >Told my 2 year old that if he pushed that button his fingers would
> > disapear. (In a calm voice.) He looked at me looked at his fingers
> > smiled and said "No
This time Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> succession without a burp. Very odd. I usually find cooker to be
> quite stable, but I tend to go this cycle: install release version,
> wait until after cooker has settled down (gcc/glibc upgrades), track
> cooker during
On Sat Feb 08, 2003 at 02:07:40AM -0600, Vox wrote:
> > Agreed. It's pretty solid. I did manage to hang my cooker box once or
> > twice, but hey, it's cooker. I expect this sort of stuff
> > occassionally.
>
> I locked my cooker box tonight...after 60 days of uptime (power went
> out, no U
Jack Coates wrote:
BTW, minutes after writing this, my 3 years old son managed to freeze X
(no, not the whole system, I was running mozilla remotely with no
problem), but that's bound to happen with nvidia drivers :-\
Bye
my four year old is the number one source of failure since I upgraded
On Sunday 09 February 2003 02:05 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> Jack,
>Told my 2 year old that if he pushed that button his fingers would
> disapear. (In a calm voice.) He looked at me looked at his fingers
> smiled and said "No daddy" . But he didn't push the button. Take my
> tactic
Jack,
Told my 2 year old that if he pushed that button his fingers would
disapear. (In a calm voice.) He looked at me looked at his fingers
smiled and said "No daddy" . But he didn't push the button. Take my
tactic. The button on the front of the box has been disabled. (I pulled
the
Looks like some people need to discover SQL-Ledger for their accounting
system..http://www.sql-ledger.com been using it for some time and it
is excellent, and even if I was forced to use M$ Win, I would still use
SQL-Ledger as my accounting system.
Cheers
Mark
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 04:07, Jac
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 06:36, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> Luca Olivetti wrote:
>
> > I can lock my 9.0 box at will, just capturing video or trying to use
> > full duplex audio (when the load is high).
>
> BTW, minutes after writing this, my 3 years old son managed to freeze X
> (no, not the whole sys
...
> Agreed. It's pretty solid. I did manage to hang my cooker box once or
> twice, but hey, it's cooker. I expect this sort of stuff occassionally.
...
Clearly you don't own a newer ACPI-based i815 Sony Vaio :-) I've had to
upgrade to a cooker kernel to get it to function at all (2.4.20-2mdk,
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 21:10, Mark Weaver wrote:
> ... If I wouldn'tn have to
> interact with the accounting system I wouldn't have to boot back into windows
> at all.
I bought VMWare 2 for 89 bucks when it first came out and have been
using it ever since to keep a Windows system around for Visio
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 08:52:01AM -0500, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> Mdk 9.0 -- several times per day until 'trigger' found to be
> suspend/resume
I had terrible suspend/resume problems with 9.0 too (crash after every
third or fourth resume). Switching to a stock 2.4.20 kernel has
helped greatly.
et wrote:
would be nice to know more about your lockups, since I don't get lockups. what
easy, I used to use a program called vcr that captures from the tv card
and compresses to divx on the fly. Works (or better, used to work, it
doesn't with recent avifile versions) with 8.2 kernel, immedia
On Saturday 08 February 2003 09:06 am, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> Vincent Danen wrote:
> > Agreed. It's pretty solid. I did manage to hang my cooker box once or
> > twice, but hey, it's cooker. I expect this sort of stuff occassionally.
>
> I can lock my 9.0 box at will, just capturing video or tryi
Luca Olivetti wrote:
I can lock my 9.0 box at will, just capturing video or trying to use
full duplex audio (when the load is high).
BTW, minutes after writing this, my 3 years old son managed to freeze X
(no, not the whole system, I was running mozilla remotely with no
problem), but that's b
Vincent Danen wrote:
Agreed. It's pretty solid. I did manage to hang my cooker box once or
twice, but hey, it's cooker. I expect this sort of stuff occassionally.
I can lock my 9.0 box at will, just capturing video or trying to use
full duplex audio (when the load is high).
Traced the probl
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 23:35:17 -0800 Dave Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Good evening, everyone...
Good morning... sorta.
> On Friday 07 February 2003 09:47 pm, Vincent Danen wrote:
> > On Sat Feb 08, 2003 at 12:10:59AM -0500, Mark Weaver wr
This time Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> On Sat Feb 08, 2003 at 12:10:59AM -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:
>> everytime one of the eh-hem...programs leaks so bad it stuffs the entire
>> system, or explorer craps out and takes down the entire system. pa-Lease!
>> I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good evening, everyone...
On Friday 07 February 2003 09:47 pm, Vincent Danen wrote:
> On Sat Feb 08, 2003 at 12:10:59AM -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > In my experience you've got to try pretty damn hard to break Mandrake
> > linux. For getting work do
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 00:47, Vincent Danen wrote:
>
> Agreed. It's pretty solid. I did manage to hang my cooker box once or
> twice, but hey, it's cooker. I expect this sort of stuff occassionally.
You know, I can probably count on two hands the number of times my Linux
boxes have crashed for
On Sat Feb 08, 2003 at 12:10:59AM -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > Well, that's just a load of crap and you know it. I think I use my
> > workstation just as hard as any Win98 user does... and it's rock solid
> > for me. Don't use the product in any user-workhorse mode? Yeah...
> > right.
> >
> >
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 01:22 am, Vincent Danen scribbled nervously:
> Well, that's just a load of crap and you know it. I think I use my
> workstation just as hard as any Win98 user does... and it's rock solid
> for me. Don't use the product in any user-workhorse mode? Yeah...
> right.
>
>
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 04:01 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 01:01, Michael Adams wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 22:15, Will Styles wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 05:43 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > > > J.P. Pasnak wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > If you want to change it on a
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 04:59 am, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:22, Vincent Danen wrote:
> > On Tue Feb 04, 2003 at 09:54:32AM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
>
> ..
>
> > Well, be that as it may, did DrakX ever advertise this windows-alike
> > behaviour? Did it say tha
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:22, Vincent Danen wrote:
> On Tue Feb 04, 2003 at 09:54:32AM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
..
>
> Well, be that as it may, did DrakX ever advertise this windows-alike
> behaviour? Did it say that if you did a package upgrade install that
> it would do what you seem
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 01:01, Michael Adams wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 22:15, Will Styles wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 05:43 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > > J.P. Pasnak wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > If you want to change it on a per-user basis,
> > > > create an '.Xdefaults'
> > > > file in your home dir
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 22:15, Will Styles wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 05:43 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> > J.P. Pasnak wrote:
> > > If you want to change it on a per-user basis,
> > > create an '.Xdefaults'
> > > file in your home directory and add the following
> > > lines:
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
On Mon Feb 03, 2003 at 08:44:59PM -0800, Jack Coates wrote:
[...]
> > My point is that Win 98 does this. Plainly, or fortuitously, it was an
> > important
> > requirement and goal of installer implementation.
>
> That may be the intention, but a reinstall of Windows over the same
> partition
On Tue Feb 04, 2003 at 09:54:32AM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
> >>Interestingly, a reinstall did not fix anything, like it does with
> >>Windows 98
> >>(but _NOT_ always) - which is a serious requirements or design problem
> >>with
> >>the Mandrake installer.
> >
> >
> >The installer goes with the
On Monday 03 February 2003 05:27 am, tarvid wrote:
> On Monday 03 February 2003 03:40 am, Ron Stodden wrote:
> > Vincent Danen wrote:
> > > Sure, but everything tested out fine with the secteam, with QA, and
> > > with me. Without knowing the symtomd (nevermind the packages), how can
> > > we fix
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 14:54, Ron Stodden wrote:
> Vincent Danen wrote:
> > On Mon Feb 03, 2003 at 07:40:27PM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
>
> >>Interestingly, a reinstall did not fix anything, like it does with
> >>Windows 98
> >>(but _NOT_ always) - which is a serious requirements or design problem
Vincent Danen wrote:
On Mon Feb 03, 2003 at 07:40:27PM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
Interestingly, a reinstall did not fix anything, like it does with
Windows 98
(but _NOT_ always) - which is a serious requirements or design problem with
the Mandrake installer.
The installer goes with the packa
On Mon Feb 03, 2003 at 07:40:27PM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
> >Sure, but everything tested out fine with the secteam, with QA, and
> >with me. Without knowing the symtomd (nevermind the packages), how can
> >we fix it? You presume too much.
> >
> >Tell us what got "clobbered". My 9.0 machines,
On Mon Feb 03, 2003 at 07:28:18PM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
> >>That's inescapably Mandrake's job. N'est ce pas?
> >
> >
> >Sure, but everything tested out fine with the secteam, with QA, and
> >with me. Without knowing the symtomd (nevermind the packages), how can
> >we fix it? You presume
On Mon Feb 03, 2003 at 03:37:37PM +0800, Franki wrote:
> there was one with apache getting loaded with apache 2 updates.. or at least
> trying...
>
> don't know of any other...
apache2 is not in updates.
--
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
"lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vd
Wobo,
I've had it in the previos form. (800mhz version) for about 6
months. Not even a hiccup. Just gotta view the 9.0 errata for the
install trick Only hiccup I've had is that the cdrom drive I bought
doesn't like XP disks (I tried everything) Which to me just means it's a
quality cdrom
al Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
> >> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:32 AM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: Disk corruption - was Re: Fwd: [expert] Best Mandrake
> >&g
Anne,
Agreed and Since they are shaving costs more and more all the time,
I'd imagine Materials and QC are suffering a tad bit as well.
James
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 04:31, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 03 Feb 2003 12:27 pm, tarvid wrote:
> > I am convinced that hardware is a factor in many b
>
> it doesn't work for me :(
> i put those lines at the end of my already-existing
> ~/.Xdefaults, logged out and logged back into kde. but
> i don't get anything other than the usual dull black
> cursor with a white outline. using kde3.0.3, mdk9,
> xfree 4.2.1. what could be wrong? i desparately
more likely it may be you are attempting to run at your hard drives faster
speeds than the MObo, chipset and drives can stand and they are getting noise
and chatter and EMF
On Monday 03 February 2003 07:31 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 03 Feb 2003 12:27 pm, tarvid wrote:
> > I am convince
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:45 -0600, Robert Wideman wrote:
> Then let all go with the new VIA ITX MB's and we will all be fine. FYI,
> 933mhz embedded proc with everything included (www.viatech.com) is $120 on
> pricewatch.com...complete system for less than $400.
I'd really like to see 9.1 deali
On Monday 03 Feb 2003 12:45 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> Then let all go with the new VIA ITX MB's and we will all be fine. FYI,
> 933mhz embedded proc with everything included (www.viatech.com) is $120 on
> pricewatch.com...complete system for less than $400.
>
They look good value for systems tha
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anne Wilson
>> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:32 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Disk corruption - was Re: Fwd: [expert] Best Mandrake
>> yet!!!
>>
>>
>> On Monday 03 Feb 2003 12:27 pm, tarvid wrote:
>>
On Monday 03 Feb 2003 12:27 pm, tarvid wrote:
> I am convinced that hardware is a factor in many bug reports. If bug
> reports included motherboard/CPU/diskdrive we might spot a correlation in a
> matter of weeks.
I think this bears more investigation. I have a feeling that motherboard
based pro
On Monday 03 February 2003 03:40 am, Ron Stodden wrote:
> Vincent Danen wrote:
> > Sure, but everything tested out fine with the secteam, with QA, and
> > with me. Without knowing the symtomd (nevermind the packages), how can
> > we fix it? You presume too much.
> >
> > Tell us what got "clobbere
On Monday 03 Feb 2003 8:28 am, Ron Stodden wrote:
> 3. Mozilla printing just quit with no message.Required rpm -e on all
> the mozilla RPMs and reinstall.
This can happen at any time - it happened to me last week and I had not
changed anything so far as I am aware, so it may or may not be re
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 05:43 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> J.P. Pasnak wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On February 1, 2003 14:52 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> >>Damian Gatabria wrote:
> Only thing I'm left wondering is what happened
> to the cute little
> mouse ar
Vincent Danen wrote:
Sure, but everything tested out fine with the secteam, with QA, and
with me. Without knowing the symtomd (nevermind the packages), how can
we fix it? You presume too much.
Tell us what got "clobbered". My 9.0 machines, with all updates
applied, are rock solid.
Alas! My
Vincent Danen wrote:
On Sun Feb 02, 2003 at 11:01:34AM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
That's inescapably Mandrake's job. N'est ce pas?
Sure, but everything tested out fine with the secteam, with QA, and
with me. Without knowing the symtomd (nevermind the packages), how can
we fix it? You pres
Franki wrote:
there was one with apache getting loaded with apache 2 updates.. or at least
trying...
don't know of any other...
Thanks, but apache is not installed in any of the Mandrake partitions on
either
of the two machines involved.
--
Ron [Melbourne, Australia]
"The problems that we h
>> > There are presently 180 9.0-update RPMs.I would have
>> installed about
>> > one third, so you must see that I would not be prepared to conduct
>> > the enormous amount of research to find out which, and then possibly
>> > to discover it is not one but some combination.
>> >
>> > That's in
ECTED]
Subject: Re: Fwd: [expert] Best Mandrake yet!!!
On Sun Feb 02, 2003 at 11:01:34AM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
> > Specifically what updates clobbered you? I've not had this problem on
> >any of my 9.0 boxes but then I might not have the same software
> >installed you do
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
