Re: OSPF aggreation question [7:26091]
Ok Here it is, this is how we tackled the OSPF Aggregation problem. To properly aggregate addresses within an internal type OSPF advertisement you must use the Area x range statement, this would not work because of the multi area setup and non-contiguous addresses. Stabilization of area 0 was a must because of the service provider environment, as well Link state changes would be constant due to customer networks. This would prevent us from using standard type areas due to routing table size and link state flapping. We needed to reduce the size of area 0 with summarization on the ABR's and keep all routes local to the areas to reduce the overall size of the routing table. We used NSSA areas because of one major feature "type 7 LSA's". What this allowed us to do is convert all routes to external type routes and aggregate the mutli areas on the ABR's. External type routes can be summarized using a summary statement with the summary being non area specific. To do this within an NSSA area you simply add the statement redistribute connected with some sort of filter like a prefix list and route map combination to prevent un-wanted routes, If you have any static routes you redistribute the static routes with the redistribute static statement with the same sort of filter control. This will convert all the area routes to type 7 LSA's (which are external) and allow you to summarize the routes with the summary-address command. Cool Huh ... Mark Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26345&t=26091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco VPN between two site on the same IP scheme [7:26346]
Hello, I've got two sites which use the same IP address (but there is no duplicate IP address) and I want to encrypt the serial link between them. So is it possible to create a VPN with a bridging configuration ? or do I need nat ? regards, steve __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26346&t=26346 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
authentication [7:26347]
Hi, I have AS5300 on which we have 7 E1 ISDN-PRI from differet telcom and using "Radiator2.18 " radius. I want that a particular user shold be authenticated by radius which is connected on serial1/1:15 not on other ports not on another port how can i do this .Plz help me kaushalender Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26347&t=26347 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX line up protocol down [7:26349]
Hi Guys I have a pix 520 that has 3 interfaces configured. Ethernet 1 and 2 are normal and have line up, protocol up. Ethernet 0 is down with line up , protocol down. There is a link light on both the Ethernet 0 interface and switch port. This is not a duplex issue since I have already set the Ethernet 0 interface to auto negotiate and back to 100full. Has anybody got any ideas?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26349&t=26349 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Nortel DMS100 -> 5300 Voip Overlap [7:26348]
This is a fine group and I lurk here often, please help if you can... Does anyone experienced problems on VoIP GWs receiving digist by overlap from DMS100 PBX? I started to be pretty tired hearing these Nortel guys telling every third sentence something like "Nortel is best, DMS is GOD - scrap your Ciscos" Primary I want to solve the problem - nevermind the problem is here or there. Thanks, Zdenda ! isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn voice-call-failure 0 ! voice class codec 1 codec preference 1 g729r8 bytes 40 ! fax interface-type modem mta receive maximum-recipients 0 ! interface Serial0:15 no ip address ip mroute-cache isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn overlap-receiving isdn incoming-voice modem isdn sending-complete no fair-queue ! voice-port 0:D echo-cancel coverage 32 no comfort-noise cptone CZ timeouts interdigit 5 ! dial-peer voice 100 voip preference 1 destination-pattern 0036T voice-class codec 1 session target ras tech-prefix 5477 ip precedence 5 no vad ! dial-peer voice 1 pots huntstop destination-pattern 00420T direct-inward-dial port 0:D prefix 0 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26348&t=26348 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GIGASTACK Details [7:26350]
Hi Group! I'd like to know how to find out the MAC-Adress of the Switches on opposite side. It looks difficult to find out on what port of GIGASTACK Module what opposite Switch is connected if it wasn't documented. I can only see Port1-UP - Port2-UP. All tips and tricks are very much appreciated! Thanks in advance Valeri Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26350&t=26350 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: ACC Tigris [7:26351]
I am looking for an equivalent mailing list for former ACC Tigris Routers/Software and now part of Ericsson's Datacom products in regards to bgp configuration and implemenation. I have done a numerous searches and nothing specific is showing up. Any links, urls will be apreciated cheers ./.bosire -- ___ +$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$ richard bosire ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26351&t=26351 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ip Telephony question [7:26344]
I took the class with the guy who wrote the test. Basically it covers everything that was listed in class. Different designs, the locaton of the menu's on the web page, the features of the phones, etc. To be honest, it the easiest test at Sylvan. You should be more worried about the certification.net test's for EVODD and PBX fundamentals. ""Cisco Breaker"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > I will take the IP Telephony 9E0-569 CIPT tomorrow, so any last minute > advice for me. If anyone taken this exam before what is the mostly questions > based on? I did not understand very well the last 3 chapters which are > CallManager Architecture, Call Preservation and Media Resources, WAN Design > Considerations. What is the percentage of these 3 chapters in the exam? > > Any help will be appreciated? > > Best regards, > > Cisco Breaker Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26352&t=26344 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about BGP [7:26353]
Hi. I am trying to configure two routers as BGP peers . Routers (both) are on the same LAN but in diffrent subnetworks. I mean, routers can ping eachother , since there is another router between them. But , they can not establish BGP connection as two neighbours. Does that mean they have to be dirctly connected to eachother.? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26353&t=26353 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE#8387 [7:26309]
Top man - Well done Let us know all about it (NDA Permitting) when you wake up Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26354&t=26309 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dial into Router [7:26289]
Garbage indicate difference in connection speed Dvass 416South wrote: > > > I'm able to get this modem to dial into the router just fine. > Problem is still driving me nuts is that all the characters are > showing up as garbage ( ø ~ using Hyperterm and have tryed with other programs as well. > Has anyone been successful with dialing into routers that may > have had the same problems? > I'm using a USR modem set at > 9600 baud > flow control hardware > Emulation is VT100 > > > Thanks > > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26355&t=26289 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dialer Profiles - IPCP doesn`t come up ! [7:26232]
I've faced a similar problem in the past If you think that the configs are correct, try to upgrade the IOS on the 801. My problem was solved immediately. Dvass Hans Schimek wrote: > > I am trying to implement a dial-up connection to a remote site ( > Cisco2611 dials to Cisco 801). > I am using Dialer Profiles with CHAP Authentication. > The config seems to be OK - the router is dialing - > authentication is > successful - and the line changes to UP. > except the IPCP-State - which won`t come UP.. > =20 > Thx > hans > =20 > - > DI(FH) Hans Schimek > Systems Engineer=20 > NTS Netzwerk Telekom Service > Gesellschaft m.b.H & Co KG > Lemb=F6ckgasse 49/1/B > A-1230 Wien > Tel: +43 1 867 67 76 - 13 , Fax: +43 1 867 67 76 - 56 > Web: , =20 > -=20 > NTS Vertrieb: [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 > NTS Support:[EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 > NTS Training: [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 > -=20 > =20 > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26356&t=26232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE#8387 [7:26309]
Good Work Nigel. Always nice to see somone succeed. Eric CCNP --- Nigel Taylor wrote: > Well as it would turn out it's my turn to write that > awesome email... I just > got back from RTP today where after checking my > email, I was awarded > CCIE#8387. What a journey/process this has been and > I must say that I'm > relieved that it's now over. After countless hours > of study and practicing > on > the "rack" the reward was most definitely worth the > sacrifice. > > I didn't sleep a any last night as I awaited the > results of my lab score > which > I was unable to check until 12 noon today. So on > that note I'm off to catch > up > on the sleep that escaped me last night. > > More to follow once I get rested up.. > > Nigel Taylor > CCIE#8387 and all that other stuff.. :-> [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26357&t=26309 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: about BGP [7:26353]
To Configure BGP on Non-directly connected neighbors, you use the following command Router bgp AS neigbor X.X.X.X ebgp-multihop N Where: AS is your AS number X.X.X.X is the Ip address of the remote Peer N is the maximum number of hops between the 2 peers (N is reccomended but not required.) Good Luck, Ejay -Original Message- From: Ihsan Turkmen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: about BGP [7:26353] Hi. I am trying to configure two routers as BGP peers . Routers (both) are on the same LAN but in diffrent subnetworks. I mean, routers can ping eachother , since there is another router between them. But , they can not establish BGP connection as two neighbours. Does that mean they have to be dirctly connected to eachother.? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26359&t=26353 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: about BGP [7:26353]
You need to use bgp multihop if there is a hop in between... -- -=Repy to group only... no personal=- ""]hsan Turkmen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi. > > I am trying to configure two routers as BGP peers . Routers (both) are on > the same LAN but in diffrent subnetworks. I mean, routers can ping eachother > , since there is another router between them. But , they can not establish > BGP connection as two neighbours. Does that mean they have to be dirctly > connected to eachother.? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26358&t=26353 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"QuizWare" vs. "Boson" [7:26361]
What are the differences, if any, between the QuizWare and Boson IE written practice test(s)? Is the QuizWare better than the Boson? Tim Booth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26361&t=26361 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can frame-relay multipoint sub-interfaces support inverse arp?? [7:26362]
Hi, I was a bit confused after reading the Ciscopress CCNP Support book and Caslow's ccie book. Can frame-relay multipoint sub-interfaces support inverse arp DLCI mappings?? Ciscopress Support book seem to say no (not directly though) but Caslow's book says yes. Thanks in advance... David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26362&t=26362 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Output Queue Drops [7:26363]
Question for all: How can I prevent Output drops if an interface is set for full-duplex 100Mb on a 6509 (weighted queue)? One of my customers said that he is seeing a large amount pings lately. I asked if anything was new and he did say they added a game recently - coincendence??? They always think we did something first thing.. Any help is appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26363&t=26363 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE#8387 [7:26309]
Congratulations Nigel! I bet today it is starting to sink in a little bit. It must feel incredible to have all of the hard work and time spent finally pay off. Outstanding accomplishment. Having just passed the written exam, I am just starting to get my feet under me for the long road that I must travel to achieve the goal. It is great and inspiring to see the result of the dedicated effort on the part of someone as determined as you have obviously been. KUDOS!!! Pat -Original Message- From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 6:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE#8387 [7:26309] Well as it would turn out it's my turn to write that awesome email... I just got back from RTP today where after checking my email, I was awarded CCIE#8387. What a journey/process this has been and I must say that I'm relieved that it's now over. After countless hours of study and practicing on the "rack" the reward was most definitely worth the sacrifice. I didn't sleep a any last night as I awaited the results of my lab score which I was unable to check until 12 noon today. So on that note I'm off to catch up on the sleep that escaped me last night. More to follow once I get rested up.. Nigel Taylor CCIE#8387 and all that other stuff.. :-> Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26364&t=26309 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX line up protocol down [7:26349]
Are you using a strait-thru or cross-over cable ? - Jay C Creasy Cisco Certified Network Professional + PIX Microsoft Certified Professional Inet Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM ID HaltItAll Work # 713-548-3346 Home # 713-263-1939 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kent Hawkins Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX line up protocol down [7:26349] Hi Guys I have a pix 520 that has 3 interfaces configured. Ethernet 1 and 2 are normal and have line up, protocol up. Ethernet 0 is down with line up , protocol down. There is a link light on both the Ethernet 0 interface and switch port. This is not a duplex issue since I have already set the Ethernet 0 interface to auto negotiate and back to 100full. Has anybody got any ideas?? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26365&t=26349 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Output Queue Drops [7:26363]
My suggestion would be to turn off WFQ. I don't believe it's recommended on really high speed interfaces. I think FIFO is a better option for a FastEthernet link and I've read that WFQ in that situation can actually cause some performance degradation. Do you have a need for weighted queueing on this interface? John >>> "John McCartney" 11/15/01 7:43:57 AM >>> Question for all: How can I prevent Output drops if an interface is set for full-duplex 100Mb on a 6509 (weighted queue)? One of my customers said that he is seeing a large amount pings lately. I asked if anything was new and he did say they added a game recently - coincendence??? They always think we did something first thing.. Any help is appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26367&t=26363 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ipx in 6500 [7:26326]
Place "IPX type-20-propagation" on each interface in question. Also make sure that you are routing IPX - "Show IPX Route". -Original Message- From: cage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ipx in 6500 [7:26326] I want to play DF3 lan/ipx in my company over more than one vlan, i have built the vlan for ipx, but the DF3 did not work, no server was discovied in the 6500. i don't know if the DF3 lan/ipx server can provide the sap service. what can i do? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26366&t=26326 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Output Queue Drops [7:26363]
Many games these days do constant ping times. Quake style games give constant ping times on the screen. If they added a Quake style server then it definitely takes pings from users connected. - Original Message - From: John McCartney To: Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:43 AM Subject: Output Queue Drops [7:26363] > Question for all: > How can I prevent Output drops if an interface is set for full-duplex 100Mb > on a 6509 (weighted queue)? One of my customers said that he is seeing a > large amount pings lately. I asked if anything was new and he did say they > added a game recently - coincendence??? They always think we did something > first thing.. Any help is appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26368&t=26363 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "QuizWare" vs. "Boson" [7:26361]
QuizWare" vs. "Boson both are similars Sibex book JNC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26369&t=26361 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "QuizWare" vs. "Boson" [7:26361]
Same format, same questions... Dvass Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26370&t=26361 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Output Queue Drops [7:26363]
We don't use WFQ on our FE, so can anything be done to stop these pings or the frequency of them? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26371&t=26363 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: about BGP [7:26353]
BGP rides on top of TCP and BGP's default TTL is 1. Therefore to run BGP you must be directly connected, unless you implement ebgp multi-hop. Which allows you to reconfigure BGP's TTL value so that you may establish a BGP session with that neighbor that is not directly connected. HTH, Chris Christopher A. Kane CCNP/CCDP Technical Support - Solution Center/Hilliard UUNET/WorldCom -Original Message- From: Ihsan Turkmen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: about BGP [7:26353] Hi. I am trying to configure two routers as BGP peers . Routers (both) are on the same LAN but in diffrent subnetworks. I mean, routers can ping eachother , since there is another router between them. But , they can not establish BGP connection as two neighbours. Does that mean they have to be dirctly connected to eachother.? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26372&t=26353 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: All you veterans... [7:26301]
Good luck getting any money back. I sent the requested info in and they sent it back (3 months later) requesting info I could not provide. They want all kinds of info on your offical transcripts and blah, blah, I thought the paperwork shuffle would end when I got out. I even sent an official complaint about the info they are requesting and how we as test takers can not provide the information on the transcripts and they basically said @!#$ you, too bad. Thanks for nothing again VA. ""Sal DiStefano"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Funny the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America is on the list > but not Cisco. > > I called and they said to send it in and they may pay for it anyway. > > Sal > - Original Message - > From: "Jeff D" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:32 PM > Subject: All you veterans... [7:26301] > > > > Check it out for reimbursement: > > > > https://www.gibill.va.gov/Education/LCVets.htm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26373&t=26301 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: where exactly is the equipment replicated ? [7:26243]
42 is the answer to the life, universe and everything (Hitchhikers Guide BBC TV, Radio and book) but what is the question ;-) Rah Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26374&t=26243 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF transit areas across non-OSPF interfaces [7:26377]
I'm really quite confused by this. I am working through a lab currently which uses OSPF, EIGRP and BGP. I haven't reached the BGP bit yet which is okay, but there is an OSPF/EIGRP bit I don't get. ++ +---+ +---+ | | | | +-+ | +---+ R1| s0 |s1 |---| s0| | s1 | R2 +-+ | +---+ | | | | OSPF | EIGRP| OSPF | | OSPF AREA 1 | | AREA 0| | AREA 2 ++ +---+ +---+ I realise that if R1-S1s network were placed into Area 0 then everything would flood through regardless of EIGRP. If I put R1-S1 into another OSPF Area - 3 say - then I could set up a virtual link. As this lab is presented to me, neither of those are options. In effect I want to use EIGRP as a transit area to allow the OSPF Area1 to connect to the OSPF Area0. How do I do this? I have searched quite hard around the web and come up with nothing other than virtual-links through an OSPF area which is a technology I understand - in concept at least. Anyone point me to anything to explain this? cheers Danny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26377&t=26377 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best sniffer [7:26030]
Free then it is ethereal.com...
Willing to pay... Sniffer pro..
Make a choice.
Murali
""Ali Mesdaq"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> whats the best sniffer? i want one thats intuitive and powerful.
> something that can unwrap packets to the data content and if possbile
> let you view communications between machines by orginizing the packets
> for you. if its free that would be good too
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
The information contained in this communication is Confidential and is
intended only for the exclusive use of the Recipient named above, and may
contain confidential or privileged Information. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient ,please notify Freddie Samuel
immediately either at +968- 684152 Extn 398 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26376&t=26030
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Salary Expectations/CCNP's!!!!!!!!! [7:25805]
Ah, the intolerance of it all... I answered this guy because he needed help. I did the research long ago, and put him in the ballpark. Of course, the rest of the knowledge is up to him. By the .signature involved I surmised this was a 'working stiff'. Have a little empathy. Some here have exhibited 'righteous indignation' towards those who would defile real or imagined standards placed by real or imagined judges. Reminds me of fundamentalist everywhere. How easy it is to generalize real people by the general "they". Who knows? Someday, "they" may be "you". The amount of energy devoted to trite answers and holier-than-thou elitism far outweighs any perceived good. (Hey, I had some fun looking it up again, myself.) Besides, it violates one of the great training principles, "There are no dumb questions!" Keep those card and letters coming! Very best, G. VP OGC previous stuff=== You are indeed correct. Posting questions here is a way of finding information on the internet. It's the lazy persons way! Why take an hour or two to look something up on your own when you can post a question here in one minute and have someone else provide the answer? The ability to research a problem and identify possible solultions on ones own is a critical skill for networkers. Do you think a CCIE just posts a question here every time they come across something they are not familiar with? I don't think so! If you want to encourage people to post questions here without doing research, that's up to you but you're not doing them a favor. All you're teaching them is when confronted with a problem... ASK SOMEONE ELSE! = > I can be mean sometimes can't I ;-)... I just get tired of people claiming > to be "networkers" and they don't even know how to use the ultimate resource > of networkers... the internet... they just post questions here without doing > ANY research on their own... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26379&t=25805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCxx Study Lab 8 Routers + 2 Switches x 24 Hours = $25.00 [7:26381]
For more information visit http://www.cheaplab.com _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26381&t=26381 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT - List of dirty words [7:26380]
This is totally off-topic, and I realize it's lazy to ask help so quickly, but this seems like an interesting quest. I need to populate my e-mail filters for dirty words, racial epitaphs and other offensive nonsense. Before I corrupt my pure and uncommonly sin-free soul by spending hours typing every foul thing I can think of, does anybody know of a webpage that I can cut and paste something, or perhaps e-mail me off-line what you've accumulated in the past? Again, let me apologize for the OT, but hey, the sooner I get this lame task done, the sooner I can power up my pod and contribute some relevant material to the group. Thank you in advance for your assistance, and I'm waiting in trepidation to see what comes my way in response to this inquiry... :-) -=- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26380&t=26380 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE#8387 [7:26309]
Congratulations Nigel! -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26382&t=26309 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF transit areas across non-OSPF interfaces [7:26377]
Hmm interesting. If you *didn't* connect your area 1 to the other ospf area 0, you could redistribute ospf into eigrp on R1 and then from eigrp to ospf on R2. Is that an option? The ospf process on R1 wouldn't even need to be aware of area 0 if it's the only area existing on the left hand side of your diagram. Another option occurs to me but I've never attempted it, I don't have any idea if it would work, and who knows the chaos that might ensue if you try it. Could you set up an ip-over-ip tunnel over the eigrp link and place that tunnel in area 0? Attempt that at your own risk. I'm not sure what effect it will have on routing. It may quickly turn into a quagmire depending on which routes you're learning from eigrp. I hope someone else posts a simpler, more elegant solution. To be honest, I'm not exactly certain what you're trying to accomplish. Can you explain more about the goal of this scenario? Do you know the skill they're trying to test with this problem? Good luck! John >>> "Danny Cox" 11/15/01 9:47:24 AM >>> I'm really quite confused by this. I am working through a lab currently which uses OSPF, EIGRP and BGP. I haven't reached the BGP bit yet which is okay, but there is an OSPF/EIGRP bit I don't get. ++ +---+ +---+ | | | | +-+ | +---+ R1| s0 |s1 |---| s0| | s1 | R2 +-+ | +---+ | | | | OSPF | EIGRP| OSPF | | OSPF AREA 1 | | AREA 0| | AREA 2 ++ +---+ +---+ I realise that if R1-S1s network were placed into Area 0 then everything would flood through regardless of EIGRP. If I put R1-S1 into another OSPF Area - 3 say - then I could set up a virtual link. As this lab is presented to me, neither of those are options. In effect I want to use EIGRP as a transit area to allow the OSPF Area1 to connect to the OSPF Area0. How do I do this? I have searched quite hard around the web and come up with nothing other than virtual-links through an OSPF area which is a technology I understand - in concept at least. Anyone point me to anything to explain this? cheers Danny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26383&t=26377 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "QuizWare" vs. "Boson" [7:26361]
I've personally used both. Quizware is cheaper, you get 500 questions for $49.99 or something like that. Both use the Boson engine. But I feel that the Boson exams offer better quality. The questions make you think. I feel that quizware follow more of the blueprint than boson. Boson helps reinforce what you learn. If I have to choose, it's boson all the way. -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26384&t=26361 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF transit areas across non-OSPF interfaces [7:26377]
Thanks for the reply John. I was a bit bemused by it too. I suspect I've either missed the point completely or it's about redistribution, but I had thought about tunnelling too. I've reread through the lab itself and realise that I've misread it - the whole OSPF AS *is* connected together and the point is to redistribute into EIGRP to other routers in the EIGRP AS. My mistake. I would like to understand though whether it is possible, regardless of this lab to connect OSPF Areas to Area0 via other than another OSPF Area and a virtual link! cheers and thanks for the thoughts - any ideas on the non-ospf transit area would be interesting, or to be slapped down and told I misunderstand completely would be useful likewise! Danny >Hmm interesting. > >If you *didn't* connect your area 1 to the other ospf area 0, you could >redistribute ospf into eigrp on R1 and then from eigrp to ospf on R2. >Is that an option? > >The ospf process on R1 wouldn't even need to be aware of area 0 if it's >the only area existing on the left hand side of your diagram. > >Another option occurs to me but I've never attempted it, I don't have >any idea if it would work, and who knows the chaos that might ensue if >you try it. Could you set up an ip-over-ip tunnel over the eigrp link >and place that tunnel in area 0? > >Attempt that at your own risk. I'm not sure what effect it will have >on routing. It may quickly turn into a quagmire depending on which >routes you're learning from eigrp. > >I hope someone else posts a simpler, more elegant solution. To be >honest, I'm not exactly certain what you're trying to accomplish. Can >you explain more about the goal of this scenario? Do you know the skill >they're trying to test with this problem? > >Good luck! > >John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26387&t=26377 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE#8387 [7:26309]
Nigel, Congradulations on your achievement. It is always nice to read about this kind of accomplishment. It reminds the rest of us who aspire to meet and conquer this Herculean challenge that it can be done. With the holidays just around the corner, I hope you find time to relax and to relish in the magnitude of your success. Regards, Justin Cluer From: "Nigel Taylor" Reply-To: "Nigel Taylor" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE#8387 [7:26309] Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:55:28 -0500 Well as it would turn out it's my turn to write that awesome email... I just got back from RTP today where after checking my email, I was awarded CCIE#8387. What a journey/process this has been and I must say that I'm relieved that it's now over. After countless hours of study and practicing on the "rack" the reward was most definitely worth the sacrifice. I didn't sleep a any last night as I awaited the results of my lab score which I was unable to check until 12 noon today. So on that note I'm off to catch up on the sleep that escaped me last night. More to follow once I get rested up.. Nigel Taylor CCIE#8387 and all that other stuff.. :-> _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26389&t=26309 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Salary Expectations/CCNP's!!!!!!!!! [7:25805]
I have been following this without saying anything, but I cant resist any longer. Are you saying that people should look up all their own answers? If that is the case, why have this board? Just so mean spirited people like those who answered this guy with useless answers can pounce on the newbie who asks what you consider a question which is not worthy? I think one of the great things about a group like this is I don't need to look up everything myself, I can rely on the knowledge and experience of others, and hopefully bring my experiences to some use here for others. Who should decide what others can ask? If the person comes here for an answer to a question rather that spending hours looking it up themselves, I think it shows that they know where to go for answers. I don't think traveling the hard road is the important part, I think getting the answers is. If you don't have something constructive to say don't reply to the post! "If you can't say somethin' nice, Don't say nothin' at all." - Bambi Hope I haven't offended anyone. Sal = "Ask yourself if what you are doing today is getting you closer to where you want to be tomorrow." - Unknown __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26390&t=25805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Introduction [7:26391]
Hello fellow networkers, I just joined the study group, and I wanted to introduce myself. I hope to provide some help in our quest to Cisco certifications and likewise. I look forward to the journey. Scott Scott Nawalaniec CCNP, CCDP, CCNA, CCDA, CNA, MCP, Network+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26391&t=26391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT - List of dirty words [7:26380]
> This is totally off-topic, and I realize it's lazy to ask help so quickly, > but this seems like an interesting quest. It would be very interesting if posted to the proper group. This, sadly, is not such a group. > Before I corrupt my pure and uncommonly sin-free soul by spending hours > typing every foul thing I can think of, does anybody know of a webpage that > I can cut and paste something, or perhaps e-mail me off-line what you've > accumulated in the past? http://www.google.com has lots of links. Did you try there? Also, keep in mind that "diryt words" are not simply what we would consider to be foul language. Dirty words define words that your company would not want passing through your content scanner, and are even in this context, not set in stone. Example, I may not want mail with the word "resume" in the subject leaving my network, but have no objections to such mail coming in. I might object to web content with the words "sex" involved incoming and outgoing, and so on. To limit your request to vulgarity limits the scope of your effectiveness greatly. > Again, let me apologize for the OT, but hey, the sooner I get this lame task > done, the sooner I can power up my pod and contribute some relevant material > to the group. Your future plans to contribute topcial matter are not sufficient to excuse such an imposition on my napping. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26392&t=26380 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Salary Expectations/CCNP's!!!!!!!!! [7:25805]
I couldn't said it better. Great job, Sal Scott -Original Message- From: Sal DiStefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Salary Expectations/CCNP's! [7:25805] I have been following this without saying anything, but I cant resist any longer. Are you saying that people should look up all their own answers? If that is the case, why have this board? Just so mean spirited people like those who answered this guy with useless answers can pounce on the newbie who asks what you consider a question which is not worthy? I think one of the great things about a group like this is I don't need to look up everything myself, I can rely on the knowledge and experience of others, and hopefully bring my experiences to some use here for others. Who should decide what others can ask? If the person comes here for an answer to a question rather that spending hours looking it up themselves, I think it shows that they know where to go for answers. I don't think traveling the hard road is the important part, I think getting the answers is. If you don't have something constructive to say don't reply to the post! "If you can't say somethin' nice, Don't say nothin' at all." - Bambi Hope I haven't offended anyone. Sal = "Ask yourself if what you are doing today is getting you closer to where you want to be tomorrow." - Unknown __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26393&t=25805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - List of dirty words [7:26380]
Speaking as the chief "smut-buster" at my site for the fed's typical effort with the "Children's Internet Protection Act", you have a hard road coming. This is a high-profile and thankless duty. My solution is to go to a commercial provider, make it very clear that the filtering choice is their responsibility, and keep my head down. Otherwise, you need a 'committee' to share the wealth of abuse you're about to take. As for actual words, the aforementioned commercial provider gave up on the word game; too many variables, at least in the html filter land. And, as a 20 year commercial fisher with a few additional commercial diving years thrown in for good measure, I can assure you that "sin-free souls" have little chance covering truly depraved language. Given that vast expertise, and the obvious relevance to CCIE-type expertise, I'd be happy to provide you that information for standard CCIE rates---not! Your best bet might be George Carlin's list of "Seven words you can't say on television." Very best, G. VP OGC -Original Message- From: Dennis Laganiere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT - List of dirty words [7:26380] This is totally off-topic, and I realize it's lazy to ask help so quickly, but this seems like an interesting quest. I need to populate my e-mail filters for dirty words, racial epitaphs and other offensive nonsense. Before I corrupt my pure and uncommonly sin-free soul by spending hours typing every foul thing I can think of, does anybody know of a webpage that I can cut and paste something, or perhaps e-mail me off-line what you've accumulated in the past? Again, let me apologize for the OT, but hey, the sooner I get this lame task done, the sooner I can power up my pod and contribute some relevant material to the group. Thank you in advance for your assistance, and I'm waiting in trepidation to see what comes my way in response to this inquiry... :-) -=- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26394&t=26380 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Salary Expectations/CCNP's!!!!!!!!! [7:25805]
Thank you for your statement Sal. Apparently locating www.fatkid.com and [EMAIL PROTECTED] is easily accomplished WITHOUT any skills in WWW searching! I believe that most people who have found this list server have already proven that they can search out useful information tools regarding networking and more specifically, cisco related issues. Butwhat do I know? John Squeo Technical Specialist Papa John's Corporation (502) 261-4035 "Sal DiStefano" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Salary Expectations/CCNP's! [7:25805] Sent by: nobody@groupst udy.com 11/15/01 01:09 PM Please respond to "Sal DiStefano" I have been following this without saying anything, but I cant resist any longer. Are you saying that people should look up all their own answers? If that is the case, why have this board? Just so mean spirited people like those who answered this guy with useless answers can pounce on the newbie who asks what you consider a question which is not worthy? I think one of the great things about a group like this is I don't need to look up everything myself, I can rely on the knowledge and experience of others, and hopefully bring my experiences to some use here for others. Who should decide what others can ask? If the person comes here for an answer to a question rather that spending hours looking it up themselves, I think it shows that they know where to go for answers. I don't think traveling the hard road is the important part, I think getting the answers is. If you don't have something constructive to say don't reply to the post! "If you can't say somethin' nice, Don't say nothin' at all." - Bambi Hope I haven't offended anyone. Sal = "Ask yourself if what you are doing today is getting you closer to where you want to be tomorrow." - Unknown __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26395&t=25805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Urgent! Please help! [7:26396]
My stuff is broken, I think I need some things to fix it. Any ideas on what's wrong? any help appreciated! -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26396&t=26396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - List of dirty words [7:26380]
You knew it had to happen...OK if the response was an attempt to be
sarcastic, please ignore the following:
First, if you didn't want to deal with the off topic post, the subject of
Dennis' post was:
OT - List of dirty words ("OT" stands for Off Topic)
Second, Dennis seems to be trying to come up with a list of objectionable
words with which to filter his own email client, not a corporate email
platform. He does not wish to recreate the wheel and type every known
obscenity into his profanity filter by hand.
Third, Did *you* check google.com? I did. What I didn't find was
anyone posting a list of a hundred or more obscene words in a file for
anyone to download. (Maybe fifty or so though... ;-) One reason for
that might be that if *I* can download them that easily, maybe 8 year
old Johnny can too! ;-)
(The rest of this is for Dennis..)
Hey Dennis, George Carlin provided the FCC with a list once...they
really do have a "official" list. I will post five words, sanitized
of course...
#$%^
&^*(
!@$#
#@$%
$%^&
OK, enough of the fun. I am going back to work now
P.S. - Thanks for your R&S CramSession. I used it some to help pass
the exam.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: Drew - Home [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - List of dirty words [7:26380]
> This is totally off-topic, and I realize it's lazy to ask help so quickly,
> but this seems like an interesting quest.
It would be very interesting if posted to the proper group. This, sadly,
is not such a group.
> Before I corrupt my pure and uncommonly sin-free soul by spending hours
> typing every foul thing I can think of, does anybody know of a webpage
that
> I can cut and paste something, or perhaps e-mail me off-line what you've
> accumulated in the past?
http://www.google.com has lots of links. Did you try there? Also,
keep in mind that "diryt words" are not simply what we would consider
to be foul language. Dirty words define words that your company
would not want passing through your content scanner, and are even
in this context, not set in stone. Example, I may not want mail with
the word "resume" in the subject leaving my network, but have no
objections to such mail coming in. I might object to web content with
the words "sex" involved incoming and outgoing, and so on.
To limit your request to vulgarity limits the scope of your effectiveness
greatly.
> Again, let me apologize for the OT, but hey, the sooner I get this lame
task
> done, the sooner I can power up my pod and contribute some relevant
material
> to the group.
Your future plans to contribute topcial matter are not sufficient to excuse
such an imposition on my napping.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26397&t=26380
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398]
I am wanting to configure a mac-address filter on my switch but need some help. Has anyone done this? Thanks. Ken Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26398&t=26398 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX line up protocol down [7:26349]
Kent,
I hope I get to contribute.
Check the cable. I have seen in the past problems were the link lights on
the ethernet interface would be on but one of the pins 1,2,3,6 was cut, but
there was no communication. Also, set both the switch and router to 100/FD
if the switch can support it. Check to see if ethernet 0 has the right
encapsulation, ARPA.
"line protocol is {up | down | administratively down}
Indicates whether the software processes that handle the line protocol
believe the interface is usable (that is, whether keepalives are successful)
or if it has been taken down by an administrator"
If I left anything out to check, or please correct me if I am wrong.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Jay Creasy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PIX line up protocol down [7:26349]
Are you using a strait-thru or cross-over cable ?
-
Jay C Creasy
Cisco Certified Network Professional + PIX
Microsoft Certified Professional
Inet Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM ID HaltItAll
Work # 713-548-3346
Home # 713-263-1939
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Kent Hawkins
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX line up protocol down [7:26349]
Hi Guys
I have a pix 520 that has 3 interfaces configured. Ethernet 1 and 2 are
normal and have line up, protocol up. Ethernet 0 is down with line up ,
protocol down. There is a link light on both the Ethernet 0 interface
and switch port. This is not a duplex issue since I have already set the
Ethernet 0 interface to auto negotiate and back to 100full.
Has anybody got any ideas??
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26399&t=26349
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Urgent! Please help! [7:26396]
Yes. First of all, you need to configure that one thing correctly. You can't use that keyword there, it will break that other thing. Second, you need to replace that other thing with a new model. That old model doesn't support what you're trying to do with it. Third, scrap your config completely and practice multihoming with BGP, or perhaps attempt back-to-back token ring in your home lab. HTH, John >>> "Patrick Ramsey" 11/15/01 11:50:48 AM >>> My stuff is broken, I think I need some things to fix it. Any ideas on what's wrong? any help appreciated! -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26400&t=26396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Urgent! Please help! [7:26396]
When in doubt, REBOOT! -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26401&t=26396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Urgent! Please help! [7:26396]
It just seemed as if the list went WAY serious for a few minutes there... Just thought I would throw a loop in the mix >>> "John Neiberger" 11/15/01 02:20PM >>> Yes. First of all, you need to configure that one thing correctly. You can't use that keyword there, it will break that other thing. Second, you need to replace that other thing with a new model. That old model doesn't support what you're trying to do with it. Third, scrap your config completely and practice multihoming with BGP, or perhaps attempt back-to-back token ring in your home lab. HTH, John >>> "Patrick Ramsey" 11/15/01 11:50:48 AM >>> My stuff is broken, I think I need some things to fix it. Any ideas on what's wrong? any help appreciated! -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26403&t=26396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent! Please help! [7:26396]
Troll -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Urgent! Please help! [7:26396] My stuff is broken, I think I need some things to fix it. Any ideas on what's wrong? any help appreciated! -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26402&t=26396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i can view syn acks & acks, but not the syn [7:26404]
to the host? is there something wrong w/my acl? telnet client -> 151.144.210.29 telnet host -> 192.168.1.254 (this is the debugging router) access-list 100 permit tcp host 151.144.210.29 host 192.168.1.254 access-list 100 permit tcp host 192.168.1.254 host 151.144.210.29 ! r6_t/s@timur's#sh access-l 100 Extended IP access list 100 permit tcp host 151.144.210.29 host 192.168.1.254 (76 matches) permit tcp host 192.168.1.254 host 151.144.210.29 (48 matches) ! r6_t/s@timur's#deb ip pack 100 det IP packet debugging is on (detailed) for access list 100 01:29:22: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 44, sending 01:29:22: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072690952, ack=4077085970, win=4128 ACK SYN 01:29:22: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 52, sending 01:29:22: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072690953, ack=4077085970, win=4128 ACK PSH 01:29:22: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 596, sending 01:29:22: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072690965, ack=4077085982, win=4116 ACK 01:29:22: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 148, sending 01:29:22: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691521, ack=4077085982, win=4116 ACK PSH 01:29:22: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 43, sending 01:29:22: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691629, ack=4077085982, win=4116 ACK PSH 01:29:22: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 46, sending 01:29:22: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691632, ack=4077085994, win=4104 ACK PSH 01:29:23: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 40, sending 01:29:23: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691638, ack=4077086005, win=4093 ACK 01:29:23: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 41, sending 01:29:23: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691638, ack=4077086006, win=4092 ACK PSH 01:29:23: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 41, sending 01:29:23: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691639, ack=4077086007, win=4091 ACK PSH 01:29:23: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 41, sending 01:29:23: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691640, ack=4077086008, win=4090 ACK PSH 01:29:23: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 41, sending 01:29:23: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691641, ack=4077086009, win=4089 ACK PSH 01:29:24: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 41, sending 01:29:24: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691642, ack=4077086010, win=4088 ACK PSH 01:29:24: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 52, sending 01:29:24: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691643, ack=4077086012, win=4086 ACK PSH 01:29:26: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 40, sending 01:29:26: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691655, ack=4077086013, win=4085 ACK 01:29:27: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 40, sending 01:29:27: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691655, ack=4077086014, win=4084 ACK 01:29:27: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 40, sending 01:29:27: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691655, ack=4077086015, win=4083 ACK 01:29:27: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 40, sending 01:29:27: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691655, ack=4077086016, win=4082 ACK 01:29:28: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 40, sending 01:29:28: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691655, ack=4077086019, win=4079 ACK 01:29:28: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 40, sending 01:29:28: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691655, ack=4077086021, win=4077 ACK 01:29:28: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 57, sending 01:29:28: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691655, ack=4077086023, win=4075 ACK PSH 01:29:29: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 41, sending 01:29:29: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691672, ack=4077086024, win=4074 ACK PSH 01:29:29: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 41, sending 01:29:29: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691673, ack=4077086025, win=4073 ACK PSH 01:29:29: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 42, sending 01:29:29: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691674, ack=4077086027, win=4071 ACK PSH 01:29:29: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 40, sending 01:29:29: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691676, ack=4077086027, win=4071 ACK PSH FIN 01:29:30: IP: s=192.168.1.254 (local), d=151.144.210.29 (Ethernet0), len 40, sending 01:29:30: TCP src=23, dst=24934, seq=2072691677, ack=4077086028, win=4071 ACK Timur Mirza Principal Network Engineer Network Transition Group Irvine, California Verizon Wireless 949.286.6623 (o) 949.697.7964 (c) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form
Re: Urgent! Please help! [7:26396]
More specifics would be helpful in helping you. Darren At 01:50 PM 11/15/2001 -0500, Patrick Ramsey wrote: >My stuff is broken, I think I need some things to fix it. > >Any ideas on what's wrong? > >any help appreciated! > >-Patrick x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx Lucent Technologies NetworkCare Professional Services http//www.lucent.com/netcare/ Darren S. Crawford - CCNP, CCDA, CCIE Written Northwest Region - Sacramento Office Voicemail (916) 859-5200 x310 Pager (800) 467-1467 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx "You always have time for things you put first" - Tucker Resources Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26405&t=26396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: where exactly is the equipment replicated ? [7:26243]
My point, (other than a feeble attempt at humor related to the Guide), was that we couldn't decode a paragraph that he grabbed from the Internet anymore than we can answer what does 42 mean. I don't expect everyone to research every question. We wouldn't exist as a group if that were possible. But I do expect people to apply some logic. If you want help, you have to give us enough information to help you. In this case he could have told us where he got the paragraph, what was the previous paragraph, what's the title of the page, etc. Maybe he wasn't a native English speaker and thought that we could help because we didn't have to translate. That's a fair excuse. But I didn't want to say that because some people would be sensitive about such assumptions, (plus his English was fine.) Well, back to your regularly scheduled program. I apologize for wasting bandwidth on meta-topics, but this is called proactive bandwidth management. Maybe if we can advise people on how best to use this group, then less bandwidth will be wasted in the future. Or maybe not... Cheers. Don't yell at me! Thanks. ;-) Priscilla At 11:13 PM 11/14/01, Wojtek Zlobicki wrote: >Lets try that again , being a little trigger happy :) > > > And I have a question for you. What does 42 mean? Thanks. > >Hitchhikers Guide memories being a little fuzzy , isn't 42 the answer :P Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26406&t=26243 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: All you veterans... [7:26301]
I contacted Cisco, the Veterans Administration and the California Department of Veterans Affairs about this subject in July. Unfortunately I haven't hear anything in a while. The VA advised me that for veterans to be reimbursed for the Cisco Career Certification program, the program would have to be "accredited" by the state Department of Veterans Affairs in the state where Cisco's headquarters resides. I contacted the California Department of Veterans affairs and found them to be very cooperative. They wished to be put in contact with the correct people at Cisco, so I gave them all of the contact info I could from my perspective. After a couple of weeks, I received the following email from Cisco ([EMAIL PROTECTED])... >Dear Timothy, > >Thank you for your feedback. > >Due to requests from our dedicated customers, such as yourself, Cisco has >applied to have the Cisco Career Certification exams approved under the VA >Reimbursement Program. Once the details are finalized we will post the >information to our website. > >We thank you for your continued support of the Cisco Career Certifications >program. > >Cisco Career Certifications I have no idea what the status of Cisco's application is. I hope them get it approved soon, I have the 4 CCNP test to go! Maybe as a group we could use our collective resources to expedite this application? Timothy Estes CCNA, CCDA Sr. Network Systems Analyst Intermedia Communications (WorldCom) Tampa FL [EMAIL PROTECTED] (formerly RM3 USN) -Original Message- From: Sal DiStefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: All you veterans... [7:26301] Funny the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America is on the list but not Cisco. I called and they said to send it in and they may pay for it anyway. Sal - Original Message - From: "Jeff D" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:32 PM Subject: All you veterans... [7:26301] > Check it out for reimbursement: > > https://www.gibill.va.gov/Education/LCVets.htm Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26360&t=26301 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920]
I wasn't trying to be mean at all. I'm sure they have a decent product. But my thought process is that ccbootcamp has a proven success record with teaching CCIE level material and I would prefer to stick with that type of history. Their website is www.ccbootcamp.com -Original Message- From: Thompson, Kenny (K.) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:34 AM To: 'Jeremy Wright'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] ouch! That was hard, but I think I will go with your suggestion Jeremy. In the mean time do you know the site for the ccboot camp so I can get the lab material. Rgds kenny -Original Message- From: Jeremy Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] You've been selling your labs since July and no one has passed using them? I'd say they are a complete waste of money if that's the case. I've met the guys from ccbootcamp and I guarantee they run a first class operation. I think the smartest move is to use what has a proven track record in the CCIE process. > From: ""Michael Cinquanti"" > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 6:12 PM > Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] > > > > I too am completely biased (since I'm the > Publisher of CertificationZone > > and we sell the IPexpert Lab Workbook), but the > fact that Mr. Ellis knows > > 150 CCIEs who have used his service does not > support the idea that > > one Lab reference is the *best choice*. Since the > ZONE has only been > > selling the IPexpert Lab Workbook since July, Brad > knows that we do not > yet > > have 150 customers who have used our book and > passed the Lab Exam. But > > based on the way our book is flying off the shelf > and based on the fact > > that qualified reviewers have told us that our > reference is an excellent > > study > > tool, I suspect that it won't be too long before > we do have that many > > CCIEs and more. > > > > As for constant updating, in the past three > months, the IPexpert Workbook > > has been updated two times and already includes a > sample lab in the new > > one-day format. Yet another Update is being > prepared now and will be > > distributed, free-of-charge, to anyone who owns a > previous version. > > > > We have also had people who've passed the lab and > people who've failed the > > lab review our book from cover-to-cover. The > results are unanimous. They > > think the IPexpert Book is a great preparation > resource for the Lab Exam > > and worth every penny it costs. We've published > one such review (from a > guy > > who's currently preparing for his second Lab Exam > attempt) at the ZONE > > website. We should have a second review (from a > guy who's already earned > > his CCIE) posted at the site sometime this month. > > > > But I can't answer Pieter-Jan's original question > -- and neither can Brad > > Ellis. Postings on Newsgroups and Mailing Lists > can be helpful, but don't > > depend completely on what you read there. I urge > all CCIE lab candidates > > looking for appropriate references to examine all > the alternatives > > carefully. Visit the websites, use e-mail and > those toll free phone > > numbers, examine the qualifications of the > authors, ask for references, > and > > contact those references directly. If you find two > you like and can afford > > to do so, buy them both. Good luck with the Lab > Exam. > > > > >I am completely biased (since I am one of the > owner's of NLI), but I do > know > > >of over 150 CCIE's that have used the ccbootcamp > labs to get their > CCIE...I > > >havent heard of one CCIE yet that has used the > other labs to get their #. > > >:) > > > > > >Also, the bootcamp labs are constantly being > updated and added on to. In > > >fact, we are in the process of modifying all of > our old labs by removing > the > > >obsolete technology and changing them to a 1-day > format (which means we > give > > >you pre-config files with IP addresses, not a > real big deal there). > > > > > >thanks, > > >-Brad Ellis > > >CCIE#5796 > > >Network Learning Inc > > >www.ccbootcamp.com > > > > > >""Pieter-Jan Bakhuyzen"" wrote in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I'm looking to buy a CCIE Lab Workbook to > prepare for my CCIE Lab in > June > > >> 2002. > > >> I've found the following two on the net: > > >> > > >> - Certificationzone - IPexpert Lab Preparation > Workbook 2.0 > > >> - CCBootcamp - CCIE LAB Package Subscription > > >> > > >> Has anybody used these and which one is > considered the best choice? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Pieter-Jan Bakhuyzen > > >> CCNP, CCDP, MCSE > > Mike Cinquanti > > President > > Genium Publishing Corporation > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ___
Re: File needed - CPA3640 upgrade file [7:26253]
Okay, Im an idiot. I just found out you dont need a file to upgrade this router to a normal 3640...CCIE's are allowed one dumb question a year, arent they??? :) thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] ""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone have the CPA3640 upgrade file? I've got the other CPA upgrade > files, but Im missing that one. Email me offlist if you do. > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26388&t=26253 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: what would u do when u bored [7:3784]
Bored?? H... Assumption #1: You are working as some type of network engineer & have access to the network Assumption #2: You have a sniffer [I love NAI Sniffer Pro--Distributed is even better...] Sniff all the different segments on you network. Create filters to filter out "types" of traffic. An example is create a filter looking for _only_ DNS failures. I just recently found a piece of "spyware" that AT&T's ISP dialer software that was sending out dns querries for ibmxxx.inverse.net...where xxx was 001 through 009. They all fail...and the dialer software just kept rolling thru the numbers indefinately while the user was dialed up [and connected to our VPN] [the solution was to upgrade the software]... Look of _ICMP_ traffic... see what you see... Look at whatever routing protocol you use [ospf is the most _fun_]...what can you deduce from the traces... and then there is _SNMP_ traffic...always fun to catch...suprising how much info is sent in plaintext... and then there is just catching those boxen that have shitty [excuse my canadian-french] drivers...they don't window, or cause excessive retrans...etc... I make it 75% of my job to sniff...PRO-ACTIVE is key to a happy network... now if only all the users would get off my network, it would be fine ;-) TroyC -Original Message- From: Peter zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: what would u do when u bored [3:3784] Bored Hi guys, I will like to get some opinion from the group, what would you guys do when you feel bored at work? any input will be highly appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26386&t=3784 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920]
ouch! That was hard, but I think I will go with your suggestion Jeremy. In the mean time do you know the site for the ccboot camp so I can get the lab material. Rgds kenny -Original Message- From: Jeremy Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] You've been selling your labs since July and no one has passed using them? I'd say they are a complete waste of money if that's the case. I've met the guys from ccbootcamp and I guarantee they run a first class operation. I think the smartest move is to use what has a proven track record in the CCIE process. > From: ""Michael Cinquanti"" > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 6:12 PM > Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] > > > > I too am completely biased (since I'm the > Publisher of CertificationZone > > and we sell the IPexpert Lab Workbook), but the > fact that Mr. Ellis knows > > 150 CCIEs who have used his service does not > support the idea that > > one Lab reference is the *best choice*. Since the > ZONE has only been > > selling the IPexpert Lab Workbook since July, Brad > knows that we do not > yet > > have 150 customers who have used our book and > passed the Lab Exam. But > > based on the way our book is flying off the shelf > and based on the fact > > that qualified reviewers have told us that our > reference is an excellent > > study > > tool, I suspect that it won't be too long before > we do have that many > > CCIEs and more. > > > > As for constant updating, in the past three > months, the IPexpert Workbook > > has been updated two times and already includes a > sample lab in the new > > one-day format. Yet another Update is being > prepared now and will be > > distributed, free-of-charge, to anyone who owns a > previous version. > > > > We have also had people who've passed the lab and > people who've failed the > > lab review our book from cover-to-cover. The > results are unanimous. They > > think the IPexpert Book is a great preparation > resource for the Lab Exam > > and worth every penny it costs. We've published > one such review (from a > guy > > who's currently preparing for his second Lab Exam > attempt) at the ZONE > > website. We should have a second review (from a > guy who's already earned > > his CCIE) posted at the site sometime this month. > > > > But I can't answer Pieter-Jan's original question > -- and neither can Brad > > Ellis. Postings on Newsgroups and Mailing Lists > can be helpful, but don't > > depend completely on what you read there. I urge > all CCIE lab candidates > > looking for appropriate references to examine all > the alternatives > > carefully. Visit the websites, use e-mail and > those toll free phone > > numbers, examine the qualifications of the > authors, ask for references, > and > > contact those references directly. If you find two > you like and can afford > > to do so, buy them both. Good luck with the Lab > Exam. > > > > >I am completely biased (since I am one of the > owner's of NLI), but I do > know > > >of over 150 CCIE's that have used the ccbootcamp > labs to get their > CCIE...I > > >havent heard of one CCIE yet that has used the > other labs to get their #. > > >:) > > > > > >Also, the bootcamp labs are constantly being > updated and added on to. In > > >fact, we are in the process of modifying all of > our old labs by removing > the > > >obsolete technology and changing them to a 1-day > format (which means we > give > > >you pre-config files with IP addresses, not a > real big deal there). > > > > > >thanks, > > >-Brad Ellis > > >CCIE#5796 > > >Network Learning Inc > > >www.ccbootcamp.com > > > > > >""Pieter-Jan Bakhuyzen"" wrote in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I'm looking to buy a CCIE Lab Workbook to > prepare for my CCIE Lab in > June > > >> 2002. > > >> I've found the following two on the net: > > >> > > >> - Certificationzone - IPexpert Lab Preparation > Workbook 2.0 > > >> - CCBootcamp - CCIE LAB Package Subscription > > >> > > >> Has anybody used these and which one is > considered the best choice? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Pieter-Jan Bakhuyzen > > >> CCNP, CCDP, MCSE > > Mike Cinquanti > > President > > Genium Publishing Corporation > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26375&t=24920 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Urgent! Please help! [7:26396]
I've got it!!! The problem is... it's not working. ;-) Care to add more details? Ken >>> "Patrick Ramsey" 11/15/01 12:50PM >>> My stuff is broken, I think I need some things to fix it. Any ideas on what's wrong? any help appreciated! -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26407&t=26396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "QuizWare" vs. "Boson" [7:26361]
To all, I'm an author for QuizWare for Cisco tests and I can say that ALL my tests have COMPLETELY different questions than Boson. The test engine used by QuizWare is the same engine that Boson uses. Actually, QuizWare is a channel partner of Boson. QuizWare caters, for the most part, to authors that want to develop customized tests. Boson restricts their test prices to $39.95 and the number of questions per test to about 200. QuizWare has no such restriction, so an author could charge $1,000 per test and put 10,000 questions in it. The tests that I have written for QuizWare have at least 500 questions each and only cost $49.95. Plus, I have a special of buy 3, get the 4th free. Hope this helps! ""Dimitris Vassilopoulos"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Same format, same questions... > > Dvass -- __ Richard Deal email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://pages.prodigy.net/richard.deal * Just finished a CCNA ebook available at Boson (www.boson.com): + "CCNA Secrets Revealed!" * CCNP test author for QuizWare (www.quizware.com) + CCNA #1 and #2 -- 550 questions each! + CCNP Routing #1 -- 500 questions + CCNP Switching #1 -- 500 questions + CCNP Remote Access #1 -- 500 questions + CCNP Support #1 -- 500 questions * Author of the following Coriolis books: + "CCNP Switching Exam Cram" + "CCNP Remote Access Exam Prep" + "CCNP Cisco Lan Switch Configuration Exam Cram" __ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26408&t=26361 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398]
>I am wanting to configure a mac-address filter on my switch but need some >help. Has anyone done this? > >Thanks. > >Ken Well, yes. But to coin a phrase, and to put it into a better context, what problem are you trying to solve? I find people learn better when they have a goal in mind, then look at configuration alternatives and how they relate to the problem. Howard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26409&t=26398 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE#8387 [7:26309]
Congratulations Nigel...U made it... U ought to tell us about your experiences with this cert. for the benifit of all CCIE aspirants... But only after ur sleep...;) Regards, Ramu > > -Original Message- > From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 6:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CCIE#8387 [7:26309] > > > Well as it would turn out it's my turn to write that > awesome email... I > just > got back from RTP today where after checking my > email, I was awarded > CCIE#8387. What a journey/process this has been and > I must say that I'm > relieved that it's now over. After countless hours > of study and practicing > on > the "rack" the reward was most definitely worth the > sacrifice. > > I didn't sleep a any last night as I awaited the > results of my lab score > which > I was unable to check until 12 noon today. So on > that note I'm off to catch > up > on the sleep that escaped me last night. > > More to follow once I get rested up.. > > Nigel Taylor > CCIE#8387 and all that other stuff.. :-> [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26410&t=26309 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: where exactly is the equipment replicated ? [7:26243]
memory is hazy. in the original radio broadcast, there is much to do made about "the answer". those seeking learn that the answer to "life, the universe, and everything" is 42 and they realize it makes no sense. they are told that the answer makes perfect sense if they ask the right question. they commission the mice to run another computer study to derive the question. the program is terminated prematurely when the Volgons (?) destroy Earth 5 minutes too soon, which was the impetus that began Ford Prefect's adventures, and his discoveries of the true purpose of the earth and all it contains. My recollection is that we never do learn the question, and therefore are left with an answer that is totally meaningless, even if it is "the answer". I've always enjoyed the delicious irony of hearing people throw out "42" as the answer, wondering if said speaker understands that without knowing the proper question, the "answer" indeed is meaningless. in my student days there was an apocryphal story making the rounds about the philosophy professor whose final consisted of one question: "why?" the only A was given to the student who answered "because!" if only router configurations were so open ended Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: where exactly is the equipment replicated ? [7:26243] 42 is the answer to the life, universe and everything (Hitchhikers Guide BBC TV, Radio and book) but what is the question ;-) Rah Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26411&t=26243 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: about BGP [7:26353]
Did you configure ebgp-multihop? -Original Message- From: ]hsan Turkmen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: about BGP [7:26353] Hi. I am trying to configure two routers as BGP peers . Routers (both) are on the same LAN but in diffrent subnetworks. I mean, routers can ping eachother , since there is another router between them. But , they can not establish BGP connection as two neighbours. Does that mean they have to be dirctly connected to eachother.? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26412&t=26353 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]
VoIP Guy wrote: > > If traffic shaping, do both sides match?Are you doing any > FRF.12 > fragmentation? Are you sure the traffic shaping paramaters > are OK? I have > a feeling this is it. Make sure both sides match. > > The TS statements both match on both ends. We have the same type of PVC with same CIR and other parameters going to other sites and using the same TS configuration. And no frame fragmentations. I do have it schduled to swap this router out within 2 weeks. I am hoping it is either the router or the local cabling to the router. We could not get the regular 1720 that we wanted to deploy until Dec so we have a temp 2501 that the local field company used and I do not know how steady this router is. thanks Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26413&t=26263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Discussion of BGP related to a DR solution [7:26147]
Thanks for the reply- I'm following you. We need traffic to be down no longer than an hour. So should i work with the ISPs to clarify the details and/or is there any particular references that depict this type of scenario? What about other alternatives for ensuring that the traffic would failover? Any other resources you could point me to? appreciate your time.byron - Original Message - From: "Chris White" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:57 PM Subject: Re: Discussion of BGP related to a DR solution [7:26147] > Yes and no... > > If you plan to announce addresses from DC1 (provider 1) through > DC2 (provider 2) in the case of a failure/loss of DC1 you could > run into reachability issues. Some providers filter on allocation > boundries so the /24 announcements will probably not be globally > reachable. How severly this impacts you will depend on the function > of the datacenter > > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Byron wrote: > > > Interested in feedback on using BGP as a Disaster Recovery and/or Load > > Balancing solution: > > > > BACKGROUND > > Currently, we have one production datacenter (COLO) (DC1) with 2 100MB > feeds > > to redundant 7200s, 2 ip class C blocks (say 1.1.1.x and 2.2.2.x) one > behind > > each 7200. this is a Cisco failover setup with all Cisco gear - mirrored > > 6509s., local directors, PIXs, etc). primary and secondary DNS are behind > > 7200 and a firewall on a DMZ. Third dns server is at separate corp site > > (CORP) on DMZ which is connected via backend T1 on another VLAN... way > > behind the 7200s. > > > > Anyway, to the fun part: > > > > OBJECTIVE: > > Goal is to bring up a disaster recovery data-center (DC2) (another > > location/provider) where by we could route traffic to this new site should > > production site go down (within an hour). It doesn't have to be utilized > > normally for complete loadbalancing, as it won't have all the hardware, > > redundancy, etc. that DC1 has. This site would have its own class C block > > (say 3.3.3.x) allocated from this new hosting center/ISP with backend T1 to > > corp and perhaps a backend T1 to product DC1 for incremental DB > > replication/administration, etc. > > > > Still trying to finish my CCNP, I'm a relative newbie with BGP, however > > based on my understanding we were thinking that BGP would help solve this > > problem by creating one AS comprised of the IP blocks at both locations > (1&2 > > from DC1 and 3 from DC2). We could inject weighted static routes into each > > ISPs AS respectively and if the primary site failed traffic on the internet > > destined for both 1.1.1.x and 2.2.2.x would be routed over to DC2. I > realize > > that there are many more details regarding the BGP setup but I'm trying to > > narrow down the functional - high level architecture to communicate > > internally for project approval. Is that a correct understanding? That is, > > can BGP function this way? I'm wondering if anyone else out there is doing > > this and can speak to whether (or not) BGP can help us out. > > > > Appreciate anyone's ideas or feedback- > > Byron > > > > > > > > > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26416&t=26147 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
42 WAS: RE: where exactly is the equipment replicated ? [7:26418]
My memory is also hazy, but I seem to recall that the question was given in one of the later books, and is "what is six times nine". I have so many books I want to reread... Back to your regularly scheduled networking discussions... maybe :-) JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 16/11/2001 08:55 am - "Chuck Larrieu" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: where exactly is the equipment Sent by: replicated ? [7:26243] nobody@groups tudy.com 16/11/2001 07:30 am Please respond to "Chuck Larrieu" memory is hazy. in the original radio broadcast, there is much to do made about "the answer". those seeking learn that the answer to "life, the universe, and everything" is 42 and they realize it makes no sense. they are told that the answer makes perfect sense if they ask the right question. they commission the mice to run another computer study to derive the question. the program is terminated prematurely when the Volgons (?) destroy Earth 5 minutes too soon, which was the impetus that began Ford Prefect's adventures, and his discoveries of the true purpose of the earth and all it contains. My recollection is that we never do learn the question, and therefore are left with an answer that is totally meaningless, even if it is "the answer". I've always enjoyed the delicious irony of hearing people throw out "42" as the answer, wondering if said speaker understands that without knowing the proper question, the "answer" indeed is meaningless. in my student days there was an apocryphal story making the rounds about the philosophy professor whose final consisted of one question: "why?" the only A was given to the student who answered "because!" if only router configurations were so open ended Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: where exactly is the equipment replicated ? [7:26243] 42 is the answer to the life, universe and everything (Hitchhikers Guide BBC TV, Radio and book) but what is the question ;-) Rah Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26418&t=26418 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 42 WAS: RE: where exactly is the equipment replicated ? [7:26420]
That was when Arthur started pulling scrabble tiles out of his rabbit skin bag. (just re-read the whole thing when my 13 year-old daughter bought me the whole series) It just goes to show that if the question where known that the Universe would be replaced by something even more bizarre. But Many would argue this has already happened. At 02:14 PM 11/15/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >My memory is also hazy, but I seem to recall that the question was given in >one of the later books, and is "what is six times nine". > >I have so many books I want to reread... > >Back to your regularly scheduled networking discussions... maybe :-) > >JMcL >- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 16/11/2001 08:55 am - > > > >"Chuck > Larrieu" To: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: where exactly is the >equipment > Sent by: replicated ? >[7:26243] > >nobody@groups > >tudy.com > > > > > >16/11/2001 > 07:30 >am > >Please > respond >to > >"Chuck > >Larrieu" > > > > > > > > >memory is hazy. in the original radio broadcast, there is much to do made >about "the answer". those seeking learn that the answer to "life, the >universe, and everything" is 42 and they realize it makes no sense. they >are >told that the answer makes perfect sense if they ask the right question. >they commission the mice to run another computer study to derive the >question. the program is terminated prematurely when the Volgons (?) >destroy >Earth 5 minutes too soon, which was the impetus that began Ford Prefect's >adventures, and his discoveries of the true purpose of the earth and all it >contains. > >My recollection is that we never do learn the question, and therefore are >left with an answer that is totally meaningless, even if it is "the >answer". > >I've always enjoyed the delicious irony of hearing people throw out "42" as >the answer, wondering if said speaker understands that without knowing the >proper question, the "answer" indeed is meaningless. > >in my student days there was an apocryphal story making the rounds about >the >philosophy professor whose final consisted of one question: "why?" > >the only A was given to the student who answered "because!" > >if only router configurations were so open ended > >Chuck > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:37 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: where exactly is the equipment replicated ? [7:26243] > > >42 is the answer to the life, universe and everything >(Hitchhikers Guide BBC TV, Radio and book) >but what is the question ;-) > >Rah Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26420&t=26420 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX DMZ Issue [7:26419]
I have a problem with DMZ configuration. Here is the scenerio. DMZ port has UNIX Sendmail Server. IP Address 206.2.34.1 Internal Port has Exchange Server. IP Address 206.6.182.75 Here is what I did to make it work. static (dmz,outside) 155.254.128.7 206.2.34.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 static (inside,dmz) 206.6.182.75 206.6.182.75 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 conduit permit tcp host 155.254.128.7 eq smtp any conduit permit tcp host 206.6.182.75 eq smtp host 206.2.34.1. This is the basic configuration, Customer has an NIS (UNIX) server which is on Internal network at the address 206.6.181.1 and contains all the databases for various applications including the Sendmail server on a dmz port. The sendmail server on dmz port can't come online until it contacts the NIS server on Internal network, and because of the PIX it will not allow polling to work from dmz port to the internal port unless some static mappings and conduit permissions are allowed. How do I reslove this issue with three things. First Sendmail server to contact NIS server at Internal port and then to deliver emails to exchange box. Regards, Abbas Ali, AVVID, CCDP, CCNP, MCSE Network Engineer II Tel: 714.428.3367 Pager: 714.748.4817 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26419&t=26419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]
Has anyone got any information/links on how to configure a window2000 cert server to enroll a pix?? The TAC is informative enough about the pix side of things and offers a decent link to the MS site, but there is no mention that I can find of how to create a CEP compatible certificate for the pix... any help much appreciated. thanks, Ciaron - Original Message - From: Paul Jin To: Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: Re: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263] > VoIP Guy wrote: > > > > If traffic shaping, do both sides match?Are you doing any > > FRF.12 > > fragmentation? Are you sure the traffic shaping paramaters > > are OK? I have > > a feeling this is it. Make sure both sides match. > > > > > > The TS statements both match on both ends. > > We have the same type of PVC with same CIR and other parameters > going to other sites and using the same TS configuration. > > And no frame fragmentations. > > I do have it schduled to swap this router out > within 2 weeks. I am hoping it is either the router or > the local cabling to the router. > > We could not get the regular 1720 that we wanted to deploy until Dec so we > have a temp 2501 that the local field company used and I do not know how > steady this router is. > > thanks > Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26421&t=26263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can somebody recommend good CCIE lab test training class? [7:26423]
I am preparing for the lab test and considering to take a training class, even though I have a pretty good home lab and access to all types of equipment at work. I wonder if anyone can recommand a good train class. Thanks Eric Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26423&t=26423 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
show int | include ... [7:26422]
I wanted to play around with the | include option on the show command, but I can't get it to do what I want, and I can't find any docs on it. I want to include the interface and description of all FastEthernet interfaces. If I do a show int | include FastEthernet it will show the line where it says FastEthernet for all FastEthernet interfaces. Example: SANTA#show int | include FastEthernet FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/2 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/3 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/4 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/5 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/6 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/7 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/8 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/9 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/10 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/11 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/12 is up, line protocol is up If I do a show int | include Description it will show the line where there is a description for all interfaces. Example: SANTA#show int | include Description Description: LINK TO SWITCH IN SUITE 1209 Description: LINK TO HUB IN SUITE 1303 Description: HP LaserJet 4 Plus Description: HP DeskJet 930C Description: FIREWALL Description: Dave Description: Cindy Description: Lauren Description: Sharon But, how do I get both? I have tried the following with out luck: show int | include FastEthernet Description show int | include FastEthernet , Description show int | include FastEthernet | Description show int | include FastEthernet | include Description show int | include FastEthernet include Description This is one of those stupid command options you've seen so many times, but never used. Any comments? Thanks in advance, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26422&t=26422 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398]
Yes, I do have a goal in mind. I just purchased some wireless equipment and would like to restrict the MAC addresses allowed in. 40 bit encryption is not good enough for the paranoid like me. It seems the network name is advertised. To me, that security really sucks. Besides, it's another challenge. Next, maybe a VPN tunnel. :-) Ken >>> "Howard C. Berkowitz" 11/15/01 02:24PM >>> >I am wanting to configure a mac-address filter on my switch but need some >help. Has anyone done this? > >Thanks. > >Ken Well, yes. But to coin a phrase, and to put it into a better context, what problem are you trying to solve? I find people learn better when they have a goal in mind, then look at configuration alternatives and how they relate to the problem. Howard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26424&t=26398 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: show int | include ... [7:26422]
The include option works like grep in unix. AFAIK, there is no way to do what you want from the command line. You could add the words "FastEthernet" to each description! :-) Then, show int | inc FastEthernet would work. John >>> "Ole Drews Jensen" 11/15/01 4:10:43 PM >>> I wanted to play around with the | include option on the show command, but I can't get it to do what I want, and I can't find any docs on it. I want to include the interface and description of all FastEthernet interfaces. If I do a show int | include FastEthernet it will show the line where it says FastEthernet for all FastEthernet interfaces. Example: SANTA#show int | include FastEthernet FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/2 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/3 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/4 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/5 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/6 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/7 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/8 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/9 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/10 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/11 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/12 is up, line protocol is up If I do a show int | include Description it will show the line where there is a description for all interfaces. Example: SANTA#show int | include Description Description: LINK TO SWITCH IN SUITE 1209 Description: LINK TO HUB IN SUITE 1303 Description: HP LaserJet 4 Plus Description: HP DeskJet 930C Description: FIREWALL Description: Dave Description: Cindy Description: Lauren Description: Sharon But, how do I get both? I have tried the following with out luck: show int | include FastEthernet Description show int | include FastEthernet , Description show int | include FastEthernet | Description show int | include FastEthernet | include Description show int | include FastEthernet include Description This is one of those stupid command options you've seen so many times, but never used. Any comments? Thanks in advance, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26425&t=26422 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: show int | include ... [7:26422]
show int | include FastE|Description i usually wind up entering show int | include line|Description|Internet this feature is the reason i find any excuse at all to avoid working with routers bearing 11.x IOS. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120t/120t1/cliparse.htm "Ole Drews Jensen" @groupstudy.com on 11/15/2001 06:10:43 PM Please respond to "Ole Drews Jensen" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Kevin Cullimore) Subject: show int | include ... [7:26422] I wanted to play around with the | include option on the show command, but I can't get it to do what I want, and I can't find any docs on it. I want to include the interface and description of all FastEthernet interfaces. If I do a show int | include FastEthernet it will show the line where it says FastEthernet for all FastEthernet interfaces. Example: SANTA#show int | include FastEthernet FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/2 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/3 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/4 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/5 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/6 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/7 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/8 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/9 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/10 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/11 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/12 is up, line protocol is up If I do a show int | include Description it will show the line where there is a description for all interfaces. Example: SANTA#show int | include Description Description: LINK TO SWITCH IN SUITE 1209 Description: LINK TO HUB IN SUITE 1303 Description: HP LaserJet 4 Plus Description: HP DeskJet 930C Description: FIREWALL Description: Dave Description: Cindy Description: Lauren Description: Sharon But, how do I get both? I have tried the following with out luck: show int | include FastEthernet Description show int | include FastEthernet , Description show int | include FastEthernet | Description show int | include FastEthernet | include Description show int | include FastEthernet include Description This is one of those stupid command options you've seen so many times, but never used. Any comments? Thanks in advance, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26426&t=26422 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cache/Congent Engine and DS3 Issue [7:26427]
Hello, I wanted to know if anyone has experienced any issues with slow internet response after installing a Content/Cache Engine 509? I recently installed on on an Internet Router with a DS3. Internet response slowed down significantly. Whereas pages would time out and users complained. The slowstart feature is enabled as well. I did however come accross a FAQ stating that there should be DNS pointer records for the Cache/Content Engine. Any advice/experience? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26427&t=26427 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4500 or 4500M [7:26428]
I know this has been answered @ least 2 or 3 times since I have been on the list, but... does anyone have the CCO link that show's how to depict which is which ??? Thanks !!! Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26428&t=26428 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920]
All, Currently I am using the IPexpert.net lab as part of my preperation. I am also getting ready for my second attempt at the one day lab. Having been through the new format, I am very comfortable that the IPexpert.net materials cover a VERY LARGE portion of the material you will need to know for the lab. That being said I don't think any one lab manual will catch all the unusual stuff you could be presented with on the actual test, but you will have a solid chance. The book is decieving small in size. It takes FOREVER to actually go through it.Worth every penny. David Hurbanis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26429&t=24920 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anybody know any good links for CISCO/IS-IS information? [7:26430]
You might be surprised just how much IS-IS you understand, if you already have OSPF down. I think MCI is the ISP that still uses quite a bit of IS-IS within their network. http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:ISIS All the best !!! Phil - Original Message - From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" To: Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:58 PM Subject: RE: Anybody know any good links for CISCO/IS-IS information? [7:26414] > Next month's CertificationZone paper is Part 2 of Peter van Oene's > ISIS, which will be available free for one month. > > Look around www.nanog.org. There are several presentations both by > Cisco and Juniper. The Juniper stuff is relevant because Dave Katz > wrote both the Cisco and Juniper ISIS code. > > > >The Best source of information that I have ever found on IS-IS is in Routing > >TCP/IP Version 1 by Jeff Doyle. Good resource! > > > >Adam Brzyski > >Design Engineer II > >CCIE #8082, NNCDE > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Paul Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:58 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Anybody know any good links for CISCO/IS-IS information? > > > > > >Hey gang, > > > >Anyone know any good links, or where I can find out more info on using CISCO > > > >routers with IS-IS? > > > >Paul Andersen > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26430&t=26430 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off Topic - Baystack 350T [7:26431]
I was given a Baystack 350t and I'm trying to get into it to set up the configuration. I am using the default settings (9600,8,1,no,1,none). I am entering ctrl+C as per documentation. I get no response. I could use suggestions from anyone who has used this switch. TIA Mark Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26431&t=26431 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920]
Also, you can look on ebay. CCBootcamp is normally selling the labs for $50 to $75 off the website price. I am using both the ccbootcamp and IPexpert labs and am equally impressed with both. >From: "Thompson, Kenny (K.)" >Reply-To: "Thompson, Kenny (K.)" >To: "'Jeremy Wright'" , [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] >Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:33:55 -0500 > >ouch! That was hard, but I think I will go with your suggestion Jeremy. In >the mean time do you know the site for the ccboot camp so I can get the lab >material. > >Rgds > >kenny > >-Original Message- >From: Jeremy Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:00 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] > > >You've been selling your labs since July and no one >has passed using them? I'd say they are a complete >waste of money if that's the case. I've met the guys >from ccbootcamp and I guarantee they run a first class >operation. I think the smartest move is to use what >has a proven track record in the CCIE process. > > > > > From: ""Michael Cinquanti"" > > Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco > > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 6:12 PM > > Subject: Re: CCIE Lab Preparation Workbook [7:24920] > > > > > > > I too am completely biased (since I'm the > > Publisher of CertificationZone > > > and we sell the IPexpert Lab Workbook), but the > > fact that Mr. Ellis knows > > > 150 CCIEs who have used his service does not > > support the idea that > > > one Lab reference is the *best choice*. Since the > > ZONE has only been > > > selling the IPexpert Lab Workbook since July, Brad > > knows that we do not > > yet > > > have 150 customers who have used our book and > > passed the Lab Exam. But > > > based on the way our book is flying off the shelf > > and based on the fact > > > that qualified reviewers have told us that our > > reference is an excellent > > > study > > > tool, I suspect that it won't be too long before > > we do have that many > > > CCIEs and more. > > > > > > As for constant updating, in the past three > > months, the IPexpert Workbook > > > has been updated two times and already includes a > > sample lab in the new > > > one-day format. Yet another Update is being > > prepared now and will be > > > distributed, free-of-charge, to anyone who owns a > > previous version. > > > > > > We have also had people who've passed the lab and > > people who've failed the > > > lab review our book from cover-to-cover. The > > results are unanimous. They > > > think the IPexpert Book is a great preparation > > resource for the Lab Exam > > > and worth every penny it costs. We've published > > one such review (from a > > guy > > > who's currently preparing for his second Lab Exam > > attempt) at the ZONE > > > website. We should have a second review (from a > > guy who's already earned > > > his CCIE) posted at the site sometime this month. > > > > > > But I can't answer Pieter-Jan's original question > > -- and neither can Brad > > > Ellis. Postings on Newsgroups and Mailing Lists > > can be helpful, but don't > > > depend completely on what you read there. I urge > > all CCIE lab candidates > > > looking for appropriate references to examine all > > the alternatives > > > carefully. Visit the websites, use e-mail and > > those toll free phone > > > numbers, examine the qualifications of the > > authors, ask for references, > > and > > > contact those references directly. If you find two > > you like and can afford > > > to do so, buy them both. Good luck with the Lab > > Exam. > > > > > > >I am completely biased (since I am one of the > > owner's of NLI), but I do > > know > > > >of over 150 CCIE's that have used the ccbootcamp > > labs to get their > > CCIE...I > > > >havent heard of one CCIE yet that has used the > > other labs to get their #. > > > >:) > > > > > > > >Also, the bootcamp labs are constantly being > > updated and added on to. In > > > >fact, we are in the process of modifying all of > > our old labs by removing > > the > > > >obsolete technology and changing them to a 1-day > > format (which means we > > give > > > >you pre-config files with IP addresses, not a > > real big deal there). > > > > > > > >thanks, > > > >-Brad Ellis > > > >CCIE#5796 > > > >Network Learning Inc > > > >www.ccbootcamp.com > > > > > > > >""Pieter-Jan Bakhuyzen"" wrote in message > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> I'm looking to buy a CCIE Lab Workbook to > > prepare for my CCIE Lab in > > June > > > >> 2002. > > > >> I've found the following two on the net: > > > >> > > > >> - Certificationzone - IPexpert Lab Preparation > > Workbook 2.0 > > > >> - CCBootcamp - CCIE LAB Package Subscription > > > >> > > > >> Has anybody used these and which one is > > considered the best choice? > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> > > > >> Pieter-Jan Bakhuyzen > > > >>
RE: Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398]
Ken, this comes up regularly with customers who want to do wireless, as if wireless will solve some great problem of theirs. well, in the case of my customers, there are indeed some great vertical applications that make this a wonderful technology. but... yes, mac filtering is one way to provide some modicum of security. spoofing mac's is not the first thing that enters the hacker's mind, so I've heard, but I would not rely on any one method to ensure a secure net. remember that there are several "wireless sniffers" available, so mac information can be decoded, and later spoofed. some folks I have spoken with do a number of things, including WEP, LEAP, and IPSec or L2TP from the wireless end device into the network, end to end. some folks go so far as to encrypt everything on storage devices, so that even if the wireless authentication is broken, it does hacker no good. if your app is hand-held based these may not be options. then you are back to the mac filtering. still, you might want to think about upping to 128 WEP anyway. how concerned are you about the integrity and confidentiality of the data going over the wireless? more so or less so than if that same data were available via VPN across the internet or via dial up access? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Diliberto Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398] Yes, I do have a goal in mind. I just purchased some wireless equipment and would like to restrict the MAC addresses allowed in. 40 bit encryption is not good enough for the paranoid like me. It seems the network name is advertised. To me, that security really sucks. Besides, it's another challenge. Next, maybe a VPN tunnel. :-) Ken >>> "Howard C. Berkowitz" 11/15/01 02:24PM >>> >I am wanting to configure a mac-address filter on my switch but need some >help. Has anyone done this? > >Thanks. > >Ken Well, yes. But to coin a phrase, and to put it into a better context, what problem are you trying to solve? I find people learn better when they have a goal in mind, then look at configuration alternatives and how they relate to the problem. Howard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26432&t=26398 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anybody know any good links for CISCO/IS-IS information? [7:26433]
Many ISP's use IS-IS. We recently converted from OSPF to IS-IS but I'm not in the "we" part of the company so my IS-IS knowledge is still book knowlegde not pratical Dave Circusnuts wrote: > You might be surprised just how much IS-IS you understand, if you already > have OSPF down. I think MCI is the ISP that still uses quite a bit of IS-IS > within their network. > > http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:ISIS > > All the best !!! > Phil > > - Original Message - > From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" > To: > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:58 PM > Subject: RE: Anybody know any good links for CISCO/IS-IS information? > [7:26414] > > > Next month's CertificationZone paper is Part 2 of Peter van Oene's > > ISIS, which will be available free for one month. > > > > Look around www.nanog.org. There are several presentations both by > > Cisco and Juniper. The Juniper stuff is relevant because Dave Katz > > wrote both the Cisco and Juniper ISIS code. > > > > > > >The Best source of information that I have ever found on IS-IS is in > Routing > > >TCP/IP Version 1 by Jeff Doyle. Good resource! > > > > > >Adam Brzyski > > >Design Engineer II > > >CCIE #8082, NNCDE > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Paul Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:58 PM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Anybody know any good links for CISCO/IS-IS information? > > > > > > > > >Hey gang, > > > > > >Anyone know any good links, or where I can find out more info on using > CISCO > > > > > >routers with IS-IS? > > > > > >Paul Andersen > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Senior Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26433&t=26433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic - Baystack 350T [7:26431]
At 09:47 PM 11/15/01 -0500, Mark Rose wrote: >I was given a Baystack 350t and I'm trying to get into it to set up the >configuration. I am using the default settings (9600,8,1,no,1,none). I am >entering ctrl+C as per documentation. I get no response. I could use >suggestions from anyone who has used this switch. > >TIA >Mark Try ctrl-d, enter, etc. If it does not work, it might just be a bad one. I did an audit with a pile of these darn bay stacks, and some of them would just REFUSE to work. Of course, since we audited so many of them, 80% of them were consoleable, the others failed. Ah well. -Carroll Kong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26434&t=26431 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help me set clock on router [7:26435]
Dear group Psl show me Why is ? When I set clock on rouer 2500 ,2600,3660 serial , but If I reload router . My router not save clock then return *01:41:38.137 UTC Thu Mar 4 1993 Thank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26435&t=26435 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398]
Welcome to the next big security nightmare. There are so many issues with trying to secure the access point, at some point you'll just want to sit in a corner with your arms around your knees rocking. In the meantime, here are a couple of thoughts/issues to look at. 1. Running WEP is almost useless. At least with WEP you've left the key under the doormat, not in the lock. One issue that you'll run across with higher encryption levels with WEP is the variance in network card software across manufacturers. Of the 4 different cards that we've had on the network here, we've had 4 sets of maximum and minimum key lengths, and there is no happy medium. 2. Running MAC filtering is good, if you want to keep track of all the MACs that you'll end up with. Anyone who has ever worked a network that used it's own MAC scheme knows what I'm talking about. Another issue that we've run into with MAC filtering is the lack of ease of distributing your filter list across multiple access points. (I'm a bit of a hypocrite - we use MAC filtering on our network ;-} ) 3. The ability to disable responding to a broadcast on your access point is a great start. Our Orinoco (I know, Avaya sucks) access points have a setting that tells the unit to not respond to any requests unless the card is set with the same network name as the base station. This won't stop somebody sniffing, but it does hide the unit from the apps that initially find the access points. 4. Accept that you'll have to use a different method for security, and plan your platform/app around it. We have had great success with Movian on our WinCE handhelds, connecting to an interface on a VPN-3030 in order to access the network. I know that this setup also works with a PIX, as it was our test environment. 5. Watch out for cars with funny antennas and laptops on the front seat. (#3 takes care of part of this problem.) That all said, I think we as industry professionals have a lot to learn about deploying a secure wireless network. I do know that whenever I deploy one, I start the design process by putting on my paranoid hat. Good luck, and good learning. Andras -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398] Ken, this comes up regularly with customers who want to do wireless, as if wireless will solve some great problem of theirs. well, in the case of my customers, there are indeed some great vertical applications that make this a wonderful technology. but... yes, mac filtering is one way to provide some modicum of security. spoofing mac's is not the first thing that enters the hacker's mind, so I've heard, but I would not rely on any one method to ensure a secure net. remember that there are several "wireless sniffers" available, so mac information can be decoded, and later spoofed. some folks I have spoken with do a number of things, including WEP, LEAP, and IPSec or L2TP from the wireless end device into the network, end to end. some folks go so far as to encrypt everything on storage devices, so that even if the wireless authentication is broken, it does hacker no good. if your app is hand-held based these may not be options. then you are back to the mac filtering. still, you might want to think about upping to 128 WEP anyway. how concerned are you about the integrity and confidentiality of the data going over the wireless? more so or less so than if that same data were available via VPN across the internet or via dial up access? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Diliberto Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398] Yes, I do have a goal in mind. I just purchased some wireless equipment and would like to restrict the MAC addresses allowed in. 40 bit encryption is not good enough for the paranoid like me. It seems the network name is advertised. To me, that security really sucks. Besides, it's another challenge. Next, maybe a VPN tunnel. :-) Ken >>> "Howard C. Berkowitz" 11/15/01 02:24PM >>> >I am wanting to configure a mac-address filter on my switch but need some >help. Has anyone done this? > >Thanks. > >Ken Well, yes. But to coin a phrase, and to put it into a better context, what problem are you trying to solve? I find people learn better when they have a goal in mind, then look at configuration alternatives and how they relate to the problem. Howard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26436&t=26398 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: North Carolina User Groups [7:25895]
Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if your interested. ""GroupStudy.com"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey, so am I..I would like be apart of a group of some kind... > > ""Todd Carswell"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > No, but I'd like to get in touch with one! I'm in Raleigh. > > > > Thx > > > > Todd > > > > > > ""Macsyn"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Does anyone know of any cisco user groups in North Carolina? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26439&t=25895 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: show int | include ... [7:26422]
THANKS!! That worked - incredible that you cannot use spaces between the searched words and the |'s. The only questions left now is what if you only want to see the interfaces that are FastEthernet AND has a description :-) ??? I guess that's not possible, but it's worth a try... Thanks again Kevin, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.RouterChief.com NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: show int | include ... [7:26422] show int | include FastE|Description i usually wind up entering show int | include line|Description|Internet this feature is the reason i find any excuse at all to avoid working with routers bearing 11.x IOS. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120 t/120t1/cliparse.htm "Ole Drews Jensen" @groupstudy.com on 11/15/2001 06:10:43 PM Please respond to "Ole Drews Jensen" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Kevin Cullimore) Subject: show int | include ... [7:26422] I wanted to play around with the | include option on the show command, but I can't get it to do what I want, and I can't find any docs on it. I want to include the interface and description of all FastEthernet interfaces. If I do a show int | include FastEthernet it will show the line where it says FastEthernet for all FastEthernet interfaces. Example: SANTA#show int | include FastEthernet FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/2 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/3 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/4 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/5 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/6 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/7 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/8 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/9 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/10 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/11 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/12 is up, line protocol is up If I do a show int | include Description it will show the line where there is a description for all interfaces. Example: SANTA#show int | include Description Description: LINK TO SWITCH IN SUITE 1209 Description: LINK TO HUB IN SUITE 1303 Description: HP LaserJet 4 Plus Description: HP DeskJet 930C Description: FIREWALL Description: Dave Description: Cindy Description: Lauren Description: Sharon But, how do I get both? I have tried the following with out luck: show int | include FastEthernet Description show int | include FastEthernet , Description show int | include FastEthernet | Description show int | include FastEthernet | include Description show int | include FastEthernet include Description This is one of those stupid command options you've seen so many times, but never used. Any comments? Thanks in advance, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26437&t=26422 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398]
>Yes, I do have a goal in mind. I just purchased some wireless equipment and
>would like to restrict the MAC addresses allowed in. 40 bit encryption is
>not good enough for the paranoid like me. It seems the network name is
>advertised. To me, that security really sucks.
OK. I'll assume the filter is at the ingress switch, and you want to
use the source address as a safeguard.
First, let's review the command:
access-list access-list-number {permit | deny} address mask
700-799
what confuses some people is the address is the 48-bit MAC
address and the mask is also 48 bits. Otherwise, the masking logic is
just like an IP access list.
Let's say you want to permit all sources with the Cisco manufacturer
code 0c (there are others). You don't care what the other 24 bits
are.
Therefore, your access list rule would be
access-list 700 permit .0c00. .00FF.
You could have an access-list rule for each device, with a
.. mask. Think long and hard about how you would maintain
that
>
>Besides, it's another challenge. Next, maybe a VPN tunnel. :-)
>
>Ken
>
"Howard C. Berkowitz" 11/15/01 02:24PM >>>
>>I am wanting to configure a mac-address filter on my switch but need some
>>help. Has anyone done this?
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Ken
>
>Well, yes. But to coin a phrase, and to put it into a better context,
>what problem are you trying to solve? I find people learn better
>when they have a goal in mind, then look at configuration
>alternatives and how they relate to the problem.
>
>Howard
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26440&t=26398
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: show int | include ... [7:26422]
Actually John, you CAN do it. See the reply I got from Kevin Cullimore. Thanks, Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.RouterChief.com NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 5:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: show int | include ... [7:26422] The include option works like grep in unix. AFAIK, there is no way to do what you want from the command line. You could add the words "FastEthernet" to each description! :-) Then, show int | inc FastEthernet would work. John >>> "Ole Drews Jensen" 11/15/01 4:10:43 PM >>> I wanted to play around with the | include option on the show command, but I can't get it to do what I want, and I can't find any docs on it. I want to include the interface and description of all FastEthernet interfaces. If I do a show int | include FastEthernet it will show the line where it says FastEthernet for all FastEthernet interfaces. Example: SANTA#show int | include FastEthernet FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/2 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/3 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/4 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/5 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/6 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/7 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/8 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/9 is up, line protocol is up FastEthernet0/10 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/11 is down, line protocol is down FastEthernet0/12 is up, line protocol is up If I do a show int | include Description it will show the line where there is a description for all interfaces. Example: SANTA#show int | include Description Description: LINK TO SWITCH IN SUITE 1209 Description: LINK TO HUB IN SUITE 1303 Description: HP LaserJet 4 Plus Description: HP DeskJet 930C Description: FIREWALL Description: Dave Description: Cindy Description: Lauren Description: Sharon But, how do I get both? I have tried the following with out luck: show int | include FastEthernet Description show int | include FastEthernet , Description show int | include FastEthernet | Description show int | include FastEthernet | include Description show int | include FastEthernet include Description This is one of those stupid command options you've seen so many times, but never used. Any comments? Thanks in advance, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26438&t=26422 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anybody know any good links for CISCO/IS-IS information? [7:26441]
>You might be surprised just how much IS-IS you understand, if you already >have OSPF down. I think MCI is the ISP that still uses quite a bit of IS-IS >within their network. > >http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:ISIS > >All the best !!! >Phil Might you have this reversed? I know MCI at least used to use OSPF for their frame relay aggregation network, but I'd say most _large_ ISPs use ISIS. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26441&t=26441 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: help me set clock on router [7:26435]
HK, To the best of my knowledge, 25x, 26x, 36x don't have a battery, like in a computer, to keep the clock setting. When you power down the router the time is lost. You could set your routers up to use ntp (network time protocol) and run the ntp server on your computer or something. In my case, I setup one of the main routers to be a master time server, and have all of my routers pull their time from the main router. Then you just have to change the time on one router instead of all. Be aware that the NTP protocol will take some bandwidth, but I don't think it would be much. Does anybody else have any thoughts? Hope this helps, Scott -Original Message- From: hk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: help me set clock on router [7:26435] Dear group Psl show me Why is ? When I set clock on rouer 2500 ,2600,3660 serial , but If I reload router . My router not save clock then return *01:41:38.137 UTC Thu Mar 4 1993 Thank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26442&t=26435 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398]
I missed something in my last reply that some folks might not take for granted - once you have sniffed the mac address of a wireless card, changing your card to match is simple - I did it on a card integrated into a notebook inside of 30 seconds - you set it in the GUI even. Andras -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398] Ken, this comes up regularly with customers who want to do wireless, as if wireless will solve some great problem of theirs. well, in the case of my customers, there are indeed some great vertical applications that make this a wonderful technology. but... yes, mac filtering is one way to provide some modicum of security. spoofing mac's is not the first thing that enters the hacker's mind, so I've heard, but I would not rely on any one method to ensure a secure net. remember that there are several "wireless sniffers" available, so mac information can be decoded, and later spoofed. some folks I have spoken with do a number of things, including WEP, LEAP, and IPSec or L2TP from the wireless end device into the network, end to end. some folks go so far as to encrypt everything on storage devices, so that even if the wireless authentication is broken, it does hacker no good. if your app is hand-held based these may not be options. then you are back to the mac filtering. still, you might want to think about upping to 128 WEP anyway. how concerned are you about the integrity and confidentiality of the data going over the wireless? more so or less so than if that same data were available via VPN across the internet or via dial up access? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Diliberto Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mac Address filtering on a 3512XL [7:26398] Yes, I do have a goal in mind. I just purchased some wireless equipment and would like to restrict the MAC addresses allowed in. 40 bit encryption is not good enough for the paranoid like me. It seems the network name is advertised. To me, that security really sucks. Besides, it's another challenge. Next, maybe a VPN tunnel. :-) Ken >>> "Howard C. Berkowitz" 11/15/01 02:24PM >>> >I am wanting to configure a mac-address filter on my switch but need some >help. Has anyone done this? > >Thanks. > >Ken Well, yes. But to coin a phrase, and to put it into a better context, what problem are you trying to solve? I find people learn better when they have a goal in mind, then look at configuration alternatives and how they relate to the problem. Howard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26443&t=26398 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can somebody recommend good CCIE lab test training class? [7:26444]
Eric, I have been at GlobalKnowledge this week and although I was not in this class, they have them and they all use nice equipment and seem to be thorough... www.globalknowledge.com Eric An wrote: >I am preparing for the lab test and considering to take a training class, >even though I have a pretty good home lab and access to all types of >equipment at work. > >I wonder if anyone can recommand a good train class. > >Thanks > >Eric Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26444&t=26444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can somebody recommend good CCIE lab test training class? [7:26445]
Have you passed your written test? Assuming so, there are many references in the archives of ccielab. There are several options available and you can choose based on cost, schedule, and location. I recommend the netmasterclass RS-NMC-1 course, taught by the CCIE's who wrote the book, and who developed the BRS and ECP1/2 courses, Caslow and Pavlichenko. (note - I am affiliated with NMC.) http://www.netmasterclass.net for details. Do not enroll with anyone claiming to be teaching the ECP1 or ECP2 class; Mentor Technologies is in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, and the principal instructors for the old ECP courses are now teaching the one day lab RS-NMC-1 and RS-NMC-2 courses. HTH, Fred. Eric An wrote: > > I am preparing for the lab test and considering to take a training class, > even though I have a pretty good home lab and access to all types of > equipment at work. > > I wonder if anyone can recommand a good train class. > > Thanks > > Eric Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26445&t=26445 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can frame-relay multipoint sub-interfaces support inverse [7:26446]
Fred "Ng, Kim Seng David (David)" wrote: > > Hi, > > I was a bit confused after reading the Ciscopress CCNP Support book and > Caslow's ccie book. Can frame-relay multipoint sub-interfaces support > inverse arp DLCI mappings?? Ciscopress Support book seem to say no (not > directly though) but Caslow's book says yes. Thanks in advance... > > David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26446&t=26446 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filtering SAPs in NLSP [7:26447]
I have searched in the archives to no avail to find the answer to this question. The question has been asked many times, but no answer seems to have ever been given. Can you granuarly filter SAP in NLSP? Either they are all there, or they are all gone? If I have the follwing SAPs: 4 File1 44.0.0.1 451 1 4 File2 44.0.0.1 451 1 4 File3 44.0.0.1 451 1 With IPX RIP or EIGRP I can use an access list such as: access-list 1000 deny -1 44.0.0.1 4 File1 access-list 1000 permit -1 and they apply it to the interface and File1 will disappear, but the other two will come through. With NLSP it dosen't work. They all come through still. I have tried input-sap-filter, distribute-sap-filter, under the routing process, anything I could think of but I can't make it remove just one of them. Any help would be great. Thanks. Bill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26447&t=26447 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
