Bravo Christopher that did it!
A big thanks...
/j-p.
christopher cuse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24/03/2003 15:29
Please respond to redhat-list
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: understanding tftp
Hi John Paul
I see your error
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:41, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:33:07PM -0500, Joe Polk wrote:
While I would agree with what most have been saying, namely that RH can
do whatever they damn well pleases, I don't necessarily like the trend.
Caldera has consistently alienated the Linux
* Monte Milanuk
The source code for the kernel should be either installed (check
/usr/src/linux) or available as an additional (large) package that you can
install from your install media. IIRC, it goes by something like
kernel-source-versionarchitecture.rpm, i.e.
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 18:06, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Michael Mansour wrote:
I think I've found a bug in RH8's NFS.
On the RH8 client, I can mount the filesystem many
times as shown (df -k output):
The same thing happens under RH7.3 - all of my machines are 7.3 and
I can
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 19:50, Jack Bowling wrote:
** Reply to message from Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 24 Mar 2003
19:27:20 -0700
snip
That said, RH is already beginning to differentiate between Enterprise
and non-enterprise. Since the personal is the base for sales (as in:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 08:29:48 +1100
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right On to that, Stephen!
!-
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 07:52, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
this whole thing was really poorly done.
rday
Yet another reason why my business, and myself are being pushed away by
the
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 23:51, Peter van der Does wrote:
OK,
So here I am, a RHCE 8 exam coming up next week and the weekend after
that RHCE 9 is in the stores.
Should I do it or wait for the RHCE 9 Exam.
First, upgrade your email client to not send HTML. :^)
Then, I'd wait for RH9 exams.
Wait.
Original Message Follows
From: "Peter van der Does" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RHCE Exam, doing it now or wait.
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:51:23 +0100
OK,
So here I am, a RHCE 8 exam coming up next week and the weekend
I'd set up reasonnable system partitions (depending on what you'll install)
such as
50/100 MB for /boot
2/4GB for /
swap (twice ram)
then use LVM for the rest. with LVM you'll be able to increase/decrease
partitions size seamlessly
A 13:00 24/03/2003 -0500, vous avez écrit :
All,
I'm setting
** Reply to message from Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 25 Mar 2003
01:13:40 -0700
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 19:50, Jack Bowling wrote:
** Reply to message from Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 24 Mar 2003
19:27:20 -0700
snip
That said, RH is already beginning to
OK,
So here I am, a RHCE 8 exam coming up next week and the weekend after that RHCE 9 is
in the stores.
Should I do it or wait for the RHCE 9 Exam.
Darn upgrades and darn HTML settings
Peter
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:28:53PM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
Maybe, but I think it is just amatter of not planning on it. The
minimum install is ~450MB. Surely that can be fit on one CD? :^) SuSE
As Matthew pointed, there are several kernels and several glibc shipped
with the distribution.
Alright, so I'm annoyed. Just learning linux, and I've gone through 7.2, 8.0, and
was anticipating 8.1. so now there's 9.0, so whatI've tried to install 8.1 beta
rpms, and there were worse problems than there were with 8.0.
So we copeI'm not about to switch distros so quickly,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:37:41AM +0800, Edward Dekkers wrote:
Other users - seriously - let's not debate over the number hey? Who cares
what it's called as long as it works?
But that's the point, from my view. I *always* skipped the x.0's (in
fact, I skipped the x.1's as well) and reading
I want to port linux(redhat linux 8.0) driver from 32 bit to 64 bit
Intel architecture.
Can anyone tell me what change has to be done in driver code to support
64 bit architecture... or where can I find relevant information.
Will the same change work for 32 bit architecture also.
Any help
Fluxbox loads very slowly when started with
export LC=UTF-8
export LC_ALL=UTF-8
or whatever redhat default installs with, so when I do
export LC=C
export LC_ALL=CLL=C
it loads instantly, before there was like a 5 min wait, how
can I change it so
export LC=C
export
Considering that I'm still having difficulties running my driver correctly
under Redhat 8.0 (any updated kernel, as opposed to 7.3, or the 2.4.18
kernel in kernel.org), I would call it oddball.
--__--__--
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:07:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Michael Mansour [EMAIL
is there a way to mount a disc image without it being on a disc? (
I dont have a burner.)
mount -tiso9660 disk.iso /mnt/cdrom -o loop
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Red Hat has been using this company for quite some time in the mailout of
their 'Under the Brim' newsletter which you can subscribe on their front
page.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
if this is in fact legit, i'm more than a little stunned. who at
red hat decided to provide
Some people may argue they are worthless to start off with.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Billy wrote:
Its not the version number that people care about...the RHCE cert is based
on version numbers. So the big jump in version numbers makes the cert
worthless a lot faster!
--
redhat-list mailing
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:09:02AM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 17:41, Ed Wilts wrote:
[...]
Wow. Red Hat bumped the version number from the expected 8.1 to 9 and
now you're saying people will stop suggesting Red Hat? A disgruntled
user base that simply goes
Not very fancy - but it works (attached shell script).
At some point I plan to add an option to specify the mount point if
/mnt/iso doesn't exist - but simple as it is, I never got around to it
;)
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 01:39, Willem van der Walt wrote:
is there a way to mount a disc image
hi
rpm -q redhat-release and cat /proc/version usually give different version
numbers, what does each mean?
cheng
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the person(s) ('the
intended recipient') to whom it was
Hi John Paul,
Glad that it finally worked out -- but remember to isolate access to a
writable tftp server as it can lead to very ugly security issues.
I was a bit short on message concerning xinetd the other day -- I suppose
that is somewhat synonymous to kernel modules, that is, that kernel
The biggest problem you might run into is some config files in your home
directory that have changed spec, but that has only happened to me once
- I think when going from a pre 1 version of gnome to a much newer one.
If that happens - just delete the config file.
What you want to do - copy these
where is the correct place to add static routes in Redhat?
I know I can add it to rc.local, but is there a RedHat place?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
what is the benefit of LVM on say an 80 GB drive rather than just giving
78GB to / ?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Edward Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I said that I cannot imagine a case where I would want all partitions
on all disk drives to be removed during an OS install. Despite your
claims, I still would never want all partitions on all disk drives to be
removed during an OS install. Not
I had RH8 installed on a Asus VIA board w/ a 900 MHz Athlon.
CPU died.
I built a new box using an Asus A7N8X Deluxe and XP 2700+.
No more was I using the SoundBlaster Live, the VooDoo3, USB was now OHCI
opposed to UHCI, I didn't move the old NIC's over. Only thing that was
the same was the hard
Red Hat Linux 8.x/9.x... is now considered by RH as a bleeding-edge
operating system for consumer use, mainly targeted towards home users,
small business and enthusiasts.
As a significant percentage of Red Hat's revenue is coming from Advanced
Server (Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS), they are trying
* Ian Dobson
what is the benefit of LVM on say an 80 GB drive rather than just giving
78GB to / ?
1. Whenever you buy a new disk so you have 160 GB, you can easily
increase any file system.
2. Whenever you want to reinstall, you can scratch / and /usr, while
you keep the /home and /usr/local
Anthony E. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Douglas Alan wrote:
No it wouldn't. It is never reasonable to destroy large amounts of
data without being quite sure that that is what the user wants.
If that were true, then 'rm -i' would be default behavior, and the
'-f' option would not
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Peter van der Does wrote:
OK,
So here I am, a RHCE 8 exam coming up next week and the weekend after
that RHCE 9 is in the stores. Should I do it or wait for the RHCE 9
Exam.
this close to the exam, do you even have the option of rescheduling?
rday
--
redhat-list
On Stardate : [-29]0032.22
-Tue25Mar03-1240
Tony Preston wrote:
RH 6.2 was a totally different story, it recognized the new stuff, forgot about
the old stuff and booted normally (even recognized the change in video cards!).
I was absolutely amazed (especially after the Win 98 experience).
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 06:03:25AM -0500, Douglas Alan wrote:
It could start by not zeroing partitions on disk drives uninvolved in
the OS installation, since there is no reason for it to do that.
This is the part where I don't follow you.
If partitions have not been created, how is the
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:44:23AM +0100, Jon Haugsand wrote:
* Dan Dobbs
Make sure you have Java 1.1.8 installed. It's rather picky about the
version. You should be able to download an RPM or tarball from Sun.
Doesn't that follow with Oracle?
Every Oracle installation package I've seen
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:12:39AM -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote:
The biggest problem you might run into is some config files in your home
But these are not binaries and is true of almost any upgrade anyway...
What you want to do - copy these files to a floppy:
/etc/shadow
/etc/group
The chipset for the modem is scorpio chipset.Has
anyone found drivers for this chip set to work with
linux.
harish
=
Harish Gopalan
Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department
Boston University
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain;
as far as they are
can someone explain/point to a web page that discusses the
new technology behind the jump to RH 9? that is, NPTL? glibc?
and perhaps how this affects current applications? what will
need to be recompiled and what won't? and how soon matthias
will have a whack of new RPMs up on freshrpms?
Hi Ian,
check /etc/sysconfig/static-routes
cheers
Christopher CUSE
RHCE/CCNA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ian Dobson
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Static Routes
where is the correct place to add
Thanks for the reply (all of you!).
I did read a tiny bit about LVM in the RH install/config documentation. It seemed
like very useful technology, but I stayed away from it for the moment given my
embryonic understanding of the Linux environment.
My setup is strictly for an anonymous
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 06:46:49AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
can someone explain/point to a web page that discusses the
new technology behind the jump to RH 9? that is, NPTL? glibc?
I was given this link but haven't had time to do anything about it:
why doesn't the URL http://rawhide.redhat.com resolve directly
to a location containing the contents of rawhide?
instead, you still have to traverse a fairly generic red hat
directory structure to finally get to
http://rawhide.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide
any reason why it's not
Hi
I'm looking to do console redirection via modem, from all the way from
boot to a fully running system, to allow for better remote management
control. (ie. to allow me to take the machine to single user mode from
home)
Thanks
Mark
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 11:53, christopher cuse wrote:
Hi
Greetings,
I have a directory which has grown, and will continue to grow beyond 650Mb. I
need to back this up to cdrom and haven't found an option in mkisofs that will
limit iso images to 650Mb chunks. I've used cddump for backups, and it limits
the image size but I'm hoping to find something
I'm running RedHat 8.0.
I managed to break gnome-panel, perhaps specifically the window
switcher (pager). As a result when I startx, the panel crashes as it
is being loaded with applets, etc. When I dismiss the crash dialog,
the panel tries to load again and I'm caught in a gnome-panel crash
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Haines Brown wrote:
Oddly, both root and one user experience this problem, but not another
user. I tried simply to remove ~/.gnome*, but when those files were
regenerated, the problem persisted. For both reasons I believe the
problem is deeper.
Have you tried copying
I don't know if I missed it here on the mailing list or not but has anybody
got a link to a page that tells more about the new RedHat 9.0? Basically,
I would like to find out what the main difference is that would make them
go to a new major release. All I can find on their web site is How To
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 11:12:54PM -0500, Greenberg, Michael wrote:
We have customers requesting our products on RH Linux 7.2, RH Linux 8.0, and RH Linux
Advanced Server. I am trying to determine if there is any binary
compatibility statement between RH Linux 7.2/8.0 and RH Linux Advanced
I am trying to install RedHat 8 on a Dell Inspiron 2500 laptop. I can have it boot to
text mode and it works fine. When I launch startx it then hangs with the X mouse
icon. I have managed to trace it's way through the scripts to where it launched
gnome-session in the Xclient script. From
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:10:05AM +0200, Mohammed Awad wrote:
I'm on my way to install redhat 8.0 for resarch purposes. My point is would
I be able to get access to the source code of the kernel or even some parts
of it (which ones?) , in order to modify the source ?
If not, then where could
I have a Tru64 Unix that I want to ssh to from a Redhat Linux, and the Tru64
only allows ssh2. And I also need it to work without passwords.
I have generated a RSA and a DSA key on the Redhat (with ssh-keygen -t rsa
and ssh-keygen -t dsa). I have copied the id_rsa.pub into
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 22:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running RedHat 8.0 on a Dell Dimension Desktop 8200 with a DVD-ROM drive as
my /dev/hdc (/dev/cdrom) device. Whenever I try to run the command below on my
cdrom, also /dev/hdc, I get the following...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# ./hdparm
I have three redhat 7.3 boxes, b1 b2 b3, only b1 has tape drive, I want
install amanda for three machines backup system to tape. I can install
amanda-2.4.2p2-7.i386.rpm on b1, what should i install on b2, b3, in order
to do backup?
Thanks
Jianping Zhu
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 01:43, Edward Dekkers wrote:
I want to port linux(redhat linux 8.0) driver from 32 bit to 64 bit
Intel architecture.
Can anyone tell me what change has to be done in driver code to support
64 bit architecture... or where can I find relevant information.
Will the
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:09:02AM -0700, Bill Anderson wrote:
Given the number of people who avoid X.0 releases, waiting instead for
X.[1,2,3] releases, I would not be suprised to see a slower adoption
rate. Some maye even see the 8.0 - 9.0 as a rush deal, and as a
result be more likely to
Hello,
Regarding the message with this subject on redhat-list:
You can normally use epox boards with either Intell or AMD processors.
The Asus boards can be a problem as they do not always use the same
chipset
maker.
I do not know where you are, but if you are in Gauteng, you can contact
me and
* Jon Morgan
I am trying to install RedHat 8 on a Dell Inspiron 2500 laptop. I
can have it boot to text mode and it works fine. When I launch
startx it then hangs with the X mouse icon. I have managed to trace
it's way through the scripts to where it launched gnome-session in
the Xclient
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 09:30:00PM +1100, Roger wrote:
I had a number of servers running 6.2/7.2/7.3, but as 7.3 won't be
supported after 31-Dec-03 I had to decide what version I was going to
run. Like many people, I don't want phone/email support from Red Hat,
just the errata packages for
Søren Neigaard wrote:
I have a Tru64 Unix that I want to ssh to from a Redhat Linux, and
the Tru64 only allows ssh2. And I also need it to work without
passwords.
I have generated a RSA and a DSA key on the Redhat (with ssh-keygen
-t rsa and ssh-keygen -t dsa). I have copied the id_rsa.pub
I am still a very much Linux newbie, so treat this info accordingly:
You can try to see whether your /etc/X11/XF86Config is configured
correctly. Also try using redhat-config-xfree86 to try to config your X
correctly.
I have Redhat 8.0 on a Inpiron as well with X working OK. If you want I
can
Hi Mark,
I see -- I think that the operative term is remote management -- I have a
couple of Dell servers with remote management cards that allow for console
redirection. this is pobably the most elegant and expensive option :-)
although maybe others could comment if there are cards available at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What's the point in upgrading if you don't need to? My server still
runs 6.2, and has no need for an upgrade.
- -Original Message-
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I try to seach something by author, subject on rehat-list and
redhat-install-list achives. But always failed. For example when i try to
get my previous posts with Author Jianping Zhu, but i can never get
anything. Is there anything special i have to in order to search?
Thanks
--
redhat-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:04:18 -, Zhi Cheng Wang wrote:
rpm -q redhat-release and cat /proc/version usually give different version
numbers, what does each mean?
First one prints version and release of the RPM package with the
name
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 07:26, Søren Neigaard wrote:
I have a Tru64 Unix that I want to ssh to from a Redhat Linux, and the Tru64
only allows ssh2. And I also need it to work without passwords.
I have generated a RSA and a DSA key on the Redhat (with ssh-keygen -t rsa
and ssh-keygen -t dsa). I
Well on the Tru64 machine, everything is a little different... I had to make
a file containing the key, and then another file that pointed to this key,
and then it worked.
/Søren
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Søren Neigaard
Sendt: 25.
XFree86 Version 4.2.0 (Red Hat Linux release: 4.2.0-72) / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 23 January 2002
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
Well, I pulled the RAM and replaced it was some others that I had and
there's no problems now! :)
Thanks again for the help,
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Steven Efurd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: system freeze ...
On
I tried to run the redhat-config-xfree86 utility and it gets as far as making the
mouse icon an arrow. Progress! :) As for the XF86Config, it is the default file
generated by Anaconda at install.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/25/03 08:40AM
I am still a very much Linux newbie, so treat this info
* Jon Morgan
XFree86 Version 4.2.0 (Red Hat Linux release: 4.2.0-72) / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
I'm no expert, but it looks ok. And I now realized that your X system
does not hang in any way, it may be up and running healthy. What you
might miss
im using an RTL8139 SMC EZ CARD, and this site (http://hardware.redhat.com/hcl/?pagename=detailshid=4429)says it IS supported, but whenever i try to activate it, it says it can't. (sorry, im an uber-newbie to linux) all of my network stuff is set to localhost stuff, (it w!
as standard) i dont
I see a couple of problems already. /boot should be no more than 100MB.
Anything more is a waste. / should be way more than 500MB. I know that
some will say I run my entire Linux box on a 486DX66 and 250MB HD!
Well, this is RH8 and given what you're telling me, I would jack that
up. I would give
Bill Anderson wrote:
Given the number of people who avoid X.0 releases, waiting instead for
X.[1,2,3] releases, I would not be suprised to see a slower adoption
rate. Some maye even see the 8.0 - 9.0 as a rush deal, and as a
result be more likely to avoid 9.0. If you avoided 8.0 due to it being a
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 20:27, Bill Anderson wrote:
snip
As an instructor who needs to insall on the sites I go to, I look at it
this way:
The most common use of personal should be optimized for the single disc
install. It decreases the number of discs, and speeds my install. This
is not an
How are you trying to activate it?
When you reboot, you should see a line Starting eth0 during the section
where all the daemons start (charactarized by all the green OK's you
see). Do you see eth0 starting OK? or FAILED? Let us know. Also give us
some idea of what kinda system you're running.
im using an RTL8139 SMC EZ CARD, and this site
(http://hardware.redhat.com/hcl/?pagename=detailshid=4429)says it
IS supported, but whenever i try to activate it, it says it can't.
(sorry, im an uber-newbie to linux) all of my network stuff is set
to localhost stuff, (it was standard) i dont know
Roger wrote:
Some people may argue they are worthless to start off with.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Billy wrote:
Its not the version number that people care about...the RHCE cert is based
on version numbers. So the big jump in version numbers makes the cert
worthless a lot faster!
Those people
I thought I would have a look as well, but got this fail dependencies,
which doesn't make sense to me.
Would somebody explain what this is saying.
rpm -ihv jedit-rhmenu-4.1-1jpp.noarch.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
jedit = 4.1-1jpp is needed by jedit-rhmenu-4.1-1jpp
david
On 21 Mar
Thanks for the detailed reply, Joe!
Well...the box DID boot with that HighPoint card and software RAID1 on the 2 drives.
I'm going to redo it all over again, but with your partition recommendations. No
plans for a Web server, but you never know. This is really just a box for me to mess
with
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 08:46, Jianping Zhu wrote:
I try to seach something by author, subject on rehat-list and
redhat-install-list achives. But always failed. For example when i try to
get my previous posts with Author Jianping Zhu, but i can never get
anything. Is there anything special i
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 09:10, Bored is me wrote:
im using an RTL8139 SMC EZ CARD, and this site
(http://hardware.redhat.com/hcl/?pagename=detailshid=4429)says it
IS supported, but whenever i try to activate it, it says it can't.
(sorry, im an uber-newbie to linux) all of my network stuff is set
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Bret Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 20:27, Bill Anderson wrote:
snip
As an instructor who needs to insall on the sites I go to, I look at it
this way:
The most common use of personal should be optimized for the single disc
install. It decreases the number of
I've been trying to mount a filesystem on an XP machine and I get the
following error:
smbmnt must be installed suid root for direct user mounts (500,500)
smbmnt failed:1
Now, this has worked in the past. I'm not sure if I changed anything,
however there has been one kernal upgrade since I
I've not played with LVM myself, but it would certainly give you
flexibility. If I don't find a buyer for my HP Netserver, I may just
play with LVM myself. For a relatively static server, though, I think
you'l do fine with the partitioning scheme I gave. I build most of my
servers based on such a
When I upgraded to 2.4.20 I had that problem.
As much as I hate making it suid I just went ahead and made smbmount and
smbumount as suid
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 10:33 am, you wrote:
I've been trying to mount a filesystem on an XP machine and I get the
following error:
smbmnt must be
I don't have an .xsession-errors file but I do have .gconf, .gnome etc. I installed
GNOME as my default Windows manager and it is what is indicated in the
/etc/sysconfig/desktop file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/25/03 09:07AM
* Jon Morgan
XFree86 Version 4.2.0 (Red Hat Linux release: 4.2.0-72) / X
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Jianping Zhu wrote:
I have three redhat 7.3 boxes, b1 b2 b3, only b1 has tape drive, I want
install amanda for three machines backup system to tape. I can install
amanda-2.4.2p2-7.i386.rpm on b1, what should i install on b2, b3, in order
to do backup?
Thanks
You need
Try (as root)
lsmod (look if a kernel module containing 8139 is listed - if not)
modprobe 8130cp
modprobe 8130too - if one of the last works it's your setup that makes
problems. (try the setup command at command line)
Post a short summary about what you did to setup your card and include
the
Ed Wilts wrote:
Let's step back and put it all into perspective. Red Hat sent out an
e-mail via chtah.com announcing Red Hat Linux 9, when it would be
generally available, how to get it early, and suddenly everybody's so
annoyed they're jumping distributions? Take a deep breath, pop a valium
Eduardo, you the man! thanks for sending me your config file offline. I'm up and
running after modifying it to use my Intel 815 rather than the ATI Rage 128 Mobility
in yours. It's up and running. I'll have to dig a bit deaper to find the exact
error.
Thanks to you too Jon. I appreciate
Al Sparks wrote:
I'd just like to say, as someone who was just lurking, that this
advice about minicom was great. I had been trying to redirect input
from ttyS0 to a file using
$ cat /dev/ttyS0 somefile
and all I was getting was garbage. I was in the process of trying to
figure out stty
Unless Oracle fixed it I wouldn't recommend using their own JRE. When I
started installing Oracle on Linux servers I had all sorts of problems.
When I replaced their JRE most of the problems went away.
Every Oracle installation package I've seen (admittedly not a huge
number) contains its
mount -o loop -t iso9660 isofilename mountpoint
Jim Wilferling wrote:
Alright, so I'm annoyed. Just learning linux, and I've gone through 7.2, 8.0, and
was anticipating 8.1. so now there's 9.0, so whatI've tried to install 8.1 beta
rpms, and there were worse problems than there were with
Following the discussion over the last couple of days over the release of RH
9 has been interesting. Question: Obviously most of us are very fond of
Redhat, at least up to 7.3 gathered by some of the heated discussion today.
Since I would assume RH would be/is your first choice of a Linux
I had heard a rumor a while back that there was a site which contained
iso's/downloads for every stable release of every major version of Linux
out there. Does anyone know of this site?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Bored is me wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 08:21:00 -0700
From: Bored is me [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RTL8139 issue
im using an RTL8139 SMC EZ CARD, and this site
www.distrowatch.com
- Original Message -
From: John Nichel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:16 AM
Subject: Older Linux Distro's
I had heard a rumor a while back that there was a site which contained
iso's/downloads for every stable release of
Does anyone know if Redhat 9.0 will provide support of XFS (sgi's high
performance file system)? I heard some talk of the new kernel (2.4.21)
supporting XFS. Thanks
--
Ubaidul Khan
Wayne State University
Library Systems
(313)577-4008
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wardle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
A few weeks back, I purchased a new Lite-On 52x52x24 EIDE/ATAPI CD-RW
drive, which supports a buffer underrun technology Lite-On calls
BURNproof (or something similar).
When I first tried to write a CD image
1 - 100 of 314 matches
Mail list logo
