, and this is the root of the build problem. If
so, does anyone know if simply passing -pthreads is adequate? I haven't
been able to find much info about lc_r so far...
Thanks,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send
.
Anyway, if you are running FreeBSD 7 and have trouble compiling the
binaries, remove -lc_r from the makefile - that seems to be working so
far for me quite well. From what I read, you should remove it
regardless and just keep -pthread, but then I try not to believe
everything I read!
Jeff
Jeff
not sound like an XMail issue anymore either, so my
apologies for continuing on here. I will post a final time if I find
out what is going on simply for the sake of posterity!
Thanks,
Jeff
Rob Arends wrote:
This will be a fault where the world uses you public IP to access your zone
hosted on your
, etc.). There is no way (that I know about) for me
to have it query itself just for domains it knows about, then query
external dns for everything else.
Thanks again,
Jeff
Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi Clement -
Perhaps I am using the wrong semantics, or perhaps I am not completely
understanding
...
Jeff
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
As an autoritive dns, why do you want your internal network to go to =
the
'external' dns servers
An autoritive dns server for a zone is ONLY one of the NS listed, and =
theses
NS roles suppose they have a full copy of the zone content.
As many election
By the way, the trace does, and always has, produced the correct name
servers (dns1.buehlertech.net and dns2.buehlertech.net), it just
continues to trace after that result.
Jeff
Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi Clement -
Yes - that is the setup, and the m0n0wall provides NAT to the servers
services
a strange
feeling that it is the correct (to be expected) behavior, even if it is
undesirable in this case. Or perhaps a recent update to FreeBSD is
causing a problem?
Jeff
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Hey Jeff
Seams I did not understood all of your dns server setup.
I thinked you dns only returned
an outside line the trace is fine and does not fail.
Also I don't know what the story is with the other domains - I only have
client reports at this point about unexpected failures. Also, three
weeks ago I was able to send email to trikorausa.com without the
nxdomain error.
Jeff
CLEMENT Francis
, which
might be expected behavior, but I'm not certain. At this point since it
works with SmartDNS it is mostly curiosity.
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote:
OK, just to add to my confusion, here is part of what is going on - this
server also provides
be
worth noting for someone that at very low speeds something is failing
intermittently.
Thanks for your help and input!
Jeff
David Lord wrote:
On 18 Feb 2008, at 12:27, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi all -
Sorry to be late to the game with this - in an earlier list email that I
inadvertently
Hi David -
I spoke too soon! The problem has reappeared, and consistently. So it was
NOT the line speed issue.
I will test SmartDNS settings and post the results. Presently
/etc/resolv.conf is set to the m0n0wall router on the LAN.
Jeff
Jeff Buehler wrote: Hi David - I think I have finally
.
Thanks,
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi David -
I spoke too soon! The problem has reappeared, and consistently. So it was
NOT the line speed issue.
I will test SmartDNS settings and post the results. Presently
/etc/resolv.conf is set
with other services on the same server)?
Does anyone have any ideas or recommendations about how to test where
the problem might be?
Thanks,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help
Hi Harald -
You are right - I just tested it and had assumed that pidfile= set the
location. It's seems strange that it would be hard coded in any application
rather than parameterized. It sounds like the variable mentioned by Tjeerd
might be the way to go.
Jeff
Harald Schneider wrote: Hi
=/var/run/XMail.pid
sig_stop=-kill $pidfile
# read configuration and set defaults
load_rc_config $name
: ${xmail_enable=NO}
run_rc_command $1
I hope that helps!
Jeff
Harald Schneider wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to relocate the XMail.pid file from /var/run to another
location ?
This would
haven't actually tested it.
Thanks for any info about this!
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi davidel@xmailserver.org
To: Xmail Mailing List xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:52 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: xmail 1.24 smtp timeouts
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi Everyone -
I have been getting
. My guess is that 1.24 is slower with the SSL
addition (even not using SSL) than 1.23 and that is cuaing it to hang.
Using ClamAV with ClamSMTP I have only had one virus in over three years
get through, and that due to a failed update the night before.
Jeff
On 2/13/2007, David Lord [EMAIL
! I am about to downgrade to 1.23...
Thanks,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ASSP is great. I sue it with ClamSMTP rather than using ASSP's virus
filtering. I have been running ASSP - ClamSMTP - XMail for several
years now with literally no problems (other than the occasional
misconfiguration issue :)), however I am using FreeBSD 6 (not Windows).
Jeff
Emmanuel
I don't need it right now, but I think it's an excellent idea to add it
if it isn't a crazy amount of work. I can easily see needing it in the
future...
Thanks,
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from
.
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Simon Zarate wrote:
While trying to install, fail and reply with this error.
Hmm, something fishy is going on with the gentoo portage. Either their
package ir b0rken, or they're trying to run XMail in a chroot by doing
port forwarding
after about 6 years of using it, so that's my advice.
Jeff
Clive Lansink wrote:
Hi list. Spam seems to be getting to rediculous levels so I'm trying to
reduce the number of spam messages I am receiving in my xmail server.
I started by uncommenting the line in server.tab:
CustMapsList
with Hotmail HTML email or something... can you clarify?
Jeff
Prakash wrote:
Hi All
i am fresh to linux admin.
In our concern we are using X-Mailserver running on Debian 2.6 Linux.
mails from hotmail is regularly caught as badhtml and there need to manual
release of those mail
Help
to block it,
and you don't want to use something like ASSP (for reasons of purity?),
then your best bet is greylisting (as Rob Arends covers well), RBL
blocking, and perhaps something like you mention with an automated
addition to the spammers list as a last addition.
Jeff
Henri van Riel wrote
to invalid users). So it might be worth looking into
WHY your installation is behaving this way, since it sounds fishy to
me. Maybe 4 threads was too low?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send
is invalid, it simply closes the session. Then you can
forward the email to XMail for final processing.
Jeff
Henri van Riel wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a peculiar problem. My domain (a sub-domain of my ISP)
receives a lot of (spam) email. I'm talking more than 15,000 emails
per day (about 10mb
not certain you would actually cut down the volume
much, and you would end up having to process all of that email. ASSP
will simply terminate the session more or less immediately if it doesn't
like the email, the sender, or the address, or any combination of those
things.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from
the logs as soon
as I can to answer your other question about whether or not the bounce
is seen on the Exchange side.
It sounds like I will need to spend some more time with the logs and
testing on this one - I will let you know what I find - thanks for all
of your input!
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe
failure) follow:
From: buehlertech.net PostMaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:03 PM
To: Jeff Buehler
Subject: Error sending message
[1137780666750.135234560.3ee.banshee.buehlertech.net] from
[buehlertech.net]
[00] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[The maximum number
Thats what I thought should happen, but my Exchange users are verifiably
getting multiple (it seems to be random) bounces back. Only my Exchange
users seem to be affected - users accessing from a standard email client
are getting the correct (single bounce) behavior).
Jeff
Davide Libenzi
of the other applications(?). So, as you
mention, there is obviously something in the configuration that is
causing the trouble.
I will keep looking into it and report what I find for posteritys sake!
Thanks,
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hmmm - ok, let me
think of anything that may have changed between
1.20/1.21 and 1.22 that might affect this?
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Ah ... I was unaware of that setting. It's commented out, which
according to the documentation would seem to suggest
send through it as shown:
Exchange - ASSP (anti-spam proxy) -XMail - Internet - the problem
definitely happens with this flow
or
Email client - ASSP - XMail - Internet - the problem has not been
verified yet with this flow
Thanks,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
has been reached]
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi everyone -
Running XMail 1.22 my users have been reporting that No server found
errors are coming back in duplicate. The mails all come in after The
maximum number of delivery attempts has been reached
:bogusdomain.com [bogusdomain.com]
[02] The reason of the delivery failure was:
The maximum number of delivery attempts has been reached
Thanks again for any thoughts or ideas...
Jeff
Jeff Buehler wrote:
Ah ... I was unaware of that setting. It's commented out, which
according to the documentation
to alternate systems.
Jeff
Chad Fleenor wrote:
I always just tar up /var/MailRoot every night. I have had to restore
this file before because someone deleted a domain. It took me less than
5 minutes to have the domain back up and operational, no one knew that
anything had happened.
Thanks
Kay
belief that you have done what is intrinsically right
(as long as you have stood up for that!). I don't think it's worth
being the conduit for something that you may not be comfortable with.
If you are, then fine, go for it. I wouldn't be, but we all come from
different places!
Jeff
Leonardo
-technical ranting yet again!)
Jeff
Vidmantas wrote:
Jeff,
I understand moral situation quite enough and I'm not looking positive
to the things like spying on people's
letters. I'm asked to make possibility to realize such things, not to
start spying right now.
Boss will make decision. Since I'm
Sönke, thanks again! That will do the trick ...
Jeff
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Hi Jeff,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 23, 2005 8:09
AM:
I am using the cmdaliases functionality to forward certain
emails to an
Exchange 2003 Server. I would like to disable general SMTP
?
Thanks for any input!
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, check out clamsmtp if you aren't running Windows - I'm not certain
if it is faster than the available XMail filters (which I have had mixed
luck with over the years), but it is easy to setup and works well for
me... it is very lightweight and written in C.
Jeff
jonn ah wrote:
hi all
Hi all -
Let me try that last question without the other info: Does anyone know
if XMail 1.22 queries A records when MX queries for a domain have
failed? I realize this has been covered, but I'm not clear on the
specific outcome of this ...
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
if there are
no MX records present. If MX records are present, but none of them are
usable, this situation MUST be reported as an error.
So, any suggestions? Is there a way to prevent the A record query, or
is there another sound reason not to prevent this?
Thanks,
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sat, 15
the mechanism here...
Thanks again for your input on this!
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Let me try that last question without the other info: Does anyone know
if XMail 1.22 queries A records when MX queries for a domain have
failed? I realize
) the
email thread about that. Is anyone else having this problem?
Thanks,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is another verification that it builds fine on FreeBSD 5.4. I
haven't tried running it yet.
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some BSDs
versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the
following version
.
Without at least one or two other people verifying the findings or
seeing the behavior, it probably indicates to an misconfiguration (of
some sort) or an anomaly on your system. Did you try searching the
forums for any similar user experiences?
Jeff
Charlie Qualls wrote:
Hey there Jeff,
I
The forum is an excellent resource, if sometimes challenging to get
through (lots of info and search doesn't always cut it)...
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/
Charlie Qualls wrote:
Hey there Jeff,
Thanks for your thinking this out for me. I'll see what else I can
find. I know that large
-
and this happens ONLY with mail groups that you are aware of? Is that
the gist of it?
Jeff
Charlie Qualls wrote:
Hello Group,
I'm using 1.21 on a redhat server running just mail. I'm having a
issue of mail delivery. The logs say the mail was received ok but
if I go look in the mailbox, it's
is easily
read, and the passwords if passed in plain text are easy to retrieve.
I hope that helps...
Jeff
Ross Gohlke wrote:
I have tried to install the patch linked from the XMail homepage:
http://mail.godeltech.com/xmail/
My specs:
FreeBSD 5.3
openssl-0.9.7d
I downloaded the patch and applied
It would be nice to get SSL working with XMail - if I can get some time
together today, Ross, I will try compiling the SSL patch for XMail 1.21
under FreeBSD 5.4, and see if I can get it working.
Jeff
Alexander Hagenah wrote:
Am 9.9.2005 schrieb Sönke Ruempler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes i
Well, that was easy! It compiled and linked without difficulty on my
FreeBSD 5.4 platform. My openssl is version 0.9.7e, however ... try
upgrading to that and see if you have better luck...
Jeff
Ross Gohlke wrote:
I have tried to install the patch linked from the XMail homepage:
http
would try updating your openssl
either to the newest version or to 0.9.7e (which I know works on my system).
Jeff
Ross Gohlke wrote:
Alas, I'm on FreeBSD! Is there Linux stunnel?
PGP would protect the mail itself, but is a separate issue from securing
SMTP Auth, no? What I'm trying to do right
On FreeBSD there is a port of stunnel: /usr/ports/security/stunnel
Jeff
Ross Gohlke wrote:
Alas, I'm on FreeBSD! Is there Linux stunnel?
PGP would protect the mail itself, but is a separate issue from securing
SMTP Auth, no? What I'm trying to do right now is protect the ACCOUNT
but extremely
large messages. However, if you are processing a lot of email, and
especially allowing large attachments and the like, overall you may feel
the burn!
Jeff
Ross Gohlke wrote:
Jeff Buehler wrote:
By the way, while it is possible, I think the likelihood of spammers
going
How does ASSP flake out - I haven't had any problems with ASSP
(running on FreeBSD 5.x, anyway). ASSP is the best solution I have found.
Jeff
Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
I am not sure if this got through the first time so here goes again.
What can I use that will not cost anything
of bytes, and it has far more options (RBL, filters, domain
blocking, whitelisting, etc.).
Jeff
Eric Garnice wrote:
On 9/8/2005 5:16 PM Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
I have run SpamAssasin on Windows servers (both with ActivePerl and CygWin)
and Linux servers. Running SpamAssassin on Linux
system, which the ASSP mail list would help with quickly.
Jeff
Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
ASSP is great and I applaud anyone using it...
ASSP is easier to set up and use than SpamAssassin. I won't argue that.
However, SpamAssassin offers everything ASSP does and more.
In your post:
It (ASSP
, but I'm not certain ...
Thanks,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
starting to wonder ...
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
On 07.09.2005 19:57, Jeff Buehler wrote:
I could find no reference to this anywhere - I occasionally have senders
that send, and the email does not stop sending, like a SPAM bomb, but
these are valid senders. I assumed the first couple of times
that you have it with many domains rather than just
those two.
Rob, are you outdide the U.S.?
Edinilson, are you seeing the problem with Windows 2000 also or with
some other OS? What is your config since seem to have confused Robs
with yours?
Jeff
Rob Arends wrote:
Ok, I hadn't noticed anyone
with other
domains periodically or consistently? Are Hotmail and Yahoo noticeably
suspect, or just as likely to fail as others?
Jeff
Rob Arends wrote:
I think you may be meaning me when you say Edlinilson.
Re Point 6, I did mention that I have the problem with other MTAs that have
an A record
to you! I don't think anyone is ignoring XMail
under Windows, but finding any possible bug without being able to easily
replicate it is extremely difficult...
Jeff
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : Edinilson J. Santos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 2
What would you look for in a tcpdump like this? I am technical (years
of c/c++/PHP/Perl programming) but I am clueless about tcpdumps...
pardon my ignorance!
Jeff
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
On 02.09.2005 17:07, Davide Libenzi wrote:
In the hotmail case, that sure has DNS configured like
/
Sönke, Davide, do you agree with that?
Jeff
Edinilson J. Santos wrote:
Our firewall gateway is a freebsd.
Which level of tcpdump do you want?
I can send you everything that you want, just tell me what.
Edinilson
-
ATINET-Professional Web
seem to be
related to that.
Jeff
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : jonn ah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 31 août 2005 10:31
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: messages to yahoo and or hotmail does not get
delivered
Hi all,
would
? It seems to me it might be helpful if people
with this problem published relevant system data so that we can see what
the commonalities are to isolate the problem... just a thought.
Jeff
Edinilson J. Santos wrote:
I'm using the same solution that Francis described without problems.
Try
I like the 3d look myself, so
http://www.fonsy.com/XMail_IAN88x31.2.jpg; is also my vote. It's also
relatively easy to read at a small size, and uses elements of the
original logo so that brand recognition is maintained.
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Rob Arends wrote
of
the attachments, but I am reasonably certain that it would have caught
all of them regardless - I have had great success with clamSMTP.
Jeff
John Kielkopf wrote:
Anyone else scanning mail with ClamAV?
With just telling ClamAV to scan the message file supplied by Xmail,
It'll miss a number
. I
prefer it over Spam Assassin myself.
Jeff
John Kielkopf wrote:
Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi John -
I use clamSMTP - it is c based proxy that is very lightweight and easy
to use. I also use ASSP in front of this for anti-spam (so sender -
ASSP - clamSMTP - XMail - sendee). As it turns
with this number of users some people want mail from
Costco and some people don't, so there is no perfect solution.
Jeff
John Kielkopf wrote:
Jeff Buehler wrote:
I simply disallow email of greater than 5 mb (that was my cutoff
exactly!) - email is not ideal for large file transfers
Try telneting to the SMTP port (25) to make certain it isn't blocked.
Your ISP may be blocking port 25 (most of them are these days).
i.e. telnet mail.yourdomain.com 25
or by ip
telnet xx.xxx.xxx.xx 25
Jeff
Larry Azlin wrote:
Greetings.
I run Xmail 1.21 on a SUSE 9.0 box to host my
By the way, Sönke, the solution you outlined is working perfectly - thanks!
Jeff
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Hi Eric,
On 18.07.2005 20:38, Eric Garnice wrote:
I have an XMail server in front of an Exchange server solely doing
SpamAssassin. A problem arises where missed spam is sent
exists!
Thanks,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
In the meantime, I am going to turn on RemoveSpoolErrors as you
mentioned just so I don't have to go empty out the undeliverable queue
every three days manually.
Thanks again!
Jeff
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Hi Jeff,
On 17.07.2005 22:53, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Does anyone know of an existing solution
Thanks! I'm doing it right now ...
Jeff
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Jeff,
On 17.07.2005 23:10, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Thanks, Sönke -
I was hoping to keep them in the queue for awhile, but I am collecting
500 or more undeliverables a day presently since I am forwarding to a
domain
kind of response, even though I
have a proper PTR (reverse) record for each of these domains.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message
Hi Sönke -
Thanks for your reply -
Presently my [SmtpServerDomain] is set to buehlertech.net, does it
require the prefix (i.e. mail or mail2.buehlertech.net)?
Jeff
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
On 15.07.2005 21:31, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi everyone -
I am running XMail 1.21 on FreeBSD 5.4
Hi Sönke -
When I change [SmtpServerDomain] by adding the prefix (mail2) then the
resulting greeting is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is that correct? I wasn't expecting the numeric value before the domain...
Jeff
Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi Sönke -
Thanks for your reply -
Presently my [SmtpServerDomain
of different IP:PORT combinations.
Clarity at last... :)
Jeff
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, July 07, 2005 2:16
AM:
Maybe its some sort of security related bug in Thunderbird
that allows
it to authenticate across 2 different IP's?
Are you sure that TB does not send
, though, and that is great ...
Thanks,
Jeff
Rob Arends wrote:
Jeff,
Smtp auth is enabled by default, and there does not seem to be a way to turn
it off (why would you?), however I know the EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 1
is configurable and is turned on by default.
*ALL* my users are told to use smtp
because, as another use kindly pointed out recently, why not?
Thanks again for your input, Davide!
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Yes, the email client (in this case Thunderbird and numerous other
external email clients) must be doing pop before smtp since
not), so it would seem to be an issue of ASSP not waiting
properly for an authentication response or something. At any rate, I am
satisfied with the solution of SMTP authentication now that I know it is
not abnormal behavior to have it working.
Thanks,
Jeff
Sönke Ruempler wrote
across 2 different IP's?
Thanks, Rob...
Jeff
Rob Arends wrote:
Jeff, your email below answers it.
How can xmail correlate the popb4smtp, if the smtp is actually ASSP.
POPb4 only works if the same server is running both port 25 and port 110.
In your case xmail will see the smtp connection coming
was hoping someone on the
XMail side might have some ideas ...?
Thanks!
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
users using smtp authentication, and it works (so far).
Should I be concerned? This must be some funky ASSP thing ... but I am
(pleasantly?) suprised that XMail allows it to verify even when it is
not set to do smtp authentication (or at least I didn't think that it was!)
Jeff
Jeff Buehler
when ASSP was on a seperate IP and a seperate platform - with that
config, pop before SMTP worked for all these email clients. Also this
was not the case when ASSP was not in the picture (so obviously it has
something to do with ASSP - XMail).
Jeff
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005
and 587, and can't support any more IP/PORTs. So, there was no
MTA running on 127.0.0.1:25 - I added this to XMail, and now I am
waiting to see if I start getting some emails from the system!
If not, I will send out another email with info and questions...
Thanks...
Jeff Buehler wrote:
I have
-bd port? I'm sorry - I don't know what to do with that. A flag to the
sendmail daemon, or some other archaic invocation?
You are of course correct about the assumption thing - I can't seem to
help it.
Thanks,
Jeff
Alexander Hagenah wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Friday, July 01, 2005
sendmail modes under FreeBSD (/etc/rc.conf -
sendmail_enable= yes, no or none - none kills it completely, no allows
it to do local redirecting to XMail so far until today).
Thanks,
Jeff
Alexander Hagenah wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Friday, July 01, 2005 4:45 PM:
Anyone know much
address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Just to say that for me, free os will win the battle, especially
in small business and finaly at home, only when a comprehensive,
easy to use, complete admin gui will be available for use by
anyone without big knowledge.
This will help
filter, although at first look doList seems to be a pretty
weak anti-spam solution - it's just a filter without Bayesian analysis or
anything.
Jeff
Yann LE ROCH - Agence CHROM wrote: Hello I use
http://software.dolist.net/xscanner.asp[1] on my xmail 1.18 (windows 2000
server) I just want to know
any wars! Certainly never my
intention - there are enough ridiculous wars around without my help (um,
I hope that doesn't start another discussion!)
Jeff
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : Jeff Buehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 22 juin 2005 18:30
À
:
Jeff Buehler wrote:
However, ASSP (nor ClamSMTP nor ClamAV) do not run on Windows.
FYI -
http://www.clamwin.com/
(Not that I run xmail on Windows, but just to clarify.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
already up and running?
Yann, since you are on Win 2000, you might want to try that -
ASSP-Xmail or better ASSP-anti-virus(?)-Xmail. That combination
works really well for me, although I have no idea about stability and so
on under Windows for ASSP or ClamAV.
Jeff
Kroll, David wrote:
I run
. This is actually how I do it.
The process you have running I'm not so certain about - sendmail still
looks active, but given what you wrote I don't know in what mode.
Jeff
Ross Gohlke wrote:
The good news is, XMail is finally running properly. The bad news is, I'm
not exactly sure how
. Hopefully the FreeBSD team will fix this bug before too long -
they have been advised about it, but I don't know it's status...
Jeff
David Lord wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18 Jun 2005, at 14:08, Ross Gohlke wrote:
Which version of XMail?
1.21 from
recall with this configuration).
Jeff
David Lord wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Jun 2005, at 18:52, Ross Gohlke wrote:
Which version of XMail?
What are outputs of: 'lsof | grep -c XMail' and '/sbin/sysctl
kern.openfiles'?
I ran XMail 1.17 on FreeBSD 4.10 for some
(?), 514 (?),
6017(XMail CtrlClnt) -
Maybe you need different command parameters for XMail than you have
presently - you might try specifying the ports you want XMail to listern
on for SMTP instead of all ports.
Jeff
Ross Gohlke wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Ross Gohlke
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
