RE: Venting about another employee [was Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply]

2001-04-08 Thread Bob Vance

What he said.
:)
I was about to fire off a missive, when I noticed that everything that I
wanted to say was contained herein(after, as well :), hereinafter
referred to as "content", said content solely the property of Greg,
hereinafter referred to, both on and off the "list" (see section 6.2.1,
subsection 3.b, paragraph 1) as "Old Guy", said content being wholly
derived, thunk up, and maintained by Old Guy.  All rights to content
remain with Old Guy, with no liability incurred by Old Guy for any
misuse, misunderstanding, or misrepresentation of said content.


-
Tks| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BV | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Technical Consultant,  SBM, A Gates/Arrow Co.
Vox 770-623-3430   11455 Lakefield Dr.
Fax 770-623-3429   Duluth, GA 30097-1511
=


 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:30 AM
 To: The.Rock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


 "certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with
that
 statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
subject
 matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to
become
 more knowledgeable.

 Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
 (albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
willingness
 to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
 foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only
a
 passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture --
but
I
 assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
upon
 that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
 steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with
my
 certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
 dangerous! smile

 I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
 degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any
area,
but
 they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for
example,
 may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back
yard
on
 the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and
passing
 a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does
indicate
the
 individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become
an
 expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes
for
 physicians, accountants, architects, etc.

 I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
 Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an
entry
 ticket into this career.  Individuals who possess these certs should
be
 respected for the time, effort and interest they have shown in
studying
for
 and obtaining a cert.  But whether they are PAPER CERTS is truly a
 mischaracterization.  As I put forth above, every academic or
professional
 degree is indeed initially a paper cert -- but with potential.  IT
folks
who
 obtain these certs by and large have the potential to succeed.  Just
as
 there are bright, average and incompetent lawyers, doctors and others,
the
 same would hold true in our field.  Some individuals in inately
intuitive,
 without certs, and others -- the majority -- will become the average
IT
 Joe/Jane who work day-to-day in this field.  Certainly there will
always
be
 the small numbers who are totally incompetent.  But it is not because
the
 certs are merely paper.

 That's my 2 cents.

 Greg Macaulay, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
 Attorney/Law Professor (Retired)
 Lifetime member of AARP
 Oldest CCNP/CCDP in existence
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: Venting about another employee [was Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply]

2001-04-07 Thread J Roysdon

It all has to do with where you (or the person making the comments) are
coming from.  Someone without certs won't value them at all.  Someone with a
number of certs will usually place a high value on the certs.

Of course, experience is everything.  We've a guy at our office with his
MCSE+DBA who couldn't recall any SQL if you asked him today.  He took and
passed the 3 required SQL tests last year after brain-dumping and taking
them repeatedly (2-3 times per test, I believe).  Every time we get an SQL
problem, I love sending the call to him and then watch him try to wiggle his
way out of it.

It took him 3 tries to pass the CCNAv2, and now he's on to the CCNP.  He
wanted to know why he should do the Remote Access test instead of the
Routing test.  He's worked with ISDN and T1s and perhaps a few frame
connections.  I asked him, "What can you tell me about OSPF, EIGRP or BGP,"
and he said, "EIGRP is a routing protocol like RIP, and I guess the rest are
routing protocols."

Sorry, I'm venting.  I'm just hoping we're not paying him much.  I've run
across a number of people I'd like to hire to replace him.  His idea of
research is beeping everyone in the office on their Nextels until he finds
out what he needs.

It was the funniest night:  3 of us were sitting around last year playing
with Windows 2000.  I got the first beep from him, asking a general
question, and I replied back with a general answer.  He beeped one of the
other guys in the room with me with a question asking," How do I do 'such
and such'."  The question was the exact general answer I'd given him.  That
co-worker then replied with some more specific info, and suggested looking
it up on CCO.  Next thing we know, not 5 seconds later, he beeps the third
engineer in the room and asked him some more details.

Anyway, our general feeling about the guy is to ignore him unless there is
absolutely nothing else going on.  It's one thing to be totally stuck and
need a little guidance, but once you're given some guidance, use it until
you hit another wall, not just to ask more intelligent questions.

My boss just keeps telling me, "Just send him all your grunt work."  But
even that isn't much solace to me, ask he usually screws up even grunt work
and it's just easier to do it myself than delegate to him.


--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/


"Scott Baron" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Has anyone noticed that people arguing the most that certs dont matter are
 the ones that haven't 'bothered' to get them.

 I know that isn't true for everyone... so don't flame me but... see where
 generalities get you!  How shortsited can you be to simply make a blanket
 statement... certs don't prove anything... geez.

 Scott M. Baron
 CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA

 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:30 AM
 To: The.Rock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


 "certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
 statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
subject
 matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
 more knowledgeable.

 Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
 (albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
willingness
 to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
 foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
 passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but
I
 assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
upon
 that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
 steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
 certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
 dangerous! smile

 I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
 degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area,
but
 they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for example,
 may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard
on
 the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and
passing
 a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate
the
 individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become an
 expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes for
 physicians, accountants, architects, etc.

 I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
 Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an entry
 ticket into this career.  Individuals who posses

RE: Venting about another employee [was Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply]

2001-04-07 Thread Dennis Laganiere

That guy works at your place too?  Wow, he must get around... :-)

--- Dennis

-Original Message-
From: J Roysdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Venting about another employee [was Re: Cisco Certs
Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply]


It all has to do with where you (or the person making the comments) are
coming from.  Someone without certs won't value them at all.  Someone with a
number of certs will usually place a high value on the certs.

Of course, experience is everything.  We've a guy at our office with his
MCSE+DBA who couldn't recall any SQL if you asked him today.  He took and
passed the 3 required SQL tests last year after brain-dumping and taking
them repeatedly (2-3 times per test, I believe).  Every time we get an SQL
problem, I love sending the call to him and then watch him try to wiggle his
way out of it.

It took him 3 tries to pass the CCNAv2, and now he's on to the CCNP.  He
wanted to know why he should do the Remote Access test instead of the
Routing test.  He's worked with ISDN and T1s and perhaps a few frame
connections.  I asked him, "What can you tell me about OSPF, EIGRP or BGP,"
and he said, "EIGRP is a routing protocol like RIP, and I guess the rest are
routing protocols."

Sorry, I'm venting.  I'm just hoping we're not paying him much.  I've run
across a number of people I'd like to hire to replace him.  His idea of
research is beeping everyone in the office on their Nextels until he finds
out what he needs.

It was the funniest night:  3 of us were sitting around last year playing
with Windows 2000.  I got the first beep from him, asking a general
question, and I replied back with a general answer.  He beeped one of the
other guys in the room with me with a question asking," How do I do 'such
and such'."  The question was the exact general answer I'd given him.  That
co-worker then replied with some more specific info, and suggested looking
it up on CCO.  Next thing we know, not 5 seconds later, he beeps the third
engineer in the room and asked him some more details.

Anyway, our general feeling about the guy is to ignore him unless there is
absolutely nothing else going on.  It's one thing to be totally stuck and
need a little guidance, but once you're given some guidance, use it until
you hit another wall, not just to ask more intelligent questions.

My boss just keeps telling me, "Just send him all your grunt work."  But
even that isn't much solace to me, ask he usually screws up even grunt work
and it's just easier to do it myself than delegate to him.


--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/


"Scott Baron" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Has anyone noticed that people arguing the most that certs dont matter are
 the ones that haven't 'bothered' to get them.

 I know that isn't true for everyone... so don't flame me but... see where
 generalities get you!  How shortsited can you be to simply make a blanket
 statement... certs don't prove anything... geez.

 Scott M. Baron
 CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA

 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:30 AM
 To: The.Rock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


 "certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
 statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
subject
 matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
 more knowledgeable.

 Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
 (albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
willingness
 to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
 foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
 passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but
I
 assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
upon
 that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
 steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
 certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
 dangerous! smile

 I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
 degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area,
but
 they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for example,
 may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard
on
 the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and
passing
 a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate
the
 individual has the foundational knowledge and the potenti

Re: Venting about another employee [was Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply]

2001-04-07 Thread Traceroute

Had a similar situation last year, guy is a fake CCNA, lies his way into the
company (interview and all) gets a more senior position, then starts asking me
and everyone else how to do stuff and blowing off assignments until someone
does them. So I think h oppurtunity!, I start happily doing his work (boss
knows) and working on CCNA and then CCNP. Guy continues screwing off and even
sneaks away from work (everyone knows), so whats next?, he dissapears once too
many, gets fired and I get his job and a fat raise to go along with the CCNP
stamp and good on the job experience.. Happy Ending ;-)

Cheers!
George Murphy CCNP

It all has to do with where you (or the person making the comments) are
coming from.  Someone without certs won't value them at all.  Someone with a
number of certs will usually place a high value on the certs.

Of course, experience is everything.  We've a guy at our office with his
MCSE+DBA who couldn't recall any SQL if you asked him today.  He took and
passed the 3 required SQL tests last year after brain-dumping and taking
them repeatedly (2-3 times per test, I believe).  Every time we get an SQL
problem, I love sending the call to him and then watch him try to wiggle his
way out of it.

It took him 3 tries to pass the CCNAv2, and now he's on to the CCNP.  He
wanted to know why he should do the Remote Access test instead of the
Routing test.  He's worked with ISDN and T1s and perhaps a few frame
connections.  I asked him, "What can you tell me about OSPF, EIGRP or BGP,"
and he said, "EIGRP is a routing protocol like RIP, and I guess the rest are
routing protocols."

Sorry, I'm venting.  I'm just hoping we're not paying him much.  I've run
across a number of people I'd like to hire to replace him.  His idea of
research is beeping everyone in the office on their Nextels until he finds
out what he needs.

It was the funniest night:  3 of us were sitting around last year playing
with Windows 2000.  I got the first beep from him, asking a general
question, and I replied back with a general answer.  He beeped one of the
other guys in the room with me with a question asking," How do I do 'such
and such'."  The question was the exact general answer I'd given him.  That
co-worker then replied with some more specific info, and suggested looking
it up on CCO.  Next thing we know, not 5 seconds later, he beeps the third
engineer in the room and asked him some more details.

Anyway, our general feeling about the guy is to ignore him unless there is
absolutely nothing else going on.  It's one thing to be totally stuck and
need a little guidance, but once you're given some guidance, use it until
you hit another wall, not just to ask more intelligent questions.

My boss just keeps telling me, "Just send him all your grunt work."  But
even that isn't much solace to me, ask he usually screws up even grunt work
and it's just easier to do it myself than delegate to him.


--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/


"Scott Baron" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Has anyone noticed that people arguing the most that certs dont matter are
 the ones that haven't 'bothered' to get them.

 I know that isn't true for everyone... so don't flame me but... see where
 generalities get you!  How shortsited can you be to simply make a blanket
 statement... certs don't prove anything... geez.

 Scott M. Baron
 CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA

 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:30 AM
 To: The.Rock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


 "certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
 statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
subject
 matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
 more knowledgeable.

 Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
 (albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
willingness
 to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
 foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
 passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but
I
 assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
upon
 that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
 steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
 certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
 dangerous! smile

 I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
 degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area,
but
 they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawye

RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply

2001-04-03 Thread Greg Macaulay

"certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the subject
matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
more knowledgeable.

Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
(albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some willingness
to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but I
assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build upon
that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
dangerous! smile

I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area, but
they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for example,
may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard on
the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and passing
a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate the
individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become an
expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes for
physicians, accountants, architects, etc.

I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an entry
ticket into this career.  Individuals who possess these certs should be
respected for the time, effort and interest they have shown in studying for
and obtaining a cert.  But whether they are PAPER CERTS is truly a
mischaracterization.  As I put forth above, every academic or professional
degree is indeed initially a paper cert -- but with potential.  IT folks who
obtain these certs by and large have the potential to succeed.  Just as
there are bright, average and incompetent lawyers, doctors and others, the
same would hold true in our field.  Some individuals in inately intuitive,
without certs, and others -- the majority -- will become the average IT
Joe/Jane who work day-to-day in this field.  Certainly there will always be
the small numbers who are totally incompetent.  But it is not because the
certs are merely paper.

That's my 2 cents.

Greg Macaulay, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
Attorney/Law Professor (Retired)
Lifetime member of AARP
Oldest CCNP/CCDP in existence


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
The.Rock
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock


oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
 you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned. Having
the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say your
8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean you
certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply

2001-04-03 Thread Scott Baron

Has anyone noticed that people arguing the most that certs dont matter are
the ones that haven't 'bothered' to get them.

I know that isn't true for everyone... so don't flame me but... see where
generalities get you!  How shortsited can you be to simply make a blanket
statement... certs don't prove anything... geez.

Scott M. Baron
CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA

-Original Message-
From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:30 AM
To: The.Rock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


"certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the subject
matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
more knowledgeable.

Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
(albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some willingness
to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but I
assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build upon
that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
dangerous! smile

I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area, but
they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for example,
may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard on
the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and passing
a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate the
individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become an
expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes for
physicians, accountants, architects, etc.

I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an entry
ticket into this career.  Individuals who possess these certs should be
respected for the time, effort and interest they have shown in studying for
and obtaining a cert.  But whether they are PAPER CERTS is truly a
mischaracterization.  As I put forth above, every academic or professional
degree is indeed initially a paper cert -- but with potential.  IT folks who
obtain these certs by and large have the potential to succeed.  Just as
there are bright, average and incompetent lawyers, doctors and others, the
same would hold true in our field.  Some individuals in inately intuitive,
without certs, and others -- the majority -- will become the average IT
Joe/Jane who work day-to-day in this field.  Certainly there will always be
the small numbers who are totally incompetent.  But it is not because the
certs are merely paper.

That's my 2 cents.

Greg Macaulay, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
Attorney/Law Professor (Retired)
Lifetime member of AARP
Oldest CCNP/CCDP in existence


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
The.Rock
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock


oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
 you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned. Having
the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say your
8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean you
certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply

2001-04-03 Thread RG

Very well said!!
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Macaulay" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "The.Rock" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


 "certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
 statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
subject
 matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
 more knowledgeable.

 Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
 (albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
willingness
 to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
 foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
 passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but
I
 assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
upon
 that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
 steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
 certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
 dangerous! smile

 I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
 degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area,
but
 they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for example,
 may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard
on
 the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and
passing
 a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate
the
 individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become an
 expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes for
 physicians, accountants, architects, etc.

 I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
 Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an entry
 ticket into this career.  Individuals who possess these certs should be
 respected for the time, effort and interest they have shown in studying
for
 and obtaining a cert.  But whether they are PAPER CERTS is truly a
 mischaracterization.  As I put forth above, every academic or professional
 degree is indeed initially a paper cert -- but with potential.  IT folks
who
 obtain these certs by and large have the potential to succeed.  Just as
 there are bright, average and incompetent lawyers, doctors and others, the
 same would hold true in our field.  Some individuals in inately intuitive,
 without certs, and others -- the majority -- will become the average IT
 Joe/Jane who work day-to-day in this field.  Certainly there will always
be
 the small numbers who are totally incompetent.  But it is not because the
 certs are merely paper.

 That's my 2 cents.

 Greg Macaulay, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
 Attorney/Law Professor (Retired)
 Lifetime member of AARP
 Oldest CCNP/CCDP in existence


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 The.Rock
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:33 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock


 oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
  you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
 prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned. Having
 the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say
your
 8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean you
 certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply

2001-04-03 Thread Rik

Certs make bad breath a thing of the past... ;-}

CCNP, CCDA, MCSE, MCP+I, MCT, CCP, NNCSA

See how fresh my breath is?  I'm proud of my certs, but I hate typing all of
this stuff!  I attained these certifications as steps in my path of
learning, not as the primary goal.  Of course, they didn't hurt the wallet
either!  Used to be that employers fell for the old "he/she is certified, so
that must indicate ability" line, but I think most have wisened up to that
by now.  Fresh breath helps, but some other quality, such as experience,
hard-working, management skills, etc., is needed to really succeed these
days.

Rik

"Scott Baron" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Has anyone noticed that people arguing the most that certs dont matter are
 the ones that haven't 'bothered' to get them.

 I know that isn't true for everyone... so don't flame me but... see where
 generalities get you!  How shortsited can you be to simply make a blanket
 statement... certs don't prove anything... geez.

 Scott M. Baron
 CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA

 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:30 AM
 To: The.Rock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


 "certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
 statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
subject
 matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
 more knowledgeable.

 Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
 (albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
willingness
 to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
 foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
 passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but
I
 assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
upon
 that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
 steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
 certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
 dangerous! smile

 I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
 degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area,
but
 they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for example,
 may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard
on
 the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and
passing
 a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate
the
 individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become an
 expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes for
 physicians, accountants, architects, etc.

 I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
 Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an entry
 ticket into this career.  Individuals who possess these certs should be
 respected for the time, effort and interest they have shown in studying
for
 and obtaining a cert.  But whether they are PAPER CERTS is truly a
 mischaracterization.  As I put forth above, every academic or professional
 degree is indeed initially a paper cert -- but with potential.  IT folks
who
 obtain these certs by and large have the potential to succeed.  Just as
 there are bright, average and incompetent lawyers, doctors and others, the
 same would hold true in our field.  Some individuals in inately intuitive,
 without certs, and others -- the majority -- will become the average IT
 Joe/Jane who work day-to-day in this field.  Certainly there will always
be
 the small numbers who are totally incompetent.  But it is not because the
 certs are merely paper.

 That's my 2 cents.

 Greg Macaulay, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
 Attorney/Law Professor (Retired)
 Lifetime member of AARP
 Oldest CCNP/CCDP in existence


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 The.Rock
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:33 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock


 oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
  you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
 prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned. Having
 the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say
your
 8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean you
 certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply

2001-04-03 Thread Allen May

Hey...isn't this the thread that went on for days a couple weeks ago and I
cashed in on all the 2 cents and the 2 bobs?  I'm gonna be rich!

- Original Message -
From: "Scott Baron" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


 Has anyone noticed that people arguing the most that certs dont matter are
 the ones that haven't 'bothered' to get them.

 I know that isn't true for everyone... so don't flame me but... see where
 generalities get you!  How shortsited can you be to simply make a blanket
 statement... certs don't prove anything... geez.

 Scott M. Baron
 CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA

 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:30 AM
 To: The.Rock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


 "certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
 statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
subject
 matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
 more knowledgeable.

 Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
 (albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
willingness
 to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
 foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
 passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but
I
 assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
upon
 that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
 steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
 certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
 dangerous! smile

 I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
 degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area,
but
 they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for example,
 may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard
on
 the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and
passing
 a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate
the
 individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become an
 expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes for
 physicians, accountants, architects, etc.

 I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
 Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an entry
 ticket into this career.  Individuals who possess these certs should be
 respected for the time, effort and interest they have shown in studying
for
 and obtaining a cert.  But whether they are PAPER CERTS is truly a
 mischaracterization.  As I put forth above, every academic or professional
 degree is indeed initially a paper cert -- but with potential.  IT folks
who
 obtain these certs by and large have the potential to succeed.  Just as
 there are bright, average and incompetent lawyers, doctors and others, the
 same would hold true in our field.  Some individuals in inately intuitive,
 without certs, and others -- the majority -- will become the average IT
 Joe/Jane who work day-to-day in this field.  Certainly there will always
be
 the small numbers who are totally incompetent.  But it is not because the
 certs are merely paper.

 That's my 2 cents.

 Greg Macaulay, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
 Attorney/Law Professor (Retired)
 Lifetime member of AARP
 Oldest CCNP/CCDP in existence


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 The.Rock
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:33 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock


 oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
  you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
 prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned. Having
 the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say
your
 8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean you
 certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply

2001-04-03 Thread Berger

i totally agree with you.. . . it is an opportunity to learn and get some
sort of recognition of your effort..  some employers don't have a positive
impression of certs merly because of some minorities who 'memorise' exam
questions and actually passed..!  it was a good thing Cisco maintain a high
standard in their questions so that only those who deserve it  will get
it...

cheers for cisco

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
RG
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


Very well said!!
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Macaulay" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "The.Rock" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


 "certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
 statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
subject
 matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
 more knowledgeable.

 Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
 (albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
willingness
 to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
 foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
 passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but
I
 assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
upon
 that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
 steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
 certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
 dangerous! smile

 I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
 degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area,
but
 they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for example,
 may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard
on
 the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and
passing
 a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate
the
 individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become an
 expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes for
 physicians, accountants, architects, etc.

 I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
 Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an entry
 ticket into this career.  Individuals who possess these certs should be
 respected for the time, effort and interest they have shown in studying
for
 and obtaining a cert.  But whether they are PAPER CERTS is truly a
 mischaracterization.  As I put forth above, every academic or professional
 degree is indeed initially a paper cert -- but with potential.  IT folks
who
 obtain these certs by and large have the potential to succeed.  Just as
 there are bright, average and incompetent lawyers, doctors and others, the
 same would hold true in our field.  Some individuals in inately intuitive,
 without certs, and others -- the majority -- will become the average IT
 Joe/Jane who work day-to-day in this field.  Certainly there will always
be
 the small numbers who are totally incompetent.  But it is not because the
 certs are merely paper.

 That's my 2 cents.

 Greg Macaulay, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
 Attorney/Law Professor (Retired)
 Lifetime member of AARP
 Oldest CCNP/CCDP in existence


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 The.Rock
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:33 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock


 oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
  you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
 prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned. Having
 the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say
your
 8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean you
 certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply

2001-04-03 Thread saden

Very well thought out and educated response on certification.

Thank You..

On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Berger wrote:

 i totally agree with you.. . . it is an opportunity to learn and get some
 sort of recognition of your effort..  some employers don't have a positive
 impression of certs merly because of some minorities who 'memorise' exam
 questions and actually passed..!  it was a good thing Cisco maintain a high
 standard in their questions so that only those who deserve it  will get
 it...
 
 cheers for cisco
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 RG
 Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:52 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply
 
 
 Very well said!!
 - Original Message -
 From: "Greg Macaulay" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: "The.Rock" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:30 AM
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply
 
 
  "certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
  statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
 subject
  matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
  more knowledgeable.
 
  Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
  (albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
 willingness
  to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
  foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
  passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but
 I
  assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
 upon
  that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
  steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
  certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
  dangerous! smile
 
  I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
  degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area,
 but
  they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for example,
  may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard
 on
  the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and
 passing
  a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate
 the
  individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become an
  expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes for
  physicians, accountants, architects, etc.
 
  I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
  Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an entry
  ticket into this career.  Individuals who possess these certs should be
  respected for the time, effort and interest they have shown in studying
 for
  and obtaining a cert.  But whether they are PAPER CERTS is truly a
  mischaracterization.  As I put forth above, every academic or professional
  degree is indeed initially a paper cert -- but with potential.  IT folks
 who
  obtain these certs by and large have the potential to succeed.  Just as
  there are bright, average and incompetent lawyers, doctors and others, the
  same would hold true in our field.  Some individuals in inately intuitive,
  without certs, and others -- the majority -- will become the average IT
  Joe/Jane who work day-to-day in this field.  Certainly there will always
 be
  the small numbers who are totally incompetent.  But it is not because the
  certs are merely paper.
 
  That's my 2 cents.
 
  Greg Macaulay, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
  Attorney/Law Professor (Retired)
  Lifetime member of AARP
  Oldest CCNP/CCDP in existence
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  The.Rock
  Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:33 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock
 
 
  oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
   you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
  prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned. Having
  the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say
 your
  8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean you
  certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-04-03 Thread Jim Newton

I would definitely have to disagree with "certs can help you get a job they
do not really educate you unless you are completely new to the networking
field." I think that if in the process of getting your cert, you read
something other that exam cram, there is a lot to learn. If you look at the
cert process as a chance to learn new things, rather than as a chance to
memorize a bunch of stuff, there is a lot to be learned.
Maybe you can recite by heart every intricacy of the routing protocols
covered in "Routing TCP/IP" by Doyle. Not just how to configure them, but
how they operate and how they make decisions, or all of the info on
switching contained in "LAN Switching" by Kennedy. But most people can't.
They may know quite a bit, but if you read both of those books from cover to
cover I am willing to bet that somewhere in them there will be at least one
new thing that you learn, or hadn't thought about before.
The process also let's some of us who don't work in an IBM environment learn
something about those protocols. Does this matter? Yes because the more you
understand about different protocols, the deeper you can understand how
yours work, and how to make them interoperatre.
So, if you approach the cert process as a chance to learn that one new
thing, rather that memorize what you need to pass a test, then it can
educate you. They can give you the incentive to read that one book that you
could never find the time to read before, or to try something new in your
lab, and figure out how it really works, rather that just how to configure
it.
You can only learn if you let yourself learn, but if you do then anything
can be a learning experience.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Stuart Laubstein
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:17 AM
To: 'B J'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

I disagree with the assesment of the CCNA being a hard test. I would say it
was much easier than any university exam I took with the possible exception
of Psych100. You also do not need many math skills to pass a CCNA-ok maybe
what hex and binary are etc but thats about it. Even BCRAN and BCMSN were
not all that hard. University gives you an education and while certs can
help you get a job they do not really educate you unless you are completely
new to the networking field. I do agree that with more and more books coming
on the market all certs will have more people completing them including
juniper and CCIE but that is what Cisco and Juniper want as they need
support people if they want to keep increasing sales.

stuart

-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: B J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 5:52 PM
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

  The CCNA is far harder than any test one will encounter with a major  in
Education, Anthropology, History, Business Management, etc.  Do you really
think the dumbest CCNA isn't more knowledgable in many areas, one being
math, than your daughters first grade teacher?
  Bottom line:  Remember this: As long as HR employees are hired because
they are great looking babes, they will have no clue on talent.  Certs give
them something tangible and simple that they can understand. Degrees do the
same.
  A couple more points:  I hear people say that certifications are expensive

you best study hard before paying.  They are not.  Take them 3 or 4 times
each, pay your $300 or $400 and enjoy your huge $5000+ raise and job
security.  Don't postpone it. People a class in Art Appreciation at a
"quality university" is going to run you $300 to $400 and is worthless by
their own admission.  You need the whole degree.
  ...and yes.  CCIE's will triple.  There were no books.  Now there are.
Books make tests easy.  That is what make Juniper's test so hard now.  You
can't read the 12 to 15 they have listed as easily as you can one Sybex book

that is designed around the exam.
   Finally, if you are very knowledgeable and dislike "paper certs". Please
put out a book that gets paper people up to par.  Something to read after
the exam and before your first interview.  I think it would be very helpful
to many, who have a desire but lack an entire network at home. Plus, if you
think people are gaining an edge on you because of certs.  You'll be
"Published".  That puts you in the upper-diety range.  You can live a
lifetime on that.




- Original Message -
From: "Scott Baron" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


Has anyone noticed that people arguing the most that certs dont matter are
the ones that haven't 'bothered' to get them.

I know that isn't true for everyone... so don't flame me but... see where
generalities get you!  How shortsited can you be to simply make a blanket
statement... ce

Allen May - Rich man 2 cents at a time (was Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply)

2001-04-03 Thread EA Louie

I think you're up to 2 bits now, Allen...2 more bits and you'll be up to a 
nibble.

;-)

At 08:04 AM 4/3/01, Allen May wrote:
Hey...isn't this the thread that went on for days a couple weeks ago and I
cashed in on all the 2 cents and the 2 bobs?  I'm gonna be rich!

[snip]



 
  That's my 2 cents.
 
  Greg Macaulay, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
  Attorney/Law Professor (Retired)
  Lifetime member of AARP
  Oldest CCNP/CCDP in existence
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  The.Rock
  Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:33 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock
 
 
  oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
   you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
  prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned. Having
  the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say
your
  8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean you
  certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-04-03 Thread Drew Simonis

B J wrote:
 
   The CCNA is far harder than any test one will encounter with a major  in
 Education, Anthropology, History, Business Management, etc.  Do you really
 think the dumbest CCNA isn't more knowledgable in many areas, one being
 math, than your daughters first grade teacher?

Why do so many people feel that comparing apples to oranges will 
strengthen their point?  Anthropology has nothing to do with 
networking, and knowlege of one has nothing to do with knowlege of 
the other.  And Its been a while, but I don't really remember any 
math problems on my CCNA test, unless you consider subnetting to
be a real mathmatical challenge.  

   Bottom line:  Remember this: As long as HR employees are hired because
 they are great looking babes, they will have no clue on talent.  Certs give
 them something tangible and simple that they can understand. Degrees do the
 same.

Oh, I see now.  You are a schmuck.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-04-03 Thread Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI

The CCNA is far harder than any test one will encounter with a major??? What
are you be smoking? You are wrong wrong wrong. A degree is far more valuable
than a vender specific certification. 



-Original Message-
From: B J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX 


  The CCNA is far harder than any test one will encounter with a major  in  
Education, Anthropology, History, Business Management, etc.  Do you really 
think the dumbest CCNA isn't more knowledgable in many areas, one being 
math, than your daughters first grade teacher?
  Bottom line:  Remember this: As long as HR employees are hired because 
they are great looking babes, they will have no clue on talent.  Certs give 
them something tangible and simple that they can understand. Degrees do the 
same.
  A couple more points:  I hear people say that certifications are expensive

you best study hard before paying.  They are not.  Take them 3 or 4 times 
each, pay your $300 or $400 and enjoy your huge $5000+ raise and job 
security.  Don't postpone it. People a class in Art Appreciation at a 
"quality university" is going to run you $300 to $400 and is worthless by 
their own admission.  You need the whole degree.
  ...and yes.  CCIE's will triple.  There were no books.  Now there are.  
Books make tests easy.  That is what make Juniper's test so hard now.  You 
can't read the 12 to 15 they have listed as easily as you can one Sybex book

that is designed around the exam.
   Finally, if you are very knowledgeable and dislike "paper certs". Please 
put out a book that gets paper people up to par.  Something to read after 
the exam and before your first interview.  I think it would be very helpful 
to many, who have a desire but lack an entire network at home. Plus, if you 
think people are gaining an edge on you because of certs.  You'll be 
"Published".  That puts you in the upper-diety range.  You can live a 
lifetime on that.




- Original Message -
From: "Scott Baron" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


Has anyone noticed that people arguing the most that certs dont matter are
the ones that haven't 'bothered' to get them.

I know that isn't true for everyone... so don't flame me but... see where
generalities get you!  How shortsited can you be to simply make a blanket
statement... certs don't prove anything... geez.

Scott M. Baron
CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA

-Original Message-
From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:30 AM
To: The.Rock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


"certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
subject
matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
more knowledgeable.

Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
(albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
willingness
to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but
I
assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
upon
that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
dangerous! smile

I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area,
but
they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for example,
may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard
on
the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and
passing
a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate
the
individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become an
expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes for
physicians, accountants, architects, etc.

I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an entry
ticket into this career.  Individuals who possess these certs should be
respected for the time, effort and interest they have shown in studying
for
and obtaining a cert.  But whether they are PAPER CERTS is truly a
mischaracterization.  As I put forth above, every academic or professional
degree is indeed initially a paper cert -- but with potential.  IT folks
who
obtain these certs by and large have the potential to succeed.  Just as
there ar

RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-04-03 Thread William E. Gragido

LOL.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Drew Simonis
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:05 PM
To: B J
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


B J wrote:

   The CCNA is far harder than any test one will encounter with a major  in
 Education, Anthropology, History, Business Management, etc.  Do you really
 think the dumbest CCNA isn't more knowledgable in many areas, one being
 math, than your daughters first grade teacher?

Why do so many people feel that comparing apples to oranges will
strengthen their point?  Anthropology has nothing to do with
networking, and knowlege of one has nothing to do with knowlege of
the other.  And Its been a while, but I don't really remember any
math problems on my CCNA test, unless you consider subnetting to
be a real mathmatical challenge.

   Bottom line:  Remember this: As long as HR employees are hired because
 they are great looking babes, they will have no clue on talent.  Certs
give
 them something tangible and simple that they can understand. Degrees do
the
 same.

Oh, I see now.  You are a schmuck.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-04-03 Thread William E. Gragido

Once again, it totally depends on the subject matter being studied.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:11 PM
To: 'B J'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


The CCNA is far harder than any test one will encounter with a major??? What
are you be smoking? You are wrong wrong wrong. A degree is far more valuable
than a vender specific certification.



-Original Message-
From: B J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


  The CCNA is far harder than any test one will encounter with a major  in
Education, Anthropology, History, Business Management, etc.  Do you really
think the dumbest CCNA isn't more knowledgable in many areas, one being
math, than your daughters first grade teacher?
  Bottom line:  Remember this: As long as HR employees are hired because
they are great looking babes, they will have no clue on talent.  Certs give
them something tangible and simple that they can understand. Degrees do the
same.
  A couple more points:  I hear people say that certifications are expensive

you best study hard before paying.  They are not.  Take them 3 or 4 times
each, pay your $300 or $400 and enjoy your huge $5000+ raise and job
security.  Don't postpone it. People a class in Art Appreciation at a
"quality university" is going to run you $300 to $400 and is worthless by
their own admission.  You need the whole degree.
  ...and yes.  CCIE's will triple.  There were no books.  Now there are.
Books make tests easy.  That is what make Juniper's test so hard now.  You
can't read the 12 to 15 they have listed as easily as you can one Sybex book

that is designed around the exam.
   Finally, if you are very knowledgeable and dislike "paper certs". Please
put out a book that gets paper people up to par.  Something to read after
the exam and before your first interview.  I think it would be very helpful
to many, who have a desire but lack an entire network at home. Plus, if you
think people are gaining an edge on you because of certs.  You'll be
"Published".  That puts you in the upper-diety range.  You can live a
lifetime on that.




- Original Message -
From: "Scott Baron" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


Has anyone noticed that people arguing the most that certs dont matter are
the ones that haven't 'bothered' to get them.

I know that isn't true for everyone... so don't flame me but... see where
generalities get you!  How shortsited can you be to simply make a blanket
statement... certs don't prove anything... geez.

Scott M. Baron
CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA

-Original Message-
From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:30 AM
To: The.Rock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


"certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
subject
matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
more knowledgeable.

Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
(albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
willingness
to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- but
I
assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
upon
that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
dangerous! smile

I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area,
but
they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for example,
may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard
on
the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and
passing
a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate
the
individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become an
expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes for
physicians, accountants, architects, etc.

I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an entry
ticket into this career.  Individuals who possess these certs should be
respected for the time, effort and interest they have shown in studying
for
and obtaining 

Re: Allen May - Rich man 2 cents at a time (was Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply)

2001-04-03 Thread Allen May

My nickname on boards (back in the BBS days) wasn't MegaBite for nothin' ;)

- Original Message -
From: "EA Louie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Allen May" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:03 PM
Subject: Allen May - Rich man 2 cents at a time (was Re: Cisco Certs
Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply)


 I think you're up to 2 bits now, Allen...2 more bits and you'll be up to a
 nibble.

 ;-)

 At 08:04 AM 4/3/01, Allen May wrote:
 Hey...isn't this the thread that went on for days a couple weeks ago and
I
 cashed in on all the 2 cents and the 2 bobs?  I'm gonna be rich!
 
 [snip]



  
   That's my 2 cents.
  
   Greg Macaulay, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE
   Attorney/Law Professor (Retired)
   Lifetime member of AARP
   Oldest CCNP/CCDP in existence
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
   The.Rock
   Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:33 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock
  
  
   oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove
anything
you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The
only
   prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned.
Having
   the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets
say
 your
   8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean
you
   certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-04-03 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

B J wrote:

The CCNA is far harder than any test one will encounter with a major  in
  Education, Anthropology, History, Business Management, etc.  Do you really
  think the dumbest CCNA isn't more knowledgable in many areas, one being
  math, than your daughters first grade teacher?

Why do so many people feel that comparing apples to oranges will
strengthen their point?  Anthropology has nothing to do with
networking, and knowlege of one has nothing to do with knowlege of
the other.

Personally, I've found anthropology to be incredibly useful in 
understanding the corporate environments in which I do networking. 
Indeed, I'm about to be running an internal seminar program at Nortel 
that draws a good deal, in its instructional design, to tribal 
rituals. "Come to me, grasshoppers, and learn the Secrets of the 
Inner BGP Circles that aren't in RFC 1771."

And Its been a while, but I don't really remember any
math problems on my CCNA test, unless you consider subnetting to
be a real mathmatical challenge.

At the CCNA level, no. At more and more advanced level, statistical, 
and indeed abstract algebra (as in error-correcting codes) becomes 
useful.  Any deep understanding of routing protocols will involve 
formalism in data structures, automata theory, etc.



Bottom line:  Remember this: As long as HR employees are hired because
  they are great looking babes, they will have no clue on talent.  Certs give
  them something tangible and simple that they can understand. Degrees do the
  same.

Oh, I see now.  You are a schmuck.

Hmmm...all too much of _my_ HR experience has been with Catbert clones.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX ENOUGH ALREADY!

2001-04-03 Thread Ray Smith

Okay here we go again with this thread .where does it end.  Enough 
already!!


From: Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'B J'" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:10:32 -0700

The CCNA is far harder than any test one will encounter with a major??? 
What
are you be smoking? You are wrong wrong wrong. A degree is far more 
valuable
than a vender specific certification.



-Original Message-
From: B J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


   The CCNA is far harder than any test one will encounter with a major  in
Education, Anthropology, History, Business Management, etc.  Do you really
think the dumbest CCNA isn't more knowledgable in many areas, one being
math, than your daughters first grade teacher?
   Bottom line:  Remember this: As long as HR employees are hired because
they are great looking babes, they will have no clue on talent.  Certs give
them something tangible and simple that they can understand. Degrees do the
same.
   A couple more points:  I hear people say that certifications are 
expensive

you best study hard before paying.  They are not.  Take them 3 or 4 times
each, pay your $300 or $400 and enjoy your huge $5000+ raise and job
security.  Don't postpone it. People a class in Art Appreciation at a
"quality university" is going to run you $300 to $400 and is worthless by
their own admission.  You need the whole degree.
   ...and yes.  CCIE's will triple.  There were no books.  Now there are.
Books make tests easy.  That is what make Juniper's test so hard now.  You
can't read the 12 to 15 they have listed as easily as you can one Sybex 
book

that is designed around the exam.
Finally, if you are very knowledgeable and dislike "paper certs". 
Please
put out a book that gets paper people up to par.  Something to read after
the exam and before your first interview.  I think it would be very helpful
to many, who have a desire but lack an entire network at home. Plus, if you
think people are gaining an edge on you because of certs.  You'll be
"Published".  That puts you in the upper-diety range.  You can live a
lifetime on that.




- Original Message -
From: "Scott Baron" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply


 Has anyone noticed that people arguing the most that certs dont matter 
are
 the ones that haven't 'bothered' to get them.
 
 I know that isn't true for everyone... so don't flame me but... see where
 generalities get you!  How shortsited can you be to simply make a blanket
 statement... certs don't prove anything... geez.
 
 Scott M. Baron
 CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:30 AM
 To: The.Rock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Senior Citizen Reply
 
 
 "certs don't prove anything" ??? I'm not sure that I can agree with that
 statement. Certs IMHO represent an interest by the individual in the
subject
 matter, and a determined effort to undertake studies necessary to become
 more knowledgeable.
 
 Certainly, obtaining a cert. does not make one a guru.  But it usually
 (albeit not all the time) indicates a person who has shown some
willingness
 to learn.  I view the knowledge I gained by studying for my certs as a
 foundation to be built upon over the coming years. Perhaps I have only a
 passing or introductory knowledge of some subjects at this juncture -- 
but
I
 assume -- and I certainly hope that as every year passes, I will build
upon
 that foundation knowledge and at some point I will undergo a slow, but
 steady metamorphosis into a guru of sorts!  But at this juncture with my
 certs, I would certainly agree that I have just enough knowledge to be
 dangerous! smile
 
 I would compare the cert study to obtaining academic and professional
 degrees.  Certainly upon graduation, grads are not experts in any area,
but
 they possess the fundamentals upon which to build.  A lawyer, for 
example,
 may indeed represent any survivors of a plane crash is his/her back yard
on
 the day he/she is admitted to the Bar, but law school graduation and
passing
 a Bar Examination DOES NOT indicate an expertise -- but it does indicate
the
 individual has the foundational knowledge and the potential to become an
 expert at some point in the future.  I would submit that the same goes 
for
 physicians, accountants, architects, etc.
 
 I think that the real problem is how these certs. have been marketed.
 Instead of promising IMMEDIATE big bucks, the certs, should be an entry
 ticket into this career.  Individuals who possess these certs should be

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-20 Thread Circusnuts

Hello Hello- I have two of them who sit behind me @ work...  Paper Lab guys-
it's the newest craze.  They only knew exactly what they were asked on the
lab scenario (passed the first time).  Generally- I believe you are right,
but I do have these 2 fellows out of the 4 CCIE's that do not have what it
takes to work in an Enterprise network.  One of them is leaving because he
is about to be let go.  We call him Mr. Debug, the RSP melter (long story).

But you are- for the most part very correct in your assumption
Phil

- Original Message -
From: "Chris Haller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


 I too am pursuing CCIE certification and have noticed
 a recent influx in people attempting and passing CCNP
 and CCIE written, especially the recent addition of
 hundreds of people on this board ...

 Anyway, CCNA, CCNP, CCDP ... CCIE Written, this means
 nothing.  It is good, takes a good amoumt of work and
 is somewhat difficult to achieve, but if that's your
 issue, only interview LAB CERTIFIED CCIE's.  There is
 no such thing as a "Paper LAB CCIE"  If you pass the
 lab, you know your stuff .. WELL.

 HTH





 --- Adele Galus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Mike;
 
  I find your comment very interesting, most positions
  state how
  many years of experience before applying. The only
  exceptions
  that I have seen with certification positions, is in
  the programing field.
  It's not the certification being a problem - it's
  the resources for
  people to obtain experience.
 
  My thoughts are that there needs to be more labs for
  people to work in when
  studying for their certification that are affordable
  or that it can be obtain.
  People need to be involved with study groups and
  they should do volunteer
  work or try working as a contractor.
 
  This problem became obvious when Cisco  Microsoft
  started programs in
  San Jose for the welfare people to start becoming
  certified. Why did they do
  that
 
  What amazes me is how these people, that you are
  seeing, have passed the test
 
  my 03 cents worth.
 
  respectfully,
  adele
 
  Mike Davis wrote:
 
   I will probably get yelled at for this one but...
  
   I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the
  CCIE.
   So up front I am not against certs.
  
   I am becoming aware of more and more people
  becoming
   Cisco certified and not know enough to go and
  actually
   do the work. Our company has and is interviewing
  for
   network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
   these people to verify technical experience. I
  have
   had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks
  who
   could not tell me what they 'should' acutally
  know.
  
   This scares me because I am also working hard
  toward
   my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and
  is
   showing up more that these people are becoming
  "paper"
   Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.
  
   I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain
  as
   difficult if not more so in the future. I for one
  do
   not want to spend a year of my life gaining the
  CCIE
   title to be one among thousands who also have it.
  
   That is my insite and hope Cisco will
   try to make it more difficult to obtain the
  CCNP/DP
   and not become another MCSE program.
  
   __
   Do You Yahoo!?
   Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
   http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
  
   _
   FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
   Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 =
 Chris from Chicago
 MasterCNE, 5.x CNE, ICNE, 4.x CNE, CCNA, MCP

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-20 Thread Robert Padjen

I believe that there are two distinctions that should
be made - and that you may disagree with. At least for
the bachelors degree, the experience is just that -
well beyond the actual academics. In addition, the
focus of the GE portion of the program is to diversify
- humanities, science, language, amongst others. This
is one of the limitations to the Cisco (and other)
certifications as the certifications present a myopic
view.

The second distinction is that I would contend neither
represents more than the sum of its components, and
that value is perceived. For example, if I graduated
Stanford with a 2.1 GPA, as opposed to San Diego State
with a 4.0, which school would be a better hire? Few
resumes I see have the GPA, and, regardless, a lot of
folks use the name...


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This issue is turning thisgs upside down from point
 of view. 
 
 I would like to tell you my opinion. If CCNA, NP,
 DA, DP and IE written
 are not worth then your Bachelors and Graduate
 studies worth the same. Just
 papers.
 
 I learn to configure a cisco router before knowing
 all the cisco stuff.
 I have a CCDA, CCNP and going for the complete set
 CCDA, CCNP and CCIE complete.
 
 I knew frame relay,atm, sna, dlsw, sdlc, ppp, ipx,
 switching, etc before
 taking any cisco course. I took all cisco traning
 path version 11.2 and
 just recently obtain my degrees and working for the
 big one. 
 
 What will be your opinion Do I know something or I
 am just papers?
 
 You sould be carefull on your opinion about this
 things, all the knowledge
 since a long time ago has been paper, No one has
 achieve glory after years
 of practice and experience. 
 
 I was thinking that you are trying to do the same
 that the shareowners are
 doing with the internet economy, you are devaluating
 the value of the Certifications,
 why don't you do the same with the college and and
 graduate degrees, they
 are very similar just studying and passing examns
 not real life thing until
 you pass all the levels (semesters and big exam
 thesis).
 
 Giga Internetworking
 
 Fer Saldana
 
 
 
 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


=
Robert Padjen

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-20 Thread Donald B Johnson Jr
d switching network in a very short amount of time using very
limiting
   rules.  If you succesfully complete the task, you then get to leave
while
   someone "breaks your network in any untold number of ways"  you are
then
   told to fix it once again in a very limited time frame.
  
   If you can accomplish this, then you become a CCIE.  I think the CCIE
   certification proves a lot.  It proves you have the knowledge, the
ability
   and the troubleshooting skills. It also shows you can work under
pressure
  to
   accomplish a goal in a limited time.
  
   But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong grin
  
   Louie Belt
   CCIE #7054
  
   -Original Message-
   From: The.Rock
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: 3/19/01 11:32 AM
   Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock
  
   oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove
anything
you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The
only
   prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned.
   Having
   the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets
say
   your
   8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean
   you
   know how to work on a car if someone said fix it? probably not. And
   there's
   my point. You have the tools, but do you really know how to use them,
   most
   newbys don't, although they have a clue ( or at least some do) they
are
   unsure. If you truly are experienced in every sense of the word, yes I
   believe that alone, can prove your qualification. I'll take a guy with
   "experience" anyday over someone who is certified and little
experience.
   Your the victim??? Of what ?? I didn't do it, nobody did anything to
   you,
   you make your own desicions, live with them. You must be a newbie
cause
   you
   certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
  
   _
   FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
   Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-20 Thread Tony van Ree

Hi,

My two bobs worth,

Any qualification is as good as the paper it is written on.  In my experience someone 
with an open mind, willing to learn, has acquired knowledge, shares knowledge and 
works smart in an effort to acheive excellence is what really counts.

The paper does indicate the person has at least seen the words and knows the lingo, 
probably the acromymns and often has some understanding.  I have seen many a good 
technical person, well qualified, knowledgable and understanding come copletely 
unglued when put in a situation the person was not familiar with.  The mark of the 
real expert is 'the real expert will seek, ask and find' the details.  He knows how to 
extract the details.  Paper qualifications particularly at a degree level indicates 
the person can usually do this.

I understand the pride of having a bunch of letters after your name.  Personally I 
don't use them although I do have a copy of some of the certs I have gained on my 
wall.  These are for my pride not to show others.

I have lost the pride in my qualifications because some have them and do not share, 
care or attempt to understand.

Teunis,
Hobart, Tasmania
Australia

PS.  I did think it strange when I read something by a Dr. Icant Remember the name 
CCIE.
On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 08:01:23 AM, Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI wrote:

 Bravo!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 4:22 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
 
 This issue is turning thisgs upside down from point of view. 
 
 I would like to tell you my opinion. If CCNA, NP, DA, DP and IE written
 are not worth then your Bachelors and Graduate studies worth the same. Just
 papers.
 
 I learn to configure a cisco router before knowing all the cisco stuff.
 I have a CCDA, CCNP and going for the complete set CCDA, CCNP and CCIE
 complete.
 
 I knew frame relay,atm, sna, dlsw, sdlc, ppp, ipx, switching, etc before
 taking any cisco course. I took all cisco traning path version 11.2 and
 just recently obtain my degrees and working for the big one. 
 
 What will be your opinion Do I know something or I am just papers?
 
 You sould be carefull on your opinion about this things, all the knowledge
 since a long time ago has been paper, No one has achieve glory after years
 of practice and experience. 
 
 I was thinking that you are trying to do the same that the shareowners are
 doing with the internet economy, you are devaluating the value of the
 Certifications,
 why don't you do the same with the college and and graduate degrees, they
 are very similar just studying and passing examns not real life thing until
 you pass all the levels (semesters and big exam thesis).
 
 Giga Internetworking
 
 Fer Saldana
 
 
 
 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
www.tasmail.com


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bobs?? Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-20 Thread Allen May

Do banks take bobs here in the states?  I'm scraping up all the 2 cents
worth right now but haven't come across these yet.  I can't get the online
currency converters to tell me what these are worth ;)


- Original Message -
From: "Tony van Ree" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI" [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


 Hi,

 My two bobs worth,

 Any qualification is as good as the paper it is written on.  In my
experience someone with an open mind, willing to learn, has acquired
knowledge, shares knowledge and works smart in an effort to acheive
excellence is what really counts.

 The paper does indicate the person has at least seen the words and knows
the lingo, probably the acromymns and often has some understanding.  I have
seen many a good technical person, well qualified, knowledgable and
understanding come copletely unglued when put in a situation the person was
not familiar with.  The mark of the real expert is 'the real expert will
seek, ask and find' the details.  He knows how to extract the details.
Paper qualifications particularly at a degree level indicates the person can
usually do this.

 I understand the pride of having a bunch of letters after your name.
Personally I don't use them although I do have a copy of some of the certs I
have gained on my wall.  These are for my pride not to show others.

 I have lost the pride in my qualifications because some have them and do
not share, care or attempt to understand.

 Teunis,
 Hobart, Tasmania
 Australia

 PS.  I did think it strange when I read something by a Dr. Icant Remember
the name CCIE.
 On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 08:01:23 AM, Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI
wrote:

  Bravo!
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 4:22 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
 
  This issue is turning thisgs upside down from point of view.
 
  I would like to tell you my opinion. If CCNA, NP, DA, DP and IE written
  are not worth then your Bachelors and Graduate studies worth the same.
Just
  papers.
 
  I learn to configure a cisco router before knowing all the cisco stuff.
  I have a CCDA, CCNP and going for the complete set CCDA, CCNP and CCIE
  complete.
 
  I knew frame relay,atm, sna, dlsw, sdlc, ppp, ipx, switching, etc before
  taking any cisco course. I took all cisco traning path version 11.2 and
  just recently obtain my degrees and working for the big one.
 
  What will be your opinion Do I know something or I am just papers?
 
  You sould be carefull on your opinion about this things, all the
knowledge
  since a long time ago has been paper, No one has achieve glory after
years
  of practice and experience.
 
  I was thinking that you are trying to do the same that the shareowners
are
  doing with the internet economy, you are devaluating the value of the
  Certifications,
  why don't you do the same with the college and and graduate degrees,
they
  are very similar just studying and passing examns not real life thing
until
  you pass all the levels (semesters and big exam thesis).
 
  Giga Internetworking
 
  Fer Saldana
 
 
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


 --
 www.tasmail.com


 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-20 Thread Brad Shifflett

My thought is if you can get all the way through the CCIE Lab and all, you
are determined to do the job. How many CCIE's are out there? 8000+-? I would
say from the low numbers, this exam is not easy, I have been in the field
for 7 years and just started to get my Cisco certification. I feel if I
would have started the Cisco stuff years ago, I would have not made it. The
material now is still pretty difficult to understand on some days. But, I
think the difference is, I am trying to understand it and learn it, not just
get by. I want to know the stuff inside and out. I am far from that, I know
alot of people that can take the exam, cram all week, and pass. But when it
comes to real world experience, it is over for them. Lets just weed out the
bad and let them fall on there faces. I like to help people, but if I know
this person is only a paper CXXX then I am not going to help them, it is up
to us real engineers to put these paper guys in there place, let them fall
down and you come up behind them and clean up the mess and save the day!
Happy testing!


Brad Shifflett 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Micromenders, Inc. 



-Original Message-
From: Tony van Ree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


Hi,

My two bobs worth,

Any qualification is as good as the paper it is written on.  In my
experience someone with an open mind, willing to learn, has acquired
knowledge, shares knowledge and works smart in an effort to acheive
excellence is what really counts.

The paper does indicate the person has at least seen the words and knows the
lingo, probably the acromymns and often has some understanding.  I have seen
many a good technical person, well qualified, knowledgable and understanding
come copletely unglued when put in a situation the person was not familiar
with.  The mark of the real expert is 'the real expert will seek, ask and
find' the details.  He knows how to extract the details.  Paper
qualifications particularly at a degree level indicates the person can
usually do this.

I understand the pride of having a bunch of letters after your name.
Personally I don't use them although I do have a copy of some of the certs I
have gained on my wall.  These are for my pride not to show others.

I have lost the pride in my qualifications because some have them and do not
share, care or attempt to understand.

Teunis,
Hobart, Tasmania
Australia

PS.  I did think it strange when I read something by a Dr. Icant Remember
the name CCIE.
On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 08:01:23 AM, Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI wrote:

 Bravo!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 4:22 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
 
 This issue is turning thisgs upside down from point of view. 
 
 I would like to tell you my opinion. If CCNA, NP, DA, DP and IE written
 are not worth then your Bachelors and Graduate studies worth the same.
Just
 papers.
 
 I learn to configure a cisco router before knowing all the cisco stuff.
 I have a CCDA, CCNP and going for the complete set CCDA, CCNP and CCIE
 complete.
 
 I knew frame relay,atm, sna, dlsw, sdlc, ppp, ipx, switching, etc before
 taking any cisco course. I took all cisco traning path version 11.2 and
 just recently obtain my degrees and working for the big one. 
 
 What will be your opinion Do I know something or I am just papers?
 
 You sould be carefull on your opinion about this things, all the knowledge
 since a long time ago has been paper, No one has achieve glory after years
 of practice and experience. 
 
 I was thinking that you are trying to do the same that the shareowners are
 doing with the internet economy, you are devaluating the value of the
 Certifications,
 why don't you do the same with the college and and graduate degrees, they
 are very similar just studying and passing examns not real life thing
until
 you pass all the levels (semesters and big exam thesis).
 
 Giga Internetworking
 
 Fer Saldana
 
 
 
 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
www.tasmail.com


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-20 Thread Louie Belt

Actually, you are way too high on your estimate of CCIE's.  As of February
28th 2001 there are 5432 worldwide, 2476 are in the US.  A large number of
those work directly for Cisco.

The certification has been around since 1994 and the first CCIE was #1024

The CCIE World population can be viewed at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html


Louie


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brad Shifflett
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


My thought is if you can get all the way through the CCIE Lab and all, you
are determined to do the job. How many CCIE's are out there? 8000+-? I would
say from the low numbers, this exam is not easy, I have been in the field
for 7 years and just started to get my Cisco certification. I feel if I
would have started the Cisco stuff years ago, I would have not made it. The
material now is still pretty difficult to understand on some days. But, I
think the difference is, I am trying to understand it and learn it, not just
get by. I want to know the stuff inside and out. I am far from that, I know
alot of people that can take the exam, cram all week, and pass. But when it
comes to real world experience, it is over for them. Lets just weed out the
bad and let them fall on there faces. I like to help people, but if I know
this person is only a paper CXXX then I am not going to help them, it is up
to us real engineers to put these paper guys in there place, let them fall
down and you come up behind them and clean up the mess and save the day!
Happy testing!


Brad Shifflett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Micromenders, Inc.



-Original Message-
From: Tony van Ree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


Hi,

My two bobs worth,

Any qualification is as good as the paper it is written on.  In my
experience someone with an open mind, willing to learn, has acquired
knowledge, shares knowledge and works smart in an effort to acheive
excellence is what really counts.

The paper does indicate the person has at least seen the words and knows the
lingo, probably the acromymns and often has some understanding.  I have seen
many a good technical person, well qualified, knowledgable and understanding
come copletely unglued when put in a situation the person was not familiar
with.  The mark of the real expert is 'the real expert will seek, ask and
find' the details.  He knows how to extract the details.  Paper
qualifications particularly at a degree level indicates the person can
usually do this.

I understand the pride of having a bunch of letters after your name.
Personally I don't use them although I do have a copy of some of the certs I
have gained on my wall.  These are for my pride not to show others.

I have lost the pride in my qualifications because some have them and do not
share, care or attempt to understand.

Teunis,
Hobart, Tasmania
Australia

PS.  I did think it strange when I read something by a Dr. Icant Remember
the name CCIE.
On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 08:01:23 AM, Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI wrote:

 Bravo!

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 4:22 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

 This issue is turning thisgs upside down from point of view.

 I would like to tell you my opinion. If CCNA, NP, DA, DP and IE written
 are not worth then your Bachelors and Graduate studies worth the same.
Just
 papers.

 I learn to configure a cisco router before knowing all the cisco stuff.
 I have a CCDA, CCNP and going for the complete set CCDA, CCNP and CCIE
 complete.

 I knew frame relay,atm, sna, dlsw, sdlc, ppp, ipx, switching, etc before
 taking any cisco course. I took all cisco traning path version 11.2 and
 just recently obtain my degrees and working for the big one.

 What will be your opinion Do I know something or I am just papers?

 You sould be carefull on your opinion about this things, all the knowledge
 since a long time ago has been paper, No one has achieve glory after years
 of practice and experience.

 I was thinking that you are trying to do the same that the shareowners are
 doing with the internet economy, you are devaluating the value of the
 Certifications,
 why don't you do the same with the college and and graduate degrees, they
 are very similar just studying and passing examns not real life thing
until
 you pass all the levels (semesters and big exam thesis).

 Giga Internetworking

 Fer Saldana



 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-20 Thread Mark Mahoney



Circusnuts wrote:
 
 [snip]
 is about to be let go.  We call him Mr. Debug, the RSP melter (long story).

Jeesh!
How'd he melt the RSP? 
Thats gotta be a story worth tellin'!
;~)

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-20 Thread Brad Shifflett

Then that is even better. The less there are, the more prestigous the
certification I think it is. I would say some that do pass probably are just
naturally able to do the work with no problem, some are just book smart and
have great memorization skills, but doesn't this really require a deep
knowledge to pass beyond what alot of us can even comprehend right now? I
just started looking at this myself. We just got one guy at our company
passed the lab and one pther passed the written. I can say these 2 are very
smart and bright individuals.

Brad Shifflett

-Original Message-
From: Louie Belt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:57 PM
To: Brad Shifflett; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


Actually, you are way too high on your estimate of CCIE's.  As of February
28th 2001 there are 5432 worldwide, 2476 are in the US.  A large number of
those work directly for Cisco.

The certification has been around since 1994 and the first CCIE was #1024

The CCIE World population can be viewed at:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html


Louie


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brad Shifflett
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


My thought is if you can get all the way through the CCIE Lab and all, you
are determined to do the job. How many CCIE's are out there? 8000+-? I would
say from the low numbers, this exam is not easy, I have been in the field
for 7 years and just started to get my Cisco certification. I feel if I
would have started the Cisco stuff years ago, I would have not made it. The
material now is still pretty difficult to understand on some days. But, I
think the difference is, I am trying to understand it and learn it, not just
get by. I want to know the stuff inside and out. I am far from that, I know
alot of people that can take the exam, cram all week, and pass. But when it
comes to real world experience, it is over for them. Lets just weed out the
bad and let them fall on there faces. I like to help people, but if I know
this person is only a paper CXXX then I am not going to help them, it is up
to us real engineers to put these paper guys in there place, let them fall
down and you come up behind them and clean up the mess and save the day!
Happy testing!


Brad Shifflett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Micromenders, Inc.



-Original Message-
From: Tony van Ree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


Hi,

My two bobs worth,

Any qualification is as good as the paper it is written on.  In my
experience someone with an open mind, willing to learn, has acquired
knowledge, shares knowledge and works smart in an effort to acheive
excellence is what really counts.

The paper does indicate the person has at least seen the words and knows the
lingo, probably the acromymns and often has some understanding.  I have seen
many a good technical person, well qualified, knowledgable and understanding
come copletely unglued when put in a situation the person was not familiar
with.  The mark of the real expert is 'the real expert will seek, ask and
find' the details.  He knows how to extract the details.  Paper
qualifications particularly at a degree level indicates the person can
usually do this.

I understand the pride of having a bunch of letters after your name.
Personally I don't use them although I do have a copy of some of the certs I
have gained on my wall.  These are for my pride not to show others.

I have lost the pride in my qualifications because some have them and do not
share, care or attempt to understand.

Teunis,
Hobart, Tasmania
Australia

PS.  I did think it strange when I read something by a Dr. Icant Remember
the name CCIE.
On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 08:01:23 AM, Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI wrote:

 Bravo!

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 4:22 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

 This issue is turning thisgs upside down from point of view.

 I would like to tell you my opinion. If CCNA, NP, DA, DP and IE written
 are not worth then your Bachelors and Graduate studies worth the same.
Just
 papers.

 I learn to configure a cisco router before knowing all the cisco stuff.
 I have a CCDA, CCNP and going for the complete set CCDA, CCNP and CCIE
 complete.

 I knew frame relay,atm, sna, dlsw, sdlc, ppp, ipx, switching, etc before
 taking any cisco course. I took all cisco traning path version 11.2 and
 just recently obtain my degrees and working for the big one.

 What will be your opinion Do I know something or I am just papers?

 You sould

RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

2001-03-19 Thread Wilfredo M. Ruelos


You sounded like some newbies has stole your job. Do you have something against up and 
coming people who just want to learn about Cisco and consequently be certified for it. 
 I do not belong to this group of guys for i have been on this business for 12 years 
but i'm not insecure if too  many of them are coming up.  Did'nt you said that 
experience alone can prove your qualification.  Then why you cannot prove it on some 
exam which you pointed out as unimportant and to easy for you.  
The guy did not called me an idiot, you do! so if you really want to talk about it i 
have included my address and telephone number so we can discuss it without cluterring 
this list.
And oh yeah. I've been a victim of guys like you twelve years ago.  I cannot make 
myself part of it now.
Wilfredo M. Ruelos
Network Engineer 
Riyad Bank -Riyadh Data Center
Tel +966-1-472-2750 ext 299

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-19 Thread Chris Haller

I too am pursuing CCIE certification and have noticed
a recent influx in people attempting and passing CCNP
and CCIE written, especially the recent addition of
hundreds of people on this board ...

Anyway, CCNA, CCNP, CCDP ... CCIE Written, this means
nothing.  It is good, takes a good amoumt of work and
is somewhat difficult to achieve, but if that's your
issue, only interview LAB CERTIFIED CCIE's.  There is
no such thing as a "Paper LAB CCIE"  If you pass the
lab, you know your stuff .. WELL.

HTH





--- Adele Galus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Mike;
 
 I find your comment very interesting, most positions
 state how
 many years of experience before applying. The only
 exceptions
 that I have seen with certification positions, is in
 the programing field.
 It's not the certification being a problem - it's
 the resources for
 people to obtain experience.
 
 My thoughts are that there needs to be more labs for
 people to work in when
 studying for their certification that are affordable
 or that it can be obtain.
 People need to be involved with study groups and
 they should do volunteer
 work or try working as a contractor.
 
 This problem became obvious when Cisco  Microsoft
 started programs in
 San Jose for the welfare people to start becoming
 certified. Why did they do
 that
 
 What amazes me is how these people, that you are
 seeing, have passed the test
 
 my 03 cents worth.
 
 respectfully,
 adele
 
 Mike Davis wrote:
 
  I will probably get yelled at for this one but...
 
  I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the
 CCIE.
  So up front I am not against certs.
 
  I am becoming aware of more and more people
 becoming
  Cisco certified and not know enough to go and
 actually
  do the work. Our company has and is interviewing
 for
  network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
  these people to verify technical experience. I
 have
  had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks
 who
  could not tell me what they 'should' acutally
 know.
 
  This scares me because I am also working hard
 toward
  my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and
 is
  showing up more that these people are becoming
 "paper"
  Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.
 
  I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain
 as
  difficult if not more so in the future. I for one
 do
  not want to spend a year of my life gaining the
 CCIE
  title to be one among thousands who also have it.
 
  That is my insite and hope Cisco will
  try to make it more difficult to obtain the
 CCNP/DP
  and not become another MCSE program.
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


=
Chris from Chicago
MasterCNE, 5.x CNE, ICNE, 4.x CNE, CCNA, MCP

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

2001-03-19 Thread The.Rock

My point was that more often then not, certified people aren't what they
seem. I like the fact that people want to learn more, because it keeps
"everyone" on their toes and learning about new technology. Part of the
problem is the industry's lack of insight into these so called certs. They
have put too much faith in them and its really the experienced guys who have
to take time out to teach newbies. No, no newbies stole my job, I welcome
the challenge tho, I doubt they could do it as effective as I do today. I'm
not saying they can't do it, but I can do it better and faster, and downtime
is
$$. Prove it on an exam ? I will in about 2 weeks. Certification is a
formality for those that have been in the industry for a while, for others
it is their foot in the door. I truly believe that there are a couple out of
a hundred that are new to the industry and truly understand concepts and
what they are doing. Its unfortunate that its the other 96 or so people that
give the certs a bad rap. And yes some are idiots, not most, not all, i said
some. I believe that certs show a level of understanding ( don't get that
confused with KNOWLEDGE). Knowledge implies some sort  of experience that
most don't have. I would be glad to call you, but I don;t have the time, and
its long distance...



""Wilfredo M. Ruelos"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
01C0B076.7D826160@COMMS1">news:01C0B076.7D826160@COMMS1...

 You sounded like some newbies has stole your job. Do you have something
against up and coming people who just want to learn about Cisco and
consequently be certified for it.  I do not belong to this group of guys for
i have been on this business for 12 years but i'm not insecure if too  many
of them are coming up.  Did'nt you said that experience alone can prove your
qualification.  Then why you cannot prove it on some exam which you pointed
out as unimportant and to easy for you.
 The guy did not called me an idiot, you do! so if you really want to talk
about it i have included my address and telephone number so we can discuss
it without cluterring this list.
 And oh yeah. I've been a victim of guys like you twelve years ago.  I
cannot make myself part of it now.
 Wilfredo M. Ruelos
 Network Engineer
 Riyad Bank -Riyadh Data Center
 Tel +966-1-472-2750 ext 299

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

2001-03-19 Thread The.Rock

oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
 you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned. Having
the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say your
8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean you
know how to work on a car if someone said fix it? probably not. And there's
my point. You have the tools, but do you really know how to use them, most
newbys don't, although they have a clue ( or at least some do) they are
unsure. If you truly are experienced in every sense of the word, yes I
believe that alone, can prove your qualification. I'll take a guy with
"experience" anyday over someone who is certified and little experience.
Your the victim??? Of what ?? I didn't do it, nobody did anything to you,
you make your own desicions, live with them. You must be a newbie cause you
certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".

""Wilfredo M. Ruelos"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
01C0B076.7D826160@COMMS1">news:01C0B076.7D826160@COMMS1...

 You sounded like some newbies has stole your job. Do you have something
against up and coming people who just want to learn about Cisco and
consequently be certified for it.  I do not belong to this group of guys for
i have been on this business for 12 years but i'm not insecure if too  many
of them are coming up.  Did'nt you said that experience alone can prove your
qualification.  Then why you cannot prove it on some exam which you pointed
out as unimportant and to easy for you.
 The guy did not called me an idiot, you do! so if you really want to talk
about it i have included my address and telephone number so we can discuss
it without cluterring this list.
 And oh yeah. I've been a victim of guys like you twelve years ago.  I
cannot make myself part of it now.
 Wilfredo M. Ruelos
 Network Engineer
 Riyad Bank -Riyadh Data Center
 Tel +966-1-472-2750 ext 299

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

2001-03-19 Thread Christopher Kolp

You sound very insecure about your knowledge and your job security.

Why must you bash newbies? Are you scared of them? Do they threaten
your job? I'd take a newbie with an open mind over a jerk who thinks
they know the world anyday. Sure you know it now. But you'll spend
ALL of your time "fending off evil newbies" and then loose whatever
edge you think you have.



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 The.Rock
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:33 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock
 
 
 oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't 
 prove anything
  you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " 
 something). The only
 prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly 
 learned. Having
 the know how, and knowing how to use are two different 
 things. Lets say your
 8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does 
 that mean you
 know how to work on a car if someone said fix it? probably 
 not. And there's
 my point. You have the tools, but do you really know how to 
 use them, most
 newbys don't, although they have a clue ( or at least some 
 do) they are
 unsure. If you truly are experienced in every sense of the word, yes I
 believe that alone, can prove your qualification. I'll take a guy with
 "experience" anyday over someone who is certified and little 
 experience.
 Your the victim??? Of what ?? I didn't do it, nobody did 
 anything to you,
 you make your own desicions, live with them. You must be a 
 newbie cause you
 certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
 
 ""Wilfredo M. Ruelos"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
 01C0B076.7D826160@COMMS1">news:01C0B076.7D826160@COMMS1...
 
  You sounded like some newbies has stole your job. Do you 
 have something
 against up and coming people who just want to learn about Cisco and
 consequently be certified for it.  I do not belong to this 
 group of guys for
 i have been on this business for 12 years but i'm not 
 insecure if too  many
 of them are coming up.  Did'nt you said that experience alone 
 can prove your
 qualification.  Then why you cannot prove it on some exam 
 which you pointed
 out as unimportant and to easy for you.
  The guy did not called me an idiot, you do! so if you 
 really want to talk
 about it i have included my address and telephone number so 
 we can discuss
 it without cluterring this list.
  And oh yeah. I've been a victim of guys like you twelve 
 years ago.  I
 cannot make myself part of it now.
  Wilfredo M. Ruelos
  Network Engineer
  Riyad Bank -Riyadh Data Center
  Tel +966-1-472-2750 ext 299
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

2001-03-19 Thread Belt, Louie

If I gave you all of the manuals and engineering specs on a car and told you
to study them and then tested you on every detail in those books and you
were able to pass the test would that prove anything?

If I then  gave you all of the tools and all of the parts to a car and said
"build it" and you successfully built it, and I then sent you away and I
broke the car (in several ways) and told you to come back and fix it and you
were able to fix it would this prove anything? 

Obviously it would prove a lot.  This is what the CCIE certfication is like.
You must study all of the networking manuals and know every detail and pass
a difficult exam to prove your knowledge. Then you are given all of the
tools and equipment you need and you must build an extremely complex routing
and switching network in a very short amount of time using very limiting
rules.  If you succesfully complete the task, you then get to leave while
someone "breaks your network in any untold number of ways"  you are then
told to fix it once again in a very limited time frame.

If you can accomplish this, then you become a CCIE.  I think the CCIE
certification proves a lot.  It proves you have the knowledge, the ability
and the troubleshooting skills. It also shows you can work under pressure to
accomplish a goal in a limited time.

But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong grin

Louie Belt
CCIE #7054

-Original Message-
From: The.Rock
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/19/01 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
 you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned.
Having
the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say
your
8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean
you
know how to work on a car if someone said fix it? probably not. And
there's
my point. You have the tools, but do you really know how to use them,
most
newbys don't, although they have a clue ( or at least some do) they are
unsure. If you truly are experienced in every sense of the word, yes I
believe that alone, can prove your qualification. I'll take a guy with
"experience" anyday over someone who is certified and little experience.
Your the victim??? Of what ?? I didn't do it, nobody did anything to
you,
you make your own desicions, live with them. You must be a newbie cause
you
certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

2001-03-19 Thread The.Rock

No im just overworked, like anyone else in the IT industry Hey I agree
with ya. I'm actually pretty down to earth. I'm just sick of people saying
how being certified is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I'm not a jerk
and very reasonable. If the opportunity affords itself, I'll take a new
person in and train them instead an person who thinks they know everything.
I'll be the first to admit that I by no means am greater than anyone. And if
for one mintue you think you have an edge, you already have fallen behind,
because someone will always be better. I know what I know now, only due to
experience and research

""Christopher Kolp"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
001901c0b0b0$2399d270$8be0acc6@ck2kadvanced">news:001901c0b0b0$2399d270$8be0acc6@ck2kadvanced...
 You sound very insecure about your knowledge and your job security.

 Why must you bash newbies? Are you scared of them? Do they threaten
 your job? I'd take a newbie with an open mind over a jerk who thinks
 they know the world anyday. Sure you know it now. But you'll spend
 ALL of your time "fending off evil newbies" and then loose whatever
 edge you think you have.



  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  The.Rock
  Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:33 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock
 
 
  oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't
  prove anything
   you really are an idiot if you think they "prove "
  something). The only
  prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly
  learned. Having
  the know how, and knowing how to use are two different
  things. Lets say your
  8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does
  that mean you
  know how to work on a car if someone said fix it? probably
  not. And there's
  my point. You have the tools, but do you really know how to
  use them, most
  newbys don't, although they have a clue ( or at least some
  do) they are
  unsure. If you truly are experienced in every sense of the word, yes I
  believe that alone, can prove your qualification. I'll take a guy with
  "experience" anyday over someone who is certified and little
  experience.
  Your the victim??? Of what ?? I didn't do it, nobody did
  anything to you,
  you make your own desicions, live with them. You must be a
  newbie cause you
  certainly can't handle responsibility if your a "victim".
 
  ""Wilfredo M. Ruelos"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
  01C0B076.7D826160@COMMS1">news:01C0B076.7D826160@COMMS1...
  
   You sounded like some newbies has stole your job. Do you
  have something
  against up and coming people who just want to learn about Cisco and
  consequently be certified for it.  I do not belong to this
  group of guys for
  i have been on this business for 12 years but i'm not
  insecure if too  many
  of them are coming up.  Did'nt you said that experience alone
  can prove your
  qualification.  Then why you cannot prove it on some exam
  which you pointed
  out as unimportant and to easy for you.
   The guy did not called me an idiot, you do! so if you
  really want to talk
  about it i have included my address and telephone number so
  we can discuss
  it without cluterring this list.
   And oh yeah. I've been a victim of guys like you twelve
  years ago.  I
  cannot make myself part of it now.
   Wilfredo M. Ruelos
   Network Engineer
   Riyad Bank -Riyadh Data Center
   Tel +966-1-472-2750 ext 299
  
   _
   FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
   Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

2001-03-19 Thread Brandon Rose

Everyone was a newbie once... as far as I know nobody was born with a
Catalyst 6509 as an extra appendage (wow, would that be a painful birth!).

I have issues with people who claim they're something it's obvious to any of
their peers they're not, but experience by its very definition takes time.

Is it just me or out of every mailing list I've ever been on this one seems
the most prone to pseudo flame wars?  I thought the great thing about the IT
universe was you don't have to claw people out of your way to make it to the
top of the game, it was instead about your own knowledge, ability, and
experience.

My $.02, but I can only read these "discussions" so often before I have to
say something...

Brandon


 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Kolp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 3:07 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock
 
 
 You sound very insecure about your knowledge and your job security.
 
 Why must you bash newbies? Are you scared of them? Do they threaten
 your job? I'd take a newbie with an open mind over a jerk who thinks
 they know the world anyday. Sure you know it now. But you'll spend
 ALL of your time "fending off evil newbies" and then loose whatever
 edge you think you have.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

2001-03-19 Thread Puckett, Larry (TIFPC)

Cudos to Brandon  Us techies are supposed to be above the ' discredit
the other guy to make myself look good' standard corporate behavior. We all
have so many demands on us that I would hate to have to be on guard for the
backstabbers too. Let the management types live in the political world and
lets keep ours about functionality.

Just another .02

Larry 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
From:   Brandon Rose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Monday, March 19, 2001 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

Everyone was a newbie once... as far as I know nobody was born with a
Catalyst 6509 as an extra appendage (wow, would that be a painful birth!).

I have issues with people who claim they're something it's obvious to any of
their peers they're not, but experience by its very definition takes time.

Is it just me or out of every mailing list I've ever been on this one seems
the most prone to pseudo flame wars?  I thought the great thing about the IT
universe was you don't have to claw people out of your way to make it to the
top of the game, it was instead about your own knowledge, ability, and
experience.

My $.02, but I can only read these "discussions" so often before I have to
say something...

Brandon


 -Original Message-
 From: Christopher Kolp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 3:07 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock
 
 
 You sound very insecure about your knowledge and your job security.
 
 Why must you bash newbies? Are you scared of them? Do they threaten
 your job? I'd take a newbie with an open mind over a jerk who thinks
 they know the world anyday. Sure you know it now. But you'll spend
 ALL of your time "fending off evil newbies" and then loose whatever
 edge you think you have.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

2001-03-19 Thread Allen May

When do I get my check?  I think the 2 cents are up to a few dollars on this
thread now ;)

- Original Message -
From: "Puckett, Larry (TIFPC)" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'Brandon Rose'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 3:19 PM
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock


 Cudos to Brandon  Us techies are supposed to be above the ' discredit
 the other guy to make myself look good' standard corporate behavior. We
all
 have so many demands on us that I would hate to have to be on guard for
the
 backstabbers too. Let the management types live in the political world and
 lets keep ours about functionality.

 Just another .02

 Larry
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  -Original Message-
 From: Brandon Rose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 2:31 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

 Everyone was a newbie once... as far as I know nobody was born with a
 Catalyst 6509 as an extra appendage (wow, would that be a painful birth!).

 I have issues with people who claim they're something it's obvious to any
of
 their peers they're not, but experience by its very definition takes time.

 Is it just me or out of every mailing list I've ever been on this one
seems
 the most prone to pseudo flame wars?  I thought the great thing about the
IT
 universe was you don't have to claw people out of your way to make it to
the
 top of the game, it was instead about your own knowledge, ability, and
 experience.

 My $.02, but I can only read these "discussions" so often before I have to
 say something...

 Brandon


  -Original Message-
  From: Christopher Kolp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 3:07 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock
 
 
  You sound very insecure about your knowledge and your job security.
 
  Why must you bash newbies? Are you scared of them? Do they threaten
  your job? I'd take a newbie with an open mind over a jerk who thinks
  they know the world anyday. Sure you know it now. But you'll spend
  ALL of your time "fending off evil newbies" and then loose whatever
  edge you think you have.

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

2001-03-19 Thread Drew Simonis

"The.Rock" wrote:
 
 oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
  you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
 prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned. Having
 the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say your
 8 years old and I give you a bunch of craftsman tools, does that mean you
 know how to work on a car if someone said fix it? probably not. And there's
 my point. You have the tools, but do you really know how to use them


Your analogy is badly flawed.  You start by referencing knowlege, but 
then drift into tools.  In the internetworking world, tools would be 
the routers, switches, etc.  And in the world of auto-mechanics, the
knowlege would be your ASE certification.   

It would be a much stronger argument if you compared apples to apples
instead of to oranges.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-19 Thread Robert Padjen

I respectfully disagree with your summary point. I
know at least three CCIEs (R/S) that can't network
their way out of a paper bag. The odds are good that
you'll find one that has the knowledge, but its not a
guarantee. BTW - I have a number of co-workers that
have failed the lab but can kick most butts out there!


--- Chris Haller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I too am pursuing CCIE certification and have
 noticed
 a recent influx in people attempting and passing
 CCNP
 and CCIE written, especially the recent addition of
 hundreds of people on this board ...
 
 Anyway, CCNA, CCNP, CCDP ... CCIE Written, this
 means
 nothing.  It is good, takes a good amoumt of work
 and
 is somewhat difficult to achieve, but if that's your
 issue, only interview LAB CERTIFIED CCIE's.  There
 is
 no such thing as a "Paper LAB CCIE"  If you pass the
 lab, you know your stuff .. WELL.
 
 HTH
 
 
 
 
 
 --- Adele Galus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Mike;
  
  I find your comment very interesting, most
 positions
  state how
  many years of experience before applying. The only
  exceptions
  that I have seen with certification positions, is
 in
  the programing field.
  It's not the certification being a problem - it's
  the resources for
  people to obtain experience.
  
  My thoughts are that there needs to be more labs
 for
  people to work in when
  studying for their certification that are
 affordable
  or that it can be obtain.
  People need to be involved with study groups and
  they should do volunteer
  work or try working as a contractor.
  
  This problem became obvious when Cisco  Microsoft
  started programs in
  San Jose for the welfare people to start becoming
  certified. Why did they do
  that
  
  What amazes me is how these people, that you are
  seeing, have passed the test
  
  my 03 cents worth.
  
  respectfully,
  adele
  
  Mike Davis wrote:
  
   I will probably get yelled at for this one
 but...
  
   I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the
  CCIE.
   So up front I am not against certs.
  
   I am becoming aware of more and more people
  becoming
   Cisco certified and not know enough to go and
  actually
   do the work. Our company has and is interviewing
  for
   network folks, I have the opportunity to
 interview
   these people to verify technical experience. I
  have
   had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks
  who
   could not tell me what they 'should' acutally
  know.
  
   This scares me because I am also working hard
  toward
   my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven
 and
  is
   showing up more that these people are becoming
  "paper"
   Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.
  
   I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will
 remain
  as
   difficult if not more so in the future. I for
 one
  do
   not want to spend a year of my life gaining the
  CCIE
   title to be one among thousands who also have
 it.
  
   That is my insite and hope Cisco will
   try to make it more difficult to obtain the
  CCNP/DP
   and not become another MCSE program.
  
  
 __
   Do You Yahoo!?
   Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
   http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
  
   _
   FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
   Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
 to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 =
 Chris from Chicago
 MasterCNE, 5.x CNE, ICNE, 4.x CNE, CCNA, MCP
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
 
 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


=
Robert Padjen

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock

2001-03-19 Thread Mark Mahoney



"The.Rock" wrote:
 
[snip]
 While people here are
 talking about CCNA like its some of major accomplishment.
 CCIE=accomplishment. CCNA=not really worth the paper its printed  on at this
 point. CCNA is a small piece of the puzzle. Come on people this isn't the
 whole enchilada!!! NEWSFLASH

Newsflash back at ya, your opinions dont = truth, or deft analysis. I
dont see ANY posts lauding the CCNA as the be all and end all of the
certification world, OR any CCNA's claiming to be the uber-network-guru
of this sector of the galaxy (or whatever), so who, exactly, is your
longwinded rant targeted at?

Since, regardless of your decade + of exp, you are not yet a CCNA, why
dont you stop wasting time, and bandwidth, and run out and take the
test? In fact, go ahead and take BSCN, BCMSN, BCRAN, and CIT to achieve
CCNP.

Oh, you say your not familiar with the IOS to the degree necessary to
pass ICND 2.0. Well, then, guess what? You are deficient. At least with
respect to Cisco reqs concerning certification. If you dont value a
Cisco cert, or respect them, then why post here? I mean, whats your
point, exactly? You've not added a scintilla of interesting technical
info to the thread.

Seems to me this is simply another troll to spread FUD. I half expect
you will introduce juniper into the discussion soon.

Cisco certs are cisco specific, just as Novell, M$, Vines (remember
Street Talk, anyone, the 1st directory service?)etc. If you want a non
vendor specific cert, get a CNX or equiv. If you simply want to rant
concerning the deficiency of CCNA's, then consider this:

How will you, and others, view that cert once you have achieved it?
That's a rhetorical question, dont reply. But, dwell upon it. Will at
least ONE CCNA out there (YOU) be worthy? Maybe there are a few more
like YOU. If your company requires it, then be a good do bee, and get
it. If not, then pretend it doesn't exist, to the extent that you can,
unless unqualified CCNA candidates are constantly calling your boss, who
is inclined to hire them, and put you out. If that is the case, well,
you chose the company you work for...

And you can tilt at windmills forever more about the dimwitted nature of
folks who hire, and how they, HR, and 'technical' recruiters cant
separate a knowledgeable candidate from a doorstop. But, its always been
that way, and it always will be. Especially so in a field where the
defacto, and actual standards change as often as they do in IT. So, your
lament is for naught. All you can change is you. And, if thats what you
are about, you will mitigate your frustrations with the world via the
satisfaction you get from a job well done. If you are all about changing
the world, then, I am glad you are not on my team.

The 'NA cert is an intro level cert. Its that simple. No one here is
claiming otherwise. In spite of your contrary opinion.

No need to respond.

Mark Mahoney
CCNP CNE MCP

 
 ""Belt, Louie"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  If I gave you all of the manuals and engineering specs on a car and told
 you
  to study them and then tested you on every detail in those books and you
  were able to pass the test would that prove anything?
 
  If I then  gave you all of the tools and all of the parts to a car and
 said
  "build it" and you successfully built it, and I then sent you away and I
  broke the car (in several ways) and told you to come back and fix it and
 you
  were able to fix it would this prove anything?
 
  Obviously it would prove a lot.  This is what the CCIE certfication is
 like.
  You must study all of the networking manuals and know every detail and
 pass
  a difficult exam to prove your knowledge. Then you are given all of the
  tools and equipment you need and you must build an extremely complex
 routing
  and switching network in a very short amount of time using very limiting
  rules.  If you succesfully complete the task, you then get to leave while
  someone "breaks your network in any untold number of ways"  you are then
  told to fix it once again in a very limited time frame.
 
  If you can accomplish this, then you become a CCIE.  I think the CCIE
  certification proves a lot.  It proves you have the knowledge, the ability
  and the troubleshooting skills. It also shows you can work under pressure
 to
  accomplish a goal in a limited time.
 
  But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong grin
 
  Louie Belt
  CCIE #7054
 
  -Original Message-
  From: The.Rock
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 3/19/01 11:32 AM
  Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX - Reply to The Rock
 
  oh yeah one more thing...In case you forgot, certs don't prove anything
   you really are an idiot if you think they "prove " something). The only
  prove your ability to regurgitate info that you supposedly learned.
  Having
  the know how, and knowing how to use are two different things. Lets say

RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-19 Thread fercisco

This issue is turning thisgs upside down from point of view. 

I would like to tell you my opinion. If CCNA, NP, DA, DP and IE written
are not worth then your Bachelors and Graduate studies worth the same. Just
papers.

I learn to configure a cisco router before knowing all the cisco stuff.
I have a CCDA, CCNP and going for the complete set CCDA, CCNP and CCIE complete.

I knew frame relay,atm, sna, dlsw, sdlc, ppp, ipx, switching, etc before
taking any cisco course. I took all cisco traning path version 11.2 and
just recently obtain my degrees and working for the big one. 

What will be your opinion Do I know something or I am just papers?

You sould be carefull on your opinion about this things, all the knowledge
since a long time ago has been paper, No one has achieve glory after years
of practice and experience. 

I was thinking that you are trying to do the same that the shareowners are
doing with the internet economy, you are devaluating the value of the Certifications,
why don't you do the same with the college and and graduate degrees, they
are very similar just studying and passing examns not real life thing until
you pass all the levels (semesters and big exam thesis).

Giga Internetworking

Fer Saldana



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-18 Thread EA Louie

Vincent - I'm not sure...he had the 2600 installation manual in front of him
(Appendix on rommon).  He didn't know the rommon variables were
case-sensitive, I guess, and didn't have his tftp server set up
correctly...he probably won't forget this experience, though.

-e-

Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
991ka6$ntd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:991ka6$ntd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Did he know how to collect information from cisco website?
  If he did not know how to did it, I just wonder.



 ""EA Louie"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó
 007f01c0af4c$7ee0a240$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:007f01c0af4c$7ee0a240$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  some of the certs are like getting a "paper diploma" (which is what I
 got...
  heheheh)  So, if they are going to take the risk and study for the cert
on
  the hopes that they can get a job using the cert as leverage, more power
 to
  them!
 
  By virtue of the testing mechanism, the CCNA/CCNP/CCDA/CCDP will be
  attainable by studying.  I work with one now, who has both a CCNP and
 CCDP,
  but couldn't reload an erased flash on a 2600 series router... go
figure.
 I
  was very tempted to ask, "What are those certs really for?", but I just
  smiled and helped him reload the flash from a tftp server using rommon.
 (By
  the way, the variables in rommon on a 2600 are case sensitive  :-)
 
  When I first started working in industry after earning my degree, my
boss
  put me together with a technician who had no degree, but tons of
 experience.
  The tech rolled his eyes when he met me and said, "Great...I gotta train
  ANOTHER engineer".  What he didn't count on was that I'd learn how to do
 his
  job, not to his skill level (he had 10+ years in the industry), but good
  enough so that he'd trust me to do the work if he wasn't around.  I kind
 of
  feel like him, now... a non-certified "packet jockey" that has to train
  these certified, "paper trained", network "engineers".
 
  I interviewed a guy the other day and asked him, "Why do you want to get

  Cisco certified?".  He said, because he wanted to be a network engineer
 and
  learn how to read/interpret Cisco configurations.  When I asked him "Why
 do
  you want to be a network engineer?", his reason was pretty weak (but I'd
  guess he'd have said "the money" if I pressed him).
 
  The havoc I could wreak on these guys with policy routing,
access-groups,
  NAT, and route maps...  heheheheh...evil grin
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Mike Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:51 PM
  Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
 
 
   I will probably get yelled at for this one but...
  
   I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
   So up front I am not against certs.
  
   I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming
   Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually
   do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for
   network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
   these people to verify technical experience. I have
   had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
   could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.
  
  
   This scares me because I am also working hard toward
   my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is
   showing up more that these people are becoming "paper"
   Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.
  
   I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain as
   difficult if not more so in the future. I for one do
   not want to spend a year of my life gaining the CCIE
   title to be one among thousands who also have it.
  
   That is my insite and hope Cisco will
   try to make it more difficult to obtain the CCNP/DP
   and not become another MCSE program.
  
  
  
   __
   Do You Yahoo!?
   Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
   http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
  
   _
   FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
   Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-18 Thread EA Louie

Manoj - that is exactly the point that everyone is making.

The certification holds little value unless someone has experience.  You
have experience.  Not with Cisco, but with the underlying technologies.  The
interviewers (like myself) look for experience.  Most companies are only
interested in hiring or talking to people with the exact product experience
that is needed in their environment.  YOUR certification proves that you
could PROBABLY do the job for a target company.

I don't remember saying EXPERIENCE WITH CISCO ROUTERS.  I have always
indicated network operations experience, or telecom ops, or network
engineering.

As far as the motive for people getting certified or working as a network
engineer, that is a different topic completely.  The original poster (Mike
Davis) was merely expressing his concern for the perceived lack of value of
the certifications as they begin to enter the market...and how some of these
certified people could not design themselves out of a paper bag, much less
configure a router properly.

-e-

- Original Message -
From: Manoj Sekhar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


 Hi all,

 I am really getting fed up with this discussion of paper certification. I
read one mail
 saying that while  interviewing some one, the candidate said that he
wanted to become a
 network engineer for better pay. Is the this guy became a network engineer
for serving
 the company and people?  Everybody here is trying to make more money for
them self and
 their family to have a better life by getting better qualified and
knowledgeable. The
 certification and study groups and all are only the means for that. First
accept this
 truth.

 About being paper certified, I am an engineer with more than 8 years
experience in
 networking field, but unfortunately I am working with a company who is not
dealing with
 routers or cisco equipment's. I have experience in modems, muxes, ISDN
equipment's, and
 supports wide area networks. Now are anyone of you, who is talking about
paper
 certification ready to give me a job even at the entry level to work on
cisco routers if
 I present myself as of now without certifications? I did tried and I
didn't even got an
 interview call. Now I have some certification and some experience, at
least I am getting
 some interviews. What I feel is that the certifications shows that the guy
knows how
 this stuff works and some idea of how to make it work. It doesn't mean
that he knows in
 and out of anything. Then it also shows that he is willing to learn and he
can pick up
 things fast.

 Don't think that since you have 10 years experience and the other guy
doesn't means the
 other guy doesn't worth anything. He may be able to do things which you
can't and he may
 know things that you don't know. Try to share the knowledge and help him.
Without giving
 a chance, how anyone going to learn?

 Sorry if I hurt anybody's feelings but it doesn't feel write to blame
guy's like me for
 not having experience. We are trying to get experience and we selected the
path to get
 there through certification. Since we got certification we don't claim
that we are
 better than a guy with experience. We just want to show that we can learn
if you give us
 a chance.

 regards,
 Manoj.

 EA Louie wrote:

  some of the certs are like getting a "paper diploma" (which is what I
got...
  heheheh)  So, if they are going to take the risk and study for the cert
on
  the hopes that they can get a job using the cert as leverage, more power
to
  them!
 
  By virtue of the testing mechanism, the CCNA/CCNP/CCDA/CCDP will be
  attainable by studying.  I work with one now, who has both a CCNP and
CCDP,
  but couldn't reload an erased flash on a 2600 series router... go
figure.  I
  was very tempted to ask, "What are those certs really for?", but I just
  smiled and helped him reload the flash from a tftp server using rommon.
(By
  the way, the variables in rommon on a 2600 are case sensitive  :-)
 
  When I first started working in industry after earning my degree, my
boss
  put me together with a technician who had no degree, but tons of
experience.
  The tech rolled his eyes when he met me and said, "Great...I gotta train
  ANOTHER engineer".  What he didn't count on was that I'd learn how to do
his
  job, not to his skill level (he had 10+ years in the industry), but good
  enough so that he'd trust me to do the work if he wasn't around.  I kind
of
  feel like him, now... a non-certified "packet jockey" that has to train
  these certified, "paper trained", network "engineers".
 
  I interviewed a guy the other day and asked him, "Why do you want to get
  Cisco certified?".  He said, because he wanted to be a network engineer
and
  learn how to read/interpret Cisco configurations.  When I asked him "Why
do
  you want to be a network engineer?&qu

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-18 Thread The.Rock

Your an idiot, and that is his whole point. Grades and certs don't mean
Sh*t. It's experience that matters in the end. I whole heartedly agree that
it is becoming just as much a PAPER thing, as well as another way for the
big companies to generate revenue. On the other hand, leave it up to the
companies to hire these PAPER certified people. So they are as much to blame
as anyone else. Only tried and true vets, generally will be able to tell you
how to do something with confidence, and they aren't even certified
 usually due to the workload not because they aren't smart).

So here's your pacifier..

Cheers

""Wilfredo M. Ruelos, Jr."" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
001901c0af46$551b5500$32ce64d4@ohno">news:001901c0af46$551b5500$32ce64d4@ohno...
 JUst because u think they dont know nothing,  they really dont know
nothing
 .  Can u post your grades here so that well see how smart u are?  If u
think
 that you know more than  people who are getting CCXX certified then why
 dont u hurry up and take the lab.  Dont u think that these people should
be
 credited for what they have achieved.  Cisco is not mystery anymore.  More
 and more people will try to learn it. More and more people will produce
 learning aides, materials  that will enables guys to learn as easily as
 possible.  These guys dont have to worry about your opinions after they
 passed these exams.  These guys may even passed the lab before you do.
And
 maybe you will come here complaining  that  Cisco made the lab so easy.
 -Original Message-
 From: Mike Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Sunday, March 18, 2001 2:54 AM
 Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


 I will probably get yelled at for this one but...
 
 I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
 So up front I am not against certs.
 
 I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming
 Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually
 do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for
 network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
 these people to verify technical experience. I have
 had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
 could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.
 
 
 This scares me because I am also working hard toward
 my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is
 showing up more that these people are becoming "paper"
 Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.
 
 I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain as
 difficult if not more so in the future. I for one do
 not want to spend a year of my life gaining the CCIE
 title to be one among thousands who also have it.
 
 That is my insite and hope Cisco will
 try to make it more difficult to obtain the CCNP/DP
 and not become another MCSE program.
 
 
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
 
 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX ( very long)

2001-03-18 Thread The.Rock

We'll said..

I'm reading the CCNA book now and I haven't taken the test yet. I've worked
in networking since early 90's and I have a good background about how
everything works, just not the Cisco IOS. But as I'm reading thru this book,
I can't believe really, how basic it is. I know how routing works,  just not
the IOS. Like i said these tests are just learning the IOS, nothing really
much more. Its been a week and a half now and I'm only 100 pages away from
finishing the book. I'll admit i will have to go back an re-read a few
things, but only cause im studying thru lunches at work and interrupted
constantly, as I don't have the time to go home and do this. I'm actually
dissapointed that Cisco hands out a CCNA cert if this is all it is. But then
again my standards for learning I believe are much higher than most, and
we'll above average. Not because I want it that way, but because i have a
high aptitude to learn new things and concepts and strive to be better than
everyone else. When i pass the test I'm sure that I'll be just as
dissapointed in the CCNA cert as i was the MCSE that I blew out in 3 months.
3 months because I actually know the material and had little time to study
due to traveling( without the help of study aides). The funny thing was I
read an exam cram 6 hours before I took the last test later the same day for
my MCSE. Althought the CCNA isn't there, I'm sure that its only a couple of
days of reading for someone who has a clue. And that's only cause Cisco
test's are like Microshaft's, ambiguous and having to read between the lines
as opposed to what real world scenarios are like.

Anyone who works in the corporate world will tell you one of the things:

1. It's all about perception.
2. Its who you know, not what you know.

And unfortunately, that's the bottom line.




"John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I think a person's attitude regarding this situation depends entirely on
 their experience.  For me, I began in this field a little over two years
 ago.  Starting from scratch, not even knowing what a router was, I looked
up
 to the CCNA certification as something fairly lofty.  All I did for months
 was study until my head hurt, and then I'd study some more.  I also was
 getting daily hands-on experience at work doing very basic stuff and my
 employer sent me to a few classes that helped out greatly.  One of the
 biggest helps was discovering this list!  g

 By the time I got around to taking the test, it was far easier than I
 expected.  This was my first Cisco test and I discovered that for a great
 number of questions, one did not need to know the answer, but you simply
had
 to have decent reasoning skills.  For me, I had reached a new plateau and
I
 was totally psyched about it.  At this point I thought I might never be
able
 to grasp even CCNP-level concepts, as I was just really getting a hold on
 material at my current level.  I wasn't content, yet I was glad that I had
 reached one of my first major goals.

 It was later, while still a CCNA, that I would interact from time to time
 with other CCNA-level people who had not had the benefit of employer-paid
 classes and hands-on experience.  Because I tend to be egocentric and
expect
 everyone to be like me g I would sometimes be surprised that they could
 not answer what I thought was a simple question.  I began to be concerned
 that the CCNA was really too easy, not remembering how hard I had studied
 for months.  That was easy??  It was pretty dang hard at the time!

 My concerns grew when I would interact with CCNP-level people who also
could
 not answer questions that I thought they should have known the answers to.
 Now I was worried that CCNP was too easy and I hadn't even gotten there
yet!
 It seemed pretty hard to me at the time and it took me longer to get it
than
 I originally expected.

 After finally reaching CCNP and then CCDP, I wasn't as excited as I was
 about getting CCNA.  I think at this point, the further we progress the
more
 we realize how much we don't know, especially when faced with the daunting
 CCIE written and lab.

 In hindsight, it should be noted that the certification does not make the
 person.  There are CCNA-level people out there who are far more advanced
 than I, and there are CCNPs out there who can't troubleshoot their way out
 of a paper sack.  I find that this is largely dependent on personal work
 experience.  A CCNA with four years experience in a production environment
 is probably going to be more advanced than a CCNP with two years under his
 belt.

 When expecting a certain level of knowledge, we should look at both
 certifications as well as the actual experience of the person in question.

 Okay, with all of that said, I must agree in part with the original
poster.
 It does concern me sometimes when a CCNP-level person doesn't seem to
 understand a basic CCNA-level concept.  I think this is because I'm
worried
 that since 

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX (Epilogue)

2001-03-18 Thread asesay

We are really sick and tired of hearing such stories. Get a life.
"Circusnuts" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
043d01c0af98$4db87d40$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:043d01c0af98$4db87d40$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 First things first- these E-mails back  forth represent a "preaching to
the
 choir" scenario.  Only the study-ers busy expanding their repartee read,
 participate,  clean out their mailboxes for the benifits of this list.
If
 we're wanting to speak to the people who are only passing tests, doing a
 mediocre job @ best,  debug live Enterprise equipment- again this ain't
the
 place :o)

 This topic frustrates me too.  I'm very professional, study a lot,  I
don't
 show up to a jobs looking like I just left the gym or use the customer's
 site time to figure out what I'm doing.  If your conscientious, do good
 work,  don't fall asleep @ the wheel as to where you should be working or
 what technology you should know- you'll always beat the TCP Magazine
salary
 $$$.

 Phil

 - Original Message -
 From: "Manoj Sekhar" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 3:41 AM
 Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


  Hi all,
 
  I am really getting fed up with this discussion of paper certification.
I
 read one mail
  saying that while  interviewing some one, the candidate said that he
 wanted to become a
  network engineer for better pay. Is the this guy became a network
engineer
 for serving
  the company and people?  Everybody here is trying to make more money for
 them self and
  their family to have a better life by getting better qualified and
 knowledgeable. The
  certification and study groups and all are only the means for that.
First
 accept this
  truth.
 
  About being paper certified, I am an engineer with more than 8 years
 experience in
  networking field, but unfortunately I am working with a company who is
not
 dealing with
  routers or cisco equipment's. I have experience in modems, muxes, ISDN
 equipment's, and
  supports wide area networks. Now are anyone of you, who is talking about
 paper
  certification ready to give me a job even at the entry level to work on
 cisco routers if
  I present myself as of now without certifications? I did tried and I
 didn't even got an
  interview call. Now I have some certification and some experience, at
 least I am getting
  some interviews. What I feel is that the certifications shows that the
guy
 knows how
  this stuff works and some idea of how to make it work. It doesn't mean
 that he knows in
  and out of anything. Then it also shows that he is willing to learn and
he
 can pick up
  things fast.
 
  Don't think that since you have 10 years experience and the other guy
 doesn't means the
  other guy doesn't worth anything. He may be able to do things which you
 can't and he may
  know things that you don't know. Try to share the knowledge and help
him.
 Without giving
  a chance, how anyone going to learn?
 
  Sorry if I hurt anybody's feelings but it doesn't feel write to blame
 guy's like me for
  not having experience. We are trying to get experience and we selected
the
 path to get
  there through certification. Since we got certification we don't claim
 that we are
  better than a guy with experience. We just want to show that we can
learn
 if you give us
  a chance.
 
  regards,
  Manoj.
 
  EA Louie wrote:
 
   some of the certs are like getting a "paper diploma" (which is what I
 got...
   heheheh)  So, if they are going to take the risk and study for the
cert
 on
   the hopes that they can get a job using the cert as leverage, more
power
 to
   them!
  
   By virtue of the testing mechanism, the CCNA/CCNP/CCDA/CCDP will be
   attainable by studying.  I work with one now, who has both a CCNP and
 CCDP,
   but couldn't reload an erased flash on a 2600 series router... go
 figure.  I
   was very tempted to ask, "What are those certs really for?", but I
just
   smiled and helped him reload the flash from a tftp server using
rommon.
 (By
   the way, the variables in rommon on a 2600 are case sensitive  :-)
  
   When I first started working in industry after earning my degree, my
 boss
   put me together with a technician who had no degree, but tons of
 experience.
   The tech rolled his eyes when he met me and said, "Great...I gotta
train
   ANOTHER engineer".  What he didn't count on was that I'd learn how to
do
 his
   job, not to his skill level (he had 10+ years in the industry), but
good
   enough so that he'd trust me to do the work if he wasn't around.  I
kind
 of
   feel like him, now... a non-certified "packet jockey" that has to
train
   these certified, "paper trained", network "engineers".
  
   I interviewed a guy the other day and asked him, "Why do you want to
get
   Cisco certified?".  He said, because he wanted to be a network
engineer
 and
   learn how to read/interpret Cisco configurat

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX (Epilogue)

2001-03-18 Thread Circusnuts

First things first- these E-mails back  forth represent a "preaching to the
choir" scenario.  Only the study-ers busy expanding their repartee read,
participate,  clean out their mailboxes for the benifits of this list.  If
we're wanting to speak to the people who are only passing tests, doing a
mediocre job @ best,  debug live Enterprise equipment- again this ain't the
place :o)

This topic frustrates me too.  I'm very professional, study a lot,  I don't
show up to a jobs looking like I just left the gym or use the customer's
site time to figure out what I'm doing.  If your conscientious, do good
work,  don't fall asleep @ the wheel as to where you should be working or
what technology you should know- you'll always beat the TCP Magazine salary
$$$.

Phil

- Original Message -
From: "Manoj Sekhar" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 3:41 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


 Hi all,

 I am really getting fed up with this discussion of paper certification. I
read one mail
 saying that while  interviewing some one, the candidate said that he
wanted to become a
 network engineer for better pay. Is the this guy became a network engineer
for serving
 the company and people?  Everybody here is trying to make more money for
them self and
 their family to have a better life by getting better qualified and
knowledgeable. The
 certification and study groups and all are only the means for that. First
accept this
 truth.

 About being paper certified, I am an engineer with more than 8 years
experience in
 networking field, but unfortunately I am working with a company who is not
dealing with
 routers or cisco equipment's. I have experience in modems, muxes, ISDN
equipment's, and
 supports wide area networks. Now are anyone of you, who is talking about
paper
 certification ready to give me a job even at the entry level to work on
cisco routers if
 I present myself as of now without certifications? I did tried and I
didn't even got an
 interview call. Now I have some certification and some experience, at
least I am getting
 some interviews. What I feel is that the certifications shows that the guy
knows how
 this stuff works and some idea of how to make it work. It doesn't mean
that he knows in
 and out of anything. Then it also shows that he is willing to learn and he
can pick up
 things fast.

 Don't think that since you have 10 years experience and the other guy
doesn't means the
 other guy doesn't worth anything. He may be able to do things which you
can't and he may
 know things that you don't know. Try to share the knowledge and help him.
Without giving
 a chance, how anyone going to learn?

 Sorry if I hurt anybody's feelings but it doesn't feel write to blame
guy's like me for
 not having experience. We are trying to get experience and we selected the
path to get
 there through certification. Since we got certification we don't claim
that we are
 better than a guy with experience. We just want to show that we can learn
if you give us
 a chance.

 regards,
 Manoj.

 EA Louie wrote:

  some of the certs are like getting a "paper diploma" (which is what I
got...
  heheheh)  So, if they are going to take the risk and study for the cert
on
  the hopes that they can get a job using the cert as leverage, more power
to
  them!
 
  By virtue of the testing mechanism, the CCNA/CCNP/CCDA/CCDP will be
  attainable by studying.  I work with one now, who has both a CCNP and
CCDP,
  but couldn't reload an erased flash on a 2600 series router... go
figure.  I
  was very tempted to ask, "What are those certs really for?", but I just
  smiled and helped him reload the flash from a tftp server using rommon.
(By
  the way, the variables in rommon on a 2600 are case sensitive  :-)
 
  When I first started working in industry after earning my degree, my
boss
  put me together with a technician who had no degree, but tons of
experience.
  The tech rolled his eyes when he met me and said, "Great...I gotta train
  ANOTHER engineer".  What he didn't count on was that I'd learn how to do
his
  job, not to his skill level (he had 10+ years in the industry), but good
  enough so that he'd trust me to do the work if he wasn't around.  I kind
of
  feel like him, now... a non-certified "packet jockey" that has to train
  these certified, "paper trained", network "engineers".
 
  I interviewed a guy the other day and asked him, "Why do you want to get
  Cisco certified?".  He said, because he wanted to be a network engineer
and
  learn how to read/interpret Cisco configurations.  When I asked him "Why
do
  you want to be a network engineer?", his reason was pretty weak (but I'd
  guess he'd have said "the money" if I pressed him).
 
  The havoc I could wreak on these guys with policy routing,
access-groups,
  NAT, and route maps...  heheheheh...evil grin
 
  - Original Messa

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-18 Thread Adele Galus

Manoj

Here - - here, I feel your pain.adele

Manoj Sekhar wrote:

 Hi all,

 I am really getting fed up with this discussion of paper certification. I read one 
mail
 saying that while  interviewing some one, the candidate said that he wanted to 
become a
 network engineer for better pay. Is the this guy became a network engineer for 
serving
 the company and people?  Everybody here is trying to make more money for them self 
and
 their family to have a better life by getting better qualified and knowledgeable. The
 certification and study groups and all are only the means for that. First accept this
 truth.

 About being paper certified, I am an engineer with more than 8 years experience in
 networking field, but unfortunately I am working with a company who is not dealing 
with
 routers or cisco equipment's. I have experience in modems, muxes, ISDN equipment's, 
and
 supports wide area networks. Now are anyone of you, who is talking about paper
 certification ready to give me a job even at the entry level to work on cisco 
routers if
 I present myself as of now without certifications? I did tried and I didn't even got 
an
 interview call. Now I have some certification and some experience, at least I am 
getting
 some interviews. What I feel is that the certifications shows that the guy knows how
 this stuff works and some idea of how to make it work. It doesn't mean that he knows 
in
 and out of anything. Then it also shows that he is willing to learn and he can pick 
up
 things fast.

 Don't think that since you have 10 years experience and the other guy doesn't means 
the
 other guy doesn't worth anything. He may be able to do things which you can't and he 
may
 know things that you don't know. Try to share the knowledge and help him. Without 
giving
 a chance, how anyone going to learn?

 Sorry if I hurt anybody's feelings but it doesn't feel write to blame guy's like me 
for
 not having experience. We are trying to get experience and we selected the path to 
get
 there through certification. Since we got certification we don't claim that we are
 better than a guy with experience. We just want to show that we can learn if you 
give us
 a chance.

 regards,
 Manoj.

 EA Louie wrote:

  some of the certs are like getting a "paper diploma" (which is what I got...
  heheheh)  So, if they are going to take the risk and study for the cert on
  the hopes that they can get a job using the cert as leverage, more power to
  them!
 
  By virtue of the testing mechanism, the CCNA/CCNP/CCDA/CCDP will be
  attainable by studying.  I work with one now, who has both a CCNP and CCDP,
  but couldn't reload an erased flash on a 2600 series router... go figure.  I
  was very tempted to ask, "What are those certs really for?", but I just
  smiled and helped him reload the flash from a tftp server using rommon.  (By
  the way, the variables in rommon on a 2600 are case sensitive  :-)
 
  When I first started working in industry after earning my degree, my boss
  put me together with a technician who had no degree, but tons of experience.
  The tech rolled his eyes when he met me and said, "Great...I gotta train
  ANOTHER engineer".  What he didn't count on was that I'd learn how to do his
  job, not to his skill level (he had 10+ years in the industry), but good
  enough so that he'd trust me to do the work if he wasn't around.  I kind of
  feel like him, now... a non-certified "packet jockey" that has to train
  these certified, "paper trained", network "engineers".
 
  I interviewed a guy the other day and asked him, "Why do you want to get
  Cisco certified?".  He said, because he wanted to be a network engineer and
  learn how to read/interpret Cisco configurations.  When I asked him "Why do
  you want to be a network engineer?", his reason was pretty weak (but I'd
  guess he'd have said "the money" if I pressed him).
 
  The havoc I could wreak on these guys with policy routing, access-groups,
  NAT, and route maps...  heheheheh...evil grin
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Mike Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:51 PM
  Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
 
   I will probably get yelled at for this one but...
  
   I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
   So up front I am not against certs.
  
   I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming
   Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually
   do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for
   network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
   these people to verify technical experience. I have
   had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
   could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.
  
  
   This scares me because I am also working hard toward
   my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is
   showing up more that these people are becoming "paper"
   Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.
  
   I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will 

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX ( very long)

2001-03-18 Thread George

Hi Vincent,

Are you doing job in PSINET?


"Vincent" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
991juq$b3r$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:991juq$b3r$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

 1)CCNP and CCDP is a staring point, from the name of the exam, you
will
 see.
Foundation routing and switching.  CCNP/DP just a stepstone to CCIE

 2)CCIE can demonstrate the lab and means they can do something.
CCIE is a stepstone to real networking world.



 "John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  I think a person's attitude regarding this situation depends entirely on
  their experience.  For me, I began in this field a little over two years
  ago.  Starting from scratch, not even knowing what a router was, I
looked
 up
  to the CCNA certification as something fairly lofty.  All I did for
months
  was study until my head hurt, and then I'd study some more.  I also was
  getting daily hands-on experience at work doing very basic stuff and my
  employer sent me to a few classes that helped out greatly.  One of the
  biggest helps was discovering this list!  g
 
  By the time I got around to taking the test, it was far easier than I
  expected.  This was my first Cisco test and I discovered that for a
great
  number of questions, one did not need to know the answer, but you simply
 had
  to have decent reasoning skills.  For me, I had reached a new plateau
and
 I
  was totally psyched about it.  At this point I thought I might never be
 able
  to grasp even CCNP-level concepts, as I was just really getting a hold
on
  material at my current level.  I wasn't content, yet I was glad that I
had
  reached one of my first major goals.
 
  It was later, while still a CCNA, that I would interact from time to
time
  with other CCNA-level people who had not had the benefit of
employer-paid
  classes and hands-on experience.  Because I tend to be egocentric and
 expect
  everyone to be like me g I would sometimes be surprised that they
could
  not answer what I thought was a simple question.  I began to be
concerned
  that the CCNA was really too easy, not remembering how hard I had
studied
  for months.  That was easy??  It was pretty dang hard at the time!
 
  My concerns grew when I would interact with CCNP-level people who also
 could
  not answer questions that I thought they should have known the answers
to.
  Now I was worried that CCNP was too easy and I hadn't even gotten there
 yet!
  It seemed pretty hard to me at the time and it took me longer to get it
 than
  I originally expected.
 
  After finally reaching CCNP and then CCDP, I wasn't as excited as I was
  about getting CCNA.  I think at this point, the further we progress the
 more
  we realize how much we don't know, especially when faced with the
daunting
  CCIE written and lab.
 
  In hindsight, it should be noted that the certification does not make
the
  person.  There are CCNA-level people out there who are far more advanced
  than I, and there are CCNPs out there who can't troubleshoot their way
out
  of a paper sack.  I find that this is largely dependent on personal work
  experience.  A CCNA with four years experience in a production
environment
  is probably going to be more advanced than a CCNP with two years under
his
  belt.
 
  When expecting a certain level of knowledge, we should look at both
  certifications as well as the actual experience of the person in
question.
 
  Okay, with all of that said, I must agree in part with the original
 poster.
  It does concern me sometimes when a CCNP-level person doesn't seem to
  understand a basic CCNA-level concept.  I think this is because I'm
 worried
  that since I'm also a CCNP, someone might encounter this person and
assume
  that the CCNP certification must not mean very much if they don't
 understand
  even basic concepts.
 
  In the end, though, I don't know if really matters that much.
  Certifications should never be the final arbiter of a persons abilities.
 If
  that were the case, our resumes would be a lot shorter and interviews
 would
  be unnecessary.  All I can do is strive to make myself a better example
of
 a
  CCNP (or whatever) and not worry as much about others.
 
  When studying martial arts I learned to stop comparing my progress with
 the
  progress of others.  Their progress was irrelevant to mine.  As long as
I
  kept studying and could say that today I am better than I was yesterday,
 all
  would be well.
 
  I think that applies here, too.
 
  Thanks for reading my rambling
  John the Wordy
 
JUst because u think they dont know nothing,  they really dont know
  nothing
.  Can u post your grades here so that well see how smart u are?  If
u
  think
that you know more than  people who are getting CCXX certified then
why
dont u hurry up and take the lab.  Dont u think that these people
 should
  be
credited for what they have achieved.  Cisco is not mystery anymore.
  More
and more people will try to learn 

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-17 Thread Wilfredo M. Ruelos, Jr.

JUst because u think they dont know nothing,  they really dont know nothing
.  Can u post your grades here so that well see how smart u are?  If u think
that you know more than  people who are getting CCXX certified then why
dont u hurry up and take the lab.  Dont u think that these people should be
credited for what they have achieved.  Cisco is not mystery anymore.  More
and more people will try to learn it. More and more people will produce
learning aides, materials  that will enables guys to learn as easily as
possible.  These guys dont have to worry about your opinions after they
passed these exams.  These guys may even passed the lab before you do.   And
maybe you will come here complaining  that  Cisco made the lab so easy.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, March 18, 2001 2:54 AM
Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


I will probably get yelled at for this one but...

I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
So up front I am not against certs.

I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming
Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually
do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for
network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
these people to verify technical experience. I have
had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.


This scares me because I am also working hard toward
my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is
showing up more that these people are becoming "paper"
Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.

I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain as
difficult if not more so in the future. I for one do
not want to spend a year of my life gaining the CCIE
title to be one among thousands who also have it.

That is my insite and hope Cisco will
try to make it more difficult to obtain the CCNP/DP
and not become another MCSE program.




__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-17 Thread Adele Galus

Hi Mike;

I find your comment very interesting, most positions state how
many years of experience before applying. The only exceptions
that I have seen with certification positions, is in the programing field.
It's not the certification being a problem - it's the resources for
people to obtain experience.

My thoughts are that there needs to be more labs for people to work in when
studying for their certification that are affordable or that it can be obtain.
People need to be involved with study groups and they should do volunteer
work or try working as a contractor.

This problem became obvious when Cisco  Microsoft started programs in
San Jose for the welfare people to start becoming certified. Why did they do
that

What amazes me is how these people, that you are seeing, have passed the test

my 03 cents worth.

respectfully,
adele

Mike Davis wrote:

 I will probably get yelled at for this one but...

 I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
 So up front I am not against certs.

 I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming
 Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually
 do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for
 network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
 these people to verify technical experience. I have
 had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
 could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.

 This scares me because I am also working hard toward
 my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is
 showing up more that these people are becoming "paper"
 Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.

 I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain as
 difficult if not more so in the future. I for one do
 not want to spend a year of my life gaining the CCIE
 title to be one among thousands who also have it.

 That is my insite and hope Cisco will
 try to make it more difficult to obtain the CCNP/DP
 and not become another MCSE program.

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-17 Thread Bradley J. Wilson

 I have
 had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
 could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.

Maybe it's just me, but comments like this have always bothered me,
regardless of whatever cert program we're talking about.

This might come off as a little stronger than I intend it to, but: who are
you to say what a CCxx should or should not know?  Some people seem to think
that because one has a cert, that they should have *the exact answer* to
*any* question you throw at them at the tips of their fingers.  Well,
unfortunately, this just isn't the case.

I wrote a post a while ago asking what a patch panel was.  I was a CCNA at
the time (I'm now a CCNP  DP), but at that time I didn't know what a patch
panel was.  Some people might have said "Well, a *true* CCNA would have
*known* what a patch panel was," but hey, guess what, the CCNA doesn't test
on patch panels.  Maybe you asked this CCxx something that was fair game on
the certification test, but they didn't get that question, or maybe they got
it and got it wrong, but got enough right to pass the test.

In other words, it sounds like you're saying that only people who get 100%
on the tests should be granted the certification.  And maybe you're right.
But Cisco makes the rules, and we play by them - if someone earns the cert,
then guess what, they've earned it.  Know what they call the doctor who
graduates at the bottom of his class?  "Doctor."  Deal with it.  If they're
just lucky or good test-takers and don't really know what they're doing,
it'll all come out in the end.

Who says what a CCxx should or should not know?  Cisco says.  They say you
need a certain percentage of a certain list of topics.  If you want to hold
a different standard, go right ahead.

BJ


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-17 Thread EA Louie

some of the certs are like getting a "paper diploma" (which is what I got...
heheheh)  So, if they are going to take the risk and study for the cert on
the hopes that they can get a job using the cert as leverage, more power to
them!

By virtue of the testing mechanism, the CCNA/CCNP/CCDA/CCDP will be
attainable by studying.  I work with one now, who has both a CCNP and CCDP,
but couldn't reload an erased flash on a 2600 series router... go figure.  I
was very tempted to ask, "What are those certs really for?", but I just
smiled and helped him reload the flash from a tftp server using rommon.  (By
the way, the variables in rommon on a 2600 are case sensitive  :-)

When I first started working in industry after earning my degree, my boss
put me together with a technician who had no degree, but tons of experience.
The tech rolled his eyes when he met me and said, "Great...I gotta train
ANOTHER engineer".  What he didn't count on was that I'd learn how to do his
job, not to his skill level (he had 10+ years in the industry), but good
enough so that he'd trust me to do the work if he wasn't around.  I kind of
feel like him, now... a non-certified "packet jockey" that has to train
these certified, "paper trained", network "engineers".

I interviewed a guy the other day and asked him, "Why do you want to get
Cisco certified?".  He said, because he wanted to be a network engineer and
learn how to read/interpret Cisco configurations.  When I asked him "Why do
you want to be a network engineer?", his reason was pretty weak (but I'd
guess he'd have said "the money" if I pressed him).

The havoc I could wreak on these guys with policy routing, access-groups,
NAT, and route maps...  heheheheh...evil grin


- Original Message -
From: Mike Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:51 PM
Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


 I will probably get yelled at for this one but...

 I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
 So up front I am not against certs.

 I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming
 Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually
 do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for
 network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
 these people to verify technical experience. I have
 had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
 could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.


 This scares me because I am also working hard toward
 my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is
 showing up more that these people are becoming "paper"
 Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.

 I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain as
 difficult if not more so in the future. I for one do
 not want to spend a year of my life gaining the CCIE
 title to be one among thousands who also have it.

 That is my insite and hope Cisco will
 try to make it more difficult to obtain the CCNP/DP
 and not become another MCSE program.



 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX ( very long)

2001-03-17 Thread John Neiberger

I think a person's attitude regarding this situation depends entirely on
their experience.  For me, I began in this field a little over two years
ago.  Starting from scratch, not even knowing what a router was, I looked up
to the CCNA certification as something fairly lofty.  All I did for months
was study until my head hurt, and then I'd study some more.  I also was
getting daily hands-on experience at work doing very basic stuff and my
employer sent me to a few classes that helped out greatly.  One of the
biggest helps was discovering this list!  g

By the time I got around to taking the test, it was far easier than I
expected.  This was my first Cisco test and I discovered that for a great
number of questions, one did not need to know the answer, but you simply had
to have decent reasoning skills.  For me, I had reached a new plateau and I
was totally psyched about it.  At this point I thought I might never be able
to grasp even CCNP-level concepts, as I was just really getting a hold on
material at my current level.  I wasn't content, yet I was glad that I had
reached one of my first major goals.

It was later, while still a CCNA, that I would interact from time to time
with other CCNA-level people who had not had the benefit of employer-paid
classes and hands-on experience.  Because I tend to be egocentric and expect
everyone to be like me g I would sometimes be surprised that they could
not answer what I thought was a simple question.  I began to be concerned
that the CCNA was really too easy, not remembering how hard I had studied
for months.  That was easy??  It was pretty dang hard at the time!

My concerns grew when I would interact with CCNP-level people who also could
not answer questions that I thought they should have known the answers to. 
Now I was worried that CCNP was too easy and I hadn't even gotten there yet!
It seemed pretty hard to me at the time and it took me longer to get it than
I originally expected.

After finally reaching CCNP and then CCDP, I wasn't as excited as I was
about getting CCNA.  I think at this point, the further we progress the more
we realize how much we don't know, especially when faced with the daunting
CCIE written and lab.

In hindsight, it should be noted that the certification does not make the
person.  There are CCNA-level people out there who are far more advanced
than I, and there are CCNPs out there who can't troubleshoot their way out
of a paper sack.  I find that this is largely dependent on personal work
experience.  A CCNA with four years experience in a production environment
is probably going to be more advanced than a CCNP with two years under his
belt.

When expecting a certain level of knowledge, we should look at both
certifications as well as the actual experience of the person in question.

Okay, with all of that said, I must agree in part with the original poster. 
It does concern me sometimes when a CCNP-level person doesn't seem to
understand a basic CCNA-level concept.  I think this is because I'm worried
that since I'm also a CCNP, someone might encounter this person and assume
that the CCNP certification must not mean very much if they don't understand
even basic concepts.

In the end, though, I don't know if really matters that much. 
Certifications should never be the final arbiter of a persons abilities.  If
that were the case, our resumes would be a lot shorter and interviews would
be unnecessary.  All I can do is strive to make myself a better example of a
CCNP (or whatever) and not worry as much about others.  

When studying martial arts I learned to stop comparing my progress with the
progress of others.  Their progress was irrelevant to mine.  As long as I
kept studying and could say that today I am better than I was yesterday, all
would be well.

I think that applies here, too.

Thanks for reading my rambling
John the Wordy

  JUst because u think they dont know nothing,  they really dont know
nothing
  .  Can u post your grades here so that well see how smart u are?  If u
think
  that you know more than  people who are getting CCXX certified then why
  dont u hurry up and take the lab.  Dont u think that these people should
be
  credited for what they have achieved.  Cisco is not mystery anymore. 
More
  and more people will try to learn it. More and more people will produce
  learning aides, materials  that will enables guys to learn as easily as
  possible.  These guys dont have to worry about your opinions after they
  passed these exams.  These guys may even passed the lab before you do.  
And
  maybe you will come here complaining  that  Cisco made the lab so easy.
  -Original Message-
  From: Mike Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Sunday, March 18, 2001 2:54 AM
  Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
  
  
  I will probably get yelled at for this one but...
  
  I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
  So up front I am not against certs.
  
  I am 

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-17 Thread EA Louie

Dar - I understand your reasoning, and it IS true - USUALLY, the certified
guys have a better knowledge base and therefore catch on quicker.

The real issue that is being addressed here is the true value of the
certification...those experienced network engineers who are in the job
already and getting certified feel threatened by the folks who are studying
and achieving the certs with no experience or minimal experience, and
marketing themselves as CCNP or CCDP.  Its the same problem as the initial
CNE's and MCSE's faced - but the value of the certification goes up for the
CCXX's because *MOST* employers are asking for "CCNP and 4 years of
experience", so they're qualifying their need for the certification.  Either
that, or I've seen ads that say "5 years of networking experience with
cisco, bay, foundry, 3Com, CCNP preferable but not required"

And of course, the one cert that separates most everyone is the CCIE - it's
VERY difficult (some say impossible, but I wouldn't go that far) to obtain a
CCIE with no working experience.

-e-

- Original Message -
From: Dar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: EA Louie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 6:52 PM
Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


 wot i would like to say for certs that they give you a strong base. If you
 are a CCNP and CCDP you know a lot more then some guy working, but if you
 havnt worked you are not comfortable with the equipment. So its just that
 its easier to train a guy whos certified compared to someone who isnt. And
 its not wise to expect that a CCNP/CCDP should be knowing everything, and
i
 think if they are given a chance they might do better then others.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 EA Louie
 Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 6:41 AM
 To: Mike Davis; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


 some of the certs are like getting a "paper diploma" (which is what I
got...
 heheheh)  So, if they are going to take the risk and study for the cert on
 the hopes that they can get a job using the cert as leverage, more power
to
 them!

 By virtue of the testing mechanism, the CCNA/CCNP/CCDA/CCDP will be
 attainable by studying.  I work with one now, who has both a CCNP and
CCDP,
 but couldn't reload an erased flash on a 2600 series router... go figure.
I
 was very tempted to ask, "What are those certs really for?", but I just
 smiled and helped him reload the flash from a tftp server using rommon.
(By
 the way, the variables in rommon on a 2600 are case sensitive  :-)

 When I first started working in industry after earning my degree, my boss
 put me together with a technician who had no degree, but tons of
experience.
 The tech rolled his eyes when he met me and said, "Great...I gotta train
 ANOTHER engineer".  What he didn't count on was that I'd learn how to do
his
 job, not to his skill level (he had 10+ years in the industry), but good
 enough so that he'd trust me to do the work if he wasn't around.  I kind
of
 feel like him, now... a non-certified "packet jockey" that has to train
 these certified, "paper trained", network "engineers".

 I interviewed a guy the other day and asked him, "Why do you want to get
 Cisco certified?".  He said, because he wanted to be a network engineer
and
 learn how to read/interpret Cisco configurations.  When I asked him "Why
do
 you want to be a network engineer?", his reason was pretty weak (but I'd
 guess he'd have said "the money" if I pressed him).

 The havoc I could wreak on these guys with policy routing, access-groups,
 NAT, and route maps...  heheheheh...evil grin


 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:51 PM
 Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


  I will probably get yelled at for this one but...
 
  I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
  So up front I am not against certs.
 
  I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming
  Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually
  do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for
  network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
  these people to verify technical experience. I have
  had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
  could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.
 
 
  This scares me because I am also working hard toward
  my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is
  showing up more that these people are becoming "paper"
  Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.
 
  I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain as
  difficult if not more so in the future. I for one do
  not want to spend a year of my life gaining the CCIE
  title to be one among thousands who also have it.
 
  That is my insite and hope Cisco will
  try to make it more difficult to obtain the CCNP/DP
  and 

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-17 Thread Brian

My take on this is the following.  A company will typically make a
decision based on what you know.  If as a result of your studying, you
have learned enough to make it through whatever technical grilling is
applied at the interview, you probably will get the job.  Most times,
experience will be preferred, certification is just a measuring stick.
Someone could say,"I have 5 years experience with networking", but until
you as a potential employer find out more, you do not know if that 5 years
was spent supporting control panel challenged users or routers.  Someone
with a cert and no experience will have a hard time getting more than an
entry level gig.

Brian Whalen

On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, EA Louie wrote:

 Dar - I understand your reasoning, and it IS true - USUALLY, the certified
 guys have a better knowledge base and therefore catch on quicker.

 The real issue that is being addressed here is the true value of the
 certification...those experienced network engineers who are in the job
 already and getting certified feel threatened by the folks who are studying
 and achieving the certs with no experience or minimal experience, and
 marketing themselves as CCNP or CCDP.  Its the same problem as the initial
 CNE's and MCSE's faced - but the value of the certification goes up for the
 CCXX's because *MOST* employers are asking for "CCNP and 4 years of
 experience", so they're qualifying their need for the certification.  Either
 that, or I've seen ads that say "5 years of networking experience with
 cisco, bay, foundry, 3Com, CCNP preferable but not required"

 And of course, the one cert that separates most everyone is the CCIE - it's
 VERY difficult (some say impossible, but I wouldn't go that far) to obtain a
 CCIE with no working experience.

 -e-

 - Original Message -
 From: Dar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: EA Louie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 6:52 PM
 Subject: RE: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


  wot i would like to say for certs that they give you a strong base. If you
  are a CCNP and CCDP you know a lot more then some guy working, but if you
  havnt worked you are not comfortable with the equipment. So its just that
  its easier to train a guy whos certified compared to someone who isnt. And
  its not wise to expect that a CCNP/CCDP should be knowing everything, and
 i
  think if they are given a chance they might do better then others.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  EA Louie
  Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 6:41 AM
  To: Mike Davis; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
 
 
  some of the certs are like getting a "paper diploma" (which is what I
 got...
  heheheh)  So, if they are going to take the risk and study for the cert on
  the hopes that they can get a job using the cert as leverage, more power
 to
  them!
 
  By virtue of the testing mechanism, the CCNA/CCNP/CCDA/CCDP will be
  attainable by studying.  I work with one now, who has both a CCNP and
 CCDP,
  but couldn't reload an erased flash on a 2600 series router... go figure.
 I
  was very tempted to ask, "What are those certs really for?", but I just
  smiled and helped him reload the flash from a tftp server using rommon.
 (By
  the way, the variables in rommon on a 2600 are case sensitive  :-)
 
  When I first started working in industry after earning my degree, my boss
  put me together with a technician who had no degree, but tons of
 experience.
  The tech rolled his eyes when he met me and said, "Great...I gotta train
  ANOTHER engineer".  What he didn't count on was that I'd learn how to do
 his
  job, not to his skill level (he had 10+ years in the industry), but good
  enough so that he'd trust me to do the work if he wasn't around.  I kind
 of
  feel like him, now... a non-certified "packet jockey" that has to train
  these certified, "paper trained", network "engineers".
 
  I interviewed a guy the other day and asked him, "Why do you want to get
  Cisco certified?".  He said, because he wanted to be a network engineer
 and
  learn how to read/interpret Cisco configurations.  When I asked him "Why
 do
  you want to be a network engineer?", his reason was pretty weak (but I'd
  guess he'd have said "the money" if I pressed him).
 
  The havoc I could wreak on these guys with policy routing, access-groups,
  NAT, and route maps...  heheheheh...evil grin
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Mike Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:51 PM
  Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX
 
 
   I will probably get yelled at for this one but...
  
   I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
   So up front I am not against certs.
  
   I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming
   Cisco certified and not know en

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX ( very long)

2001-03-17 Thread Vincent


1)CCNP and CCDP is a staring point, from the name of the exam, you will
see.
   Foundation routing and switching.  CCNP/DP just a stepstone to CCIE

2)CCIE can demonstrate the lab and means they can do something.
   CCIE is a stepstone to real networking world.



"John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I think a person's attitude regarding this situation depends entirely on
 their experience.  For me, I began in this field a little over two years
 ago.  Starting from scratch, not even knowing what a router was, I looked
up
 to the CCNA certification as something fairly lofty.  All I did for months
 was study until my head hurt, and then I'd study some more.  I also was
 getting daily hands-on experience at work doing very basic stuff and my
 employer sent me to a few classes that helped out greatly.  One of the
 biggest helps was discovering this list!  g

 By the time I got around to taking the test, it was far easier than I
 expected.  This was my first Cisco test and I discovered that for a great
 number of questions, one did not need to know the answer, but you simply
had
 to have decent reasoning skills.  For me, I had reached a new plateau and
I
 was totally psyched about it.  At this point I thought I might never be
able
 to grasp even CCNP-level concepts, as I was just really getting a hold on
 material at my current level.  I wasn't content, yet I was glad that I had
 reached one of my first major goals.

 It was later, while still a CCNA, that I would interact from time to time
 with other CCNA-level people who had not had the benefit of employer-paid
 classes and hands-on experience.  Because I tend to be egocentric and
expect
 everyone to be like me g I would sometimes be surprised that they could
 not answer what I thought was a simple question.  I began to be concerned
 that the CCNA was really too easy, not remembering how hard I had studied
 for months.  That was easy??  It was pretty dang hard at the time!

 My concerns grew when I would interact with CCNP-level people who also
could
 not answer questions that I thought they should have known the answers to.
 Now I was worried that CCNP was too easy and I hadn't even gotten there
yet!
 It seemed pretty hard to me at the time and it took me longer to get it
than
 I originally expected.

 After finally reaching CCNP and then CCDP, I wasn't as excited as I was
 about getting CCNA.  I think at this point, the further we progress the
more
 we realize how much we don't know, especially when faced with the daunting
 CCIE written and lab.

 In hindsight, it should be noted that the certification does not make the
 person.  There are CCNA-level people out there who are far more advanced
 than I, and there are CCNPs out there who can't troubleshoot their way out
 of a paper sack.  I find that this is largely dependent on personal work
 experience.  A CCNA with four years experience in a production environment
 is probably going to be more advanced than a CCNP with two years under his
 belt.

 When expecting a certain level of knowledge, we should look at both
 certifications as well as the actual experience of the person in question.

 Okay, with all of that said, I must agree in part with the original
poster.
 It does concern me sometimes when a CCNP-level person doesn't seem to
 understand a basic CCNA-level concept.  I think this is because I'm
worried
 that since I'm also a CCNP, someone might encounter this person and assume
 that the CCNP certification must not mean very much if they don't
understand
 even basic concepts.

 In the end, though, I don't know if really matters that much.
 Certifications should never be the final arbiter of a persons abilities.
If
 that were the case, our resumes would be a lot shorter and interviews
would
 be unnecessary.  All I can do is strive to make myself a better example of
a
 CCNP (or whatever) and not worry as much about others.

 When studying martial arts I learned to stop comparing my progress with
the
 progress of others.  Their progress was irrelevant to mine.  As long as I
 kept studying and could say that today I am better than I was yesterday,
all
 would be well.

 I think that applies here, too.

 Thanks for reading my rambling
 John the Wordy

   JUst because u think they dont know nothing,  they really dont know
 nothing
   .  Can u post your grades here so that well see how smart u are?  If u
 think
   that you know more than  people who are getting CCXX certified then why
   dont u hurry up and take the lab.  Dont u think that these people
should
 be
   credited for what they have achieved.  Cisco is not mystery anymore.
 More
   and more people will try to learn it. More and more people will produce
   learning aides, materials  that will enables guys to learn as easily as
   possible.  These guys dont have to worry about your opinions after they
   passed these exams.  These guys may even passed the lab before you do.
 

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-17 Thread Vincent

Did he know how to collect information from cisco website?
 If he did not know how to did it, I just wonder.



""EA Louie"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó
007f01c0af4c$7ee0a240$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:007f01c0af4c$7ee0a240$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 some of the certs are like getting a "paper diploma" (which is what I
got...
 heheheh)  So, if they are going to take the risk and study for the cert on
 the hopes that they can get a job using the cert as leverage, more power
to
 them!

 By virtue of the testing mechanism, the CCNA/CCNP/CCDA/CCDP will be
 attainable by studying.  I work with one now, who has both a CCNP and
CCDP,
 but couldn't reload an erased flash on a 2600 series router... go figure.
I
 was very tempted to ask, "What are those certs really for?", but I just
 smiled and helped him reload the flash from a tftp server using rommon.
(By
 the way, the variables in rommon on a 2600 are case sensitive  :-)

 When I first started working in industry after earning my degree, my boss
 put me together with a technician who had no degree, but tons of
experience.
 The tech rolled his eyes when he met me and said, "Great...I gotta train
 ANOTHER engineer".  What he didn't count on was that I'd learn how to do
his
 job, not to his skill level (he had 10+ years in the industry), but good
 enough so that he'd trust me to do the work if he wasn't around.  I kind
of
 feel like him, now... a non-certified "packet jockey" that has to train
 these certified, "paper trained", network "engineers".

 I interviewed a guy the other day and asked him, "Why do you want to get
 Cisco certified?".  He said, because he wanted to be a network engineer
and
 learn how to read/interpret Cisco configurations.  When I asked him "Why
do
 you want to be a network engineer?", his reason was pretty weak (but I'd
 guess he'd have said "the money" if I pressed him).

 The havoc I could wreak on these guys with policy routing, access-groups,
 NAT, and route maps...  heheheheh...evil grin


 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:51 PM
 Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


  I will probably get yelled at for this one but...
 
  I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
  So up front I am not against certs.
 
  I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming
  Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually
  do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for
  network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
  these people to verify technical experience. I have
  had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
  could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.
 
 
  This scares me because I am also working hard toward
  my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is
  showing up more that these people are becoming "paper"
  Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.
 
  I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain as
  difficult if not more so in the future. I for one do
  not want to spend a year of my life gaining the CCIE
  title to be one among thousands who also have it.
 
  That is my insite and hope Cisco will
  try to make it more difficult to obtain the CCNP/DP
  and not become another MCSE program.
 
 
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-17 Thread Manoj Sekhar

Hi all,

I am really getting fed up with this discussion of paper certification. I read one mail
saying that while  interviewing some one, the candidate said that he wanted to become a
network engineer for better pay. Is the this guy became a network engineer for serving
the company and people?  Everybody here is trying to make more money for them self and
their family to have a better life by getting better qualified and knowledgeable. The
certification and study groups and all are only the means for that. First accept this
truth.

About being paper certified, I am an engineer with more than 8 years experience in
networking field, but unfortunately I am working with a company who is not dealing with
routers or cisco equipment's. I have experience in modems, muxes, ISDN equipment's, and
supports wide area networks. Now are anyone of you, who is talking about paper
certification ready to give me a job even at the entry level to work on cisco routers 
if
I present myself as of now without certifications? I did tried and I didn't even got an
interview call. Now I have some certification and some experience, at least I am 
getting
some interviews. What I feel is that the certifications shows that the guy knows how
this stuff works and some idea of how to make it work. It doesn't mean that he knows in
and out of anything. Then it also shows that he is willing to learn and he can pick up
things fast.

Don't think that since you have 10 years experience and the other guy doesn't means the
other guy doesn't worth anything. He may be able to do things which you can't and he 
may
know things that you don't know. Try to share the knowledge and help him. Without 
giving
a chance, how anyone going to learn?

Sorry if I hurt anybody's feelings but it doesn't feel write to blame guy's like me for
not having experience. We are trying to get experience and we selected the path to get
there through certification. Since we got certification we don't claim that we are
better than a guy with experience. We just want to show that we can learn if you give 
us
a chance.

regards,
Manoj.

EA Louie wrote:

 some of the certs are like getting a "paper diploma" (which is what I got...
 heheheh)  So, if they are going to take the risk and study for the cert on
 the hopes that they can get a job using the cert as leverage, more power to
 them!

 By virtue of the testing mechanism, the CCNA/CCNP/CCDA/CCDP will be
 attainable by studying.  I work with one now, who has both a CCNP and CCDP,
 but couldn't reload an erased flash on a 2600 series router... go figure.  I
 was very tempted to ask, "What are those certs really for?", but I just
 smiled and helped him reload the flash from a tftp server using rommon.  (By
 the way, the variables in rommon on a 2600 are case sensitive  :-)

 When I first started working in industry after earning my degree, my boss
 put me together with a technician who had no degree, but tons of experience.
 The tech rolled his eyes when he met me and said, "Great...I gotta train
 ANOTHER engineer".  What he didn't count on was that I'd learn how to do his
 job, not to his skill level (he had 10+ years in the industry), but good
 enough so that he'd trust me to do the work if he wasn't around.  I kind of
 feel like him, now... a non-certified "packet jockey" that has to train
 these certified, "paper trained", network "engineers".

 I interviewed a guy the other day and asked him, "Why do you want to get
 Cisco certified?".  He said, because he wanted to be a network engineer and
 learn how to read/interpret Cisco configurations.  When I asked him "Why do
 you want to be a network engineer?", his reason was pretty weak (but I'd
 guess he'd have said "the money" if I pressed him).

 The havoc I could wreak on these guys with policy routing, access-groups,
 NAT, and route maps...  heheheheh...evil grin

 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:51 PM
 Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

  I will probably get yelled at for this one but...
 
  I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
  So up front I am not against certs.
 
  I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming
  Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually
  do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for
  network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
  these people to verify technical experience. I have
  had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
  could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.
 
 
  This scares me because I am also working hard toward
  my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is
  showing up more that these people are becoming "paper"
  Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.
 
  I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain as
  difficult if not more so in the future. I for one do
  not want to spend a year of my life gaining the CCIE
  title to be one among thousands who also have 

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX ( very long)

2001-03-17 Thread James Haynes

I think the old saying from college was:

When you get your B.S you think you know everything.
When you get your M.S. you know you know everything.
When you get your Ph.D you realize you know nothing.

Jim

"John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I think a person's attitude regarding this situation depends entirely on
 their experience.  For me, I began in this field a little over two years
 ago.  Starting from scratch, not even knowing what a router was, I looked
up
 to the CCNA certification as something fairly lofty.  All I did for months
 was study until my head hurt, and then I'd study some more.  I also was
 getting daily hands-on experience at work doing very basic stuff and my
 employer sent me to a few classes that helped out greatly.  One of the
 biggest helps was discovering this list!  g

 By the time I got around to taking the test, it was far easier than I
 expected.  This was my first Cisco test and I discovered that for a great
 number of questions, one did not need to know the answer, but you simply
had
 to have decent reasoning skills.  For me, I had reached a new plateau and
I
 was totally psyched about it.  At this point I thought I might never be
able
 to grasp even CCNP-level concepts, as I was just really getting a hold on
 material at my current level.  I wasn't content, yet I was glad that I had
 reached one of my first major goals.

 It was later, while still a CCNA, that I would interact from time to time
 with other CCNA-level people who had not had the benefit of employer-paid
 classes and hands-on experience.  Because I tend to be egocentric and
expect
 everyone to be like me g I would sometimes be surprised that they could
 not answer what I thought was a simple question.  I began to be concerned
 that the CCNA was really too easy, not remembering how hard I had studied
 for months.  That was easy??  It was pretty dang hard at the time!

 My concerns grew when I would interact with CCNP-level people who also
could
 not answer questions that I thought they should have known the answers to.
 Now I was worried that CCNP was too easy and I hadn't even gotten there
yet!
 It seemed pretty hard to me at the time and it took me longer to get it
than
 I originally expected.

 After finally reaching CCNP and then CCDP, I wasn't as excited as I was
 about getting CCNA.  I think at this point, the further we progress the
more
 we realize how much we don't know, especially when faced with the daunting
 CCIE written and lab.

 In hindsight, it should be noted that the certification does not make the
 person.  There are CCNA-level people out there who are far more advanced
 than I, and there are CCNPs out there who can't troubleshoot their way out
 of a paper sack.  I find that this is largely dependent on personal work
 experience.  A CCNA with four years experience in a production environment
 is probably going to be more advanced than a CCNP with two years under his
 belt.

 When expecting a certain level of knowledge, we should look at both
 certifications as well as the actual experience of the person in question.

 Okay, with all of that said, I must agree in part with the original
poster.
 It does concern me sometimes when a CCNP-level person doesn't seem to
 understand a basic CCNA-level concept.  I think this is because I'm
worried
 that since I'm also a CCNP, someone might encounter this person and assume
 that the CCNP certification must not mean very much if they don't
understand
 even basic concepts.

 In the end, though, I don't know if really matters that much.
 Certifications should never be the final arbiter of a persons abilities.
If
 that were the case, our resumes would be a lot shorter and interviews
would
 be unnecessary.  All I can do is strive to make myself a better example of
a
 CCNP (or whatever) and not worry as much about others.

 When studying martial arts I learned to stop comparing my progress with
the
 progress of others.  Their progress was irrelevant to mine.  As long as I
 kept studying and could say that today I am better than I was yesterday,
all
 would be well.

 I think that applies here, too.

 Thanks for reading my rambling
 John the Wordy

   JUst because u think they dont know nothing,  they really dont know
 nothing
   .  Can u post your grades here so that well see how smart u are?  If u
 think
   that you know more than  people who are getting CCXX certified then why
   dont u hurry up and take the lab.  Dont u think that these people
should
 be
   credited for what they have achieved.  Cisco is not mystery anymore.
 More
   and more people will try to learn it. More and more people will produce
   learning aides, materials  that will enables guys to learn as easily as
   possible.  These guys dont have to worry about your opinions after they
   passed these exams.  These guys may even passed the lab before you do.
 And
   maybe you will come here complaining  that  Cisco made the lab 

Re: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX

2001-03-17 Thread Jerrold

Right on Jim
""Jim McDowell"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
000701c0af62$7288d600$376b84d1@dude">news:000701c0af62$7288d600$376b84d1@dude...
 This archaic line of thought has been around for ages...in every
conceivable
 organization, since Ally Oop was a fetus...for example, "I had to walk
five
 miles to school every day when I was a kid", or "The old corps was
better".

 Some people are lucky enough to find an employer who will hire a
no-nothing
 and train them into a qualified network administrator.  Others
aren't...they
 have to work for certifications and then get employed in the networking
 field.  For most, having a certification just means they are trying to be
 better (better job, advancement, change careers, etc)what can be wrong
 with that?  In the long run it is always your skill, dedication,
 perseverance, knowledge, attitude, etc., etc. that get you ahead, not the
 perceived value of your certification.


 - Original Message -
 From: "Mike Davis" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:51 PM
 Subject: Cisco Certs Becoming Paper CCXX


  I will probably get yelled at for this one but...
 
  I am a CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and yes going after the CCIE.
  So up front I am not against certs.
 
  I am becoming aware of more and more people becoming
  Cisco certified and not know enough to go and actually
  do the work. Our company has and is interviewing for
  network folks, I have the opportunity to interview
  these people to verify technical experience. I have
  had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
  could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.
 
 
  This scares me because I am also working hard toward
  my certs and the CCIE. But it has been proven and is
  showing up more that these people are becoming "paper"
  Cisco folks, as in the paper MCSE.
 
  I know and hope the CCIE LAB and title will remain as
  difficult if not more so in the future. I for one do
  not want to spend a year of my life gaining the CCIE
  title to be one among thousands who also have it.
 
  That is my insite and hope Cisco will
  try to make it more difficult to obtain the CCNP/DP
  and not become another MCSE program.
 
 
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
 
  _
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]