raunchydog wrote:
> If you want to see what an incredible
> variety of female sexual appetites
> there are, check out the Vagina
> Monologues created by Eve Ensler who
> interviewed 200 women and helped
> empower womens' sexuality by letting
> them talk about their Vagina.
>
The majority of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex wrote:
>
> > > Why would a real woman need a male thrusting?
> > >
> raunchydog wrote:
> > Duh? It feels good?
> >
> > > That's the question I guess. Maybe some women
> > > like to live dangerously, I don't know.
> > >
> > I happen to like thrusti
Duveyoung wrote:
> And, yeah, you guys out there, learn
> to fucking fuck will ya?
>
So, it always comes back to thrusting,
Edg. I thought so. That's all some guys
can think about, thrusting, every single
day, if not every hour. It's all about
their penis and their pleasure. It's all
about fuc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > > Sal started things rolling this week with one
> > > simple post that Judy felt so threatened by
> > > that she spend almost a dozen posts "refuting"
> > > it. Sal, on the other hand, just sat back and
> > > allowed Judy to "refute" al
> > Sal started things rolling this week with one
> > simple post that Judy felt so threatened by
> > that she spend almost a dozen posts "refuting"
> > it. Sal, on the other hand, just sat back and
> > allowed Judy to "refute" all she wanted to.
>
> More like a half dozen, actually. (Barry has
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > > Says Judy, two posts from "posting out," less
> > > > > than three days into the week. :-)
> > > > >
> >
> > I have no idea who wrote the above, but I wou
I did that for Judy a while ago, and I got thoroughly abused for it.
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance wrote:
>
>
> > > > Says Judy, two posts from "posting out," less
> > > > than three days into the week. :-)
> > > >
>
> I have no idea who wrote the above, but I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance wrote:
>
>
> > > > Says Judy, two posts from "posting out," less
> > > > than three days into the week. :-)
> > > >
>
> I have no idea who wrote the above, but I would like to propose that the FFL
> rules be changed so that we can offer
> > > Says Judy, two posts from "posting out," less
> > > than three days into the week. :-)
> > >
I have no idea who wrote the above, but I would like to propose that the FFL
rules be changed so that we can offer each other our unused posts similar to
senators, etc. offering their own unused
And, yeah, you guys out there, learn to fucking fuck will ya?
If your partner isn't coming almost every time you make love, you ain't making
love.
If the stats that report that most women are not coming from thrusting are
true, (I think they are,) then why don't you men get jiggy with your ladi
Duveyoung wrote:
> And now Willy comes along with this use of the
> word "thrusting." GAWD how creepy is this guy
> going to get?
>
So, you're in favor of men thrusting into other
men, but Willy is the vile creep for opposing
such behavior? Go figure.
> It's one thing to want America
> to b
(snip)
> Hmmm, I seem to remember someone who obsessively talked about pinky petals
> and colorless sap by endlessly rehashing and repeating the lecture.
> (snip)
He was just describing his experience...of how the transcendent manifests...
Most people still don't get it.
R.G.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > (Except, of course, for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > (Except, of course, for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > (Except, of course, for the rules that keep other
> > > people from doing or saying what he'd rather
> > Why would a real woman need a male thrusting?
> >
raunchydog wrote:
> Duh? It feels good?
>
> > That's the question I guess. Maybe some women
> > like to live dangerously, I don't know.
> >
> I happen to like thrusting as long as I have a
> partner skilled and sensitive enough to know what
> > Listen, Moron, I am opposed to most male
> > thrusting - it serves no useful purposes
> > and it is disgusting and dangerous.
> >
Edg wrote:
> I'd say that Willy's contributions here have
> almost no value compared to Nab's fine
> service unto us all in which he keeps the
> concepts in focu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > (Except, of course, for the rules that keep other
> > people from doing or saying what he'd rather they
> > didn't do or say--that's why he's such a strong
> > supporter o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex wrote:
>
> > > Listen, Moron, I am opposed to most male
> > > thrusting - it serves no useful purposes
> > > and it is disgusting and dangerous...
> > >
> > I don't get WillyTex. Are you saying that men
> > or just gay men should not thrust when th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex wrote:
> >
> > > > I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
> > > > usually serves no purpose, and it's
> > > > downright dangerous during an epidemic.
> > > >
> > Duveyoung wrote:
>
> > Yes, I am opposed to most male thrusting, on
> > general principles, whether it's perpetrated
> > upon women or upon men. It serves no purpose
> > and should be discouraged. Thrusting is a habit
> > most men are addicted to. Most women who are
> > addicted to male thrusting are just feeding
>
> > Listen, Moron, I am opposed to most male
> > thrusting - it serves no useful purposes
> > and it is disgusting and dangerous...
> >
> I don't get WillyTex. Are you saying that men
> or just gay men should not thrust when they
> have sex? How much fun is that?
>
Why would a real woman need
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex wrote:
>
> > > I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
> > > usually serves no purpose, and it's downright
> > > dangerous during an epidemic. Just for the
> > > record, and in my opinion.
> > >
> raunchydog wrote:
> > Habit? Really? What two c
do.rflex wrote:
> Judy's latest 'gotcha,' whatever it represents
> in her own mind, is simply another example of
> her ongoing never-ending perpetual nitpick and
> nag persona including her ulgy, nasty personal
> attacks on anyone she disagrees with...
>
Yeah, you really got Judy this time, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex wrote:
>
> > > I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
> > > usually serves no purpose, and it's
> > > downright dangerous during an epidemic.
> > >
> Duveyoung wrote:
> > Apparently hetero men just gots ta hav it.
> > Yet, Willy, we hear noth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex wrote:
>
> > > I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
> > > usually serves no purpose, and it's
> > > downright dangerous during an epidemic.
> > >
> Duveyoung wrote:
> > Apparently hetero men just gots ta hav it.
> > Yet, Willy, we hear noth
nablusoss1008 wrote:
> Man, you just *gotta* chuckle at Chuckles.
> He's as out of at as Sal, maybe more so.
>
So, Nabby, why do you suppose that people
are so addicted to thrusting? According to
Edg, he's just got to have it. Perhaps the
idea of a large, ever-erect, penile member
is just a mal
> > I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
> > usually serves no purpose, and it's
> > downright dangerous during an epidemic.
> >
Duveyoung wrote:
> Apparently hetero men just gots ta hav it.
> Yet, Willy, we hear nothing from you about
> this practice being exactly the same as a
> homo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> Man, you just *gotta* chuckle at Chuckles. He's as out
> of at as Sal, maybe more so.
But that's not possible ! ;-)
> > I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
> > usually serves no purpose, and it's downright
> > dangerous during an epidemic. Just for the
> > record, and in my opinion.
> >
raunchydog wrote:
> Habit? Really? What two consenting adults
> do in the privacy of their bedroom is nobody's
> b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> (Except, of course, for the rules that keep other
> people from doing or saying what he'd rather they
> didn't do or say--that's why he's such a strong
> supporter of the posting limits.)
Ah, the expected delayed result of me reminding
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:24 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > > YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
> > > about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
> > > abou
On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:48 AM, do.rflex wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:24 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
about gay marriage. I don't have to. And
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:24 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
> > about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
> > about gay marriage. I don't have to. And if I
> > want to introduce a sidebar
--ooops
I posted before I read all the listed...
Grand merci;
many thanks for allowing me to live vicariously through you;
enjoy Europe .
I appreciate the mindset there, as opposed to America,
the Puritans made dark what needn't be
(my opinion)
You , full of heart,enjoy...
- I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
wrote:
>
> raunchydog wrote:
> > Barry seems to have forgotten that it
> > was Shemp who wanted to discuss gay
> > marriage from his anti-gay POV using
> > the box turtle, and slippery slope
> > arguments and that Shemp initiated the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "meowthirteen" wrote:
> >
> > ---
> > *Turquoise:
> > How was your dinner?
> > I bet it was lovely.
> > I wonder if you ate outside,if the weather was gorgeous
> > and what you had brought to you...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
wrote:
>
> raunchydog wrote:
> > Barry seems to have forgotten that it
> > was Shemp who wanted to discuss gay
> > marriage from his anti-gay POV using
> > the box turtle, and slippery slope
> > arguments and that Shemp initiated the
-- h.
And what did you have for dinner?
...listening.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > And now Barry's hallucinating that *Raunchy* was
> > talking about polyamory!
>
> Raunchyd
TurquoiseB wrote:
> > YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
> > about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
> > about gay marriage. I don't have to. And if I
> > want to introduce a sidebar topic into a thread
> > that YOU want to go the way that YOU want it to,
> > tough shit for yo
raunchydog wrote:
> Barry seems to have forgotten that it
> was Shemp who wanted to discuss gay
> marriage from his anti-gay POV using
> the box turtle, and slippery slope
> arguments and that Shemp initiated the
> discussion with "What about that
> disgusting butt thing the guys do?"
>
For
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > >
> > > Keep arguing about gay marriage if you want, Raunchy.
> > > You may do so believing that you are "liberal" on the
> > > issue. All I see is another form of agenda-lade
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:24 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
> > about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
> > about gay marriage. I don't have to. And if I
> > want to introduce a sideb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> What happened is that YOU DIDN'T LIKE the
> sidebar, because it gave other people a chance
> to talk about something else than the thing you
> wanted them to talk about.
No, she "didn't like the sidebar" because it involved
Barry callin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> I merely wanted to steer a conversation away from
> the ugly finger-pointing and blame *you* wanted
> it to remain on and onto a more lofty plane, in
> which wider and less agenda-driven discussions
> might take place.
Says Barry, havi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"raunchydog" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Polygamy: My strategy here would be to shift
> > > > the burden of proof and make a devil's advocate
> > > > argument.
>
> The "differences" Raunchy "poin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> >
> > And now Barry's hallucinating that *Raunchy*
> > was talking about polyamory!
>
> Raunchydog was projecting a bent, feminist
> sexism onto the word "polygamy,"
Barry, y
On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:24 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
about gay marriage. I don't have to. And if I
want to introduce a sidebar topic into a thread
that YOU want to go the way that YOU want it to,
tough shi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > Keep arguing about gay marriage if you want, Raunchy.
> > You may do so believing that you are "liberal" on the
> > issue. All I see is another form of agenda-laden
> > repressed behavior, on both sides.
>
> Barry thinks I should s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > raunchydog:
> > > >
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "meowthirteen" wrote:
>
> ---
> *Turquoise:
> How was your dinner?
> I bet it was lovely.
> I wonder if you ate outside,if the weather was gorgeous
> and what you had brought to you...
> I wonder if you had really nice wine with it.
> I hope you had good conve
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > >
> > > "Polygamy: My strategy here would be to shift the burden of
> > > proof and make a devil's advocat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > >
> > > raunchydog:
> > >
> > > You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
> > >
> > > Whether
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> And now Barry's hallucinating that *Raunchy* was
> talking about polyamory!
Raunchydog was projecting a bent, feminist
sexism onto the word "polygamy," which
*describes* a form of polyamorous marriage.
Only one form, as it turns out,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > And I still don't see the connection between gay porn
> > and gay marriage. Nobody should be forced to view porn
> > of any kind for any reason.
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
[snip]
>
> And I still don't see the connection between gay porn
> and gay marriage. Nobody should be forced to view porn
> of any kind for any reason.
>
If that is the issue, then I agree with you.
And to the extent that people were
-
If anyone needs proof that women have
drive
need
for sex
there's a forum on yahoo
for women who have partners with ED
Erectile Difunction
The fact that it is in existance and used is proof enough that sex is full of
life meaning and complete-ing-ness to females.
The cries of aloneness and e
---
*Turquoise:
How was your dinner?
I bet it was lovely.
I wonder if you ate outside,if the weather was gorgeous
and what you had brought to you...
I wonder if you had really nice wine with it.
I hope you had good conversation and are having bella serah.
*Speaking more to the post now,there is a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
>
>
> I'll agree that to push buttons was part of the motivation.
>
> Me, me, me.I pushed the button first. You just reacted to my pushed
> button as you sensed the pressure of my button on your 13th chakra.
Science
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > >
> > > raunchydog:
> > >
> > > You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
> > >
> > > Wheth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > > > Are you so repulsed by gay marriage that you feel
> > > > compelled to share your prurient inte
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > But Raunchy is spouting feminist bullshit about
> > polyamory without knowing ANY of the actual facts
> > about it.
>
> What Raunchy quoted never mentioned polyamory.
> No
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > raunchydog:
> >
> > You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
> >
> > Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate
> > with you over these
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > raunchydog:
> >
> > You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
> >
> > Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate with you over
> > thes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > "Polygamy: My strategy here would be to shift the burden of
> > proof and make a devil's advocate argument.
> >
> > For those who cite procreation as the basis of marria
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> But Raunchy is spouting feminist bullshit about
> polyamory without knowing ANY of the actual facts
> about it.
What Raunchy quoted never mentioned polyamory.
Nobody is talking about polyamory but Barry.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > raunchydog:
> >
> > You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
> >
> > Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate
> > with you over these
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> > > Are you so repulsed by gay marriage that you feel
> > > compelled to share your prurient interest with a
> > > link so that we can feel as repulsed as you? You
> > > h
And now Barry's hallucinating that *Raunchy* was
talking about polyamory!
Nor did he notice, apparently, that she was quoting
somebody else.
He also didn't notice that the person she was
quoting was making a *devil's advocate* argument,
even though that's explicitly stated in the first
paragraph
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> raunchydog:
>
> You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
>
> Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate
> with you over these issues when you stoop to name-calling. I
> suspect that you do that in or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> raunchydog:
>
> You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
>
> Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate with you over
> these issues when you stoop to name-calling. I suspect that you do that in
> or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> "Polygamy: My strategy here would be to shift the burden of
> proof and make a devil's advocate argument.
>
> For those who cite procreation as the basis of marriage,
> polygamy should be fine given that it is an efficient way
> to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > Are you so repulsed by gay marriage that you feel
> > compelled to share your prurient interest with a
> > link so that we can feel as repulsed as you? You
> > have missed the point completely if you think that
> > such images have an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > > > The "box turtle" stateme
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > If there were a movement in favor of incestuous
> > marriage or polygamy or box-turtle marriage as
> > substantial as there is in favor of same-sex
> > marriage, you might have a point (although there
> > would still be good arguments
raunchydog:
You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate with you over
these issues when you stoop to name-calling. I suspect that you do that in
order to get OUT of debates because at your core you really don't believe your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
[snip]
>
> Again, the point remains that these are separate battles.
I disagree. I think they are the same battle.
> The slippery slope argument does not have merit, it's just another version of
> the box turtle argument.
I d
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > > > The "box turtle" stateme
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > > > The "box turtle" stateme
> If there were a movement in favor of incestuous
> marriage or polygamy or box-turtle marriage as
> substantial as there is in favor of same-sex
> marriage, you might have a point (although there
> would still be good arguments against it), but
> there isn't.
Knowing from my friends that there
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> > > The "box turtle" statement above is really making the
> > > case against gay marriage by not making
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > The "box turtle" statement above is really making the
> > case against gay marriage by not making the case: It
> > is not telling you what is wrong with gay marriage,
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm for gay marriage, polygamous marriage, gay polygamous marriage,
> > > bestiality marriage,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > I'm for gay marriage, polygamous marriage, gay polygamous marriage,
> > bestiality marriage, and incest marriage in equal measure.
> >
> > Aren't you?
>
> This is th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm for gay marriage, polygamous marriage, gay polygamous marriage,
> > bestiality marriage, and incest marriage in equal measure.
> >
> > Aren't you?
> >
>
> Do yo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> I'm for gay marriage, polygamous marriage, gay polygamous marriage,
> bestiality marriage, and incest marriage in equal measure.
>
> Aren't you?
This is the "box turtle argument."
"Interpreting the statement literally: it is clear
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
[...]
> I'm for gay marriage, polygamous marriage, gay polygamous marriage,
> bestiality marriage, and incest marriage in equal measure.
>
> Aren't you?
>
Do you really perceive them as all being the same, or are you just trolling?
My
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not saying I'm for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what
> > > I'm saying is if you hold it to be equ
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what
> > > I'm saying is if you hold it to be equ
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> > I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what
> > I'm saying is if you hold it to be equal to
> > heterosexual marriage then you should treat gay porn
> > just as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
>
> > I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what
> > I'm saying is if you hold it to be equal to
> > heterosexual marriage then you should treat gay porn
> > just as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" wrote:
> I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what
> I'm saying is if you hold it to be equal to
> heterosexual marriage then you should treat gay porn
> just as you would hetero porn...and if looking at it
> shocks you, well then, go
97 matches
Mail list logo
