Hmmm... Maybe it the fact that I forgot that the route needs to exist in the
route table to be redistributed.
If all intents and purposes, I will associate the application of new metrics
burden on the receiving protocol. I feel safe in that assumption.
Thanks for the clarification...
Message Po
The application of the metric is done at the time of redistribution not
after. Remember that the router already knows of the route and has it in its
routing table it is just in a "different language"(protocol) than the
recieving protocol understands so a translation is done. This in
That description on page 698 sounds like as if there was a thing called
"router" between EIGRP and OSPF. In reality, the redistribution is handled
by the (code that belongs to the) receiving protocol.
Thanks,
Zsombor
John Jones wrote:
>
> I am studying for CCIE Written and
I am studying for CCIE Written and lately have been concentrating on
redistribution.
I have come across two statements in Doyle's V.1 that I am a bit confused
about. On page 698 under the Metric section, he states that a cost must be
assigned to each EIGRP route **BEFORE** passing it into
the ISIS interface also under OSPF and make it passive. In the
latter case, no redistribution is necessary, but there are other
issues... that must be resolved bu manipulating the distance of some
networks.
As a conclusion, I prefer redistributing connected subnets. Am I right?
Mojza
Jason
I ran into
yesterday. This is a small part of the topology where I was having the
issue.
OSPF OSPF
R1-R2
ISISISIS
So basically I have two routers that I have both OSPF and ISIS running on,
after completing my mutual redistribution
Jason,
Chuck answered pretty completely, but there's another option that works
well, changing administrative distances. At the redistribution points,
set the default administrative distance for each protocol to something
like 200. Next create an access-list that identifies all r
""Jason Viera"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can't figure this one out. I am mutually redistributing eigrp into ospf
> (dual redistribution points) and vice versa, I also have a separate
> redistribution point in the eigrp domain which introduces
Can't figure this one out. I am mutually redistributing eigrp into ospf
(dual redistribution points) and vice versa, I also have a separate
redistribution point in the eigrp domain which introduces external (AD170)
routes into the Eigrp domain, upon redistribution into OSPF these (external
Yes you can.
Route maps are your friend. You can specify a routemap on the end of the
"redistribute" command. As long as you block anything thats conflicting
(you could always NAT that) the stuff that doesnt conflict should be fine :)
TTFN
Lauren
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/f
Hi John,
I'm busy preparing for the CCIE written. I came across a very good example
that is related to your problem in Routing TCP/IP Vol. 2 (Doyle) p.369. What
it comes down to is that you have a merger between 2 companies that are both
using the 10.0.0.0 network on their private networks - sound
Hi All (long one)
Have my WAN running OSPF using a third party for the virtual Frame cloud
(telstra tpips), have just merged with a company that runs BGP over there
WAN and also use a third party for the virtual frame/IP cloud (not Telstra
Tpips). There is a single site that both companies share,
My two cents
Another thing that is very important and critical with redistribution is the
metric being used in both directions...
Juan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Nigel Taylor
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
ice lab -
R5 - the task calls for mutual redistribution of OSPF and RIP
The next task says that no routes are to be advertised out the RIP
interface - only in.
So tell me, why are we even bothering with the OSPF into RIP redistribution?
I'm not sure I can fall asleep tonight, I'm lau
P.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robert Edmonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:51 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Redistribution question [7:66071]
> >
> >
> > I have a network with approximately 20 V
Try
passive-interface default
no passive-interface s0 (or whatever)
Works for EIGRP. Not sure about RIP.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Edmonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Redistribution qu
Try
passive-interface default
no passive-interface s0 (or whatever)
Works for EIGRP. Not sure about RIP.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Edmonds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Redistribution qu
ually does
work...
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Again, a CCIE practice lab -
>
> R5 - the task calls for mutual redistribution of OSPF and RIP
>
> The next task says that no routes are to be advertised out the RIP
>
I have a network with approximately 20 VLANs, running EIGRP as my routing
protocol. One of my VLANs, VLAN12, runs RIP for connectivity to another
organization. The others do not need to receive RIP updates. So, the
solution I came up with is to make the other 19 VLANs passive interfaces so
that
Again, a CCIE practice lab -
R5 - the task calls for mutual redistribution of OSPF and RIP
The next task says that no routes are to be advertised out the RIP
interface - only in.
So tell me, why are we even bothering with the OSPF into RIP redistribution?
I'm not sure I can fall asleep to
efore not be
> overwritten by redistribution, Same on R7.
>
> I guess I am just not seeing what the topology is or where you think the
> break should be.
>
>
> ""paul dong so"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>Hi All,
>>
&
Sorry if I am misunderstanding your diagram. Where do you think the loop
should appear?
Routes originating on R8 would appear as connected, and therefore not be
overwritten by redistribution, Same on R7.
I guess I am just not seeing what the topology is or where you think the
break should be
Hi All,
Practicing redistribution.
(route) - r8 - (eigrp) - r7 - ospf- r6
| |
--- eigrp
150.50.3.0/24 is redistributed by r8 eigrp, r8 advertises it to r7 via
eigrp. R7 redistributes eigrp to ospf, also redistribute ospf to eigrp
Yup, I think we have just come off a big thread of RIP and OSPF
redistribution! With the risk of sparking it all off again, the main issue
is that RIP (v1) is classefull while OSPF it not. IE RIP doesn't pass
subnet mask prefixes in its updates!
Cheers
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> The
asked before, but I'm just looking for
a general overview and maybe a few good links. I've been told that
there are some issues with RIP and OSPF redistribution. If so what are
they and why.
Thanks,
Steve
Message Posted at:
http://www.
First I'm sorry if this has been asked before, but I'm just looking for
a general overview and maybe a few good links. I've been told that
there are some issues with RIP and OSPF redistribution. If so what are
they and why.
Thanks,
Steve
Message Posted at:
http://www.grou
"In my setup I saw that so long as I had the 200.0.0.4 address on the R4
loopback that the 200.0.0.0/24 refused to propagate. it did not show up in
the R4 table.
"
it has to be in your R4 routing table as a directly connected subnet. I
suppose what you mean is that it doesn't show up as either a os
Cisco Nuts sent me this one off line.
R3---R4---R5
OSPF RIP
R4 redistributes RIP to OSPF and visa versa
each router has a loopback with an address of 200.0.0.X / 32, where X is the
router number
RIP version 1 on R4 and R5. The loopback on R4 is in
Hello, I have 4 routers, R1, R2 and R3 running Ospf and R1, R3 and R4
running
Eigrp. Mutual redistribution on R1 and R3 between Ospf and Eigrp.Is there
a neat and clean way to prevent Ospf routes coming back to Eigrp and
vice-versa? I was thinking the following:1st option: Use the distance
cmd.Set
k to redistribute into OSPF the command is
router (config-router)#redistribute protocol [process-id] [metric
metric-value] [metric-type type-value] [route-map map-tag] [subnets] [tag
tag-value]
example
router (config-router)#redistribute ospf 200 metric 64 2000 255 1 1500
and the command to redi
routes
metric-type OSPF/IS-IS exterior metric type for redistributed routes
route-mapRoute map reference
subnets Consider subnets for redistribution into OSPF
tag Set tag for routes redistributed into OSPF
I need my OSPF routes to show up on my frame switch wich is only
Hello, I am trying to understand route redistribution from ospf to rip
using tags. This example is taken from CCO:
With the following configuration, OSPF external routes with tags 1, 2, 3,
and 5 are redistributed into RIP with metrics of 1, 1, 5, and 5,
respectively. The OSPF routes with a tag of
""alaerte Vidali"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I tried to achieve the result - no success; can you give us a tip?
>
> What I did was using a /16 mask on the link between the RIP routers. But
> when I use ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.255.0 RIP do not run on the
interface,
> although the
I tried to achieve the result - no success; can you give us a tip?
What I did was using a /16 mask on the link between the RIP routers. But
when I use ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.255.0 RIP do not run on the interface,
although the interface is showed on the result of show ip protocol.
R1:
inter se
gt; Hello,
>
>
> I have ospf in to rip redistribution on a /24 classfull boundary, I
> Summarized/ area range(d) all the networks in ospf domain to /24 to get
them
> to show up in rip.domain.
>
> No real problems here, though I haved one network in ospf 200.200.0.0/16
> which
""Casey, Paul (6822)"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
>
>
> I have ospf in to rip redistribution on a /24 classfull boundary, I
> Summarized/ area range(d) all the networks in ospf domain to /24 to get
them
> to show up in rip.domain.
>
Hello,
I have ospf in to rip redistribution on a /24 classfull boundary, I
Summarized/ area range(d) all the networks in ospf domain to /24 to get them
to show up in rip.domain.
No real problems here, though I haved one network in ospf 200.200.0.0/16
which is not showing up in rip router
o run
over a small number of interfaces. In previous IOS versions, you had to
configure all the other interfaces as passive."
> -Original Message-
> From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
Hello,If I have RTA running OSPF with networks 1, 2, & 3 and Eigrp with
netw. 4 connected to RTB also running Eigrp . To mutually redistribute
Ospf and Eigrp, would just a passive-interface under Eigrp to netws. 1, 2
and 3's intf. work or would I also have to configure a route-map under
ospf denyi
Meng Lee wrote:
>
> I tried searching the archives for some explaination on how
> route feedbacks occur during redistribution
Meng,
Route feedback usually occurs in a 2+ points of redistribution scenario.
Routes are learned in Protocol A, are injected into Protocol B, are picked
up
Hello everyone,
I tried searching the archives for some explaination on how route feedbacks
occur during redistribution. The search kept timing out so here I am asking
you guys about this. For example, a scenario concerning RIP and OSPF
redistributing thru a single router. 'Routing TCP/IP
Hi all,
Pls ignore my earlier mail.
You can use the default-information originate command under router rip to do
this.
You can also use the default-network command, but make sure you have a route
to that network in the routing table.
Hope this helps.
rgds,
Murali
Murali Das wrote:
Hi All,
As p
2002 08:09:50 PM
Please respond to "The Long and Winding Road"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Redistribution Practice - a couple of thoughts [7:55748]
an addition to the mix
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote i
e routes redistributed
into ospf )
b) others - match ospf metrics, route types e.g. E1, E2
c) others - match IS-IS route level types e.g. level-1, level-2
6) media dependent issues
a) split horizon ( NMBA )
7) redistribution loops
a) when redistribution occurs at
in no particular order of importance, and for no particular reason.
1) redistributing classful protocols into classless protocols and visa versa
a) getting smaller subnets to match a longer boundary
( subnets with longer prefixes )
b) dealing with larger subnets than
Rajesh Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Everytime I get confused with this metrics while redistribution
This message will have a few basic comments and then a more complicated
comment at the end, when I realized your question was more advanced than we
originally thought...
Routi
;
> - Brian Clark
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajesh Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Redistribution metrics. [7:55297]
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Everytime I get confused with this metric
s and if I was incorrect about
anything then someone else please correct me.
- Brian Clark
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Redistribution metrics. [7:55297]
Hi all,
Everytime I ge
Hi all,
Everytime I get confused with this metrics while redistribution :
The scenario is this :
1. Redist from OSPF to EIGRP.
router eigrp 1
redis ospf 1
default-metric 1544 100 255 1 1500
router ospf 1
redis eigrp 1 subnets
default-metric 25
What
s vermill wrote:
>
> This explains it pretty well:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/ospfdb6.html
Great doc! Thanks.
>
> It's a bit long-winded, but it beats looking at Moi's diagrams!
moi's also. (mine too ;-)
Priscilla
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?
s vermill wrote:
>
> This explains it pretty well:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/ospfdb6.html
>
> It's a bit long-winded, but it beats looking at Moi's diagrams!
Make that "Moy's"
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54122&t=54040
--
This explains it pretty well:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/ospfdb6.html
It's a bit long-winded, but it beats looking at Moi's diagrams!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54121&t=54040
--
FAQ, list archives,
; itself can advertise an AS External Link. Am I getting way too
> weird here? ;-)
>
> ___
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
> www.priscilla.com
>
I'm getting pretty rusty on my OSPF, but don't all three of t
___
Priscilla Oppenheimer
www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
www.priscilla.com
>
> Symon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 25 September 2002 19:53
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Simple static route
Priscilla,
After rereading the question, I see my mistake. I guess I just read right
over the part where he said there was no route from B to A.
Those pesky details will get you every time.
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> evans Anthony w
tatic route redistribution [7:54040]
evans Anthony wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick question:
>
> I have the following setup: (a)(b)---OSPF network
>
> Router A (extreme L3 switch) is connected to router B, and router B is
> running ospf to other cisco boxes.
evans Anthony wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick question:
>
> I have the following setup: (a)(b)---OSPF network
>
> Router A (extreme L3 switch) is connected to router B, and
> router B is running ospf to other cisco boxes. I have setup a
> static route that points from A to B so machine
I disagree - how does router B know to route traffic back to router A?
Router
B will need some static route back to Router A, or some other IGP needs to
run
between A and B. As it is now, traffic *can* get from router A to the OSPF
cloud, but not back.
BJ
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:36:02 GMT Rob
Anthony,
If I understand you correctly, it shouldn't be a problem. All you're doing
is mixing dynamic with static routing. It's done every day, all over the
world. By the way, how do you like your Extreme equipment. Where I used to
work did a migration to Extreme (or rather has been doing a mi
Hi all,
Just a quick question:
I have the following setup: (a)(b)---OSPF network
Router A (extreme L3 switch) is connected to router B, and router B is
running ospf to other cisco boxes. I have setup a static route that points
from A to B so machines can get to pc's in the ospf area. The st
, here are the different ways that I used to inject a default
routevery interesting!!
Anyone with a good explanation?
Redistribution of a default route into Eigrp:
On the border router :
RTF# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 s0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 s1
ip default-network 144.228.0.0
ip
Thank you Kentit works ...
aamer
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46164&t=46160
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violati
Aamer,
Use " bgp redistribute-internal" under your bgp.
HTHs.
Kent
""Aamer Kaleem"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I need some help, I am trying to inject iBGP routes into OSPF on a
> Route-reflector.
> But could not succeed. 177.77.252.0 and 177.77
Hi all,
I need some help, I am trying to inject iBGP routes into OSPF on a
Route-reflector.
But could not succeed. 177.77.252.0 and 177.77.254.0 networks in R2's BGP
table do
not get redistributed into OSPF. Please let me know what I am missing. Here
is a
small diagram:
Thanks Dennis it's very helpfull
Point 6 and 7 in steps for redistribution, how do we determine, if
route-maps or distribution-lists are required, or can we just always omit
the route-maps or distribution-lists command to prevent routing loops in
two-way redistribution, the main thing i
hanks
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Laganiere
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 8:56 AM
Subject: FW: Redistribution Matrix is back
A few months ago I proposed a document with examples of IGP redistribution.
I finished putting together a first draft, and have posted it at
www.laganiere.net. Comment
A few months ago I proposed a document with examples of IGP redistribution.
I finished putting together a first draft, and have posted it at
www.laganiere.net. Comments are welcome, and if anybody has anything to
add, please let me know...
Thanks...
--- Dennis Laganiere
Message Posted at
AD distance comes into play when you have two routes with the same metrics...
When using redistribution, use one way if possible or two way if you MUST.
The general rule is put higher metrics on routes whicih of course are less
preferable...If want my OSPF routes to have a higher metric than my
Hi all,
could someone please enlighten me on this:
what is the best or appropriate way to determine the
seed metric in a redistributed environment?
for example, if you are redistributing eigrp into ospf
or vice versa. Does the administrative distance of the
protocol being distributed come into
I am currently studying for the written exam. Does anyone have any
suggestions on a summary sheet that explains route redistribution for the
different protocols.
Thanks in advance...
Frank
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38488&
I am currently studying for the written exam. Does anyone have any
suggestions on a summary sheet that explains route redistribution for the
different protocols.
Thanks in advance...
Frank
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38487&
That would probably work for the redistribution, I will try it out. I was
actually looking more for a method like the inbound distribute list that you
can use with OSPF. In 12.0 there is a distribute list command that can be
entered under the ISIS process, but it does not filter the specified
Guy,
I couldn't find anything as far as a link on CCO specific to IS-IS
redistribution (at least one that was worth posting). However, I think I
can help you out. Try using a route map instead of the distribute list.
Something like:
'redistribute ospf 100 metric 100 metric-typ
Guy,
I am not in my office today so I can't help you right now. I did find a few
somewhat useful config guides for IS-IS on CCO last year. I'll send you
anything that looks valuable later tonight or tomorrow.
Scott
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36685&t=3658
Does anyone know of a good link that I can go to to find information on
filtering and redistribution in ISIS? The only thing that I can find is a
note in the archives stating that you have to use a clns access-group to
filter, but it doesn't say how to implement it and I am not having any
ooh ooh, I'm getting ready to have some fun with this one. got it mocked up
in my lab. just want to clarify something prior to jumping through hoops and
writing a report.
On R4 you have mutual redistribution between OSPF and EIGRP? ospf---> eigrp
and eigrp -ospf ??
On R2 you have
This is actually something a co-worker has drawn up for me. One of my
weaker points has always been multiple redistribution between multiple
protocols. Goes something like this:
R1-R2R3
ilter-ospf-tag
redistribute EIGRP route-map filter-eigrp-tag
router eigrp
redistribute OSPF tag 1
R3
router ospf
redistribute eigrp tag 2
seems to me there is a trick in here somewhere. maybe on R2, where
redistribution into IGRP contains the possibility of route leak? maybe not
in
are:
>
> 1) how to tag the eigrp routes in the first place and
> 2) why the routes may not appear in IGRP assuming the eigrp tags exist.
>
> there may be a way to tag the routes natively, but I have not found it.
tags
> can be set during redistribution into eigrp using route-m
tags exist.
there may be a way to tag the routes natively, but I have not found it. tags
can be set during redistribution into eigrp using route-maps.
don't forget the metric commands when redistributing into igrp and eigrp.
routes do not get redistributed without a metric assignment. I experi
Thanks Chuck. This is actually part of a greater redistribution plan to
match routes already in EIGRP from another protocol and prevent them from
going into IGRP. I then permit those routers in the other protocol into
IGRP and deny the EIGRP routes in that protocol. Since I can use the tag to
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At what point during redistribution is a route-map processed? In other
> words, if I want to redistribute from EIGRP (supports tags) to IGRP
(doesn't
> support tags) can I match tags in the route map and the
At what point during redistribution is a route-map processed? In other
words, if I want to redistribute from EIGRP (supports tags) to IGRP (doesn't
support tags) can I match tags in the route map and then let those routes go
into IGRP?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
>I don't know if this will help but, there is a book, Cisco IP Routing, by
>Alex Zinin, that looks at Cisco routing from a CS standpoint, it is very
>high level technical book, but some of the code examples may help.
I know Alex from the IETF. Knowledgeable and nice guy. He's been
particularly a
>Agreed, these input from Howard are very helpful.
>
>Can you, or anyone out there in the cisco development community, show some
>light about this basic redistribution mechanism? Sharing those information
>shouldn't hurt Cisco at all, but will help Cisco's user communi
How interesting... it never, ever occurred to me to use prefix
lists to filter anything but BGP. Hmm... Talk about needing
to think outside of the box, huh? :-)
I'm going to have to play with that idea.
Thanks,
John
Get your own "800" numbe
in that case, use a route map in conjunction with a prefix list. it might
get a little hairy if there are lots of routes from different network
classes coming in ;->
Chuck
""Aamer Kaleem"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am sorry i did not mention that RIP int
Rip v1 ...
Bri
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Aamer Kaleem wrote:
> How to configure RIP not to accept routes with subnet mask longer than 24
> bitsany ideas
>
> Thank you,
>
> Aamer
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33151&t=33138
---
I am sorry i did not mention that RIP interface is sending and receiving
Version 2 at interface level.my fault...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33142&t=33138
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http:
configure a /24 or shorter on the interface receiving the updates... ;->
seriously, RIP will accept routes over a particular interface 1) by assuming
that the incoming routes have the same mask as is used on that interface OR
2) at the classfull boundary.
therefore, if the interface mask is a /2
How to configure RIP not to accept routes with subnet mask longer than 24
bitsany ideas
Thank you,
Aamer
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33138&t=33138
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.g
Do you see RIP routes BBR...?
Also Do you see EIGRP routes on TS...?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3&t=30990
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report mis
Hello,
I have RTA connected to router BBR running eigrp 1. Redistribution of eigrp
1 into BGP 100 configured on router BBR
router eigrp 1
network 4.0.0.0
network 5.0.0.0
no auto-summary
!
router bgp 100
redistribute eigrp 1
neighbor 5.5.5.2 remote-as 200
BBR is connected to router TS, running
ursday, January 03, 2002 12:29 PM
Subject: Redistribution bw EIGRP and IGRP [7:30827]
> Hello,I have RTA connected to BBR, running eigrp 1I have BBR connected to
> TS, running eigrp 1 and igrp 2 with redistribution configed bw themFrom
> TS, I cannot ping 4.4.4.2 the serial ip of RTAAnd
Hello,I have RTA connected to BBR, running eigrp 1I have BBR connected to
TS, running eigrp 1 and igrp 2 with redistribution configed bw themFrom
TS, I cannot ping 4.4.4.2 the serial ip of RTAAnd from RTA, I cannot ping
5.5.5.2, the serial ip of TS.The routing table of RTA does not show an
entry
essage -
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Katson PN Yeung)"
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 12:14 AM
Subject: OSPF network wildcard mask affects redistribution (Bootcamp Lab
[7:29321]
> I am doing bootcamp Lab5a and found this funny behaviour.
>
> I have enabled "debug ip i
ay to learn but I haven't forgotten!!!
Dave
Bill Carter wrote:
>
> Depends...No its not necessary, but what if one misconfigured router
starts
> advertising lots of bogus networks. It could flood routers on the other
> side of the redistribution. What if you are redistrib
With a single redistribution point, split-horizon should handle the
filtering for you in most cases.
In a production environment I might apply filtering just to be safe, but in
a lab/testing environment why waste the cycles.
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Depends...No its not necessary, but what if one misconfigured router starts
advertising lots of bogus networks. It could flood routers on the other
side of the redistribution. What if you are redistributing 10.x.x.x network
into a 172.16.x.x network and an a router on the 172.16.X.X gets
Filtering is, yes. Of coarse I'm assuming your not talking about a
single router network since you are redistributing routing protocols.
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> But is it ever necessary if you're only using a single router to do the
> redistribution?
>
> &g
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
